The Bible says in Genesis 1:24-31 that all land animals (so that includes dinosaurs) and people were created on the same day. The geologic record shows that the large dinosaurs died out at least 65 million years before humans showed up on the planet.
It's been 2,000 years now, and some people are still waiting for a dead guy to come back.
Figure it out. The Bible is just old myths and legends, not truth. Religion is like history class - without the facts.
@SeenAndNotSeen You're not an author, you have no creative ability. How many women use this service to make uploads of this type? (answer is contained in this question, and in my previous insults)
95% of all new science is thrown out every few years. What's been proven about purposeful evolution since you've uploaded this makes you look outdated. < Is that better?
@shizzleman8 Misogynistic middle-aged Christian man opines on "creativity" and expresses his righteous anger (the kind that makes him call things "shit" while adhering to a superstitious adversion to curse words that makes him spell it "sh*t") while making unfounded blanket-statements with zero evidentiary support except for the use of a made-up statistic so as to make him seem well-informed, all while claiming phantom evidence for intelligent design.
@SeenAndNotSeen Keep up the vocabulary training it's really paying off. Of course I'm not going to give you evidence, that's like feeding creme brulee to a hog.
If what you had was so FUCKING great, why are you sharing it with me? Why not go on Jeopardy and win BIG money if you have all the FUCKING answers? (< Better?)
@shizzleman8 Sorry about calling you middle-aged; the skullet and the fact that you say you are 48 years old really threw me. Your responses are hilarious, though. You are very skilled at using analogies to explain why you cannot back up any of your claims or insults. If there were a game show that rewarded abusive over-confidence, weaseling out of debate, or the butchering of classic rock songs, you would be the next Ken Jennings.
@SeenAndNotSeen I'm much older and younger than you believe me to be, this is because you only have one view of everything, yours. You're using a double standard in applying considerations of evidence, and qualifications as an expert to yourself, and Ben Stein, Ph.D. You have no argument to be overcome, you only have irrelevant, prejudicial, and inadmissable groundless opinions & argumentative speculations, (thanks for watching!)
@SeenAndNotSeen What's your case? What authorities, precedents can you present that validate your claim(s)? How do you get from Ben Stein Ph.D isn't an expert to his conclusions are wrong, therefore WHAT?
Jackwagon says evolution isn't random, so what exactly is it then? It's the opposite of random, purpose. He's a hostile witness to your case, fatally so.
@shizzleman8 The Expelled movie's only argument against the truth of evolution is fallacious. It uses a strawman version of evolution that says that a one-celled organism spontaneously generated, "fully-formed." Not only does the theory of evolution not attempt to address the origin of life (only its diversity; abiogenesis is the study of the origin), but scientists posit that the first cell came about through many gradual intermediate stages, not one big jump from nothing to its current form.
@SeenAndNotSeen The theory of evolution is a sound theory which has been abused by an atheist spin arguing that it shows order can emerge from random chaos. In fact it is a case of order in (the laws of nature), order out. There's another antonym for random, order.
Personally I hold to evolution being targeted, convergent, and ceasing after targets are reached. Your idea of gradual intermediate stages isn't congruent with Gould's generally accepted Punctuated Equilibrium.
@shizzleman8 Gould was referring to speciation events wherein a small fraction of a greater opoulation became isolated under particular environmental conditions, leading to a build-up of mutations-- this process would still take hundreds of thousands of years. This process, however, has nothing to do with the development of the first life, as it predates the existence of DNA as we know it. The self-replication of proteins which came to produce proto-cells is a different process from evolution.
@SeenAndNotSeen the first cell came about through many gradual intermediate stages not one big jump from nothing to its current form. < I hold to a different understanding than you here.
I said it's a sound THEORY, I just differ with you on the main point of order and purpose in and out. Scientific attempts to explain the origin of the universe are subject to limitations based in the philosophy of science and the epistemological constraints of science itself, can't ask WHY we exist.
@shizzleman8 No scientist has ever claimed that the laws of motion and the planets came about through random genetic mutation, yet Stein seems to think that this is the scientific concensus and argues vehemently against these imaginary scientists in interviews such as the one that I cut up for this video.
@SeenAndNotSeen Homer Simpson was being grilled by his new coworker "Grimey" Frank Grimes about his horrendous safety record when Lenny buts in, "People make mistakes, that's why they put erasers on the ends of pencils". It's not random IN OR OUT! In particle physics, the strong interaction is one of the four fundamental interactions of nature, the others being electromagnetism, the weak interaction and gravitation. As with the other fundamental interactions, it is a non-contact force. Effects
@shizzleman8 The Expelled movie relies on making the audience go "ooh" and "aah" over the complexity of a modern cell and use that complexity to build an argument from incredulity. In fact, those modern cells and bacteria have been the subject to the same billions of years of evolution as humans and all other life. The only time the movie tries to actually disprove evolution, it does so by attacking an idea that no scientist actually believes and then calling it "Darwinism."
@shizzleman8 Lastly, the problem with Ben Stein specifically is that he repeatedly demonstrated that he has no idea what the "Darwinism" he's attacking even means. In multiple interviews, he criticized "Darwinism" for not explaining the orbits of planets or the laws of motion. He seems to think the theory of evolution is supposed to be a theory of everything, and therefore, because non-random selection acting on random genetic mutation doesn't create planets, evolution is false.
@SeenAndNotSeen There's a difference between Darwinism, his books, and modern evolutionary biology. In Kitzmiller v. Dover, the stage was set for a "movie response" to be made by the losing party. There are common courtroom objections that could be used in everyday speech, have you ever been to court before? Attorneys aren't reprimanded for withdrawing questions (sustained objections). :-D The modern scientific method of research has MAJOR flaws, it can't answer everything! See NOMA,
Wow you editted a video and changed around everything Ben Stein said. I can identify what video you got this crap from and tell what you changed to make it appear as if he was promoting the opposite side. Ben Stein is a moron, but in a sense, this is no better than what he did with the movie Expelled. This video and his movie are propaganda.
@buttface112211 Ben Stein graduated Columbia WITH HONORS, and Yale Law School with a Doctorate in Jurisprudence and as VALEDICTORIAN. You don't even know what any of those WORDS mean.
When you refer to someone as a moron, you're just psychologically projecting.
If the odds of evolution being random weren't the staggering 4 trillion to one as shown in the movie, then Richard Dawkins wouldn't have numerous models trying to break it down. God Delusion & computer model. Both FAILED!
@shizzleman8 Ben Stein deliberately misleads and misguides people. He is arguing for a scientific hypothesis, you just listed some of his credentials, I saw nothing about science. It is intellectual dishonesty for him to sit down at an interview and make up stories negative stories about evolution as evidence for his hypothesis. ID has been ruled unscientific in court. He has a rudimentary understanding of science and the scientific method, he does not even understand evolution.
@shizzleman8 This man also thinks evolution must be wrong, because it does not include the Newton's laws of motion and gravity, Einstein's theory of special and general relativity, thermodynamics, abiogenesis, and other unrelated scientific fields. I mean moron when pertaining to science, and education, as he is clearly intent on introducing Intelligent Design, which has been proven to be Creationism, into classrooms around the country. And evolution is not random, nor an accident.
@buttface112211 A doctorate in juisprudence is considered to be the most advanced degree in a general science. It's a field of study in other words and how does being a Dr. not appear scientific? ein STEIN.
@buttface112211 The philosophy of science is concerned with the assumptions, foundations, methods and implications of science. It is also concerned with the use and merit of science and sometimes overlaps metaphysics and epistemology by exploring whether scientific results are actually a study of truth. Natural science as you're implying is the only one to use the scientific method as the only source of inquiry then NO all other fields of study incorporate it and a plethera of other methods.
@shizzleman8 Where do you get this information? If you search Jurisprudence in Google it clearly says, in every link on the first page, the science of philosophy of law. It all pertains to law, as I said earlier.
@buttface112211 The first rule of Law and Science is the same, objectivity. This isn't the human condition. How many objective people or programs are you aware of? Even the news that traditionally meant "fair reporting" is all slanted one way or another. It's about experience. One side believes that what they know is greater than another side that says either we know more or we have experience. Law is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God. < It's decided.
@shizzleman8 Okay, so then jurisprudence relates to science based on their objectivity. That does not make him scientifically literate, it is not a science degree, I don't see where you are going with this. Jurisprudence is completely irrelevent.
@buttface112211 That was really excellent right up to the last sentence.
Evidence is inadmissable if it's UNFAIRLY PREJUDICED. I work for a medical malpractice attorney, retired, she's more intelligent and knowledgeable about medicine than the Doctors she defended. The LAW rules and administers JUSTICE for ALL, including scientists, especially scientists. The law keeps the science legit.
one this is a horrible video, you ever here of auto tune.. and there is no such evidence that the big bang theory is correct your out of your mind for thinking that because no one knows how the earth was created, but the Bible explains it best.
@hcivic5 That's right! Then ask an atheist or any Scientist, what happened just milliseconds before the theory of the "BIG BANG" (when nothing existed, NOT EVEN SPACE!), Or in other words, what exactly then, caused matter to appear out of NOWHERE! or how did the first living complex cell make itself out of "IN-ORGANIC" matter? You'll Stump Them Every time! ALL BY THE GREAT AND POWERFUL "CHANCE" is what you'll most likely hear, or MOCKING FOUL LANGUAGE IN ANGER! (children of Satan).
Ben Stien believes in God, This dude that made this video has no life mixing up bens words like that but....your a sinner and you need God to fix you why cant anyone except that-man up!
I saw Ben Stein in an idols like tv show of models not too long ago. He was there as a "professor" to test the smarts of the candidates with a variety of intelligence tests. It is the ultimate irony, the biggest idiot in the universe is considered to be a wise man for models.
If you stop the video at 0:53 or 0:54 when ben stein is being haircutted, his face is much longer than his forehead skull. There is much more meat into his mouth than there is brain inside the skull. Can you see the proportion difference there?
His face is stretched downwards. With people like Christopher Hitchens its the opposite, there is a big skull and a relatively short face structure.
I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church.
All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit."
Tagging this as "Comedy" begs the question: What makes this funny? And please, don't just reply "If you don't get it, you don't know what's funny" Is it wordplay, is it shocking or surprising, is it humorous incongruity, is it nonsense presented sensically? I just don't see what would get a laugh from this.
@trublgrl It's Ben Stein's words chopped up, taken out of context, and reorganized to create a new rant. He made a movie supporting "Intelligent Design", and now, in this video, thanks to editing, he criticizes ID and religion.
@SeenAndNotSeen - So you think this is some kind of a real "Ho Ho" - I think NOT - it's just stupid, in poor taste and totally not worth the time and trouble you took to do it. Good God, go find something constructive to do with your time and talent - this surely is not it!
@GJacksonT I am going to lose sleep tonight wondering if I wasted two hours of my time, two and a half years ago, because one person doesn't find this video funny.
@SeenAndNotSeen - It should be no surprise to anyone that “sarcasm” is your only defense. The fact that you maligned a legitimate attempt to expose the lies and deceit of the so-called “scientific community” concerning its bias against any explanation of our existence except “evolution” and to cut, paste and edit a total misrepresentation to mock and deny God exists is reprehensible. There is NOTHING funny about it.
@GJacksonT Sarcasm is a perfectly acceptable response to comments such as yours which lack any content. In fact, it's the #2 most-fitting response possible (#1 is ignoring you entirely).
"Expelled" was a terrible movie with little to no scientific content and a weak premise about Nazis and "persecution" of ID-ers with little basis in reality. It has been addressed and thoroughly refuted in the past few years.
Lots of people find this video funny, and leaving comments only helps my video.
@SeenAndNotSeen - Yes, I read your disclaimer and comments about this being intended as "comedy" - I simply disagree - In my opinion, there is nothing "funny" about it. That said, this exchange is concluded and I will choose to exercise your option #1 - IGNORE YOU ENTIRELY!
@GJacksonT PS: My cut-and-paste doctoring of Ben Stein's speech, while clearly advertised as edited and not reality, is a parody of Expelled's own practice of chopping up interviews and taking them out of context.
@GJacksonT I couldn't have said it better, but I would add, mockery is admitting one has no argument. It is what a child starts with and a loser ends with.
@Goohuman Sorry, I didn't realize that I alone represent criticism of Ben Stein and his awful movie. See, actual scientists and journalists have ripped apart "Expelled." If you are unaware of criticism of the movie, you haven't looked hard enough. See, there's this website called "Google."
I don't see how adding a bit of mockery against an already discredited opponent in any way invalidates my position and the position of scientists.
@Goohuman Besides, a point you apparently missed is that Ben Stein's objections to evolution are laughably inappropriate. He believes that the theory of evolution should answer every single question about the universe. Since it can't account for gravity and the laws of motion, he claims it's flawed. In this video, I showed that his objections apply much more so to God, since as Creator, God *is* supposed to account for everything. It's not my fault you didn't know that comedy could have a point.
You are extrapolating. Ben was making the point that an intelligent designer would account for everything, evolution does not. If you use proper logic, you would have a point there, but instead you claimed to know what Ben believed about the theory of evolution.
Your attempt to excuse mockery as 'comedy with a point' does not ring true. It sounds like a defense or excuse.
Just make your case. I may be religious, but I will not dismiss facts. It seems you will.
@Goohuman Wrong, sir. Wrong. Ben Stein clearly stated what he believed evolution was supposed to be. In multiple interviews, including one with Pat Robertson, he complained that "Darwinism" accounted for so little: it can't account for where gravity came from, or how the planets stay in orbit, or how the laws of motion work.
"Intelligent Design" can't account for these things either, except by saying that God did it all, but without explaining how, therefore making it useless as science.
@Goohuman And I know for a fact that Ben Stein said this because, in addition to the video being available on Youtube, I used the very audio as the basis for my video!
And yes, comedy can have a point, and can often make it much more effective than simply stating it in a cut-and-dry fashion. However, it doesn't work when the person listening is oblivious to the fact that "funny" and "insightful" are not mutually exclusive. I shouldn't have to explain the joke, but for your benefit, I have.
@SeenAndNotSeen Yes, people often joke as they talk and that is fine. Mockery is insulting, but funny to those that already agree with you. I see your point there.
Your vid is not funny to me. I'm amazed you don't seem to understand that. No amount of telling me why it's funny will make it funny. I disagree with your basic assumptions.
And I will repeat, using mockery is dismissive, but if you make a logical point I will listen.
@Goohuman You don't have to think it's funny, but the fact that it is mockery does not mean it can't have a point, and even if it were mere mockery with no logical point implied, that wouldn't mean I have no legitimate reasons to disagree with Stein. It's just that other people have already made logical and scientific cases against his movie, so not a whole lot more needs to be said about it.
Really... Either you have no sense of humor. Or you are religious, meaning you have no sense. But you would, if you were religious and a part of the church, have cents. Cause you took it away from blind believers. Religion is a way for the senseless to take dollars and cents from other people with even less sense.
Really... Either you have no sense of humor. Or you are religious, meaning you have no sense. But you would, if you were religious and a part of the church, have cents. Cause you took it away from blind believers. Religion is a way for the senseless to take dollars and cents from other people with even less sense. Leaving the senseless, cent-less.
Three cheers for quote-mining! Hip hip Darwin! Hip hip Dawkins! Hip hip ancient texts written during barbaric times boasting blatantly false and outrageous hypocrisies as the only way to live a good life! Wait... that last one doesn't seem to fit... Thou shalt not kill, unless your child is a brat... yet incest, racism and slavery are morally excellent life choices?
Ironically, i used to think Ben Stein was kind of cool. He seemed to promote intelligence and was in comedy movies. Now hes a joke and hes in dumbass movies.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The non evident fact is this...This video classified as a "comedy" under the "translation" in the info box. I find nothing funny about it. Does anyone else think it is funny? Lame? Certianly. But funny? not even in a "ah ha ha **cough, cough** that's creative, Little Johnny" way
It is funny because even something as badly put together as this had a creator....a rather stupid one but nonetheless no one believes that this stupid thing just EXPLODED into being.
But that is what the moron who created this wants you to believe about your extraordinarily complicated body, earth, and Universe.
Yes let's see... Big Bang... or god made everything in seven days... hmmm....One supported by evidence.. one by a book that says someone lived in a whale.
@glassbrain Nows let me fair here, it didn't say a whale. It said a giant fish. We all know whales aren't fish. Its a book that says someone lived in a giant fish. ;)
@glassbrain Nows let be fair here, it didn't say a whale. It said a giant fish. We all know whales aren't fish. Its a book that says someone lived in a giant fish. ;)
@glassbrain Hmmm, Big bang theory, or large explosion, which would be Chaos...to...Order, Earth and even our planetary system, even perfection. Chaos to Order and perfection, by itself., Hmmm. DNA with it's written code, out of chaos, Hmmmm. Sure that will work!!
One, a child would not even believe, the other...can now be proven. Are you up to date on your chaos theory? From chaos to all of the mathematically intricate systems of life and chemistry and life sustaining balance. Hmmmmmmmmmmm
@66boeken lol what? Chaos? To order? Perfection? Please don't use such broad terms and come up with actual points if you want to discuss something, otherwise you're just another religious scientifically-illiterate blow-hard.
DNA is not a code, a code is a term simply applied to it. This is a terrible argument, please stop using it.
The big bang is a theory that is supported by evidence. The option presented by Ben is completely unsupported by any evidence thus far.
@glassbrain If you only new my field, you would not make such remarks.
when I have asked such basic questions,that even scientists are unable to answer,you know what they do?Instead of even giving a good scientific answer for all to read,they make nasty remarks such as you do.Usually they get angry a little later,but angry they will get.I would love to debate with one rule,as soon as you get angry or make nasty remarks,I stop.Yours is on one question,usually it takes longer
@glassbrain What evidence is that again? The Big Bang evidence? You and 12 others must be reading a smiliar book if it refers to the Big Bang as evidence. Here's a suggestion, get your GED, then try community college for a frew years then transfer to a university, then after graduatating all those, go to law school, graduate, pass the bar, and practice law for a few years THEN give me your opinion on what constitutes evidence as opposed to a theory. Someone says! What's your PURPOSE?
@glassbrain And other scientists once believed that the earth was flat, which means scientists are some of the most stupid fucked up assholes on the flat-ass face of this planet. Generalization's a bitch.
@glassbrain "Yes let's see... Big Bang... or god made everything in seven days... hmmm....One supported by evidence.. one by a book that says someone lived in a whale."
You're generalizing and charrypicking. We can do that too. Either way it sounds just as obsurd and childish.
@RSdaCat - I totally agree. I just realized after reading the ancient Greek "myths" that they were so right! I mean everything you need to know about the world and how it was created is right there. to think that there is no Zeus or that there was no war with him against his father and the Titans is just closing your heart to the truth. My life has change so much for the better since I realized THE Truth. I hope that everyone will soon, brother.
We should clone him. He did a great job of illustrating the lack of personal integrity and reprehensible character traits one must have to promote religion as plausible. Ben Stein seems to typify the kind of person that finds mythology appealing. Do you have a better way to induce worthless people to waste a large fraction of their lives exploring a fantasy kingdom in their own minds rather than dumb down anything of consequence with their participation? Religion may be a valuable technology.
Dude, I am speechless, this is such a thorough, thoughtful and sarcastic analysis of the material manifestation we call Ben Stein and assorted companies of fools, that I just subscribed to your channel. I respect those who can use language to "brake bones".
Quote "He did a great job of illustrating the lack of personal integrity and reprehensible character traits one must have to promote religion as plausible" that one killed me !!!!
Wow. Glad you liked it. But, as a society, we have been way too tolerant of both kinds of B.S. The mainstream religions need to be treated with the same contempt we have for Scientology or the Heaven's Gate cult. I consider it nothing more than philosophical pornography--children should definitely not be exposed to religious ideas. The irony is, if they simply embraced the idea that god is imaginary, then all religions instantly become very useful things. I try to explain this in my blog.
philosophical pornography? WOW, another good one for the billboard. This God business should be personal, strictly personal, and NOT a marketed good like sodas. But hey dude how else are you gonna rule over intelligent beings unless you infect them with a virus that turns their every fuckin advantage into a disadvantage. You and me and others discuss these fallacies but to some people it is their DAY JOB, hahahahahahaha what a world!!!!!
I think they could turn it into a genuine science--the study of how our beliefs influence the way we model reality in our minds with the goal of discovering the perspectives that are most fulfilling and personally empowering. All they have to do is accept the obvious--thats it's just an ancient mythology. In my blog I try to point out that the number i is imaginary as well. But that doesn't stop it from being remarkably good to us, and rewarding our faith in it with tremendous new abilities.
Yeah your blog is on my soon to browse list for sure, and you sure have a point. It is how a tool facilitates our journey through life, rather than how we serve the tool itself (!? humans !).
In fact I am doing my research and preparing to wright a myth-history book with a friend on exactly that relation of thoughts, myth, real events and evolution of our society. Right now people are butchering each other while they are disputing only the very thin crust on top of the Iceberg we call life.
Only the last essay is about religion. The others are mostly about what I think we should be doing as a nation. I'm trying to list every good idea I've ever had. Or at least the ones that make a lot of sense to me.
Well if more people had this hobby of collecting their sensible ideas and discussing them (which should be natural), living on this planet would be freagin splendid! But I guess everyone finds so much fulfillment in celebrity worship, war, poverty and cheap thrills that it never crossed their brand new, barely used brains. Let us all the non sadistic people, gather on an island and make a new civilization, only the word civilization does not mean too much anymore, got to come up with a new one!
I have a whole playlist of videos I've made in this style, including another with Ben Stein, Rick Warren, Kent Hovind, Ray Comfort, Kirk Cameron, and others. There's a link in the annotation to this video.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Chuckles Darwin put forth, as a lark, a hare-brained supposition that had been floating around since the days of Sumero-Akkadian culture, that unchecked evolutionary processes ruled the planet. He knew that, with the advent of superior technologies, his cartoonish take on life would fall by the wayside.
Seriously, though, there are comments all over the place from people who think the video is funny, and even from people who are offended but realize that it's not supposed to be real.
Plus, I have a whole playlist (labeled "Comedy") on my channel called "How do People Quote-Mine Creationists?" with many other videos of mine. Is that not obvious enough for you?
Last time I checked, jumping to conclusions about me based solely on a stunning misinterpretation of one video wasn't very "skeptical."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
How is this funny? You cut audio pieces and put them together to make it seem that he's pro-atheism / pro-evolution. You're right, seenandnotseen, I'm lmao... NOT.
Funny though about your name, seenandnotseen, since the Bible does state that those things which are seen are temporal (prone to change over time) and those things which are unseen are eternal. Science will NEVER explain WHY things are the way they are, it only discloses how things work, and only superficially at that.
I think I already did a good job confusing the speech of Ben Stein. As for thwarting his plans, well, the American movie-going public already did that by not seeing his movie.
The same " God" sound bite helps at least to make it easy to see the editing for people, it reminds me the time I edited Star Wars to take Jar Jar out.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Seen and not seen: What a waste of time to take Ben Stein's audio track and splice it to rearrange his spoken words. Try to do something more worthwhile with your life.
Funny, it seems like more people have seen (and liked) this video than have seen Stein's movie. I could just as easily say that it was a waste of time for Expelled's producers to trick scientists into being interviewed and launching a propaganda campaign against evolution while exploiting the Holocaust, all without providing any scientific evidence for ID. Stein makes a movie about evolution while having no idea what it even is: He thinks Charles Darwin has something to do with the Big Bang!
But apparently I struck a nerve. This video is comedic. People enjoy it. I enjoy it. I had fun making it four months ago. It was therfore very worthwhile. Of course, it's not my whole life. I've got to wonder about you, though. You seem pretty bitter, and not the least bit creative. Otherwise, you wouldn't have used the pathetic "Get a life!" ad hominem that people use when they have nothing intelligent to say. I would address your argument further, but you don't have one. Go cry somewhere else.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
hahahaha ur self
1 who ever made this used different word or sayings he said to make him say what he/she wanted and even if he did speak out about it so. he might of used 2 been an evolutionist and changed as he found out bout the real evidence.
""Science leads to killing people." is my favorite."
I find the very expression "the movie 'Big Science' doesn't want you to see!" the most laughable. It's the same "Big Science" that developed the "Clear Eyes" eye drops that Stein is a spokesman for.
Given the fact that he's made a mockery of the products name "Clear Eyes," if I were them I'd sue Stein's ass off.
Richard "Dick" Dawkins is the world's leading Darwinian Evangelist and he's been caught with his pants down committing the ultimate evolutionism no-no by admitting to Intelligent Design. It's hilarious how all Dawkins disciples are obsessed with blaming clever editing when the film was in constant motion.
The fact is that Dawkins has officially be busted for Felonious Cock Sucking while attempting to Swallow the Evidence!
Even Stein's critics agree Dawkins has forever disgraced himself!
You are obviously the same person as MsLatosi. You are both Canadian accounts, registered between Sept. 5 and 6, 2007. You have numerous other sock puppet accounts and subscribers, all while making no videos, but simply spamming.
The Bible says in Genesis 1:24-31 that all land animals (so that includes dinosaurs) and people were created on the same day. The geologic record shows that the large dinosaurs died out at least 65 million years before humans showed up on the planet.
It's been 2,000 years now, and some people are still waiting for a dead guy to come back.
Figure it out. The Bible is just old myths and legends, not truth. Religion is like history class - without the facts.
ndrthrdr1 6 months ago
author: please be honest and stop manipulating truth.
xukeith33 8 months ago
@xukeith33 Viewer: please read the description and stop wasting my time.
SeenAndNotSeen 8 months ago
@xukeith33 Really? Refering to this girl as an author is like calling the sh*t you flush fertilizer.
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 Why do you assume I am female? Or is that just your attempt at an insult?
SeenAndNotSeen 8 months ago
@SeenAndNotSeen You're not an author, you have no creative ability. How many women use this service to make uploads of this type? (answer is contained in this question, and in my previous insults)
95% of all new science is thrown out every few years. What's been proven about purposeful evolution since you've uploaded this makes you look outdated. < Is that better?
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 Misogynistic middle-aged Christian man opines on "creativity" and expresses his righteous anger (the kind that makes him call things "shit" while adhering to a superstitious adversion to curse words that makes him spell it "sh*t") while making unfounded blanket-statements with zero evidentiary support except for the use of a made-up statistic so as to make him seem well-informed, all while claiming phantom evidence for intelligent design.
SeenAndNotSeen 8 months ago
@SeenAndNotSeen Keep up the vocabulary training it's really paying off. Of course I'm not going to give you evidence, that's like feeding creme brulee to a hog.
If what you had was so FUCKING great, why are you sharing it with me? Why not go on Jeopardy and win BIG money if you have all the FUCKING answers? (< Better?)
I'm not middle aged, but thanks.
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 Sorry about calling you middle-aged; the skullet and the fact that you say you are 48 years old really threw me. Your responses are hilarious, though. You are very skilled at using analogies to explain why you cannot back up any of your claims or insults. If there were a game show that rewarded abusive over-confidence, weaseling out of debate, or the butchering of classic rock songs, you would be the next Ken Jennings.
SeenAndNotSeen 8 months ago
@SeenAndNotSeen I'm much older and younger than you believe me to be, this is because you only have one view of everything, yours. You're using a double standard in applying considerations of evidence, and qualifications as an expert to yourself, and Ben Stein, Ph.D. You have no argument to be overcome, you only have irrelevant, prejudicial, and inadmissable groundless opinions & argumentative speculations, (thanks for watching!)
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@SeenAndNotSeen What's your case? What authorities, precedents can you present that validate your claim(s)? How do you get from Ben Stein Ph.D isn't an expert to his conclusions are wrong, therefore WHAT?
Jackwagon says evolution isn't random, so what exactly is it then? It's the opposite of random, purpose. He's a hostile witness to your case, fatally so.
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 The Expelled movie's only argument against the truth of evolution is fallacious. It uses a strawman version of evolution that says that a one-celled organism spontaneously generated, "fully-formed." Not only does the theory of evolution not attempt to address the origin of life (only its diversity; abiogenesis is the study of the origin), but scientists posit that the first cell came about through many gradual intermediate stages, not one big jump from nothing to its current form.
SeenAndNotSeen 8 months ago
@SeenAndNotSeen The theory of evolution is a sound theory which has been abused by an atheist spin arguing that it shows order can emerge from random chaos. In fact it is a case of order in (the laws of nature), order out. There's another antonym for random, order.
Personally I hold to evolution being targeted, convergent, and ceasing after targets are reached. Your idea of gradual intermediate stages isn't congruent with Gould's generally accepted Punctuated Equilibrium.
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 Gould was referring to speciation events wherein a small fraction of a greater opoulation became isolated under particular environmental conditions, leading to a build-up of mutations-- this process would still take hundreds of thousands of years. This process, however, has nothing to do with the development of the first life, as it predates the existence of DNA as we know it. The self-replication of proteins which came to produce proto-cells is a different process from evolution.
SeenAndNotSeen 8 months ago
@SeenAndNotSeen the first cell came about through many gradual intermediate stages not one big jump from nothing to its current form. < I hold to a different understanding than you here.
I said it's a sound THEORY, I just differ with you on the main point of order and purpose in and out. Scientific attempts to explain the origin of the universe are subject to limitations based in the philosophy of science and the epistemological constraints of science itself, can't ask WHY we exist.
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 No scientist has ever claimed that the laws of motion and the planets came about through random genetic mutation, yet Stein seems to think that this is the scientific concensus and argues vehemently against these imaginary scientists in interviews such as the one that I cut up for this video.
SeenAndNotSeen 8 months ago
@SeenAndNotSeen Homer Simpson was being grilled by his new coworker "Grimey" Frank Grimes about his horrendous safety record when Lenny buts in, "People make mistakes, that's why they put erasers on the ends of pencils". It's not random IN OR OUT! In particle physics, the strong interaction is one of the four fundamental interactions of nature, the others being electromagnetism, the weak interaction and gravitation. As with the other fundamental interactions, it is a non-contact force. Effects
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 The Expelled movie relies on making the audience go "ooh" and "aah" over the complexity of a modern cell and use that complexity to build an argument from incredulity. In fact, those modern cells and bacteria have been the subject to the same billions of years of evolution as humans and all other life. The only time the movie tries to actually disprove evolution, it does so by attacking an idea that no scientist actually believes and then calling it "Darwinism."
SeenAndNotSeen 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 Lastly, the problem with Ben Stein specifically is that he repeatedly demonstrated that he has no idea what the "Darwinism" he's attacking even means. In multiple interviews, he criticized "Darwinism" for not explaining the orbits of planets or the laws of motion. He seems to think the theory of evolution is supposed to be a theory of everything, and therefore, because non-random selection acting on random genetic mutation doesn't create planets, evolution is false.
SeenAndNotSeen 8 months ago
@SeenAndNotSeen There's a difference between Darwinism, his books, and modern evolutionary biology. In Kitzmiller v. Dover, the stage was set for a "movie response" to be made by the losing party. There are common courtroom objections that could be used in everyday speech, have you ever been to court before? Attorneys aren't reprimanded for withdrawing questions (sustained objections). :-D The modern scientific method of research has MAJOR flaws, it can't answer everything! See NOMA,
shizzleman8 8 months ago
Wow you editted a video and changed around everything Ben Stein said. I can identify what video you got this crap from and tell what you changed to make it appear as if he was promoting the opposite side. Ben Stein is a moron, but in a sense, this is no better than what he did with the movie Expelled. This video and his movie are propaganda.
buttface112211 9 months ago
@buttface112211 Ben Stein graduated Columbia WITH HONORS, and Yale Law School with a Doctorate in Jurisprudence and as VALEDICTORIAN. You don't even know what any of those WORDS mean.
When you refer to someone as a moron, you're just psychologically projecting.
If the odds of evolution being random weren't the staggering 4 trillion to one as shown in the movie, then Richard Dawkins wouldn't have numerous models trying to break it down. God Delusion & computer model. Both FAILED!
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 Ben Stein deliberately misleads and misguides people. He is arguing for a scientific hypothesis, you just listed some of his credentials, I saw nothing about science. It is intellectual dishonesty for him to sit down at an interview and make up stories negative stories about evolution as evidence for his hypothesis. ID has been ruled unscientific in court. He has a rudimentary understanding of science and the scientific method, he does not even understand evolution.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 This man also thinks evolution must be wrong, because it does not include the Newton's laws of motion and gravity, Einstein's theory of special and general relativity, thermodynamics, abiogenesis, and other unrelated scientific fields. I mean moron when pertaining to science, and education, as he is clearly intent on introducing Intelligent Design, which has been proven to be Creationism, into classrooms around the country. And evolution is not random, nor an accident.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface112211 A doctorate in juisprudence is considered to be the most advanced degree in a general science. It's a field of study in other words and how does being a Dr. not appear scientific? ein STEIN.
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 Do you mean jurisprudence? Because that pertains to philosophy and law, not science.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface112211 The philosophy of science is concerned with the assumptions, foundations, methods and implications of science. It is also concerned with the use and merit of science and sometimes overlaps metaphysics and epistemology by exploring whether scientific results are actually a study of truth. Natural science as you're implying is the only one to use the scientific method as the only source of inquiry then NO all other fields of study incorporate it and a plethera of other methods.
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 Where do you get this information? If you search Jurisprudence in Google it clearly says, in every link on the first page, the science of philosophy of law. It all pertains to law, as I said earlier.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface112211 The first rule of Law and Science is the same, objectivity. This isn't the human condition. How many objective people or programs are you aware of? Even the news that traditionally meant "fair reporting" is all slanted one way or another. It's about experience. One side believes that what they know is greater than another side that says either we know more or we have experience. Law is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God. < It's decided.
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@shizzleman8 Okay, so then jurisprudence relates to science based on their objectivity. That does not make him scientifically literate, it is not a science degree, I don't see where you are going with this. Jurisprudence is completely irrelevent.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface112211 That was really excellent right up to the last sentence.
Evidence is inadmissable if it's UNFAIRLY PREJUDICED. I work for a medical malpractice attorney, retired, she's more intelligent and knowledgeable about medicine than the Doctors she defended. The LAW rules and administers JUSTICE for ALL, including scientists, especially scientists. The law keeps the science legit.
shizzleman8 8 months ago
i like fields, especially strawberry fields.
helpmetony 9 months ago
one this is a horrible video, you ever here of auto tune.. and there is no such evidence that the big bang theory is correct your out of your mind for thinking that because no one knows how the earth was created, but the Bible explains it best.
hcivic5 10 months ago
@hcivic5 That's right! Then ask an atheist or any Scientist, what happened just milliseconds before the theory of the "BIG BANG" (when nothing existed, NOT EVEN SPACE!), Or in other words, what exactly then, caused matter to appear out of NOWHERE! or how did the first living complex cell make itself out of "IN-ORGANIC" matter? You'll Stump Them Every time! ALL BY THE GREAT AND POWERFUL "CHANCE" is what you'll most likely hear, or MOCKING FOUL LANGUAGE IN ANGER! (children of Satan).
Acecool444 10 months ago
@hcivic5 Are you joking?
FrankieSayRelaxxx1 9 months ago
Only out of an evil satanic heart would someone go to all the trouble of stringing broken sentences into one mass ball of confusion....
GOD IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION. 1 Corinthians 14:33
Satan The Father Of All Lies! It's easy to see just why God created hell, and those who will find their way.
Ben Stein "EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED" Watch The Movie!
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (Part 1 of 10)
?v=cEvq4xIHmH4
Acecool444 10 months ago
Repent for you sins because Heaven is at stake.
hcivic5 10 months ago
Ben Stien believes in God, This dude that made this video has no life mixing up bens words like that but....your a sinner and you need God to fix you why cant anyone except that-man up!
hcivic5 10 months ago
I LOVE BEN STEIN! He'S a great man, and fights for truth! Peace.
TheWayandWordofLife 10 months ago
I saw Ben Stein in an idols like tv show of models not too long ago. He was there as a "professor" to test the smarts of the candidates with a variety of intelligence tests. It is the ultimate irony, the biggest idiot in the universe is considered to be a wise man for models.
Wushuki 10 months ago
holy shit....is it just me or did Ben's IQ increase about 90 points? now it's 91 XD
H4L0K1LL4 11 months ago
THIS IS THE WORK OF SATAN!!
jk.im.an.atheist.rofl
zysilveria47 1 year ago
If you stop the video at 0:53 or 0:54 when ben stein is being haircutted, his face is much longer than his forehead skull. There is much more meat into his mouth than there is brain inside the skull. Can you see the proportion difference there?
His face is stretched downwards. With people like Christopher Hitchens its the opposite, there is a big skull and a relatively short face structure.
Databamse 1 year ago
Huh,
I didn't think i'd ever hear Stein talk sense.
But i now understand Ben just doesn't put the words in the correct order.
Thanks for correcting that SANS :)
mindwis3 1 year ago
I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church.
All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit."
Thomas Paine
SurlytheCLown 1 year ago
Tagging this as "Comedy" begs the question: What makes this funny? And please, don't just reply "If you don't get it, you don't know what's funny" Is it wordplay, is it shocking or surprising, is it humorous incongruity, is it nonsense presented sensically? I just don't see what would get a laugh from this.
trublgrl 1 year ago
@trublgrl It's Ben Stein's words chopped up, taken out of context, and reorganized to create a new rant. He made a movie supporting "Intelligent Design", and now, in this video, thanks to editing, he criticizes ID and religion.
SeenAndNotSeen 1 year ago
@SeenAndNotSeen - So you think this is some kind of a real "Ho Ho" - I think NOT - it's just stupid, in poor taste and totally not worth the time and trouble you took to do it. Good God, go find something constructive to do with your time and talent - this surely is not it!
GJacksonT 1 year ago
@GJacksonT I am going to lose sleep tonight wondering if I wasted two hours of my time, two and a half years ago, because one person doesn't find this video funny.
SeenAndNotSeen 1 year ago
@SeenAndNotSeen - It should be no surprise to anyone that “sarcasm” is your only defense. The fact that you maligned a legitimate attempt to expose the lies and deceit of the so-called “scientific community” concerning its bias against any explanation of our existence except “evolution” and to cut, paste and edit a total misrepresentation to mock and deny God exists is reprehensible. There is NOTHING funny about it.
GJacksonT 1 year ago
@GJacksonT Sarcasm is a perfectly acceptable response to comments such as yours which lack any content. In fact, it's the #2 most-fitting response possible (#1 is ignoring you entirely).
"Expelled" was a terrible movie with little to no scientific content and a weak premise about Nazis and "persecution" of ID-ers with little basis in reality. It has been addressed and thoroughly refuted in the past few years.
Lots of people find this video funny, and leaving comments only helps my video.
SeenAndNotSeen 1 year ago
@SeenAndNotSeen - Yes, I read your disclaimer and comments about this being intended as "comedy" - I simply disagree - In my opinion, there is nothing "funny" about it. That said, this exchange is concluded and I will choose to exercise your option #1 - IGNORE YOU ENTIRELY!
GJacksonT 1 year ago
@GJacksonT Fine. I'll give you the last word.
SeenAndNotSeen 1 year ago
@SeenAndNotSeen - Good Bye!
GJacksonT 1 year ago
@GJacksonT And there you have it, the last word.
SeenAndNotSeen 1 year ago
@GJacksonT PS: My cut-and-paste doctoring of Ben Stein's speech, while clearly advertised as edited and not reality, is a parody of Expelled's own practice of chopping up interviews and taking them out of context.
SeenAndNotSeen 1 year ago
@GJacksonT I couldn't have said it better, but I would add, mockery is admitting one has no argument. It is what a child starts with and a loser ends with.
Goohuman 1 year ago
@Goohuman Sorry, I didn't realize that I alone represent criticism of Ben Stein and his awful movie. See, actual scientists and journalists have ripped apart "Expelled." If you are unaware of criticism of the movie, you haven't looked hard enough. See, there's this website called "Google."
I don't see how adding a bit of mockery against an already discredited opponent in any way invalidates my position and the position of scientists.
SeenAndNotSeen 1 year ago
@Goohuman Besides, a point you apparently missed is that Ben Stein's objections to evolution are laughably inappropriate. He believes that the theory of evolution should answer every single question about the universe. Since it can't account for gravity and the laws of motion, he claims it's flawed. In this video, I showed that his objections apply much more so to God, since as Creator, God *is* supposed to account for everything. It's not my fault you didn't know that comedy could have a point.
SeenAndNotSeen 1 year ago
@SeenAndNotSeen
You are extrapolating. Ben was making the point that an intelligent designer would account for everything, evolution does not. If you use proper logic, you would have a point there, but instead you claimed to know what Ben believed about the theory of evolution.
Your attempt to excuse mockery as 'comedy with a point' does not ring true. It sounds like a defense or excuse.
Just make your case. I may be religious, but I will not dismiss facts. It seems you will.
Goohuman 1 year ago
@Goohuman Wrong, sir. Wrong. Ben Stein clearly stated what he believed evolution was supposed to be. In multiple interviews, including one with Pat Robertson, he complained that "Darwinism" accounted for so little: it can't account for where gravity came from, or how the planets stay in orbit, or how the laws of motion work.
"Intelligent Design" can't account for these things either, except by saying that God did it all, but without explaining how, therefore making it useless as science.
SeenAndNotSeen 1 year ago
@Goohuman And I know for a fact that Ben Stein said this because, in addition to the video being available on Youtube, I used the very audio as the basis for my video!
And yes, comedy can have a point, and can often make it much more effective than simply stating it in a cut-and-dry fashion. However, it doesn't work when the person listening is oblivious to the fact that "funny" and "insightful" are not mutually exclusive. I shouldn't have to explain the joke, but for your benefit, I have.
SeenAndNotSeen 1 year ago
@SeenAndNotSeen Yes, people often joke as they talk and that is fine. Mockery is insulting, but funny to those that already agree with you. I see your point there.
Your vid is not funny to me. I'm amazed you don't seem to understand that. No amount of telling me why it's funny will make it funny. I disagree with your basic assumptions.
And I will repeat, using mockery is dismissive, but if you make a logical point I will listen.
Goohuman 1 year ago
@Goohuman You don't have to think it's funny, but the fact that it is mockery does not mean it can't have a point, and even if it were mere mockery with no logical point implied, that wouldn't mean I have no legitimate reasons to disagree with Stein. It's just that other people have already made logical and scientific cases against his movie, so not a whole lot more needs to be said about it.
SeenAndNotSeen 1 year ago
Really... Either you have no sense of humor. Or you are religious, meaning you have no sense. But you would, if you were religious and a part of the church, have cents. Cause you took it away from blind believers. Religion is a way for the senseless to take dollars and cents from other people with even less sense.
Do you understand.. Does that make sense to you..
LordBoaZ 1 year ago
Really... Either you have no sense of humor. Or you are religious, meaning you have no sense. But you would, if you were religious and a part of the church, have cents. Cause you took it away from blind believers. Religion is a way for the senseless to take dollars and cents from other people with even less sense. Leaving the senseless, cent-less.
Do you understand.. Does that make sense to you..
LordBoaZ 1 year ago
that is so dumb!!!
rockygranger 1 year ago
Three cheers for quote-mining! Hip hip Darwin! Hip hip Dawkins! Hip hip ancient texts written during barbaric times boasting blatantly false and outrageous hypocrisies as the only way to live a good life! Wait... that last one doesn't seem to fit... Thou shalt not kill, unless your child is a brat... yet incest, racism and slavery are morally excellent life choices?
ummnowwhat 1 year ago
umm this is fraud
acceptjesusorburn 1 year ago
Ironically, i used to think Ben Stein was kind of cool. He seemed to promote intelligence and was in comedy movies. Now hes a joke and hes in dumbass movies.
grendelee 1 year ago
I can't believe Ben Stein is totally bashing on God like that. That's so unlike him. Come back to us Ben, we need you!
Chasebald 1 year ago
Poor Ben, he really is a cool guy but I think he is losing it.
BARYMCOCKNER 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Anyone wearing that faggy atheist shirt is just begging to get headbutted.
TheRegulator81 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The non evident fact is this...This video classified as a "comedy" under the "translation" in the info box. I find nothing funny about it. Does anyone else think it is funny? Lame? Certianly. But funny? not even in a "ah ha ha **cough, cough** that's creative, Little Johnny" way
RSdaCat 2 years ago
Your opinion is very important to me. I am glad that you enjoyed the video enough to comment three times.
SeenAndNotSeen 2 years ago 8
Im starting to believe in evolution i see the transition now that is absent in nature, it made this video.
Acuraintegraman1 2 years ago
This is just retarded.
alessandroar2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is funny because even something as badly put together as this had a creator....a rather stupid one but nonetheless no one believes that this stupid thing just EXPLODED into being.
But that is what the moron who created this wants you to believe about your extraordinarily complicated body, earth, and Universe.
THINK PEOPLE THINK!!!!
RSdaCat 2 years ago
Yes let's see... Big Bang... or god made everything in seven days... hmmm....One supported by evidence.. one by a book that says someone lived in a whale.
glassbrain 2 years ago 14
@glassbrain Nows let me fair here, it didn't say a whale. It said a giant fish. We all know whales aren't fish. Its a book that says someone lived in a giant fish. ;)
PyroX792 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@glassbrain Nows let be fair here, it didn't say a whale. It said a giant fish. We all know whales aren't fish. Its a book that says someone lived in a giant fish. ;)
PyroX792 1 year ago
@glassbrain Hmmm, Big bang theory, or large explosion, which would be Chaos...to...Order, Earth and even our planetary system, even perfection. Chaos to Order and perfection, by itself., Hmmm. DNA with it's written code, out of chaos, Hmmmm. Sure that will work!!
One, a child would not even believe, the other...can now be proven. Are you up to date on your chaos theory? From chaos to all of the mathematically intricate systems of life and chemistry and life sustaining balance. Hmmmmmmmmmmm
66boeken 10 months ago
@66boeken lol what? Chaos? To order? Perfection? Please don't use such broad terms and come up with actual points if you want to discuss something, otherwise you're just another religious scientifically-illiterate blow-hard.
DNA is not a code, a code is a term simply applied to it. This is a terrible argument, please stop using it.
The big bang is a theory that is supported by evidence. The option presented by Ben is completely unsupported by any evidence thus far.
glassbrain 10 months ago
@glassbrain If you only new my field, you would not make such remarks.
when I have asked such basic questions,that even scientists are unable to answer,you know what they do?Instead of even giving a good scientific answer for all to read,they make nasty remarks such as you do.Usually they get angry a little later,but angry they will get.I would love to debate with one rule,as soon as you get angry or make nasty remarks,I stop.Yours is on one question,usually it takes longer
66boeken 9 months ago
@66boeken I don't need to know your field. If you don't have anything valid to say, it doesn't matter.
And the fact that you are arguing that DNA is a "written code" simply goes against you being in any sort of field relevant to the discussion at hand.
glassbrain 9 months ago
@glassbrain Yeah, but that book was written by God! Why would God lie about his own existence?! :O
BlackstarSirius 9 months ago
@glassbrain What evidence is that again? The Big Bang evidence? You and 12 others must be reading a smiliar book if it refers to the Big Bang as evidence. Here's a suggestion, get your GED, then try community college for a frew years then transfer to a university, then after graduatating all those, go to law school, graduate, pass the bar, and practice law for a few years THEN give me your opinion on what constitutes evidence as opposed to a theory. Someone says! What's your PURPOSE?
shizzleman8 8 months ago
@glassbrain And other scientists once believed that the earth was flat, which means scientists are some of the most stupid fucked up assholes on the flat-ass face of this planet. Generalization's a bitch.
tomsalam1 7 months ago
@tomsalam1 What are you babbling about?
glassbrain 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@glassbrain "Yes let's see... Big Bang... or god made everything in seven days... hmmm....One supported by evidence.. one by a book that says someone lived in a whale."
You're generalizing and charrypicking. We can do that too. Either way it sounds just as obsurd and childish.
tomsalam1 7 months ago
@tomsalam1 What a hilariously stupid thing to say.
smrt606 7 months ago
@RSdaCat - I totally agree. I just realized after reading the ancient Greek "myths" that they were so right! I mean everything you need to know about the world and how it was created is right there. to think that there is no Zeus or that there was no war with him against his father and the Titans is just closing your heart to the truth. My life has change so much for the better since I realized THE Truth. I hope that everyone will soon, brother.
Harq4LAda 2 years ago
@RSdaCat
You don't understand evolution
0HI0STATE18 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Anyone that believes this is more than a poorly jumbled together bunch of sound bytes is as moronic as the one who created it!
If you are going to attempt to make people say what they do not say you could at least do a decent job of it.
RSdaCat 2 years ago
Sombody has way too much time on thier hands.
RTyp06 2 years ago
I wish this audio track was genuine, cause then i would not have to SHOOT BEN STEIN IN THE FACE!!!!
graphattic 2 years ago 3
We should clone him. He did a great job of illustrating the lack of personal integrity and reprehensible character traits one must have to promote religion as plausible. Ben Stein seems to typify the kind of person that finds mythology appealing. Do you have a better way to induce worthless people to waste a large fraction of their lives exploring a fantasy kingdom in their own minds rather than dumb down anything of consequence with their participation? Religion may be a valuable technology.
ananiasacts 2 years ago
Dude, I am speechless, this is such a thorough, thoughtful and sarcastic analysis of the material manifestation we call Ben Stein and assorted companies of fools, that I just subscribed to your channel. I respect those who can use language to "brake bones".
Quote "He did a great job of illustrating the lack of personal integrity and reprehensible character traits one must have to promote religion as plausible" that one killed me !!!!
graphattic 2 years ago
Wow. Glad you liked it. But, as a society, we have been way too tolerant of both kinds of B.S. The mainstream religions need to be treated with the same contempt we have for Scientology or the Heaven's Gate cult. I consider it nothing more than philosophical pornography--children should definitely not be exposed to religious ideas. The irony is, if they simply embraced the idea that god is imaginary, then all religions instantly become very useful things. I try to explain this in my blog.
ananiasacts 2 years ago
philosophical pornography? WOW, another good one for the billboard. This God business should be personal, strictly personal, and NOT a marketed good like sodas. But hey dude how else are you gonna rule over intelligent beings unless you infect them with a virus that turns their every fuckin advantage into a disadvantage. You and me and others discuss these fallacies but to some people it is their DAY JOB, hahahahahahaha what a world!!!!!
graphattic 2 years ago
I think they could turn it into a genuine science--the study of how our beliefs influence the way we model reality in our minds with the goal of discovering the perspectives that are most fulfilling and personally empowering. All they have to do is accept the obvious--thats it's just an ancient mythology. In my blog I try to point out that the number i is imaginary as well. But that doesn't stop it from being remarkably good to us, and rewarding our faith in it with tremendous new abilities.
ananiasacts 2 years ago
Yeah your blog is on my soon to browse list for sure, and you sure have a point. It is how a tool facilitates our journey through life, rather than how we serve the tool itself (!? humans !).
In fact I am doing my research and preparing to wright a myth-history book with a friend on exactly that relation of thoughts, myth, real events and evolution of our society. Right now people are butchering each other while they are disputing only the very thin crust on top of the Iceberg we call life.
graphattic 2 years ago
Only the last essay is about religion. The others are mostly about what I think we should be doing as a nation. I'm trying to list every good idea I've ever had. Or at least the ones that make a lot of sense to me.
ananiasacts 2 years ago
Well if more people had this hobby of collecting their sensible ideas and discussing them (which should be natural), living on this planet would be freagin splendid! But I guess everyone finds so much fulfillment in celebrity worship, war, poverty and cheap thrills that it never crossed their brand new, barely used brains. Let us all the non sadistic people, gather on an island and make a new civilization, only the word civilization does not mean too much anymore, got to come up with a new one!
graphattic 2 years ago
Can I shoot his clone in the face though? One of the clones? one of the clowns even?
graphattic 2 years ago
hehe n1 giving 'em a taste of their own medicine
MegaLepton 2 years ago
i love this!
the supernatural explains absolutely nothing!
thegoochieguy 2 years ago
Spliced. Spliced! SPLICED!!
yeah... funny
vernhestand 2 years ago
Comment removed
apologeticsman 2 years ago
win, big, big win! thanks for uplifting my spirit with this.
DiceWarwick 2 years ago 2
I have a whole playlist of videos I've made in this style, including another with Ben Stein, Rick Warren, Kent Hovind, Ray Comfort, Kirk Cameron, and others. There's a link in the annotation to this video.
SeenAndNotSeen 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
metalpsalm 2 years ago
Fail.
Notice the category "comedy."
Notice that the video is part of a playlist called "How Do People Quote-Mine Creationists?"
Notice the word "parody" in the keywords section.
Do you honestly think I'd try to pass off an interview where Ben Stein says, "We don't know how the mammalian species stay in my jeans" as authentic?
How dense can people be?
Before you start patting yourself on the back for discovering my "lie," try putting an ounce of thought into your reply.
SeenAndNotSeen 2 years ago 2
my bad, I just flipped in and it pissed me off. Mia Copa. My comment is removed.
metalpsalm 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Chuckles Darwin put forth, as a lark, a hare-brained supposition that had been floating around since the days of Sumero-Akkadian culture, that unchecked evolutionary processes ruled the planet. He knew that, with the advent of superior technologies, his cartoonish take on life would fall by the wayside.
procommenter 2 years ago
Do not feed the troll.
SeenAndNotSeen 2 years ago
Funny!. Though i think Ben stein is smarter than the guy who made this video...
tobipotg 2 years ago
ben stein isnt smarter than anyone he is a dumb fuck
mrhippothethird 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
using trashy language as you do shows me more about your lack of intelligence...
jameans78 2 years ago
someone has too much time on their hands.......
bergeronmandd 2 years ago
Hah, awesome!
SexyMelon 3 years ago 2
This is hilarious. Thank you.
Xerock 3 years ago
5 Stars, Very amusing you made stein sound inteligent and that deserves 5 stars on its own.
billythefifer 3 years ago 2
rofl, definately clipping worthy of 5 stars and huge amounts of laughter!
*APPPLAUSE*
GronTheMighty 3 years ago
Great stuff, SeenAndNotSeen! Keep it up :-)
CrimsonScythe 3 years ago
Awesome...i lol'd the whole time.
5 *rd and favorited!
Mark27nj 3 years ago
Good job Seenandnotseen. Some parts are mixed really smoothly as if he actually said it. Made me lol. Thanx dude.
kubush 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nice bit of quote mining/distortion *sarcastic smile*.
Congratulations, too. You have lost all credibility with me, on just the first video of yours I've seen.
phillippi2 3 years ago
Notice the category "Comedy."
While I am heartbroken that I have "lost all credibility" with you, you missed the point entirely.
SeenAndNotSeen 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Seriously, though, there are comments all over the place from people who think the video is funny, and even from people who are offended but realize that it's not supposed to be real.
Plus, I have a whole playlist (labeled "Comedy") on my channel called "How do People Quote-Mine Creationists?" with many other videos of mine. Is that not obvious enough for you?
Last time I checked, jumping to conclusions about me based solely on a stunning misinterpretation of one video wasn't very "skeptical."
SeenAndNotSeen 3 years ago
Wow. How retarded do you have to be to not get that this is suppose to be funny? Hence, the Comedy category.
kubush 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How is this funny? You cut audio pieces and put them together to make it seem that he's pro-atheism / pro-evolution. You're right, seenandnotseen, I'm lmao... NOT.
Funny though about your name, seenandnotseen, since the Bible does state that those things which are seen are temporal (prone to change over time) and those things which are unseen are eternal. Science will NEVER explain WHY things are the way they are, it only discloses how things work, and only superficially at that.
TheSmoonge 3 years ago
That's very insightful... NOT!
Thank you, Borat.
SeenAndNotSeen 3 years ago
Have you ever considered that you are not the target audience???
kubush 3 years ago
Will you please join me in praying that God will thwart the plans of wicked men and confuse the speech on those who speak evil?
lue65 3 years ago
I think I already did a good job confusing the speech of Ben Stein. As for thwarting his plans, well, the American movie-going public already did that by not seeing his movie.
SeenAndNotSeen 3 years ago
The same " God" sound bite helps at least to make it easy to see the editing for people, it reminds me the time I edited Star Wars to take Jar Jar out.
UserAlan1 3 years ago
5 stars!
TheRedneckAtheist 3 years ago
Hilarious!
Good editing that.
SexyMelon 3 years ago
I sure have lost a lot of respect for Ben Stein.
Mxyzptlk562 3 years ago
haha.. funny vid.. good editing. Giving the creationists a dose of their own medicine, huh? good job!
agg323181 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Seen and not seen: What a waste of time to take Ben Stein's audio track and splice it to rearrange his spoken words. Try to do something more worthwhile with your life.
JDtheMusicMan 3 years ago
Any real comments?
SeenAndNotSeen 3 years ago
Funny, it seems like more people have seen (and liked) this video than have seen Stein's movie. I could just as easily say that it was a waste of time for Expelled's producers to trick scientists into being interviewed and launching a propaganda campaign against evolution while exploiting the Holocaust, all without providing any scientific evidence for ID. Stein makes a movie about evolution while having no idea what it even is: He thinks Charles Darwin has something to do with the Big Bang!
SeenAndNotSeen 3 years ago
But apparently I struck a nerve. This video is comedic. People enjoy it. I enjoy it. I had fun making it four months ago. It was therfore very worthwhile. Of course, it's not my whole life. I've got to wonder about you, though. You seem pretty bitter, and not the least bit creative. Otherwise, you wouldn't have used the pathetic "Get a life!" ad hominem that people use when they have nothing intelligent to say. I would address your argument further, but you don't have one. Go cry somewhere else.
SeenAndNotSeen 3 years ago
this guy sounds smarter when someone edits what he says to mean the exact opposite
latinanarchist 3 years ago 4
This is HILARIOUS! You are BRILLIANT, SeenAndNotSeen!
YeeshaOfMyst 3 years ago 3
nice editing moron!
toucheyang 3 years ago
Thanks! I did do a pretty good job of editing moron, but I think he prefers to be called "Ben Stein."
SeenAndNotSeen 3 years ago
well said! :D
hellshade2 3 years ago
Oh, so I guess Ben Stein isn't as dumb as I thought...psych!
theshredator 3 years ago
That was rather amusing.
Quote mining at its finest.
PrometheusWithLight 3 years ago
lol
RyuuKagutsuchi 3 years ago
Nice editing! Well done!
The11thgrape 3 years ago
hehehehehehe LoL GOOD ONE!
kulturni 3 years ago
HAHAAHAH a taste of their own meds
Hey religious freaks . . . Not very nice having shit taken out of context is it?
hahahahaha WANKERS!!!
ialexcampbell 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahahaha ur self
1 who ever made this used different word or sayings he said to make him say what he/she wanted and even if he did speak out about it so. he might of used 2 been an evolutionist and changed as he found out bout the real evidence.
21lrigratiug 3 years ago
What real evidence?
Terrencje 3 years ago
wooooooooooops i accidentally posted tht under my brothers site, 21irigratiug!!! gosh!!! he never logs out!!!!!!!!!
jsticewilbefound 3 years ago
sistem. His *moronic* voice, you mean? Haha, he's a complete retard and a moron, and he sounds like one, too..
winterstellar 3 years ago
Wow it's soo easy to edit Ben Stein's speech because of his monotonic voice. Haha.
SistemaKaoso 3 years ago
lol
deadman1144 3 years ago
Haha, pretty funny. The irony tickles me.
cappastrano 3 years ago
The question is "which is funnier, this or Ben Stein's real comments promoting this film?" "Science leads to killing people." is my favorite.
busymartian 3 years ago 15
Alas, I made this before hearing about Stein's science-murder link.
SeenAndNotSeen 3 years ago
""Science leads to killing people." is my favorite."
I find the very expression "the movie 'Big Science' doesn't want you to see!" the most laughable. It's the same "Big Science" that developed the "Clear Eyes" eye drops that Stein is a spokesman for.
Given the fact that he's made a mockery of the products name "Clear Eyes," if I were them I'd sue Stein's ass off.
EndCredulity 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Richard "Dick" Dawkins is the world's leading Darwinian Evangelist and he's been caught with his pants down committing the ultimate evolutionism no-no by admitting to Intelligent Design. It's hilarious how all Dawkins disciples are obsessed with blaming clever editing when the film was in constant motion.
The fact is that Dawkins has officially be busted for Felonious Cock Sucking while attempting to Swallow the Evidence!
Even Stein's critics agree Dawkins has forever disgraced himself!
CurtusLove 3 years ago
Blocked.
You are obviously the same person as MsLatosi. You are both Canadian accounts, registered between Sept. 5 and 6, 2007. You have numerous other sock puppet accounts and subscribers, all while making no videos, but simply spamming.
SeenAndNotSeen 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow
so fake...
farmboy25 3 years ago
You don't say?
SeenAndNotSeen 3 years ago
Asshole.
Godzilla1985 3 years ago