Learn the Basics of Handwriting Analysis : Understand Writing Strokes in Handwriting Analysis

[ObeyBunny]

I can't see anything beyond that huge caption box. Can you please re-edit your video so that the text box only appears for a few seconds at either the begining or the end of the video?

thanks.

[Rossdhu16]

No, no, no. on beginning strokes. Following through strokes are the crossing of the T's , where and how far. I do not know where you received you training.

[eatfats]

its just diffrent styles

this lady has no idea what shes talking about

expert village... holla @ me!

[Irisheyes77christy]

I don't have good follow through, but I do have those long e's. =)

[Irisheyes77christy]

..but I do have lofty ideas, lol.

[OTTUA]

im just here coz i read the game!!!

[FireCrossX]

HAHAHAHAHA SAME!!! OMG!!!

[coconutbombshell]

i was about to dignify you with a thought out response, but judging your intelligence from your last comment. it obviously isn't worth it.

[coconutbombshell]

this is an incredibly interesting subject! i never realized all the different forms of sience and art in these types of things until now

[KemaTheAtheist]

"this is an incredibly interesting subject! i never realized all the different forms of sience and art in these types of things until now "

There is none. It's complete bunk. There is no link between personality and handwriting in the brain. Otherwise stroke and/or accident victims who lose the ability to write would also have to have a change in personality, and vice versa.

This is as much "science" as astrology or homeopathic medicine. It's bullshit.

[jameshaines]

That argument makes no sense!

Your comparison with trying to analyse the writing of accident or stroke victims is like saying:

"We can never tell anything from people's body language, as if someone's paralysed from the neck down then it can no longer apply"

Do you think that's a good argument?

Just because you can find instances where something can't apply, does that mean it can never apply at all? That's what you're saying.

[KemaTheAtheist]

James, graphology is based on the premise that personality affects writing style. The two things would therefore must be linked in the brain. So, if you had a stroke and or were in a car crash or something that caused brain damage that caused the loss of ability to write, your personality would have to show a change as well, and vice versa.

The fact we know that people can lose the ability to write without a personality change proves the two are NOT linked.

[jameshaines]

!!!

Body language is based on the premise that feelings affect physical posture.

The two things would? therefore be linked in the brain. So, if you had a stroke and or were in a car crash or something that caused brain damage that caused the loss of ability to move your body, your feelings would have to show a change as well, and vice versa.

The fact we know that people can lose the ability to move without an emotional change proves the two are NOT linked.

Good logic? It's your own

[KemaTheAtheist]

Body language is based on the way you're feeling at the time. It's easy to see if someone is nervous, frustrated, etc.

You can look at handwriting and see if it's rushed or something like that... how someone is at the time. That's not what graphology does. Graphology tries to say "this person is an outgoing, confident, will get the job done..." Those are attributes that can NOT be seen in something as subjective as penmanship.

It's completely different.

[jameshaines]

Why is it different in a way that is signficant?

The point was is that we know that one can physically convey emotional states. Just because this doesn't ALWAYS apply, that doesn't mean that it NEVER applies - it just means that you have found exceptions.

Similarly, there is no logic in saying 'I have found an exception where due to some (dramatic) physical change, writing analysis couldn't apply, and that means it can never apply at all in any instance!'

It's a simple point.