if you are fluent in both french and english. comme c'est mon cas (like I am). and you watched the Foucault - Chomsky debate then you would realize that his system of thought was more solid and that of a genius than Chomsky's which is great too in his own right. In fact if you listen to recent discourse by Chomsky you will find he has aligned to what Foucault told him 40 years ago which says a lot.
@oneginee Chomsky has made no such changes. And Foucault does have an effective "system of thought". However, he is void of morality or justice; these notions are ideological musings to him. For those who share a moral common ground with Chomsky, that is by accepting elementary notions of justice and freedom, his utopia of pervasive democracy and workers committees is profoundly enticing.
@oneginee Chomsky has made no such changes. And Foucault does have an effective "system of thought". However, he is void of morality or justice; these notions are ideological musings to him. For those who share a moral common ground with Chomsky, that is by accepting elementary notions of justice and freedom, his utopia of pervasive democracy and workers committees is profoundly enticing.
@mdoob11. Thanks, I realize you are right, Chomsky views have been consistent ever since. My words on Foucault were not incorrect either but you revealed something more important that I did not see : his cold and absolute rationality denies the relevance of morality and justice beyond instrument of controls or "musings". He is not treading the path of humanism. This is worriesome and more so when I realize the times of the TV debate preceded the profoundly sad cambodian khmer rouge genocide.
When the general populous realize they are being mislead when they accept popular beleifs such as,drug cartels are bad and must be destroyed, or imprison the corner dope dealer who is killing our childeren , as is the case with ,The War on Drugs," the new narrative must then be spoon fed to them from sources from which they feel inclusive and superior to the majority if these beleifs are adopted.
i had an examination for my studies (pedagogy).in anthropology was the question,how mr.foucault explains anthropology as obsolete [?didnt he more say its partly dispositife for reigning people in exzessive forms of power?] and - here it comes - after we would have explained this(we nearly never hear of him) we were asked to value the consistancy of the methodology of this "obsoleteness"- with immanent aim to falsificate it as unscientific in front of the law of anthropology. studying is great...
Well, where to begin anmuyer... you do realise that you have an extreme lack of capacity to understand foucauldian thought. Either that, or you are undereducated on the matter and are in way over your head. Just because some dumbfu*ck like you has randomly stumbled upon a foucaldian text and upon reading it has womited upon oneself under one's own ignorance, doesn't mean one has the right to expse the very peak of human thought to ridicule. All of the fu*ckin antropologists lack the capacity.
Come say that shit in my hood you mother f*cker, Im a chol@ in the Russian mafia and gonna cut your lil dick and shove it down your hollow Nietzschean vernacular.
Having read everything there is to read about Foucault´s work I can say that this video entertained me. I dont think its ridiculing his work in any way :)
"Longévité d’une imposture – Michel Foucault,
suivi de Foucaultphiles et foucaulâtres"
Jean-Marc Mandosio / Éditions de l’Encyclopédie des Nuisances, Paris, 2010.
YunaBonbeurre 1 year ago
google "the sokal affair" and be enlightened.
brothamouzoune 1 year ago
what is the title for the first song?! It is incredible...
kingstream03 1 year ago
Krazy World by La LEy
anmujer 1 year ago
second only to chomsky
samerk098 1 year ago
if you are fluent in both french and english. comme c'est mon cas (like I am). and you watched the Foucault - Chomsky debate then you would realize that his system of thought was more solid and that of a genius than Chomsky's which is great too in his own right. In fact if you listen to recent discourse by Chomsky you will find he has aligned to what Foucault told him 40 years ago which says a lot.
oneginee 1 year ago
Comment removed
mdoob11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@oneginee Chomsky has made no such changes. And Foucault does have an effective "system of thought". However, he is void of morality or justice; these notions are ideological musings to him. For those who share a moral common ground with Chomsky, that is by accepting elementary notions of justice and freedom, his utopia of pervasive democracy and workers committees is profoundly enticing.
mdoob11 1 year ago
@oneginee Chomsky has made no such changes. And Foucault does have an effective "system of thought". However, he is void of morality or justice; these notions are ideological musings to him. For those who share a moral common ground with Chomsky, that is by accepting elementary notions of justice and freedom, his utopia of pervasive democracy and workers committees is profoundly enticing.
mdoob11 1 year ago
@mdoob11. Thanks, I realize you are right, Chomsky views have been consistent ever since. My words on Foucault were not incorrect either but you revealed something more important that I did not see : his cold and absolute rationality denies the relevance of morality and justice beyond instrument of controls or "musings". He is not treading the path of humanism. This is worriesome and more so when I realize the times of the TV debate preceded the profoundly sad cambodian khmer rouge genocide.
oneginee 1 year ago
When the general populous realize they are being mislead when they accept popular beleifs such as,drug cartels are bad and must be destroyed, or imprison the corner dope dealer who is killing our childeren , as is the case with ,The War on Drugs," the new narrative must then be spoon fed to them from sources from which they feel inclusive and superior to the majority if these beleifs are adopted.
MJRockX 2 years ago
control, simulation, punish, power-knowledge, placebo, close sociaty ...
Beznazvy 2 years ago
I'd like to know the title of the first song, please? Thanks!
rockybr420 2 years ago
what is this music? Please reply:)
Timurito1 2 years ago
I integrated several songs, did you want the title of all the songs or did you have certain songs in mind?
anmujer 2 years ago
Please give the title of all of the songs. It's an interesting selection especially in this context. Thanks.
YusefAsabiyah 2 years ago
Krazy World by La LEy
anmujer 1 year ago
If you get Foucault you get this video, nice job!
Jackiepmac 2 years ago
This greatly undermines Foucault.
hauntmeinharmony 2 years ago
when at the very start they have it as power/knowledge I was done.
it's
POWER-KNOWLEDGE
urfnklnme 2 years ago
Great music.
youarethefox 2 years ago
i had an examination for my studies (pedagogy).in anthropology was the question,how mr.foucault explains anthropology as obsolete [?didnt he more say its partly dispositife for reigning people in exzessive forms of power?] and - here it comes - after we would have explained this(we nearly never hear of him) we were asked to value the consistancy of the methodology of this "obsoleteness"- with immanent aim to falsificate it as unscientific in front of the law of anthropology. studying is great...
vanillacokemz 2 years ago
This video says everything you need to know about Foucault and more...nothing at all.
behaack 2 years ago
doesn't really say anthing unfortunately
21lgsl 2 years ago
I share your interest in Foucault. Thanks for making the video ;-)
I made some videos on Foucault too. See my channel.
UnderstandingTheSelf 2 years ago
yeah, this is garbage. too bad...
jonsays 2 years ago
Well, where to begin anmuyer... you do realise that you have an extreme lack of capacity to understand foucauldian thought. Either that, or you are undereducated on the matter and are in way over your head. Just because some dumbfu*ck like you has randomly stumbled upon a foucaldian text and upon reading it has womited upon oneself under one's own ignorance, doesn't mean one has the right to expse the very peak of human thought to ridicule. All of the fu*ckin antropologists lack the capacity.
gruppenfurer 2 years ago
Come say that shit in my hood you mother f*cker, Im a chol@ in the Russian mafia and gonna cut your lil dick and shove it down your hollow Nietzschean vernacular.
anmujer 2 years ago
Having read everything there is to read about Foucault´s work I can say that this video entertained me. I dont think its ridiculing his work in any way :)
donmemoli 2 years ago
You didn't really explain anything here.
BrianTheMusicMan 2 years ago
Thanks for the feedback!
anmujer 3 years ago
good job. all you need to know about foucault ;)
donmemoli 3 years ago
Thanks! Who will ever understand the mind of Foucault !
anmujer 2 years ago