ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
HUMAN-CHIMP DNA MYTH: The actual similarity is between 70-87% not 99.8% as commonly believed. The original research stating 99.8% similarity was based on ignoring contradicting evidence. Read the article, "Evaluating the Human-Chimp DNA Myth--New Research Data" at the Institute for Creation Research Site. The similarities are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes, rather than chance. Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY LOGIC is similar to seeing an earthquake churn-up a few well-formed rocks and concluding from this that earthquakes, if given enough time, can construct a building. Macro-evolutionists take the little things here and there produced by chance and extrapolate it into something extraordinary and then call it science. Notice, all evolutionists begin with a complete species. They don't begin their theory with partially-evolved species, with partially-evolved tissues and organs.
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. For every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing extinction, not upward evolution. Most variations are from new combinations of already existing genes, not mutations.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
HOW DOES DNA MAKE A BODY? When you divide a cake the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
HUMAN EMBRYO doesn't have true gills or tail. These and other arguments have long been discarded by most evolutionists and not supported by any modern embryologist. Then, what are these structures? Read "Does The Human Embryo Go Through Animal Stages" at the Institute for Creation Research site. Briefly, what look like gills are early formation of facial and throat regions. What looks like a tail is the coccyx which grows faster than the rest of the body. The coccyx supports the pelvic muscles.
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
LOL, all you moaning in the comments, need to listean to the above video again....you need to do a VIDEO questions !! did you catch that VIDEO!!!! VIDEO, VIDEO, VIDEO!!!!
So are you ever going to answer any of the questions? Even the benign ones? My question was very benign. I just want you to explain how the commandment about making graven images is relevant in today's world. Can you post some kind of update? What is going on with this?
Hey Tony and Chat, it has become very obvious from your lack of follow- up on this issue, that your faith is a joke and an embarrassment to the collective intellect of the human race.
And you wonder why we laugh at you.
Please keep this video up as a testament to your ignorance.
Any videos containing blasphemy won't be considered? Well basically anything that goes against their dogma could be considered blasphemy, so who the shit is this targeted at? other believers?
Please go away Christians, you make my head hurt with your nonsense.
It's the typical evangelical trickery designed to bolster their crowd's faith, but not to engage anyone in a discourse, or to answer anyone's questions.
These guys are going to hand pick the easiest questions that they can answer with their bible. Their crowd will love it, feel vindicated and they'll call it a day.
I sense another embarrassing rag dolling of Theists to ensue. I don't suppose this will remain an open forum for long... we all know how poorly theist channels stand up to the overpowering hammer blows of reasoned public scrutiny of their faith. Religious folk get ready for the emotional roller coaster of having your beliefs ripped away with naked critical thought. Atheists get ready for a lot of frustrated refuting of tired dead old, bad arguments. Contenders to your corners.... ding ding!
Wow, you just had to use that image. You're doing a swell job of proving that you know as little about the opposing viewpoint as your silly friend Ray Comfort.
Theists that have a creation story are the people that believe there was nothing and then a god created the universe with magic.
@lambchopxoxo A joke is a question, short story, or depiction of a situation made with the intent of being humorous. To achieve this end, jokes may employ irony, sarcasm, word play and other devices.
i read a comment from tony on another vid that they will be taking primarily evangelism questions and *may* address others on occasion. i think they know that the questions would likely cause their viewers some doubt, and rightly so.
I don't have the option for a video post. However; I do have a question on evangelism and Muslims. After giving them the gospel (Law & Grace) they inevitably return to "the Bible has been corrupted" as their reasons why they don't agree. I have lovingly showed how Allah doesn't provide a means to remove sin, so allows sinners into paradise which is corrupt. I've simply gone back to Law & Grace or explained 25000+ transcripts from b4 Muhammad show the Bible is the still the same. Suggestions?
@nishbrown You atheists sure are an impatient lot--especially considering we have yet to publicly launch the show. We're doing test show right now and we are answering questions off of the video responses we've received. The problem: most of the questions just aren't very good. Many of them are just rife with logical fallacies, assumptions, etc.
@TheLawman104 Not impatient, we just generally know how it goes. You don't like something, you ignore it. Just look at the bible. Plenty to not like in there, all rationalized away. Its a convenient out for Christians, and built into your theology.
@TheLawman104 Oh and they probably arent assumptions but rather a simple reading of what the text says and taking it for what it means as opposed to twisting and turning to craft an "interpretation" that makes God look good.
@TheLawman104 Impatient?? It has been a month of Sundays. Literally!
Just noticed the 01/05/11 date is that it? You certainly should have your hands full. I don't understand the complaint about questions not being good enough? _Patiently Waiting
@TheLawman104 Are you trying to say that GreaBigBore's 55 questions (which are basically all that have been submitted) are riddled with logical fallacies?
Attn Video Responders: The only videos we will consider airing on the show will be videos in which we can see people's real faces and hear their real voices. Sorry, we won't show anyone who hides their identity.
@TheLawman104 The silence is Deafening. The FREE material has already been given to do a number of shows. This is something that needs to be done. All that can be done is complain about seeing someones face? It's not part of the requirement as described. I thought questions were vocal anyway! So far living water is hiding it's face . . . . and voice. GreatBigBore alone deserves an entire season. Our prayers go unanswered!
Soooo. . . . Any questions getting answered? Are you guys hiding in that box?? I have seen more questions than tony can shake a stick at. Good, strong, well thought out questions! Hello. . . . McFly? . . . . are you in there?
I guess we can just take it on faith, they will one day answer. LOL Try not to use the word refute too often, it has little meaning anymore.
ha, they removed all the muddmonkey videos, which is understandable because none of them asked any discernible questions, but they did expose the fraud of wotm rather well
@momotigomo they removed their videos because they are to chicken shit to face the truth its really sad. Trying to contact them to see if they know whats going on.
@GreatBigBore every single one of your questions are answered by thousands of articles all over the internet. You are merely regurgitating them over and over and over and over again because you refuse to actually listen. In other words you are boring! literally, because your questions and objections are already answered many times over. Even if they did answer every single question you pose, you would still not listen but get into an endless debate, because you refuse to listen.
@Dokimazo1 You are wrong here. His questions are not answered at all. If you heard a voice in your head telling you to tie up and kill your son and you told people that you were sure it was god's voice, you would be put away in a padded room and heavily medicated. You can't see through the BS in your beliefs simply beacuse you WANT them to be true and so you seek affirmation instead of critical thinking.
@savageecho You didn't read my comment did you. I said most if not of bore's questions are answered ALL OVER THE INTERNET, if he would simply go look, he'll find them all explained in detail. But the reason he doesn't is not because he's looking for answers, but rather that he's merely a spokesman for gripes and crybabies who don't know how to read for themselves but must have everything spoon fed to them by other atheists who fit their own agenda. That is not free thinking at all.
@Dokimazo1 I read your question. No there are BS RESPONSES all over the internet, not ANSWERS. You are not being honest now are you? I bet you don't know that god is as strong as a unicorn (as it says in your bible). Unicorn, however will not show in your concordance, the only way to know is to READ. It is likely that you, as well as all the other religitards, dont know the bible. You are spoon fed religion at church. The Pew research shows atheists know more about religion than the religious.
@savageecho There's no way in just a few short hours that you've gone all over the internet and debunked every single response to new atheism's bogus objections. The Pew research? It wasn't even entirely about the Bible, but more about world religions. Only 2 questions in it referred to the Bible. I went through the test, it was simply easy and I got every one of them correct. The research was not given to Christians who actually knew their Bible but to anyone on the street. It's hollow.
@Dokimazo1 This statement just shows your ignorance. And you point at others and tell them that they are not well read. Do you even know how studies arr conducts? Do you understand statistics at all? I know you will say you do, but it is obvious to anyone who has taken a stats class that you do not understand it. You are looking for selection bias to skew the results in your favor. Have you EVER stopped to think, with all the religions out there, that maybe YOU are wrong?
@savageecho the answer is, no. And yes I have taken statistics. And yes I know how studies are conducted. And thank you for proving my point that you don't bother to study, but rather let others dictate to you you want to hear.
@Dokimazo1 If you know how statistics work then why would you say, "The research was not given to Christians who actually knew their Bible but to anyone on the street." (a) this is not what they did and (b) they are representative samples. I'm sure some religious people know more than the average (hello bell shaped curve). Yes it was on multiple religions. Its funny how the more educated one is on a variety of religions the less they are likely to believe any particular one.
@Dokimazo1 Of course you have not thought that you may be wrong. You are you, and being you is very special. You are above being wrong. However, no one else can be right all the time like you, because they are not you. WRONG. Everyone is capable of being wrong and YOU do not have any more claim to correctness of belief than a muslim, hindu, shinto, etc. You think you are right because people tell you that you are. Same goes for the other groups. If you are right PROVE it with ACTUAL evidence.
@savageecho Do I look or sound like I care? Seriously, what you have as supposed proofs of your own arguments or as evidence based on the glories of your beloved scientific theory of evolution is complete and utter nonsense, half truths and lies. Arguing with you is like talking to a corpse, corpses don't think or reason they just are dead things.
@Dokimazo1 Judging by your responses, yes you do care. All you do is yell about your position and don't bother to think outside of it. Had you been born in Saudi, you would be a muslim and scream just as loud about it. You say evolution is non-sense, what of a magic man in the sky making things just for entertainment? If you don't want people to make fun of your beliefs, don't have such funny beliefs.
@ACelestialTeapotist Its not orginally mine, not sure who said it. Check out @MoreProzacPlease's Funny Atheist Quotes video. He's got some good ones there.
"Religion has no place in schools just like facts have no place in religion."
@Dokimazo1 Evolutionary theory is nonses, half-truth and lies? Odd that every objective datum and peice of evidence collected supports it, then. I think these words do not mean what you think they mean. Nonsense, half-truth and lies are the crap spewed by Comfort and his ilk to try and guilt or trick people into accepting a ridiculous premise which has no basis in anything resembling logic; and using guilt, fear and trickery are the only tools they have, as logic does not support their stance.
@savageecho First off, Abraham didn't hear a voice in his head, God spoke to him audibly. So right off the bat, you don't know what you are talking about. And why should anyone believe atheists who don't even know how to read the Bible? The answer is, they shouldn't. No one takes atheists seriously as good students or scholars of the Bible. The only people who do, are other atheists who don't study for themselves. If there's anyone who is blind, it is you.
@Dokimazo1 Were you there? No? How do you know he heard anything and didn't just make it all up? I bet you think muhammed was wrong but he heard a voice too. Why do the bilical characters need so much proof of god that they get to see miracles and hear voices but god can't be bothered to give the same to people now? Correction, YOU don't take atheists seriously, at least ot directly, but you revel in sciences' fruits which is a product of people who chose not to take the bible's word as truth.
@Dokimazo1 Thanks very much for your thoughts on my character. I'm sure that Jesus has given you magical powers to see into my soul, so you must be right. You represent your god very well. It must be proud of you.
@GreatBigBore Typical atheist diatribe. I've heard it a million times before, yawn!, you are really boring. Don't you have anything better to do with your life?
@Dokimazo1 Most of us recognize what Ray Comfort realy is, an idiot. I am all for reading material that doesn't agree with my views but Comfort is like romance novels, fiction and trash. To take a line form Billy Madison, "[Ray's statements] are the most idiotic thing I have ever heard. We are all dumber for having listened. I award [Ray Comfort] no points and may [The Flying Spaghetti Monster] have mercy on his soul."
@savageecho I didn't realize that a majority of a minority was a majority of the population of the planet. Just because a majority of a very puny minority of atheists think Ray Comfort is an idiot doesn't do much to change anything. A majority of an overall minority is still a minority. The majority of people on the planet are religious. The minority are non religious and only a very small minority of those are atheist.
@Dokimazo1 Since I never used the word "majority," your rebuttal is worthless.Atheists may be the minority in totoal world population but it is the non-believers who do the thinking and progress for the world. christianity tells us to stone our kids if they misbehave...Science, comprised mostly of atheists, agnostics and loose deists, put men on the moon, build space stations, give us power etc. xianity's cure for leprosy, sacrifice birds. Science gives us vaccines and antibiotics. Yup, pathetic
@savageecho You certainly haven't done your homework. Johannes Kepler=Lutheran;Werner Heisenberg(quantum theory)=Lutheran;Galileo Galilei=Catholic;Louis Pasteur (Vaccine)=Catholic;Albert Einstein=Jewish;Nicolaus Copernicus=Catholic;James Clerk Maxwell (electromagnetic fields)=Presbyterian;Max Planck=Protestant;Leonard Euler=Protestant;Arthur Eddington=Quaker;The Wright Brothers=Brethren - So yes, your list is indeed pathetic because it's not even true, and I've only given a tiny snippet. More?
@savageecho Rene Descartes(scientific theory)=Catholic; Isaac Newton=Anglican; Robert Boyle=Anglican;Michael Faraday=Sandemanians;William Thomson Kelvin=Anglican;Sir Francis Bacon=Anglican. All these men believed in God, they endeavored in their expertise in science BECAUSE of their belief in God. You can find many quotes from these men about their love of God and studying God's creation. Atheist scientists are a tiny number compared to the religious scientists. Moon=Buzz Aldrin=Christian.
@Dokimazo1 You again show your lack of reading. Einstein was a deist at best and rejected a personal god. If you want to compare lists then you have missed the point. First, you equate being of a family or church to some measure of religiosity. This is not true, many atheits came out of the curch. The fact is that if we take the bible as a guide then we think slavery, stoning children, incest and rape are permissible while medicine consists of blood sacrifice. Religion retards learning.
@savageecho I never ever said Einstein was a Christian. I already know he was a deist. But he was also Jewish. Atheists coming out of a church is irrelevant. You are grasping straws as well as making a huge strawman. Quite impressive strawman, I might add. And it's rather funny that you've evaded the list of Christians who were very influential in Science. Nice try, thanks for playing, better luck next time.
@Dokimazo1 If you did not say he was xian, why list him? I'm making a straw man, you are trying to inflate your position of scientits who 'believe' by using any name you can throw. You have missed my point and in doing so made it impossible for me to strawman you. You list some famous people, I'm taking about people today and in recent history that continue to contribute and who are not so famous yet still make contributions. The point: religion gets us nowhere and gives false answers.
The point is not that Newton and the other Christian scientists were Christian, the point is that they did good science. Newton, for instance, was deeply religious, although highly unorthodox, and he wrote a great deal on religious topics, more than he did on science, To Newton this was more important than his science. But he kept his theology out of his science and his science is valued and he is honoured for it.
Newton's theology is ignored and worthless, except as a curiousity.
"the curiosity is that he accepted both science and religion"
No, not really.
Remember that Newton regarded his discoveries as evidence that there was an omnipotent 'designer' God, and that the laws of nature that he discovered were evidence of that God's clockwork.
Also all of the discoveries that religion finds so threatening, deep time, deep space, the non-literal Genesis and so on, were yet to be made in Newton's time.
Seem like two nice guys...two nice guys spreading the lie of the mythical sky-fairy. Sad that people fall for this BS.
I have a question for you...Where is your proof of a god....ANY GOD??? Don't give me that "Painter/painting" BS...It's a logical fallacy. You cannot apply the same logic because NO ONE HAS EVER SEEN A GOD OR A GOD CREATE ANYTHING.
this drek just gives me the willies... flagrant ignorance and superstition pushed into the empty minds of the credulous and emotionally needy and immature. shame
@216trixie Well first off, God nowhere orders rape and kidnapping, this is a lie told by many a person who is against the Bible, thinking that the entire Bible is just nothing but "thou shall or thou shall not". What you are referring to is God prophesying that nations will come and attack Israel. God never says that rape or kidnapping are acceptable behavior. You are twisting scripture or letting people who are doing so tell you without first investigating the subject in depth yourself.
@Dokimazo1 Either you don't know your Bible or your lying. God never says that rape or kidnapping are acceptable?? He ordered them. 2 Samuel 12:11. As punishment to David, Jehovah "has David's wives taken from him, given to his neighbor, for his neighbor to have sex with them in public. Rape, and kidnapping. ..............Have you read the Old Testament. God ordered genocide, the rape of 35,000 virgins by soldiers and priests, and accepts Jephthah' human sacrifice of his daughter. Read it.
@216trixie Oh yes, the consequence of sin is horrifying. What you don't understand is that God allows evil to happen because he has already cursed the world because of sin. Obviously David didn't consider what God was doing was evil, yet you do. He, even though he greatly sinned, understood his sin and knew that he grieved God and accepted the consequences of what happened. He was still a man after God's heart - unlike you, he understood the depravity of his sin.
@216trixie God only uses the things that are already evil to take their full course and he lifted his protection off of David. That is what he is saying here. It is clear you don't know your Bible.
@Dokimazo1 You are sick, and a liar. The passage says your god gave David's INNOCENT wives to be raped and kiknapped. They were innocent. If you can't see the sickness here, there's not much hope for you. "I don't know the Bible"??? Probably better than you. Bible major at Biola University, years as a youth pastor, worship leader and street evangelist. Yeah, I think i know the Bibble.
GreatBigBore presented legitimate questions. Let's just hope they don't quote from the bible to answer them. typical Ray Comfot if they do. The way of the bstrd.
I don't know what blasphemy is. How can an atheist ask a question about apologetics without including blasphemy? Can somebody provide me with a definition of blasphemy and an example of what would not be included? I'm just confused, I'm not trying to troll.
How can you possibly ban blasphemy at the same time you challenge people to question your religion? Many people consider any questioning of the revealed word of god (whatever they have decided that might be) to be blasphemy. I'm guessing that you mean blasphemy to mean something else, or that you want questions that don't actually challenge your beliefs in any way?
The Jews believe the Temple Mount in Jerusalem is the most sacred place in creation. The Moslems believe it is the location of their worldwide kingdom. Does this reality then set the stage for end times Bible prophecy to be fulfilled?
@spiritslain Good point. This is why religion is so dangerous. Religious freaks of all stripes are trying to start World War III. Damned superstitious idiots.
Over 200 episodes and still going strong for the lord! Praise Him!
aardvark1956 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 4 months ago
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
HUMAN-CHIMP DNA MYTH: The actual similarity is between 70-87% not 99.8% as commonly believed. The original research stating 99.8% similarity was based on ignoring contradicting evidence. Read the article, "Evaluating the Human-Chimp DNA Myth--New Research Data" at the Institute for Creation Research Site. The similarities are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes, rather than chance. Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY LOGIC is similar to seeing an earthquake churn-up a few well-formed rocks and concluding from this that earthquakes, if given enough time, can construct a building. Macro-evolutionists take the little things here and there produced by chance and extrapolate it into something extraordinary and then call it science. Notice, all evolutionists begin with a complete species. They don't begin their theory with partially-evolved species, with partially-evolved tissues and organs.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. For every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing extinction, not upward evolution. Most variations are from new combinations of already existing genes, not mutations.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 4 months ago
HOW DOES DNA MAKE A BODY? When you divide a cake the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HUMAN EMBRYO doesn't have true gills or tail. These and other arguments have long been discarded by most evolutionists and not supported by any modern embryologist. Then, what are these structures? Read "Does The Human Embryo Go Through Animal Stages" at the Institute for Creation Research site. Briefly, what look like gills are early formation of facial and throat regions. What looks like a tail is the coccyx which grows faster than the rest of the body. The coccyx supports the pelvic muscles.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
At 1:02: the blood spatters explain so much...
avdmeers 5 months ago
So when the hell is this thing going to happen?
geeca85 9 months ago
LOL, all you moaning in the comments, need to listean to the above video again....you need to do a VIDEO questions !! did you catch that VIDEO!!!! VIDEO, VIDEO, VIDEO!!!!
TheNessyT 10 months ago
Seriously, did you really think these guys had any answers?
AakeTraak 10 months ago 3
I have a question about the bible.
Can you explain why god is so mad in Numbers 31 ? He sure had it in for those Midianites.
bonnie43uk 10 months ago
Soo... about answering those questions...it is never going to happen is it? You are shameful creatures.
NoRegret0 11 months ago
So are you ever going to answer any of the questions? Even the benign ones? My question was very benign. I just want you to explain how the commandment about making graven images is relevant in today's world. Can you post some kind of update? What is going on with this?
CMO999 1 year ago 3
Hey Tony and Chat, it has become very obvious from your lack of follow- up on this issue, that your faith is a joke and an embarrassment to the collective intellect of the human race.
And you wonder why we laugh at you.
Please keep this video up as a testament to your ignorance.
itsasin1969 1 year ago 18
Any videos containing blasphemy won't be considered? Well basically anything that goes against their dogma could be considered blasphemy, so who the shit is this targeted at? other believers?
Please go away Christians, you make my head hurt with your nonsense.
superwowie111 1 year ago 9
Looks like Tony and Chad are in over their head. Stick to street preaching guys, honest dialogue ain't your thing.
Sparkythedog2008 1 year ago 20
This is a sham.
It's the typical evangelical trickery designed to bolster their crowd's faith, but not to engage anyone in a discourse, or to answer anyone's questions.
These guys are going to hand pick the easiest questions that they can answer with their bible. Their crowd will love it, feel vindicated and they'll call it a day.
The end.
mku17ra 1 year ago 21
I sense another embarrassing rag dolling of Theists to ensue. I don't suppose this will remain an open forum for long... we all know how poorly theist channels stand up to the overpowering hammer blows of reasoned public scrutiny of their faith. Religious folk get ready for the emotional roller coaster of having your beliefs ripped away with naked critical thought. Atheists get ready for a lot of frustrated refuting of tired dead old, bad arguments. Contenders to your corners.... ding ding!
elbowbiter1 1 year ago 2
"Atheist
Someone that believes nothing made everything."
Wow, you just had to use that image. You're doing a swell job of proving that you know as little about the opposing viewpoint as your silly friend Ray Comfort.
Theists that have a creation story are the people that believe there was nothing and then a god created the universe with magic.
alfyakuza 1 year ago
Didn't you guys watch the video? Any video containing blasphemy will not be used; questioning faith is blasphemy.
kittyfluffins 1 year ago
@kittyfluffins I ROFL and spilled my glass of holy water on a mouse. Now there is going to be rats in heaven. chewing holes in all the clouds.
pumpstations 1 year ago
@kittyfluffins questioning faith is blasphemy? scripture reference including context and explanation please
lambchopxoxo 1 year ago
@lambchopxoxo JOAK
kittyfluffins 1 year ago
@kittyfluffins huh?
lambchopxoxo 1 year ago
@lambchopxoxo A joke is a question, short story, or depiction of a situation made with the intent of being humorous. To achieve this end, jokes may employ irony, sarcasm, word play and other devices.
kittyfluffins 1 year ago
@kittyfluffins you dont have to be a jerk about it. i didnt realize that you meant it to be a joke, consequently i also didnt think it was funny.
lambchopxoxo 1 year ago
@lambchopxoxo I apologize.
Anyway, can't wait until this program premiers on Wednesday, January 5, 2011.
kittyfluffins 1 year ago
@kittyfluffins
Qualifying one's personal faith, for ground rules in a discussion, is not how it's done.
nishbrown 1 year ago
I demand answers to GreatBigBore/Snore's questions! NAO!
Haradin32 1 year ago 5
GreatBigBore (now has video questions as GreatBigSnore) has a recent video on his channel that shows his face and proves his voice is not fake.
You now have no excuse, though you might make one, as dishonest evangelists usually do.
Aresftfun 1 year ago 7
$5 says they only pick the stupid easy questions.
Venaloid 1 year ago 4
Please explain how a question is any less valid if someones face or real voice is not used?
lordtalon69 1 year ago 4
bite me
mrx0066600 1 year ago
"we'll looking for questions."
But in the fine print it says ("that you ask while showing your face and using your real voice") lol.
socrstreets 1 year ago
When are you going to stop lying? ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS!
4G3NTanon 1 year ago
is anyone else capable of asking their own questions?
momotigomo 1 year ago
i read a comment from tony on another vid that they will be taking primarily evangelism questions and *may* address others on occasion. i think they know that the questions would likely cause their viewers some doubt, and rightly so.
lambchopxoxo 1 year ago
Evangelicals standing on a box? What a novel idea! Maybe next they can read aloud from an ancient book.
pyrite13 1 year ago
Tony & Chad: I must say it's pretty lame (and obvious) that you eliminated GreatBigBore's superb questions by changing the rules.
zebruh 1 year ago 2
Hey Tony & Chad. When are you going to answer some questions?
zebruh 1 year ago
I don't have the option for a video post. However; I do have a question on evangelism and Muslims. After giving them the gospel (Law & Grace) they inevitably return to "the Bible has been corrupted" as their reasons why they don't agree. I have lovingly showed how Allah doesn't provide a means to remove sin, so allows sinners into paradise which is corrupt. I've simply gone back to Law & Grace or explained 25000+ transcripts from b4 Muhammad show the Bible is the still the same. Suggestions?
Hebrews927 1 year ago
So far, with no answers, your failing.
Do you really think you can answer any of these questions in an honest manner?
Do you have any intention whatsoever of answering any of them?
What a shame.
Answer, or GET OFF THE BOX!!
nishbrown 1 year ago 66
@nishbrown You atheists sure are an impatient lot--especially considering we have yet to publicly launch the show. We're doing test show right now and we are answering questions off of the video responses we've received. The problem: most of the questions just aren't very good. Many of them are just rife with logical fallacies, assumptions, etc.
TheLawman104 1 year ago
@TheLawman104 Not impatient, we just generally know how it goes. You don't like something, you ignore it. Just look at the bible. Plenty to not like in there, all rationalized away. Its a convenient out for Christians, and built into your theology.
lambchopxoxo 1 year ago
@TheLawman104 Oh and they probably arent assumptions but rather a simple reading of what the text says and taking it for what it means as opposed to twisting and turning to craft an "interpretation" that makes God look good.
lambchopxoxo 1 year ago 2
@TheLawman104
If these questions are ignored, then this video can be legitimately flagged.
This video has misleading text and/or fraudulent intentions.
I will not flag it, though.
in it for the money, so concentrate on the production value and ignore the real issues.
Sad to think that people are so afraid of fairy tales that they can't even be honest about their faith.
What a shame.
nishbrown 1 year ago 9
@TheLawman104 Impatient?? It has been a month of Sundays. Literally!
Just noticed the 01/05/11 date is that it? You certainly should have your hands full. I don't understand the complaint about questions not being good enough? _Patiently Waiting
pumpstations 1 year ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheLawman104
[Quote] Many of them are just rife with logical fallacies, assumptions, etc. [End]
Then answer the question in showing the logical error!
BadScienceForFools 1 year ago 2
@TheLawman104 Are you trying to say that GreaBigBore's 55 questions (which are basically all that have been submitted) are riddled with logical fallacies?
geeca85 1 year ago 6
Wow, it is great to see you guys have gone queer positive.
happyjesus123 1 year ago
My video response was over 60 seconds. I have refilmed it and reposted it to conform with the rules :)
thirtysilver 1 year ago
Attn Video Responders: The only videos we will consider airing on the show will be videos in which we can see people's real faces and hear their real voices. Sorry, we won't show anyone who hides their identity.
TheLawman104 1 year ago
@TheLawman104 Well can you respond to some of great big bore's videos with comments? Some of them really deserve answers.
Basicpiviot 1 year ago 69
@Basicpiviot THANK YOU!
Aresftfun 1 year ago
@TheLawman104 The silence is Deafening. The FREE material has already been given to do a number of shows. This is something that needs to be done. All that can be done is complain about seeing someones face? It's not part of the requirement as described. I thought questions were vocal anyway! So far living water is hiding it's face . . . . and voice. GreatBigBore alone deserves an entire season. Our prayers go unanswered!
pumpstations 1 year ago 2
Soooo. . . . Any questions getting answered? Are you guys hiding in that box?? I have seen more questions than tony can shake a stick at. Good, strong, well thought out questions! Hello. . . . McFly? . . . . are you in there?
I guess we can just take it on faith, they will one day answer. LOL Try not to use the word refute too often, it has little meaning anymore.
pumpstations 1 year ago 4
how is answering the question coming along ?
chinh101 1 year ago 2
GREAT way to present the
BIG questions that will
BORE through the religious nonsense.
. . .Amen.
jdh501 1 year ago 3
ha, they removed all the muddmonkey videos, which is understandable because none of them asked any discernible questions, but they did expose the fraud of wotm rather well
momotigomo 1 year ago
@momotigomo they removed their videos because they are to chicken shit to face the truth its really sad. Trying to contact them to see if they know whats going on.
martinezkim19 1 year ago
Great big bore is booooorrrrriiinnnnng, who gives a flip about who ever greatbigbore is. Whoopdeeeedoooo. Yawn! next.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 "who gives a flip about who ever greatbigbore is"
I agree wholeheartedly. But feel free to address any of the questions, unless you find them all totally invalid.
GreatBigBore 1 year ago
@GreatBigBore every single one of your questions are answered by thousands of articles all over the internet. You are merely regurgitating them over and over and over and over again because you refuse to actually listen. In other words you are boring! literally, because your questions and objections are already answered many times over. Even if they did answer every single question you pose, you would still not listen but get into an endless debate, because you refuse to listen.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 You are wrong here. His questions are not answered at all. If you heard a voice in your head telling you to tie up and kill your son and you told people that you were sure it was god's voice, you would be put away in a padded room and heavily medicated. You can't see through the BS in your beliefs simply beacuse you WANT them to be true and so you seek affirmation instead of critical thinking.
savageecho 1 year ago
@savageecho You didn't read my comment did you. I said most if not of bore's questions are answered ALL OVER THE INTERNET, if he would simply go look, he'll find them all explained in detail. But the reason he doesn't is not because he's looking for answers, but rather that he's merely a spokesman for gripes and crybabies who don't know how to read for themselves but must have everything spoon fed to them by other atheists who fit their own agenda. That is not free thinking at all.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 I read your question. No there are BS RESPONSES all over the internet, not ANSWERS. You are not being honest now are you? I bet you don't know that god is as strong as a unicorn (as it says in your bible). Unicorn, however will not show in your concordance, the only way to know is to READ. It is likely that you, as well as all the other religitards, dont know the bible. You are spoon fed religion at church. The Pew research shows atheists know more about religion than the religious.
savageecho 1 year ago
@savageecho There's no way in just a few short hours that you've gone all over the internet and debunked every single response to new atheism's bogus objections. The Pew research? It wasn't even entirely about the Bible, but more about world religions. Only 2 questions in it referred to the Bible. I went through the test, it was simply easy and I got every one of them correct. The research was not given to Christians who actually knew their Bible but to anyone on the street. It's hollow.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 This statement just shows your ignorance. And you point at others and tell them that they are not well read. Do you even know how studies arr conducts? Do you understand statistics at all? I know you will say you do, but it is obvious to anyone who has taken a stats class that you do not understand it. You are looking for selection bias to skew the results in your favor. Have you EVER stopped to think, with all the religions out there, that maybe YOU are wrong?
savageecho 1 year ago
@savageecho the answer is, no. And yes I have taken statistics. And yes I know how studies are conducted. And thank you for proving my point that you don't bother to study, but rather let others dictate to you you want to hear.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 If you know how statistics work then why would you say, "The research was not given to Christians who actually knew their Bible but to anyone on the street." (a) this is not what they did and (b) they are representative samples. I'm sure some religious people know more than the average (hello bell shaped curve). Yes it was on multiple religions. Its funny how the more educated one is on a variety of religions the less they are likely to believe any particular one.
savageecho 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 Of course you have not thought that you may be wrong. You are you, and being you is very special. You are above being wrong. However, no one else can be right all the time like you, because they are not you. WRONG. Everyone is capable of being wrong and YOU do not have any more claim to correctness of belief than a muslim, hindu, shinto, etc. You think you are right because people tell you that you are. Same goes for the other groups. If you are right PROVE it with ACTUAL evidence.
savageecho 1 year ago
@savageecho Do I look or sound like I care? Seriously, what you have as supposed proofs of your own arguments or as evidence based on the glories of your beloved scientific theory of evolution is complete and utter nonsense, half truths and lies. Arguing with you is like talking to a corpse, corpses don't think or reason they just are dead things.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 Judging by your responses, yes you do care. All you do is yell about your position and don't bother to think outside of it. Had you been born in Saudi, you would be a muslim and scream just as loud about it. You say evolution is non-sense, what of a magic man in the sky making things just for entertainment? If you don't want people to make fun of your beliefs, don't have such funny beliefs.
savageecho 1 year ago
@savageecho "If you don't want people to make fun of your beliefs, don't have such funny beliefs" lol I will be stealing this line
ACelestialTeapotist 1 year ago
@ACelestialTeapotist Its not orginally mine, not sure who said it. Check out @MoreProzacPlease's Funny Atheist Quotes video. He's got some good ones there.
"Religion has no place in schools just like facts have no place in religion."
-Superintendent Chalmers, The Simpsons
savageecho 1 year ago
@savageecho thank you i will check it out
ACelestialTeapotist 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 Evolutionary theory is nonses, half-truth and lies? Odd that every objective datum and peice of evidence collected supports it, then. I think these words do not mean what you think they mean. Nonsense, half-truth and lies are the crap spewed by Comfort and his ilk to try and guilt or trick people into accepting a ridiculous premise which has no basis in anything resembling logic; and using guilt, fear and trickery are the only tools they have, as logic does not support their stance.
pyrespirit 1 year ago
@savageecho First off, Abraham didn't hear a voice in his head, God spoke to him audibly. So right off the bat, you don't know what you are talking about. And why should anyone believe atheists who don't even know how to read the Bible? The answer is, they shouldn't. No one takes atheists seriously as good students or scholars of the Bible. The only people who do, are other atheists who don't study for themselves. If there's anyone who is blind, it is you.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 Were you there? No? How do you know he heard anything and didn't just make it all up? I bet you think muhammed was wrong but he heard a voice too. Why do the bilical characters need so much proof of god that they get to see miracles and hear voices but god can't be bothered to give the same to people now? Correction, YOU don't take atheists seriously, at least ot directly, but you revel in sciences' fruits which is a product of people who chose not to take the bible's word as truth.
savageecho 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 Thanks very much for your thoughts on my character. I'm sure that Jesus has given you magical powers to see into my soul, so you must be right. You represent your god very well. It must be proud of you.
GreatBigBore 1 year ago
@GreatBigBore Typical atheist diatribe. I've heard it a million times before, yawn!, you are really boring. Don't you have anything better to do with your life?
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
Great. Big. Bore. If these guys don't include any of his questions, they are cowards. 33 and counting...
G0lfYankee 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@G0lfYankee "33 and counting"
Nah, 33 was the goal. I failed on two of them. I bet they'll choose those two.
GreatBigBore 1 year ago
@G0lfYankee "33 and counting"
That's all. I have more, but even people who like me are starting to get annoyed.
GreatBigBore 1 year ago
Why would any atheist/agnostic want anything signed by that liar Ray comfort?
savageecho 1 year ago
@savageecho they do and they have.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 Most of us recognize what Ray Comfort realy is, an idiot. I am all for reading material that doesn't agree with my views but Comfort is like romance novels, fiction and trash. To take a line form Billy Madison, "[Ray's statements] are the most idiotic thing I have ever heard. We are all dumber for having listened. I award [Ray Comfort] no points and may [The Flying Spaghetti Monster] have mercy on his soul."
savageecho 1 year ago
@savageecho I didn't realize that a majority of a minority was a majority of the population of the planet. Just because a majority of a very puny minority of atheists think Ray Comfort is an idiot doesn't do much to change anything. A majority of an overall minority is still a minority. The majority of people on the planet are religious. The minority are non religious and only a very small minority of those are atheist.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 Since I never used the word "majority," your rebuttal is worthless.Atheists may be the minority in totoal world population but it is the non-believers who do the thinking and progress for the world. christianity tells us to stone our kids if they misbehave...Science, comprised mostly of atheists, agnostics and loose deists, put men on the moon, build space stations, give us power etc. xianity's cure for leprosy, sacrifice birds. Science gives us vaccines and antibiotics. Yup, pathetic
savageecho 1 year ago
@savageecho You certainly haven't done your homework. Johannes Kepler=Lutheran;Werner Heisenberg(quantum theory)=Lutheran;Galileo Galilei=Catholic;Louis Pasteur (Vaccine)=Catholic;Albert Einstein=Jewish;Nicolaus Copernicus=Catholic;James Clerk Maxwell (electromagnetic fields)=Presbyterian;Max Planck=Protestant;Leonard Euler=Protestant;Arthur Eddington=Quaker;The Wright Brothers=Brethren - So yes, your list is indeed pathetic because it's not even true, and I've only given a tiny snippet. More?
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@savageecho Rene Descartes(scientific theory)=Catholic; Isaac Newton=Anglican; Robert Boyle=Anglican;Michael Faraday=Sandemanians;William Thomson Kelvin=Anglican;Sir Francis Bacon=Anglican. All these men believed in God, they endeavored in their expertise in science BECAUSE of their belief in God. You can find many quotes from these men about their love of God and studying God's creation. Atheist scientists are a tiny number compared to the religious scientists. Moon=Buzz Aldrin=Christian.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 You again show your lack of reading. Einstein was a deist at best and rejected a personal god. If you want to compare lists then you have missed the point. First, you equate being of a family or church to some measure of religiosity. This is not true, many atheits came out of the curch. The fact is that if we take the bible as a guide then we think slavery, stoning children, incest and rape are permissible while medicine consists of blood sacrifice. Religion retards learning.
savageecho 1 year ago
@savageecho I never ever said Einstein was a Christian. I already know he was a deist. But he was also Jewish. Atheists coming out of a church is irrelevant. You are grasping straws as well as making a huge strawman. Quite impressive strawman, I might add. And it's rather funny that you've evaded the list of Christians who were very influential in Science. Nice try, thanks for playing, better luck next time.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 If you did not say he was xian, why list him? I'm making a straw man, you are trying to inflate your position of scientits who 'believe' by using any name you can throw. You have missed my point and in doing so made it impossible for me to strawman you. You list some famous people, I'm taking about people today and in recent history that continue to contribute and who are not so famous yet still make contributions. The point: religion gets us nowhere and gives false answers.
savageecho 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1
The point is not that Newton and the other Christian scientists were Christian, the point is that they did good science. Newton, for instance, was deeply religious, although highly unorthodox, and he wrote a great deal on religious topics, more than he did on science, To Newton this was more important than his science. But he kept his theology out of his science and his science is valued and he is honoured for it.
Newton's theology is ignored and worthless, except as a curiousity.
bobguk 1 year ago
@bobguk
the curiosity is that he accepted both science and religion.
dragonking700 1 year ago
@dragonking700
"the curiosity is that he accepted both science and religion"
No, not really.
Remember that Newton regarded his discoveries as evidence that there was an omnipotent 'designer' God, and that the laws of nature that he discovered were evidence of that God's clockwork.
Also all of the discoveries that religion finds so threatening, deep time, deep space, the non-literal Genesis and so on, were yet to be made in Newton's time.
bobguk 1 year ago
Great.... Big... BORE!!!!
L9time 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
KEEP IT CLEAN!!!!!!!!
applefrog111 1 year ago
great
big
boar
El3ctricPenguin 1 year ago
HEY GUYS, EVERYONE!!! PAUSE THE VIDEO AT 1:08!!!
LOL LOL LOL LOL, LOOK WHAT IT SAYS IN THE BILLBOARD!
HA HA, THEISTS ARE THE BIGGEST LIARS OF ALL TIME, AND THE IRONY IS FANTASTIC!.
BabySatch1 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore!
BabySatch1 1 year ago
Seem like two nice guys...two nice guys spreading the lie of the mythical sky-fairy. Sad that people fall for this BS.
I have a question for you...Where is your proof of a god....ANY GOD??? Don't give me that "Painter/painting" BS...It's a logical fallacy. You cannot apply the same logic because NO ONE HAS EVER SEEN A GOD OR A GOD CREATE ANYTHING.
NOW, please provide proof of yours or any god.
TheWad1959 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore!
bigboy45454545 1 year ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
@bigboy45454545 GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore!
BabySatch1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bigboy45454545
no offense but
why do you pick on people that wont fight back
go mess with muslims
RayWilliamJohansen 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore!
sotoj159 1 year ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@sotoj159 GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore! GreatBigBore!
BabySatch1 1 year ago
@sotoj159
no offense but
why do you pick on people that wont fight back
go mess with muslims
RayWilliamJohansen 1 year ago
this drek just gives me the willies... flagrant ignorance and superstition pushed into the empty minds of the credulous and emotionally needy and immature. shame
Nhurm 1 year ago
Hahaha, a Ray Comfort thingee hahahahahaha. Pathetic
BabySatch1 1 year ago
Can any Christians here just tell me why it's o.k. for God to order rape and kidnapping?
216trixie 1 year ago
@216trixie Context! God is mysterious! er, something about Noah's flood!
Bretski17 1 year ago
@216trixie Well first off, God nowhere orders rape and kidnapping, this is a lie told by many a person who is against the Bible, thinking that the entire Bible is just nothing but "thou shall or thou shall not". What you are referring to is God prophesying that nations will come and attack Israel. God never says that rape or kidnapping are acceptable behavior. You are twisting scripture or letting people who are doing so tell you without first investigating the subject in depth yourself.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 Either you don't know your Bible or your lying. God never says that rape or kidnapping are acceptable?? He ordered them. 2 Samuel 12:11. As punishment to David, Jehovah "has David's wives taken from him, given to his neighbor, for his neighbor to have sex with them in public. Rape, and kidnapping. ..............Have you read the Old Testament. God ordered genocide, the rape of 35,000 virgins by soldiers and priests, and accepts Jephthah' human sacrifice of his daughter. Read it.
216trixie 1 year ago
@216trixie Oh yes, the consequence of sin is horrifying. What you don't understand is that God allows evil to happen because he has already cursed the world because of sin. Obviously David didn't consider what God was doing was evil, yet you do. He, even though he greatly sinned, understood his sin and knew that he grieved God and accepted the consequences of what happened. He was still a man after God's heart - unlike you, he understood the depravity of his sin.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@216trixie God only uses the things that are already evil to take their full course and he lifted his protection off of David. That is what he is saying here. It is clear you don't know your Bible.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
@Dokimazo1 You are sick, and a liar. The passage says your god gave David's INNOCENT wives to be raped and kiknapped. They were innocent. If you can't see the sickness here, there's not much hope for you. "I don't know the Bible"??? Probably better than you. Bible major at Biola University, years as a youth pastor, worship leader and street evangelist. Yeah, I think i know the Bibble.
216trixie 1 year ago
@216trixie Boy you are one messed up person.
Dokimazo1 1 year ago
GreatBigBore presented legitimate questions. Let's just hope they don't quote from the bible to answer them. typical Ray Comfot if they do. The way of the bstrd.
armarjaleo 1 year ago 21
im subscribing to this just to follow their fail...
also to see if they answer greatbigbore's questions
Leadman1989 1 year ago 6
It is mandatory that you respond to GreatBigBore. Otherwise you guys have zero credibility.
4G3NTanon 1 year ago 5
Is Living Waters related to Golden Showers?
comingatchu 1 year ago 8
I don't know what blasphemy is. How can an atheist ask a question about apologetics without including blasphemy? Can somebody provide me with a definition of blasphemy and an example of what would not be included? I'm just confused, I'm not trying to troll.
absb075 1 year ago 4
@absb075
Blasphemy= taking God's name in vain, i.e. OMG, JC, etc.
regnig87 1 year ago
its nice how when the bible apears there blood all over the screen
lepthymo 1 year ago
I'll bet that they won't response to GreatBigBore.
Palikka92 1 year ago 46
@Palikka92 they probably will, but it will be some bullshit answer and avoid the question...
sera7ares 1 year ago
@Palikka92 well they ought to try ONE hes cranking multiple ones every day
Rob8036 1 year ago
@Palikka92 They said no blasphemy. So right there any real questions are out.
SgtDICTION 1 year ago
How can you possibly ban blasphemy at the same time you challenge people to question your religion? Many people consider any questioning of the revealed word of god (whatever they have decided that might be) to be blasphemy. I'm guessing that you mean blasphemy to mean something else, or that you want questions that don't actually challenge your beliefs in any way?
atheistsquid 1 year ago
Internet is where superstition comes to die. Religion is poison, we have to get rid of it to advance as species.
bary1234 1 year ago 7
isnt on the box , what england does, when you lose your freedom of speech?
bloodhive 1 year ago
Would people be allowed to submit more than one video? (ie. ask more than one question?
SxcLilAussieBabe 1 year ago
@SxcLilAussieBabe It wouldn't matter considering they will only answer questions that fit their little sales-pitch.
th3w01fv2 1 year ago
Prophecy Poll
The Jews believe the Temple Mount in Jerusalem is the most sacred place in creation. The Moslems believe it is the location of their worldwide kingdom. Does this reality then set the stage for end times Bible prophecy to be fulfilled?
Yes 97.6%
Not Sure 2.4%
No 0.0%
spiritslain 1 year ago
@spiritslain How about adding another option "It's a load of crap, that's what happens when you believe in the rants of bronze-age Sheppards".
th3w01fv2 1 year ago
@spiritslain Good point. This is why religion is so dangerous. Religious freaks of all stripes are trying to start World War III. Damned superstitious idiots.
jdh501 1 year ago