@StentorATX if you want to talk about evidence from tribes and nations reporting events in the far past, then I hope you also accept the reports from throughout history about ancient aliens, otherwise your arguments are no good either. Somehow I doubt you will accept those.
Dead things come to life ALL THROUGHOUT the Bible, not only that BUT he doesn't believe life could have evolved from a single cell, YET he believes all human life came from Adam and Eve? and he also believes ALL the animals of the world were saved in a giant boat by Noah? Yeah OK guy! This guy is lacking in basic biology and elementary science knowledge. *rollseyes* This guy is an idiot, I hope no one takes what he says seriously.
@TheSinisterdreams Man can engineer molecules! It shows how it takes INTELLIGENCE in controlled laboratory conditions to mimic, manipulate, plagiarize a cell's Design! Scientists COPY genetic sequences!! They dont create anything!!
Its all Man made Synthetic chemistry! and it has nothing to do with the origin of life!!!! Wake up atheist MORONS! Homochirality is a disaster for any sort of naturalistic origins!
@TheSinisterdreams excuse me sir, but you actually sound like one. You contradict yourself in your first run-on sentence. Evolutionary theory is lacking in basic biology and elementary science knowledge. I don't understand why you find it hard to believe all human life came from Adam and Eve, especially considering you seem to acknowledge belief in the Bible in your first sentence (good choice), and that modern Eve theories clearly point to a single common human mother.
@TheSinisterdreams Now, the Ark is harder for our feeble filtering brain to comprehend, however if you take what you say seriously I hope you will actually put forth a smidgen of effort to study the stories from all tribes and nations on earth about a global flood that killed the human population except one family. Seriously now, we find seashells on top of mountains all over earth. Let's be objective here and not roll our eyes at our ridiculous assumptions.
Oh look, another creationist that doesn't know what he's talking about. There's a reason nobody asks dentists for their opinions on evolutionary biology. Why is this guy being treated as an expert when it is obvious to a scientific amateur that he never understood the theory to begin with.
@Antimoronic You need to learn Racemic mixtures! That's all man and nature can produce you need to take some Biochemistry classes! and even if all LEFT handed amino acids are present there is nothing that is going to assemble them! Everything is leading towards breaking down not becoming more complex!! Also learn the Law of Biogenesis!!!
@Antimoronic Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
@BelieveandtrustJesus But satan has killed fewer people than God :o He must be a nicer guy, I stick to satan I think :) Or maybe not 'cuz I'm an atheist, but still.
the best people to talk about about how to talk to evolutionists and atheists who have become creationists. they are the most knowledgable. they have been there and know what will get through to people and get them to understand.
Evolution was written to control the masses ! Life comes from Life. ALL physical life as far as we have seen MUST be seeded or passed on from the parent or donor that initially has it; it is not spontaneously generated. God, is the only true life for the day we were conceived and then later born we were subject to death.
@TheKatoom Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
BTW, folks, spontaneous generation was used prior to Pasteur to describe the idea that organisms that spoil food arose spontaneously from the food itself. Pasteur showed it was due to pre-existing contamination in 1862. This hopeless windbag is almost 150 years out of date, and an ignoramus to boot.
@thecoopersheldonphd Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
5tonyww has never studied anything relating to any branch of science. Homochirality is chemically determined and has nothing whatsoever to do with evolutional validity. Amino acids in proteins are left-handed, and amino acids in carbohydrates are right-handed because of their chemical composition (tony forgot to mention that). He is exceptionally dishonest. As for "dead" chemicals, as they have never been alive, there are no dead chemicals. Name a life form not made of elements tony!
@MegaMikss Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs! Atheists have faith this happened!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
spontaneous generation is a term of the past to mean the coming into existance of a fully functioning animal like mice, maggots etc. It was falsified by I think Lister in 1800s. abiogenesis however is being researched and some good progress is being made. Certainly eukaryotic cells were not the first life. We certainly dont know the answer yet but give it some time.
@helldamaged Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs! Atheists have faith this happened!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
@5tonyvvvv I would encourage you to research homochirality a little more. Yes it did and still does provide some challenges. "While the origin of the homochirality of amino acids and sugars has been a puzzling problem for decades, recent findings provide plausible explanations." This is quoted from Albrecht Moritz'sarticle "The Origin of Life" posted October 31, 2006. Good luck.
@helldamaged LOL. I have been studying Homochirality for the last 20 years! Its a disaster for atheists! But they will never admit it! As for resent experiments like jack szostak, all he does is borrow pre existing INFORMATION! and its all conducted in controlled laboratory conditions! They are the furthest thing from undirected natural processes! His experiments are not geochemical relevant reactions!
@helldamaged And even if you got all LEFT handed amino acids, how would nature assemble them?? Its impossible! I was an atheist for most of my life! I let go of the Indoctrination!
@SqueakerAlpha Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs! Atheists have faith this happened!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
@5tonyvvvv I am not qualified to dispute your claims. I will however continue to monitor the work being done on abiogenesis and see what they come up with. So far it seems they are making progress. regards
@5tonyvvvv ''50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate ''
Yes, and that is what happens in a test tube. Life does not happen in a test tube. All reactions are controlled by enzymes. The enzymes only recognize left handed molecules and so life just uses one enantiomer. No big deal.
@ 5tonyvvvv - I am okay with your assumption of intelligent design so long as 2 conditions are met. 1. That your assumption does not keep you from pursuing and recognizing a better explanation if one comes to your attention. And 2. That you don't teach your assumption to anyone without providing solid evidence for your conclusion. Moving on. Complexity does not equal design. I politely encourage you look up the Argument from Ignorance fallacy and/or the God of the Gaps fallacy. Understanding
sorry -continued to 5tonyvvvv - Understanding those can really help someone be more persuasive. As far as proteins coming from nothing check out Adenine. I think you will find it interesting. However, no one says that DNA or life came from nothing. Abiogenesis certainly does not say that, and evolution say nothing of how life started. Some has misinformed you. I encourage you to go research these topics for yourself. Don't take my word for it. Go look it up.
Continued again to 5tonyvvvv - Sorry for the order of the posts my phone is being weird. I think you are missing one fundamental difference in your comparison of life vs. some complex item. You used computers in your example. Others use a watch. That difference is that a defining feature of life is the ability to replicate oneself. Anyways, good luck. Have fun. Peace!
Evolution does not say something came from nothing. And most evolutionary scholars when asked, will give you the known theories we are working on or simply tell you I don't know. Cause thats the honest answer. Either way, its better than saying "God did it." 150 years of research resulting in major advances in medicine, technology and convience and you just want to throw it all out with crap like this.
@helldamaged Intelligence is needed to create software code or assemble a computer! FAR MORE intelligence is needed for the assemblance of the first Cell and thereby DNA. A DNA code is far more complex in design than All the Worlds Softwares COMBINED!! Therefore we can deduce Intelligent DESIGN! Homochirality and hydrolysis would prevent life from ever starting! It is chemically and mathematically impossible for a single protein to form!! Amino acids never assemble themselves!!
@5tonyvvvv ahhh sorry man. I just realized that my comments were not in reply to your post. Sorry. My phone is acting up. I just loaded some responses to your comment. I hope they pique your curiosity.
Please tell me this is satire. What this man is saying has nothing to do with evolution. Look up abiogenisis please. Evolution does not make unacknowleged assumptions. At the very least, if this is serious, go spend 5 min studying the scientific method. Please. I beg you. This video needs to reference peer reviewed articles and reveal who these supposed experts are he is talking about. I bet they can't do that. Propaganda.
@helldamaged You are right, abiogenesis is a separate discipline and evolution makes no assumptions about life origins. However, this means evolution is without a foundation. Since evolution's real objective is to get rid of God as an explanation of the natural world - and don't argue this point please - it fails in answering the most important piece of the evolutionary process, i.e., how it all started. If evolution - or abiogenesis for that matter - can't answer this, then it's a complete fail
@raponte1955 "this means evolution is without a foundation." I am sorry. I do not understand what is meant by this. Please explain how you support this statement. I do have to take issue with "Since evolution's real objective is to get rid of God as an explanation of the natural world." This is a misrepresentation, and I do not understand why I shouldn't argue "this point?" I have several text books here that disagree, and so far, I haven't found any of them saying get rid of God.
@helldamaged Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs! Atheists have faith this happened!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
@raponte1955 As far as abiogenisis. That fact it doesn't 100% explain the orgins of lfe yet does not make it a failure. This just means we need to do more research.
Try looking at the mud skipper. Works better than the celocanth because it is the only fish that can live both in water, and on land. Really think about all the brain washing evolution has done for you.
Evolution states that one animal the celocanth became every living thing on the face of the earth, and evolved from an ameba. The ameba is still alive, and the celocanth was said to be extinct millions of years ago. Guess what? it was discovered in the 1930's and is still being found alive all over the world. Exactly as in the fossil record. Evolution says that if the animal evolved into other things, than the previous form should be wiped out. that hasn't happened. Evolution is wrong there.
If evolution did happen why are there at least two different sub-species of the same animal? Like gorillas, elephants, apes, etc. if evolution happened there should be only one version of each animal. One elephant, one crocodile, one rhino, and so fourth. We see multiple which proves adaptation. Which is completely different from evolution. Adaptation states that the first giraffe became the two modern giraffes we have today (the Masai, and reticulated). As well as with the other animals.
Have you looked at evolution? Evolution states that one fish branched into everything, where are all the missing links from the fish to the modern animals? Not in the fossil record (which only proves those animals lived at one point in time period). Next no cells in the entire world have the instructions for being alive. (which means they should be dead.I guess in the next million or so years, your pepsi can will begin to live and multiply on it's own.
@gregrutz you'r the obvious stupid asshole here, calling all those who don't see things exactly eye-to-eye with you, as assholes, is only proving what a dumb stupid idiot you really are. YES Evolution is total BULLSHIT.
I get so annoyed when I hear atheism referred to as religion. Nothing could be farther than the truth. Atheists do not believe in a supernatural creator, how is that religion?
Religion has pre-mandated doctrine usually in the form of some "holy" text (bible). Religioins encourage fellowship of like-minded individuals to reinforce beliefs (church services on 1 or 2 holy days attended on a regular basis). Athiests do none of these things.
@ironmonkeypalm Assuming your a Christian, you know darn well who started Christianity. Unless you deny the divinity of Jesus, he began the Christian church movement when he appointed Peter to start it.
"So you don't believe in nothing??? ". What the heck does that mean? I believe in all kinds of things, I just don't believe in an eternal, spiritual "creator".
@gregrutz Atheism is a belief on assumptions. So atheism is a religion. A more correct way of thinking is believing in nothing, like no brains in your head. That's pretty much nothing.
@ironmonkeypalm It all ways surprises me how stupid religious people are. I realize they don't know shit about science but being religious you would think they would know what a religion is.
And know the difference between believing in something and not believing in something.
Not believind in god is not an assumption. YOU are the one makeing the assumption. YOU ass ume there is a god and it is the one true god and your god is the right god. ALL ASSUMPTIONS
@gregrutz Learn how to spell and you might look intelligent. It always surprises me how childish how atheist acts by name calling and swearing. But I can understand their rants and their dark hearts full of hatred for the fellow man who does not believe in their silly shameful religion of my great great great... grand pappy was tuna. Wow, and I thought the tooth fairy and Santa Claus sounded like Baloney. That evo THEORY puts those fairytales to shame, haha!!
@gregrutz MT 12:33-34 "Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, or make a tree bad and its fruit will be bad, for a tree is recognized by its fruit. You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good? For out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks."
@gregrutz "All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man." Mark 7:23
1 Corinthians 2:14-16 The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Your secular mind can't understand the things of God. But God did give you conscience to understand your sins is an offense to a Holy God.
@ironmonkeypalm What SINS? You assholes keep accusing people of SIN Just because you are a dick head does not mean everyone in the world is. Fuck You and your bibble quotes.
@gregrutz "Not believing" in something is believing in something else. Evangelical-atheists are just self-righteous, pretentious, idaloters. Either everyone is created in the image of God or no one is. Either life came from life or life came from non-life. Unless you can show how non-life created life or explain why people who weren't created in the image of God invented God you really should re-examine your positions.
@gregrutz "Life is made from non-living chemicals"? You mean without "scientists" doing anything? Where can I go see this? I accept micro-evolution and reject the fairytale of "macro-evolution".
@gregrutz What the duece? You were going to tell me where I can go to see non-life coming to life on it's own. I'm still waiting... You are not so simple to believe that micro-evolution is the same as macro-evolution are you?
@redeyetime You are not so stupid to think there is 2 kinds of evolution. Live evolved with the planet over billions of years, sorry I can't show it to you.
@gregrutz Thanks blowhard! I knew you were full of it when you said "Life is still made of non-living chemicals" Do you think scientists could bring your dead brain to life?
For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. Romans 1:20
....ignore the orders of his own dictator, use anti aircraft guns to attack tanks, then be hailed as a hero?
Well it doesnt matter does it? It happened, the chances of all of that happening, never mind adding the chance that that exact sperm would be used to reproduce or that their parents would meet or that he would be in the specific locations he was in. The chances are so slim that it could never happen....oh yeah it did happen didn't it?
FAIL! Evolution assumes abiogenesis ? Nope, 2 different concepts
Talking about the probability of something in the past happening meaning it couldn't have happened = uber fail.
What are the chances that some kid who showed great engineering skills would join the army in the infantry, write the book on infantry attacks, quit infantry to lead a tank battalion when he never worked with them, become field marshal in the german army, go to africa to work under the italians, ignore his superiors...
@gregrutz Um, peanut butter sandwich is organic. Peanut butter is made from peanuts, which comes from plants. The bread is made from wheat, or barley, and comes from plants as well.
Try eating plastic and let me know how goes your body in turning it to life.
@gregrutz You claim that you turned non living chemicals into life. So try plastic, which are composed of non-organic compounds. Peanut butter sandwich are made of organic compounds, which makes your point invalid.
Peanut butter sandwich != non-living chemicals
Plastic == non-living chemicals
By the way, Creationists doesn't say we come from a rock.
@hermanenwang1 You do realize I have a degree in Chimistry and that organic chemicals are made of organic molecules which is anything based on Carbon. Google 'Organic Chemistry''
@gregrutz I wasn't home schooled, but I wish I were.
"Children taught in the home score above average on the state tests, far exceeding public school children. Home schooling is also way cheaper, with great potential to help our overstretched federal budget."
@gregrutz You Dumb Fuck , how do you do you get to evolution, through abiogenesis MORON!!, which is IMPOSSIBLE!!!! No, life from dead chemicals and molecules is IMPOSSIBLE!! atheist chemistry never works! You have faith it happened!! You present nothing but assumptions, with ZERO testable chemistry to show a primitive cell..Scientists can rearrange and borrow pre existing INFORMATION to get there reactions going... but never create life!
Yes, we see evidence of the global flood. You don't have evidence for he big bang. It takes faith to classify humans, they are not great ape. It takes faith to believe chimps are closer to humans. It takes faith that humans are close to any animal. It takes faith to believe we are half a bananna. Without the religion and faith based teachings of abiogenesis you would not have a starting point and everyone knows if you don't start, you don't finish.
@truthtalker49 The universe is expanding at an expanding rate, it must have been smaller in the past.
Too hard for you to understand. ''It takes faith to believe chimps are closer to humans.'' NO, the facts prove Chimps are closer to humans than they are to gorillas. FACE THE FACTS !
Darwin claimed that the theory of natural selection should be regarded as valid provided the intermediate stages proceeding toward a new complex organ were useful for the living being itself. However, as widely pointed out, the processes through which a new organ was to be formed, namely, the incomplete stage in which the new organ is partly formed, is no more than a disadvantageous stage for that living being's life.
@breakarm87 For example, a bat is considered to have evolved from a mouse-like animal. But when the front legs of the mouse-like animal were changing into wings, that animal was in an intermediate state in which legs could not be distinguished from wings-and in that state that animal must have been unable either to fly or to run. Therefore, such a state would have been unfit for the animal's existence
@gregrutz - yes he is a former scientist and yes he studied evolution and taught it at a university. He knows a lot more on the subject than you could ever hope to. Have a good day liar.
@WillyEMS85 No scientist in the world can make life or even the building blocks of life. All they have is assumptions! that one molecule might have linked up with another, or life flew in from space, or polarized light made complex molecules, its all assumptions! Homochirality proves natural processes can not produce life!!
@5tonyvvvv I agree! The theories arent even made for the theory of discovery, because its not even a discovery its a lie. The theories are created for the only purpose they obviously serve for with lies, to attack Gods existence and creation. Look at the source that releases those lies, they arent even atheist scientist, they are actually scientist involved in Masonry, skull n Bones, Bohemian Grove, occultism, and satanism the Gov is involved in. Entertainment Hollywood is also a tool of theirs.
@rockstarMileyCyrus FDA and many Drs are sold out. FDA approved ASPARTAME in food, when testing and trials resulted in Cows n lab rats producing cancer, neurogenic damages, and death following within months. Dr.s and Scientist approve vaccines, but wont give it to their family or them selves. These vaccines cause damages that hardly make it to the evening news because Media is controlled by Gov, and Gov covers alot of things up as we can all tell already for years...
@WillyEMS85 -ya i know all about the drug business being corrupt. I knew someone that needed 4 additional medications just to handle the side effects of just one. Tell me there's no corruption there. The first drug shouldn't even be on the market. Ya vaccines are scary. I knew about Aspartame long time ago. I've been researching about all this corruption in the last 4 years and wow these globalists are making money on us like crazy and trying to get everyone hooked on drugs. Media =gov control
You Tube, copynpaste it: This is proof no one cant deny the scriptures are on point. GOD IS REAL! "NOAH'S ARK FOUND in 2010 on Mount Ararat?"
"The Physical remains of Sodom and Gomorrah - Part 1"
"Red Sea Crossing~Jackkirit~"
"Red Sea Crossing . Where is Evidence . Chariot Wheels Mount Sinai"
"The Exodus and the Red Sea Crossing - Part 1" Do you ask yourself why havent we heard from this ever,not even a glance?Your finally waking up! Theres alot of things they dont expose to us.
@5tonyvvvv Scientists made DNA, put it in a blank cell and it reproduced. The building blocks of life were made a long time ago in a test tube, they are found on comets.
Live make homochirality molecules, not the other way around.
@gregrutz LOL. No MORON! No scientist made DNA, that's Volumes of Information, A single DNA chain had INFORMATION Borrowed and copied and rearranged with spliced in watermarks! and all the pre existing INFORMATION was inserted back into a living bacterium wall..
@gregrutz Idiot? I never disrespected you, were just commenting. Your 50 something and a Fire Fighter and you address people in that manner? No wonder the nation is lost, its full of morons with a 13 yo state of mind and lack for proper mutual respect and maturity. You arrogant prideful ass. I bet your by the end of your life time and still havent learned one thing about life or experience. Whats your mind set full of? Let me guess tits, girls, materialism, stupidity, no values, no morals.IDIOT
For everyone who keeps saying evolution has nothin to do with abiogenesis- you're right It has nothing to do with abiogenesis what he's saying is that evolution must assume that life arose from nothing in order to get off the ground! If you believe in evolution how did life begin? That's what he's saying, you're already assuming there's life to work with! But you're not explaining how that life got there. He's asking you o explain where the first cells came from to start life you cannot assume
@thepeopleinthetrees atheists need to learn homochirality! life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible! naturalistic origins require just as much faith as what Christians believe!
I believe in evolution, how does one God create everything? Christians and Creationist cannot explain how an unseen God is responsible for everything in existance. Evolution proves how everything came to be, 1st there was nothing and then an explosion and then we got everything, then there was no life and then some lighting hit a puddle of water and that is how we got life, then there was kaos and from that came order, now that does not require any faith to believe and is easy to understand.
@rhuezo67 to be an atheist requires more faith than to believe in a god, 800 B.C. the bible was written and predicted everything word by word of was to happen, 95% of the text from even old greek translation was proven to be accurate historically.
Evolution does NOT state that life spontaneously generated, evolution is just the explanation of how new species comes from other species, and how species change.
"Some people believe there is only 1 to the 80th power electrons in the whole universe!"
Is that not an assumption.
Also the way he says how the amino acids must bond together to make a protein is as if he knows how life started. He is making an assumption, what if life started differently, more simply?
We do know how amino acids bond together. Peptide bonds at the N-terminus and C-terminus of two adjacent amino acids regulated by RNA and enzymes for the specific order. When he says "right hand" amino acids, he means the L-isomer, which is correct. The D-isomer, is just a mirror image of the amino acid group. These don't work in proteins, even though the chemicals are identical, the function changes due to shape changes.
Life is not simple, not even in the smallest bacteria.
@nipzie All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'.Homochirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!!!. Which life cant use!!.there is ZERO chance of RNA forming by chance or on a primordial earth or even under amazing conditions in labs.and ZERO chemistry to support it..all we do today is copy pre existing information,thats not creating anything!!..
@G3org3Master atheists need to learn homochirality! life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible! naturalistic origins require just as much faith as what Christians believe! and you must have the chemistry for abiogenesis, in order to get to evolution, you must have the first cell in order for it to evolve, and through natural processes this is impossible!
@G3org3Master No, life from dead chemicals and molecules is IMPOSSIBLE!! atheist chemistry never works! You have faith it happened!! You present nothing but assumptions, with ZERO testable chemistry to show a primitive cell..Scientists can rearrange and borrow pre existing INFORMATION to get there reactions going... but never create life!
Evolution does NOT state that life spontaneously generated, evolution is just the explanation of how new species comes from other species, and how species change.
"Some people believe there is only 1 to the 80th power electrons in the whole universe!"
Is that not an assumption.
Also the way he says how the amino acids must bond together to make a protein is as if he knows how life started. He is making an assumption, what if life started differently, more simply?
i don't feel sorry for anybody, specially not for people thet thinks they great great grandfathers were monkeys :)
Who is the happy person, the one that thinks made of dust and goes back to nothing at the end, or the one that believes that this is just an experience on this planet and something more to come... ???
If everybody believed in Human soul nobody would kill an other person, there would be no wars and we could achieve something miracle like never before.
i really enjoy these videos, believing that we are not just dust and matter but something incredibly high spiritual level creatures should make EVERY HUMAN hAppy instead of arguing and shouting WE ARE MONKEYS... i wish they were monkeys, but THEY ARE NOT, they are robotst thet this society created, robots thet live they life day by day LIKE ANIMALS, without purpose, eating sleeping nice clothing shopping sex, like animals :)
@StentorATX if you want to talk about evidence from tribes and nations reporting events in the far past, then I hope you also accept the reports from throughout history about ancient aliens, otherwise your arguments are no good either. Somehow I doubt you will accept those.
chattlma 1 day ago
Dead things come to life ALL THROUGHOUT the Bible, not only that BUT he doesn't believe life could have evolved from a single cell, YET he believes all human life came from Adam and Eve? and he also believes ALL the animals of the world were saved in a giant boat by Noah? Yeah OK guy! This guy is lacking in basic biology and elementary science knowledge. *rollseyes* This guy is an idiot, I hope no one takes what he says seriously.
TheSinisterdreams 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheSinisterdreams Man can engineer molecules! It shows how it takes INTELLIGENCE in controlled laboratory conditions to mimic, manipulate, plagiarize a cell's Design! Scientists COPY genetic sequences!! They dont create anything!!
Its all Man made Synthetic chemistry! and it has nothing to do with the origin of life!!!! Wake up atheist MORONS! Homochirality is a disaster for any sort of naturalistic origins!
5tonyvvvv 1 month ago
@TheSinisterdreams excuse me sir, but you actually sound like one. You contradict yourself in your first run-on sentence. Evolutionary theory is lacking in basic biology and elementary science knowledge. I don't understand why you find it hard to believe all human life came from Adam and Eve, especially considering you seem to acknowledge belief in the Bible in your first sentence (good choice), and that modern Eve theories clearly point to a single common human mother.
StentorATX 1 month ago
@TheSinisterdreams Now, the Ark is harder for our feeble filtering brain to comprehend, however if you take what you say seriously I hope you will actually put forth a smidgen of effort to study the stories from all tribes and nations on earth about a global flood that killed the human population except one family. Seriously now, we find seashells on top of mountains all over earth. Let's be objective here and not roll our eyes at our ridiculous assumptions.
StentorATX 1 month ago
Oh look, another creationist that doesn't know what he's talking about. There's a reason nobody asks dentists for their opinions on evolutionary biology. Why is this guy being treated as an expert when it is obvious to a scientific amateur that he never understood the theory to begin with.
Antimoronic 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Antimoronic You need to learn Racemic mixtures! That's all man and nature can produce you need to take some Biochemistry classes! and even if all LEFT handed amino acids are present there is nothing that is going to assemble them! Everything is leading towards breaking down not becoming more complex!! Also learn the Law of Biogenesis!!!
5tonyvvvv 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Antimoronic Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
5tonyvvvv 2 months ago
@BelieveandtrustJesus But satan has killed fewer people than God :o He must be a nicer guy, I stick to satan I think :) Or maybe not 'cuz I'm an atheist, but still.
jbkgjbkg 2 months ago
the best people to talk about about how to talk to evolutionists and atheists who have become creationists. they are the most knowledgable. they have been there and know what will get through to people and get them to understand.
OddDude21 2 months ago
Evolution was written to control the masses ! Life comes from Life. ALL physical life as far as we have seen MUST be seeded or passed on from the parent or donor that initially has it; it is not spontaneously generated. God, is the only true life for the day we were conceived and then later born we were subject to death.
CoopersQuill 3 months ago
@CoopersQuill Evolution says nothing about the origin of life. That is a whole different theory, one admittedly not well understood.
TheKatoom 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheKatoom Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
5tonyvvvv 2 months ago
BTW, folks, spontaneous generation was used prior to Pasteur to describe the idea that organisms that spoil food arose spontaneously from the food itself. Pasteur showed it was due to pre-existing contamination in 1862. This hopeless windbag is almost 150 years out of date, and an ignoramus to boot.
thecoopersheldonphd 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thecoopersheldonphd Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
5tonyvvvv 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
5tonyww has never studied anything relating to any branch of science. Homochirality is chemically determined and has nothing whatsoever to do with evolutional validity. Amino acids in proteins are left-handed, and amino acids in carbohydrates are right-handed because of their chemical composition (tony forgot to mention that). He is exceptionally dishonest. As for "dead" chemicals, as they have never been alive, there are no dead chemicals. Name a life form not made of elements tony!
thecoopersheldonphd 4 months ago
Comment removed
thecoopersheldonphd 4 months ago
GOD BLESS YOU FOREVER !!!
GREETINGS FROM SERBIA
MegaMikss 4 months ago
@MegaMikss Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs! Atheists have faith this happened!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
5tonyvvvv 4 months ago
Dr Jobe Martin - Dentist with a masters in theology. qualified in evolutionery biology for why ?
SqueakerAlpha 5 months ago
spontaneous generation is a term of the past to mean the coming into existance of a fully functioning animal like mice, maggots etc. It was falsified by I think Lister in 1800s. abiogenesis however is being researched and some good progress is being made. Certainly eukaryotic cells were not the first life. We certainly dont know the answer yet but give it some time.
SqueakerAlpha 5 months ago
@SqueakerAlpha Spontaneous gerneration falsification:
Francesco Redi (1668)
Lazaro Spallanzani (1765)
Louis Pasteur (1859)
Theres been no reasonable claim to spontaneous generation since, to my knowlege.
helldamaged 4 months ago
@helldamaged Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs! Atheists have faith this happened!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
5tonyvvvv 4 months ago
@5tonyvvvv I would encourage you to research homochirality a little more. Yes it did and still does provide some challenges. "While the origin of the homochirality of amino acids and sugars has been a puzzling problem for decades, recent findings provide plausible explanations." This is quoted from Albrecht Moritz'sarticle "The Origin of Life" posted October 31, 2006. Good luck.
helldamaged 4 months ago
@helldamaged LOL. I have been studying Homochirality for the last 20 years! Its a disaster for atheists! But they will never admit it! As for resent experiments like jack szostak, all he does is borrow pre existing INFORMATION! and its all conducted in controlled laboratory conditions! They are the furthest thing from undirected natural processes! His experiments are not geochemical relevant reactions!
5tonyvvvv 4 months ago
@helldamaged And even if you got all LEFT handed amino acids, how would nature assemble them?? Its impossible! I was an atheist for most of my life! I let go of the Indoctrination!
5tonyvvvv 4 months ago
@SqueakerAlpha Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs! Atheists have faith this happened!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
5tonyvvvv 4 months ago
@5tonyvvvv I am not qualified to dispute your claims. I will however continue to monitor the work being done on abiogenesis and see what they come up with. So far it seems they are making progress. regards
SqueakerAlpha 4 months ago
@5tonyvvvv ''50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate ''
Yes, and that is what happens in a test tube. Life does not happen in a test tube. All reactions are controlled by enzymes. The enzymes only recognize left handed molecules and so life just uses one enantiomer. No big deal.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@ 5tonyvvvv - I am okay with your assumption of intelligent design so long as 2 conditions are met. 1. That your assumption does not keep you from pursuing and recognizing a better explanation if one comes to your attention. And 2. That you don't teach your assumption to anyone without providing solid evidence for your conclusion. Moving on. Complexity does not equal design. I politely encourage you look up the Argument from Ignorance fallacy and/or the God of the Gaps fallacy. Understanding
helldamaged 5 months ago
sorry -continued to 5tonyvvvv - Understanding those can really help someone be more persuasive. As far as proteins coming from nothing check out Adenine. I think you will find it interesting. However, no one says that DNA or life came from nothing. Abiogenesis certainly does not say that, and evolution say nothing of how life started. Some has misinformed you. I encourage you to go research these topics for yourself. Don't take my word for it. Go look it up.
helldamaged 5 months ago
Continued again to 5tonyvvvv - Sorry for the order of the posts my phone is being weird. I think you are missing one fundamental difference in your comparison of life vs. some complex item. You used computers in your example. Others use a watch. That difference is that a defining feature of life is the ability to replicate oneself. Anyways, good luck. Have fun. Peace!
helldamaged 5 months ago
Evolution does not say something came from nothing. And most evolutionary scholars when asked, will give you the known theories we are working on or simply tell you I don't know. Cause thats the honest answer. Either way, its better than saying "God did it." 150 years of research resulting in major advances in medicine, technology and convience and you just want to throw it all out with crap like this.
helldamaged 5 months ago
@helldamaged Intelligence is needed to create software code or assemble a computer! FAR MORE intelligence is needed for the assemblance of the first Cell and thereby DNA. A DNA code is far more complex in design than All the Worlds Softwares COMBINED!! Therefore we can deduce Intelligent DESIGN! Homochirality and hydrolysis would prevent life from ever starting! It is chemically and mathematically impossible for a single protein to form!! Amino acids never assemble themselves!!
5tonyvvvv 5 months ago
@5tonyvvvv ahhh sorry man. I just realized that my comments were not in reply to your post. Sorry. My phone is acting up. I just loaded some responses to your comment. I hope they pique your curiosity.
helldamaged 5 months ago
Please tell me this is satire. What this man is saying has nothing to do with evolution. Look up abiogenisis please. Evolution does not make unacknowleged assumptions. At the very least, if this is serious, go spend 5 min studying the scientific method. Please. I beg you. This video needs to reference peer reviewed articles and reveal who these supposed experts are he is talking about. I bet they can't do that. Propaganda.
helldamaged 5 months ago
@helldamaged You are right, abiogenesis is a separate discipline and evolution makes no assumptions about life origins. However, this means evolution is without a foundation. Since evolution's real objective is to get rid of God as an explanation of the natural world - and don't argue this point please - it fails in answering the most important piece of the evolutionary process, i.e., how it all started. If evolution - or abiogenesis for that matter - can't answer this, then it's a complete fail
raponte1955 4 months ago
@raponte1955 "this means evolution is without a foundation." I am sorry. I do not understand what is meant by this. Please explain how you support this statement. I do have to take issue with "Since evolution's real objective is to get rid of God as an explanation of the natural world." This is a misrepresentation, and I do not understand why I shouldn't argue "this point?" I have several text books here that disagree, and so far, I haven't found any of them saying get rid of God.
helldamaged 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@helldamaged Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs! Atheists have faith this happened!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
5tonyvvvv 4 months ago
@raponte1955 As far as abiogenisis. That fact it doesn't 100% explain the orgins of lfe yet does not make it a failure. This just means we need to do more research.
helldamaged 4 months ago
Try looking at the mud skipper. Works better than the celocanth because it is the only fish that can live both in water, and on land. Really think about all the brain washing evolution has done for you.
pyromancer49 5 months ago
Evolution states that one animal the celocanth became every living thing on the face of the earth, and evolved from an ameba. The ameba is still alive, and the celocanth was said to be extinct millions of years ago. Guess what? it was discovered in the 1930's and is still being found alive all over the world. Exactly as in the fossil record. Evolution says that if the animal evolved into other things, than the previous form should be wiped out. that hasn't happened. Evolution is wrong there.
pyromancer49 5 months ago
@pyromancer49 You said, "Evolution says that if the animal evolved into other things, than the previous form should be wiped out."
Sorry friend, evolution does not say this. Please get a textbook and look up evolution.
helldamaged 5 months ago
If evolution did happen why are there at least two different sub-species of the same animal? Like gorillas, elephants, apes, etc. if evolution happened there should be only one version of each animal. One elephant, one crocodile, one rhino, and so fourth. We see multiple which proves adaptation. Which is completely different from evolution. Adaptation states that the first giraffe became the two modern giraffes we have today (the Masai, and reticulated). As well as with the other animals.
pyromancer49 5 months ago
Have you looked at evolution? Evolution states that one fish branched into everything, where are all the missing links from the fish to the modern animals? Not in the fossil record (which only proves those animals lived at one point in time period). Next no cells in the entire world have the instructions for being alive. (which means they should be dead.I guess in the next million or so years, your pepsi can will begin to live and multiply on it's own.
pyromancer49 5 months ago
@gregrutz you'r the obvious stupid asshole here, calling all those who don't see things exactly eye-to-eye with you, as assholes, is only proving what a dumb stupid idiot you really are. YES Evolution is total BULLSHIT.
Suppressingfire 5 months ago
If you do not accept evolution you do not understand evolution right.
Creationism is bullshit.
GoldenCrusader93 6 months ago
it really lowers your credibility when you infuse 2 different theories xD
OmfgItsHenu 6 months ago
Evolution has nothing to do with how live started.
Darwin wrote ''Origin of Species'' Not origin of life.
gregrutz 6 months ago
Atheism is a faith based religion.
ironmonkeypalm 6 months ago
@ironmonkeypalm theyre a cult.
matrixlone 6 months ago
@ironmonkeypalm "Atheism is a faith based religion"
I get so annoyed when I hear atheism referred to as religion. Nothing could be farther than the truth. Atheists do not believe in a supernatural creator, how is that religion?
Religion has pre-mandated doctrine usually in the form of some "holy" text (bible). Religioins encourage fellowship of like-minded individuals to reinforce beliefs (church services on 1 or 2 holy days attended on a regular basis). Athiests do none of these things.
Irishtupperware 6 months ago
@Irishtupperware So you don't believe in nothing??? I get so annoyed when people that they they think they don't exist.
Where do religious systems come from??? They come from man. God is not a religious system. The Atheist get's mixed up man made systems and God.
ironmonkeypalm 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ironmonkeypalm Assuming your a Christian, you know darn well who started Christianity. Unless you deny the divinity of Jesus, he began the Christian church movement when he appointed Peter to start it.
"So you don't believe in nothing??? ". What the heck does that mean? I believe in all kinds of things, I just don't believe in an eternal, spiritual "creator".
Irishtupperware 6 months ago
@ironmonkeypalm Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby. ID-iot.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz Atheism is a belief on assumptions. So atheism is a religion. A more correct way of thinking is believing in nothing, like no brains in your head. That's pretty much nothing.
ironmonkeypalm 6 months ago
@ironmonkeypalm It all ways surprises me how stupid religious people are. I realize they don't know shit about science but being religious you would think they would know what a religion is.
And know the difference between believing in something and not believing in something.
Not believind in god is not an assumption. YOU are the one makeing the assumption. YOU ass ume there is a god and it is the one true god and your god is the right god. ALL ASSUMPTIONS
NO evidence at all.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz Learn how to spell and you might look intelligent. It always surprises me how childish how atheist acts by name calling and swearing. But I can understand their rants and their dark hearts full of hatred for the fellow man who does not believe in their silly shameful religion of my great great great... grand pappy was tuna. Wow, and I thought the tooth fairy and Santa Claus sounded like Baloney. That evo THEORY puts those fairytales to shame, haha!!
ironmonkeypalm 6 months ago
@ironmonkeypalm Sorry i am dyslexic but hol
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz MT 12:33-34 "Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, or make a tree bad and its fruit will be bad, for a tree is recognized by its fruit. You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good? For out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks."
ironmonkeypalm 6 months ago
@ironmonkeypalm Can you traslate that into secular English so I can understand it.
No wonder you have to 'study' the bible.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz "All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man." Mark 7:23
1 Corinthians 2:14-16 The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Your secular mind can't understand the things of God. But God did give you conscience to understand your sins is an offense to a Holy God.
ironmonkeypalm 6 months ago
@ironmonkeypalm What SINS? You assholes keep accusing people of SIN Just because you are a dick head does not mean everyone in the world is. Fuck You and your bibble quotes.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz "Not believing" in something is believing in something else. Evangelical-atheists are just self-righteous, pretentious, idaloters. Either everyone is created in the image of God or no one is. Either life came from life or life came from non-life. Unless you can show how non-life created life or explain why people who weren't created in the image of God invented God you really should re-examine your positions.
redeyetime 6 months ago
@redeyetime ''Either life came from life or life came from non-life.''
I thought you would say God made it.
Life is still made of non-living chemicals.
I love the way crationists move the goal posts. You have to admit that small [micro] evolution happens so you change the subject to Abiogenesis.
I would show you how life happened but you would say ''Well where did the Big Bang come from, nothing'' So we will skip that part.
If God made the first cell then you would accept evolution?
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz "Life is made from non-living chemicals"? You mean without "scientists" doing anything? Where can I go see this? I accept micro-evolution and reject the fairytale of "macro-evolution".
redeyetime 6 months ago
@redeyetime Scietists don't tell a rock which way to fall. The forces of nature do it.
So glad you accept little evolution. It is all the same.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz What the duece? You were going to tell me where I can go to see non-life coming to life on it's own. I'm still waiting... You are not so simple to believe that micro-evolution is the same as macro-evolution are you?
redeyetime 6 months ago
@redeyetime You are not so stupid to think there is 2 kinds of evolution. Live evolved with the planet over billions of years, sorry I can't show it to you.
Can you show me Adam and Eve?
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz Thanks blowhard! I knew you were full of it when you said "Life is still made of non-living chemicals" Do you think scientists could bring your dead brain to life?
redeyetime 6 months ago
@redeyetime Are all creationists ass holes? They all are stupid and uneducated.
gregrutz 6 months ago
For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. Romans 1:20
ironmonkeypalm 6 months ago
....ignore the orders of his own dictator, use anti aircraft guns to attack tanks, then be hailed as a hero?
Well it doesnt matter does it? It happened, the chances of all of that happening, never mind adding the chance that that exact sperm would be used to reproduce or that their parents would meet or that he would be in the specific locations he was in. The chances are so slim that it could never happen....oh yeah it did happen didn't it?
explosivoification 6 months ago
FAIL! Evolution assumes abiogenesis ? Nope, 2 different concepts
Talking about the probability of something in the past happening meaning it couldn't have happened = uber fail.
What are the chances that some kid who showed great engineering skills would join the army in the infantry, write the book on infantry attacks, quit infantry to lead a tank battalion when he never worked with them, become field marshal in the german army, go to africa to work under the italians, ignore his superiors...
explosivoification 6 months ago
i think everyone should just admit that we 'DONT KNOW" where we came from or how we got here but be thankful that we are here! live life and be happy
wnabhappy 7 months ago
I ate a peanut butter sandwich and turned non living chemicals into life. I must be a god !
gregrutz 7 months ago
@gregrutz nope doesn't make since but nice try
ceaser8999 7 months ago
@gregrutz Um, peanut butter sandwich is organic. Peanut butter is made from peanuts, which comes from plants. The bread is made from wheat, or barley, and comes from plants as well.
Try eating plastic and let me know how goes your body in turning it to life.
hermanenwang1 6 months ago
@hermanenwang1 Only Creatards say we ''came from a rock''. We came from organic compounds, no one says we came from plastic.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz You claim that you turned non living chemicals into life. So try plastic, which are composed of non-organic compounds. Peanut butter sandwich are made of organic compounds, which makes your point invalid.
Peanut butter sandwich != non-living chemicals
Plastic == non-living chemicals
By the way, Creationists doesn't say we come from a rock.
hermanenwang1 6 months ago
@hermanenwang1 And you are still made of non-living chemicals.
Kent Hovind claims evolution says we came from a rock, a rock is like plastic, not organic. We came from organic compounds, not rock or plastic.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz I don't know who Kent Hovind is, but I thought that evolutionists claim we came from a puddle of ooze.
hermanenwang1 6 months ago
@hermanenwang1 We came from a 'puddle' of organic chemicals, not a rock, not plastic.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz You do realize that organic chemicals are composed of inorganic molecules right? Or are you saying that organic chemicals always existed?
hermanenwang1 6 months ago
@hermanenwang1 You do realize I have a degree in Chimistry and that organic chemicals are made of organic molecules which is anything based on Carbon. Google 'Organic Chemistry''
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz Wow, then you better go back to school and get a real Chemistry degree.
Plastic is based on polymers of carbon. So, by your definition, plastic is organic. But previously you said that plastic is inorganic.
So which is it?
hermanenwang1 6 months ago
@hermanenwang1 I never said plastic was inorganic, I said life did not come from plastic or inorganic chemicals, dummy.
You are the idiot who keeps talking about plasitic like it is important.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz It is important when you contradict yourself.
But you seem to be obsessed with rocks so I'll go with that then.
So are you saying then, that if the rock consist of carbons, then it is organic and that life can come from a rock?
hermanenwang1 6 months ago
@hermanenwang1 Having been home schooled I don't think you would understan anyway.
Just like the title of this video.........stupid.
Evolution is not about Abiogenesis.
Darwin wrote >> Origin of Species, not origin of life.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz I wasn't home schooled, but I wish I were.
"Children taught in the home score above average on the state tests, far exceeding public school children. Home schooling is also way cheaper, with great potential to help our overstretched federal budget."
hermanenwang1 6 months ago
@hermanenwang1 Is that how you lernt about Evolution, from your mom?
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz LOL back in junior high now aren't we? I understand. Being 56, you wish you were back on the playground.
hermanenwang1 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hermanenwang1 ''evolutionists claim we came from a puddle of ooze.''
No dummy, Evolution does not comment on how life started.
Scientists don't make an ''evolutionary assumption'' about life, everyone knows it started or we wouldn't be here.
gregrutz 6 months ago
Abiogenesis in not evolution.
Abiogenesis is not spontanous generation.
Homochirality proves all life is related !
gregrutz 7 months ago
@gregrutz You Dumb Fuck , how do you do you get to evolution, through abiogenesis MORON!!, which is IMPOSSIBLE!!!! No, life from dead chemicals and molecules is IMPOSSIBLE!! atheist chemistry never works! You have faith it happened!! You present nothing but assumptions, with ZERO testable chemistry to show a primitive cell..Scientists can rearrange and borrow pre existing INFORMATION to get there reactions going... but never create life!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Yes you get to evolution after abiogenesis. That makes them 2 different things.
So you can't argue if abiogenesis can't be repeated, evolution is not true. Evolution has been observed.
''You have faith it happened!!'' YES, there was no life on earth and now there is. Proof it happened.
You are still made of dead chemicals.
gregrutz 7 months ago
They found the missing links.
gregrutz 7 months ago
WE ARE MADE OF DEAD CHEMICALS, ID-iots.
gregrutz 7 months ago
I ate lunch and turned dead chemicals into life, I must be a God.
gregrutz 7 months ago
Abiogenesis is not the same as spontaneous generation.
You can't make people rise from the dead so christianity is wrong !!
gregrutz 7 months ago
Yes, we see evidence of the global flood. You don't have evidence for he big bang. It takes faith to classify humans, they are not great ape. It takes faith to believe chimps are closer to humans. It takes faith that humans are close to any animal. It takes faith to believe we are half a bananna. Without the religion and faith based teachings of abiogenesis you would not have a starting point and everyone knows if you don't start, you don't finish.
truthtalker49 7 months ago
@truthtalker49 The universe is expanding at an expanding rate, it must have been smaller in the past.
Too hard for you to understand. ''It takes faith to believe chimps are closer to humans.'' NO, the facts prove Chimps are closer to humans than they are to gorillas. FACE THE FACTS !
gregrutz 7 months ago
@truthtalker49 atheists need to learn homochirality! life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
It's called Abiogenesis, not spontanious generation.
It's not evolution either.
gregrutz 7 months ago
Darwin claimed that the theory of natural selection should be regarded as valid provided the intermediate stages proceeding toward a new complex organ were useful for the living being itself. However, as widely pointed out, the processes through which a new organ was to be formed, namely, the incomplete stage in which the new organ is partly formed, is no more than a disadvantageous stage for that living being's life.
breakarm87 7 months ago
@breakarm87 For example, a bat is considered to have evolved from a mouse-like animal. But when the front legs of the mouse-like animal were changing into wings, that animal was in an intermediate state in which legs could not be distinguished from wings-and in that state that animal must have been unable either to fly or to run. Therefore, such a state would have been unfit for the animal's existence
breakarm87 7 months ago
@breakarm87 There is no theory of natural selection. NS is part of evolution. Every species is a complete species, there are no partly formed animals.
Half a wing is called a dinosaur arm with feathers.
gregrutz 7 months ago
good film. Check out Walter Veith's take on Evolution as well at AmazingDiscoveries.tv. He was formally a evolutionist.
rockstarMileyCyrus 8 months ago
@rockstarMileyCyrus And now Walter is not a scientist, he knows nothing about Geology.
gregrutz 7 months ago
@gregrutz - yes he is a former scientist and yes he studied evolution and taught it at a university. He knows a lot more on the subject than you could ever hope to. Have a good day liar.
rockstarMileyCyrus 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rockstarMileyCyrus ''he studied evolution'' Yes, Evolution is Biology. I stand by my statement. >>he knows nothing about Geology.
gregrutz 7 months ago
Thats true! Get your chemicals together and create life, I want to see evolution provoked and created...
WillyEMS85 8 months ago
@WillyEMS85 No scientist in the world can make life or even the building blocks of life. All they have is assumptions! that one molecule might have linked up with another, or life flew in from space, or polarized light made complex molecules, its all assumptions! Homochirality proves natural processes can not produce life!!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv I agree! The theories arent even made for the theory of discovery, because its not even a discovery its a lie. The theories are created for the only purpose they obviously serve for with lies, to attack Gods existence and creation. Look at the source that releases those lies, they arent even atheist scientist, they are actually scientist involved in Masonry, skull n Bones, Bohemian Grove, occultism, and satanism the Gov is involved in. Entertainment Hollywood is also a tool of theirs.
WillyEMS85 8 months ago
@WillyEMS85 - I didn't know that many scientist were tied to secret societies but I did hear that Darwin was recently. Thanks for that information.
rockstarMileyCyrus 8 months ago
@rockstarMileyCyrus FDA and many Drs are sold out. FDA approved ASPARTAME in food, when testing and trials resulted in Cows n lab rats producing cancer, neurogenic damages, and death following within months. Dr.s and Scientist approve vaccines, but wont give it to their family or them selves. These vaccines cause damages that hardly make it to the evening news because Media is controlled by Gov, and Gov covers alot of things up as we can all tell already for years...
WillyEMS85 8 months ago
@WillyEMS85 -ya i know all about the drug business being corrupt. I knew someone that needed 4 additional medications just to handle the side effects of just one. Tell me there's no corruption there. The first drug shouldn't even be on the market. Ya vaccines are scary. I knew about Aspartame long time ago. I've been researching about all this corruption in the last 4 years and wow these globalists are making money on us like crazy and trying to get everyone hooked on drugs. Media =gov control
rockstarMileyCyrus 8 months ago
You Tube, copynpaste it: This is proof no one cant deny the scriptures are on point. GOD IS REAL! "NOAH'S ARK FOUND in 2010 on Mount Ararat?"
"The Physical remains of Sodom and Gomorrah - Part 1"
"Red Sea Crossing~Jackkirit~"
"Red Sea Crossing . Where is Evidence . Chariot Wheels Mount Sinai"
"The Exodus and the Red Sea Crossing - Part 1" Do you ask yourself why havent we heard from this ever,not even a glance?Your finally waking up! Theres alot of things they dont expose to us.
WillyEMS85 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Scientists made DNA, put it in a blank cell and it reproduced. The building blocks of life were made a long time ago in a test tube, they are found on comets.
Live make homochirality molecules, not the other way around.
gregrutz 7 months ago
@gregrutz LOL. No MORON! No scientist made DNA, that's Volumes of Information, A single DNA chain had INFORMATION Borrowed and copied and rearranged with spliced in watermarks! and all the pre existing INFORMATION was inserted back into a living bacterium wall..
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
@WillyEMS85 Darwin wrote ''Origin of Species'' Not origin of life. IDiot.
gregrutz 7 months ago
@gregrutz Idiot? I never disrespected you, were just commenting. Your 50 something and a Fire Fighter and you address people in that manner? No wonder the nation is lost, its full of morons with a 13 yo state of mind and lack for proper mutual respect and maturity. You arrogant prideful ass. I bet your by the end of your life time and still havent learned one thing about life or experience. Whats your mind set full of? Let me guess tits, girls, materialism, stupidity, no values, no morals.IDIOT
WillyEMS85 7 months ago
@WillyEMS85 ID-iot. As in a stupid person who believe in Intelligent Design, global floods and the earth is 6000 years old.
gregrutz 7 months ago
@WillyEMS85 Let me guess tits, girls
YOU DON"T LIKE GIRLS??? Faggot !!
gregrutz 7 months ago
For everyone who keeps saying evolution has nothin to do with abiogenesis- you're right It has nothing to do with abiogenesis what he's saying is that evolution must assume that life arose from nothing in order to get off the ground! If you believe in evolution how did life begin? That's what he's saying, you're already assuming there's life to work with! But you're not explaining how that life got there. He's asking you o explain where the first cells came from to start life you cannot assume
jbenjamin06 8 months ago
Comment removed
zombieofgod 9 months ago
Bullshit!!
Ghettokrieger1234 9 months ago
Chemicals can be dead or alive? So... what's the difference between a "dead" protein and a "living" protein?
YurNotSpecial 10 months ago
It is called Abiogenisis. It has nothing to do with evolution or 'Origin of Species''. It is not chance so probibility does not apply. Keep trying.
gregrutz 10 months ago
1 to the 141st power is 1.
PocketSizedOwlHikari 11 months ago
bottom line is, you evolutionists can say all you want that apes are your ancestors, BUT they certainly aren't mine!
thepeopleinthetrees 11 months ago
@thepeopleinthetrees Why are you classified as an Ape then?
gregrutz 9 months ago
@gregrutz I'm not classified as an Ape, talk to me when an ape can use a typewriter dumb fuck ape, Looks like your still learning.
thepeopleinthetrees 9 months ago
@gregrutz didn't you even watch the video? On the molecular level apes, monkey, etc.. have nothing to do with man.
thepeopleinthetrees 9 months ago
@thepeopleinthetrees On the moleculat lever we are 98.6% the same DNA as a Chimp. They are closer to us than they are to gorillas.
gregrutz 9 months ago
@thepeopleinthetrees atheists need to learn homochirality! life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible! naturalistic origins require just as much faith as what Christians believe!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
@thepeopleinthetrees OK I watched the video. At least until he screwed up. that was at :37 seconds. He said Evolution assumes spontaneous generation.
Wrong And Wrong.
First, The theory of how life started is called Abiogenisis, not Spon. Gen. which was proven wrong a long time ago.
Second, The Theory of Evolution is about how life changed, NOT how it started.
IF science found out God made the first cell, then you would ''believe'' in evoulution. No? Then you can't use that argument.
gregrutz 9 months ago
@gregrutz no we would not fall into the deception
we already know what the creator has done science will never find out about him because this is a test
itssaab 9 months ago
I believe in evolution, how does one God create everything? Christians and Creationist cannot explain how an unseen God is responsible for everything in existance. Evolution proves how everything came to be, 1st there was nothing and then an explosion and then we got everything, then there was no life and then some lighting hit a puddle of water and that is how we got life, then there was kaos and from that came order, now that does not require any faith to believe and is easy to understand.
rhuezo67 11 months ago
@rhuezo67 to be an atheist requires more faith than to believe in a god, 800 B.C. the bible was written and predicted everything word by word of was to happen, 95% of the text from even old greek translation was proven to be accurate historically.
thepeopleinthetrees 9 months ago
@rhuezo67 easy to understand for a brainwashed slave
itssaab 9 months ago
Darwin wrote, ''Origin of Species'' NOT Origin of life. Wrong Theory.
.
And it is not spontanious generation, it is call Abiogenisis. IDiot.
gregrutz 11 months ago
These "scientists" come up with these theories of 'animals related to man' in order to support their beastiality desires!
JamaquinaCubana 11 months ago
Insanity.
MassFragment 11 months ago
Isn't it an assumption that god exists? An assumption that cannot be proven let alone even tested.
apvideogame 11 months ago
Evolution does NOT state that life spontaneously generated, evolution is just the explanation of how new species comes from other species, and how species change.
"Some people believe there is only 1 to the 80th power electrons in the whole universe!"
Is that not an assumption.
Also the way he says how the amino acids must bond together to make a protein is as if he knows how life started. He is making an assumption, what if life started differently, more simply?
Science doesnt know everything.
G3org3Master 11 months ago
@G3org3Master
We do know how amino acids bond together. Peptide bonds at the N-terminus and C-terminus of two adjacent amino acids regulated by RNA and enzymes for the specific order. When he says "right hand" amino acids, he means the L-isomer, which is correct. The D-isomer, is just a mirror image of the amino acid group. These don't work in proteins, even though the chemicals are identical, the function changes due to shape changes.
Life is not simple, not even in the smallest bacteria.
nipzie 11 months ago
@nipzie All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'.Homochirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!!!. Which life cant use!!.there is ZERO chance of RNA forming by chance or on a primordial earth or even under amazing conditions in labs.and ZERO chemistry to support it..all we do today is copy pre existing information,thats not creating anything!!..
5tonyvvvv 9 months ago
@G3org3Master atheists need to learn homochirality! life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible! naturalistic origins require just as much faith as what Christians believe! and you must have the chemistry for abiogenesis, in order to get to evolution, you must have the first cell in order for it to evolve, and through natural processes this is impossible!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Just because YOU don't understand, does not mean it is false.
I will show you a video that can explain to you:
watch?v=_1xJCI9yEgw
Aither watch it all the way through or to answer your specific question, watch from 2:00
G3org3Master 7 months ago
@G3org3Master No, life from dead chemicals and molecules is IMPOSSIBLE!! atheist chemistry never works! You have faith it happened!! You present nothing but assumptions, with ZERO testable chemistry to show a primitive cell..Scientists can rearrange and borrow pre existing INFORMATION to get there reactions going... but never create life!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
@5tonyvvvv You didnt watch the video I sent did you. I am not going to explain it to you like the video because I know you will just ignore it.
PEOPLE, IGNORE THIS GUY, HE IS A WASTE OF TIME.
G3org3Master 7 months ago
Evolution does NOT state that life spontaneously generated, evolution is just the explanation of how new species comes from other species, and how species change.
"Some people believe there is only 1 to the 80th power electrons in the whole universe!"
Is that not an assumption.
Also the way he says how the amino acids must bond together to make a protein is as if he knows how life started. He is making an assumption, what if life started differently, more simply?
Science doesnt know everything.
G3org3Master 11 months ago
nice series
rickgigliotti 1 year ago
I really feel sorry for those guys who fall for this bullshit lol
imnot15im84 1 year ago
i don't feel sorry for anybody, specially not for people thet thinks they great great grandfathers were monkeys :)
Who is the happy person, the one that thinks made of dust and goes back to nothing at the end, or the one that believes that this is just an experience on this planet and something more to come... ???
If everybody believed in Human soul nobody would kill an other person, there would be no wars and we could achieve something miracle like never before.
So who is the happy ONE? ;-)
hardertom 1 year ago
@hardertom great thinking! so whatever makes you happy is bound to be true? So Santa is real after all:)
quitchiboo 11 months ago
@quitchiboo is he not? :)
hardertom 11 months ago
@hardertom i cannot perceive any other logical way how presents were to suddenly appear under my tree every single damn year around the same time^^
quitchiboo 11 months ago
@hardertom ..................Please re-think your next to last sentence.
PocketSizedOwlHikari 11 months ago
i really enjoy these videos, believing that we are not just dust and matter but something incredibly high spiritual level creatures should make EVERY HUMAN hAppy instead of arguing and shouting WE ARE MONKEYS... i wish they were monkeys, but THEY ARE NOT, they are robotst thet this society created, robots thet live they life day by day LIKE ANIMALS, without purpose, eating sleeping nice clothing shopping sex, like animals :)
hardertom 1 year ago
@hardertom facepalm
imnot15im84 1 year ago
@hardertom I'd try to argue with you, but I can't decipher RAndoM CAPs LOcK.
nukepwetty 1 year ago