my bessler perpetual motion design

[frank0067]

IM not one of those saps who think pertetual motion and free energy dont exsist.. but this design can use some assistance to make it work

[TAPriceCTR]

@satinISsexy

yes, regardless of whether there is any heat movement heat is a property of matter. if we were to actually turn heat into other forms of energy the substance from which we extracted the energy would become cool. being able to transform raw heat into energy would actually create a heat differential. hypotheticaly rather than use energy to run your AC unit to cool something down you would gain energy from cooling it down

[11011011011100110]

Dont stop think. dont drink fluorid water.

Our brain has plus one wheel yeey

[Macocio]

Won't work.

[BaggioVL15]

AHAHA!!! I guess it would spin in another direction ))))))

[tinusz4]

when will people realize lifting the ball costs more energy than dropping one will give you

[Enigm0id]

This could be... a good flywheel. But not perpetual motion.

[mindprism]

The principle behind this leveraging isn't possible. But I assume you know that.

[overunitydotcom]

Hi, well done, but you can only get something to work, if you use the virtual centrifugal forces and convert them somehow into rotational forces. Also use springs with it to store the forces and movements. Only with levers and torque arms you will never get anything selfrunning ! This is from my own research. P.S: Please subscribe to my youtube channel. Just click on my username and the subscribe. Many thanks. Regards, Stefan.

[yekanekafleka]

muy raro y bonito ,pero la figura azul no cave es iimposible

[truthseeker007U]

this setup wouldn't work, there would come an equilibrium position in which it would stop moving.

[logancohen]

what did you use to make this animation?

[Nonopurwono]

good think, but to complex

[guillermuss]

HAS ANYONE HEARD ABOUT CONSERVATION OF ENERGY?

[monkeyzNdogz]

Good Idea but it'll balence out leaving nothing once you factor in friction

[mentallyunhinged]

maybe if you keep doing drawings (for ever) this could work (for ever)

[shoaler]

To all those who say that a PMM is possible: Just build one and let it run for a few years with no outside energy source. Drawings don't count -- I've never seen a drawing fail yet. And machines that slow down because "I just don't have the magnets adjusted right yet" don't count either.

[molinobeer]

@shoaler

Hey, you are forgetting that gravity, is an outside form of energy, so, i guess they are all cheating!

[2hueb4u]

@molinobeer

No, gravity is the curvature of space...

[philipmazz27]

To all those who say that a PMM is impossible:

Though it IS impossible through our current understanding of physics, as time goes on and science advances, we may see that some of our "laws" are truly just broad generalizations that reflect the current limits of our perception. I don't mean to say that anything is possible, but rather to stress the importance of approaching such ideas with an open mind. Forward thinking is what drives innovation.

[LebrelZ]

@philipmazz27 What actually drives innovation is not sticking to failed designs proven totally impossible to work like 30.000 million times and just using our minds to produce things that can work with our current physics understanding. Inconsistences with physical laws come by themselfs as we progress and there we are to modify our therories to accomodate and explain the new discoveries.

Most people who design magnet-based PMM's just don't know what a magnet is and how it works.

[jotacril]

Perpetual waste of brain

[AfghanKnight007]

wrong

[llamadogwillkillu]

its impossible

[PARABELLVM]

Principios de la Termodinámica:

1°-"Principio de la conservación de la energía". "La energía no se crea ni se destruye, solamente se transforma de un tipo de energía en otro".

ES IMPOSIBLE CONSTRUIR EL MÓVIL PERPETUO DE PRIMERA ESPECIA"

2°- "Principio de la degradación de la energía" El calor no puede transformarse íntegramente en otros tipos de energía, siempre una parte de la energía calórica inicial se degrada".

ES IMPOSIBLE CONSTRUIR EL MÓVIL PERPETUO DE SEGUNDA ESPECIE"

[PARABELLVM]

Corolario del 2° Principio:

La ENTROPÍA DEL SISTEMA SIEMPRE AUMENTA, porque algunos de los procesos que se describen en un ciclo, son SIEMPRE IRREVERSIBLES", rozamientos>>generación de calor>>irreversibilidad>> NUNCA SE PUEDE CONSTRUIR UNA MÁQUINA QUE FUNCIONE SIN ADICIONARLE ENERGÍA"

Mejor estudiar como AHORRAR ENERGÍA"

[stevesrd]

Nothing is impossible, it just seems as such for a time, look at history to yout proof.

[gskaloyan]

Perpetual motion is impossible, nothing can generate energy equal to, or greater than that it receives. Even stars, one example of a near perfect engine, are all slowly working to a state of rest.

As cliched as it is, nothing lasts forever.

[PyroTomas]

i dont think it would be possible to make machine like that in real life, but i think the ideas people come up with are kinda neat

[waddler3214]

NERDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ALL OF U

[HavazikFerric]

not nerds, geeks :3

[waddler3214]

both

[1monsoonwoman1]

Hi, you are on the right track, I have made an attempt at a gravity wheel and I am very close to cracking it, my current model is not working, though I know how to fix it and make a working model. Keep up the great work!

[UnderManiac]

Continue to work on your idea if you feel you must, but physics will tell you that it will never work. There are too many forces at play keeping the machine from working the way you see it.

The wheel will always be in balance (if you discount the friction forces). The math is out there describing this kind of thing.

[RamoneTalarico]

haha the only thing perpetual about these devices are the attempts to make them.

But i strongly encourage the work..i believe that it is possible to harness energy in ways that we are not currently utilizing.

[MarkArandjus]

I agree. Perpetual motion is impossible but there should be a device that can runfor long periods of time using gravity. Gravity it doesn't need a constant source liek fossile fules or runs dry like hydroenergy. And every now and then it would get a little push. However nless it was big or in vast numberso r both I don't see how a quasi-perpetual motion device could be practical.

[TAPriceCTR]

@RamoneTalarico

agreed. there is never going to he a true perpetual motion device but if someone could figure out how to convert heat into energy that would be the holy grail of energy production, currently we can turn heat differential into energy, but we can not turn plain heat into energy.

[TAPriceCTR]

@RamoneTalarico

agreed. there is never going to he a true perpetual motion device but if someone could figure out how to convert heat into energy that would be the holy grail of energy production, currently we can turn heat differential into energy, but we can not turn plain heat into energy.

[UnderManiac]

Do the mathematical equations and you will find that all the forces are equal on all sides at all times. This is what's affectionately knows as a "unbalanced wheel".  It has been tried in real life with no success. By the way, magnetic motors, using only stationary magnets don't work either. Same thing. All the forces balance each other out.

[johnnyboy922]

to be fair i like where your going but the forces dont balance out. the input is always greater than the output if your talking kinetic energy because the friction in all these devises causes heat energy to be lost so no matter how perfect the thing may seem it will never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever be perpetual

[silverslic5]

thats why we need to find out how to reach absolute zero bwahahaha

[utsavman47]

this may not work due to equal torques on both sides

[xC3110x]

I seriously doubt that this would work, but I think it might be a vaguely interesting video if it had more than 3fps!

[oldnotweak]

yeah but this is a cool design

[CUB3FR34K]

English dude...

[musiciangonefishin]

This one falls into the seduction class. Read about it. Won't work need need more energy to raise the balls than falling makes. You're sittin still unless you add a magnet but then you lose again. The seductions include "one side heavier." but also scale decreases output dramatically. Keep thinkin though.

[cyborgtroy]

And one side looks heavier until you do the math and realize it's still just a wheel with little gadgets added.

[oldnotweak]

perpetual motion is foolish only works under very specific circumstances and rarely perfect forget motion think chemical

[PhuqueU]

oldnotweak,

Why must your kind run around telling people what to think? 

Who ellected you to be "Thought Police"? The Dupont Family?

[oldnotweak]

actually i am Brian Estevar Duponte but who were you talking about?

[oldnotweak]

are you talking about not were that didnt even make sense

[giddygiddy85]

whats it gonna be useful for? actually a lazy hamster might buy 1 off ya,lol

[kiikasi]

Does anyone else hear sounds when they see silent patterns? :S

[cetko13]

i do

[elevadon]

me too^^

[kiikasi]

synesthesia is so cool XD Do you also see years in colors and patterns and see colors when you hear sounds? :P I do! :D

[elevadon]

i do see colors in sounds and odors^^

i've never had anything with year, but i doo "feel" numbers with objects^^

and sometimes corners feel itchy...

[doldei]

i see a lots of friction...

[tman2j4]

leonado davinchi had a model the same as that but aftr he made it it didnt work

[albikavo]

perpetual motion huh, when will people stop wasting their time whith this crap. It will only work in an ideal world with no forces of friction etc and it's incapable of any practical application.

[Aff01000001]

Exactly, but if someone makes one of theese that stops after a VERY long time and is energy-free, we could archieve something

[anandaadhar]

Go ahead, watch Finsrud's perpetual motion machine...

[citizenofelysium]

Very true. But I there may yet be some force that is ever present in the universe that we can use; something similar to wind power. the wind blows weather we use it or not but we do slow it down by using it but in the case of a "Universal wind" I doubt we would ever use up its momentum. Or using it up would also coincide with the end of the universe so who would be left to care.

[albikavo]

if we would keep using the kinetic energy of such a force then it wouldn't be a perpetual machine anymore because this ever present force will supply it with energy indefinitely. (for example a wind or water turbine generator fits your description because it's driven by a force that never ends but however it's not a perpetual machine) A perpetual machine is supposed to work for a long time (or forever) after some energy has been given to it and no more energy is supplied from any outside source.

[citizenofelysium]

Yes, I know. I was only making the point to others that maybe the device I suggested would be a better use of their time instead of perpetual motion. Since a perpetual motion machine, even if you could eliminate all the obstacles and make it run, would lack acceleration and therefor be fairly useless. Pretty to look at maybe, but it couldn't produce. It would be more like a battery for kinetic energy; storing it for later use. For it to produce it would have to accelerate not simply run.

[ChemicalMikeUK]

if there was a way to change the weight of the weights inside the wheel, this might just work. has anyone tried liquid instead of weights?

[MnKndsDoom]

LOL!!! People forget about the weights returning back around the wheel, they are in opposition to gravity. So overall, the wheel is always balanced no matter how the entire machine is configured. You WILL DIE of OLD AGE before you get it to spin for any significant amount of time. This type of mechanism (the overbalanced wheel) will NEVER spin long enough nor powerful enough for any kind of practical use. Please, just give up on this idea.

[montreano]

see the position of the balls @ 0:08. ball below is zero force because its in the middLe. how about other 3 balls? i suppose the right side is the same force with the left side. thats will cause the wheel to slowly stop.

[TheDrakenZ]

pretty cool idea, but try making it.

[bentleius]

oh, if you think the blue thing is good for an extra "kick" at the top, that doesn't come free--it's countered by the eventual backslide of the same piece. No net advantage of the blue piece

[bentleius]

also, the blue-colored component seems superfluous. Basically it adds nothing that is not already achievable by the shape of the compartment plus gravity. No apparent point in the movable blue piece

[bentleius]

I think this would achieve equilibrium quickly. Equilibrium state would be as at 0:04 or 0:09, with axes at around 45 degrees, right around the second bump symbol. This won't work. Bessler had a number of designs similar to this one that he acknowledged to be failed attempts.

[jmgev]

esta entao e que funciona mesmo alem da forca utilizada ainda adicionamos mais a friccao para ajudar

[cavor44]

I like this idea but the video gets warped as the wheel turns. A working prototype is really needed!!

Best of luck

[BezemerPeter]

build a real one

[jklmuk]

animations prove nothing!!

[vuvumia]

it won't work in real from my understanding. It will stop for sure at 00:07 when you see the lines all straight like plus sign inside the wheel.

[Tzombee]

bored?

[Jacobdm0]

interesting idea, bring it to reality!

[Jacobdm0]

interesting idea, bring it to reality!

[Rotitomato]

The idea looks pretty convincing.

[LittleTruckingBozo]

You are kidding right?

[isketch86]

it may be convincing just at 0 friction

[conceptmachine]

Look carefully, is there more weight on the right side than the left? That is important.

[bluebeard2]

It's rotating. It can't have more weight on the right than the left, because the right and the left and swapping sides :P

[bladeattila]

Bessler wheel moved in two directions!

But great work!

[sheebawarrior99]

agreed please build prototype and show us...otherwise interesting

[Lazken]

action = reaction

the bits pushing on the wheel are also attached to the wheel. if it kicks, it has to push back onto something. if that thing is the same one, its impossible.

the sum of all forces must be 0. it always is. perpetual motion is impossible, at least in a purely kinetic way, I believe

[toamaori]

I believe us humans still have many things to learn. there should always be those who keep an open mind that the universe is able to operate outside of the laws we have created. We might be able to discover some amazing things we otherwise would not have.

[bluebeard2]

Conjecture is a good thing. But until it's experimentally verified, it remains conjecture.

[toamaori]

yes :)

[dekree]

impossible with this setup..i do honestly think perpetual motion is possible, but not this way. your kinetic with potential is underunity. thats 100%fact

[UTOTSAHANGIN]

interesting animation trick... show us real one