WELL WELL WELL, THE US GOVERNMENT REFUSED TO ALLOW THE SOUTH TO HOLD ELECTIONS FOR FEAR THAT NORTH VIETNAMESE LEADER HO, CHI MINH WOULD WIN THE ELECTION AND THEREBY REUNIFY THE COUNTRY. AMERICA LOST 55,000 MEN FOR FEAR THAT A COMMIE WOULD WIN THE ELECTION AND THE US WOULD THUS HAVE TO CEASE CONTROLLING THE SOUTH OF INDOCHINA. 55K AMERICANS LOST THEIR LIVES FOR SELFISHNESS. NOT TO MENTION AN ANTI-DEMOCRATIC VIOLATION OF OUR OWN PRINCIPLES.
So the US refused to hold elections in South Vietnam to prevent an almost certain electoral victory by Ho Chi Minh. That's interesting. Vietnam could have been re-unified without a second Indochina war being fought with the US and South Vietnamese had elections been held in South Vietnam as agreed to in the 1954 Geneva Agreements. This shows that the US was really the author of the second Vietnam War and ultimately of her own defeat in Vietnam.
The Vietminh/Vietcong/North Vietnamese kept fighting and fighting without surrender. First the French, then the Americans and their allies, all failed to defeat the Vietminh/VC/NV. These people were unbelievably tough and brave; they won in two wars which would have broken a lesser people.
@toadster058 Actually nnot. Repression creates counterpressure and no matter how many military defeats you inflict on rebels fighting for their country's freedom, they will always continue fighting.
Vietnam and France could not have to fight this battle if France accepted the Vietminh proposal with Vietnam as part of "France Federation " but an autonomous state.
If you look at the how much influence that French had on in Hanoi and Saigon, it was really regretted for both to have fought till the bitter end.
Between the workers of Vietnam and the Viet Minh ( Vietnamese Stalinists ) lies a river of betrayal and blood. The only genuine communists in Vietnam were Tạ Thu Thâu and the International Communist League ( Anti-Stalinists ).
North Vietnam and South Vietnam were both authoritarian states, ruled not by workers or by democracy. Current day Vietnam is not socialist, it is nationalist capitalist with a few remnants of old style Ho Chi Minh thought.
Colonialism was not "demonic". In fact it gave Vietnam economic and religious prosperity. The communist use of the argument of "self-rule" was hypocrite, they simply replaced western imperialism with their own, red imperialism. At least under French rule, the Vietnamese people learned about the truth of salvation in Jesus Christ. That is what the communists aimed to destroy.
8:30 The CIA massacred whole villages of Catholics and accused the "communists" of the crimes. The said black propaganda was that communists would kill all Catholics, and further more, that Jesus and the Virgin Mary had already evacuated to the South!
I remind you, in case you don't know, that the French won their main battles in 9 years of Vietnam war, without almost any air support, except this one, Dien Bien Phu. USA dropped millions tons of bombs there, and they lost. Try to open the right hisory books, before to spread your usual craps.
On the base of the WWII Charle Orde Wingate Chindit operations, the French plan was sound by inserting a full garrison by air and support it by air supply. To suppress this air supply was to take the garrison. It's been done. Take the book of Colonel Jules Roy. At the smaller scale, the GCMA (Groupement de Commando Mixte Aeroporté) was on the same line of air inserion and supply.
Last time I checked US didn't do much better. In fact, the French at least managed to keep the whole country occupied for 50 years. The US failed to occupy half of it for 20 years. But anyway, Vietnamese are great fighters and they well deserved to prevail over both foes.
@TheSilverBrick1 Umm... actualy the Soviet Union did the better part of fucking-up the Germans in WW2... And the same state (along with the People's Republic of China) provided crucial war material that enabled the Vietnamese to endure throughout the struggle :).
@prankster1590 America originally tried to stay out of the war.USA provided weapons and ships to the british until it became apparent that they were going to lose, America stepped in. It was the british who needed help from america, russia, and canada.
The USA joined the war because they propably were the next target of hitler after the occupation of the UK. The germans were the best fighting force in history. The americans and the coalition were pretty lucky that hitler lost his marbles during the liberation. If he woul've have listened to his generals the outcome of the war could have been different.
@TheSilverBrick1 Funny that inferiority complex Americans have toward France. Always have to prove USA is better. You are comaparing a country the size of Texas...with the whole of the USA dumb ass! If you want to compare, compare with countries yuour size. Why don't you compare yourself to Monaco or Singapore...? Or vativcan city? Why Americans are such a useless bunch of idiots? Have the general knowledge of an oyster but still want to open it up big! Srew America. End of the story!
@rodolphegilles why screw america? I dont think that america is a useless bunch of idiots, we help in global conflicts around the world. And most country's base their democratic depomplicy off us.
@VersusARCH You need to check again. The United States killed 10 times as many Vietnamese than the French ever could. France also surrendered this war. The U.S. bombed the North into a peace treaty and then left the country. The United States never lost this war while the majority of their forces were in Vietnam. France got their asses handed to them. Also, they did not own the country for 50 years. France ran like cowards when Japan came into the picture. I think the U.S. did MUCH MUCH better.
@VersusARCH Hahahahahahhahah Fukin gooks didint win you noob the french are pussys how thay beat the gooks idk but tell you this much we didint lose that warr....
@VersusARCH Actually the US did not tried to occupy Vietnam idiot. Vietnam war started when North Vietnam, along with the VC invade South Vietnam to impose communism into that country and they had no right to do it. In 1964, the ARVN requested the US to send their troops into Vietnam and so the US did. The US killed five times more NVA troops than what did French tried to with the Viet-Minh. The war was lost due to politics, not cause of military.
@Hperman09 Just as this documentary states, why didn't the South Vietnamese and the US hold the elections that was promised? They feared that Ho Chi Minh was going to win those democratic elections, so they didn't hold them. The North Vietnamese had every right to invade South Vietnam.
@ilovejiyeonlee Why did North impose communism after they take over in 1973? The south vietnam goverment did have support of most of the people, that why the tet offence of 1968 failed miserably for the vietcong, because they thought the people would rise up against the goverment, instead the people back the goverment against the VC.
Colonialism is demonic, greed, power hungry monster,and like a cancer cell it must be removed. Depriving indiginous national people from their property and self rule is recipe for disaster. If your country taken over by foreigners, repelling them would be natural response. Enjoy your freedom where ever you lie. Gooday Mate
@nanssor You are right. My polarized comment was in reference to another comment or something said in documentary. These wars never fun, especially this one. Hope communism countries evolve into more capitalistic, democratic governments, China for example. (Not sure if that is good example)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Horrible!! So much lost because of the communism's expansionism - this ideaology is demonic, greedy, power hungry monster, and like a cancel cell it got to be removed from this world so it won't spread and distory the health cells.
Just remember The US & France sent a lot more of the Viets to their graves !!! C'EST BON !
SouthwestRanger 4 hours ago
WELL WELL WELL, THE US GOVERNMENT REFUSED TO ALLOW THE SOUTH TO HOLD ELECTIONS FOR FEAR THAT NORTH VIETNAMESE LEADER HO, CHI MINH WOULD WIN THE ELECTION AND THEREBY REUNIFY THE COUNTRY. AMERICA LOST 55,000 MEN FOR FEAR THAT A COMMIE WOULD WIN THE ELECTION AND THE US WOULD THUS HAVE TO CEASE CONTROLLING THE SOUTH OF INDOCHINA. 55K AMERICANS LOST THEIR LIVES FOR SELFISHNESS. NOT TO MENTION AN ANTI-DEMOCRATIC VIOLATION OF OUR OWN PRINCIPLES.
narlycat 3 months ago in playlist More videos from NoEalamInSL
So the US refused to hold elections in South Vietnam to prevent an almost certain electoral victory by Ho Chi Minh. That's interesting. Vietnam could have been re-unified without a second Indochina war being fought with the US and South Vietnamese had elections been held in South Vietnam as agreed to in the 1954 Geneva Agreements. This shows that the US was really the author of the second Vietnam War and ultimately of her own defeat in Vietnam.
toadster058 5 months ago
The Vietminh/Vietcong/North Vietnamese kept fighting and fighting without surrender. First the French, then the Americans and their allies, all failed to defeat the Vietminh/VC/NV. These people were unbelievably tough and brave; they won in two wars which would have broken a lesser people.
toadster058 5 months ago
@toadster058 Actually nnot. Repression creates counterpressure and no matter how many military defeats you inflict on rebels fighting for their country's freedom, they will always continue fighting.
A lesson repreated time and time again.
PalleRasmussen 2 months ago
Vietnam and France could not have to fight this battle if France accepted the Vietminh proposal with Vietnam as part of "France Federation " but an autonomous state.
If you look at the how much influence that French had on in Hanoi and Saigon, it was really regretted for both to have fought till the bitter end.
hoangtran26 1 year ago
Between the workers of Vietnam and the Viet Minh ( Vietnamese Stalinists ) lies a river of betrayal and blood. The only genuine communists in Vietnam were Tạ Thu Thâu and the International Communist League ( Anti-Stalinists ).
North Vietnam and South Vietnam were both authoritarian states, ruled not by workers or by democracy. Current day Vietnam is not socialist, it is nationalist capitalist with a few remnants of old style Ho Chi Minh thought.
UDSS 1 year ago
thank you for posting these
fuzztubeyou 1 year ago
thanks for the vid mate
yeuquehuong 1 year ago
Colonialism was not "demonic". In fact it gave Vietnam economic and religious prosperity. The communist use of the argument of "self-rule" was hypocrite, they simply replaced western imperialism with their own, red imperialism. At least under French rule, the Vietnamese people learned about the truth of salvation in Jesus Christ. That is what the communists aimed to destroy.
zweefvliegtuig 1 year ago
@zweefvliegtuig at shut the fuck up jesus christ tell you to kill
yeuquehuong 1 year ago
not really mate.infact,i think they pefer Christinaty over buddhasim for some reason
tinmaptd 1 year ago
8:30 The CIA massacred whole villages of Catholics and accused the "communists" of the crimes. The said black propaganda was that communists would kill all Catholics, and further more, that Jesus and the Virgin Mary had already evacuated to the South!
shillyshallyz 1 year ago
Ignorent prick " France got beat" fuck off France fought hard.
GeneralmotorsMHM 1 year ago
USA was offering to use A-bomb in Dien Bien Phu,but France did not suport.
50poiuyt 1 year ago
I remind you, in case you don't know, that the French won their main battles in 9 years of Vietnam war, without almost any air support, except this one, Dien Bien Phu. USA dropped millions tons of bombs there, and they lost. Try to open the right hisory books, before to spread your usual craps.
Camarale 2 years ago
On the base of the WWII Charle Orde Wingate Chindit operations, the French plan was sound by inserting a full garrison by air and support it by air supply. To suppress this air supply was to take the garrison. It's been done. Take the book of Colonel Jules Roy. At the smaller scale, the GCMA (Groupement de Commando Mixte Aeroporté) was on the same line of air inserion and supply.
slomoschon2000 2 years ago
Last time I checked US didn't do much better. In fact, the French at least managed to keep the whole country occupied for 50 years. The US failed to occupy half of it for 20 years. But anyway, Vietnamese are great fighters and they well deserved to prevail over both foes.
VersusARCH 2 years ago 25
@VersusARCH Yeah but french also sucked in world war 2 isnt that right, and america fucked up the germans so america is better
TheSilverBrick1 1 year ago
@TheSilverBrick1 Umm... actualy the Soviet Union did the better part of fucking-up the Germans in WW2... And the same state (along with the People's Republic of China) provided crucial war material that enabled the Vietnamese to endure throughout the struggle :).
VersusARCH 1 year ago
@TheSilverBrick1 America needed help from the britisch, the russians and the canadians in ww II. You idiot.
prankster1590 11 months ago
@prankster1590 America originally tried to stay out of the war.USA provided weapons and ships to the british until it became apparent that they were going to lose, America stepped in. It was the british who needed help from america, russia, and canada.
TheSilverBrick1 7 months ago
@TheSilverBrick1
The USA joined the war because they propably were the next target of hitler after the occupation of the UK. The germans were the best fighting force in history. The americans and the coalition were pretty lucky that hitler lost his marbles during the liberation. If he woul've have listened to his generals the outcome of the war could have been different.
prankster1590 7 months ago
@TheSilverBrick1 Funny that inferiority complex Americans have toward France. Always have to prove USA is better. You are comaparing a country the size of Texas...with the whole of the USA dumb ass! If you want to compare, compare with countries yuour size. Why don't you compare yourself to Monaco or Singapore...? Or vativcan city? Why Americans are such a useless bunch of idiots? Have the general knowledge of an oyster but still want to open it up big! Srew America. End of the story!
rodolphegilles 8 months ago
@rodolphegilles why screw america? I dont think that america is a useless bunch of idiots, we help in global conflicts around the world. And most country's base their democratic depomplicy off us.
TheSilverBrick1 7 months ago
@VersusARCH You need to check again. The United States killed 10 times as many Vietnamese than the French ever could. France also surrendered this war. The U.S. bombed the North into a peace treaty and then left the country. The United States never lost this war while the majority of their forces were in Vietnam. France got their asses handed to them. Also, they did not own the country for 50 years. France ran like cowards when Japan came into the picture. I think the U.S. did MUCH MUCH better.
Jimmycorvettefan71 1 year ago
@VersusARCH Hahahahahahhahah Fukin gooks didint win you noob the french are pussys how thay beat the gooks idk but tell you this much we didint lose that warr....
SkItSoLovesCherry 11 months ago
@VersusARCH Actually the US did not tried to occupy Vietnam idiot. Vietnam war started when North Vietnam, along with the VC invade South Vietnam to impose communism into that country and they had no right to do it. In 1964, the ARVN requested the US to send their troops into Vietnam and so the US did. The US killed five times more NVA troops than what did French tried to with the Viet-Minh. The war was lost due to politics, not cause of military.
Hperman09 7 months ago
@Hperman09 impose communism? thats a very american way to say it. without doubt communism is better for the people than corrupt imperialism.
Nekronaut321 7 months ago
@Nekronaut321 看看中國再說吧
sh920203 7 months ago
@Hperman09 VC never 'invaded' South VN.
They were a part of the South VN unit.
XShynobiX 7 months ago
@Hperman09 Opps sorry didn't read the whole thing
XShynobiX 7 months ago
@Hperman09 Just as this documentary states, why didn't the South Vietnamese and the US hold the elections that was promised? They feared that Ho Chi Minh was going to win those democratic elections, so they didn't hold them. The North Vietnamese had every right to invade South Vietnam.
ilovejiyeonlee 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ilovejiyeonlee Why did North impose communism after they take over in 1973? The south vietnam goverment did have support of most of the people, that why the tet offence of 1968 failed miserably for the vietcong, because they thought the people would rise up against the goverment, instead the people back the goverment against the VC.
Hperman09 6 months ago
ha ha french got beat
sterlingmenthol77 2 years ago
Colonialism is demonic, greed, power hungry monster,and like a cancer cell it must be removed. Depriving indiginous national people from their property and self rule is recipe for disaster. If your country taken over by foreigners, repelling them would be natural response. Enjoy your freedom where ever you lie. Gooday Mate
nergvol 2 years ago 9
@nergvol it was a civil war too, against communism!
nanssor 1 year ago
@nanssor You are right. My polarized comment was in reference to another comment or something said in documentary. These wars never fun, especially this one. Hope communism countries evolve into more capitalistic, democratic governments, China for example. (Not sure if that is good example)
nergvol 1 year ago
@nergvol That is not the case with the British Empire...
LordWellington15 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Horrible!! So much lost because of the communism's expansionism - this ideaology is demonic, greedy, power hungry monster, and like a cancel cell it got to be removed from this world so it won't spread and distory the health cells.
freedomofmymind 2 years ago