Federer Vs Djokovic US Open 2007

[MJTheKing95]

the music ruins the video u.u

[sasuke1994pown]

Beast Hair!

[hencar2]

who else hate djokovic parents....

[misterlonely1446]

no music in tennis videos. the sound of the racquets, footwork and the audience is good enough.

[dan72155]

fed looks cool all in black, shame he is wearing pink this year.

[federerbestclass]

Ｒｏｇｅｒ　ｉｓ the classic greatest.  love Roger

[PabasamDee]

Say what you will about Djokovic, but he doesnt seem like a sore loser. Id have been so pissed to lose those first two sets.

[TJFederer15]

oops i meant to say the beautiful point is at 5:37

[TJFederer15]

What a beautiful point from fed, i love it when he jst fully opens his shoulders and jst smashes the ball so cleanly off the forehand side like in this point.

[TJFederer15]

Federer will go down as a more "talented player" as it were cos he is able to bring a more classical, old-school style to an era of power play more than anything else and nadal is one of them. Nadal has a distinct advantage over federer being a lefty and the top-spin he puts on the ball going up high to his backhand is extremely hard to deal with having a one handed backhand especially on clay. This is the only reason why nadal has a winning record over fed.

[Thutmosis7]

@TJFederer15 Nadal just beat the best. He have a better h2h record against alot of playas out there. He is been off most of last yr due to the injury. It took him a while to find his true form. he isn't playing that defensive game he use to. He is more offensive and aggressive. Federer had the weakest era in tennis it's simple as that. He took advantage of it. I would of done the same if i was him.

[TJFederer15]

@Thutmosis7 - Thats utter bullshit, he was beating agassi, he had beaten sampras, he's effectivelly dominating the era today, in grand slams anyway with nadal. Nadal is more agressive yes, but the way he goes about things, he has to try so much harder than fed who goes through the rounds literally effortlessly in grand slams nyway. Nadal still uses his ol moon ballin effect against fed and nadal is much more boring to watch than fed.

[Thutmosis7]

@TJFederer15 Anyway like i said, it's the weakest era in tennis history. Federer beated a burned out pete sampras who was way passed his prime. Agassi is like 12 yrs older than federer. Agassi was way passed his prime too. After 2003 that was the end of agassi. Roddick was never in the top 10 on my radar. He is just another crappy playa. Hewitt burn out before before 03. Injury probably doom him and safin. Neither playa ever return back to top form.

[TJFederer15]

@Thutmosis7 - Look no mattr what, in 2006 and 2007 he was simply the best ever bettr than nyone it doesnt mattr what era he was in, jst by watching him u cud tell he cud of beaten nyone in there primes and not many people wud argue against me. He is the best becuase he never burns out and has contiued with virtual perfect fitness and is still dominating the grand slams. fed is the greatest as even sampras, agassi, borg, laver, mcenroe said so!

[Thutmosis7]

@TJFederer15 Laver didn't say that. Sampras and agassi will say anything. Borg said he is the best of this era. Never all time. Federer couldn't beat laver in his prime, or sampras. He had the weakest era in tennis history.

[TJFederer15]

@Thutmosis7 - Borg did say federer is the greatest at a poll with navratilova on whose the greatest and laver said if fed wins the french he will go down as the greatest and he's done jst that, so lets stop having this lil argument.

[TJFederer15]

@Thutmosis7 - Nyway, weakest era? compared to fed ye. Just cos they are getting older now, roddick is still up there, hewitt is getting on and has had many hip operations so thats gunna be an obvious hiderance.

[89Pleasek]

What makes you think this is the weakest era?Tennis is more competitive each year, it evolves naturally,so stop saying it was weak just to support your lame arguements.

Say in the 90's, if there are so many champions it doesn't mean that the era is super strong, it means that it sucks and nobody has the game to dominate. Even Sampras couldn't dominate on fast surfaces cause he relied on his serve too much. Federer can win majors with a not working serve or forehand cause he has other weapons

[89Pleasek]

The weakest era? It's the strongest era ever! Federer just makes it look average cause he's the greatest player out there by a mile. If you need to go through Ferrero, Roddick, Safin, Agassi, Nalbandian, Hewitt, Nadal, Djokovic, Del Potro, Murray to win your majors and you still win nearly all of them that means that you're the fuking goat so shut the fuck up cause you know nothing. The weakest era was the 1990's when there was only Sampras, unconsistant Agassi and an old Becker.

[TJFederer15]

@89Pleasek - Well Said mate, completely agree with you.

[Rafathaman94]

@TJFederer15 Of course you would agree with another federer fan.

[TJFederer15]

@Rafathaman94 - Yup ; )

[Thutmosis7]

@89Pleasek This is the weakest era. Hewitt, ferrero, roddick, agassi, nalbandian, djoko, murray are not great playas. Del is injured, so i have to wait till he is back. Hewitt stop being a great playa since 03. Pete sampras era was the hardest. There is no Goat about federer. He play in a weak era it's as simple as that. Stop making this era out to be great. He won when competition was weak period. He never won when there were 4 or more multiple champions? The only competition is nadal.

[89Pleasek]

Tell me what's so special about the Sampras era? Who did he have to face to win his majors? Chang? Ivanisevic? Are you kidding me? The only players Sampras had to worry about was Agassi (who was inconsistant) and Becker in 95-96 (who was old and out of his prime anyway). Where's the competition? Where? Federer would smack everyone from the Sampras's era including Pete himself.

[Thutmosis7]

@89Pleasek I don't think federer would of won 5 grandslam in pete's era. He probably would of been with maybe 3. Pete's era of tennis was more competive than federer. It's just the fact. Even the 80's was much more stronger than federer. You fedites need to face reality. Look what happen today? He lose to hewitt, who is way pass his prime.

[89Pleasek]

Omfg I asked you for some names and you just keep repeating that the 90's era was stronger. It was stronger my ass, I bet you're a die hard Sampras fan who just cant accept that someones actually better than him. The competition in the 90's was so tough that Sampras in 1996 and 1998 has won only 1 Slam, no masters titles and still finished as the no 1 player. Know you need 2-3 slams and 2-3 masters series titles to think about the no 1 position. The level is 3 times as high as in the 90's.

[89Pleasek]

"Look what happen today? He lose to hewitt, who is way pass his prime. "

I dont want to remind you who Sampras lost to in his prime years on his favorite surface. Sampras didnt have to win every match but Federer on the other hand does? How retarted can you be?

[Thutmosis7]

@89Pleasek Crap!!!!!!

[Emiliosebas1993]

good video....please tell me what are the songs names...please...

[Emiliosebas1993]

What song is of the beginning and the next song please..tell me

[urkejoey89]

pakito moving on stereo living on video - THE NAME OF THE SONG FROM THE BEGINNING!!!!!!!

[JexPAuk]

Tennis without the tennis balls' sound is pointless to me :(

[ElectricalCloud]

love the video but dont love the songs but it doesnt matter

[AlphaDraconis7]

free tennis lesson for djokovic :)

[TJFederer15]

god he was serving insane in this match

[Thutmosis7]

@TJFederer15 No laver didn't say that. He said there is no greatest. He is just the best playa of his era, just like sampras was.

[cloudjingu]

songs list plz ^_^

[lulubert001]

how is the song at the beginning called?

[staewarsgenius]

they should name their kid Rafa!

[Jaishankar100]

Looks like the old Federer is already back ha ha

[Jaishankar100]

Well Federer did beat Nadal in madrid , Djoko is US and Murray in Cincy!!

They are no Bogeymen!! Federer is now their BOGEYMAN!!!!!!!

[MaKiri001]

Whe the title of the song and his lecturer 0:00/2:between 22 minutes???

Help please!!!

Thanks!!!

[charv3z]

Living on video by pakito

[clantssherwood]

that music of shit

[MaKiri001]

2 minutes a what kind of song sounds until 22 seconds???

What is the title of the song???

[Canamana42]

I think Rog/Mirka knows the child is going to be a boy, pretty sure they're not gonna name him Novak....lol. I think Rog LOVES tennis, but be clear in knowing that he wants to beat Novak a few more x before it's all said and done.....then they can be friends.....maybe...lol

[wageb]

ROGER is the best of history , YOU NEVER CAN COMPARE nadal to ROGER

[Strikerking8]

Lol

[MaKiri001]

music????????????????????????

[vladulienka]

the music is sick in this video.... crap

[Daver007]

eat your words......fed still got the nak

[charv3z]

is that y he won it last week?

[IricForset]

Well one would have to assume due to his poor form recently he wouldnt win it.. I was wrong

[charv3z]

thats what i thought.

[TibxB0i]

doesn't matter if he won it or not, federer is going to be number 3 once djokovic wins another australian open because he's 50 pts under fed

[xxboxx65]

Yet another wrong prediction

[TibxB0i]

it's ok, atleast nadal creamed him, he's the true number 1 rafael nadal

[martiniho12]

nadal is good but when federer was in his prime he would have owned nadal

[TibxB0i]

nadal isn't even in his prime so you can't compare. you're just being ignorant because you're so brain washed by federer and his fans. open your mind

[martiniho12]

brainwashed? all i said was that he would beat him if he was in his prime, you know im just showing some confidence, anyway nadal as it an age where he can't improve that much anymore. i've nothing agaisnt nadal but you say he's the true number one? just look at his competetion i mean roddick federer hewitt etc are past it now and other players arnt really up to it yet, anyway murray has beat him sevral times now and he's improving fast

[TibxB0i]

dude, your comments make no sense.  so you're saying federer would win if he was in his prime, well so would sampras or anyone who's that good such as nadal or agassi. so federer was at his prime at age 24 or 25. nadal is 22 and you're saying he's at an age where he can't improve much anymore? how do you know that? so bias and ignorant. True number one??? he won french open consecutively, won wimbledon, then beijing gold, then australian open. how can you say he's not number one.

[martiniho12]

federer has won the us open 5 times wimbledon 5 times and the austrailian open 3 times

[TibxB0i]

yeah and he's 28. nadal has a lot too and he's only 22. federer didn't even have this much at this age

[AlphaDraconis7]

Nadal's 23 in 1 month....

Tennis players peak between 22-25 yrs old....

Nadal is in his peak....

[TibxB0i]

he can peak at 25, u cant assume hes at his peak

[alywen06]

The fact that nadal body is giving up on him shows his career could be over within a year

[Zaenth]

Lets hope it wont be over in a long time

[satishsatishiyer]

I don't think within a year... but yes i a firm beleiver that Nadal will not win more than 10 slams in his career... That is just my opinion...

[newmark401]

Federer past it? He's just beaten Nadal in the Madrid final and won the French Open for the first time. I'd say he has a few titles left in him yet.

[alywen06]

Aye and nadal is about to lose his number 1 ranking and federer if he wins will claim it and repeat what rafa did last year. Nadal is burning out big time

[HodMaster]

Federer and Nadal still have a lot of tennis to play. We can decide who is better in a few years once the dust has settled.

[Jaishankar100]

@HodMaster at this point of time... i am worried that nadal may well get to 16 GS and complete a career slam this year... If anyone is to stop him...its got to be FEDERER~!!!!!

[cj397]

@Jaishankar100 i dont think nadal could beat fed at the us open, the courts just too fast for nadal's style of strokes

[Jaishankar100]

@cj397 ur right but u cant count nadal out...he's been to the semi's twice without playing his best and looking at the recent past..Soderling , Murray and Berdych have all been beaten with ease by nadal..... so whose gonna stop him??? Federer ... he surely can IFF he gets to the finals or semis ....!! And if Nadal comes to the final...i dont think anyone can stop him....Maybe not even Federer!!

[cj397]

@Jaishankar100 on a fast harcourt, fed's got the style that would dominate nadal's shots. fed almost cant be broken on the us open court. when he's serving wonderful, and also serve and volley'ing every few points, nadal would have a hard time breaking him.

and i mean the us open court only, because it's the fastest court on the tour.

the australian open's court is layer with sand mixed in on the top, slowing down the ball a bit, so the 09' australian win for rafa over fed was a bit easier

[Jaishankar100]

@cj397 lets hope for the better..!!!  Go Roger!!!

[MulletMan310893]

totally agree with u. he was only just beatin fed on clay in 06. the onli bad performance from federer in 06' was against nadal in dubai wher he lost 2-6, 6-4, 6-4 on hard courts.

[aczzz01]

yet another wrong prediction XD

[Alsinator]

yeah i was after the first song, Living on Video, thx very much

[Alsinator]

Hey, what is the name of this song?

[denop]

The first song is called 'Living On Video' by Pakito

[denop]

'Freesyler' by Bomfunk MC's

[sunaya94]

!! federerz gotta win this time too or else he is no longer No.1..!!