@suddenlyitsobvious I know your comment is old.. But think of her shirt this way, millions of people have this virus and there is still a stigma around HIV of "I don't like this". Her shirt is kinda sending a message, it is out there and you will listen, goddamit, even if you think it is dirty, untasteful and pushed in your face! Because for the people living with HIV/AIDS, those are the facts of HIV. It is put upon them, usually in unsatisfactory ways.
In reality, people testing for HIV may have positive test-results due to a VERY large set of issues, such as alcohol hangover, malaria, herpes, tick-bite, residual cocaine in the system etc etc etc that cross-react with the tests (PLURAL) that are not specific at all.
They subsequently are fed extremely toxic drugs and when they get seriously immuno-compromised, it is simply attributed to a lethal virus.
...BELIEVE anything they are told when it's authority promoting the narrative, and BELIEVE NOTHING when someone else does, and the problem here is people are for a variety of reasons NOT equipped to do their own thinking, using their own minds.
AIDS-deaths are considered by an overwhelming majority of people as PROOF of the existence of a virus, but they've never actually looked into how UTTERLY fraudulent the science promoting this virus is.
Again, I quite realize that attacking a social dogma such as HIV/AIDS exposes one to hysterical rage of the masses, but really, anyone simply doing the MOST BASIC homework on what AZT is for instance -the trash they gave to countless homosexuals in amazing doses- should start to THINK.
Do people really think that the system is SO CONCERNED about people in Africa, who when sick are ACTUALLY SICK NOT because of some virus, but because of deficient nutrition/ unclean..
Any such person taking a test will automatically test positive. They are then being fed hypertoxic drugs and when in the end they die people simply suppose this PROVES the existence of the virus and assume the drugs actually PROLONGED the life-span...
It's really quite amazing!
The lethality of drugs has been reduced today because in the late 80s/early 90s people couldn't survive on them for more than a few years max.
Obviously, it's more interesting for BigPharma to see HIV-positives survive a few decades on the pills rather than 6 months, which partly explains why their lethality has been reduced, but perhaps the more crucial motivation being that it is suggested that people can today 'live with HIV', that treatment works, which of course promotes people's belief and trust in the medical system and continue to buy into this completely bankrupt lie.
@suddenlyitsobvious So you are saying, basically that AIDS is not caused by the HIV virus but by the medication people are given?? What a load of BULLCRAP. And bad living conditions doesn't cause a positive HIV test. And you talk about giving countless homosexuals AZT.. Well, I know of cases of women, children and STRAIGHT men being given such medication as well. The reason that medication was substandard was because no one knew much about HIV/AIDS then.
@suddenlyitsobvious maybe you should infect yourself with the disease and see how long you last without the Pharamaceutical drugs. It's conspiracy theories like yours that cause problems. So what if it was an experiment gone wrong then, nowdays, its here and its killing people! You're mad to suggest it doesn't exist. What was it, then that killed multiple, healthy, western people in the 80s/90s??
The problem here is that you don't know anything about the issue at all, never THOUGHT about it, never READ a scientific paper about it...
You can't even process what I am saying, apparently figuring everything going against the grain is part of ONE SAME BIG CONSPIRACY-THEORY, which is why you confuse my post with the 'synthetic killer virus made in a CIA-lab'-theory:
'So what if it was an experiment gone wrong then, nowdays, its here and its killing people'
'What was it, then that killed multiple, healthy, western people in the 80s/90s?? '
It's very simple. Note first of all that it's simply NOT a question at all of a virus randomly killing random people -as you no doubt believe since you are obviously a very politically correct person and it's politically correct to mantrically repeat that EVERYBODY can get this 'virus' -which would after all be expected of a sexually transmittable virus.
That overwhelmingly, ONLY certain specific groups 'catch' this 'virus'.
It started with inner city gays, then a few other categories were added -junkies, people with blood issues- and then the entire subsaharian part of the African continent was colonized by this narrative.
Straight people SIMPLY DON'T get AIDS, unless something quite special is going on.
And yeah, I know you're immediately gonna reply that 'IT'S CRAZY TO SAY...
...STRAIGHTS DON'T GET AIDS BECAUSE BLA BLA BLA' but if you look at society honestly, it should be easy to pick up that GAYS, JUNKIES and HEMOPHILIACS are the affected groups, meaning the 'virus' apparently has a 'preference'.
Thes groups were ALREADY INGESTING toxic drugs BEFORE the 'virus' showed up and ALREADY had immune-system problems; the lifestyle of gays in the 70s/ early 80s is simply unimaginable to a good and no doubt very young lad as yourself.
These inner city gays had ALREADY BEEN subjected to all sorts of 'preventive vaccination campaigns' (hepatitus and soforth) and medical treatment against VD's and it is among these homosexuals, especially the ones largely abusing POPPERS, that NEW HEALTH PROBLEMS surfaced, such as Karposi's Sarcoma, a rare cancer often located close to the nose -close to the site the POPPERS were inhaled.
These health problems IN HIGHLY PROMISCUOUS NIGHTLIFE -GAYS EXCLUSIVELY...
...were soon used by the medical establishment and namely, the CANCER-establishment, to justify its own existence, scare the population to death with a mysterious new threat, and control society.
Indeed, cancer research had since decades focused on a VIRAL HYPOTHESIS of causation of cancer, and their research (billions of dollars worth) had completely failed.
YES, you're hearing this correctly: for decades all cancer research focused on finding a VIRUS.
Of course, they never found it, which was making the entire establishment look increasingly redundant.
It was THIS establishment that generated the 'HIV is a dangerous virus' dogma -with all the help from politics and media of course.
In the early/mid 80s, there were in reality a few thousands of gay men only caving in to the lifestyle basically, and if this seems like a lot to you, keep in mind that the COMBINED gay-scenes of places like NY, San Francisco, LA,...
...Paris, Rome etc contains obviously a few MILLIONS of people, so there really weren't that much casualties.
It was only after 87, when millions of gays were given a failed cancer drug, the HYPER-TOXIC AZT, that the epidemic really took off & was subsequently moved to Africa
I can't spend too much time on this & suggest if you REALLY care about people, perhaps it would be a good idea to trust authority a bit less, your own brains a bit more & actually look into it.
What it boils down to is it's simply a con; they've devised an unspecific testing system comprised of two tests (NOT: one test finding a virus, nooo: TWO tests), that will basically measure activity of the immune system, and the presence of a 'virus' is INFERRED, it is not actually FOUND, or shown to be there.
AIDS is a DEFINITION, it means having a positive test result plus one or more of a very large set of AIDS-defining conditions -30 or more, and they differ...
The endresult of all this is that when a starving subsaharian African had tuberculosis back in the 70s, he simply had tuberculosis.
TODAY, he is an AIDS-patient because tuberculosis is one of the AIDS-defining conditions.
What's so 'great' about this is that the establishment can actually add 'aids-defining' conditions at will; this was for instance done in 1994, resulting in an IMMEDIATELY DOUBLING of the number of AIDS-cases.
Be honest, you don't know enough about this at all, you're just trusting authority -as people always do.
If you DARE, why don't you simply start looking into what AZT is, really try to grasp with your mind what it is and how it functions & then wonder: is THIS what they gave to gays as treatment?!
THINK.
(Unfortunately most people can't do this...)
And for the record, I'm not BELIEVING something or someone. The case is PERFECTLY obvious to anyone who dares see it.
The reason AIDS is so low in the Middle Eastern arab countries, is because it's against cultural patterns to discuss and medicalize sex, wherefore people don't get tested, wherefore they don't BECOME seropositives and as a result, don't take toxic drugs and don't become sick.
The AIDS scare only can work long term if it affects a few minorities/rejects. If the system would tell a large segment of the STRAIGHT population they had a terrible virus, the narrative...
...would soon collapse, because it would become too obvious to straights that other straights NOT TAKING TREATMENT don't get sick, while THEY THEMSELVES wake up each morning vomiting and with head aches...Soon everybody would stop taking pills.
Seeing gays have been scared to death, are relatively isolated in society and the gay-scene completely promotes AIDS, it was difficult for them to escape the brainwash.
...years ago and NOT taking drugs. THEY are the ones who survibed the massacre.
There are more gays today getting the picture, but the propaganda is very strong, especially since today most people have simply grown up from the cradle with the supposed reality of this 'virus'...Too hard to question...
What a shame they didn't allow her true fans to be in the audience. The audience was full of stuffy, old people who probably have never even bought even one of her songs.
I wanna meet herr... :) I love Eurythmics, and I love Annie Lennox. I know I always will, but I just wish I could meet her. She's such a good person, and makes me smile. :]
she has made so much thru her greatest active years in music always with meaning, soul and ethic, and fuck the songs are awesome and just timeless, Dave is an admirable creator, and Annie well she's a true Legend in my book, I love this woman!
Is interesting how the internet is world wide, yet i can not see videos on this site, all because they've been blocked for my region. F#*K YOU Sony! keep doing this and artist who are truly talented will be losing popularity.
she's all nervous and breathless, didn't expect that
sirvidia 3 weeks ago
Is it just more is she really easy on the eyes and ears?
cjwright79 2 months ago
Comment removed
21sharnbrooke 4 months ago
her accent is very similar to a West Indian accent.interesting
brokecreole 5 months ago
i love her eyes!! and her voice and ..okay i just love her ^_^
Matchfyre 6 months ago
a wonderful singer, a wonderful woman, a wonderful soul
brunitodf 6 months ago
Very driven lady ... incredibly talented, but also vulnerable, no wonder she keeps to herself. The kind of person a bad shrink could really screw up.
CusterFlux 8 months ago
i love er voice
LizAndyMovieWatcher 9 months ago
What an erratic, stressful interview, it's definitely not working and I think Lennox's choice of T-shirt is very misguided.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 year ago
@suddenlyitsobvious I know your comment is old.. But think of her shirt this way, millions of people have this virus and there is still a stigma around HIV of "I don't like this". Her shirt is kinda sending a message, it is out there and you will listen, goddamit, even if you think it is dirty, untasteful and pushed in your face! Because for the people living with HIV/AIDS, those are the facts of HIV. It is put upon them, usually in unsatisfactory ways.
crazedbirdy9 2 months ago
@crazedbirdy9
'this virus'
In reality, people testing for HIV may have positive test-results due to a VERY large set of issues, such as alcohol hangover, malaria, herpes, tick-bite, residual cocaine in the system etc etc etc that cross-react with the tests (PLURAL) that are not specific at all.
They subsequently are fed extremely toxic drugs and when they get seriously immuno-compromised, it is simply attributed to a lethal virus.
I quite realize that people will simply...
suddenlyitsobvious 2 months ago
@crazedbirdy9
...BELIEVE anything they are told when it's authority promoting the narrative, and BELIEVE NOTHING when someone else does, and the problem here is people are for a variety of reasons NOT equipped to do their own thinking, using their own minds.
AIDS-deaths are considered by an overwhelming majority of people as PROOF of the existence of a virus, but they've never actually looked into how UTTERLY fraudulent the science promoting this virus is.
suddenlyitsobvious 2 months ago
@crazedbirdy9
Again, I quite realize that attacking a social dogma such as HIV/AIDS exposes one to hysterical rage of the masses, but really, anyone simply doing the MOST BASIC homework on what AZT is for instance -the trash they gave to countless homosexuals in amazing doses- should start to THINK.
Do people really think that the system is SO CONCERNED about people in Africa, who when sick are ACTUALLY SICK NOT because of some virus, but because of deficient nutrition/ unclean..
suddenlyitsobvious 2 months ago
@crazedbirdy9
...drinking water and awful sanitary conditions.
Any such person taking a test will automatically test positive. They are then being fed hypertoxic drugs and when in the end they die people simply suppose this PROVES the existence of the virus and assume the drugs actually PROLONGED the life-span...
It's really quite amazing!
The lethality of drugs has been reduced today because in the late 80s/early 90s people couldn't survive on them for more than a few years max.
suddenlyitsobvious 2 months ago
@crazedbirdy9
Obviously, it's more interesting for BigPharma to see HIV-positives survive a few decades on the pills rather than 6 months, which partly explains why their lethality has been reduced, but perhaps the more crucial motivation being that it is suggested that people can today 'live with HIV', that treatment works, which of course promotes people's belief and trust in the medical system and continue to buy into this completely bankrupt lie.
suddenlyitsobvious 2 months ago
@suddenlyitsobvious So you are saying, basically that AIDS is not caused by the HIV virus but by the medication people are given?? What a load of BULLCRAP. And bad living conditions doesn't cause a positive HIV test. And you talk about giving countless homosexuals AZT.. Well, I know of cases of women, children and STRAIGHT men being given such medication as well. The reason that medication was substandard was because no one knew much about HIV/AIDS then.
crazedbirdy9 2 months ago
@suddenlyitsobvious maybe you should infect yourself with the disease and see how long you last without the Pharamaceutical drugs. It's conspiracy theories like yours that cause problems. So what if it was an experiment gone wrong then, nowdays, its here and its killing people! You're mad to suggest it doesn't exist. What was it, then that killed multiple, healthy, western people in the 80s/90s??
crazedbirdy9 2 months ago
Comment removed
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@crazedbirdy9
The problem here is that you don't know anything about the issue at all, never THOUGHT about it, never READ a scientific paper about it...
You can't even process what I am saying, apparently figuring everything going against the grain is part of ONE SAME BIG CONSPIRACY-THEORY, which is why you confuse my post with the 'synthetic killer virus made in a CIA-lab'-theory:
'So what if it was an experiment gone wrong then, nowdays, its here and its killing people'
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@crazedbirdy9
'What was it, then that killed multiple, healthy, western people in the 80s/90s?? '
It's very simple. Note first of all that it's simply NOT a question at all of a virus randomly killing random people -as you no doubt believe since you are obviously a very politically correct person and it's politically correct to mantrically repeat that EVERYBODY can get this 'virus' -which would after all be expected of a sexually transmittable virus.
WHAT do the epidemio-
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
...logical FACT instead show?
That overwhelmingly, ONLY certain specific groups 'catch' this 'virus'.
It started with inner city gays, then a few other categories were added -junkies, people with blood issues- and then the entire subsaharian part of the African continent was colonized by this narrative.
Straight people SIMPLY DON'T get AIDS, unless something quite special is going on.
And yeah, I know you're immediately gonna reply that 'IT'S CRAZY TO SAY...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
...STRAIGHTS DON'T GET AIDS BECAUSE BLA BLA BLA' but if you look at society honestly, it should be easy to pick up that GAYS, JUNKIES and HEMOPHILIACS are the affected groups, meaning the 'virus' apparently has a 'preference'.
Thes groups were ALREADY INGESTING toxic drugs BEFORE the 'virus' showed up and ALREADY had immune-system problems; the lifestyle of gays in the 70s/ early 80s is simply unimaginable to a good and no doubt very young lad as yourself.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
These inner city gays had ALREADY BEEN subjected to all sorts of 'preventive vaccination campaigns' (hepatitus and soforth) and medical treatment against VD's and it is among these homosexuals, especially the ones largely abusing POPPERS, that NEW HEALTH PROBLEMS surfaced, such as Karposi's Sarcoma, a rare cancer often located close to the nose -close to the site the POPPERS were inhaled.
These health problems IN HIGHLY PROMISCUOUS NIGHTLIFE -GAYS EXCLUSIVELY...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
...were soon used by the medical establishment and namely, the CANCER-establishment, to justify its own existence, scare the population to death with a mysterious new threat, and control society.
Indeed, cancer research had since decades focused on a VIRAL HYPOTHESIS of causation of cancer, and their research (billions of dollars worth) had completely failed.
YES, you're hearing this correctly: for decades all cancer research focused on finding a VIRUS.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
Of course, they never found it, which was making the entire establishment look increasingly redundant.
It was THIS establishment that generated the 'HIV is a dangerous virus' dogma -with all the help from politics and media of course.
In the early/mid 80s, there were in reality a few thousands of gay men only caving in to the lifestyle basically, and if this seems like a lot to you, keep in mind that the COMBINED gay-scenes of places like NY, San Francisco, LA,...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
...Paris, Rome etc contains obviously a few MILLIONS of people, so there really weren't that much casualties.
It was only after 87, when millions of gays were given a failed cancer drug, the HYPER-TOXIC AZT, that the epidemic really took off & was subsequently moved to Africa
I can't spend too much time on this & suggest if you REALLY care about people, perhaps it would be a good idea to trust authority a bit less, your own brains a bit more & actually look into it.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
What it boils down to is it's simply a con; they've devised an unspecific testing system comprised of two tests (NOT: one test finding a virus, nooo: TWO tests), that will basically measure activity of the immune system, and the presence of a 'virus' is INFERRED, it is not actually FOUND, or shown to be there.
AIDS is a DEFINITION, it means having a positive test result plus one or more of a very large set of AIDS-defining conditions -30 or more, and they differ...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
...per continent.
The endresult of all this is that when a starving subsaharian African had tuberculosis back in the 70s, he simply had tuberculosis.
TODAY, he is an AIDS-patient because tuberculosis is one of the AIDS-defining conditions.
What's so 'great' about this is that the establishment can actually add 'aids-defining' conditions at will; this was for instance done in 1994, resulting in an IMMEDIATELY DOUBLING of the number of AIDS-cases.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
Be honest, you don't know enough about this at all, you're just trusting authority -as people always do.
If you DARE, why don't you simply start looking into what AZT is, really try to grasp with your mind what it is and how it functions & then wonder: is THIS what they gave to gays as treatment?!
THINK.
(Unfortunately most people can't do this...)
And for the record, I'm not BELIEVING something or someone. The case is PERFECTLY obvious to anyone who dares see it.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
Oh sorry, I see you're a girl...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
The reason AIDS is so low in the Middle Eastern arab countries, is because it's against cultural patterns to discuss and medicalize sex, wherefore people don't get tested, wherefore they don't BECOME seropositives and as a result, don't take toxic drugs and don't become sick.
The AIDS scare only can work long term if it affects a few minorities/rejects. If the system would tell a large segment of the STRAIGHT population they had a terrible virus, the narrative...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
...would soon collapse, because it would become too obvious to straights that other straights NOT TAKING TREATMENT don't get sick, while THEY THEMSELVES wake up each morning vomiting and with head aches...Soon everybody would stop taking pills.
Seeing gays have been scared to death, are relatively isolated in society and the gay-scene completely promotes AIDS, it was difficult for them to escape the brainwash.
I know several HIV positive gays diagnosed 25...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@crazedbirdy9
...years ago and NOT taking drugs. THEY are the ones who survibed the massacre.
There are more gays today getting the picture, but the propaganda is very strong, especially since today most people have simply grown up from the cradle with the supposed reality of this 'virus'...Too hard to question...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
Strange, how some people you´ve never met personally, just get to you..
2fishfactory 1 year ago 2
What a wonderful person!
McHunt7 1 year ago
a legend
mmaxsters 1 year ago
What a shame they didn't allow her true fans to be in the audience. The audience was full of stuffy, old people who probably have never even bought even one of her songs.
Iceblooo 1 year ago 3
Finally she came up!
Let's do it, sweetie, God Bless you!
XXX
jeffblash 1 year ago
I wanna meet herr... :) I love Eurythmics, and I love Annie Lennox. I know I always will, but I just wish I could meet her. She's such a good person, and makes me smile. :]
BrittanyJackson19 1 year ago
Annie has kept herself in fantastic shape. For a woman of 55, she looks amazing. Power to her!
sirtinycreep 1 year ago
She had some piercing eyes in sweet dreams
sandythebear 1 year ago
@sandythebear her "aggressive" haircut as she puts it and her hair color and her makeup enhance her piercing eyes.
thedarthflagger 1 year ago
much respect for this woman, and what a great singer she is.
ricotermonen 1 year ago 11
The best female singer ever....
WanNug 1 year ago 17
she has made so much thru her greatest active years in music always with meaning, soul and ethic, and fuck the songs are awesome and just timeless, Dave is an admirable creator, and Annie well she's a true Legend in my book, I love this woman!
NAIVADA 1 year ago
Hi Ino!
Danke Dir, daß Du diese Sendung mit Annie hier eingestellt hast.
Gruß, Ingrid
itritsch 1 year ago
Is interesting how the internet is world wide, yet i can not see videos on this site, all because they've been blocked for my region. F#*K YOU Sony! keep doing this and artist who are truly talented will be losing popularity.
vidaone 1 year ago 3
Thank you for sharing. Wonderfulllllll!!!!!!!!
iedaderrico 1 year ago
Thank you Ino. How can you not love this woman?
CARMSFAV 1 year ago
fabulous woman! ♀
ritalin1974 1 year ago