very incomplete... you are forgetting to factor in the new demand curve. which in theory should also shift proportionally out by the amount of the subsidy.
in the real world when we look at goods and services that have a govt subsidies you will rarely find that the price has declined by the subsidy. in fact, most often you will find that producers will often raise prices close to the new demand curve caused by the unintended consequences of the govt subsidy.
Dear Phil, THANK YOU SO MUCH! I've got my Micro Economics retake in like 5 hours and as i have 3 exams tomorrow, I didn't have enough time to look through all of my economics notes. I've watched all of your videos and i found it so helpful - you have a gift of explaining. Keep posting videos, I'm going to use them for my Macro Economics understanding. Thank you again!
Great video, helped me a lot! I just wanted to ask about the equillibrium price - what exactly is it? Does it represent the average price of products/services or is it more or less the only price at which products are sold?
you are seriously amazing, i wish i had you as a teacher, i thought i would be hopeless for my economics mock exam tomorrow BUT I NOW HAVE HOPE, in the past 10 months i have learnt nothing in comparison to the past 45 mins of your videos
Thank you very much, i have my economics a level in 2 hours and i am happy to say that thanks to you i will understand the questions, thank you very much from spaain!!
What about when the subsidy is directed at consumers? For example, in a labour market the firms are the consumers of labour. The government gives them a subsidy for each hour every hour worked. Would this subsidy be felt entirely by producers (workers) or some of it?
Subsidies act like negative taxes??? Last I checked the government didn't produce any revenue. It collects money from the private sector and distributes as it sees fit. Subidies take from taxpayers and redistribute the funds to govt chosen producers. This is not a negative tax. It does not create lower costs of goods. It simply hides the true cost of goods from the average taxpaying citizen.
Also, mass producers and large corporations find it rather handy to be able to lobby politicians for theses subsidies. Subsidies are not a "negative tax". The are an unseen tax on consumers. Where exactly do you think the govt gets the money to dole out subidies? What services does the govt provide to generate the funds to provide these subidies? Last I checked the govt produces nothing.
Propping up domestic production through subsidies, tarriffs and quotas only hurts american consumers. It is a form of mercantilism. It prevents citizens from obtaining cheaper imports by artificially lowering the cost of domestic production. Read "The Great Sugar Shaft". You should be ashamed of this statist spewing propaganda piece. It has little to do with economics.
Hi, Phil. Thanks for the amazing video on subsidy. However, I have a question in mind. In subsidy, why does the consumer gain more when demand is inelastic? And why does the producer gain more when demand is elastic? Thanks..!
Hey I know I'm not Mr.Holden, but hopefully I can help? This might be good revision for me too. Um, If the price elasticity of demand is inelastic this means the demand curve will be relatively vertical. This means the area on the diagram of subsidy passed onto consumer will be greater. And also, logically, if consumers are relatively unresponsive to changes in price then the firm can "absorb" more of the subsidy as it will not effect the demand of the good, right?
Hi Phil.! May I ask you a question? In subsidies, why does the producer gain more when demand is elastic? And why consumer gain more when demand is inelastic?
@fromage92@fromage92 You actually have the concepts mixed up. When the PED is INELASTIC, consumers are irresponsive to changes in price, so the producers pass on the incidence of tax on to them, in the form of higher prices. But, when the PED is ELASTIC, producers cannot risk losing sales by increasing their prices, so they end up paying a higher portion of the tax.
@pajholden Thank you! Coming from you, it means a lot! =) Since you're online, let me take the opportunity to thank you for all the videos you've uploaded. My AS Economics Exam is in 3 days, and you're videos have helped me out a LOT.
@RTX94 As such, tax the crap out of cigarettes. We seriously need to start thanking smokers, they pay so much in taxes and they don't collect social security... how great is that?
You will notice that the subsidy given land and real estate in general via failure of governments to tax community created land values (meaning zero cost of production/free lunch to land owners) and tax deductions for everything under the sun do not result in lower cost of land rather just the opposite since land is in fixed supply. These subsidies give people the incentive to buy land/real estate not just for use but for investment thus driving up the price to all buyers. Buyers pay all/more.
hey yeah that is a really good idea, do you have a DVD or something we can get..? cant get enough mate ur an awesome teacher, u make eco a pretty cool subject :o)
One of the best economic teachers ever! What you have produced in all your videos is nothing short of amazing. Its clear and concice and actually understandable - your MINT!!! And you should create a DVD i know i would buy it lol
thanks so much! when you say the firms absorb the subsidy...does that mean they just keep the subsidy as profit? how would firms not use the subsidy properly?
OMGG thank you soo much for your videos :P i totally didnt get subsidies but you made it TOTALLY clear for me. i am more confident in passing my GCSE mock exam .
Thanks for the illustration....however i'm having difficulties with the following statement...
Subsidies typically lead to overproduction, where the marginal social cost at the quantity produced is greater than the marginal social benefit. I can't seem to see this relationship in the graph, if you have the time...please could you tell me where these points would be? Thank you.
hi rfvo. I suppose that if the point of a subsidy is to boost production of a positive externality creating good, then assessing the correct size of the required subsidy to lift the market generated output to the socially optimal level could be difficult. What if the subsidy was over estimated? Couldn't that lead to over-production - that is to a level of output beyond the socially optimal level? It's a bit like not getting the tax right on negative externality products... Regards, Phil Holden.
Thanks for this video! Really helped on explaining the benefits/consequences of subsidies for a globalization class!
JCM718 3 days ago
wow this was really useful... but i still hv problem memorising it all
didierfagba 1 week ago
Omg thanks so much. Got my AS mocks in 9 days
sarahrocksyourworld 1 week ago
very incomplete... you are forgetting to factor in the new demand curve. which in theory should also shift proportionally out by the amount of the subsidy.
in the real world when we look at goods and services that have a govt subsidies you will rarely find that the price has declined by the subsidy. in fact, most often you will find that producers will often raise prices close to the new demand curve caused by the unintended consequences of the govt subsidy.
tindallta 2 weeks ago
what over methods can the government use to over come positive externalities?
eatacake12345 1 month ago
If i do well in my Economics exam next week it will be solely down to you, seems to actually make sense when you teach it. Thankyou!
georgiarebecca100 1 month ago
our econ teacher recommended this video..
this makes so much more sense than what our teacher taught us xP
ShotGun1861 1 month ago
You are a genius why cant my teacher teach like this
MrNkdj2 2 months ago
Very helpful, thanks :)
Tps1969 3 months ago
What happens with producer surplus after subsidies? And what is the deadweight loss? Thnks
havanabeachincuba 4 months ago 2
@havanabeachincuba
producer surplus decreases
colbykhor 3 months ago
i like your videos :)
sfsy1 4 months ago
thq guy=]
saneedblozio 4 months ago
what about Taxes?
ysmn68 8 months ago
Thank you. My teacher recommended you! ;D
ysmn68 8 months ago
thanks a lot
Cytoskeleton1 8 months ago
thanks
lbc723 8 months ago
Thanks heaps from AUSTRALIA, keeping me passing University since 2010
toohug01 8 months ago
thankxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
abdullahfbi911 9 months ago
Dear Phil, THANK YOU SO MUCH! I've got my Micro Economics retake in like 5 hours and as i have 3 exams tomorrow, I didn't have enough time to look through all of my economics notes. I've watched all of your videos and i found it so helpful - you have a gift of explaining. Keep posting videos, I'm going to use them for my Macro Economics understanding. Thank you again!
Lietumi 9 months ago
The Like Bar looks like a joint <3
Theoreowhore 9 months ago
Great video! I just wished you included an explanation of how consumers surplus and producers surplus were effected.
studentecon 9 months ago
Great video, helped me a lot! I just wanted to ask about the equillibrium price - what exactly is it? Does it represent the average price of products/services or is it more or less the only price at which products are sold?
milanjelenjeden 9 months ago
THANKS PROFESSOR!!! LOVE FROM SWEDEN
showmick12 9 months ago
what about elasticity? what happens if demand/supply are inelastic for example?
55gingerninja 9 months ago
Thank you so much, now it all makes sense! This helped me a lot! :)
RickyZzone 10 months ago
thanks man, you helped me a lot for my econ's test preparation
alan170892 10 months ago
you are seriously amazing, i wish i had you as a teacher, i thought i would be hopeless for my economics mock exam tomorrow BUT I NOW HAVE HOPE, in the past 10 months i have learnt nothing in comparison to the past 45 mins of your videos
891anarchy 11 months ago
I LOVE YOU PROFESSOR! YOU REALLY HELPED ME ALOT! PLEASE KEEP THE VIDEOS COMING! FROM MALAYSIA! ;)
shahrul19933 11 months ago
I love your videos. They have really helped me to understand theories of Economics much more clearly. Thanks for your effort.
TBUT743 1 year ago
pajholden,
so what are the effects of say subsidies on price volatility of agricultural commodities?
setch77 1 year ago
Thank you for your videos are great!!
Do you have videos on all micro economic topics?
Is there a way I can get access to all your videos as I couldn't find some
For e.g. How quotas effect the importing and exporting countries.
Or do you have a DVD I can buy.....
I have my exams in 6 days.....
I would have studied in any University in Sydney if you were the lecturer!!! too bad Greece is quite far.
You are a legend!!!!!!
dk1536dk 1 year ago
Thank you very much, i have my economics a level in 2 hours and i am happy to say that thanks to you i will understand the questions, thank you very much from spaain!!
holamellamobob111 1 year ago
you have now replaced one of my teachers! great vids
TomConnorV 1 year ago
I cannot say this enough... THANK YOU!!!!!!!!
randomrainbow17 1 year ago
DO YOU GETTING PAYED FOR DOING THIS?!?
gammakilla1 1 year ago
What about when the subsidy is directed at consumers? For example, in a labour market the firms are the consumers of labour. The government gives them a subsidy for each hour every hour worked. Would this subsidy be felt entirely by producers (workers) or some of it?
funnyfunny13 1 year ago
i like the last action u did soooo sweeet ......bidawy tnk u...... ur videos r rly helpful .
sanju0202able 1 year ago
Subsidies act like negative taxes??? Last I checked the government didn't produce any revenue. It collects money from the private sector and distributes as it sees fit. Subidies take from taxpayers and redistribute the funds to govt chosen producers. This is not a negative tax. It does not create lower costs of goods. It simply hides the true cost of goods from the average taxpaying citizen.
cclodfe 1 year ago
Also, mass producers and large corporations find it rather handy to be able to lobby politicians for theses subsidies. Subsidies are not a "negative tax". The are an unseen tax on consumers. Where exactly do you think the govt gets the money to dole out subidies? What services does the govt provide to generate the funds to provide these subidies? Last I checked the govt produces nothing.
cclodfe 1 year ago
Propping up domestic production through subsidies, tarriffs and quotas only hurts american consumers. It is a form of mercantilism. It prevents citizens from obtaining cheaper imports by artificially lowering the cost of domestic production. Read "The Great Sugar Shaft". You should be ashamed of this statist spewing propaganda piece. It has little to do with economics.
cclodfe 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Come Maldives and teach us.We pay $700 monthly+additional bonus by me :P
intelgates 1 year ago
Come Maldives and teach us.We pay $700 monthly+additional bonus by me :P
intelgates 1 year ago
@intelgates tempting..... maybe I will retire there.
pajholden 1 year ago 19
@intelgates only $700 per month? heck my maid gets 1000 euros per month!
DreadAces 2 months ago
Hi, Phil. Thanks for the amazing video on subsidy. However, I have a question in mind. In subsidy, why does the consumer gain more when demand is inelastic? And why does the producer gain more when demand is elastic? Thanks..!
fromage92 1 year ago
@fromage92
Hey I know I'm not Mr.Holden, but hopefully I can help? This might be good revision for me too. Um, If the price elasticity of demand is inelastic this means the demand curve will be relatively vertical. This means the area on the diagram of subsidy passed onto consumer will be greater. And also, logically, if consumers are relatively unresponsive to changes in price then the firm can "absorb" more of the subsidy as it will not effect the demand of the good, right?
I could be wrong..
omgtheskyiscrying 1 year ago
Hi Phil.! May I ask you a question? In subsidies, why does the producer gain more when demand is elastic? And why consumer gain more when demand is inelastic?
fromage92 1 year ago
@fromage92 @fromage92 You actually have the concepts mixed up. When the PED is INELASTIC, consumers are irresponsive to changes in price, so the producers pass on the incidence of tax on to them, in the form of higher prices. But, when the PED is ELASTIC, producers cannot risk losing sales by increasing their prices, so they end up paying a higher portion of the tax.
Hope that helped! =)
RTX94 1 year ago
@RTX94 very well put!
pajholden 1 year ago
@pajholden Thank you! Coming from you, it means a lot! =) Since you're online, let me take the opportunity to thank you for all the videos you've uploaded. My AS Economics Exam is in 3 days, and you're videos have helped me out a LOT.
RTX94 1 year ago
@RTX94 As such, tax the crap out of cigarettes. We seriously need to start thanking smokers, they pay so much in taxes and they don't collect social security... how great is that?
buckeyesports1 1 year ago
hi phil, your videos are great, is there anyway u can make a video or tell me how to graph curves via equations?
bbxshortcake 1 year ago
thank you very much pajholden!!
ur much better then my teacher!
prinsessan11 1 year ago
What about subsidies given to consumers so they can purchase more?
WOGI5M 1 year ago
Thank you!
puresickdead 1 year ago
Thank you for making things clear for me. If only there were more lecturers like you!
eskimosoap 1 year ago
absolute legend!!!
MrDankeil 1 year ago
Thank you so much, these are great for revision! I wish our teacher was this clear in explaining. You do a marvellous job.
RememberSeptember 2 years ago
HI Phil
Thanks soo much for these videos, Every single person that has watched these videos appreciates your work.
thanks again
lelectronic 2 years ago
My fav TEACHER! A*
waveboi93 2 years ago 2
wow, amazing
from Greece!!
johnnycyrus 2 years ago
Thank you so much. I have an economics module next week and you may have saved my life.
rainingonshinygrass 2 years ago
Love your videos. Life Savers. Thankssssssss.
Kachaloo 2 years ago
thanks again
and i agree you should make a dvd
georgejacksonio 2 years ago
Really useful videos... When im to tired to read out of my text book i always watch your videos...
I agree with "cxilelab": "please do continue with your valuable lessons"...
kgswe 2 years ago
really useful ! thankyou
gayathiritube 2 years ago
You will notice that the subsidy given land and real estate in general via failure of governments to tax community created land values (meaning zero cost of production/free lunch to land owners) and tax deductions for everything under the sun do not result in lower cost of land rather just the opposite since land is in fixed supply. These subsidies give people the incentive to buy land/real estate not just for use but for investment thus driving up the price to all buyers. Buyers pay all/more.
ourearthhome 2 years ago
Legend!
lizzieestmoi 2 years ago
Thank you. Your lessons are amazing! Please keep up the good work!
gorf92 2 years ago
my school needs teachers like you! you seem very interactive & your explanations are succinct & clear.
please do continue with your valuable lessons!
cxilelab 2 years ago
how would u apply this to labor economics with supply of labor and demand for labor?
fancygremlin 2 years ago
real good. thanks..
curea113 2 years ago
hey yeah that is a really good idea, do you have a DVD or something we can get..? cant get enough mate ur an awesome teacher, u make eco a pretty cool subject :o)
sageGRX20 2 years ago
One of the best economic teachers ever! What you have produced in all your videos is nothing short of amazing. Its clear and concice and actually understandable - your MINT!!! And you should create a DVD i know i would buy it lol
02dalyd 2 years ago
If you made a dvd you'd be the most minted economics teacher on the planet. How is it possible to be this good??
I've got an A level exam tomorrow on the EU and I've learnt more in the last 30 minutes from your videos than this entire year at school!!!!!!!
ollysprings 2 years ago 22
you should make an economics tutorial dvd or something for a-levels
dannyf28 2 years ago
real help! thanx!
Undakover 2 years ago
our school will sell all its teachers to get you in!!!
GIOGS 2 years ago 2
Thanks so much! if your ever in Auckland New Zealand get in contact with me PLEASE! Our school would be honored to have you as a guest speaker
biddybombogan 2 years ago
I have sent you an e-mail! thank-you so much for all of this! COME BE MY ECONOMICS TEACHER!!! lol
marinafriends 2 years ago
so the producers keep the L shaped block at 3:08?
martinchingy 2 years ago
you were made for this...you should just do this all day thx again...a lot of help for ib exams
sna3ke 2 years ago
Once again made things soo much clear and interesting. Thanks.
Kachaloo 2 years ago
Another great vid, wish you could be our teacher down here in australia
5 Stars...
Shashi
ShashiK34 2 years ago
thanks so much! when you say the firms absorb the subsidy...does that mean they just keep the subsidy as profit? how would firms not use the subsidy properly?
xxjessistoocoolxx 2 years ago
Thanks for commenting - In that they don't pass on all the subsidy in the form of lower prices to their customers.
pajholden 2 years ago
thx homie
britneey 2 years ago
OMGG thank you soo much for your videos :P i totally didnt get subsidies but you made it TOTALLY clear for me. i am more confident in passing my GCSE mock exam .
littlelovehearts 2 years ago
awesome video!
thank you
please keep posting these extremely helpful videos!
pinkbutterflyyyyy 2 years ago
You are just perfect!!!
YunusSancak 2 years ago
once again, extremely enlightening! thank you very much! :-)
dointime85 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
merrisatsai 3 years ago
Please continue these videos, they are way more helpful than my own teacher is.
dushirobin 3 years ago 29
Again, nice vid. Although I completely disagree with the idea of a subsidy, you do a great job explaining it!
cambo61 3 years ago
Producers may use the subsidies to cover cost, and not pass it down to the consumer. Why else may subsidies not decrease price?
ne1l007 3 years ago
please can you speak about gold v paper (fiat currency) or decentralised v centralised banks and economic planning thank you
manukhan1987 3 years ago
is it the same as the incidence of indirect tax? like... when the demand is more elastic producers pay(keep) more..?
sweetylotion 3 years ago
Yes ofcourse, totally understand it now, Thanks so much.
rfvo 3 years ago
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the illustration....however i'm having difficulties with the following statement...
Subsidies typically lead to overproduction, where the marginal social cost at the quantity produced is greater than the marginal social benefit. I can't seem to see this relationship in the graph, if you have the time...please could you tell me where these points would be? Thank you.
rfvo 3 years ago
hi rfvo. I suppose that if the point of a subsidy is to boost production of a positive externality creating good, then assessing the correct size of the required subsidy to lift the market generated output to the socially optimal level could be difficult. What if the subsidy was over estimated? Couldn't that lead to over-production - that is to a level of output beyond the socially optimal level? It's a bit like not getting the tax right on negative externality products... Regards, Phil Holden.
pajholden 3 years ago
wow this sounds crystal clear now.
Thanks
luvisprecious 3 years ago
i love your videoes! definately a great reivew for my economics courses im taking:)
Cloud10v35Aerith 3 years ago
GREAT!
tanzirou 3 years ago