Added: 2 years ago
From: spacevidcast
Views: 1,851
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (43)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • bailout2, you keep sending me these creepy threatening emails, to my inbox, then delete them and do not post them here, what gives with your confusion,? if you had truth on your side, then you would post your comments beneath the video instead of sednding me personal messages---get real or simply quit sending me the stupid nonsensenical emails

  • you deleted the message from my inbox, but it resides in you tube files, you don't kn ow m uch about the subject you try and appear knowledgable---do the research on each of his ventures, google them, discover the company developers, study his products---teslas, battery heats up and it just creeps along, Mr eberhardt wa sgiven a large settlement for elons hostile tkeover of tesla moters, spacex-research the liquid oxygen-kerosene fuel he uses, its ancient, in detonates in really high atmosphere.

  • elon musk falcon, liquid-oxy-kerosene is early 20th century russian rocket science, 60's splash down rocketry, obama gave him money because he contributed to his campaign, whenever obama dissappears so will elon along with all his hostile takeover companies, without shuttle , chandra and hubble cannot be serviced the russians are abandoning space station in 2 years. musk is an idiot, obama a homosexual manifesto promoter, mentally deranged---free trade is slavery---

  • ti994apc

    Reply to your comment on: Augustine Commission - Elon Musk - SpaceX COTS - 21 of 26

    @lassiecox Do some research. Bush created COTS where spacex came from. Everyone was caught off guard how successful falcon9 was. Even if a Republican were president the facts are that Falcon9 is light years better than anything the US has ever had. ==============================­==============================­=============discussing shuttle 2 and falcon9, is like comparing an eagle to a housefly.

  • falcon 9, outdated russian rocketry, reaching less than 200 miles, with a payload of cheese, designed to bilk money from the nasa budget managed by affirmative action rather than a scientific management team, giving billions to a bankruptcy scam artist, a draft dodger from south africa, who coudn't acquire the security level of 180 pound shop lifting rat, is not something we will have to endure much longer. New technologies ? he does the hostile takeover bankruptcy act, claims to have made it.

  • It's not a true, he will give an opotunity to devepol a new technologies to privat companies, which will be much more cheaper and quicker!

  • moneyman10k

    Reply to your comment on: Augustine Commission - Elon Musk - SpaceX COTS - 21 of 26

    @lassiecox no its not and you are an idiot, kill yourself 17:17

    Augustine Commission - Elon Musk - SpaceX COTS - 21 of 26

    Augustine Commission

    See all comments

    Since you are too cowardly to post your comments on the PR Stunt page, I'll do it for you. Also if you really have an interest in rocket science the google " chronological timeline history of kerosene, liquid oxyget rocket science "

  • Business expansion are made from profits, a situation where the income is greater than the expenses. If the businesses are unable to accomplish this then they end, and the company closes its doors, unless people give their money to keep the company going, however, eventually they go bankrupt, sometimes this is planned from the start, with the intention to get other people to invest, and take the money and stash it in another country. Research the companies histories, discover truth.

  • Your comment about the vast capabilities on the shuttle was the truth. Its the reak leading edge, Now tell me again, how would the pay pal boy actually duplicate the virtually thousands of manyears involved in its development, The more I see, listen, to him the more I am convinced chu ( DOE Czar ) and obama belong tgether. a tres manage

  • To recreate NASA, omitting the experienced engineers should allow china, and probably 2 or 3 other countries to go ahead of us into using orbital warfare. What is this guy on ? Its little wonder barry has began funding him, especially since he has lost more than most mafia backed pseudo-science project failures

  • @lassiecox why the hell do you beret Musk? Oh, I get it, Obama picked him so therefore he is "the enemy". If Mr. Musk, who knows a hell of a lot more about capitalism than you, is able to succeed in doing something no private company has ever done before it will drop launch costs by a factor of nearly 10. Why shouldn't we hope he succeeds? He actually has a rocket on the pad that can get a capsule to orbit unlike NASA and its $1 billion per launch stick that will never fly.

  • @rjholling I watched his videos, did the math, and tell it like it is

  • @lassiecox Ares I is a joke of a rocket. They should have quit it when they saw that SSME could no be used on the upper stage. They new requirements were a 5th segment for the solid rocket booster (essentially redesigning the thing from scratch) and the J-2X engine (a derivative of the apollo J-2 but really a whole new engine). On top of that numerous redesigns on the Orion due to insufficient lift capacity. When all said and done Ares I would cost more than the shuttle for much less capability.

  • @rjholling Ares is part of ongoing engineering design of future rocketry. Taking jobs and downsizing NASA for funding musk ignores the scope of NASA, and ignores mush, being an international citizen based out of Toronto, the worlds bankruptcy trainng grounds for the one brand economy. I see theft of national classified and top secret data. and the use of czars to overide and control the security issues left unadressed. And now he gets a bit part in Iron Man 2. Its his level comic books, pay pal

  • @lassiecox Ares was the biggest piece rocket junk ever created using tShuttle parts that would have cemented the fact that the US is going backwards in technology. Ares had nothing to do with achievement. Ares was made to keep money coming into Lockheed Martin. Falcon9 is safer, more reliable, and 1/20 the cost.

  • @rjholling its not a capitalism thing. Its science and national security, not a private sector thing, unless we return to the days of blurbeard, and layfatte

  • @lassiecox Its not a national security thing and it is not a science thing. The military doesn't use any of the launch systems NASA uses. In fact, Obama's plan calls for the development of a kerolox engine which is something the military rockets (EELV) have to import from Russia. Obama's plan makes more sense from a national security standpoint. All this really has to do with is a certain Republican senator from Alabama wanting pork for his state. But what do I know, I just work in this business

  • @rjholling I agree, you just work in this business ? your dedication is to yourself and you are mad because you probably don't have much of a clue unless it sitting in front of you, and from the sound of things you would share anything you know from the USA actual scientific development with anyone, even an international citizen, and you changeup your stance the more you read on the subject. You are the joke

  • @rjholling the future of warfare are the observation and weapons delivery from space. While you may not be personally involved in the joint efforts betwen NASA and DOD. This entire dialogue of musk reveals noting but words he reads from placards, the words are not his

  • @lassiecox no its not and you are an idiot, kill yourself

  • @lassiecox PS please don't have any children. We don't need anymore people in the world who stand in the way of the people in this country who actually produce and innovate rather than just collect paychecks.

  • @rjholling I believe in professional security of the country, and in the development of instrumentation, showboating doesn't get it for me. I hear the words coming out of your mouth. The wind rings a truer sound. I don't stand in anyones way. I call an ace an ace, and a spade a spade. Don't have children ? Seriously, If I were You and had lived your life I would probably say what you say. I am happy to be me

  • @lassiecox Then call the spade that is Ares I a spade. Its never going to fly, the technical issues with it along with its poor performance are too costly. Not to mention it will be more expensive to fly per flight than Shuttle which has a thousand times the capability. A more sensible approach would be to continue flying shuttle and push development of commercial launch with propellant depots for BEO exploration. Its the only architecture that is sustainable in the era of flat budgets.

  • @rjholling different structures are necessary in the development of futuristic designs

  • It has to do with the head of Tesla Motors Elon Musk getting a half billion dollar D.O.E. loan during a recession for kit cars on laptop batteries because he knows that Nikola Tesla caused the September 1899 Cape Yakataga and Yakutat Bay earthquakes from his Colorado Springs lab on...

    September 3, 1899

    September 6, 1899

    September 9, 1899

    "If you only knew the magnificence of the three, the six and the nine... then you would have a key to the universe."

    -Nikola Tesla

  • China is already planning on manned trips to the moon. They have LOTS of money too.

    The U.S. Could pay the Chinese for access to the moon. This would be more economical.

  • SpaceX is a private venture. it's not costing the u.s. a dime...

  • @SatelliteGalaxy Unfortunately you're right. China plans a lunar orbiter in 2010, a lander in 2013, a sample return in 2017 and a manned mission in the 2020's. Bolden this week said the US will not get out of LEO until after 2030. That is completely unacceptable that the nation that went to the Moon and has championed robotic exploration cannot get back to the Moon before China, Russia or any other nation. It really is a sign of America's declining exceptionalism and in many ways it saddens me.

  • @MasterRegal Obamas declining of america

  • Obamas destruction of american technology 

  • @lassiecox Do some research. Bush created COTS where spacex came from. Everyone was caught off guard how successful falcon9 was. Even if a Republican were president the facts are that Falcon9 is light years better than anything the US has ever had.

  • @SatelliteGalaxy yep they have a lot of money, our money

  • OMG somebody throw a water bottle at whoever kept coughing into the microphone!!

  • @pkscolax they should drug test people before they give them our hard earned money

  • @lassiecox Do they drug test you when you earn it?

  • I'm a big fan of SpaceX and Elon Musk.

    Wow, the Dragon navigation system will be flight tested on STS-127.

    2.5 years required for first crewed mission.. note that it doesn't sound like he's saying SpaceX could do it faster with more money.

  • @quantumG note hiring the original engineers who aready designed, manufactured and launched apolo doesn't require a repetition of the apolo age rocketry costs.

    This entire act is a plan formulated from the bankruptct experts in toronto, tunneling into the us treasury, while an irresponsible corrupt bribable adminstration rules the country

  • I really hope SpaceX achieves success in LEO.

  • @hyhhy spacex technology acheived success, 50 years ago, to repeat it with splashdowns and all, while claiming success, the only success is conning a willing pres, for the cash, before he slinks away, do the research, google the companies he claims to have started, and the inventions, a pack of lies, by a bankruptcy expert, who is an internet philanthropist, who spends more money on internet videos than reasearch

  • @lassiecox Dude, what reality are you living in? So would you deny that Spacex has developed a much cheaper means of transport to LEO. And that they have created a very capable Dragon capsule, and that in a couple years it will be capable of propulsive landing (not splashdown). And that in a couple years they will have a fully reusable rocket; the biggest thing to happen in spaceflight since the rocket itself.

    And if you doubt any of this will happen, I will find you and make you eat your words.

  • @baillou2 If you have something to say about some bogus video, there is a comment section beneath the video, if you don't like what others write, there, is the place to state it. To send threatening emails to strangers you don't know is dangerous, because if they ever see you and you identify yourself, then by law they can protect themselves,

  • @lassiecox That's right, crazy person. I'm gonna make you eat words. I can do it. I have the power to turn speech into edible bite-size chunks.

    ... and I never sent you an email. Nor would I waste my time on a pathetic random youtube troll who has some weird obsession with Elon Musk.

    creepy - I'm just sayin'.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more