You want the ultimate WWII-Simulation? Heart of Iron 3 is the most realistic one for all wannabe generals and politicians. Economy, resources, treaties, research, battle-calculation. Everything is based on real facts. A must for every strategic general. I played it months over months with growing enthusiasm.
@Eddsaysftw actualy u r right, i sound like a moron cuz of a perfection thing
what can i say im a cynic just like to call ppl idiots to make me feel smarter im just like u(this is no sarcasm like in last comment), we should be friends(this is sarcasm)
but lets be real most ppl are idiots and by calling them idiots most of the time im right
(if u r reading this and laughing, dont it may be you!!!)
@mrsblau2992 Vichy was just about that size. Also, Britain did have troops in Yugoslavia, just like they did in Greece and France. He knows the Soviet Union wasn't conquered all at once like that, he just didn't see the point of making 10 extra slides of just the advancement into the Soviet Union, so he showed where the border's were after their main thrust, and when it was a stalemate. Same for Italy. Normandy wasn't shown as the individual allied states, just as the "Allies". Nothing in africa
@mrsblau2992 Don't call him an idiot over a few mistakes. Isn't that what makes us human? I'm sorry you think it's inadequate, but if your not happy with it, instead of criticizing him, you try making it like this. Also, he has at least 8 more simulations about World War 2, most of them covering Africa, and showing the border change better, and more accurate dates. By the way, this was done by a 13-14 year old at the time.
@LPKoki yugoslavia wasnt at first communist state, they were serbian nationalist ruled by king and later when tito ruled they turned their back to stalin
A partial truth is no real truth: there is nothing about the annexions of the USSR: the Baltic States, East Poland, Bessarabia and Bukowina - plus the aggresion war against Finland! We don't need such partial truths!
Great video! I am doing a project on WWII Vets. If you know someone who I can interview, please let me know. My e-mail: swimtori82@yahoo.com I can do phone interviews w/ them or in person interviews. I am trying to get as many interviews as possible. Thank you!
no not so easy. the soviet union had the most dead in WW2 just to defeat germany ( over 19,600,000 deaths), while germany 'only' had 6,890,000 deaths.
@Tomenable What is the flag of Monaco, you need to make yourself understandable? The flag that is used as the Polish flag is actually the Indonesian flag too, but the Polish flag does have the red stripe on the bottom.
This is what I hate about youtube, some kid throws together an MS-Paint video, and people flood it with comments about the holocaust, white guilt, Zionist, and all sorts of wacky conspiracies
Quite good. My only quibble is the failure to show Soviet aggression in Europe before Barbarossa; it makes it seem that Poland was left half-free and the Baltics, Finland, etc were unmolested. Apart from that, I enjoy your simulations!
@MrSmithey77 In part, but the Soviet Union would have won in the end. If the Americans hadn't entered the war it would have taken them 5 to 10 more years to win it, but they still would have won. The Soviets had far better weapon then the Germans, and could make then in far larger numbers then the German could. This is why in World War 2 movies you always hear the German commander threatening to sent people to the Eastern Front.
(In Hitler Voice) Soviet Union: Germany is trying to take down our great party started by Lenin! We shall take down those tiny bastards! Hitler is nothing but a big, stupid, bastard!!!
@ MrCrusader363 i agree with you and if only he had been loyal ,at least until the fall of the allies, to stalin then this world would not be overpopulated or full of homos.
@Dukefanforever4 stalin wasnt worse than hilter. He was invaded and the Soviets had pride(which the Russians still carry) that they have never been defeated on their own land, but Stalin did however only have gear and weapons for 1 out of 4 soldiers which is fucked up by todays expectations. Hilter was much much worse without a doubt
@MattttG3 Dude, read up on your history. Hitler may have hated Jews, but Stalin hated fucking EVERYONE. He ordered the deaths of many more millions than Hitler. Around 20-30 million, actually. And, he had concentration camps too.
Finland was not an Axis power. During the Finnish civil war (1918) the "whites" (conservatives with support from Germany) fought against the "reds" (social democrats with support from Russian Soviet Republic). The "whites" won the war, and Finland became an independent democracy. In 1939 USSR attacked Finland, but a peace treaty was made in 1940. Finland never participated in World War 2
I don't know what books you read but Yugoslavia liberated herself from the Axis,without the fuckin SSSR's help.One of reasons why we weren't in the Warsaw pakt.
@MrCrusader363 Wtf? Do you realize that his intentions were not only to conquer Europe, but the entire world?! To literally kill millions upon million of people?! Guess what race of people he killed most? WHITES! WHITE Jews, WHITE Gypsies, WHITE Homosexuals, WHITE mentally and physically disabled people. How dare you sit there and praise him for what he did! I'm completely disgusted at not only your racism, but also your ignorence. Go read a book and educate yourself. And btw, I'm not white!
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 JEWS WANT TO GENOCIDE THE WHITE PEOPLE TOO SO SHOULD THE FUCK UP AND START READING HISTORY WHICH ISNT POLLUTED BY ZIONISTS IDIOT 88 SIEG HEIL 88
@longyearbyen17 HA! You make claims you can't back up! I am not a Jew XD And to say bullshit like that is absoluety horrible... what the hell to you have against Jews anyway? Ask yourself, honestly, did Jews do anything to you personally? Put yourself into to position of a Jew in the past several centuries. They have endured hardships than your ignorent ass could even begin to imagine. Like I said, i'm not a Jew, but I do feel sympathy for them.
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 Hitler never killed disabled people. He banned them from breeding. Healthy Man + Healthy Woman = High chance of healthy baby. Disabled Man + Healthy or Disabled Woman = Higher than usual chance of disabled child. To be honest I don't think disabled people should be allowed to breed. No doubt we would have less disabled people if they weren't allowed to breed. "It is the duty of the strong to protect the weak". It is only the weak that say that.
@BetaDanU100 Hitler sent mentally and physically disabled people to labour camps, where they worked... to death. So did others who were sent to such places. To me, that's extermination too, just as the systematic killing of Jews & Slavs. Not to start a big argument with you but, it's not the disabled people's fault if they are born the way they are. So why should they face discrimination from society over something they can't change? Empathy is the key, we shouldn't repeat Hitler's mistakes! :)
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 I understand what you're saying. Hitler wanted a pure race of humans. Being healthy was apart of being pure in his mind. Even though what Hitler did to disabled people was and is considered bad on a moral level, it was good on a different level. He was really trying to help the world. To do that he needed to rule it. To secure peace, you must prepare for war.
@BetaDanU100 You should know that every, and I do mean every, person alive in the world carries a, if not more then one, disability in there DNA even if they them selves do not "have" the disability. You can't have a "pure" Human in the way your are thinking because all Humans are in fact 'pure' Human. All the disabilities that a Human can have are in fact written into our DNA and are in fact Human traits. Therefor All people are, with or without a disability, 'pure' Human.
@MysteriousAlly I was actually thinking about exactly what you just said here! And you're totally correct, man! Thank you for posting this piece of info for everyone to read an look into.
@MysteriousAlly By disablity I mean any obvious disabilty like mental or physical retardation, blindness ect. I'm assuming that's also what Hitler meant by disability too.
@BetaDanU100 Everyone carries the traits for those: everyone. Even you and me, just because the you or I don't "have" any disabilities does not mean that you, I, or anyone aren't carries. Everyone is a carry for one or more disability. If you want to remove these traits then all of Humanly must be kill. That should be stated that Hitler's "plan" would have resulted in more inbreeding and thus more people with disabilities. Eugenics is a failed science for a reason.
@MysteriousAlly Maybe we carry traits of blindness but we aren't blind. Hitler wanted to kill people who had the disability. I am not blind, I do not have down syndrome or any other disablity. Maybe I do carry it in my blood but that doesn't mean I have it. We're just splitting hairs now.
The only reason there are so many disabled people in the world is because natural selection no longer exists for humans. We help the weak now.
@BetaDanU100 The point was that Hitler's ideas would never have worked, and yes we do seem to be going in a circle. You are also correct in saying there is no natural selection for Humanly, but that isn't the reason, or at the very least not a big factor. That is a hole other topic that I don't feel going into. I'll leave it where it stands, and I'll let people think what they will. I care little because in the big picture it matters little what is said here in the comments of this video.
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 he wanted to expand east for living space for hes people, he wanted peace with Britain and even offered to give them western europe so he can deal with russia
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 I find it funny that you call him ignorant, yet you say Hitler wanted to conquer the world. I think you should learn your World War 2 history.
@tyleroliver No, I believe you should dig a little deeper in your research. He, his head officers and advisors had formulated a step-by-step plan for the conquest of the world. First was to take control of Europe, thr British Isles included. Then to take North Africa and capture the Suez canal in Egypt as to have a major supply route from the Mediterranean to the Indian ocean. After that, it was on to the Middle East and Asia Minor for the large oil and natural gas supply to fuel his army,
@tyleroliver After, Hitler was planning to reform South America under Nazi control (most likely without any milittary occupation). And yes, there is proof of the reformation plan, just search it. And once he has control of a very large amount of materials for war production and of course volunteers from many European countries to fight alongside the Germans (people from Spain, France, Italy, Austria, etc all volunteered) who is to say he wouldn't have moved onto central Asia?
@tyleroliver It's been widely proven that Hitler's intention was to conquer the world, then have it divided between Germany and it's allies. So please, don't make assumptions that I have any lack of knowledge on the subject. I'm sure you could also share useful info here! My imput is not here to start any arguments. I'd be happy to read any facts you have :) Oh, and forgive my spelling of the word, 'the' in the first reply lol XD
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 No. Hitler wanted to make Germany extend into Eastern Europe to make "living space" for the German people by killing 70-90% of the Polish population and the same for Eastern Russia. He never wanted world domination, he wanted glory for Germany. His intentions are detailed in Mein Kampf and are put well in The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.
@tyleroliver Mein Kampf is obviously his intentions at the time, but he wrote this while in prison. Things may have changed later in his life once he actually was in power. And if he wanted "living space", why then would we wage war in western Europe at all? I get that there was somewhat of a revenge factor relating to the first world war but it makes little sense. And most of the Russian people were to be used as slave labour, not out-right murdered. That also applies to the Polish gentiles :P
@MrCrusader363 Lol your IQ Is so Small. The Rock won. My Dirt underneath my boots gets more respect than you, And your on a youtube channel. Lol. Educate yourself, you impeckrable basterd.
yugoslavia and greece were the last free countries to be taken, when the third reich started invasion of soviet union and delayed operation barbarossa.
@MrSino94 doesn't matter...fuck turkey and all of them!!!!!!!!!!!!! CYPRUS IS CYPRUS..TURKEY IS TURKEY...i'll only accept if Cyprus is Greek but NOT CYPRUS IS TURKEY!!!!!!! FUCK
I AM GOING TO KILL SOMEONE!! Cyprus is not turkish!!! Why do you all think it is turkish land? Fuck them all of them. They occupy only 37% of our country those bastards and i dont want to see anyone else say we are turkish!! Cyprus is cypriot!!!!
I hate it, in all WWs france lost and then they mean(after they got help of Britain, America and Russia from East) they could say what germany have to give them.
But i like the part at 0:46 where Germany won against france and britain at same time ;D
@KaktusMovies Hello? The French Republic was a victorious power in both World Wars. Germany was soundly defeated and the entire world was happy about it.
@celloswiss Im happy that we lost the WW 2 but france would be defeatet without Britain help and Invasion form East. And thats right but france would be defeatet!
@KaktusMovies France and England had to divide their forces in Africa and in the Balkans to fight the Ottoman Empire. Austria was a much more effective ally than the Russian Empire crippled by civil war.
@MaxRW for somebody who gives the impression of being intelligent, you have in just two comments shown your ignorance, your self righteousness and your total lack of respect for millions of people who gave their lives so you can speak freely today. and for all intents and purposes, Germany did beat France in WW1, and WW2, you have a lot to be grateful for, thanks to the actions of others. France's lack of Backbone and weak army in nearly all conflicts after Napoleon, has cost many inncoent lives
@jonnygb4 The official name of France is "République française" and I don't get mad because you don't use it ... you're just ridiculous... Outside Britain, England and Britain are used as synonyms, just deal with it. A lack of backbone? Remember that the British never fought alone in any of the conflicts of their fucking entire history, that tells a lot... Except of course when it comes to civil wars or slaughtering primitive tribes, but that's an other story.
@MaxRWF "the British never fought alone in any of the conflicts"-The Falklands. against the Argentinian army, an army using french made missiles. oh yeah we won, other largely victorious solo conflicts include The anglo-egpt war 1951-52, Anglo-turk, Gunboat war, Opium wars, Boer wars, Cod wars, Anglo-Burma, Anglo-Zanzibar among others, Hilariously the same cannot be said about France, no solo victories post '45, and very few before. "monsieur Hitler J'abandonne"! !!RULE BRITANNIA!!
@jonnygb4 Haha, being proud to have won against Zanzibari tribesmen, that's so ridiculous. You're only citing wars against third world countries! Did England ever conquered a single civilized nation? No. In WWII England fled the battlefield at the first gunshot and just sat on its island waiting for American help. With allies like you, we don't need ennemies... Since Vietnam, France won all its conflicts, get your facts right moron. I keep saying England, cause Scotland will soon be independent.
@MaxRWF Im scottish you stupid cunt. "tribesmen" how many tribes have artillery batteries and battleships? the Gunboat war was against Denmark, Cod wars agains Iceland, Turkish war against the ottomans, Egypt, china, German/dutch forces in the Boer wars, which one of them is 3rd world? im going to ignore your stupid WW2, and take is as complete irony that a Frenchman would accuse anyone else in the world of cowardice, You bastards have won no wars alone since WW2, you cant match Britains success
@jonnygb4 African-Asian countries were no match for European tactics and weaponry, their "artillery" in the 19th century dates back to the 18 or 17th century. Wow England won against great Empires such as Iceland and Denmark, what a pride ! lol. England genocided the poor Boer civilian population ? What a succes ! Since 1945, France won in Algeria (1962), Congo (1978), Tchad (2005), Ivory Coast (2011), etc. So when did England conquered a civilized nation by itself? You still haven't answered...
@MaxRWF the you have to be Joking, you say "African Asian countries were no match.." then boast about fighting Congo, However NEED I remind you that France was aided by Belgian forces in '78, acted as a Neutral force in the Ivory coast not a lone belligerent, and you in fact lost the Algerian war in '62 and to Answer your question--India, Egypt and Ireland, all had sizable forces, and before you try to be clever about India, remember that the french had an Indian empire, but ours was Bigger
@jonnygb4 Each French military operation in the Algerian War was succesfull and are still studied in military academies.They gained independence via referendum. India didn't even exist in the 18th c. it was made of feudal states. The Egyptian army was corrupted and ill-equiped, most regiments still had muzzle-loading muskets and some other still wore medieval cuirasses. Ireland, an other big empire England conquered? By contrast, the French flag waved over Vienna, Berlin, Moscow, Madrid, Rome...
@MaxRWF face it, The British had the best managed, biggest, and most famous empire in the world, France had Napoleon for a bit. nearly 400 years of international rule, vs about 80 in Europe. The reaches of the British Empire far outreach the pathetic attempts of anyone else, especially the French. Hence the fact you're speaking to me now in English, not in french. your arguments are flawed and you're living in a fantasy where people care about what a little frenchman did before he was carted off
@jonnygb4 Sorry to break the bubble you live in, but I'm currently speaking US English. Who would have known that English failure to keep its 13 colonies would lead the USA to be a cultural superpower in the 20th c ? Even in England, kids speak a US pidgin, thanks to US cultural influence. The peak of the English empire only lasted between the end of the 19th c. and the beginning of the 20th c. The French Empire had a much more lasting impact (civil code, metric system, rights of men...).
@MaxRWF Oh my god, you are so stupid. please give me examples of the Americanisms you have said to me, which are distinctively different to that of British English. other than that all of the shite you've been spouting is false and misplaced. Im not even going to answer your retarded claims about the so called legacy of the French. you're good for cheese and renaults.
germany was so strong that we had paris and moscow and the rest
CrazyPhilMachine 1 day ago
and what japan did is nothing?
CrazyPhilMachine 1 day ago
So completely skipped over the original British conflicts in North Africa. No biggie.
IAmBuddydedum 4 days ago
Yeah! Russia kicked ass!
MUSER1993 4 days ago
i like my country flag. she is upside down
leecooper9911 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chuck Norris was born on May 6th 1945. Nazi Germany surrendered on May 7th 1945. Coincidence? I. THINK. NOT..
TheZeroLandofDarknes 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chuck Norris was born on May 6th 1945. Nazi Germany surrendered on May 7th 1945. Coincidence? I. THINK. NOT..
TheZeroLandofDarknes 2 weeks ago
You want the ultimate WWII-Simulation? Heart of Iron 3 is the most realistic one for all wannabe generals and politicians. Economy, resources, treaties, research, battle-calculation. Everything is based on real facts. A must for every strategic general. I played it months over months with growing enthusiasm.
wonderfalg 2 weeks ago
it's Romania fool
Alexander99602 2 weeks ago
booaaahh wie kann man nur soo dumm sein...die polenflagge ist weiß rot und was du da abbildest ist die flagge von monaco du idiot
LwowPolskaIIRP 3 weeks ago 3
polland wasnt conquer like that
british widrow to dunkirk not central franc
vichy was smaller than that and had northen africa
british werent in yugoslavia
soviets werent conquerd at once like that
allied conquering italy was very slow
allies didnt enter germany at 1944
in normady americans fight west(chesbourgh) and british to east(caen)
u miss more important part of north africa and u miss half of eastern front
once again this simulation was made by idiot
mrsblau2992 3 weeks ago
@mrsblau2992 Your grammar makes you sound like an idiot.
Eddsaysftw 3 weeks ago
@Eddsaysftw i hoped someone smart as you would be able to point that
other ppl who didnt saw were just mentaly retarded, thank god there is someone like you to show us light
young man you should feel smart
mrsblau2992 3 weeks ago
@mrsblau2992 Well you are in no position to call someone an idiot because he hadn't embraced perfection, when you sound like an idiot yourself.
Eddsaysftw 3 weeks ago
@Eddsaysftw actualy u r right, i sound like a moron cuz of a perfection thing
what can i say im a cynic just like to call ppl idiots to make me feel smarter im just like u(this is no sarcasm like in last comment), we should be friends(this is sarcasm)
but lets be real most ppl are idiots and by calling them idiots most of the time im right
(if u r reading this and laughing, dont it may be you!!!)
mrsblau2992 3 weeks ago
@mrsblau2992 Vichy was just about that size. Also, Britain did have troops in Yugoslavia, just like they did in Greece and France. He knows the Soviet Union wasn't conquered all at once like that, he just didn't see the point of making 10 extra slides of just the advancement into the Soviet Union, so he showed where the border's were after their main thrust, and when it was a stalemate. Same for Italy. Normandy wasn't shown as the individual allied states, just as the "Allies". Nothing in africa
napbonaparte1805 2 weeks ago
@mrsblau2992 Don't call him an idiot over a few mistakes. Isn't that what makes us human? I'm sorry you think it's inadequate, but if your not happy with it, instead of criticizing him, you try making it like this. Also, he has at least 8 more simulations about World War 2, most of them covering Africa, and showing the border change better, and more accurate dates. By the way, this was done by a 13-14 year old at the time.
napbonaparte1805 2 weeks ago
Die zweite Hälfte gefällt mir gar nicht ..^^
XDERMAAARCXx94 1 month ago
@XDERMAAARCXx94 Sack...
HL2BeTAFaN22 3 weeks ago
3:29 dare you touch yugoslavia fuckin nazi hellpigs
Sovient Union = Big Brother :D <3
LPKoki 1 month ago
@LPKoki yugoslavia wasnt at first communist state, they were serbian nationalist ruled by king and later when tito ruled they turned their back to stalin
mrsblau2992 3 weeks ago
@mrsblau2992
i know but i dont know what the hell did I wrote so apologize if i wrote that probably i wrote that communism is good as i know me :D
LPKoki 3 weeks ago
And Sweden is unaffected as usual XP
pappaolof 1 month ago
germany , los the world 1 and world war 2 ... haha
alonzodono 1 month ago
@alonzodono Yeah they say Germany has lost but where is all the gold they took ? surely not back to people they took from...
Vid0vdan1389 1 month ago
A partial truth is no real truth: there is nothing about the annexions of the USSR: the Baltic States, East Poland, Bessarabia and Bukowina - plus the aggresion war against Finland! We don't need such partial truths!
venetic44 1 month ago
Yugoslavia and Greece were conquered in 1941.
CrackerXZ 1 month ago
nice job. these are really interesting. thank you so much for your effort !!!
swann62 1 month ago
that's not the polish flag..
hello72039 1 month ago
why so many dislikes
MrMarcopolo325 1 month ago
KURDE DLACZEGO KAŻDY NAS MA ZA MONAKO
MrSpokoZiom 1 month ago
@MrSpokoZiom MONAKO albo INDONEZJA bo mają takie same flagi
cedro111 1 month ago
Can you plz make videos about the expansion of Serbian, Bulgarian and Hungarian empire?
Polterize 1 month ago
why is there no spanish marocco?
MrJazztobak 2 months ago
@MrJazztobak :-)
chmielluk144 2 months ago
Comment removed
MrJazztobak 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great video! I am doing a project on WWII Vets. If you know someone who I can interview, please let me know. My e-mail: swimtori82@yahoo.com I can do phone interviews w/ them or in person interviews. I am trying to get as many interviews as possible. Thank you!
MsToriStory 2 months ago
lol indonesian flag on poland
battlefieldhebat 2 months ago
Soviet union raped the nazi germany easily
HCHotPenguin 2 months ago
@HCHotPenguin
no not so easy. the soviet union had the most dead in WW2 just to defeat germany ( over 19,600,000 deaths), while germany 'only' had 6,890,000 deaths.
MyPoketubing 1 month ago
@HCHotPenguin Winter raped nazi germany not soviet union. :D
MuppetLord1 1 month ago
cannot stop looking at that retarded polish flag, its wrong
MrSagagothic 2 months ago
Worse than first your map x..x
KnigtOfSwan 2 months ago
what a idiot!!! are you drunk?
Ursuss21 2 months ago
albania rofl
Hexaron 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Poland has got bad flag
kominful 2 months ago
oh god thank you for destroyed poland It sux so badly
mannstein934 2 months ago
LOL Monaco?
Lumbago04 2 months ago
ROMANIA!!!!!!!!!!!!
TheDWM90 2 months ago
0:30 World War 2 began with the German and Soviet invasion of MONACO!
Tomenable 2 months ago
@Tomenable What?
nazurea 2 months ago
@nazurea
This is the flag of Monaco.
Tomenable 2 months ago
@Tomenable What is the flag of Monaco, you need to make yourself understandable? The flag that is used as the Polish flag is actually the Indonesian flag too, but the Polish flag does have the red stripe on the bottom.
Nazurea
PS. Fresh you`r grammar.
nazurea 2 months ago
0:55 WTF?
Norwegian733 2 months ago
I love the risk sound effects.
Joesolo13 3 months ago
i didn't see any canadian flags. did you intend that the british flag would represent it as well as all it's colonies and dominions?
TheMarcasus 3 months ago
Why does Poland have the Indonesian flag to represent it?
pieboy6000 3 months ago
RUMANIA IS IT?
petergriffen360 3 months ago
I did not know, Indonesia is in FUCKING EUROPE! Damn . . .
XvallorX 3 months ago
Germany could have won if they never attacked the Soviet Union.
MysteriousAlly 3 months ago
This is what I hate about youtube, some kid throws together an MS-Paint video, and people flood it with comments about the holocaust, white guilt, Zionist, and all sorts of wacky conspiracies
Qz501 3 months ago
which world map did you use???
Liverman90 3 months ago
Quite good. My only quibble is the failure to show Soviet aggression in Europe before Barbarossa; it makes it seem that Poland was left half-free and the Baltics, Finland, etc were unmolested. Apart from that, I enjoy your simulations!
Lacedaemonia 3 months ago
Hitler was a bad military commander.
paulerate 3 months ago
Better than your first attempt, but the polish guy is right. You show the polish flag upside down
whatsupdocgr 3 months ago
It seems like Europe started winning the war when the Americans came in..
MrSmithey77 3 months ago
@MrSmithey77 In part, but the Soviet Union would have won in the end. If the Americans hadn't entered the war it would have taken them 5 to 10 more years to win it, but they still would have won. The Soviets had far better weapon then the Germans, and could make then in far larger numbers then the German could. This is why in World War 2 movies you always hear the German commander threatening to sent people to the Eastern Front.
MysteriousAlly 3 months ago
(In Hitler Voice) Soviet Union: Germany is trying to take down our great party started by Lenin! We shall take down those tiny bastards! Hitler is nothing but a big, stupid, bastard!!!
1tobedoneX 3 months ago
The Finnish borders are wrong at the end of the video.
MembThePenguinIII 3 months ago
@ MrCrusader363 i agree with you and if only he had been loyal ,at least until the fall of the allies, to stalin then this world would not be overpopulated or full of homos.
-hail hitler, mein fürher
Lordhades36 3 months ago
ıf they stopped half of the eurpe 'll be germans
BerkinuA 3 months ago
@Dukefanforever4 Yes, but he was also a tactical and military GENIUS.
vimarandy 4 months ago
@Dukefanforever4 That can be debated. I am not saying i disagree, but it can be debated.
Farvai0 4 months ago
You got to admire Hitlers leadership. How he actually almost conquerd europe and a little of africa.
SovietGamers 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
85-90% of Wermacht fought in East front.
90% of Germ military losses were on East front also.
Landlease gave only 4% of USSR milit. production. Moreover it begin go in USSR only in 1943 and was paid by gold (thx anyway).
The only reason of D-day was only not to admit occup. of Western Euro by Stalin.
To that moment spinebone of Wermacht was already broken by russians.
North Africa. Ha-ha! One german division! At that time hundreds of german divisions at East.
zipmantube 4 months ago
"Apocalypse The Second World War"..best documentary I've seen
DrigerSaphire22 4 months ago
Polska nie ma takiej flagi -_-
Poland has got bad flag OMG
ThePatrol700 4 months ago 32
@ThePatrol700 wait, i know!
''polska nie ma takiej flagi'' means : ''Poland doesnt have such flag.'' right? i know cuz im croatian ;)
on croatian : ''Poljska nema takvu zastavu'' ;D
KmarkecGamer 2 months ago 17
@KmarkecGamer greetings fellow slavanian from Bulgaria
MultiBulgarin 1 month ago
@KmarkecGamer I thought croatia spoke serbian?
MultiBulgarin 1 month ago
@MultiBulgarin hahaha no ;D
bosnian talk croatian, bosnian and serbian. serbia serbian and croatia croatian. actually, thats everything same ;)
što delaš? :D
KmarkecGamer 1 month ago
@KmarkecGamer o okay i dont know cuz Im Bulgarian not croatian or Serban
MultiBulgarin 1 month ago
@KmarkecGamer
Polska nie ma takiej flagi - Polish doesnt have a flag like that
OgorekStudio 2 weeks ago
@OgorekStudio yes, that is wat i meant.
KmarkecGamer 2 weeks ago
@ThePatrol700 polacks cant get the joke xD
suckston 2 months ago
@ThePatrol700 to jest flaga indonezji
K1cper 1 month ago
@Dukefanforever4 stalin wasnt worse than hilter. He was invaded and the Soviets had pride(which the Russians still carry) that they have never been defeated on their own land, but Stalin did however only have gear and weapons for 1 out of 4 soldiers which is fucked up by todays expectations. Hilter was much much worse without a doubt
MattttG3 4 months ago
@MattttG3 Dude, read up on your history. Hitler may have hated Jews, but Stalin hated fucking EVERYONE. He ordered the deaths of many more millions than Hitler. Around 20-30 million, actually. And, he had concentration camps too.
XMMxmmXM 4 months ago
Great simulation but i think you are wrong with some details and important things are missing:
-Wrong flag of the social republic of Italy / Kingdom of Italy..
-____ flag of Poland
-Missing the secret alliance and attack of Poland by germany AND the soviets.
-Missing the germans-italians attacks in NorthAfrica.
-Missing out of europe conflicts..
-Missing the spain sent forces to the reich in Leningrad.
-You have put the Maginot line but you've forgot the german had built the Siegfried line also.
TheSpecialVampire 4 months ago
Comment removed
TheSpecialVampire 4 months ago
Comment removed
TheSpecialVampire 4 months ago
You completely forgot the part where USSR continued the war with Japan in the Far East. Started August 1st and Ended on September 1st.
Vitalik1Ru 4 months ago
1:55 note that Greece reached 15 km before Tirana under very hard circumstanses.
ManosGaletakis 4 months ago
Lets see if usa didnt come into this try to think what hitler could have done shame shame shame why do people hate america so much
xXxBRONXBOMBERSxXx 4 months ago
I believe it was Britain AND the U.S. who liberated Italy?
stiggyjg 4 months ago
Finland was not an Axis power. During the Finnish civil war (1918) the "whites" (conservatives with support from Germany) fought against the "reds" (social democrats with support from Russian Soviet Republic). The "whites" won the war, and Finland became an independent democracy. In 1939 USSR attacked Finland, but a peace treaty was made in 1940. Finland never participated in World War 2
madsmadser 4 months ago
omg is a BIG MAP :O what is interesant????
Andrey11275 4 months ago
0:36 This is Not Polish Flag ahahah moron.heheh
RealSlavicPoland 4 months ago
sorry but where are the African's battles!??
Antonio80804 5 months ago
I don't know what books you read but Yugoslavia liberated herself from the Axis,without the fuckin SSSR's help.One of reasons why we weren't in the Warsaw pakt.
NeeSho23496 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God bless Hitler he tried his best for a white Europe..Life would be better if he won
MrCrusader363 5 months ago
@MrCrusader363 Wtf? Do you realize that his intentions were not only to conquer Europe, but the entire world?! To literally kill millions upon million of people?! Guess what race of people he killed most? WHITES! WHITE Jews, WHITE Gypsies, WHITE Homosexuals, WHITE mentally and physically disabled people. How dare you sit there and praise him for what he did! I'm completely disgusted at not only your racism, but also your ignorence. Go read a book and educate yourself. And btw, I'm not white!
FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 5 months ago 15
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 JEWS WANT TO GENOCIDE THE WHITE PEOPLE TOO SO SHOULD THE FUCK UP AND START READING HISTORY WHICH ISNT POLLUTED BY ZIONISTS IDIOT 88 SIEG HEIL 88
longyearbyen17 4 months ago
@longyearbyen17 Go check to make sure your head is shaved correctly you freaking Neo Nazi
FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 3 months ago
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 i checked u godless zionist jew bastard
longyearbyen17 3 months ago
@longyearbyen17 HA! You make claims you can't back up! I am not a Jew XD And to say bullshit like that is absoluety horrible... what the hell to you have against Jews anyway? Ask yourself, honestly, did Jews do anything to you personally? Put yourself into to position of a Jew in the past several centuries. They have endured hardships than your ignorent ass could even begin to imagine. Like I said, i'm not a Jew, but I do feel sympathy for them.
FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 3 months ago
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 i dont care everyone who supports the zionist movement is my enemy so your a jew if you support the fasicst israeli bastard
longyearbyen17 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@longyearbyen17 Go take your shit up with someone who cares, your discrimination disgusts me. Stop pretending you know anything about Israel.
FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 3 months ago
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 u be blue
TheSwinia23 4 months ago
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 Hitler never killed disabled people. He banned them from breeding. Healthy Man + Healthy Woman = High chance of healthy baby. Disabled Man + Healthy or Disabled Woman = Higher than usual chance of disabled child. To be honest I don't think disabled people should be allowed to breed. No doubt we would have less disabled people if they weren't allowed to breed. "It is the duty of the strong to protect the weak". It is only the weak that say that.
BetaDanU100 3 months ago
@BetaDanU100 Hitler sent mentally and physically disabled people to labour camps, where they worked... to death. So did others who were sent to such places. To me, that's extermination too, just as the systematic killing of Jews & Slavs. Not to start a big argument with you but, it's not the disabled people's fault if they are born the way they are. So why should they face discrimination from society over something they can't change? Empathy is the key, we shouldn't repeat Hitler's mistakes! :)
FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 3 months ago
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 I understand what you're saying. Hitler wanted a pure race of humans. Being healthy was apart of being pure in his mind. Even though what Hitler did to disabled people was and is considered bad on a moral level, it was good on a different level. He was really trying to help the world. To do that he needed to rule it. To secure peace, you must prepare for war.
BetaDanU100 3 months ago
@BetaDanU100 You should know that every, and I do mean every, person alive in the world carries a, if not more then one, disability in there DNA even if they them selves do not "have" the disability. You can't have a "pure" Human in the way your are thinking because all Humans are in fact 'pure' Human. All the disabilities that a Human can have are in fact written into our DNA and are in fact Human traits. Therefor All people are, with or without a disability, 'pure' Human.
MysteriousAlly 3 months ago
@MysteriousAlly I was actually thinking about exactly what you just said here! And you're totally correct, man! Thank you for posting this piece of info for everyone to read an look into.
FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 3 months ago
@MysteriousAlly By disablity I mean any obvious disabilty like mental or physical retardation, blindness ect. I'm assuming that's also what Hitler meant by disability too.
BetaDanU100 3 months ago
@BetaDanU100 Everyone carries the traits for those: everyone. Even you and me, just because the you or I don't "have" any disabilities does not mean that you, I, or anyone aren't carries. Everyone is a carry for one or more disability. If you want to remove these traits then all of Humanly must be kill. That should be stated that Hitler's "plan" would have resulted in more inbreeding and thus more people with disabilities. Eugenics is a failed science for a reason.
MysteriousAlly 3 months ago
@MysteriousAlly Maybe we carry traits of blindness but we aren't blind. Hitler wanted to kill people who had the disability. I am not blind, I do not have down syndrome or any other disablity. Maybe I do carry it in my blood but that doesn't mean I have it. We're just splitting hairs now.
The only reason there are so many disabled people in the world is because natural selection no longer exists for humans. We help the weak now.
BetaDanU100 3 months ago
@BetaDanU100 The point was that Hitler's ideas would never have worked, and yes we do seem to be going in a circle. You are also correct in saying there is no natural selection for Humanly, but that isn't the reason, or at the very least not a big factor. That is a hole other topic that I don't feel going into. I'll leave it where it stands, and I'll let people think what they will. I care little because in the big picture it matters little what is said here in the comments of this video.
MysteriousAlly 3 months ago
Schwachsinn erster Guete dieses Video
48grufty 3 months ago
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 he wanted to expand east for living space for hes people, he wanted peace with Britain and even offered to give them western europe so he can deal with russia
hades1234567 3 months ago
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 I find it funny that you call him ignorant, yet you say Hitler wanted to conquer the world. I think you should learn your World War 2 history.
tyleroliver 2 months ago
@tyleroliver No, I believe you should dig a little deeper in your research. He, his head officers and advisors had formulated a step-by-step plan for the conquest of the world. First was to take control of Europe, thr British Isles included. Then to take North Africa and capture the Suez canal in Egypt as to have a major supply route from the Mediterranean to the Indian ocean. After that, it was on to the Middle East and Asia Minor for the large oil and natural gas supply to fuel his army,
FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 2 months ago
@tyleroliver After, Hitler was planning to reform South America under Nazi control (most likely without any milittary occupation). And yes, there is proof of the reformation plan, just search it. And once he has control of a very large amount of materials for war production and of course volunteers from many European countries to fight alongside the Germans (people from Spain, France, Italy, Austria, etc all volunteered) who is to say he wouldn't have moved onto central Asia?
FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 2 months ago
@tyleroliver It's been widely proven that Hitler's intention was to conquer the world, then have it divided between Germany and it's allies. So please, don't make assumptions that I have any lack of knowledge on the subject. I'm sure you could also share useful info here! My imput is not here to start any arguments. I'd be happy to read any facts you have :) Oh, and forgive my spelling of the word, 'the' in the first reply lol XD
FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 2 months ago
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 No. Hitler wanted to make Germany extend into Eastern Europe to make "living space" for the German people by killing 70-90% of the Polish population and the same for Eastern Russia. He never wanted world domination, he wanted glory for Germany. His intentions are detailed in Mein Kampf and are put well in The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.
tyleroliver 2 months ago
@tyleroliver Mein Kampf is obviously his intentions at the time, but he wrote this while in prison. Things may have changed later in his life once he actually was in power. And if he wanted "living space", why then would we wage war in western Europe at all? I get that there was somewhat of a revenge factor relating to the first world war but it makes little sense. And most of the Russian people were to be used as slave labour, not out-right murdered. That also applies to the Polish gentiles :P
FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 2 months ago
@FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 white gypsies. yeeeeeeeeeeeees.....of course. that doesn't exist unfortunately.
0v3rp0w3r 2 months ago
@0v3rp0w3r I've met a few :P
FaCeLeSsEnEmY777 2 months ago
@MrCrusader363 Lol your IQ Is so Small. The Rock won. My Dirt underneath my boots gets more respect than you, And your on a youtube channel. Lol. Educate yourself, you impeckrable basterd.
CallumRocks1000 3 months ago
yugoslavia and greece were the last free countries to be taken, when the third reich started invasion of soviet union and delayed operation barbarossa.
Southgateboy 5 months ago
Missing the Soviet attack on Poland 1939 and Soviet attack on Finland 1939-1940.
Octavius0 5 months ago
crtazy germany have no alliance look spain portugal jugoslayya turkey is free go help them and alliance crazy hitler
cengizsogutlu 5 months ago
eeeeermmm de north of morroco was a spanish solony, no french ok?
Mithos661 5 months ago
Fuck Hungary !
TheRazvy98 5 months ago
Hiroshima Nuke and Bombing of Pearl Harbor?
cyndie26 5 months ago
@cyndie26 This is only the European front of WW2.
InterventionII 5 months ago
@MrSino94 doesn't matter...fuck turkey and all of them!!!!!!!!!!!!! CYPRUS IS CYPRUS..TURKEY IS TURKEY...i'll only accept if Cyprus is Greek but NOT CYPRUS IS TURKEY!!!!!!! FUCK
repanaki25 5 months ago
@repanaki25 shut up boy syprus 50%50 its end finish now peace
cengizsogutlu 5 months ago
@repanaki25 mad boy things dont change when you dont accept them
Hollwander 5 months ago
I AM GOING TO KILL SOMEONE!! Cyprus is not turkish!!! Why do you all think it is turkish land? Fuck them all of them. They occupy only 37% of our country those bastards and i dont want to see anyone else say we are turkish!! Cyprus is cypriot!!!!
repanaki25 6 months ago
greece ;pst at 1941 dam sure that is not the best ww2 simulation
corleone560 6 months ago
East Poland was invaded by U.S.S.R in 1939....
WhitePolishPatriot 6 months ago
gotta say, u zoomed in too much, we need to see more of africa and just a tiny bit more of russia
tbonesullivan1 6 months ago
I never understood why hitler decided to attack the soviet union that completely lost him the war.
rafelingd 6 months ago
@rafelingd he got cocky lol. like every human being.
ihusmal1234 2 months ago
FINALLY a simulation that shows the Greek efforts :D
This is what happens when you read books... Great great great simulations, congrats :)
Greekpeople1 6 months ago
so germany never took over macadonia ???
Norg1 6 months ago
Slavic peoples was always oppressed
neogeoo1 6 months ago
It's sad to see so many people dislike this video because they have there own way of how WW2 happened...
VulcanofWar 6 months ago
i want know the % of us soldiars in italy .
Djarzel 6 months ago
I hate it, in all WWs france lost and then they mean(after they got help of Britain, America and Russia from East) they could say what germany have to give them.
But i like the part at 0:46 where Germany won against france and britain at same time ;D
KaktusMovies 6 months ago
@KaktusMovies Hello? The French Republic was a victorious power in both World Wars. Germany was soundly defeated and the entire world was happy about it.
celloswiss 6 months ago
@celloswiss Im happy that we lost the WW 2 but france would be defeatet without Britain help and Invasion form East. And thats right but france would be defeatet!
KaktusMovies 6 months ago
@KaktusMovies
Germany didn't won against France in WWI and Germany was helped by the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Ottoman Empire.
MaxRWF 6 months ago
@MaxRWF Ok but Austria only concentrated on Serbia and the Ottoman were our ally but they didnt helped us much
KaktusMovies 6 months ago
@KaktusMovies France and England had to divide their forces in Africa and in the Balkans to fight the Ottoman Empire. Austria was a much more effective ally than the Russian Empire crippled by civil war.
MaxRWF 6 months ago
@MaxRWF France and BRITAIN not just "England" millions of Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish didn't die for your ignorance.
jonnygb4 6 months ago
@jonnygb4 I know that, but I don't give a fuck about Britain's official designation.
MaxRWF 6 months ago
@MaxRW for somebody who gives the impression of being intelligent, you have in just two comments shown your ignorance, your self righteousness and your total lack of respect for millions of people who gave their lives so you can speak freely today. and for all intents and purposes, Germany did beat France in WW1, and WW2, you have a lot to be grateful for, thanks to the actions of others. France's lack of Backbone and weak army in nearly all conflicts after Napoleon, has cost many inncoent lives
jonnygb4 6 months ago
@jonnygb4 The official name of France is "République française" and I don't get mad because you don't use it ... you're just ridiculous... Outside Britain, England and Britain are used as synonyms, just deal with it. A lack of backbone? Remember that the British never fought alone in any of the conflicts of their fucking entire history, that tells a lot... Except of course when it comes to civil wars or slaughtering primitive tribes, but that's an other story.
MaxRWF 6 months ago
@MaxRWF "the British never fought alone in any of the conflicts"-The Falklands. against the Argentinian army, an army using french made missiles. oh yeah we won, other largely victorious solo conflicts include The anglo-egpt war 1951-52, Anglo-turk, Gunboat war, Opium wars, Boer wars, Cod wars, Anglo-Burma, Anglo-Zanzibar among others, Hilariously the same cannot be said about France, no solo victories post '45, and very few before. "monsieur Hitler J'abandonne"! !!RULE BRITANNIA!!
jonnygb4 6 months ago
@jonnygb4 Haha, being proud to have won against Zanzibari tribesmen, that's so ridiculous. You're only citing wars against third world countries! Did England ever conquered a single civilized nation? No. In WWII England fled the battlefield at the first gunshot and just sat on its island waiting for American help. With allies like you, we don't need ennemies... Since Vietnam, France won all its conflicts, get your facts right moron. I keep saying England, cause Scotland will soon be independent.
MaxRWF 6 months ago
@MaxRWF Im scottish you stupid cunt. "tribesmen" how many tribes have artillery batteries and battleships? the Gunboat war was against Denmark, Cod wars agains Iceland, Turkish war against the ottomans, Egypt, china, German/dutch forces in the Boer wars, which one of them is 3rd world? im going to ignore your stupid WW2, and take is as complete irony that a Frenchman would accuse anyone else in the world of cowardice, You bastards have won no wars alone since WW2, you cant match Britains success
jonnygb4 6 months ago
@jonnygb4 African-Asian countries were no match for European tactics and weaponry, their "artillery" in the 19th century dates back to the 18 or 17th century. Wow England won against great Empires such as Iceland and Denmark, what a pride ! lol. England genocided the poor Boer civilian population ? What a succes ! Since 1945, France won in Algeria (1962), Congo (1978), Tchad (2005), Ivory Coast (2011), etc. So when did England conquered a civilized nation by itself? You still haven't answered...
MaxRWF 6 months ago
@MaxRWF the you have to be Joking, you say "African Asian countries were no match.." then boast about fighting Congo, However NEED I remind you that France was aided by Belgian forces in '78, acted as a Neutral force in the Ivory coast not a lone belligerent, and you in fact lost the Algerian war in '62 and to Answer your question--India, Egypt and Ireland, all had sizable forces, and before you try to be clever about India, remember that the french had an Indian empire, but ours was Bigger
jonnygb4 6 months ago
@jonnygb4 Each French military operation in the Algerian War was succesfull and are still studied in military academies.They gained independence via referendum. India didn't even exist in the 18th c. it was made of feudal states. The Egyptian army was corrupted and ill-equiped, most regiments still had muzzle-loading muskets and some other still wore medieval cuirasses. Ireland, an other big empire England conquered? By contrast, the French flag waved over Vienna, Berlin, Moscow, Madrid, Rome...
MaxRWF 6 months ago
@MaxRWF face it, The British had the best managed, biggest, and most famous empire in the world, France had Napoleon for a bit. nearly 400 years of international rule, vs about 80 in Europe. The reaches of the British Empire far outreach the pathetic attempts of anyone else, especially the French. Hence the fact you're speaking to me now in English, not in french. your arguments are flawed and you're living in a fantasy where people care about what a little frenchman did before he was carted off
jonnygb4 6 months ago
@jonnygb4 Sorry to break the bubble you live in, but I'm currently speaking US English. Who would have known that English failure to keep its 13 colonies would lead the USA to be a cultural superpower in the 20th c ? Even in England, kids speak a US pidgin, thanks to US cultural influence. The peak of the English empire only lasted between the end of the 19th c. and the beginning of the 20th c. The French Empire had a much more lasting impact (civil code, metric system, rights of men...).
MaxRWF 6 months ago
@MaxRWF Oh my god, you are so stupid. please give me examples of the Americanisms you have said to me, which are distinctively different to that of British English. other than that all of the shite you've been spouting is false and misplaced. Im not even going to answer your retarded claims about the so called legacy of the French. you're good for cheese and renaults.
jonnygb4 6 months ago