@Get1337 When did I ever talk shit on Hondas? I think you're confused. Also what b20 are you talking about because I don't see a b20 VTEC and the b20a falls a bit short of 220 hp. I never said my car is fast but it walks your coveted k20 motor in the RSX-S stock for stock.
@M1K3YM0 he's talking about a frankenstein build. b20 2 liter block with a vtec head from a b16 or b18. and im pretty sure they wouldn't make anywhere near 220 to the wheels unless you had bolt ons and a tune. same with a k24/k20 i think 240 to the wheels is pretty high unless you have bolt ons and a tune.
Cant do anything without a turbo on these things, ugh. All the kids around my parts blowing up there turbo hondas and other imports thinking easy HP no risk... build your shit first haha. Il stick to my vette though, nice s2k man!
@rb26dett32 NA hondas that are bored, stroked, custom fab'd internals and race quality parts. Don't be fooled, every one of those hondas have 100 grand in them. its impressive, but a year of building and tuning on a dyno day in and day out is not cheap just because it is a honda.
@rb26dett32 Thats right they do cost as much as everything else. If you think 8 second quarter mile cars don't cost that much over their life then you don't know much about building them.
@bubbyj Do you not realize what the cars have? And I'm not referring to just 8 second hondas. I'm talking about fast NA Hondas. You are saying for some reason when you car goes a certain speed it magically becomes more expensive to do a simple bore job? Truth is a 13 second honda and a second honda has equally priced parts. Any boring is done is a sleeved block, pistons are all the same price along with bearings. Cams, they use the same cams that I use in my 11 second honda...
Respond to this video... The main difference is the tuning which costs nothing if you are doing it. And I doubt any one with an 8 second car is going to have another shop just tune it... They tune their own and usually own their own shop. But there is no difference in parts. If you say otherwise you have no idea what you are talking about. NA cost more than boost for worse numbers. But once you get to a certain point NA is better and cheaper. Especially now with all the k swaps.
@rb26dett32 So you are assuming a person owns their own dynometer and the supporting computers/software? You'll need a lift, motor crane, custom fab'd parts (racing intakes can cost 3-5grand), etc? It is incredibly expensive to have an 8 second car, and many of these cars are completely disassembled and inspected every 5 runs.
@bubbyj If you have a Honda that runs 8's in the quarter I guarantee you have your own shop, dyno and all tools that are used to build the car. Therefore you are not spending. I don't know of any private parties that have 8 second na hondas. I know of shops but thats it. I'm running a sleeved lsvtec and I run 9.4 @ 150+. I do not have my own shop, dyno or anything. I do the work and then road tune it. I think for being just some guy with a honda that's pretty good.
Respond to this video... You do not need a lift, a cherry picker yes. I have two along with 2 engine stands. What is with you and custom fabbed parts? I don't know why you believe everything is more expensive that it really is. Look up bisimoto manifolds. Also my build has a $9,200 not counting the price of the shell. I have the base parts you can have no matter how you look at it. Best possible cams, cylinder head, sleeved big bore block, pistons and so on. That's less than 100k
@JDMass617 wtf how did u know he wasn't running from the cops??? i did once and ur scared as shit whiles ur trying 2 focus the adrenaline comes in and gives u a weird scary feelin
And while I can't use that power in turns, unless I want the best understeer, or from a dig, unless I want to buy new tires; I still have a good time in my car. I don't carry on like a dipshit with it and I don't try to race minivans at stop lights. Besides, my bike is my track toy.
@323gtxr Yep. I drive an MK5 gti with a big turbo kit and hate hearing from all the vw fanboys about how hondas are shit because they have torque. You try to explain gear ratios and it just flies over most peoples heads. I'm a big vw fanboy myself but would love an s2k. Big power in my fwd car isn't much fun outside of going fast in a straight line from a roll. ;(
@M1K3YM0 Correction, sir. You're misunderstanding ratios, and thus, it "flies over their heads" because of your misunderstanding. The short gearset is compensating for the complete LACK of torque via torque multiplication (definition of a gearset, really). This gives you a repeatable range of RPM over which you have a decent torque curve. Extrapolate that concept and realize that at the end of the day, your torque curve is still horribly narrow and still sucks. Glad it can pass an SUV, though.
@v8rangerboy Boy, you sure are hostile to someone on the internet for no reason. Did you see/hear me telling anyone wrongful information on gearing to anyone? No? So you just assume I am wrong? Not sure what I did to light a fire under your ass but you need to relax instead of trying to get into a "know-it-all dick-waving" contest on youtube. Oh and my car, with 376 horsepower to the crank, can pass far more than an SUV.
@M1K3YM0 Hostile? No. People just don't like hearing they're wrong. Also, you agreed with the other poster who was wrong... so, yep, it stands to reason that you are wrong. No assumption made. So, 376 crank but 434whp according to the description...? Pretty sure the drivetrain isn't making horsepower =/
@v8rangerboy I'm pretty sure you paid no attention to what I was talking about in the first post. I'm not the guy who posted this video, I said that I drive a Volkswagen GTI with a Garret GT28R turbo swapped in for the original K03. In the forums I frequent, people always talk about trashing Hondas because they have low torque numbers. What I was agreeing with was people are ignorant over other factors in cars, such as gearing, weight, and useable powerband. See next post.
@v8rangerboy Honda typically uses naturally aspirated inline fours for their cars. Let's take for example the new Civic Si. Specs: 197 hp / 139 ft-lbs of torque. My GTI stock had 200 hp and 227 ft-lbs of torque. While they have similar horsepower, the Si's torque numbers fall far behind the GTI, yet they run a similar quarter mile. This is because the Honda uses a shorter gear set and makes use of it's fast spinning motor to produce the same amount of force to the wheels.
@rednecknick413 Yes sir, the GTI over the years has gotten a bit heavy. The 2009 Civic Si coupe weighs in @ 2,899 lb and the 2009 Mk5 GTI weighs in @ 3133 lbs with a standard transmission.
@INSANEFREAK1 I've owned a couple Japanese cars and as much as I love them, they're still pretty plasticy. Except that Japanese plastic stays in it's place longer than American plastic, the door and dash panels don't start rattling at 30K miles like American cars do.
I saw much bigger V8 and Inline 6 diesel engines with so much torque than 6.9L cummins. Also Audi at LeMans 24h series using most powerful diesel engine ever made for cars, and Peugeot in 907 HDI
I don't have any more, sold, it was poor 1993. NA 5-spd model.
I'm looking for Stock TwinTurbo Supra and for NSX with C32B engine, redesign lights. Also for race track I'm gonna look for S2000 or even Westfield, Catreham idon't know now.
U don't need, if you have 75,000$ payment per year, you can buy 100,000 $ car easily on loan at 3 years. Also Supra, NSX you can find pretty cheap in United Kingdom :D Have a nice day.
@NastyBuilt. Personally I dont really think S2ks look like chick cars. Mugen makes a hardtop for the s2k that looks amazing if the convertable aspect bothers you.
@NastyBuilt. Personally i dont think S2Ks look like chick cars. But if you want a coupe, Mugen makes a hardtop that looks amazing if the whole convertable aspect bothers you.
@Hebert6760 learn ur cars dude , Hondas when u can rev to over 9 grand u don't need all that torque , and its not made 4 drag , its a track car but even when tuned n built 4 drag they kick ass , when some cars have alot of torque and have 2 shift at 6500 rpm etc the Hondas still has 2500k to 3000k more revs to go , especially when boosted the boost up in the high rpm range is powerful , ever notice how a lot of turbo s2000's beat on vettes and mustangs etc who got all the torque ? ^_^
Hmm lets see production times for vehicles: Fastest Nissan round the track : 7:26.70 Nissan GT-R. Fastest Honda :7:56.773 Honda NSX-R NA2 .Just a little way off you dumb bitch. A Nissan GT-R Spec-V did it in 7:25 which even a honda bike couldnt match.
@90sideways your fucking stupid! go read mags.....circuit hero, win every year! super lap battle wins most of the time!,the super gt leauge our new sports car that just came out this year the honda HSV(honda sports velocity) is whippin ass i hate dumbass people who dont know shit about cars read import tuner,street tuner,honda tunning,modified mag,dsport!!! you might learn somthing!
@kalel3898:38 Honda NSX Sport Auto, (08/1997) 8:39 Honda S2000 round the nurburgring ther slow as fuck you dumb cunt gay fwd pieces of shit if you wana be fats around the track you need 4wd Nigger! Prolli fast in the gay honda class LOL
lol you know nothing! read your books circuit hero,super lap battle,import tuner,d sport,honda tunning,super street,modified mag!...all these show your piece of shit rwd cars getn theire ass whiped ooooo drive in a str8 line wtf thats no damn fun!...honda nsx is old but its mighty funny how the nsx set the record at that track and the new honda hsv rwd!!!!! owns that fucking track! biatcchhh!!!
@kalel389 Hahah books mean nothing! Facts are everything! The only fast honda around the Nürburgring is a superbike [Honda VFR750R] although the nxc-r did a 7:56.73 which is still slow as fuck. you need 4wd nigggggggga
@90sideways yeah we need 4wd when we beat the shit outa the gtr skyline awd,the evo!, and the suby! and your so fucking dumb!! the book shows live picutres of them racing and it on the track in first place and saying in 4 dif mag titles that hey honda did this!...i think thats facts and when theres vids you dumb bitch
i was just trying to say that i think true racing is using the gearbox and not relying on torque to help you when ur in the rong gear inn a turn and such.
hehe howd i know that after reading the vid description the people would rant about torque, yes that is a HORRIBLE TQ rating, kind of makes the turbo pointless...
2 Ways to make power. Carry torque higher, or make more torque. This car is probably on < 10 lbs or so but it revs to the moon so it can make shitloads of power without to much boost.
If you were to look at the area under the power curve of a Honda F1 engine and compare to that of a stock F20C engine you might be surprised. Coincidentally even the "torquier" F22C1 engine's torque peak is only at 162 ft-lbs.
While that may be true, F1 cars also weigh about 1500 pounds less than an S2000. When you weigh barely more than 1300 pounds, it doesn't take much torque to get you moving. On the street and engine like that is still virtually useless, albeit fun as shit on the highway when you get the chance to use all the power.
Hp = How fast your making torque at a given rpm. Thats as simplified as it gets.
Honda's make less toque per revolution of the crank, but because the crank revolves so fast, the gear ratios make the torque that you feel in the seat of your pants. The only difference is you get to experience shifting to 9000rpm through 6 gears, not to mention easy drive-ability and decent mpg at lower rpm.
@Turbo06Sedan now thats stupid. Torque how fast you get there? So your saying a deisel truck making 400whp and 700ft-lbs is faster then a car making 700whp and 400 ft-lbs?
power is a relationship between tq and rpm. the faster your rotate a tire or shaft the less tq is has... power tells you that at a certain rpm it has x amount of tq. debating that a car with more crank tq will be faster than a car with less but more power is stupid as fuck. I can promise you have no background in power or any similair fields... power always wins. otherwise it defies all the laws of physics that are used in this 3d world... you right though, tq is what moves a car but
a 500hp car will -put down more tq than a 300hp car will at any out put shaft speed REGARDLESS OF CRANK TQ. i dont want to fight, just enluighten you. if i increase the output shaft speed by 2, i decrease the tq by 2. so having 100tq@2000rpms is just the same as 50tq@4000rpms. to simple argue that the more crank tq means you win, its ignorant and misleading. this is why they use tqxrpm. it is a relationship. making 200tq@8000rpms is 2 times better than 400tq@2000rpms.. learn before you type
Ok so im not "formally educated" it physics due to i dropped out at 16 but from all my personal expearence its torque that wins. I know nothing about these japanese cars, im a diehard muscle fan, but from everything ive seen its the cars with big engines and lots of torque that always win. Power only being the defining factor between each other. In drag racing, torque is power
well take your own advice and get educated... hanging out with cars doesnt teach you the physics of which run those machines...using gearing, a car with more power will have more shaft tq than a lower powered car. 300tq@3000rpms vs 200tq@6000rpms. using a 2:1 ratio reduces the 6,000rpms to 3000. thus multiplying the 200tq by 2. the 200tq@6,000 thus becomes 400tq@3000rpms. hense why 200tq@6000 makes MORE POWER! learn something so you can teach someone something
Torque is only good for putting the foot down without downshifting (for example over taking on the freeway). Torque runs out straight after.. its just like a push...
What your saying is true, but there are exceptions though. Just cause you have more BHP does not always mean you will have more TQ. A Semi can have as much as 430BHP but can put out as much as 2400Lbs of torque and they only ever turn around 2000 rpm and thats if you wanna hit the rev limiter. , But yes for the most part you are very correct though. But a output shaft speed of 1000RPMS at lets say 1200TQ with only 430BHP will be more then 500BHP with 400TQ at 1000RPM. But yes you are correct
yeah honda's dont have Torque but thats why theyre so light weight. high revving light weight..if ur overweight honda is definitely not the car you'd wanna race with
@clumbzlbc thats if its rwd. if not all that weight is sent to the rear wheels who really dont need it. LOL. so i guess in the case of an s2k, that weight wouldnt be a bad idea. LOL.
spelt and spelled are two different words which mean the same thing because one is british spelling while the other is american. just like sulphur and sulfur.
its a 4 banger, high rpm. I bet the top speed is ridiculous. The torque figures arent the same as lets say... a V8 with the initial surge in power you may be referring to, A vette posts similar torque figures as hp... or not depending on who you ask...
lol just enjoy the damn vid.
SamAdamz 1 month ago
shoulda hit that right turn and kicked it sideways for us ;)
monkeyturd15 4 months ago in playlist boost
@Get1337 When did I ever talk shit on Hondas? I think you're confused. Also what b20 are you talking about because I don't see a b20 VTEC and the b20a falls a bit short of 220 hp. I never said my car is fast but it walks your coveted k20 motor in the RSX-S stock for stock.
M1K3YM0 6 months ago
@M1K3YM0 he's talking about a frankenstein build. b20 2 liter block with a vtec head from a b16 or b18. and im pretty sure they wouldn't make anywhere near 220 to the wheels unless you had bolt ons and a tune. same with a k24/k20 i think 240 to the wheels is pretty high unless you have bolt ons and a tune.
jacksean 3 months ago
434 whp and half the TQ, lol i'll keep my SRT
desert21eagle 6 months ago
looks like paul walker
desert21eagle 6 months ago
that sounds really good :)
18vwT 6 months ago
thumbs up for all the fucks that have no idea what there talking about!! Congrats, your all idiots...
JimChannel 7 months ago
Cant do anything without a turbo on these things, ugh. All the kids around my parts blowing up there turbo hondas and other imports thinking easy HP no risk... build your shit first haha. Il stick to my vette though, nice s2k man!
RedcrossPWNT 7 months ago
@RedcrossPWNT There are NA hondas running 8 second quarter mile passes... Plus you need to have a vette before you can "stick with it"...
rb26dett32 7 months ago
@rb26dett32 NA hondas that are bored, stroked, custom fab'd internals and race quality parts. Don't be fooled, every one of those hondas have 100 grand in them. its impressive, but a year of building and tuning on a dyno day in and day out is not cheap just because it is a honda.
bubbyj 6 months ago
@bubbyj Bored, stroke, race quality parts cost just as much as everyone elses parts. I hope your joking about the $100k.
rb26dett32 6 months ago
@rb26dett32 Thats right they do cost as much as everything else. If you think 8 second quarter mile cars don't cost that much over their life then you don't know much about building them.
bubbyj 6 months ago
@bubbyj Do you not realize what the cars have? And I'm not referring to just 8 second hondas. I'm talking about fast NA Hondas. You are saying for some reason when you car goes a certain speed it magically becomes more expensive to do a simple bore job? Truth is a 13 second honda and a second honda has equally priced parts. Any boring is done is a sleeved block, pistons are all the same price along with bearings. Cams, they use the same cams that I use in my 11 second honda...
rb26dett32 6 months ago
Respond to this video... The main difference is the tuning which costs nothing if you are doing it. And I doubt any one with an 8 second car is going to have another shop just tune it... They tune their own and usually own their own shop. But there is no difference in parts. If you say otherwise you have no idea what you are talking about. NA cost more than boost for worse numbers. But once you get to a certain point NA is better and cheaper. Especially now with all the k swaps.
rb26dett32 6 months ago
@rb26dett32 So you are assuming a person owns their own dynometer and the supporting computers/software? You'll need a lift, motor crane, custom fab'd parts (racing intakes can cost 3-5grand), etc? It is incredibly expensive to have an 8 second car, and many of these cars are completely disassembled and inspected every 5 runs.
bubbyj 6 months ago
@bubbyj If you have a Honda that runs 8's in the quarter I guarantee you have your own shop, dyno and all tools that are used to build the car. Therefore you are not spending. I don't know of any private parties that have 8 second na hondas. I know of shops but thats it. I'm running a sleeved lsvtec and I run 9.4 @ 150+. I do not have my own shop, dyno or anything. I do the work and then road tune it. I think for being just some guy with a honda that's pretty good.
rb26dett32 6 months ago
Respond to this video... You do not need a lift, a cherry picker yes. I have two along with 2 engine stands. What is with you and custom fabbed parts? I don't know why you believe everything is more expensive that it really is. Look up bisimoto manifolds. Also my build has a $9,200 not counting the price of the shell. I have the base parts you can have no matter how you look at it. Best possible cams, cylinder head, sleeved big bore block, pistons and so on. That's less than 100k
rb26dett32 6 months ago
who drives a turbo s2k with a mean face? Lighten up prick
JDMass617 7 months ago 36
@JDMass617 wtf how did u know he wasn't running from the cops??? i did once and ur scared as shit whiles ur trying 2 focus the adrenaline comes in and gives u a weird scary feelin
MrJuice105 6 months ago
@JDMass617 hahahaha
Ateyurock 6 months ago
@JDMass617 Why don't you lighten up. It's clearly sunny out and the sun is coming in from the top of his glasses.
1465225568 6 months ago
@JDMass617 Maybe he was squinting because it was sunny, Yes i know he has glasses on but sometimes they dont help. So you lighten up prick.
mirnes16 3 months ago
26 ppl gots a van
elkatademalaga 8 months ago
I think he wrecked at the end at the last turn and cut it off so we wouldn't lulz at him.
Trippy20100 8 months ago
@M1K3YMO thumbs up to you
yamplaya 8 months ago
@iLikePorNOOBraphy that was a chevy tahoe which is a SUV not a van!!!!!!
neerredd 8 months ago
OH, YOU LOOK KOOL DRIVING REALLY FAST WHILE WEARING SUNGLASSES
Dieg0Mora 9 months ago
you suck
Dieg0Mora 9 months ago
And while I can't use that power in turns, unless I want the best understeer, or from a dig, unless I want to buy new tires; I still have a good time in my car. I don't carry on like a dipshit with it and I don't try to race minivans at stop lights. Besides, my bike is my track toy.
M1K3YM0 9 months ago
nice car
Knezicdex 10 months ago
... greddy kit overtake
imeowforicecreamyum 11 months ago
WOW, you over took that truck driving at highway speeds. Big man..
tasoulinh 1 year ago
@tasoulinh tht shit wud spank anything u have guy ...big man
icecathockey66 1 year ago
worthless shiftin
shadyredline 1 year ago
Lots of revs + short gears = More torque to the wheels then you ignorant kids want to understand. Read a book and learn the math kids.
323gtxr 1 year ago
@323gtxr Yep. I drive an MK5 gti with a big turbo kit and hate hearing from all the vw fanboys about how hondas are shit because they have torque. You try to explain gear ratios and it just flies over most peoples heads. I'm a big vw fanboy myself but would love an s2k. Big power in my fwd car isn't much fun outside of going fast in a straight line from a roll. ;(
M1K3YM0 11 months ago 4
@M1K3YM0
I will love that my MK IV BT could be FR...too much power to the front wheels can't be used everytime...
rologti 10 months ago
@M1K3YM0 Correction, sir. You're misunderstanding ratios, and thus, it "flies over their heads" because of your misunderstanding. The short gearset is compensating for the complete LACK of torque via torque multiplication (definition of a gearset, really). This gives you a repeatable range of RPM over which you have a decent torque curve. Extrapolate that concept and realize that at the end of the day, your torque curve is still horribly narrow and still sucks. Glad it can pass an SUV, though.
v8rangerboy 9 months ago
@v8rangerboy Boy, you sure are hostile to someone on the internet for no reason. Did you see/hear me telling anyone wrongful information on gearing to anyone? No? So you just assume I am wrong? Not sure what I did to light a fire under your ass but you need to relax instead of trying to get into a "know-it-all dick-waving" contest on youtube. Oh and my car, with 376 horsepower to the crank, can pass far more than an SUV.
M1K3YM0 9 months ago
@M1K3YM0 Hostile? No. People just don't like hearing they're wrong. Also, you agreed with the other poster who was wrong... so, yep, it stands to reason that you are wrong. No assumption made. So, 376 crank but 434whp according to the description...? Pretty sure the drivetrain isn't making horsepower =/
v8rangerboy 9 months ago
@v8rangerboy I'm pretty sure you paid no attention to what I was talking about in the first post. I'm not the guy who posted this video, I said that I drive a Volkswagen GTI with a Garret GT28R turbo swapped in for the original K03. In the forums I frequent, people always talk about trashing Hondas because they have low torque numbers. What I was agreeing with was people are ignorant over other factors in cars, such as gearing, weight, and useable powerband. See next post.
M1K3YM0 9 months ago 2
@v8rangerboy Honda typically uses naturally aspirated inline fours for their cars. Let's take for example the new Civic Si. Specs: 197 hp / 139 ft-lbs of torque. My GTI stock had 200 hp and 227 ft-lbs of torque. While they have similar horsepower, the Si's torque numbers fall far behind the GTI, yet they run a similar quarter mile. This is because the Honda uses a shorter gear set and makes use of it's fast spinning motor to produce the same amount of force to the wheels.
M1K3YM0 9 months ago 13
@M1K3YM0 the gti is also a heavier car if im not mistaken
rednecknick413 6 months ago
@rednecknick413 Yes sir, the GTI over the years has gotten a bit heavy. The 2009 Civic Si coupe weighs in @ 2,899 lb and the 2009 Mk5 GTI weighs in @ 3133 lbs with a standard transmission.
M1K3YM0 6 months ago
@M1K3YM0 i would still rather have the gti though vr6 swapped or something would be hella fun
rednecknick413 6 months ago
@M1K3YM0 you have forgot the most important!! VTAC!! haha
yopimpalot 6 months ago
Isn't that in North East??
AJGeRM 1 year ago
@adkos79 i agree, but id rather have a honda or toyota or any Japanese car, more reliable and aint so plasticy lol
INSANEFREAK1 1 year ago
@INSANEFREAK1 I've owned a couple Japanese cars and as much as I love them, they're still pretty plasticy. Except that Japanese plastic stays in it's place longer than American plastic, the door and dash panels don't start rattling at 30K miles like American cars do.
teggsrb18c1 1 year ago
did u guys see the vid HIgh 7 sec s2K 1/4 if u guys wanna talk about torque..
ooPoGiBoYoo 1 year ago
All u guys dont know shit about cars, its obvious HP means Hot Punani, and Torque its some kind of european food, jeez must i teach you all this?
RicardoR5 1 year ago
cummins is the torque master...not a petty honda
f44life 1 year ago
@f44life
cummins are diesels and for tractors not for sport cars, and yes it makes more torque than LS7.
2jzgtejza80 1 year ago
@2jzgtejza80 guess you havent came across a fast diesel truck...must be in sportcar only area
f44life 1 year ago
@f44life
I saw much bigger V8 and Inline 6 diesel engines with so much torque than 6.9L cummins. Also Audi at LeMans 24h series using most powerful diesel engine ever made for cars, and Peugeot in 907 HDI
2jzgtejza80 1 year ago
@2jzgtejza80 its a 6.7
f44life 1 year ago
@f44life
I saw 6.9 twin turbo O.o?
2jzgtejza80 1 year ago
@2jzgtejza80 so you have a supra but no vids? whats up with that?
f44life 1 year ago
@f44life
I don't have any more, sold, it was poor 1993. NA 5-spd model.
I'm looking for Stock TwinTurbo Supra and for NSX with C32B engine, redesign lights. Also for race track I'm gonna look for S2000 or even Westfield, Catreham idon't know now.
I don't have time to produce videos.
2jzgtejza80 1 year ago
@2jzgtejza80 you must be rich to afford a 30gran vehicle minimum
f44life 1 year ago
@f44life
U don't need, if you have 75,000$ payment per year, you can buy 100,000 $ car easily on loan at 3 years. Also Supra, NSX you can find pretty cheap in United Kingdom :D Have a nice day.
2jzgtejza80 1 year ago
HOW much you pay for everything
?
cesarortiz24 1 year ago
s2000 are damn great cars on touges !!!!!! if you know wtf im talking about.
noizeegurl 1 year ago
once the s2k is a coupe and doesnt look like a chick car ill love it
NastyBuilt 1 year ago
@NastyBuilt. Personally I dont really think S2ks look like chick cars. Mugen makes a hardtop for the s2k that looks amazing if the convertable aspect bothers you.
stud14821 1 year ago
@NastyBuilt. Personally i dont think S2Ks look like chick cars. But if you want a coupe, Mugen makes a hardtop that looks amazing if the whole convertable aspect bothers you.
stud14821 1 year ago
waow this honda really suck
434hp not bad but 255 tq?????
damn i guess hondas are torqueless
Hebert6760 1 year ago
@Hebert6760 learn ur cars dude , Hondas when u can rev to over 9 grand u don't need all that torque , and its not made 4 drag , its a track car but even when tuned n built 4 drag they kick ass , when some cars have alot of torque and have 2 shift at 6500 rpm etc the Hondas still has 2500k to 3000k more revs to go , especially when boosted the boost up in the high rpm range is powerful , ever notice how a lot of turbo s2000's beat on vettes and mustangs etc who got all the torque ? ^_^
TheMugenboy 1 year ago
sounds awesome!
AllaboutTheDiesel 1 year ago
@adkos79 true that
steveonagle 1 year ago
yes play it off like you didnt miss shift lol but nice ride didnt seem like 434whp but still nice
DwiZZy34 1 year ago
@iLikePorNOOBraphy that looks more like an SUV
cxiong116 1 year ago
stock driveshaft ?
Perazzi11 1 year ago
@adkos79 if only everybody thought like you!
daneo226 1 year ago
cool car and fast but your torque is kinda weak...
myuzz 1 year ago
sounds sweettt
MrMarco1002 1 year ago
Hmm lets see production times for vehicles: Fastest Nissan round the track : 7:26.70 Nissan GT-R. Fastest Honda :7:56.773 Honda NSX-R NA2 .Just a little way off you dumb bitch. A Nissan GT-R Spec-V did it in 7:25 which even a honda bike couldnt match.
90sideways 1 year ago
@Turbo06Sedan lol what a dumbass go look up the 2010 honda accord vtec v6:) its like a nissan 350z v6 just over 240 torqe and 260hp
kalel389 1 year ago
change out the gears in the s2000 and it might get up faster
Mangobrain82 1 year ago
What is a honda even good for? Not dragging or drifting and barely cuts it on the track. Just an old grannies car I think.
90sideways 1 year ago
@90sideways your fucking stupid! go read mags.....circuit hero, win every year! super lap battle wins most of the time!,the super gt leauge our new sports car that just came out this year the honda HSV(honda sports velocity) is whippin ass i hate dumbass people who dont know shit about cars read import tuner,street tuner,honda tunning,modified mag,dsport!!! you might learn somthing!
kalel389 1 year ago
@kalel389 8:38 Honda NSX Sport Auto, (08/1997) 8:39 Honda S2000 round the nurburgring ther slow as fuck you dumb cunt gay fwd pieces of shit if you wana be fats around the track you need 4wd Nigger! Prolli fast in the gay honda class LOL
90sideways 1 year ago
lol you know nothing! read your books circuit hero,super lap battle,import tuner,d sport,honda tunning,super street,modified mag!...all these show your piece of shit rwd cars getn theire ass whiped ooooo drive in a str8 line wtf thats no damn fun!...honda nsx is old but its mighty funny how the nsx set the record at that track and the new honda hsv rwd!!!!! owns that fucking track! biatcchhh!!!
kalel389 1 year ago
@kalel389 Hahah books mean nothing! Facts are everything! The only fast honda around the Nürburgring is a superbike [Honda VFR750R] although the nxc-r did a 7:56.73 which is still slow as fuck. you need 4wd nigggggggga
90sideways 1 year ago
@90sideways yeah we need 4wd when we beat the shit outa the gtr skyline awd,the evo!, and the suby! and your so fucking dumb!! the book shows live picutres of them racing and it on the track in first place and saying in 4 dif mag titles that hey honda did this!...i think thats facts and when theres vids you dumb bitch
kalel389 1 year ago
@90sideways um both the s2k and nsx which you just listed are rwd...
getrapedpmfl69 1 year ago
@getrapedpmfl69 and? I know that
90sideways 1 year ago
Wtf is up with this "power vs torque", it's clear as crystal that it's always horsepower for the win.
You only need a few meters long torque wrench, push it down a little, and theres like 400 Nm torque for you.
To achieve horsepower, the real deal, you need to get rpm and rotation. Then you really get going.
But the best tune-up ever, is to make the car lighter. Period.
SorsanSuuriAfro 1 year ago
Now this is my question Is it stock block??
and how realizable is it. Thinking about to do the same think
steve088 1 year ago
man you should of kept the vid going, seem like it was about to get even better
718boyz 1 year ago
Is this car on stock compression? How much power can an s2000 make safely on stock compression / stock motor. Via turbo that is.
thegarbageman21 1 year ago
this vid make me thinking about homer simpson driving while its his father's face in the mirror
KoralieMegan 1 year ago
i know where this was video love the s2000
WhoSpraysAreYouGay 1 year ago
@iLikePorNOOBraphy i think it's a 4x4 fully loaded plus a canoe on top
vproduction 1 year ago
that third gear is a b**** huh lol
SRT4Honda0 1 year ago
actually its a chev suv wich makes it worse ... i could d that walking baha
240sxRule 1 year ago
i am starting to really like these cars! :D
antonio6589 1 year ago 23
damn thats sick
philyphil2c 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fucking ricer
goldfishfred84 2 years ago
Typical Yank reply
fantasticmyself 2 years ago
No torque = better know how to work the gearbox for racing, and i think thats true racing.
iRnoCracker 2 years ago
@iRnoCracker jus seems as though he needs slicks
my civic does this. the tires jus slip the whole time through boost
turboturtle22 2 years ago
i was just trying to say that i think true racing is using the gearbox and not relying on torque to help you when ur in the rong gear inn a turn and such.
iRnoCracker 2 years ago
Comment removed
tilus75 1 year ago
*wiggles pinky* *giggles* But got the balls to drive like that in a vert.
GaRy13eaR 2 years ago
@adkos79: point well made.
dre1507 2 years ago
man your pretty cool
raidacaipo 2 years ago
well said bro finally someone who thinks like me !
TheMugenboy 2 years ago
very nice!
V8lol 2 years ago
2.4L are you a dumbass its a f20c 2.0 liter buddy
0wnage1111 2 years ago
@0wnage1111 or 2.2 in 04+ in the US
labelskate102 2 years ago
whats it matter if its got hardly any torque just fuckin drop it down a gear.
jannisSTREET 2 years ago
Comment removed
acid808 2 years ago
hehe howd i know that after reading the vid description the people would rant about torque, yes that is a HORRIBLE TQ rating, kind of makes the turbo pointless...
Elementtechnical 2 years ago
2 Ways to make power. Carry torque higher, or make more torque. This car is probably on < 10 lbs or so but it revs to the moon so it can make shitloads of power without to much boost.
lightningxx 2 years ago 3
17 psi
snowmants 2 years ago
@lightningxx i'm sorry friend, but nothin you just said makes sense.
20Luder00 1 year ago
@20Luder00 How so? HP is a math calculation. Torque * RPM / 5252.
lightningxx 1 year ago
s2k's are nice....
chrisevolution8 2 years ago 3
If you were to look at the area under the power curve of a Honda F1 engine and compare to that of a stock F20C engine you might be surprised. Coincidentally even the "torquier" F22C1 engine's torque peak is only at 162 ft-lbs.
eikichi2009 2 years ago
F1 engines make only about 250 lb-ft of torque as well... must mean F1 cars are slow because they are "torqueless".
eikichi2009 2 years ago 7
While that may be true, F1 cars also weigh about 1500 pounds less than an S2000. When you weigh barely more than 1300 pounds, it doesn't take much torque to get you moving. On the street and engine like that is still virtually useless, albeit fun as shit on the highway when you get the chance to use all the power.
ulfwafflestein 2 years ago
Comment removed
eikichi2009 2 years ago
Comment removed
eikichi2009 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Honda's are torqueless. Always been that way.
To strathpol, you are wrong with your definition of torque.
Easily Put, Horse Power = How fast you go.
Torque = How fast you get there.
Turbo06Sedan 2 years ago
More like power output and
how fast you reach that power output.
snowmants 2 years ago 38
@snowmants well put ... the comment before you made no sense
groundhabit 1 year ago
@Turbo06Sedan Formula 1 cars barely have any torque. just high end hp. and theyre unbeatable rockets
VivaLaNick335 1 year ago
@Turbo06Sedan What U wrote is too simple...
This shows reality more: Torque * Rev / 9980 = Horsepower
Dingomoto 1 year ago
Comment removed
kalel389 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Turbo06Sedan @Turbo06Sedan lol what a dumbass go look up the 2010 honda accord vtec v6:) its like a nissan 350z v6 just over 240 torqe and 260hp
kalel389 1 year ago
@Turbo06Sedan
Its a 2ltr engine with 4 cylinders. What the fuck do you expect?
mikespike502005 1 year ago
Comment removed
Sploogi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Turbo06Sedan
Hp does not equal how fast you go...
Hp = How fast your making torque at a given rpm. Thats as simplified as it gets.
Honda's make less toque per revolution of the crank, but because the crank revolves so fast, the gear ratios make the torque that you feel in the seat of your pants. The only difference is you get to experience shifting to 9000rpm through 6 gears, not to mention easy drive-ability and decent mpg at lower rpm.
"Honda's are torqueless."
Pretty ignorant statement
Sploogi 1 year ago
@Turbo06Sedan not trying to start anything but not all hondas are torqueless i have a f22a turbo accord with 250whp and 269wtq. im just saying.
keoni96826 1 year ago
@Turbo06Sedan now thats stupid. Torque how fast you get there? So your saying a deisel truck making 400whp and 700ft-lbs is faster then a car making 700whp and 400 ft-lbs?
lightningxx 1 year ago
@lightningxx You are clearly forgetting weight.
Turbo06Sedan 1 year ago
@Turbo06Sedan Ok fine assuming the same weight?
lightningxx 1 year ago
@Turbo06Sedan my 4 banger civic makes 536 torque to the wheels. doesnt seem torqueless
MarcelE85EG 1 year ago
s2000 are shit in torque no power off the line but pull hard in top end
challengersrt8vszr1 2 years ago
im sorry but 255wtq?
S14VH45 2 years ago
that was some mad accel.. holy shit.
jaggajatt08 2 years ago
what hell your talking about not 400hp man you can clearly tell that shit is going fast...maybe your computer is fucken slow or old.
kcivic06 2 years ago
Its because it makes no torque. Torque is what actually moves a car and gets it to speed, power just keeps it there
GMdrivingMOPARguy 2 years ago
power is a relationship between tq and rpm. the faster your rotate a tire or shaft the less tq is has... power tells you that at a certain rpm it has x amount of tq. debating that a car with more crank tq will be faster than a car with less but more power is stupid as fuck. I can promise you have no background in power or any similair fields... power always wins. otherwise it defies all the laws of physics that are used in this 3d world... you right though, tq is what moves a car but
BMendenhall84 2 years ago
a 500hp car will -put down more tq than a 300hp car will at any out put shaft speed REGARDLESS OF CRANK TQ. i dont want to fight, just enluighten you. if i increase the output shaft speed by 2, i decrease the tq by 2. so having 100tq@2000rpms is just the same as 50tq@4000rpms. to simple argue that the more crank tq means you win, its ignorant and misleading. this is why they use tqxrpm. it is a relationship. making 200tq@8000rpms is 2 times better than 400tq@2000rpms.. learn before you type
BMendenhall84 2 years ago
soooooooo what are you saying in easy terms....
gwadd85 2 years ago
Ok so im not "formally educated" it physics due to i dropped out at 16 but from all my personal expearence its torque that wins. I know nothing about these japanese cars, im a diehard muscle fan, but from everything ive seen its the cars with big engines and lots of torque that always win. Power only being the defining factor between each other. In drag racing, torque is power
GMdrivingMOPARguy 2 years ago
i agree, but they easily take them in the corners especially s2ks, the most formula cars are V6 s-turbo set up making around 950 hp
kapulette 2 years ago
F1 cars have 2.4l V8 engines.
matpilch 2 years ago
well take your own advice and get educated... hanging out with cars doesnt teach you the physics of which run those machines...using gearing, a car with more power will have more shaft tq than a lower powered car. 300tq@3000rpms vs 200tq@6000rpms. using a 2:1 ratio reduces the 6,000rpms to 3000. thus multiplying the 200tq by 2. the 200tq@6,000 thus becomes 400tq@3000rpms. hense why 200tq@6000 makes MORE POWER! learn something so you can teach someone something
BMendenhall84 2 years ago
Torque is only good for putting the foot down without downshifting (for example over taking on the freeway). Torque runs out straight after.. its just like a push...
strathpol 2 years ago
What your saying is true, but there are exceptions though. Just cause you have more BHP does not always mean you will have more TQ. A Semi can have as much as 430BHP but can put out as much as 2400Lbs of torque and they only ever turn around 2000 rpm and thats if you wanna hit the rev limiter. , But yes for the most part you are very correct though. But a output shaft speed of 1000RPMS at lets say 1200TQ with only 430BHP will be more then 500BHP with 400TQ at 1000RPM. But yes you are correct
SSshane6d9 2 years ago
a 240 bhp s2000 has less torque than a 200bhp bmw 325i
strathpol 2 years ago
Wow that thing is fast
superartus 2 years ago
what BOV are you running?
Boosted2k 2 years ago
ahahha
wtf is up with the torque
juuvvy 2 years ago
dat lil shit is kuik. nice ride.
killakev0491 2 years ago
sweet ride bro..good luck with it
ScorpiosRevenge1 2 years ago
yea and then HP comes in and kicks the crap out of your high torque car......
h1gh0ct4n3 2 years ago 11
wonder how much he had to spend to get that much hp,and dude its a s2k the torque on those things suck.
nomellocreampig 2 years ago
yeah honda's dont have Torque but thats why theyre so light weight. high revving light weight..if ur overweight honda is definitely not the car you'd wanna race with
heyhey20202020 2 years ago
imagine all the traction you can put down with that weight HAHA
clumbzlbc 2 years ago
@clumbzlbc thats if its rwd. if not all that weight is sent to the rear wheels who really dont need it. LOL. so i guess in the case of an s2k, that weight wouldnt be a bad idea. LOL.
dre1507 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
255 WTQ? obviously no engine work done, damn low torque hondas lol
poonannidanny 2 years ago
spelt and spelled are two different words which mean the same thing because one is british spelling while the other is american. just like sulphur and sulfur.
XiaoNoodles 2 years ago
cool story bro
idylan9 2 years ago
car takes off slow ,makes alot of noise but i guess it hauls ass once it gets going it looks like
cradlerofdeath 2 years ago
its a 4 banger, high rpm. I bet the top speed is ridiculous. The torque figures arent the same as lets say... a V8 with the initial surge in power you may be referring to, A vette posts similar torque figures as hp... or not depending on who you ask...
asieljason 2 years ago
i bet that GT35 has a nice pull to it
777mikecc 2 years ago
How loud is this kit outside the vehicle? What do you think is the likely hood that a cop will pull you over if u drove past?
DanhNguyenster64 2 years ago
"overtake" not really a big deal. My dad did it with his slow Toyota Matrix. But S2000 with GT35R, that's sick!
calvinblinkee 2 years ago 7
Hey!! That was me he overtook in his matrix!! That's a bad ass matrix!! :-)
Alshaytan666 2 years ago
Comment removed
erinlovee93 2 years ago
Youve not driven one before then. Its a fucking 2L 4cyl engine what do you expect you fat siberian prick. Fucking cunt.
Did you mean Economy ?
mikespike502005 2 years ago
whats a "cunt" ?
Tschingy 2 years ago
male => dick
girl => cunt
Brunodu68 2 years ago 2
Kk
lol xD
Tschingy 2 years ago