Thanks so much for being involved in manufacturing lies that compelled the USA to invade sovereign nations you squint-eyed piece of shit. This action, perpetrated by your worthless chink ass among other people, cost the USA society many billions of dollars and caused the deaths of tens of thousands of lives. You ought to be jailed for war crimes as you have no integrity and you choose genocide rather than pacifism and respect for people who did not do the USA wrong at all.
Yoo drafted unconstitutional policy, policy that led to the torture of SUSPECTS. Yoo is the most pathetic bureaucrat in the Justice dept. He can't take responsibility for his own mistakes and he outta go to court for war crimes.
"Implemented the memo" could have meant "carried out the responsibilities of your job by submitting the memo". Or: "implemented into law the legal advice of the memo (he wrote)" - made it a law. I think what Ellison was asking was: "Was there waterboarding/torture done?" Why couldn't he just say so? And how could Yoo answer that? He didn't know - or couldn't say he knew (classified information).
The committee wanted certain answers so that those answers would back up their condemnation of the previous administration. They realized they were probably not going to get those answers (the truth would reveal they were wrong and malicious in bringing this to the stage it was now at) and they became angry because they were going to get exposed. So they tried to set this man up. It is apparent in his demeanor that he did not want to offend them but they were insisting he was offending them!!!
The committee asking the questions showed bias and belligerence when they interrupted him repeatedly and did not allow him to finish even one sentence. They were hostile and sarcastic, not professional and obviously not very intelligent either.
You want to know what's wrong with this country? These people are running it! People are struggling in this country, our economy is on the brink of collapsing altogether, and these people, these bureaucrats, are sitting around arguing the meaning of the word "implement". If Mr. Yoo was truly in a position where he was unable to answer the question, he should have stated that when the question was asked, not dick around until that guy in back fed him a line.
Yoo is an absolute penis. How fucking full of shit is this guy? "John, how do you define 'obfuscate'? How do define 'disingenuous'? How do you define 'complete bullshit'?"
Yoo is not an idiot. I don't agree with most of his arguments regarding the expansiveness of executive power, but his works are compelling. If you agree with his views, study his writings. If you disagree, study his writings even more diligently!
Yoo, here, is backed into a corner. He's desperately trying to grasp at straws and stall in whatever way he can. It's obvious he's withholding information that could implicate him or his administration. He's faking idiocy.
@RavingDissension I havent read any of his writings but from what I can meagerly interpret (i am not a law student) is that he gave a disingenuous reading of law regarding the use of presidential authority and torture. that disingenuous reading was then bolstered by the simultaneously negligent and proactive (or at least proactively negligent) attitudes of the Bush administration surrounding these issues. These attitudes then allowed for atrocities to occur.
"he gave a disingenuous reading of law regarding the use of presidential authority and torture."
In reality, there is no pre-set meaning of the details of the Constitution. Everyone has his or her own interpretations. You may not like Yoo's analysis. Neither do I. But instead of brushing it off with angry tirades, it's better to study his arguments diligently to effectively rebuke him through reason.
he's a graduate of elite universities and faculty of another elite university, if anything, he knows how to argue, how to deflect criticism, how to play semantic games and how to win favors. That's at least 80% of what academic work entails. Judging by his testimony, it's clear that he's a great academician, whereas to how his work would be judged by history, that's a totally different matter. As history doesn't make judgement on morals or popular opinions.
Yoo is an embarrassment to Harvard, Yale, and Berkley. How such a clown got into those schools is beyond me. I've never heard such stupidity. I'd be surprised if he can tie his own shoes.
I dont feel sorry for torturing terrorists...I dont feel sorry for any mothefucker who if given the chance would kill our families..And im supposed to feel sorry giving some terrorists a little bath....Fuck that..Im embarassed to live in a country where people are concerned with Terrorists well being..FUCK THEM..
@WillyT1123 U are a retard! The things passed have taken away YOUR rights, since, the president can call ANYONE a terrorist without evidence and torture them and their family without any human rights or limits. Americas government started every "war" theyve been in, including this FAKE war on terror. Britain does the same damn thing. The police and military are responsible for fake terrorist attacks to get the peoples support and keep them retarded. Dont be a WillyT1123. Hes F***ing retarded.
fantastic bits of advice- cheers!, has anyone used Revlons newest line of products? it is not easy to obtain quality makeup in Smiley yet you can get magnificent samples by checking out "Gratis-Makeup-Samples"! their handy!
What a puffy little shit Yoo is. He's an idiot who helped put in place policies that he was far removed from. He wasn't REALLY aware of how bad they were because he's too simplistic, unempathetic, and ignorant. Him and Alberto Gonzales both are kiss-ass, ridiculous clowns.
Just a thought, but perhaps we should try waterboarding anyone who thinks waterboarding is "not torture", just like we should've set off a flashbang grenade right beside Charles Schumer when he said during the Congressional hearings on the Waco Siege that flashbangs "can't hurt you". Well, have your opinions changed now, assholes?
@theoneandonlygrod "torture" is a concept. Your family certainly thinks suffering through your idiocy every day is considered "torture", but that doesn't make it illegal. The issue here is whether waterboarding is an "acceptable" interrogative practice. In war time and matters of security, some times stern looks just don't cut it. Waterboarding isn't nice, no one is saying it is, but neither is prison, and the discussion is whether the means are appropriate for the ends.
Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand?
You happen to be rather gorgeous, thanks a ton for your tutorial. it happens to be pathetic im living within Alex due to the fact i aren't able to get good cosmetics, however i get hold of cost-free trials from "GratisMakeupSamples". i love Max factor cosmetics!
John Yoo is a genious. Fuck those Democrat assholes. This guy John Yoo is only hung up to scorn because he is a successful Asian. No Black or Latino would be held up to these kind of attacks.
It's a fair question. "the memo was implemented". wtf does that mean? The memo wasn't a directive, or instructions of any kind. It was a plan of action. It was one person's legal justification of a controversial act. How do you "implement" a legal opinion?
we give these guys great responsibility and money and power and they mostly work in the backgrounds, if their shown to be doing shady things such as massive disinterest in following the law they should be strung up by their neck, play the big boy game in a criminal way u fall hard.
John Yoo is a complete douche. I cannot believe he is allowed to teach law. We are in VERY big trouble if he instructs others to act as stupid as he does. His stupid act is an attempt to cover up what an evil scumbag he is.
This trial has become politicized. In the recent finding by Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) that Yoo and Bybee committed no professional misconduct: either for providing strict legal advice and being "close" to the Bush administration. Also, since any words and phase can be easily misconstrued in a political driven trial, I don't blame Yoo for being overly cautious in defining phase that can possibly be "loaded."
Love this guy. Torture is acceptable and preferable. Not only as prevention, but as punishment for terrorists. All you effeminate quislings will cost peoples' lives. Disgusting bedwetters.
I cannot believe Ellison is an elected official. These guys including Ellisin are sitting there trying to get Yoo, who is obviously smarter than other those who are questionning. Taxpayers are paying for these stupid morons for asking stupid questions.
you can tell john yoo is shitting his pants here. he's made up his mind about what he's done and just wants to live his life, and here come these no good pestering people trying to dig up the past.... what chutzpa!
This was ridiculous. The person asking the questions did a terrible job, and asked about information that he knew he couldn't ask about. The reason Yoo responded as he did was because the questions the person was asking was quite simple, retarded.
These Democrats are racist as shit. They saw that "they're for the little guy," but yet, they Justice Thomas, John Yoo, and other "minorities" they disagree with. They're frauds!
To be honest he know's more about the consitutiion then 99.99% of people. By both living in the united states and taking the job that he had, I think it's comical to call him "anti-constitution"
To be honest, if someone invents crazy, ass backward, legal fictions that circumvent constitutional provisions and protections, he is anti-constitutional. No matter how much YOU think YOO knows about the constitution, it is as plain as day to anyone who REALLY knows what the constitution means, that Yoo is a not so slick lawyer who gave the legal advice he was told to by his superiors. He should be in prison.
Why is Yoo being so nice? Having a much bigger brain and much more prestigious credentials, he should have simply embarrassed him with legal terminologies and arguments.
Bloody idiots - no wonder the commander-in-chief clause was written in Article II instead of Article I. Ellison is the proof that the legislature cannot handle anything serious.
While I do agree with your point about adam3176's racial comment, I have to say that you aren't much better considering first of all that you don't seem to understand that torturing other humans beings -- regardless of the motivation -- is inhumane (and just plain wrong) and secondly, because you seem to think that because one man supports Farrakhan and calls himself a Democrat, that all Democrats hold similar views and are, therefore, "treasonous."
And while we're on the topic of definitions, if you ask me, deliberately trying to exploit loopholes and technicalities in the Constitution for the sake of violating the rights of other human beings and then trying to weasel your way out of the repercussions by arguing semantics with Congress and feigning ignorance in general is far more treasonous and anti-American than simply being a "Far-left liberal from NY."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
John Yoo is an American patriot who helped save American lives by rooting out terrorists and Islamic bombers. The 2 clowns in this video are Keith Ellision -- a Louis Farrakhan disciple who is anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American -- and Jerry Nadler, a far-Left liberal from NY. Ellison couldn't get a security clearance based on his past and current asociations and should definitely be watched as a 5th columnist. Bring back HUAC and start investigating these treasonous Democrats.
John Yoo is a Ball licking Cock sucker dick licker.. The prezident must have threatened to send this Jap fuck back to yoohooville.. We all know he burried someone alive!!
Either he's willingly dodging questions, which he's obviously doing, or he's so fucking stupid that he managed to make it into one of the highest Law Enforcement Offices in this Country without being able to use the fucking english language.
the truth is. that this is a distraction. mate, you konw. that we argue about pointless stuff. but what are we doing to help the world. watching tv and people arguing about stuff is a distraction. we need to do something bro. i reccomend the first thing you can do is check my channel. and find out about orgonite. peace and respect. 2t1
your right. but if he does talk about stuff. he may get fired. or intimidated. this guy is a puppet. he doesnt need attack mate. he is just a puppet. to take the flak. we dont need him to admit it. WE KNOW they torture. :P we dont need to have some government figure to admit. we know it. they dont admit it. if they admit it will we do ne thing? does it matter, what they do. we HAVE to do spomething to help these poor people being tortured! we must help. peace and love. 2t1
Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand?
Of course Yoo knows what "followed" means, I think he is just playing Ellison for time. He does an Oscar winning role of an idiot. And of course he knew the opinions set on the memo were going to be put into effect. That is the reason they were written in the first place, a legal umbrella.
Ellison was behaving as a fool who couldn't define his words. Opinions are just that -- opinions about a legal matter, which advise the policymakers regarding what may be allowed, and what is prohibited. Yoo did not know whether his memos were followed, to the extent that policymakers allowed actions in keeping with the interpretation of the law that was laid out in the legal opinions.
Ellison clearly defined "implemented" for him at 2:22 to a degree that even a 13 year old kid, not to mention a Justice Department Official should be able to understand. John Yoo knows full well what "implemented" means, he just doesn't want to answer the question.
@BloggerMusicMan You are making the classic mistake of assuming that the general use of the word in typical conversation is the same as in legal discussions. Davis comments on this towards the end when he mentions "ordinary use of terms" Ellison was essentically asking Yoo if his legal briefing became practice. Yoo cannot answer this question because he simply does not know.
@BloggerMusicMan Additionally, Yoo made a briefing that stated on his definition of the law those techniques were legal. He had absolutely no clue to what extent his legal brief played, if it played any at all, in the administrations decision to allow those techniques. Think of it this way. How often does a CEO double-back to the lowly analyst and let him know how a report the analyst made sterred the CEO's decision. It probably never happens.
@BloggerMusicMan If you had a clue about what you are talking about, you'd realize that the paper Yoo wrote does not provide any sort of method for action. To say "implemented" in this scenario implies that the paper Yoo wrote has a certain action it wants to effect, when it reality it was an investigation into what constitutes torture. The man who asked this question is either a moron or willing to put forth a loaded question. Either way, Yoo wiped the floor with him in a subdued fashion.
In other words, he gave advice, as an attorney, to his client. He didn't necessarily know what his client did with that advice, and couldn't elaborate at any great length about that advice or his client's stated intentions. There's that pesky little thing called the common law, which ordinarily prohibits attorneys from revealing the discussions with his client. Same rule applies for husband and wife.
What a fucking scum bag. This guy literally deserves to die for the memos he helped to draft. This guy practically wrote the war on terror, and all based on manipulative pseudo-legal nonsense. Complete goddamn douche, inexcusable criminal.
its funny how is everybuddy focusin on how bad the guy sucked n noot how bad is wut hes tryin to hide by bein so devious..he is not retard he is jus fakin it cuz its the smartest way to get around these importent questions ,by jus bein a dam fuk !
Mr. Yoo is responsable for his own actions and if the Neo Cons are in control of the military they are hiding behind this man. He is aware of their control and is complicit in their actions of a coup against the constitution such as President Eisenhower warned.
Thank goodness for Arthur Davis or we would have had to continue to listen to jibber jabber. LORD, answer the question, is TOO MUCH TO ASK FOR, AN HONEST ANSWER. Dancing around the question only makes you look like a coward and a fool. Be A MAN and stand up for what you did. You did it than, MAN UP TO YOUR ACTIONS. Yoo is so pathetic its ridiculous.
Law is always open for interpretation from whoever is in control. That is a universal truth. If a law says there is no stealing, and someone robs a child, suddenly the child is not an adult so it is technically not stealing.
Smart ass? How about a person who is supposed to exercise an oversight role with respect to Yoo and his colleagues in the OLC? These people are all lawyers; and hopefully some of those lawyers will soon not be lawyers, and perhaps wearing orange jumpsuits for war crimes.
don't be silly. Yoo has BS and Law Degree from Harvard. He/they are supposed to be the cream of the crop in lawyers. Do you really think he will be disbarred or sent to prison. I'm a lawyer and I can tell you no. It wont happen.
I'm not saying he can't be disbarred, I'm saying he wont be disbarred.. Yoo is not Libby. Libby was a nobody. Just another white guy with an ivy league degree. Yoo is supposed to be a Con. Law expert. I think he graduated with honors. Guys like him get a lot of wiggle room. When this is over he wil be rich from books and speeches. Libby committed perjury. You just wrote an "opinion." Where is the criminal intent? The conspiracy? He will walk!
I never said he would be, either. I'm just not as arrogant as to assume that because he went to an Ivy League school and had high marks there and he was a "Con Law expert" (big deal), that he is above the law. The Bar lets people like him go all the time. If you truly are an attorney you should know that...and don't take yourself or your profession so seriously...there are already 499 of you on the bottom of the ocean...snark.
With your awareness Sir. I hope you might be among those who would seek to assure that no amount of privilege clouds misuse of power. It is important to our constitution as a particular foundation that privilege not be judged less ernestly than ethical stamina of expertise.
Unethical behavior is the very human act of letting the mind be in service to the narcissistic powers of the person. Is there anything at any of the "Cream of the Crop:" institutions that measures to what extent an expert is capable of acting in the service of the client. In this case Mr. Yoo was a servant of the constitution and the counsel to the President in support of the constitution. Is there a way the bar measures for such service or disservice? Very interested in your answer.
If Prof. Yoo's attempt is to define what's legal, illegal, as opposed to what's kind, compassion, etc., he's doing a great job. Writers such as Harold Koh often confused what's legal with kindness, compassion, etc and end up REQUIRING kindness as part of our legal obligation. Yoo should be understood in the context of his defining what's legal.
"Implement" in the broad context of what's legal, what's not. Remember, people like Harold Koh attempted to broaden our legal obligation to outside the traditional U.S. jurisdiction, to overseas. His Hatian case went to the U.S. Supreme Court only to be struct down for the same logic. What's legal and illegal are different from kindness, compassion, etc.
Implement: 1. any article or device used or nedded in a given activity 2. any thng or person used as a means to some end 3. to carry into effect 4. to provide the means of carrying out. That is what my dictionary says.
these congress dudes would get alot more from their 'detainee' if they used the 'rapport building' techniques that the FBI uses when questioning suspects.
the rudeness and raised voices dont really accomplish anything. .. . or do they?
They are asking Professor Yoo to speculate on actions outside his personal knowledge. He's not the right person to ask. Legally speaking he is not allowed to comment.
Whether or not you like what he wrote, there is absolutely nothing illegal about what Dr. Yoo did.
Also, he did not actually command anyone to torture anyone. The real person you're saying should be going to prison is President Bush. That's not going to happen.
As much as you may wish the USA doesn't torture, history seems to indicate otherwise.
Congressmen are not infallible, what they were asking Dr. Yoo to speculate on is illegal. It's a good thing he didn't fall for it.
So, you don't think Yoo authorizing the crushing of children's testicles in front of their parents is illegal?
Time for you to go read the Constitution again...or have you ever read it?
Or maybe someone from the military in another country should crush your testicles, or your children's testicles crushed in front of you and then you may take on a slightly different point of view.
Specifically, Dr. Yoo never said that it was ok to crush anyone's child's testicles. When that absurd question was raised, he responded that there was no treaty which prohibited it. That is true.
I don't know which part of the constitution you are referring to. Perhaps it would be best if you cited it, if you can find it.
No one ever said torture wasn't horrific, Yoo hasn't commanded anyone to torture. He has shown the legality of the president to use whatever means he deems necessary in war.
What war??? We have conflicts these days not wars. A War requires congressional approval within 30 days of deploying troops. John Yoo is an imperialist dick. He wants to give complete power to the executive branch, power to monitor, torture, censor, kill, almost dictatorial....
Being a graduate of Harvard law school and a career lawyer, he seemed to be rather clumsy in defending himself or deflecting questions that clearly he didn't want to answer directly.
all I can say to this video is you've gotta be kidding me.
overall, I'm pretty sure he's dicking him around. Given the succinctness of everyone else speaking there and asking simple questions, his blundering and passive aggressive demeanor here shows he clearly has no intention of giving him a straight answer, and he used the vauge idea of a "detailed answer" to claim he had privilege to not answer. Also you can hear the whispers of his ghost lawyer in the background if you bump your volume.
Hopefully, Mr. Yoo will be made to disappear and subsequently tortured.
j4unumber1 3 weeks ago
Thanks so much for being involved in manufacturing lies that compelled the USA to invade sovereign nations you squint-eyed piece of shit. This action, perpetrated by your worthless chink ass among other people, cost the USA society many billions of dollars and caused the deaths of tens of thousands of lives. You ought to be jailed for war crimes as you have no integrity and you choose genocide rather than pacifism and respect for people who did not do the USA wrong at all.
j4unumber1 3 weeks ago
john yoo is amazing
DJWEBSTAR914 3 weeks ago
what an embarrassment Yoo is to this Nation.
yanikv 2 months ago
Yoo is a criminal and a traitor...
dale3858 2 months ago
5:48 that guy in the backgrounds face "Kill me"
Artur Davis "Why are you not saying what my fellow black man wants you to say?"
ken1334 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thank Yoo, you helped get Usama more than Obama did XD
keeperofconundrums 8 months ago
Comment removed
keeperofconundrums 8 months ago
@keeperofconundrums shut up idiot.
thatswhatisaidyeah 8 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah that is your great rebuttal??... Shut up...? Orly...
keeperofconundrums 8 months ago
Read Courts at War and Judicial Review by Yoo - He's insane!!!
pelleogmartin 9 months ago
@pelleogmartin He is nothing more than a spineless "company man." He is not insane...just pathetic...
yanikv 2 months ago
Fuck Yoo.
cochranexyz 9 months ago 5
Yoo drafted unconstitutional policy, policy that led to the torture of SUSPECTS. Yoo is the most pathetic bureaucrat in the Justice dept. He can't take responsibility for his own mistakes and he outta go to court for war crimes.
james1forification1 9 months ago
"Implemented the memo" could have meant "carried out the responsibilities of your job by submitting the memo". Or: "implemented into law the legal advice of the memo (he wrote)" - made it a law. I think what Ellison was asking was: "Was there waterboarding/torture done?" Why couldn't he just say so? And how could Yoo answer that? He didn't know - or couldn't say he knew (classified information).
NoellaC25 10 months ago
The committee wanted certain answers so that those answers would back up their condemnation of the previous administration. They realized they were probably not going to get those answers (the truth would reveal they were wrong and malicious in bringing this to the stage it was now at) and they became angry because they were going to get exposed. So they tried to set this man up. It is apparent in his demeanor that he did not want to offend them but they were insisting he was offending them!!!
NoellaC25 10 months ago
The committee asking the questions showed bias and belligerence when they interrupted him repeatedly and did not allow him to finish even one sentence. They were hostile and sarcastic, not professional and obviously not very intelligent either.
NoellaC25 10 months ago
How could Yoo know if it was implemented or not? He's not a CIA operative.
Visfen 11 months ago
Yoo is a yes man and cares nothing for the constitution.
MrBullfrog9876 1 year ago
You want to know what's wrong with this country? These people are running it! People are struggling in this country, our economy is on the brink of collapsing altogether, and these people, these bureaucrats, are sitting around arguing the meaning of the word "implement". If Mr. Yoo was truly in a position where he was unable to answer the question, he should have stated that when the question was asked, not dick around until that guy in back fed him a line.
Tardis1217 1 year ago
john yoo is korean. go asian boy
hojoleon 1 year ago
yoo has a better grasp of the constitution than all the people in this video/ on this thread combined.
ellison is a cocksucker
rigatony019 1 year ago
Yoo is an absolute penis. How fucking full of shit is this guy? "John, how do you define 'obfuscate'? How do define 'disingenuous'? How do you define 'complete bullshit'?"
bootymanager 1 year ago
Fuck you, Yoo.
andreaandrewmilnefan 1 year ago
looks like Ellison got nothing from his legal education from Minnesota.
ieodksnw787 1 year ago 3
Yoo, with his north Korean torture expertise and Atty Gen Gonsalves, with his mexican justice system expertise ...works like a charm for Republicans.
athar077 1 year ago
Yoo is not an idiot. I don't agree with most of his arguments regarding the expansiveness of executive power, but his works are compelling. If you agree with his views, study his writings. If you disagree, study his writings even more diligently!
Yoo, here, is backed into a corner. He's desperately trying to grasp at straws and stall in whatever way he can. It's obvious he's withholding information that could implicate him or his administration. He's faking idiocy.
RavingDissension 1 year ago
@RavingDissension I havent read any of his writings but from what I can meagerly interpret (i am not a law student) is that he gave a disingenuous reading of law regarding the use of presidential authority and torture. that disingenuous reading was then bolstered by the simultaneously negligent and proactive (or at least proactively negligent) attitudes of the Bush administration surrounding these issues. These attitudes then allowed for atrocities to occur.
dadadevo 1 year ago
@dadadevo
"he gave a disingenuous reading of law regarding the use of presidential authority and torture."
In reality, there is no pre-set meaning of the details of the Constitution. Everyone has his or her own interpretations. You may not like Yoo's analysis. Neither do I. But instead of brushing it off with angry tirades, it's better to study his arguments diligently to effectively rebuke him through reason.
RavingDissension 1 year ago
@RavingDissension
he's a graduate of elite universities and faculty of another elite university, if anything, he knows how to argue, how to deflect criticism, how to play semantic games and how to win favors. That's at least 80% of what academic work entails. Judging by his testimony, it's clear that he's a great academician, whereas to how his work would be judged by history, that's a totally different matter. As history doesn't make judgement on morals or popular opinions.
eatfastnoodle 1 year ago
@eatfastnoodle
"As history doesn't make judgement on morals or popular opinions."
Sadly, it does. Historicity of various controversial topics is in constant flux and debate. The unanimous consensus only relates to trivial matters.
"That's at least 80% of what academic work entails."
Not really, semantics only gets you so far. Have you read his dissertations? Yes, they're cleverly worded but they're also loaded concrete evidence.
RavingDissension 1 year ago
Yoo is an embarrassment to Harvard, Yale, and Berkley. How such a clown got into those schools is beyond me. I've never heard such stupidity. I'd be surprised if he can tie his own shoes.
ast453000 1 year ago
yoo is sick bastard
JI394 1 year ago
gotta love this shit...stall it as long as you can...only one minute left...only one minute left.
mykylc 1 year ago
I dont feel sorry for torturing terrorists...I dont feel sorry for any mothefucker who if given the chance would kill our families..And im supposed to feel sorry giving some terrorists a little bath....Fuck that..Im embarassed to live in a country where people are concerned with Terrorists well being..FUCK THEM..
WillyT1123 1 year ago
@WillyT1123 U are a retard! The things passed have taken away YOUR rights, since, the president can call ANYONE a terrorist without evidence and torture them and their family without any human rights or limits. Americas government started every "war" theyve been in, including this FAKE war on terror. Britain does the same damn thing. The police and military are responsible for fake terrorist attacks to get the peoples support and keep them retarded. Dont be a WillyT1123. Hes F***ing retarded.
XenovannHellwolf 1 year ago
fantastic bits of advice- cheers!, has anyone used Revlons newest line of products? it is not easy to obtain quality makeup in Smiley yet you can get magnificent samples by checking out "Gratis-Makeup-Samples"! their handy!
shamekacostabile 1 year ago
What a puffy little shit Yoo is. He's an idiot who helped put in place policies that he was far removed from. He wasn't REALLY aware of how bad they were because he's too simplistic, unempathetic, and ignorant. Him and Alberto Gonzales both are kiss-ass, ridiculous clowns.
ridewave444 1 year ago
Just a thought, but perhaps we should try waterboarding anyone who thinks waterboarding is "not torture", just like we should've set off a flashbang grenade right beside Charles Schumer when he said during the Congressional hearings on the Waco Siege that flashbangs "can't hurt you". Well, have your opinions changed now, assholes?
theoneandonlygrod 1 year ago
@theoneandonlygrod "torture" is a concept. Your family certainly thinks suffering through your idiocy every day is considered "torture", but that doesn't make it illegal. The issue here is whether waterboarding is an "acceptable" interrogative practice. In war time and matters of security, some times stern looks just don't cut it. Waterboarding isn't nice, no one is saying it is, but neither is prison, and the discussion is whether the means are appropriate for the ends.
goodnamestaken 1 year ago
@goodnamestaken And yet, 70 years ago, we executed several Japanese officers for practicing the exact same tactic. When did the rules change?
theoneandonlygrod 1 year ago
Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand? Do Yoo understand?
imrich6 1 year ago
John yoo is smarter than any of those people that questioning him combine. Go John Yoo, you save our country.
Larryjoh 1 year ago
They should torture Yoo to death. What a nazi fuckface.
ikilicoglu 1 year ago 2
You happen to be rather gorgeous, thanks a ton for your tutorial. it happens to be pathetic im living within Alex due to the fact i aren't able to get good cosmetics, however i get hold of cost-free trials from "GratisMakeupSamples". i love Max factor cosmetics!
minotpkgsqo 1 year ago
John Yoo is a genious. Fuck those Democrat assholes. This guy John Yoo is only hung up to scorn because he is a successful Asian. No Black or Latino would be held up to these kind of attacks.
ericclaptonismygod31 1 year ago
Send the terrorists to this lil asian faggot's house for---you know what!!!
Al Quaida! Here is a feww gay target!!
What a faggot - waterboard him
MsDellastreet 1 year ago
@MsDellastreet fuck yourself faggot.
Larryjoh 1 year ago
the the guy askin the question did a excellant job in terrogating mr yoo
itsacrises 1 year ago
hope you guys go to jail
baik 1 year ago
Yoo seems like a slick slimy sneaky person.
xBloodXGusherx 1 year ago
It's a fair question. "the memo was implemented". wtf does that mean? The memo wasn't a directive, or instructions of any kind. It was a plan of action. It was one person's legal justification of a controversial act. How do you "implement" a legal opinion?
goodnamestaken 1 year ago
@goodnamestaken silly person
mvagusta750 1 year ago
yoo is brilliant
coming from minneapolis i can tell you that ellison is a creep
rigatony019 1 year ago
YOO IS A WAR-CRIMINAL!!!
log140 1 year ago
Yoo is just crazily scared to say something wrong and burry him (and others) alive.
BeNNzuFG 1 year ago
This man is an very clever idiot! Beware!
WomanforPeaceSanity 1 year ago
how could Yoo be teaching law school and he doesnt know what the word implement meens?
TonPappa 1 year ago
Fuck Yoo.
Im glad we have insane people in America that will hunt him down and do bad things to him.
AvatarOfAvatar 1 year ago
humorous in its hypocrisy
rigatony019 1 year ago
we give these guys great responsibility and money and power and they mostly work in the backgrounds, if their shown to be doing shady things such as massive disinterest in following the law they should be strung up by their neck, play the big boy game in a criminal way u fall hard.
chizzy555 1 year ago
i think all these games yoo is playing shows there might be something he is hiding
chizzy555 1 year ago
John Yoo is a complete douche. I cannot believe he is allowed to teach law. We are in VERY big trouble if he instructs others to act as stupid as he does. His stupid act is an attempt to cover up what an evil scumbag he is.
fredxmertz 1 year ago
This trial has become politicized. In the recent finding by Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) that Yoo and Bybee committed no professional misconduct: either for providing strict legal advice and being "close" to the Bush administration. Also, since any words and phase can be easily misconstrued in a political driven trial, I don't blame Yoo for being overly cautious in defining phase that can possibly be "loaded."
bacterialgeneralpori 1 year ago
Yoo is like a retarded baby
withouafight 1 year ago
Is Yoo on drugs? He seems all disoriented. And I was expecting him as an assistant attorney general to be "oriented" ZING!
kakompo 1 year ago
Kim Jon II sure will be proud of Yoo- they both agree that torturing is ok. Way to go YOO.
kakompo 1 year ago
Comment removed
kakompo 1 year ago
Love this guy. Torture is acceptable and preferable. Not only as prevention, but as punishment for terrorists. All you effeminate quislings will cost peoples' lives. Disgusting bedwetters.
Alfrunk 2 years ago
I think Ellison is drunk with power and Ego gratification
letsjam2 2 years ago
Ellison wants him to submit to the Umma
letsjam2 2 years ago
I cannot believe Ellison is an elected official. These guys including Ellisin are sitting there trying to get Yoo, who is obviously smarter than other those who are questionning. Taxpayers are paying for these stupid morons for asking stupid questions.
sammy0630 2 years ago
you can tell john yoo is shitting his pants here. he's made up his mind about what he's done and just wants to live his life, and here come these no good pestering people trying to dig up the past.... what chutzpa!
Tuppington 2 years ago
John Yoo is not going to be cornered. Jon Stewart couldn't rattle him up. John Yoo handed Jon Stewart his ass.
nibortheyak 2 years ago 2
Yeah, except he was just a douchebag who refused to answer any questions with any kind of directness. He looks like a complete fool.
"Uh, um... I.... what do you mean? Do you mean me? Wait while I turn and ask these other people for help on how I can evade making an answer."
frenchtoasty17 2 years ago
Very poor questioning. Yoo is right here. Mr. Ellison looks like the fool.
And it's true, no one knows the Constitution better than John Yoo.
SoulPower00 2 years ago 2
Democrat was racist towards Yoo because he was Korean.
wreckedpc 2 years ago
Dems have repeatedly shown themselves to be the party of racism.
Alfrunk 2 years ago
this is the shittiest interrogator ever
MelchBurg 2 years ago
This was ridiculous. The person asking the questions did a terrible job, and asked about information that he knew he couldn't ask about. The reason Yoo responded as he did was because the questions the person was asking was quite simple, retarded.
desantiscm 2 years ago 17
@desantiscm everyone who liked this is retarded
utubeisdi 1 year ago
@desantiscm Nonsense.
Hissyspit 7 months ago
These Democrats are racist as shit. They saw that "they're for the little guy," but yet, they Justice Thomas, John Yoo, and other "minorities" they disagree with. They're frauds!
ZDWmiamicane 2 years ago
Justice Yoo is anti-constitution.
djzacmaniac 2 years ago
To be honest he know's more about the consitutiion then 99.99% of people. By both living in the united states and taking the job that he had, I think it's comical to call him "anti-constitution"
desantiscm 2 years ago
To be honest, if someone invents crazy, ass backward, legal fictions that circumvent constitutional provisions and protections, he is anti-constitutional. No matter how much YOU think YOO knows about the constitution, it is as plain as day to anyone who REALLY knows what the constitution means, that Yoo is a not so slick lawyer who gave the legal advice he was told to by his superiors. He should be in prison.
djzacmaniac 2 years ago
Simply unbelievable.
soulshaker123 2 years ago
Im-implement?
FGN123 2 years ago
Ellison = doofus
johnielsen08 2 years ago 3
The guy asking questions didn't do a good job either, I've seen people grill scum better than that
fox20012 2 years ago
Poor Yoo, lookin like a fool and shit
lol
jkeller2008 2 years ago
Why is Yoo being so nice? Having a much bigger brain and much more prestigious credentials, he should have simply embarrassed him with legal terminologies and arguments.
Bloody idiots - no wonder the commander-in-chief clause was written in Article II instead of Article I. Ellison is the proof that the legislature cannot handle anything serious.
BrandenburgConcertii 2 years ago
Adam, John Yoo is Korean. Thanks for showing us your intelligence -- and bigotry and anti-Americanism.
zl1vette427 2 years ago
While I do agree with your point about adam3176's racial comment, I have to say that you aren't much better considering first of all that you don't seem to understand that torturing other humans beings -- regardless of the motivation -- is inhumane (and just plain wrong) and secondly, because you seem to think that because one man supports Farrakhan and calls himself a Democrat, that all Democrats hold similar views and are, therefore, "treasonous."
ph43rd37h 2 years ago
And while we're on the topic of definitions, if you ask me, deliberately trying to exploit loopholes and technicalities in the Constitution for the sake of violating the rights of other human beings and then trying to weasel your way out of the repercussions by arguing semantics with Congress and feigning ignorance in general is far more treasonous and anti-American than simply being a "Far-left liberal from NY."
ph43rd37h 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
John Yoo is an American patriot who helped save American lives by rooting out terrorists and Islamic bombers. The 2 clowns in this video are Keith Ellision -- a Louis Farrakhan disciple who is anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American -- and Jerry Nadler, a far-Left liberal from NY. Ellison couldn't get a security clearance based on his past and current asociations and should definitely be watched as a 5th columnist. Bring back HUAC and start investigating these treasonous Democrats.
zl1vette427 2 years ago
This man deserves to die. Nothing else is sufficient to punish him for his horrific actions.
Stantzs 2 years ago
John Yoo is a Ball licking Cock sucker dick licker.. The prezident must have threatened to send this Jap fuck back to yoohooville.. We all know he burried someone alive!!
adam3176 2 years ago
I burst out laughing at 4:49 something a smart ass kid would say.
dimvoly 2 years ago
So if I had a traffic ticket, and I pulled this shit, what would you suppose would happen to me?
rnewport 2 years ago
He almost got black on his ass
madworldx1 2 years ago
bahahaha wow politics fail
luckyjrs 2 years ago 2
i can't wait for the day americans get to play human pinata with this douche bag.
gisforgary 2 years ago
You can tell that John Yoo does not want to answer the question, because he knows damn well he's busted and exposed if he does.
BloggerMusicMan 2 years ago
Either he's willingly dodging questions, which he's obviously doing, or he's so fucking stupid that he managed to make it into one of the highest Law Enforcement Offices in this Country without being able to use the fucking english language.
What a bunch of bullshit this was.
Zen5012 2 years ago
the truth is. that this is a distraction. mate, you konw. that we argue about pointless stuff. but what are we doing to help the world. watching tv and people arguing about stuff is a distraction. we need to do something bro. i reccomend the first thing you can do is check my channel. and find out about orgonite. peace and respect. 2t1
conceptual0theorist 2 years ago
your right. but if he does talk about stuff. he may get fired. or intimidated. this guy is a puppet. he doesnt need attack mate. he is just a puppet. to take the flak. we dont need him to admit it. WE KNOW they torture. :P we dont need to have some government figure to admit. we know it. they dont admit it. if they admit it will we do ne thing? does it matter, what they do. we HAVE to do spomething to help these poor people being tortured! we must help. peace and love. 2t1
conceptual0theorist 2 years ago
god Ellison is an idiot.
Burning0Lilac 2 years ago
Ellison is the idiot?
charowls 2 years ago
Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand? Do yoo understand?
louise12345 2 years ago 2
Of course Yoo knows what "followed" means, I think he is just playing Ellison for time. He does an Oscar winning role of an idiot. And of course he knew the opinions set on the memo were going to be put into effect. That is the reason they were written in the first place, a legal umbrella.
dgracey01 2 years ago
Fuck Yoo!!!
A2Kaid 2 years ago
Yoo graduated from Harvard and Yale Law!?? Seriously?...What an idiot.
joharmon86 2 years ago
Ellison was behaving as a fool who couldn't define his words. Opinions are just that -- opinions about a legal matter, which advise the policymakers regarding what may be allowed, and what is prohibited. Yoo did not know whether his memos were followed, to the extent that policymakers allowed actions in keeping with the interpretation of the law that was laid out in the legal opinions.
sbquigley 2 years ago
Ellison clearly defined "implemented" for him at 2:22 to a degree that even a 13 year old kid, not to mention a Justice Department Official should be able to understand. John Yoo knows full well what "implemented" means, he just doesn't want to answer the question.
BloggerMusicMan 2 years ago 7
@BloggerMusicMan You are making the classic mistake of assuming that the general use of the word in typical conversation is the same as in legal discussions. Davis comments on this towards the end when he mentions "ordinary use of terms" Ellison was essentically asking Yoo if his legal briefing became practice. Yoo cannot answer this question because he simply does not know.
captwasabi 1 year ago
@BloggerMusicMan Additionally, Yoo made a briefing that stated on his definition of the law those techniques were legal. He had absolutely no clue to what extent his legal brief played, if it played any at all, in the administrations decision to allow those techniques. Think of it this way. How often does a CEO double-back to the lowly analyst and let him know how a report the analyst made sterred the CEO's decision. It probably never happens.
captwasabi 1 year ago
@BloggerMusicMan If you had a clue about what you are talking about, you'd realize that the paper Yoo wrote does not provide any sort of method for action. To say "implemented" in this scenario implies that the paper Yoo wrote has a certain action it wants to effect, when it reality it was an investigation into what constitutes torture. The man who asked this question is either a moron or willing to put forth a loaded question. Either way, Yoo wiped the floor with him in a subdued fashion.
7sidthekid 4 months ago
@BloggerMusicMan ya dum LULZ
ken1334 4 months ago
In other words, he gave advice, as an attorney, to his client. He didn't necessarily know what his client did with that advice, and couldn't elaborate at any great length about that advice or his client's stated intentions. There's that pesky little thing called the common law, which ordinarily prohibits attorneys from revealing the discussions with his client. Same rule applies for husband and wife.
sbquigley 2 years ago
Worst.
porgeet 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Elisson is a dickhead!!! FUck him
fantasy4evr 2 years ago
What a fucking scum bag. This guy literally deserves to die for the memos he helped to draft. This guy practically wrote the war on terror, and all based on manipulative pseudo-legal nonsense. Complete goddamn douche, inexcusable criminal.
DeadBirdCitizen 2 years ago 4
its funny how is everybuddy focusin on how bad the guy sucked n noot how bad is wut hes tryin to hide by bein so devious..he is not retard he is jus fakin it cuz its the smartest way to get around these importent questions ,by jus bein a dam fuk !
coolish0hellish 2 years ago 7
you have got to pity those poor sods at Boalt law school.
Can you imagine trying to learn from this a2222hole? And WHAT would you learn?
UC Berkley should fire him and he should be disbarred.
tomomifishy 2 years ago
Yoo is ridiculous...
Melpheos1er 2 years ago
Mr. Yoo is responsable for his own actions and if the Neo Cons are in control of the military they are hiding behind this man. He is aware of their control and is complicit in their actions of a coup against the constitution such as President Eisenhower warned.
laurasIs2c 2 years ago
Thank goodness for Arthur Davis or we would have had to continue to listen to jibber jabber. LORD, answer the question, is TOO MUCH TO ASK FOR, AN HONEST ANSWER. Dancing around the question only makes you look like a coward and a fool. Be A MAN and stand up for what you did. You did it than, MAN UP TO YOUR ACTIONS. Yoo is so pathetic its ridiculous.
Herby85 2 years ago
someone send this guy back to kim jong il. Immigrant fuck
lastruplaya 2 years ago
John Yoo is a dick, semantic games
MysteryManoLove 2 years ago
this is soo stupid. this is what goes on in washington. absolutely nothing...
150133 2 years ago
he is not a bumbling idiot. He is a slime ball. He knows what he is doing.
DARTHeeek 2 years ago
Yoo is a fumbling idiot. To think we have minds like this in our Justice Department. That scares me more that al-Qaida. Fuck-N-A!
phillipmarch22 2 years ago
Professor Yoo is a lawyer, but he does not know the rules in the forum in which he is providing testimony! Incompetent for sure! Not just immoral...
antonscottgoustin 2 years ago 2
waterbording him 180 times then let him 11 days not sleep, beat him and let him hungry.
Is not torture its fun.
Poor America
morpheus341 2 years ago
eff yoo, slimy argumentative stupid-playing smartest guy in the room bullshit artiste [sic]. fit him for an orange jumpsuit.
4bibimimi 2 years ago
Law is always open for interpretation from whoever is in control. That is a universal truth. If a law says there is no stealing, and someone robs a child, suddenly the child is not an adult so it is technically not stealing.
tubub 2 years ago
Wow, this makes me sympathize with Yoo just because that Congressman is a smart ass
tubub 2 years ago
Smart ass? How about a person who is supposed to exercise an oversight role with respect to Yoo and his colleagues in the OLC? These people are all lawyers; and hopefully some of those lawyers will soon not be lawyers, and perhaps wearing orange jumpsuits for war crimes.
madisonhack 2 years ago
don't be silly. Yoo has BS and Law Degree from Harvard. He/they are supposed to be the cream of the crop in lawyers. Do you really think he will be disbarred or sent to prison. I'm a lawyer and I can tell you no. It wont happen.
blackonics 2 years ago
'In 1975, as a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar, Libby received his Juris Doctor (JD) degree from Columbia Law School.[34][35]'
That's Scooter, the disbarred and convicted Scooter Libby that they're talking about here.
'With his conviction for felony offenses, Dean was disbarred as a lawyer, so could no longer practice law.'
And John Dean, Watergate John Dean here.
Don't think just because he is a lawyer he can't be disbarred and go to jail. I'm not optimistic, but it is certainly in the cards.
madisonhack 2 years ago
I'm not saying he can't be disbarred, I'm saying he wont be disbarred.. Yoo is not Libby. Libby was a nobody. Just another white guy with an ivy league degree. Yoo is supposed to be a Con. Law expert. I think he graduated with honors. Guys like him get a lot of wiggle room. When this is over he wil be rich from books and speeches. Libby committed perjury. You just wrote an "opinion." Where is the criminal intent? The conspiracy? He will walk!
blackonics 2 years ago
I never said he would be, either. I'm just not as arrogant as to assume that because he went to an Ivy League school and had high marks there and he was a "Con Law expert" (big deal), that he is above the law. The Bar lets people like him go all the time. If you truly are an attorney you should know that...and don't take yourself or your profession so seriously...there are already 499 of you on the bottom of the ocean...snark.
madisonhack 2 years ago
With your awareness Sir. I hope you might be among those who would seek to assure that no amount of privilege clouds misuse of power. It is important to our constitution as a particular foundation that privilege not be judged less ernestly than ethical stamina of expertise.
laurasIs2c 2 years ago
A bullshit degree? hahahahah
MysteryManoLove 2 years ago
Unethical behavior is the very human act of letting the mind be in service to the narcissistic powers of the person. Is there anything at any of the "Cream of the Crop:" institutions that measures to what extent an expert is capable of acting in the service of the client. In this case Mr. Yoo was a servant of the constitution and the counsel to the President in support of the constitution. Is there a way the bar measures for such service or disservice? Very interested in your answer.
laurasIs2c 2 years ago
Of course he can go to prison. He is being sued as we speak. NO ONE WILL BE IMMUNE TO THE LAW, NOT EVEN THE PRESIDENT.
asrbwettaw 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
oamao84 2 years ago
Un-fucking-believable, this yoo guy was actually in our Justice Deparment. Scary!
phillipmarch22 2 years ago
He isn't, any longer. He teaches law now. Great.
madisonhack 2 years ago
If Prof. Yoo's attempt is to define what's legal, illegal, as opposed to what's kind, compassion, etc., he's doing a great job. Writers such as Harold Koh often confused what's legal with kindness, compassion, etc and end up REQUIRING kindness as part of our legal obligation. Yoo should be understood in the context of his defining what's legal.
cooljeansguy 2 years ago
Yoo wasn't asked what was legal. He was asked what "implement" meant.
peaceispatriotic7 2 years ago
"Implement" in the broad context of what's legal, what's not. Remember, people like Harold Koh attempted to broaden our legal obligation to outside the traditional U.S. jurisdiction, to overseas. His Hatian case went to the U.S. Supreme Court only to be struct down for the same logic. What's legal and illegal are different from kindness, compassion, etc.
cooljeansguy 2 years ago
Implement: 1. any article or device used or nedded in a given activity 2. any thng or person used as a means to some end 3. to carry into effect 4. to provide the means of carrying out. That is what my dictionary says.
phillipmarch22 2 years ago
"needed":
Needed can have a wide variety of meanings.
I don't know what YOU mean by needed
Oh! Is that my character limit for this response?
I didn't need anything.
(five minutes of being talked to by my lawyer)
I'm sorry but discussion of what is or was needed and by whom is classified.
McConsumer 2 years ago
Oops, I meant needed. This is not my definition, it is straight out of the dictionary!
phillipmarch22 2 years ago
these congress dudes would get alot more from their 'detainee' if they used the 'rapport building' techniques that the FBI uses when questioning suspects.
the rudeness and raised voices dont really accomplish anything. .. . or do they?
phdecora 2 years ago
Yoo looks like a pasty dumbass. During the entire questioning, he's just saying dodging every question.
Then he gets called out on it and says the same thing.
Hansfish 2 years ago
They are asking Professor Yoo to speculate on actions outside his personal knowledge. He's not the right person to ask. Legally speaking he is not allowed to comment.
ericcommando 2 years ago
Yoo is going to prison pretty soon. This torture thing's got some SERIOUS legs. We are the USA, we don't torture.
zackgreer 2 years ago 2
Whether or not you like what he wrote, there is absolutely nothing illegal about what Dr. Yoo did.
Also, he did not actually command anyone to torture anyone. The real person you're saying should be going to prison is President Bush. That's not going to happen.
As much as you may wish the USA doesn't torture, history seems to indicate otherwise.
Congressmen are not infallible, what they were asking Dr. Yoo to speculate on is illegal. It's a good thing he didn't fall for it.
ericcommando 2 years ago
So, you don't think Yoo authorizing the crushing of children's testicles in front of their parents is illegal?
Time for you to go read the Constitution again...or have you ever read it?
Or maybe someone from the military in another country should crush your testicles, or your children's testicles crushed in front of you and then you may take on a slightly different point of view.
whitehill0004 2 years ago
Specifically, Dr. Yoo never said that it was ok to crush anyone's child's testicles. When that absurd question was raised, he responded that there was no treaty which prohibited it. That is true.
I don't know which part of the constitution you are referring to. Perhaps it would be best if you cited it, if you can find it.
No one ever said torture wasn't horrific, Yoo hasn't commanded anyone to torture. He has shown the legality of the president to use whatever means he deems necessary in war.
ericcommando 2 years ago
What war??? We have conflicts these days not wars. A War requires congressional approval within 30 days of deploying troops. John Yoo is an imperialist dick. He wants to give complete power to the executive branch, power to monitor, torture, censor, kill, almost dictatorial....
jrlawmn 2 years ago
I just heard that Yoo just might get a spanking! Gawd! That fucker should go to prison!
phillipmarch22 2 years ago
yeah but people just love to watch congress members yelling into a microphone.
phdecora 2 years ago
Where are the FALN Terrorist when we need them? Both houses of congress are an abomination. This a cluster fuck!
gladeyeater 2 years ago
what a joke. i wonder if he knows the meaning of scumbag.
johnnondrowsyd 2 years ago 3
ha hah aaaa
supasoul20 2 years ago
This is probably one of the most pathetic things I have ever seen.
soulshaker123 2 years ago 2
Why is every comment to this video a novel
BlueRajasmyk 2 years ago
Americans prosecuted Japanese soldiers for
water boarding.
America has now become it's own worse enemy,
Will you or will you not prosecute those that committed Torture ?
If not, you are finished as a country in the world.
dave777blaster 2 years ago
Being a graduate of Harvard law school and a career lawyer, he seemed to be rather clumsy in defending himself or deflecting questions that clearly he didn't want to answer directly.
eatfastnoodle 2 years ago
all I can say to this video is you've gotta be kidding me.
overall, I'm pretty sure he's dicking him around. Given the succinctness of everyone else speaking there and asking simple questions, his blundering and passive aggressive demeanor here shows he clearly has no intention of giving him a straight answer, and he used the vauge idea of a "detailed answer" to claim he had privilege to not answer. Also you can hear the whispers of his ghost lawyer in the background if you bump your volume.
dadadevo 2 years ago
he's a lawyer that's how they talk
phdecora 2 years ago
Why don't he just use the "I Do Not Recall" like Al Gonzie?
lucasboden 2 years ago
"Do you understand what I mean by implemented now sir?" wow!
urlostman