Well, you seem to be very well researched, however, I think you are missing the point; that it is about the NWO and it is about increasing control and implementing eugenics policies. It is about world government and a microchiped population. Problem, reaction, solution dude. You seem to disagree with what is going on however, the question that really needs to be asked is why?
Zack, this might be a stupid question, but, how many Americans are as capable of critical thinking as you? Are they smothered out by the main stream media, or are they just so indoctrinated. By the way, good vid, very lucid thoughts.
I think the quality of information they get is a big part of the problem for a lot of people. Even if you have a brain to think with, garbage in garbage out as they say.
Most people don't even have a good idea for what makes a good news source - i.e. a source is good to the extent that it's not beholden to others, or the difference between an industry think tank's position paper and peer reviewed science. BS has grown up - it's very sophisticated now.
Civilain surge sounds like a something put out there to bolster additional support for the Afghan War. You have to love the language they use to market this stuff.
Good to see you my friend. Things have been crazy busy or me lately and I feel out of the loop to some degree. I hope you and your family are doing well. ;-)
Good to hear from you - I hope things ease up at some point. I know you got a lot on your plate family wise. Maybe I can grab you on skype one night and get some details. Until then take care.
Zach, great video! Obama keeps on preaching "change, change, change" Well, as more people are waking up, I am sure we will see "revolutionary" change. in 2000, I thought 3rd party spoiled Gore. Now, I realized back then it was just a normal soap opera drama. we really need a 3rd party to undo all the corruption and favoritism inside our govt - all levels. Peace! KEEP UP the good work.
an endorsement from Cheney speaks volumes, no arguement there! great thoughful vid- you summed up alot of things we'd like to have seen different that hasn't yet turned out differently. maybe we've switched figure heads, but i still hope (maybe foolishly) that the underlying philosophy will eventually manefest itself to help more mid to low income people. thanks for such a wonderful response! peace
coffeedude65: what Zach is articulating here, and in a very amicable way, is what I've trying to say all along, although he says it better than I can. As I mentioned before in one of my previous vids, I think it was called Pragmatism versus Idealism, both approaches are needed to keep from going into extremes - but Obama is literally throwing his popular political capital into the dumpster by acquiesing again + again to the status quo.
Question: Despite your disappointments with Obama to date, do you think we're better off with him in the White House than we'd have been with McCain and Palin?
Z200a, that question doesn't have much to do with the topic, although I suspect things wouldn't be much different w/McC/Palin.
Obama was elected on his hope/change platform. He's done some 180's on lots of issues, except for bombing Pakistan.
It's disappointing that Obama didn't bring in people from outside DC, people who think outside the box to deal with the core of problems instead of glossing over everything with rhetoric and money.
I think the message of Obama is better, & that has helped us out around the world. I certainly don't think rhetoric is meaningless, it can have a lot of power. There have been sporadic small steps in the right direction - like the recent firing of the people who designed our torture program. I think McCain/Palin would've been fiercely unapologetic for Bush era torture, rather than Obama's trying to quietly sweep it under the rug. Both are bad, but Obama is slightly less so.
As far as the economy is concerned - I'm not sure McC/P would've responded any differently. McC showed himself to be a buttboy for bankers in S&L Debacle, no reason to expect he would be the cool head here.
Mostly, I regret my failure to vote 3rd party. That was an unqualified mistake, imho. Definately the last time I vote my fears.
The only thing that changes from one regime to the next is the rhetoric. Policy? No.
The last representative "we the people" had in the oval office was JFK, and we all know how that turned out.
I truly dread our future when I see the throngs of doe-eyed supporters at Obama's public appearances.... more like a Jonas Brothers concert than a political event.
This is basically my assessment as well. We've had some rather radical policies over the past 8 years, and they cannot be reversed overnight, but I see no fundamental differences in terms of our foreign policy, nor even domestically, except more conciliatory rhetoric for public consumption. I believe McCain/Palin would have been worse...but we are NOT making much progress....
Sadly, I must be at work in 16 mins so I don't have time to respond more fully, but thanks Zach for the response, and the other thoughtful comments.
I was just thinking about the Iran situation and how much worse it would be if McCain was in the WH right now. I agree with the thrust of the concerns expressed by you and others here, but as you say above, Republican government is truly radical and (IMO) dangerous. We must avoid electing another Republican until that party reforms.
Yeah, and it's giving people desperate for their Antichrist/Rapture something to scream about all at the same time. Not just polarization, but outright fear-mongering. The Chinese were right to consider their history cyclical rather than linear, because as far as the current situation goes I don't see anything new. Forget the NWO, it's been here for thousands of years and will always be in some form because people are stupid enough to buy into it, ESPECIALLY those who are desperate for it.
Well, you seem to be very well researched, however, I think you are missing the point; that it is about the NWO and it is about increasing control and implementing eugenics policies. It is about world government and a microchiped population. Problem, reaction, solution dude. You seem to disagree with what is going on however, the question that really needs to be asked is why?
RootsRadish 2 years ago
Zack, this might be a stupid question, but, how many Americans are as capable of critical thinking as you? Are they smothered out by the main stream media, or are they just so indoctrinated. By the way, good vid, very lucid thoughts.
bogesk 2 years ago
I think the quality of information they get is a big part of the problem for a lot of people. Even if you have a brain to think with, garbage in garbage out as they say.
Most people don't even have a good idea for what makes a good news source - i.e. a source is good to the extent that it's not beholden to others, or the difference between an industry think tank's position paper and peer reviewed science. BS has grown up - it's very sophisticated now.
FeelFreeToArgue 2 years ago
Obama is and always has been a Marxist. Review their work that's exactly what they are.
Edgrot 2 years ago 2
Civilain surge sounds like a something put out there to bolster additional support for the Afghan War. You have to love the language they use to market this stuff.
Good to see you my friend. Things have been crazy busy or me lately and I feel out of the loop to some degree. I hope you and your family are doing well. ;-)
mconn2112 2 years ago
Good to hear from you - I hope things ease up at some point. I know you got a lot on your plate family wise. Maybe I can grab you on skype one night and get some details. Until then take care.
FeelFreeToArgue 2 years ago
Absolutely man. I got your add. :-)
I will hit you up soon. As I mentioned in my update vid, I will have many late and slepless nights on my hands soon. LOL!
mconn2112 2 years ago
Zach, great video! Obama keeps on preaching "change, change, change" Well, as more people are waking up, I am sure we will see "revolutionary" change. in 2000, I thought 3rd party spoiled Gore. Now, I realized back then it was just a normal soap opera drama. we really need a 3rd party to undo all the corruption and favoritism inside our govt - all levels. Peace! KEEP UP the good work.
whong819 2 years ago
an endorsement from Cheney speaks volumes, no arguement there! great thoughful vid- you summed up alot of things we'd like to have seen different that hasn't yet turned out differently. maybe we've switched figure heads, but i still hope (maybe foolishly) that the underlying philosophy will eventually manefest itself to help more mid to low income people. thanks for such a wonderful response! peace
coffeedude65 2 years ago
coffeedude65: what Zach is articulating here, and in a very amicable way, is what I've trying to say all along, although he says it better than I can. As I mentioned before in one of my previous vids, I think it was called Pragmatism versus Idealism, both approaches are needed to keep from going into extremes - but Obama is literally throwing his popular political capital into the dumpster by acquiesing again + again to the status quo.
55ella2007k 2 years ago
Zach,
First of all, outstanding video.
Question: Despite your disappointments with Obama to date, do you think we're better off with him in the White House than we'd have been with McCain and Palin?
Z200a 2 years ago
Z200a, that question doesn't have much to do with the topic, although I suspect things wouldn't be much different w/McC/Palin.
Obama was elected on his hope/change platform. He's done some 180's on lots of issues, except for bombing Pakistan.
It's disappointing that Obama didn't bring in people from outside DC, people who think outside the box to deal with the core of problems instead of glossing over everything with rhetoric and money.
MiranUT 2 years ago
I think the message of Obama is better, & that has helped us out around the world. I certainly don't think rhetoric is meaningless, it can have a lot of power. There have been sporadic small steps in the right direction - like the recent firing of the people who designed our torture program. I think McCain/Palin would've been fiercely unapologetic for Bush era torture, rather than Obama's trying to quietly sweep it under the rug. Both are bad, but Obama is slightly less so.
FeelFreeToArgue 2 years ago
As far as the economy is concerned - I'm not sure McC/P would've responded any differently. McC showed himself to be a buttboy for bankers in S&L Debacle, no reason to expect he would be the cool head here.
Mostly, I regret my failure to vote 3rd party. That was an unqualified mistake, imho. Definately the last time I vote my fears.
FeelFreeToArgue 2 years ago
"Definately the last time I vote my fears. "
Thank you for that, friend!
The only thing that changes from one regime to the next is the rhetoric. Policy? No.
The last representative "we the people" had in the oval office was JFK, and we all know how that turned out.
I truly dread our future when I see the throngs of doe-eyed supporters at Obama's public appearances.... more like a Jonas Brothers concert than a political event.
Peace!...and out.
wetalmorker 2 years ago 3
This is basically my assessment as well. We've had some rather radical policies over the past 8 years, and they cannot be reversed overnight, but I see no fundamental differences in terms of our foreign policy, nor even domestically, except more conciliatory rhetoric for public consumption. I believe McCain/Palin would have been worse...but we are NOT making much progress....
55ella2007k 2 years ago
Sadly, I must be at work in 16 mins so I don't have time to respond more fully, but thanks Zach for the response, and the other thoughtful comments.
I was just thinking about the Iran situation and how much worse it would be if McCain was in the WH right now. I agree with the thrust of the concerns expressed by you and others here, but as you say above, Republican government is truly radical and (IMO) dangerous. We must avoid electing another Republican until that party reforms.
Z200a 2 years ago
under obama and his "team" we are headed into a marxist style goverment if they can get-away with it...!
yedon68 2 years ago 3
Yeah, and it's giving people desperate for their Antichrist/Rapture something to scream about all at the same time. Not just polarization, but outright fear-mongering. The Chinese were right to consider their history cyclical rather than linear, because as far as the current situation goes I don't see anything new. Forget the NWO, it's been here for thousands of years and will always be in some form because people are stupid enough to buy into it, ESPECIALLY those who are desperate for it.
Homer177 2 years ago
people are more into following ideologies than reality.left-right paradigm, government control, etc.
LouieArrighi 2 years ago