we are supposed to be all gods children no matter what .is this not the case anymore ??????? gay or straight or transgender.the whole idea of religion is to keep people in order do these church people have first hand experience of god and the bible? it was written 1000 years after these so called events WERE THEY THERE NO.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Another LIE! You have not answered the simple FACT. That you deny that a CREATOR exist. Then you say that GOD only wants us to be happy. I am still waiting on your response. I know that you received it. But, the SCRIPTURE does say that you are deceivers and liars. When you have nothing all you is hide. By, not responding that is exactly what you aree doing. You are a very confused individual. Saying one thing that another thing.
your scripture is full of holes, why does your god induct the genocide of the world's, from the holocaust to Stalin to the Armenian genocide, to the Rwandan genocide?
You haven't read the book of the theory, and you continue to say it is made of lies when you haven't ever read it.
A creator cannot exist as quantum mechanics says that everything must be interconnected and that there must be a cause to the effect
How about this Quantum mechanics says that anything unobserved changes its outcome
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD I already responded to this foolishness. But, I would like to add something to it. Who is feeding you this foolishness? Where does the BIBLE say that? When the blind lead the blind they both fall into the ditch. Especially, those that do not really care for you.
@xlanciferionx Because, he knows that he can not prove it. That reminds me of Charles Darwin and his foolish imagination in stating that a bear evolved into a whale. Just by seeing the bear catch some fish. Even evolutionist do not believe that.
There is nothing wrong with being gay, you're just a fascist because what ever isn't you, what you believe in or what violates your terms isn't acceptable in your world. Then you try to hate on them and get them to convert, which is the same fascism that Hitler used, and that Stalin used, you're no better than those genocidal freaks
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Then take up with the LORD of Heaven. Because that is what the Scripture states. I am only the messenger.How ironic when you have no valuable arguement you rely on calling persons names.
Actually, there is more. But, I only used them as examples. There is also heterosexual examples. But, all originate from the same theory of evolution. If you believe that we came form apes. Then you can behave as as animal. Eventhough, animals do not do the things we do. Are we not supposed to be evolving?
no, humans have so ridiculously adapted ourselves to technology that we have no predator and we can live in almost every climate, so I guess Humans have evolved intelligence which makes them solve their problems.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Could it be that the LORD of Heaven told to rule back in the book of Genesis. Along with naming the animals once they were created. Why is it there murder, rape, theft, and liars? How have we resolved that problem? No amount of technology can take care of the sin problem. That is why Christ came to take care of. Eventhough, in the end is your choice. Once, again the LORD told to fill the planet.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD I am sending you a couple of qoutes from evolutionists to prove that evolution opened the door to all kind of wickedness. "I am haunted by a conviction that the nihilistic philosophy which so-called educated opinion chose to adopt following the publication of the Origin of Species committed mankind to a course of automatic self-destruction. A doomsday was then set ticking."—*Sir Fred Hoyle, The Intelligent Universe (1983), p. 9. [Hoyle is a renowned British Astrophysicist.]
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD You mean after 100 years it is still being debated. HOW SAD! That after 100 years you are still confused and have no evidence for evolution. These are your own scientists speaking. You are your own worst enemy.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Then why do you claim that DNA supposedly proves evolution? I believe that you are confused. Are you saying that why cannot or why can? You said before that they can. Now you are saying they cannot. Are you that confused? HOW SAD!
It sounds good in theory. But, that is it. The FACT that the DNA can not be altered to create a new species.Who would alter it? There is a barrier in it.
"FACT that the DNA can not be altered to create a new species"
You must be completely ignorant. Explain how flavobacterium K172 came about. Or, explain how hybridization does not do this very thing. Show me that mules do not exist.
1 John 1:9 If we confess our sins, HE is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness
2 Peter 3:9 The LORD is not slack concerning HIS promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance
John 3:16 For GOD so loved the world, that HE gave HIS only begotten SON, that whosever believeth in HIM should not perish, but have everlasting life. THERE IS HOPE
Where does it say that? I have been reading the Scripture for 18 years and I have yet to find such foolishness. He does want you to be happy. That is a FACT but not while practicing immorality. In that case I would have been happy beofre I heard the gospeol. Are you not the same one that stated that the four gospel writers lived after the crucification of Christ. Who is telling you these lies? If that was the case. Why did HE destroy SODOM? Please! I do not hate you. Neither does the LORD.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD I am going to join wolf in their response. I am going to wait for your foolish response. If that is true than HE owes Sodom and me an apology. But, from what I observe it has been a week. I also thought that you said the GOD does not exist.
, 1:32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
1:29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity, whisperers 1:30 backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents 1:31 without understanding, covenant breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful,
1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature 1:27 and like also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another: men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their own error which was meet 1:28 and even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge.
A scientific theory is as accepted as a law. We have the gravitational theory, the theory of relativity, the atomic theory, etc, all of which are accepted because they have been tested and never yeilding different results. Evolution is no different.
Whom set the laws of gravity and the atomic energy? Did they create themselves? Once again that goes contrary to the SECOND LAW OF THERMODYMANICS. Evolution is not a scientific FACT.
@xlanciferionx You are behaving like an eight year old foolisn little girl. Like wolf posted professing to be wise have become foolish. He already posted it. You can also google it. Unless, you are wiser than the scientists.
@DRR180 You are going by LAWS that are set by the Creator. But, the evolution theory will never be proved by valid science. Considering the FACT that all your fossil claims failed. All your DNA claims failed. All your ape theory failed. What do you really have. It is sad that you have to rely on LIES to support your theory. Since, all this examples have been proven to be hoaxes and LIES. As for the proto-bird that has been metioned. It is another hoax.
These laws are special to our dimension and there are 4 observed dimensions, and 7 other unobserved dimensions, and each has their special properties.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Than then gravity an inanimate taught to itself that it was going to change its nature. That would go contrary to the second Law of Thermodynamics. which your scientists state that it can not be done.Furthermore, the very existence of the Second Law - and other so-called "Laws of Nature" such as the Laws of gravity and motion - is in and of itself a powerful testament to the existence of God. .
"Than then gravity an inanimate taught to itself..."
Is English your first language, or a secondary?
Those "laws" are only our interpretation of what is. What evidence do you have that a creator set these "laws" forth? What evidence do you have to support your assertion that a creator exists?
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD While Man may author the particular wording of these Laws that we see in textbooks, or express them in logical systems of his own devising, these Laws were not created by Man. The metaphysical reality of these Laws is Universal and Man merely represents them in his writings. The existence of these Laws compels us to ask the rhetorical question: "How can there be Laws without a Lawgiver?" To which we reply: "There can't be." So if Man is not the Lawgiver, then who is?
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Who could have the Power and Authority to proclaim Laws that affect the entire Universe? The inescapable answer is: "God. That's who!"[Isaac Asimov in The Origin of the Universe in the ORIGINS: How the World Came to Be video series (PO Box 200, Gilbert AZ 85299 USA: Eden Communications, 1983).]
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD On the contrary look around at nature and creation. The speak of the CREATOR. Also look at the failure of the evolution theory. You have no other choice if you reject the LIE of evolution. As for the supposed Theory of Everything I am not going to waste my time with theories that are based on LIES.
nature says nothing about creation of anything, nature is the ecosystem of species living together.
The theory of everything proves every single natural phenomenon in our 3rd dimension and 1 time dimension spectrum, you haven't even read it so you just make an excuse and claim everything it contains is lies.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Another Theory of yours.Just like your supposed string theory that you posted. Or is it an invention of yours. Just like the Theory of Everything. Please if you have any PROOF please post it. Truly, the SCRIPTURE says that you are 1:29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity, whisperers Once again it sounds good in theory. But it is another LIE!
By the way, quoting "evolutionists" to support your creationism is like pointing a grenade at someone, and threatening to shoot. Sure, there is a bang when it goes off, but it blows up in your face, every time. Also, isn't bearing false witness a sin? The way you do it, one would swear that it was a duty.
You make the mistake of asking the wrong question. It would be more intellectually honest to ask how did they get their special properties? If there is a who, the evidence will show it. So far, in every matter, who has not been a part of any explanation for nature.
Our laws we not set by the creator. The Bible says a man must pay 50 pieces of silver to his rape victim's father so he can marry her. It also calls for the stoning of adulterers, naughty children and anyone who works on the sabbath. None of these practices are observed in our laws.
@DRR180 Give me an example. As for them laws they have always been there since there were set by the CREATOR. If you read into the second LAW of Thermodynamics. You would learn that they would have to been perfect when the came about. TRY BETTER!
@DRR180 Are you that foolish that you are stupid enough to say something like that. That the human race does not kill and steal. Especially, those that believe in the evolution LIE. Truly the book of Romans says that you are liars and deceivers. You are your own worst enemy.
"...kill and steal. Especially those that believe..."
Actually, on the average, the believers in a god tend to do more stealing and killing than non-believers. Disproportionately so, too. Or, is the DOJ in on this atheist conspiracy too?
@MultiYahoo22: Your point was that God gave us morality; my point is that morality is a biproduct of evolution and is imperfect. In general, we don't kill and steal, but since evolution is a flawed process, there are abnormalities.
Again, you say that you've sent the info. What fucking info did you send? Through what medium? The reply button in comments? If so, you've failed to do that. Through PM's? If so, why haven't I received anything? Profile comments? If so, why haven't I seen anything on my profile? How are you sending it? Smoke signal? ESP? Carrier pigeon? Singing telegram?
I have gone to the museum. All I seen it was distinct species. NO evolving species. NO transition species either. As for the frameshift mutation. Is it amother revised revision. Since, that is all you can do to prove a LIE. I will respond to them. I will blog them since you only respond when it is convenient for you. No other alternative other than creation.
What were you expecting to find? Seriously, did you even get past the fourth grade?
"transition species"
Wrong! All species are transitional species.
"No other alternative"
As I have done before, there is a huge list of alternative explanations just waiting for their chance. The Abrahamic creation myth is merely one of thousands.
First, you stated that there was evidence. Now you state that you accept by faith. eventhough it is a LIE. All of our school textbooks claim that it has been proven. Including the the fossil evidence. I would hate to put my faith in liars. That constantly correcting themselves and bending the rules to prove a theory that SCRIPTURE calls a LIE. No, other choice. If you have please post it. I will prove it to be a LIE also.
"Anatomical similarities, geographical distribution of similar species and the fossil record indicate that all organisms are descended from a common ancestor through a long series of these divergence events, stretching back in a tree of life that has grown over the 3,500 million years of life on Earth."
@xlanciferionx Of course wolf can not do it. Because you spammed them. I guess you do not like what is TRUE. So, you have to spam in order to hide your inability to prove your evolution theory. The SCRIPTURE does say that you are malignant. It also says that I will curse that curse you. You will see this very soon in your own life. I will no longer waste my time with a childish person.
1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts o f their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves 1:25 who changed the truth of God into lie and worshipped, and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature
1:20 For the invisible things of HIM from creation of the world are CLEARLY seen, being understood by the things that are made even HIS eternal power and GODHEAD; so that they are WITHOUT EXCUSE 1:21 Because, that when they knew God they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful; but became VAIN in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools
Like I told you before. Tides and Winds are going to change. Unfortunately, it will not be good for you. At present the people are blinded by the media and the LIES that are fed to them. But, just like people are tired of pedophiles hurting and raping young children. They will get tired of your immorality. Especially, when the country is attacked by terrorist. They, will seek answers. You will be the first scapgoats of the fanatics.
They are changing. The change tends to favor a move away from a tide of religious politics.
"tired of pedophiles..."
They've generally been against that sort of thing. Only rare societies had, or have no real taboos against it. The Israelites were one of them, as Numbers 31 shows.
"attacked by terrorist"
I'm sure that will only align people against whatever nationality those terrorists tend to be. One only need look at recent history for that one.
@xlanciferionx Once, again I have also read that entire Chapter. I also have failed to read the word rape in the verses. Apparently, you have a fascination with the word rape. Why, not post the verse and be honest for a change. The SCRIPTURE does say that you are LIARS. Anything to meet your agenda.
Again, what other reasons exist to save for yourself every girl that has not slept with a man, when you have just killed all of the boys, and killed every woman that has slept with a man? Mind you, this is after killing all of the men.
"Why, not post the verse"
Because you have a bible. You can read it
for yourself. If you've "read that entire Chapter," then why should I even need to bother with posting the verse?
So, then, what the hell are gay bashing, fag bashing, or any other epithet for the deliberate assault upon those deemed to be homosexuals? Why are the very words used to describe them given negative connotations?
Sure, nobody is demoralizing them. Beating them? Hurling their hateful labels at them? Sure, but hey! That isn't demoralizing. Boys will be boys? Even until they are well into adulthood, eh?
@xlanciferionx The only people that demoralize you is yourself. All you have to do google it. Gays disrupt churches. You are your own worse enemy. Just like you reacted to wolf by that foul langauge. That shows your true nature. Of course you know that they couldnot respond. HOW CLEVER! Let the LORD show no mercy towards you for cursing somebody that was respectful towards you. "I will curse them that curse you." Starting this moment you will cursed.
I am posting this in an attempt to expaling to those that are trapped in homosexuality. I do not do this because I hate you. I am not mocking you either. Romans 1:18 For the wrath of God is REVEALED from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the TRUTH in unrighteousness; 1:19 Because that which maybe known of God is MANIFEST in them; for God hath shewed it unto them
1:21 Because, that when they knew God they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful; but became VAIN in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools 1:23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man, and to birds, and four footed beasts, and creeping things
I already responded. But, I will do it again.Freshly killed seals have been dated at 1300 years. This means they are supposed to have died over a millennium ago. Other seals which have been dead no longer than 30 years were dated at 4600 years (W. Dort, Mummified Seals of Southern Victoria Land, in Antarctica Journal of the U.S., June 1971, pg.210(evolutionist)
Anomolies are ot reliable. It is a scientific FACT. That when you can not depend on the same test to get you reliable info. Then it should not be used at all. They is another more accurate method. But, the evolutionists are afraid to use it. Due, to the FACT that it does not meet their standard. It is called NEW Accelerator Mass Spectrometer Technique. I hope that this into has assisted you. Thanks!
@Derek2722 The problems of the radiocarbon dating method are undeniably deep and seriousIt should be no surprise, then, that fully half of the dates are rejected. (I WONDER WHY) The wonder is surely, that the remaining half come to be accepted. Evolutionist R.E. Lee, Radiocarbon Ages in Error, in Anthropological Journal of Canada, March 3, 1981, pg.9 parenthesis are mine
this is an example of evolution, you must acknowledge or you show your ignorance.
the Staph Infection has become Adapted to to Penicillin, so ridiculously much that a new species was created with almost all of its DNA completely different, this was called the MRSA infection which is 100% immune to Penicillin.
evolution, from Staphylococcus infection which evolved into the Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection.
Various living mollusk (such as snails) had their shells dated, and were found to have died as much as 2,300 years ago (M. Keith and G. Anderson, Radiocarbon dating: Fictitious results with Mollusk Shells, in Science, 141, 1963, pg.634 It is just some examples of the inaccuracy of Carbon 14 Dating.
No. Carbon 14 dating is quite accurate up to 60,000 years. It is when it is done improperly that it becomes inaccurate. So, as is usually the case with technological failures, it's a user error; wetware issue; general incompetency of the operator. Claiming that Carbon 14 dating is inaccurate is like claiming a Sig Sauer is inaccurate, as opposed to the person that is inaccurate.
@xlanciferionx The problems of the radiocarbon dating method are undeniably deep and seriousIt should be no surprise, then, that fully half of the dates are rejected. (I WONDER WHY) The wonder is surely, that the remaining half come to be accepted. Evolutionist R.E. Lee, Radiocarbon Ages in Error, in Anthropological Journal of Canada, March 3, 1981, pg.9 parenthesis are mine
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD The problems of the radiocarbon dating method are undeniably deep and seriousIt should be no surprise, then, that fully half of the dates are rejected. (I WONDER WHY) The wonder is surely, that the remaining half come to be accepted. Evolutionist R.E. Lee, Radiocarbon Ages in Error, in Anthropological Journal of Canada, March 3, 1981, pg.9 parenthesis are mine. Neverthless, I am going to google it to prove you wrong.
Again, 1981. One man's opinion does not equate to a refutation of the accuracy of Carbon-14 dating. Do you honestly believe that science has not made any further advancements since the mid 1980's?
Also, why do you keep avoiding the question regarding flavobacterium K172? Why do you avoid presenting evidence FOR creation? Why do you avoid any of my serious questions? Are you THAT cowardly?
@xlanciferionx The only people that are cowardly are those that spam people. In order to make them look like fools. The Scripture does say that professing to be wise have become foolish. I am speaking for wolf.
I agree. That is partly why I do not mark posts as spam, unless they are advertisements. I also think its funny to let the insane be heard. After all, if you don't make an ass of yourself, I can't point it out.
"speaking for wolf"
What a coincidence! You both have the same poor English skills, random capitalization fetish, and phrasing. Whatever, wolfie.
@xlanciferionx I thought you did not spam. Another, LIE look at below. You have have your name. Are you going to deny that also? Yet, you are supposed to be trustworthy. But, the SCRIPTURE does say that you are LIARS.
Again, I gave you the explicit reasons that I use for marking posts as spam. Your posts, wolfie, do not fit that very narrow standard that I use. And, I'm pretty sure that I know whether or not I've done something. What evidence do you have that I've marked your posts as spam? Why would I do that now, when I could have done it a long time ago? Or, much like always, are you just speculating?
Evidence that supports your brand of creation, and not quotes from works that you have not read.
Evidence that your god even exists (this may help with your creation evidence).
And finally, how it is moral for a god to call for the murder of women and children, as well as the rape of little girls.
Feel free to address these red herrings that you brought up, since I know you've given up on arguing against the granting of basic human rights to homosexual humans.
Immorality is not a basic human right. That is why SODOM and Sparta fdo not exist. You might want to believe it. In order for you to continue your immoral life. If it is not immoral why legalize it. Do we legalize murder and rape. How would I post if I have not read.
he continuously ignores facts or questions and preaches his "normalcy" that everyone should abide by, because anything that isn't like him or doesn't believe the same things he does makes them not normal and liars.
@xlanciferionx Immorality is not a human right. In that case rape, murder, pedophile and torture would be. Feel free to compare apples and oranges like wolf told you. Comparing being oriental or hadicapped as immoral. Nowhere, in SCRIPTURE does it state that. But, like they said anything to meet your agenda. I guess your lack of proof for immorality has you comparing apples and oranges.
The funny part is, you honestly think that these are comparable to two consenting people of the same sex engaging in sexual relations. And, you call my comparison of norms apples and oranges.
Again, wolfie, how is homosexuality immoral? Be specific.
@xlanciferionx Once, again you are fascinated with rape. You must have a pyschological problem. I do not know personally what might have happened to you. But, get over it. I know it is not easy. IT DOES NOT SAY THAT. After, wolf read it I read it. But, anything to excuse immorality. Oh, they supposed did it. since, when you do hear a heterosexual coming out with excuses for immorality. Or better yet misquoting SCRIPTURE to meet their agenda.
Again, what other reason is there to save every girl that has not slept with a man, after you have killed every boy, and every woman that has slept with a man, after executing every man? Slaves? If so, why not kill those that rebel against the
enslavement? Grooming them to be your
bride? Yeah, like she'd be willing, after watching you kill her family. Some odd form of adoption? Then, why kill all the boys?
"I suspect that the sun is 4.5 billion years old. However, given some new and unexpected results to the contrary, and some time for frantic recalculation and theoretical readjustment, I suspect that we could live with Bishop Ussher's value for the age of the Earth and Sun. [4004 B.C.] I don't think we have much in the way of observational evidence in astronomy to conflict with that.''—*John Eddy, Geotimes (1978) (italics ours). (evolutionist) Before you comment please seek the correct info.
You know nothing of my life, yet you judge (a sin) it immoral.
The facts is, if you believe the earth is 6,000 years old, evolution is a lie and man coexisted with dinosaurs, you're problems are bigger than the legalization of gay marriage. If I were you, I would get off youtube and seek professional help.
@DRR180 No, I do not but the Scripture does. As for you you no nothing of my life but you called me a fascist for telling you what is TRUE. The bigger problem is that you deny the Creator like the SCRIPTURE. And you continue to live an immoral life.
@DRR180 I guess you have no proof for evolution. So, you have to resort to calling childish and foolish games of calling people names. And you supposed to be an example. HOW SAD!
@DRR180 I say the same of you. You call me a fascist. Then you do not give me an opportunity to respond. The FACT is that homosexuality is immoral because the SCRIPTURE states it. If you want to debate fair. Stop playing your childish foolishness. After, all it is not immoral. Then what are you afraid of.
@MultiYahoo22 I never called you a fascist. I've never even seen you on here. The scripture is not the be all that ends all in our society. You can't impose the rules of scripture on people who don't believe in your God or people who interpret the scripture differently.
*A. Holmes in 1947 declared it to be 3.35 billion (3,350,000,000; and said in 1956, he raised it to 4.5 billion (4,500,000,000). Just now, the age of the earth stands at about 5 billion years. Pretty soon, someone will raise it again. WHAT WILL IT BE NEXT TIME?
The beauty of science is that it doesn't attempt to claim to have all the answers. It is an ever changing subject. The point is; the Earth is really old.
PROVE IT! So far all it has been is rhetoric and talk. But, no FACTS. Surely, science should come up with some proof of the age of the earth. Instead of changing constantly. When it does not meet their theory?
Yes. As our technology improves, our ability to accurately obtain the date of the Earth will lead to revised estimates. Ignoring more accurate information to hold onto previously held notions is the purview of religion, not science.
yes we do, we have radio carbon dating and the recent finds in 2008 of a huge farm of rocks in Quebec found that these rocks are over 4.5 billion years old based on their carbon half lives which is radio carbon dating to summarize it.
The mercury found from volcanic material are on a specific half life which has been increasing because they keep finding more and more mercury with different half lifes.
No, I am not dense I believe in reality. I would rather believe in that date than your evolutionists continually updating your supposed ageIn 1862 *Thompson said the earth was 20 million years old. Thirty-five years later in 1897, he doubled it to 40 million. Two years later, *J.Joly said it was 90 million. * Rayleigh, in 1921, said the earth has been here for 1 billion years. Eleven years later, * W.O. Hotchkiss moved the figure up to 1.6 billion (1,600,0000,000).
First, I am not quoting saying that. Second, the Ark does exist. That is has been found is another issue. Besides there is enough evidence that evolution is a LIE. That you do not need to find it anyways.
I am honest the only liers are you. Did I say that it was found. NO! I did say that it exist. But, you afre so ready to jump to a conclusion. Maybe, you ought to slow down and read the post.
It has been witnessed. In the lab, and in the wild. By all means, prove how evolution is NOT the best explanation for something like nylonase, or radiotrophic fungi.
Are you that foolish? Or are you hiding your head in the sand. Due, to the FACT that it is inconvenient for you. The fossil evidence is a LIE, the mutation evidence is a LIE. What more LIES would you LIKE? Your ape theory another LIE. I believe your 11 year old niece could read into that. Maybe, not you. Your niece can. What other LIES would you like to show you? Show me a LIE! You TALK to much. STICK to BIBLICAL FACTS not some fable or theory that you heard.
What EXCUSES am I using? Please, reveal them. What supposed facts am I accomodating. Please, bring them to my attention. Other, than that stop the talking.
You think the entire universe was created after what all archaelogists call the agricultural revolution, all because scientists didn't estimate the age of the Earth correctly on their first try. The first people to guess the circumference of the Earth were way off too, but that doesn't mean every subsequent guess is wrong too. You've allowed yourself to abandon all reason in favor of a bronze age myth.
You still did not explain how 240 billion galaxies exist. Are you saying thru the agricultural revolution. I just might have to look into that foolish theory.
LOOK AT SODOM. 28: Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought; they sold, they planted, they builded; 29: But the same day that Lot went out of SODOM it rained fire and brimestone from heaven, and destroyed them all.
Look at El Dorado! Look at Atlantis! Look at Niflheimr! Look at Mordor! We can look at imaginary lands at all day, but in the end, a myth is just a myth.
On the contrary I am not upset. I am still awaitng your fossil evidence. Your won scientists have said they do not have any. Are you smarter then them? Do you have some in your home? You have had 150 years to prove your fossil evidence. You have failed. "In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation."
what did u think would happen gays just roll over and play dead for u . we will fight and kill just like u have done for your rights!
mjm12670 10 months ago
what did u think would happen we will not be killed by your children anymore
mjm12670 10 months ago
OMG IF U ALL REALLY BELIEVE IN GOD THEN U KNOW HE TAKES CARE OF EVERYTHING ALL IN TIME NO NEED FOR U TO DO ANYTHING
mjm12670 10 months ago
There are effective ways to protest and disagree. This isn't one of them.
TVWriterGuy 1 year ago
we are supposed to be all gods children no matter what .is this not the case anymore ??????? gay or straight or transgender.the whole idea of religion is to keep people in order do these church people have first hand experience of god and the bible? it was written 1000 years after these so called events WERE THEY THERE NO.
mountford712 1 year ago
If you any serious for your supposed LIE! Post it. But, stop playing your childish games.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
I have made a rebuttal to everyone of your arguments and you have a failure to answer any of my questions.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
Comment removed
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Another LIE! You have not answered the simple FACT. That you deny that a CREATOR exist. Then you say that GOD only wants us to be happy. I am still waiting on your response. I know that you received it. But, the SCRIPTURE does say that you are deceivers and liars. When you have nothing all you is hide. By, not responding that is exactly what you aree doing. You are a very confused individual. Saying one thing that another thing.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
your scripture is full of holes, why does your god induct the genocide of the world's, from the holocaust to Stalin to the Armenian genocide, to the Rwandan genocide?
You haven't read the book of the theory, and you continue to say it is made of lies when you haven't ever read it.
A creator cannot exist as quantum mechanics says that everything must be interconnected and that there must be a cause to the effect
How about this Quantum mechanics says that anything unobserved changes its outcome
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD I already responded to this foolishness. But, I would like to add something to it. Who is feeding you this foolishness? Where does the BIBLE say that? When the blind lead the blind they both fall into the ditch. Especially, those that do not really care for you.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@xlanciferionx Because, he knows that he can not prove it. That reminds me of Charles Darwin and his foolish imagination in stating that a bear evolved into a whale. Just by seeing the bear catch some fish. Even evolutionist do not believe that.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
he said that a primitive bear evolved into a whale because:
These species share the exact same bone and arm structure:
Whales
Bats
Humans
Bears
Monkeys of all species
and birds of ALL species
now tell me, how do all these animals of total different species all have the same arm structure?
because they all have a common ancestor and evolved from them through their environment.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
I thought you were GAY ! It does not seem like it. I believe you are full of hatred and intolerance. Look at yourself!
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
There is nothing wrong with being gay, you're just a fascist because what ever isn't you, what you believe in or what violates your terms isn't acceptable in your world. Then you try to hate on them and get them to convert, which is the same fascism that Hitler used, and that Stalin used, you're no better than those genocidal freaks
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Then take up with the LORD of Heaven. Because that is what the Scripture states. I am only the messenger.How ironic when you have no valuable arguement you rely on calling persons names.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
Actually, there is more. But, I only used them as examples. There is also heterosexual examples. But, all originate from the same theory of evolution. If you believe that we came form apes. Then you can behave as as animal. Eventhough, animals do not do the things we do. Are we not supposed to be evolving?
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
no, humans have so ridiculously adapted ourselves to technology that we have no predator and we can live in almost every climate, so I guess Humans have evolved intelligence which makes them solve their problems.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Could it be that the LORD of Heaven told to rule back in the book of Genesis. Along with naming the animals once they were created. Why is it there murder, rape, theft, and liars? How have we resolved that problem? No amount of technology can take care of the sin problem. That is why Christ came to take care of. Eventhough, in the end is your choice. Once, again the LORD told to fill the planet.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
you keep quoting the bible and things, you cannot prove it without referring to it.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
Comment removed
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
oh really? like people don't kill other people and lions and sharks and crocodiles DON'T kill anything including their own species?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD I am sending you a couple of qoutes from evolutionists to prove that evolution opened the door to all kind of wickedness. "I am haunted by a conviction that the nihilistic philosophy which so-called educated opinion chose to adopt following the publication of the Origin of Species committed mankind to a course of automatic self-destruction. A doomsday was then set ticking."—*Sir Fred Hoyle, The Intelligent Universe (1983), p. 9. [Hoyle is a renowned British Astrophysicist.]
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
these quotes come out of the era where evolutionism and creationism were being debuted, please get some real currency
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD You mean after 100 years it is still being debated. HOW SAD! That after 100 years you are still confused and have no evidence for evolution. These are your own scientists speaking. You are your own worst enemy.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
science does not prove things because they must happen in real time that humans can experience to have it.
A theory is a Hypothesis, which is an educated guess based on logical data that ALWAYS COMES BACK TO THE EXACT SAME RESULT.
why cannot species adapt to their surroundings?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Then why do you claim that DNA supposedly proves evolution? I believe that you are confused. Are you saying that why cannot or why can? You said before that they can. Now you are saying they cannot. Are you that confused? HOW SAD!
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
You really ought to research before you post. IT sounds nice. But, that is it.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
It sounds good in theory. But, that is it. The FACT that the DNA can not be altered to create a new species.Who would alter it? There is a barrier in it.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
"FACT that the DNA can not be altered to create a new species"
You must be completely ignorant. Explain how flavobacterium K172 came about. Or, explain how hybridization does not do this very thing. Show me that mules do not exist.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
1 John 1:9 If we confess our sins, HE is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness
2 Peter 3:9 The LORD is not slack concerning HIS promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance
John 3:16 For GOD so loved the world, that HE gave HIS only begotten SON, that whosever believeth in HIM should not perish, but have everlasting life. THERE IS HOPE
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
God also said that we deserve to be happy in anyway fits us, in anyway shape or form.
God will love us still no matter what.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
Where does it say that? I have been reading the Scripture for 18 years and I have yet to find such foolishness. He does want you to be happy. That is a FACT but not while practicing immorality. In that case I would have been happy beofre I heard the gospeol. Are you not the same one that stated that the four gospel writers lived after the crucification of Christ. Who is telling you these lies? If that was the case. Why did HE destroy SODOM? Please! I do not hate you. Neither does the LORD.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD I am still waiting for the verse in SCRIPTURE that supposedly says that.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Then HE owes an apology to SODOM and GOMORRAH
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
@WOLF86ification
He would, if any of them existed.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD I am going to join wolf in their response. I am going to wait for your foolish response. If that is true than HE owes Sodom and me an apology. But, from what I observe it has been a week. I also thought that you said the GOD does not exist.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
You don't have to "join" wolfie, you are wolfie.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
, 1:32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
1:29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity, whisperers 1:30 backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents 1:31 without understanding, covenant breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful,
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature 1:27 and like also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another: men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their own error which was meet 1:28 and even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
Well you already do. In the belief of evolution. Fairy Tales that are LIES at that.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
A scientific theory is as accepted as a law. We have the gravitational theory, the theory of relativity, the atomic theory, etc, all of which are accepted because they have been tested and never yeilding different results. Evolution is no different.
DRR180 1 year ago 2
Whom set the laws of gravity and the atomic energy? Did they create themselves? Once again that goes contrary to the SECOND LAW OF THERMODYMANICS. Evolution is not a scientific FACT.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
"Whom set the laws..."
Who stole the cookie from the cookie jar?
"...SECOND LAW..."
DEMONSTRATE IT.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@xlanciferionx You are behaving like an eight year old foolisn little girl. Like wolf posted professing to be wise have become foolish. He already posted it. You can also google it. Unless, you are wiser than the scientists.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
"wiser than the scientists"
The scientists agree with me. The second law of thermodynamics is not broken, wolfie. If so, feel free to present specifically how.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@DRR180 You are going by LAWS that are set by the Creator. But, the evolution theory will never be proved by valid science. Considering the FACT that all your fossil claims failed. All your DNA claims failed. All your ape theory failed. What do you really have. It is sad that you have to rely on LIES to support your theory. Since, all this examples have been proven to be hoaxes and LIES. As for the proto-bird that has been metioned. It is another hoax.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
you have no proof your "creator" made these laws.
These laws are special to our dimension and there are 4 observed dimensions, and 7 other unobserved dimensions, and each has their special properties.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Than then gravity an inanimate taught to itself that it was going to change its nature. That would go contrary to the second Law of Thermodynamics. which your scientists state that it can not be done.Furthermore, the very existence of the Second Law - and other so-called "Laws of Nature" such as the Laws of gravity and motion - is in and of itself a powerful testament to the existence of God. .
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
"Than then gravity an inanimate taught to itself..."
Is English your first language, or a secondary?
Those "laws" are only our interpretation of what is. What evidence do you have that a creator set these "laws" forth? What evidence do you have to support your assertion that a creator exists?
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD While Man may author the particular wording of these Laws that we see in textbooks, or express them in logical systems of his own devising, these Laws were not created by Man. The metaphysical reality of these Laws is Universal and Man merely represents them in his writings. The existence of these Laws compels us to ask the rhetorical question: "How can there be Laws without a Lawgiver?" To which we reply: "There can't be." So if Man is not the Lawgiver, then who is?
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Who could have the Power and Authority to proclaim Laws that affect the entire Universe? The inescapable answer is: "God. That's who!"[Isaac Asimov in The Origin of the Universe in the ORIGINS: How the World Came to Be video series (PO Box 200, Gilbert AZ 85299 USA: Eden Communications, 1983).]
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
see the Theory of Everything.
You have no proof that god exists without using the bible
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD On the contrary look around at nature and creation. The speak of the CREATOR. Also look at the failure of the evolution theory. You have no other choice if you reject the LIE of evolution. As for the supposed Theory of Everything I am not going to waste my time with theories that are based on LIES.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
nature says nothing about creation of anything, nature is the ecosystem of species living together.
The theory of everything proves every single natural phenomenon in our 3rd dimension and 1 time dimension spectrum, you haven't even read it so you just make an excuse and claim everything it contains is lies.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Another Theory of yours.Just like your supposed string theory that you posted. Or is it an invention of yours. Just like the Theory of Everything. Please if you have any PROOF please post it. Truly, the SCRIPTURE says that you are 1:29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity, whisperers Once again it sounds good in theory. But it is another LIE!
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
They proved that Quarks exist, please explain to me how quarks do not exist inside subatomic particles?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD By, the way he is an evolutionists. Like I said you are your own worst enemy. You say that we are your enemy. I beg to differ.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that is irrelevant and now you're trying to flame me.
A theory is a Hypothesis, which is an educated guess based on logical data that ALWAYS COMES BACK TO THE EXACT SAME RESULT.
why cannot species adapt to their surroundings?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
"he is an evolutionists"
By the way, quoting "evolutionists" to support your creationism is like pointing a grenade at someone, and threatening to shoot. Sure, there is a bang when it goes off, but it blows up in your face, every time. Also, isn't bearing false witness a sin? The way you do it, one would swear that it was a duty.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
Also, I'm still waiting for the previously mentioned three items.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Who gave them their special properties?
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
You make the mistake of asking the wrong question. It would be more intellectually honest to ask how did they get their special properties? If there is a who, the evidence will show it. So far, in every matter, who has not been a part of any explanation for nature.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
Our laws we not set by the creator. The Bible says a man must pay 50 pieces of silver to his rape victim's father so he can marry her. It also calls for the stoning of adulterers, naughty children and anyone who works on the sabbath. None of these practices are observed in our laws.
DRR180 1 year ago
@DRR180 No, but it say that homosexuality is immoral in the book of Romans.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
but thats a book, which is old an un referable
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@DRR180 Give me an example. As for them laws they have always been there since there were set by the CREATOR. If you read into the second LAW of Thermodynamics. You would learn that they would have to been perfect when the came about. TRY BETTER!
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22 Evolution has a perfectly understandable explaination for why we don't kill and steal.
DRR180 1 year ago
@DRR180 You see when I make a mistake. I correct it and do not run from it. I misspelled explaination. You were correct.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
Bullshit. You run like a scared schoolgirl.
I'm still waiting for you to show how nylonase is not the product of a mutation.
I'm still waiting for evidence FOR creation.
I'm still waiting for an explanation of how it is moral for a god to call for the murder of women and children, and the rape of the surviving girls?
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@DRR180 Are you that foolish that you are stupid enough to say something like that. That the human race does not kill and steal. Especially, those that believe in the evolution LIE. Truly the book of Romans says that you are liars and deceivers. You are your own worst enemy.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
"...kill and steal. Especially those that believe..."
Actually, on the average, the believers in a god tend to do more stealing and killing than non-believers. Disproportionately so, too. Or, is the DOJ in on this atheist conspiracy too?
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22: Your point was that God gave us morality; my point is that morality is a biproduct of evolution and is imperfect. In general, we don't kill and steal, but since evolution is a flawed process, there are abnormalities.
DRR180 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
"have to been perfect"
It would not have to have been perfect. Where, in any variant of the second law of thermodynamics, does it state this? Be specific.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
I sent you the info but I guess that it is not convenient for you agenda. I will post it now for everybody could see it.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
Again, you say that you've sent the info. What fucking info did you send? Through what medium? The reply button in comments? If so, you've failed to do that. Through PM's? If so, why haven't I received anything? Profile comments? If so, why haven't I seen anything on my profile? How are you sending it? Smoke signal? ESP? Carrier pigeon? Singing telegram?
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
I have gone to the museum. All I seen it was distinct species. NO evolving species. NO transition species either. As for the frameshift mutation. Is it amother revised revision. Since, that is all you can do to prove a LIE. I will respond to them. I will blog them since you only respond when it is convenient for you. No other alternative other than creation.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
"distinct species"
What were you expecting to find? Seriously, did you even get past the fourth grade?
"transition species"
Wrong! All species are transitional species.
"No other alternative"
As I have done before, there is a huge list of alternative explanations just waiting for their chance. The Abrahamic creation myth is merely one of thousands.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
First, you stated that there was evidence. Now you state that you accept by faith. eventhough it is a LIE. All of our school textbooks claim that it has been proven. Including the the fossil evidence. I would hate to put my faith in liars. That constantly correcting themselves and bending the rules to prove a theory that SCRIPTURE calls a LIE. No, other choice. If you have please post it. I will prove it to be a LIE also.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
This has to be satiricle. There's no way a person like you can exist. Did you graduate fouth grade?
AceWilliams12 1 year ago
"you state that you accept by faith"
I'm with AceWilliams12. Did you graduate the fourth grade? Quote me on it.
"please post it" I gave you a chance to choose your own battle. Oh well! I'll post it in the next post.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
"Anatomical similarities, geographical distribution of similar species and the fossil record indicate that all organisms are descended from a common ancestor through a long series of these divergence events, stretching back in a tree of life that has grown over the 3,500 million years of life on Earth."
Feel free to disprove that.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@xlanciferionx Of course wolf can not do it. Because you spammed them. I guess you do not like what is TRUE. So, you have to spam in order to hide your inability to prove your evolution theory. The SCRIPTURE does say that you are malignant. It also says that I will curse that curse you. You will see this very soon in your own life. I will no longer waste my time with a childish person.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
"you spammed them"
Nope. I do not mark posts as spam, unless they are genuinely spam posts. My definition of spam posts is such:
Any post that is an advertisement for a website, service, or product.
Since your posts were not spam, I did not mark them as such. So, feel free to refute it.
"The SCRIPTURE...curse you"
Oh noez! I guess I'll take my chances.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts o f their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves 1:25 who changed the truth of God into lie and worshipped, and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
1:20 For the invisible things of HIM from creation of the world are CLEARLY seen, being understood by the things that are made even HIS eternal power and GODHEAD; so that they are WITHOUT EXCUSE 1:21 Because, that when they knew God they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful; but became VAIN in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
Like I told you before. Tides and Winds are going to change. Unfortunately, it will not be good for you. At present the people are blinded by the media and the LIES that are fed to them. But, just like people are tired of pedophiles hurting and raping young children. They will get tired of your immorality. Especially, when the country is attacked by terrorist. They, will seek answers. You will be the first scapgoats of the fanatics.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
"Tides and Winds"
They are changing. The change tends to favor a move away from a tide of religious politics.
"tired of pedophiles..."
They've generally been against that sort of thing. Only rare societies had, or have no real taboos against it. The Israelites were one of them, as Numbers 31 shows.
"attacked by terrorist"
I'm sure that will only align people against whatever nationality those terrorists tend to be. One only need look at recent history for that one.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@xlanciferionx Once, again I have also read that entire Chapter. I also have failed to read the word rape in the verses. Apparently, you have a fascination with the word rape. Why, not post the verse and be honest for a change. The SCRIPTURE does say that you are LIARS. Anything to meet your agenda.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
"failed to read the word rape"
Again, what other reasons exist to save for yourself every girl that has not slept with a man, when you have just killed all of the boys, and killed every woman that has slept with a man? Mind you, this is after killing all of the men.
"Why, not post the verse"
Because you have a bible. You can read it
for yourself. If you've "read that entire Chapter," then why should I even need to bother with posting the verse?
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
Nobody demoralizes them. They do good enough on their own. They do not need any help.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
So, then, what the hell are gay bashing, fag bashing, or any other epithet for the deliberate assault upon those deemed to be homosexuals? Why are the very words used to describe them given negative connotations?
Sure, nobody is demoralizing them. Beating them? Hurling their hateful labels at them? Sure, but hey! That isn't demoralizing. Boys will be boys? Even until they are well into adulthood, eh?
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@xlanciferionx The only people that demoralize you is yourself. All you have to do google it. Gays disrupt churches. You are your own worse enemy. Just like you reacted to wolf by that foul langauge. That shows your true nature. Of course you know that they couldnot respond. HOW CLEVER! Let the LORD show no mercy towards you for cursing somebody that was respectful towards you. "I will curse them that curse you." Starting this moment you will cursed.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
So, you are saying that beating people, hurling words of hatred at them, and killing them is not demoralizing them? By all means, define the term.
"Starting this moment you will cursed"
I will "cursed" what?
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
I am posting this in an attempt to expaling to those that are trapped in homosexuality. I do not do this because I hate you. I am not mocking you either. Romans 1:18 For the wrath of God is REVEALED from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the TRUTH in unrighteousness; 1:19 Because that which maybe known of God is MANIFEST in them; for God hath shewed it unto them
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
1:21 Because, that when they knew God they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful; but became VAIN in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools 1:23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man, and to birds, and four footed beasts, and creeping things
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
That is also the reaosn that he left the CHURCH free to preach the SCRIPTURES. Emperor Constantine change of the Sabbath to Sunday dies solis, a
name which could not offend the ears of his pagan subjects(note 2)pg.250
Constantine non-conversion and aruspicespg.250
But the devotion of Constantine was .sunpg.251
Edward Gibbon Volume II The Rise and the Fall of the Roman Empire
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
No, the flying spaghetti monster who lives in the sky does not exist.
and you have no proof.
please explain to my your story about how radio carbon dating is wrong and the earth is only 6000 years old?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
I already responded. But, I will do it again.Freshly killed seals have been dated at 1300 years. This means they are supposed to have died over a millennium ago. Other seals which have been dead no longer than 30 years were dated at 4600 years (W. Dort, Mummified Seals of Southern Victoria Land, in Antarctica Journal of the U.S., June 1971, pg.210(evolutionist)
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
You're pointing out anomolies. No system is perfect, but carbon 14 dating is close to it.
Derek2722 1 year ago
Anomolies are ot reliable. It is a scientific FACT. That when you can not depend on the same test to get you reliable info. Then it should not be used at all. They is another more accurate method. But, the evolutionists are afraid to use it. Due, to the FACT that it does not meet their standard. It is called NEW Accelerator Mass Spectrometer Technique. I hope that this into has assisted you. Thanks!
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
@Derek2722 The problems of the radiocarbon dating method are undeniably deep and seriousIt should be no surprise, then, that fully half of the dates are rejected. (I WONDER WHY) The wonder is surely, that the remaining half come to be accepted. Evolutionist R.E. Lee, Radiocarbon Ages in Error, in Anthropological Journal of Canada, March 3, 1981, pg.9 parenthesis are mine
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
this is an example of evolution, you must acknowledge or you show your ignorance.
the Staph Infection has become Adapted to to Penicillin, so ridiculously much that a new species was created with almost all of its DNA completely different, this was called the MRSA infection which is 100% immune to Penicillin.
evolution, from Staphylococcus infection which evolved into the Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD I really hope that you blog back. That way it will appear.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
Various living mollusk (such as snails) had their shells dated, and were found to have died as much as 2,300 years ago (M. Keith and G. Anderson, Radiocarbon dating: Fictitious results with Mollusk Shells, in Science, 141, 1963, pg.634 It is just some examples of the inaccuracy of Carbon 14 Dating.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
No. Carbon 14 dating is quite accurate up to 60,000 years. It is when it is done improperly that it becomes inaccurate. So, as is usually the case with technological failures, it's a user error; wetware issue; general incompetency of the operator. Claiming that Carbon 14 dating is inaccurate is like claiming a Sig Sauer is inaccurate, as opposed to the person that is inaccurate.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xlanciferionx The problems of the radiocarbon dating method are undeniably deep and seriousIt should be no surprise, then, that fully half of the dates are rejected. (I WONDER WHY) The wonder is surely, that the remaining half come to be accepted. Evolutionist R.E. Lee, Radiocarbon Ages in Error, in Anthropological Journal of Canada, March 3, 1981, pg.9 parenthesis are mine
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
they only reject them in order to find multiple results of the same value, building consistency.
and the reject rate depends on the material and the samples taken.
and your quote is from 1981, it has solidified since 1995 and now has a 99.99% correct rate
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD The problems of the radiocarbon dating method are undeniably deep and seriousIt should be no surprise, then, that fully half of the dates are rejected. (I WONDER WHY) The wonder is surely, that the remaining half come to be accepted. Evolutionist R.E. Lee, Radiocarbon Ages in Error, in Anthropological Journal of Canada, March 3, 1981, pg.9 parenthesis are mine. Neverthless, I am going to google it to prove you wrong.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
Repeating the same outdated quotes does not refute the fact that they are outdated.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
Again, 1981. One man's opinion does not equate to a refutation of the accuracy of Carbon-14 dating. Do you honestly believe that science has not made any further advancements since the mid 1980's?
Also, why do you keep avoiding the question regarding flavobacterium K172? Why do you avoid presenting evidence FOR creation? Why do you avoid any of my serious questions? Are you THAT cowardly?
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
there is no evidence that supports creationism.
you somehow think that animals do NOT adapt to survive.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
scratch that, I though you were that wolf89
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@xlanciferionx The only people that are cowardly are those that spam people. In order to make them look like fools. The Scripture does say that professing to be wise have become foolish. I am speaking for wolf.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
"those that spam people"
I agree. That is partly why I do not mark posts as spam, unless they are advertisements. I also think its funny to let the insane be heard. After all, if you don't make an ass of yourself, I can't point it out.
"speaking for wolf"
What a coincidence! You both have the same poor English skills, random capitalization fetish, and phrasing. Whatever, wolfie.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@xlanciferionx I thought you did not spam. Another, LIE look at below. You have have your name. Are you going to deny that also? Yet, you are supposed to be trustworthy. But, the SCRIPTURE does say that you are LIARS.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
your scripture is out of the scope of the argument with no proof.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
Again, I gave you the explicit reasons that I use for marking posts as spam. Your posts, wolfie, do not fit that very narrow standard that I use. And, I'm pretty sure that I know whether or not I've done something. What evidence do you have that I've marked your posts as spam? Why would I do that now, when I could have done it a long time ago? Or, much like always, are you just speculating?
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
Also, I'm still waiting for:
Evidence that supports your brand of creation, and not quotes from works that you have not read.
Evidence that your god even exists (this may help with your creation evidence).
And finally, how it is moral for a god to call for the murder of women and children, as well as the rape of little girls.
Feel free to address these red herrings that you brought up, since I know you've given up on arguing against the granting of basic human rights to homosexual humans.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
Immorality is not a basic human right. That is why SODOM and Sparta fdo not exist. You might want to believe it. In order for you to continue your immoral life. If it is not immoral why legalize it. Do we legalize murder and rape. How would I post if I have not read.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
"SODOM"
Or, Sodom could have never existed. Again, what evidence is there for Sodom's existence?
"Sparta"
No. Sparta still survives to this day. The culture has changed, as do all cultures, but it is still there today. Even the language has survived.
"If it is not immoral why legalize it"
The funny part is, it is already legal. Now, they just want the rights that go along with it.
"How would I post if I have not read"
Visit creationist/anti-gay website, copy, then paste. You do this.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evidence that supports your brand of creation, and not quotes from works that you have not read.
Evidence that your god even exists (this may help with your creation evidence).
And finally, how it is moral for a god to call for the murder of women and children, as well as the rape of little girls.
Whenever you're ready. Go ahead, take your time. Remember:
read, think, write, read, post!
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
he continuously ignores facts or questions and preaches his "normalcy" that everyone should abide by, because anything that isn't like him or doesn't believe the same things he does makes them not normal and liars.
He's a fascist.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
Oh, I know. He has no justifications, so it's fun to rub it in.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@xlanciferionx Immorality is not a human right. In that case rape, murder, pedophile and torture would be. Feel free to compare apples and oranges like wolf told you. Comparing being oriental or hadicapped as immoral. Nowhere, in SCRIPTURE does it state that. But, like they said anything to meet your agenda. I guess your lack of proof for immorality has you comparing apples and oranges.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
"rape, murder, pedophile and torture"
The funny part is, you honestly think that these are comparable to two consenting people of the same sex engaging in sexual relations. And, you call my comparison of norms apples and oranges.
Again, wolfie, how is homosexuality immoral? Be specific.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@xlanciferionx Once, again you are fascinated with rape. You must have a pyschological problem. I do not know personally what might have happened to you. But, get over it. I know it is not easy. IT DOES NOT SAY THAT. After, wolf read it I read it. But, anything to excuse immorality. Oh, they supposed did it. since, when you do hear a heterosexual coming out with excuses for immorality. Or better yet misquoting SCRIPTURE to meet their agenda.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22
Again, what other reason is there to save every girl that has not slept with a man, after you have killed every boy, and every woman that has slept with a man, after executing every man? Slaves? If so, why not kill those that rebel against the
enslavement? Grooming them to be your
bride? Yeah, like she'd be willing, after watching you kill her family. Some odd form of adoption? Then, why kill all the boys?
What reason?
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
"I suspect that the sun is 4.5 billion years old. However, given some new and unexpected results to the contrary, and some time for frantic recalculation and theoretical readjustment, I suspect that we could live with Bishop Ussher's value for the age of the Earth and Sun. [4004 B.C.] I don't think we have much in the way of observational evidence in astronomy to conflict with that.''—*John Eddy, Geotimes (1978) (italics ours). (evolutionist) Before you comment please seek the correct info.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
I don't think you understand that quotations mean nothing. I could say anything I want, that doesn't make it true.
DRR180 1 year ago
Only when it is not convenient for someone. You see in the book of Romans the il effect of evolution. Describing homosexuality 2,000 years ago.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
@DRR180 Of course not. Because, you desire to continue in your immoral life. Even your own evolutionist scientists are quoted.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
You know nothing of my life, yet you judge (a sin) it immoral.
The facts is, if you believe the earth is 6,000 years old, evolution is a lie and man coexisted with dinosaurs, you're problems are bigger than the legalization of gay marriage. If I were you, I would get off youtube and seek professional help.
DRR180 1 year ago
@DRR180 No, I do not but the Scripture does. As for you you no nothing of my life but you called me a fascist for telling you what is TRUE. The bigger problem is that you deny the Creator like the SCRIPTURE. And you continue to live an immoral life.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
When did I call you a fascist? When you realize that you reject all other God's conceived by man, you'll realize why I reject yours.
DRR180 1 year ago
@DRR180 I guess you have no proof for evolution. So, you have to resort to calling childish and foolish games of calling people names. And you supposed to be an example. HOW SAD!
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@DRR180 I say the same of you. You call me a fascist. Then you do not give me an opportunity to respond. The FACT is that homosexuality is immoral because the SCRIPTURE states it. If you want to debate fair. Stop playing your childish foolishness. After, all it is not immoral. Then what are you afraid of.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
@MultiYahoo22 I never called you a fascist. I've never even seen you on here. The scripture is not the be all that ends all in our society. You can't impose the rules of scripture on people who don't believe in your God or people who interpret the scripture differently.
DRR180 1 year ago
*A. Holmes in 1947 declared it to be 3.35 billion (3,350,000,000; and said in 1956, he raised it to 4.5 billion (4,500,000,000). Just now, the age of the earth stands at about 5 billion years. Pretty soon, someone will raise it again. WHAT WILL IT BE NEXT TIME?
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
The beauty of science is that it doesn't attempt to claim to have all the answers. It is an ever changing subject. The point is; the Earth is really old.
DRR180 1 year ago
PROVE IT! So far all it has been is rhetoric and talk. But, no FACTS. Surely, science should come up with some proof of the age of the earth. Instead of changing constantly. When it does not meet their theory?
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
Yes. As our technology improves, our ability to accurately obtain the date of the Earth will lead to revised estimates. Ignoring more accurate information to hold onto previously held notions is the purview of religion, not science.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
The FACT is that you have no PROOF of the Age of the Earth. All you have is rhetoric and talk. Surely, science can finally give you a fixed date.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
yes we do, we have radio carbon dating and the recent finds in 2008 of a huge farm of rocks in Quebec found that these rocks are over 4.5 billion years old based on their carbon half lives which is radio carbon dating to summarize it.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@xlanciferionx Another excuse.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
No. It IS reasonable to accept more accurate information. That is not debatable, unless you are retarded.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
The mercury found from volcanic material are on a specific half life which has been increasing because they keep finding more and more mercury with different half lifes.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Anything, to meet your agenda.
MultiYahoo22 1 year ago
No, I am not dense I believe in reality. I would rather believe in that date than your evolutionists continually updating your supposed ageIn 1862 *Thompson said the earth was 20 million years old. Thirty-five years later in 1897, he doubled it to 40 million. Two years later, *J.Joly said it was 90 million. * Rayleigh, in 1921, said the earth has been here for 1 billion years. Eleven years later, * W.O. Hotchkiss moved the figure up to 1.6 billion (1,600,0000,000).
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
So language reminds me of a person that has no real evidence for their theory. No real evidence no thoery. A LIE +A LIE = A LIE
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
First, I am not quoting saying that. Second, the Ark does exist. That is has been found is another issue. Besides there is enough evidence that evolution is a LIE. That you do not need to find it anyways.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
The ark has not been found. That is a complete lie.
DRR180 1 year ago
The Ark has never been found. Try being honest for a change.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
I am honest the only liers are you. Did I say that it was found. NO! I did say that it exist. But, you afre so ready to jump to a conclusion. Maybe, you ought to slow down and read the post.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
Your blatant denial of facts would be humorous if you weren't serious.
Derek2722 1 year ago
"I did say that it exist"
So, then it has been found? If it hasn't been found, how can you honestly say that it exists?
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
@xlanciferionx If your evolution theory has not been proven. HOW CAN YOU SEE IT IS REAL. Especially, after the FACT that it full of lies and hoaxes.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
Refer to the Staph and MRSA infection.
Staph infection is killed by Penicillin, MRSA is immune to Penicillin and that means it EVOLVED from Staph
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 1 year ago
It has been witnessed. In the lab, and in the wild. By all means, prove how evolution is NOT the best explanation for something like nylonase, or radiotrophic fungi.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
Are you that foolish? Or are you hiding your head in the sand. Due, to the FACT that it is inconvenient for you. The fossil evidence is a LIE, the mutation evidence is a LIE. What more LIES would you LIKE? Your ape theory another LIE. I believe your 11 year old niece could read into that. Maybe, not you. Your niece can. What other LIES would you like to show you? Show me a LIE! You TALK to much. STICK to BIBLICAL FACTS not some fable or theory that you heard.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
You sure make a lot of excuses and ignore a lot of facts to accomodate your religion.
DRR180 1 year ago
What EXCUSES am I using? Please, reveal them. What supposed facts am I accomodating. Please, bring them to my attention. Other, than that stop the talking.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
You think the entire universe was created after what all archaelogists call the agricultural revolution, all because scientists didn't estimate the age of the Earth correctly on their first try. The first people to guess the circumference of the Earth were way off too, but that doesn't mean every subsequent guess is wrong too. You've allowed yourself to abandon all reason in favor of a bronze age myth.
DRR180 1 year ago
You still did not explain how 240 billion galaxies exist. Are you saying thru the agricultural revolution. I just might have to look into that foolish theory.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
"fossil evidence"
Fossils, on their own, are not so great. It is when comparative biology and radioactive dating are applied that fossils are of any use.
"mutation evidence"
Then, by all means refute the evolution of the flavobacterium K172's production of nylonase.
"ape theory"
Really? Homo Sapiens are not apes? Oh, by all means, explain what Hominidae are, and tell me that homo sapiens do not fit into that category.
"STICK to BIBLICAL FACTS"
That would be a short list indeed.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
LOOK AT SODOM. 28: Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought; they sold, they planted, they builded; 29: But the same day that Lot went out of SODOM it rained fire and brimestone from heaven, and destroyed them all.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
"LOOK AT SODOM"
Look at El Dorado! Look at Atlantis! Look at Niflheimr! Look at Mordor! We can look at imaginary lands at all day, but in the end, a myth is just a myth.
xlanciferionx 1 year ago
*Mark Ridley, "Who Doubts Evolution?" in New Scientist, June 25, 1981, p. 831.
WOLF86ification 1 year ago
On the contrary I am not upset. I am still awaitng your fossil evidence. Your won scientists have said they do not have any. Are you smarter then them? Do you have some in your home? You have had 150 years to prove your fossil evidence. You have failed. "In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation."
WOLF86ification