Inside job my ass there were no explosive devices found, no time to set the explosives except by pure wild speculation, and science alone explained the fall already. DEMOLITIONS MAKE NOISE!! lots more noise than the towers.........What more do idiot truthers want.........
I bet 90% of truthers aren't qualified to debate a 1st year structural engineer or chemist. Tsk tsk........
LMAO! did you just say many engineers and PHYSICIANS question the official story? How long is this bullshit gonna last. There are 1500 prominent people in AE9/11, only 1500. And of them, approximately 11 are qualified structural engineers. Physicians study medicine, not physics. How do the laws of physics contradict the official story? If anything, the laws of physics fit quite well. Now how the hell does a demolition get set up so fast and fall so QUIETLY? explain...
@AceofDlamonds Devices? NIST DIDN'T test for explosives conveniently, which seems pretty strange considering the circumstances, Nano-thermite (a developing military technology) is a high tech relatively silent incendiary which produces molten iron as a by-product (see the multiple accounts of huge pools of molten metal present in the clear up for MONTHS afterwards)
How convenient; same arguments spouted for 5 years.
"nano-thermite" is the result of Jones et al's fantasy "thermite" samples. There are loads of other compounds that could be attributed to different materials. Harrit et al didn't take this into consideration. The paper tried to squeeze everything that Jones and Harrit wanted into a little corner. No wonder it doesn't stand against scrutiny. My professor even once used it as an example of how NOT to write a scientific paper.
Collapse? It just gets ripped in zillions of piecies, this is not how collapses happen, look how big area was covered with debrie, it was blown out. Squibs, sections of steel frames ejections have been clocked and some of them reaching 60mph.
if you watch from 11-13 you can clearl as day see a puff of smoke a good 15 stories below where the building was "pancaking" you think people are stupid and waste their times with "conspiracy theories" yet no questions are ever answered questioning the bush administrations offical story. why did building 7 collapse? have any logical or scientific answer for that one? because buildings 3 4 5 and 6 survived the collapse, and they were directly beneath it. dont stop looking for the truth
If you "Truthers" spent as much time on addressing your acne and developing social skills, you wouldn't be chasing some alternate reality in order to get noticed.
Debunked? What was debunked? So planes can vaporize on impact and buildings can crumble to dust from jetfuel and 19 people can hijack 4 planes on 1 day without and hit the most protected country in the world and then stay unpunished hiding in some mountains in foreign coutnries without being caught for 9 years and those supposed cavemen can put tons of thermate in buildings like the wtc?
Wow, that makes perfect sense now, thanks it feels good to believe a theory that makes perfect sense.
Are you seriously going to use the term "vaporize" when planes impacted the buildings? Fragments of the liners flew out the other end some of which has landed on the floor. But if you like, I can debunk each theory with you using facts and science. You do realize that this wasnt the first terrorist attack on U.S. soil.
No, what was shocking about 9/11 was the fact that two of the Worlds tallest buildings, had been Assaulted by Planes, people watched in horrid, of other people jumping out, to not suffer a Worse death, then what was coming to them, People watched this repeat, as a 2nd plane smacked into the other building on INTERNATIONAL television. People watched in horror, as a damaged towers, tumbled down in less than 10-12 seconds each. And the world could do nothing. I would be alittle bit stoned.....yep.
Oh, if you think suicide bombers/crashers are a thing of fiction, you're wrong. Osama Bin Laden is worth over 200 mil. Calling these people cavemen is pretty sad. You under estimate them greatly. To fund the suicide attackers wouldnt be much because all they need is a fake pass port, and flying lessons.
FYI, on thanks giving i spoke to a man who likes 5 blacks from the white house. he was driving on the highway on 9/11 and seen a PLANE fly into the pentagon. i specifically asked him if he seen a missile. He told me it was a plane. He noted he seen the wings, tailplane and engines. then it went into the pentagon and there was a huge fireball. It was moving extremely fast he told me. so sorry-it was an aircraft. The guy who told me this is a democrat-just like you.
Of course the USA government knew of an attack beforehand and needed it to get the people onside for an un necessary war to control the supply of Oil, but just didnt know how bad it was going to be, that is all. Then they felt somewhat impotent afterwards, and decided to allow these silly conspiracy stories to profligate to try to capture some sort of control over it. Your government did it etc. Makes you feel safer! crikey - hat a worrying world.
@AidanMusik It has been debunked. Problem is people who believe the inside job theory would have to remove physics and science to make their theory work.
"It". There is no it. There is more than one theory as to what really happened on that day. Don't sit behind your computer screen & tell me bullshit. I'm not a hardcore truther but I'm intelligent enough to realise that there's a lot we weren't told about in terms of what happened on that day, and the events that supposedly took place in the name of 9/11.
The fact is that I don't know. That's the difference between me & you. I don't particularly believe in absolutes, especially with a situation like that. Just answer this, you think you went to war in Iraq because of 9/11?
@AidanMusik The Bush administration ceased the opportunity of the tragedy. Bush figured the invasion of Iraq would help his cause because back in 96' the U.N. wanted the Clinton administration to invade Iraq. Why? Because Iraq kept denying the UNSCOM entry to inspect for chemical weapons. Problem was that the Bush administration was relying on old information. That's why they thought there was "weapons of mass destruction."
I'm not going to debate with you. Your eyes are closed and you've got your fingers in your ears. That's figuratively speaking btw, but then again you'll probably tell me that your eyes are open and your fingers aren't anywhere near your ears.
@AidanMusik I'd figure you'd respond in that way because you're just going by feelings. I use facts, not feelings to explain what has happened. Ignoring physics doesn't make the facts go away.
@AidanMusik For example, the collapse on both towers started from the point of impact. There was no explosion or anything like that but there is close up video where you see the building give way. You'll see the force of air pushing outward of the building where people think it was bombs going off, which it was not. There were no explosions or flashes. Just rumbling and crashing.
@AidanMusik Well here's my question to you, why even argue the pro/against inside job theory while you apparently didn't even do the research on either side? Just saying it's an inside job doesn't make it so.
@AidanMusik Obviously you don't. That's why you avoid debating because you have no facts to back up your belief. You said so yourself. "I don't know".
Even if I didn't, Mr Retard, I could just easily get them off google. But I choose not to argue with a bigot over the internet. Now fuck off home son I'm having a wank.
@AidanMusik LOL a bigot? Well if you know nothing about the subject matter then you have no place to make a comment on anything. You successfully made yourself look like an idiot.
You just prove yourself wrong by stating I know nothing without even knowing me? It's like if someone refuses to argue with you, they know nothing. Bigot, if I ever raped one.
@AidanMusik LOL back tracking on your own statement already. Did you or did you not say "The fact is I don't know". It's your statement. I'm quoting you buddy.
@AidanMusik You're just an idiot, plain and simple. Leave this subject matter since you know nothing of it. Go listen to your music and play with your little friends considering you have nothing to add.
@AidanMusik It's hilarious that you call me a bigot. When it comes to 9/11, there's no room for opinions or fantasy world theories. I find it sad though that you enjoy having fun on a tragedy you find humorous.
@AidanMusik Now that I think about it, I'm guessing your the type of guy that makes fun of tragedy just to start a fight. It could be 9/11, the England bus bombing, the train bombs in Spain. It doesn't matter for you so as long human tragedy is there for your enjoyment.
@AidanMusik Well here's the thing. When you call me out on something, which you did from the beginning, you expect me not to respond? If you do that you have to have a legit reason to do so.
@godzilla1077 I am completely on your side of the conspiracies, but I need your opinion on one thing. After looking through your argument with that gentleman, you seemed to be a smart guy. But how do you explain the flashes in the towers? Could they have bin lights? I would like to hear your opinion. Sorry for asking this so late from your original comments.
@DKaijuGomoMan Not a problem. The electricity and gas that is left in the building explode when ruptured. Can you have explosions without bombs during a fire? Sure, there have been plenty of times where fire cause eletricity to burst into a large fire ball and huge loud explosions. The difference between that and ballistic explosives is the shockwaves that is caused by ballistic explosions. Survivors near the WTC's that were in vicinity of these explosions would have suffered ballistic injuries.
@DKaijuGomoMan WTC 7 was damaged at the south end when the north tower collapsed on it. It lost 20 stories near the base line as reported by NYFDs Chris Boyle and several others. It took a total of 18 seconds considering the Penthouse was the first to collapse from the southend. The ABC video shows the whole gradual fall to sudden collapse of 7. It also didn't fall on it's own footprint considering it fell in front of the footsteps of the Verizon building.
@godzilla1077 18 seconds,,,,,get the fuck outta here you moron,,,,,you can see the wave rip through the hole building blowing out windows and smoke coming out of those windows on the way down,,,,,,,collapses don't work like that son,,,,,,,,building 7 was a fortress built solid,,,,,,,,ain't no freefall collapse in this building chico,,,,better get the fuck off the pipe if your lookin at building 7 coming down and saying,,,,,,oh yeah, that's just a gravity driven free fall collapse,,,get real
@bigbopper993 Funny considering in every demo ever recorded you can hear the bombs go off a mile away. The cameras were closer than a mile and you can't even hear bombs in any of the WTC 7 collapse videos. You just hear it rumble which is big difference from bombs going off. There's a reason why the truth movement always have the famous collapse with no audio. By the way, when the building collapsed, youre not expecting it to fall as whole structure are you?
@godzilla1077 funny considering,,,,,,,,,you actually believe that the military would use an old fasioned typical demolition style,,,,,,,do you understand that the military technology is about 30 years ahead of anything we would even dream of,,,,,,,,you don't think they can take a building out quietly,,,,,,,,you don't think they have a million ways to decieve the public?,,,,,,,,you don't think they would stage a false flag,,,,,,,covert attack on it's own people to gain public support for the war?
@bigbopper993 It's obvious you don't understand ballistics nor do you understand the nature of explosions created by ballistic devices. And don't even bring up Operation Northwoods if you're talking about false flag attacks. O.N. is supposed to be simulated with NO REAL CAUSALTIES. Not to mention Operation Northwoods was laughed out of the room when it was brought up. It never came to fruition.
@godzilla1077 You gotta be fucking kidding me you ridiculous fuckstick idiot,,,,,are you mental in the fucking head or just plain fucking stupid,,,,give your head a shake,,,,,,smarten up about 65% and file the point off of your fucking head you moron,,,,,,9/11 was a phsychological attack on the American people,,,,,,,pulled off with military percision,,,,but anyone that works with concrete and steel every day,,,,,,such as myself,,,,,can easily understand that the story we were told is impossible!
@bigbopper993 It's funny how you offer no specifcs on the whys and why nots since you said you work with steel and concrete. You don't understand explosions from regular fires, ballistic explosions or how it effects structures or people. There's a lot of things you fail to understand. You were shamed by the truth movement.
@bigbopper993 Dude stop it. The towers were flawed. The achitect even says so himself. The floors were held in by thin framework and that melted in the fire. Eventually causing the floors to pancake in on each other and the weight of a falling floor is too much for the one below it. So on and so forth. Without the floors the collums have no support structure at all and bow outward and fail under the immense weight. Once started it cant be stopped. Resulting in collapse. WTC7 IDK about though.
@xcited4vids actually correct watch a vid of the second tower falling... You'll see a couple collumns still standing above the blowing cloud of dust for a few seconds before they buckle in half and fall. Point proven. The collumns proved for themselves in plain sight they couldn't stand on their own.. So yea
@xcited4vids Here have a link... Watch at 1:37 and a few other places you can see it happened at both towers. Collumns remain standing a few seconds longer than the walls.
@godzilla1077 so for the first time ever, a skyscraper collapsed from fire.... 3x in the same day.... yu dont think that even a tiny bit suspect? Any why do you take their word for it??? you need to see the motive and read into what our "leader's" real goals were. then it becomes clear. its bigger than this one event.
@grimm61111 You do realize they didn't collpase from fire alone. You have blunt force trauma hitting both structures when the planes hit. Now you can add the large explosion that followed. Add a steady fire and you have a collpase. WTC 7 was severely damaged when the north tower fell on it, so it didn't catch on fire on its own either.
@godzilla1077 freefall speed you moron.... you really think a solid object can just crumble like that? its made of solid steel. Solid steel. You're saying the steel shattered??? ahahahahahahah
@grimm61111 You do realize that none of the WTC's fell at free fall speed. Even the truth movement has moved away from saying that since it's been disproven years ago. Where in any of my statements did I say that steel shattered? Last I checked, structures are not made of solid steel but steel components along with other materials peiced together to make one whole object. Are you reffering that the WTC's was made up entirely of solid steel? Please read carefully before responding.
inside job believers are the result of handjobs
MoltenMozzarella 5 months ago
Inside job my ass there were no explosive devices found, no time to set the explosives except by pure wild speculation, and science alone explained the fall already. DEMOLITIONS MAKE NOISE!! lots more noise than the towers.........What more do idiot truthers want.........
I bet 90% of truthers aren't qualified to debate a 1st year structural engineer or chemist. Tsk tsk........
AceofDlamonds 5 months ago
@AceofDlamonds the laws of physics contradict the official story. science is on the conspiracy side.
many engineers and physicians question the official story anyway.
punishalltrolls 5 months ago
@punishalltrolls
LMAO! did you just say many engineers and PHYSICIANS question the official story? How long is this bullshit gonna last. There are 1500 prominent people in AE9/11, only 1500. And of them, approximately 11 are qualified structural engineers. Physicians study medicine, not physics. How do the laws of physics contradict the official story? If anything, the laws of physics fit quite well. Now how the hell does a demolition get set up so fast and fall so QUIETLY? explain...
AceofDlamonds 5 months ago
@AceofDlamonds Devices? NIST DIDN'T test for explosives conveniently, which seems pretty strange considering the circumstances, Nano-thermite (a developing military technology) is a high tech relatively silent incendiary which produces molten iron as a by-product (see the multiple accounts of huge pools of molten metal present in the clear up for MONTHS afterwards)
dirtydetox 2 months ago
@dirtydetox
How convenient; same arguments spouted for 5 years.
"nano-thermite" is the result of Jones et al's fantasy "thermite" samples. There are loads of other compounds that could be attributed to different materials. Harrit et al didn't take this into consideration. The paper tried to squeeze everything that Jones and Harrit wanted into a little corner. No wonder it doesn't stand against scrutiny. My professor even once used it as an example of how NOT to write a scientific paper.
AceofDlamonds 2 months ago
Collapse? It just gets ripped in zillions of piecies, this is not how collapses happen, look how big area was covered with debrie, it was blown out. Squibs, sections of steel frames ejections have been clocked and some of them reaching 60mph.
Matu1 6 months ago
thats amazing footage.
mischiefpwns 11 months ago
Wow, allmost ten years ago and you people are still placing your ridiciolus theories on youtube...well guess I´ll see you in 2021 =P
TheRStard 1 year ago
0:11 ......
koleinz 1 year ago
I can't belive that someone would do things like that.. :(
ih8iayzeei 1 year ago
Inside job? Take another hit off that crack pipe, moron.
1958Antimatter 1 year ago
inside job !!!
BernaLonga 1 year ago
if you watch from 11-13 you can clearl as day see a puff of smoke a good 15 stories below where the building was "pancaking" you think people are stupid and waste their times with "conspiracy theories" yet no questions are ever answered questioning the bush administrations offical story. why did building 7 collapse? have any logical or scientific answer for that one? because buildings 3 4 5 and 6 survived the collapse, and they were directly beneath it. dont stop looking for the truth
maoconno5435 1 year ago
If you "Truthers" spent as much time on addressing your acne and developing social skills, you wouldn't be chasing some alternate reality in order to get noticed.
Sundogjeep 2 years ago
that's scary. i'd be running as fast as i can (even if i can barely hold out a sprint) it's just so big, scary, ominous, and deadly!
iSpeed09 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was a inside job!
TheDoctaFoo1 2 years ago
why has it taken so long to rebuild i was there on a holiday from australia in 2009 july
spoty212 2 years ago
911 was an inside JOB
fema is responsable
norad
cia
us air force
nikoandsam 2 years ago
Is this Liberty Street??
usertrt 2 years ago
Church Street
Jordan8414 2 years ago
9/11 was an inside job
that`s my mind...
F****** Bush
hoi7423 2 years ago
Not an inside job, fucking twat.
godzilla1077 2 years ago
get back with the cattle you sheep
how could you be so blind?
Dopey416 2 years ago
How can you be so blatantly stupid? These "theories" you guys love come from individuals who had been disgraced before these events even happened.
godzilla1077 2 years ago
if that were true my friend, it doesnt mean you have to label it false without any questions
Dopey416 2 years ago
Retard ppl like you make me lose faith in humanity.
Xendrius 2 years ago
You do realize all the inside job theory was debunked years ago. Sorry to have burst your little fantasy world.
godzilla1077 2 years ago 28
Debunked? What was debunked? So planes can vaporize on impact and buildings can crumble to dust from jetfuel and 19 people can hijack 4 planes on 1 day without and hit the most protected country in the world and then stay unpunished hiding in some mountains in foreign coutnries without being caught for 9 years and those supposed cavemen can put tons of thermate in buildings like the wtc?
Wow, that makes perfect sense now, thanks it feels good to believe a theory that makes perfect sense.
Xendrius 2 years ago
Are you seriously going to use the term "vaporize" when planes impacted the buildings? Fragments of the liners flew out the other end some of which has landed on the floor. But if you like, I can debunk each theory with you using facts and science. You do realize that this wasnt the first terrorist attack on U.S. soil.
godzilla1077 2 years ago 4
No, what was shocking about 9/11 was the fact that two of the Worlds tallest buildings, had been Assaulted by Planes, people watched in horrid, of other people jumping out, to not suffer a Worse death, then what was coming to them, People watched this repeat, as a 2nd plane smacked into the other building on INTERNATIONAL television. People watched in horror, as a damaged towers, tumbled down in less than 10-12 seconds each. And the world could do nothing. I would be alittle bit stoned.....yep.
TheRStard 3 months ago 2
Oh, if you think suicide bombers/crashers are a thing of fiction, you're wrong. Osama Bin Laden is worth over 200 mil. Calling these people cavemen is pretty sad. You under estimate them greatly. To fund the suicide attackers wouldnt be much because all they need is a fake pass port, and flying lessons.
godzilla1077 2 years ago
FYI, on thanks giving i spoke to a man who likes 5 blacks from the white house. he was driving on the highway on 9/11 and seen a PLANE fly into the pentagon. i specifically asked him if he seen a missile. He told me it was a plane. He noted he seen the wings, tailplane and engines. then it went into the pentagon and there was a huge fireball. It was moving extremely fast he told me. so sorry-it was an aircraft. The guy who told me this is a democrat-just like you.
squat625 2 years ago
I am unsure if you are being serious or not.
Of course the USA government knew of an attack beforehand and needed it to get the people onside for an un necessary war to control the supply of Oil, but just didnt know how bad it was going to be, that is all. Then they felt somewhat impotent afterwards, and decided to allow these silly conspiracy stories to profligate to try to capture some sort of control over it. Your government did it etc. Makes you feel safer! crikey - hat a worrying world.
themadmanc 2 years ago
@themadmanc
i play you for the deaths. jkk im kiddig
Codyrocks0510 1 year ago
Dude, just watch the vid on my channel called "9/11 attacks, how they did it" explains it step by step.
Xendrius 2 years ago
Watched it. It's nothing new from I've read and seen.
godzilla1077 2 years ago
@godzilla1077
it was debunked years ago? You're a tard
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik It has been debunked. Problem is people who believe the inside job theory would have to remove physics and science to make their theory work.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
"It". There is no it. There is more than one theory as to what really happened on that day. Don't sit behind your computer screen & tell me bullshit. I'm not a hardcore truther but I'm intelligent enough to realise that there's a lot we weren't told about in terms of what happened on that day, and the events that supposedly took place in the name of 9/11.
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik Really? So you believe that it was a preset demolition for example?
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
The fact is that I don't know. That's the difference between me & you. I don't particularly believe in absolutes, especially with a situation like that. Just answer this, you think you went to war in Iraq because of 9/11?
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik The Bush administration ceased the opportunity of the tragedy. Bush figured the invasion of Iraq would help his cause because back in 96' the U.N. wanted the Clinton administration to invade Iraq. Why? Because Iraq kept denying the UNSCOM entry to inspect for chemical weapons. Problem was that the Bush administration was relying on old information. That's why they thought there was "weapons of mass destruction."
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@AidanMusik Here's one thing that is truly absolute, bombs were not used to bring any of the Towers down, especially 7.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
I'm not going to debate with you. Your eyes are closed and you've got your fingers in your ears. That's figuratively speaking btw, but then again you'll probably tell me that your eyes are open and your fingers aren't anywhere near your ears.
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik I'd figure you'd respond in that way because you're just going by feelings. I use facts, not feelings to explain what has happened. Ignoring physics doesn't make the facts go away.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
You "figured" huh?
& I've already stated that I'm no hardcore truther? I just don't believe EVERY GOD DAMNED THING. "I use facts". Haven't heard one so far.
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik For example, the collapse on both towers started from the point of impact. There was no explosion or anything like that but there is close up video where you see the building give way. You'll see the force of air pushing outward of the building where people think it was bombs going off, which it was not. There were no explosions or flashes. Just rumbling and crashing.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
Oh yeah, good hard evidence. :/
Stating of the obvious.
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik Well here's my question to you, why even argue the pro/against inside job theory while you apparently didn't even do the research on either side? Just saying it's an inside job doesn't make it so.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
I do know. But everything won't be listened to. So, fuck, off.
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik Obviously you don't. That's why you avoid debating because you have no facts to back up your belief. You said so yourself. "I don't know".
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
Even if I didn't, Mr Retard, I could just easily get them off google. But I choose not to argue with a bigot over the internet. Now fuck off home son I'm having a wank.
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik LOL a bigot? Well if you know nothing about the subject matter then you have no place to make a comment on anything. You successfully made yourself look like an idiot.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
You just prove yourself wrong by stating I know nothing without even knowing me? It's like if someone refuses to argue with you, they know nothing. Bigot, if I ever raped one.
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik LOL back tracking on your own statement already. Did you or did you not say "The fact is I don't know". It's your statement. I'm quoting you buddy.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
I don't know... as in I'm not 100% sure like you. Ie, I'm not a bigot
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik You're just an idiot, plain and simple. Leave this subject matter since you know nothing of it. Go listen to your music and play with your little friends considering you have nothing to add.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
xD you're so intense ;)
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik Not really. It's just in all honesty you have nothing to add.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
Jesus you really love an argument don't you?
I love how when I refuse you have a bigotgasm...
make me wet
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik It's hilarious that you call me a bigot. When it comes to 9/11, there's no room for opinions or fantasy world theories. I find it sad though that you enjoy having fun on a tragedy you find humorous.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@AidanMusik Now that I think about it, I'm guessing your the type of guy that makes fun of tragedy just to start a fight. It could be 9/11, the England bus bombing, the train bombs in Spain. It doesn't matter for you so as long human tragedy is there for your enjoyment.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@godzilla1077
England bus bombing? You know fuck all about that. I was in London on that day so don't be telling me I make fun of it. Fucking fool.
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
England bus bombing? I was in London that day, so don't be telling me I make fun of it. Fucking fool
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik Really. Seems to me your getting your jollies with 9/11, why would the England bus bomb be any different to you?
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
I'm not getting "jollies". That's called you trying to get one over on me. Now seriously go away
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@AidanMusik Well here's the thing. When you call me out on something, which you did from the beginning, you expect me not to respond? If you do that you have to have a legit reason to do so.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@godzilla1077
ok
AidanMusik 1 year ago
@godzilla1077 I am completely on your side of the conspiracies, but I need your opinion on one thing. After looking through your argument with that gentleman, you seemed to be a smart guy. But how do you explain the flashes in the towers? Could they have bin lights? I would like to hear your opinion. Sorry for asking this so late from your original comments.
DKaijuGomoMan 7 months ago
@DKaijuGomoMan Not a problem. The electricity and gas that is left in the building explode when ruptured. Can you have explosions without bombs during a fire? Sure, there have been plenty of times where fire cause eletricity to burst into a large fire ball and huge loud explosions. The difference between that and ballistic explosives is the shockwaves that is caused by ballistic explosions. Survivors near the WTC's that were in vicinity of these explosions would have suffered ballistic injuries.
godzilla1077 7 months ago
@godzilla1077 Ahh... Thank you very much :)
Another thing... How would you explain WTC 7's collapse and why it was so quick?
I'm sorry for nagging to you so much I am just in an argument with this moron and I need to shut him up XD
DKaijuGomoMan 7 months ago
@DKaijuGomoMan WTC 7 was damaged at the south end when the north tower collapsed on it. It lost 20 stories near the base line as reported by NYFDs Chris Boyle and several others. It took a total of 18 seconds considering the Penthouse was the first to collapse from the southend. The ABC video shows the whole gradual fall to sudden collapse of 7. It also didn't fall on it's own footprint considering it fell in front of the footsteps of the Verizon building.
godzilla1077 7 months ago
@godzilla1077 18 seconds,,,,,get the fuck outta here you moron,,,,,you can see the wave rip through the hole building blowing out windows and smoke coming out of those windows on the way down,,,,,,,collapses don't work like that son,,,,,,,,building 7 was a fortress built solid,,,,,,,,ain't no freefall collapse in this building chico,,,,better get the fuck off the pipe if your lookin at building 7 coming down and saying,,,,,,oh yeah, that's just a gravity driven free fall collapse,,,get real
bigbopper993 6 months ago
@bigbopper993 Funny considering in every demo ever recorded you can hear the bombs go off a mile away. The cameras were closer than a mile and you can't even hear bombs in any of the WTC 7 collapse videos. You just hear it rumble which is big difference from bombs going off. There's a reason why the truth movement always have the famous collapse with no audio. By the way, when the building collapsed, youre not expecting it to fall as whole structure are you?
godzilla1077 6 months ago
@godzilla1077 funny considering,,,,,,,,,you actually believe that the military would use an old fasioned typical demolition style,,,,,,,do you understand that the military technology is about 30 years ahead of anything we would even dream of,,,,,,,,you don't think they can take a building out quietly,,,,,,,,you don't think they have a million ways to decieve the public?,,,,,,,,you don't think they would stage a false flag,,,,,,,covert attack on it's own people to gain public support for the war?
bigbopper993 6 months ago
@bigbopper993 It's obvious you don't understand ballistics nor do you understand the nature of explosions created by ballistic devices. And don't even bring up Operation Northwoods if you're talking about false flag attacks. O.N. is supposed to be simulated with NO REAL CAUSALTIES. Not to mention Operation Northwoods was laughed out of the room when it was brought up. It never came to fruition.
godzilla1077 6 months ago
@godzilla1077 You gotta be fucking kidding me you ridiculous fuckstick idiot,,,,,are you mental in the fucking head or just plain fucking stupid,,,,give your head a shake,,,,,,smarten up about 65% and file the point off of your fucking head you moron,,,,,,9/11 was a phsychological attack on the American people,,,,,,,pulled off with military percision,,,,but anyone that works with concrete and steel every day,,,,,,such as myself,,,,,can easily understand that the story we were told is impossible!
bigbopper993 6 months ago
@bigbopper993 It's funny how you offer no specifcs on the whys and why nots since you said you work with steel and concrete. You don't understand explosions from regular fires, ballistic explosions or how it effects structures or people. There's a lot of things you fail to understand. You were shamed by the truth movement.
godzilla1077 5 months ago
@bigbopper993 Dude stop it. The towers were flawed. The achitect even says so himself. The floors were held in by thin framework and that melted in the fire. Eventually causing the floors to pancake in on each other and the weight of a falling floor is too much for the one below it. So on and so forth. Without the floors the collums have no support structure at all and bow outward and fail under the immense weight. Once started it cant be stopped. Resulting in collapse. WTC7 IDK about though.
rsmithdrift 5 months ago
@rsmithdrift "Without the floors the collums have no support structure at all" Wrong wrong wrong!!!! The central columns could stand on their own!!!
xcited4vids 5 months ago
@xcited4vids actually correct watch a vid of the second tower falling... You'll see a couple collumns still standing above the blowing cloud of dust for a few seconds before they buckle in half and fall. Point proven. The collumns proved for themselves in plain sight they couldn't stand on their own.. So yea
rsmithdrift 5 months ago
@xcited4vids Here have a link... Watch at 1:37 and a few other places you can see it happened at both towers. Collumns remain standing a few seconds longer than the walls.
/watch?v=0TqqzOCPmRE&feature=related
rsmithdrift 5 months ago
@godzilla1077 so for the first time ever, a skyscraper collapsed from fire.... 3x in the same day.... yu dont think that even a tiny bit suspect? Any why do you take their word for it??? you need to see the motive and read into what our "leader's" real goals were. then it becomes clear. its bigger than this one event.
grimm61111 6 months ago
@grimm61111 You do realize they didn't collpase from fire alone. You have blunt force trauma hitting both structures when the planes hit. Now you can add the large explosion that followed. Add a steady fire and you have a collpase. WTC 7 was severely damaged when the north tower fell on it, so it didn't catch on fire on its own either.
godzilla1077 6 months ago
@godzilla1077 freefall speed you moron.... you really think a solid object can just crumble like that? its made of solid steel. Solid steel. You're saying the steel shattered??? ahahahahahahah
grimm61111 5 months ago
@grimm61111 You do realize that none of the WTC's fell at free fall speed. Even the truth movement has moved away from saying that since it's been disproven years ago. Where in any of my statements did I say that steel shattered? Last I checked, structures are not made of solid steel but steel components along with other materials peiced together to make one whole object. Are you reffering that the WTC's was made up entirely of solid steel? Please read carefully before responding.
godzilla1077 5 months ago
@godzilla1077 debunked by whom? MANY inside job theories. that's plural.
punishalltrolls 5 months ago
explosif
truth now
nikoandsam 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No inside job you fucking nut.
godzilla1077 2 years ago
Sad day.
iRockBoXers 3 years ago 16