@bnjones28 You are confused my friend, both the republicans ad them democrats are pricks, both work to keep things the same, the system is broken, having only two parties, is a joke... what kind of choice is that? The republicans are for the upper 5% of the wealth and the democrats are for the middle class, but neither do a thing about the ghettos, or the poor in general. Stop being brainwashed by the news.
Reporters acting in the capacity of a public speaker are considered "public officers" and "public servants" because their job is to exercise the First Amendment for the benefit of all (it's a responsibility), so when they do not cover pertinent news topics (like war, including photos) for non-obvious reasons (political or controlling reasons) they revoke their right to perform under that office. People need to self-educate themselves on the rights and the rules for public priveleges like media.
@nickothompson Yes, and it is OUR job (above-named People) to self-educate. Relying on someone else to teach you is how cults are created and sheep-mentality evolves. It is the lack of an interest in educating ourselves that created this quandary we find ourselves in today.
The politicians, TV talking heads, military leaders, and economic titans are all controlling us because we lack an exercised freedom. We think freedom is free, and that being free is a state. No, it's a job. Start now.
other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. --- U.S. Code, Title 42, Ch. 21, code 1983
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or
I don't personally like Stark, but his words on the floor are extremely important to consider. However, for the benefit of the crowd, I submit:
American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 US 382, 442-43 (1950).
"Thought control is a copyright of totalitarianism, and we have no claim to it. It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error.”
“...an... officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government.” Brookfield Co. v. Stuart (1964) 234 F. Supp 94. 99 (U.S.D.C., Wash.D.C.)
"The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state." Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. §1785: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct.1973, 41 L.Ed.287.
@doc1038 - Amazingly, you have not caught Cenk's obvious sarcasm; I may not always agree with this man (nobody truly agrees with anyone else's; there's always some disagreement) but I will admit: He does make news entertaining and, when serious, breaks down the facts for his viewers.
That's about 7 words more than i can say about the MSM talking heads and their laughing jokes about serious issues and indifferent attitude towards important issues (real important issues)
Wait a minute. Did Pete Stark just call the President a liar on the floor of the House? Who would have known. I guess the vote to rebuke him didn't make the papers.
BOTH parties are lying rotten crooks who conspire AGAINST the people more often than either ever gives gives us a break from their spending the future incomes of the unborn ($200K/person - usdebtclock "dot" org) and every scumbag one of the parasites getting filthy rich as they steal our money, lives and rights.
15.11.08 Pete Stark is telling the way it is, the truth. You Bolshevist Republicans cant stand the truth, because you Republicans are so used to lying for the last 10 years that you dont know the truth any more.
American politicians don't have the right to speak their minds. Their jobs is to be muppets of America's corporation controlled pseudo-democracy. The Iraq war is the start of america's downfall, the spotlight has already moved to Asia.
The first thing is that they have to have a "mind" in order to speak it. His problem is that he does not not have one. He spouts all of this nonsense about Bush taking pleasure in the soldiers "heads being blown off". One can disagree with the war in Iraq without talking like a fool.
Cenk is 100% right when he describes the "Seven Steps for Media Domination and Opponent Destruction." It isn't amazing that it works so well; after all, the Republicans have both the mainstream AND right-wing media backing them up, it's systematic. What IS amazing is that Stark still apologized after Cenk did this. If Stark saw/heard this particular show before he caved in, then he's a weak pussy, because this show should have strengthened him. And Nancy Pelosi has turned into a DINO.
"after all, the Republicans have both the mainstream AND right-wing media backing them up"
On what planet are you living? The main stream media are all backing up the Democrats and liberals. Stark caved because he was WRONG! He let his true liberal insanity show through clearly to the American people. Liberals hate the military and despise the use of force.
"They found equipment for "uranium-enrichment centrifuges" whose only plausible use was as part of a clandestine nuclear-weapons program. In all these cases, "Iraqi scientists had been told before the war not to declare their activities to the U.N. inspectors," the official said."
Like I said, do a little research outside of the main stream media and the Democrat talking points. There is no doubt Saddam was pursuing WMDs. The only question was how successful he had been. Fortunately for us, he had not produce any feasible weapon in sufficient quantity.
Firstl Im not a democrat ,secondly it seems that you have admitted what I said in the first place ther were no WMD,thirdly you are an arse.The war both the first gulf war and second Gulf war were procurred to get the oil.The only reason for the break was that George Bush snr managed to lose the election and let Clinton in. I can tell you are one one these cunts that need the last word so spout your shite here while I bombard your utube page directly.
First, I never said you were a Democrat, only that you parroting their talking points. Second, they found small amounts of WMDs (biological) in Iraq. Third, Saddam was seeking WMDs. Fourth, Saddam invaded Kuwait. Bush Sr. should have taken him down then and there.
Your implication was clear all my data is from non partisan sources including my own eyes ,secondly its no suprise ther was wmd still left,he had bought so much from the US when you were still mates,thirdly the whole war was conjured up to make the excuse for this war ,including 911 ,and finally I knew you needed to have the last word you predictable twat
I note that you have changed your you tube page so that only people you approve of can leave comments,ha ha what a fucking hypocrite ,free speech as long it says what you want,fucking typical
If you want to say something, say it here. I don't have time to run to my page and delete your profanity and nonsense. I am all for free speech, even for morons like you.
I think all you have is time since you got saked from your Wallmart security job.The only person speaking nonsense here is you, and the only profanity is your ignorance and your ad nauseam denial of the truth.
I have not denied the truth. FACT: we have not suffered another domestic attack since 9-11. Our lives, our economy, and our country continue without any effects of the attack. This is the single greatest failure of Bin Laden.
It wasnt Bin Laden ,the reason that you havent been attacked,yet,is because Buch and his cohorts have got what they wanted,the Iraqui oil fields and the Patriot Act.Where is Bim Laden,he kills 4000 yanks blows up 4 buildings and you wait 6 months before you go after him and 4 years later he is still free!Enjoy the cattle trucks when the come to take you away.
I have nothing to hide. I would gladly let the government listen to my calls, see my library records, and even my medical records. Only dope smoking,drug pushing, porno peddling, subversive, AIDS infected, scum have to worry.
Insults and stupid quotes are not a substitute for the truth. The President has made a ton of mistakes but his strategy in fighting terrorism is not one of them. Fighting terrorism is not the same as chasing Bin Laden.
What comment was stupid ,they are totally appropriate to you.Bush has made no mistakes he is right on the money,got the oil,split the country,and brought the Patriot act,bang ban bang.
What oil? The top five countries we import oil from are CANADA, SAUDI ARABIA, MEXICO, NIGERIA, and VENEZUELA. The President has not split the country, the Democrats did and continue to do that. As for the Patriot act, I am so tired of people whining about that. When I start seeing being misused I might be concerned, but so far, it is nothing but hype.
"Both Duelfer and Kay found Iraq had "a clandestine network of laboratories and safe houses with equipment that was suitable to continuing its prohibited chemical- and biological-weapons [BW] programs," the official said. "They found a prison laboratory where we suspect they tested biological weapons on human subjects."
"The Iraq Survey Group, ISG, whose intelligence analysts are managed by Charles Duelfer, a former State Department official and deputy chief of the U.N.-led arms-inspection teams, has found "hundreds of cases of activities that were prohibited" under U.N. Security Council resolutions, a senior administration official tells Insight."
Even George Bush has acknowledged that "Charles Duelfer has now issued a comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were there."
Deulfer's Iraq Study group also concluded that Iraq did not have a nuclear weapons program, saying, "Saddam Hussein ended the nuclear program in 1991 following the Gulf War," and there was "no evidence to suggest concerted efforts to restart the program."
WASHINGTON - In his final word, the CIA's top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has "gone as far as feasible" and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.
Like most liberals, Stark is enslaved by his emotions, which makes him dangerously irrational most of the time. That being clarified, I'm sure President Bush and the US troops will gracefully accept his apology. However, Stark has a long history of these hate-filled outbursts, and should, in good conscious, resign for the good of his party and the nation.
CFR CEO David Rockefeller: "..we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States"..one-world rule. MEMOIRS CFR founded UN at 'Dumbarton Oaks' with Stalin's Alger Hiss. Goal: NWO CFR Members: Obama, Romney, H Clinton, Giuliani, Edwards, Rockefeller, Cheney, Richardson, Dodd, Thompson "The CFR controls American media" 5 min Terrorstorm 2h "070807_timeline_to_tyranny"
I wish you would change your name. Young Turks doesn't seem appropriate somehow. I have a great deal of respect for Turks. Real Turks.
This guy shouldn't apologize. He shouldn't have the opportunity to apologize, He should be literally tarred and feathered, and rode out of town on the rails.
The poor old guy is senile now. I almost feel guilty in criticizing him.
true he is there for fucking oil,the deaths are just an added bonus.$450 billion dollars for fucking oil,fuck you could have paid Sadamm off for a quarter of that and not a shot fired.How we know he went in for oil because he sure as fuck didnt go in for wmd nor to get Bin laden.GROW UP WE HAVE ALL BEEN HAD IN THE BIGGEST CON TRICK IN HISTORY
We did not go in for oil. We don't import that much oil from Iraq. This whole thing started when Saddam invaded Kuwait. You need to grow up and learn a little history.
No you prick that was Gulf war 1 not now this was for oil under the guise of wmd and chasing,ha ha Bin Laden has the second largest stock of oil in the world.You are a fucking idiot check your history before gob off you fucking twat
Learn to read and write. Bin Laden has no oil. He is a person, not a country. We removed Saddam because he was seeking to acquire WMDs in clear violation of the cease-fire agreement he signed to end Gulf War 1. After 9-11, we could not afford to risk him staying in power. We also needed to establish a foreign front in the war on terrorism.
Learn to read fuckwit the reason we went into Iraq as well as wmd was to chase aLqueda out.The real reason was to steal the oil and bring inthe Patriot act after 911 to shut everyone up.Ther was no WMD there was no programme for WMD and you sir are a fucking pig carrying idiot
You should do a google search and educate yourself before you speak. Saddam was in violation and had several WMD programs which he successfully concealed for 12 years from U.N. weapons inspectors. While he had no large stock piles, (good for us) he was pursuing WMDs.
Are you always this dense? Do the research! He employed WMD specialists. He was trying to develop WMDs. Just because he did not have a large stockpile does not change the fact we needed to remove him. In fact, it was good that he had not yet acquired them in large quantity. What difference doe it make? You hate Bush regardless of the facts.
He had NONE,fuck all it was as empty as your brain.What research should I look up ,government propaganda?Why would I hate Bush just because he has spent 450 billion dollars killed 40 000 civillians,caused 1000's us uk troops to be killed thousands more injured,been complicit in 911 and made the west hated in the middle east,what is ther to dislike.What you dont like is critisim and free speech.Ther were NO repeat NO Stockpliles of wmd and that is your argument blown out
We had WMDs. He just did not have them in large quantities. He employed WMD scientists to develop them. These indisputable FACTS, which you could confirm with a simple GOOGLE search. You won't because you would rather be ignorant and angry. Yes, people have died, and they were dying before we invaded. All as a result of SADDAM invading Kuwait.
I'm sorry about this, but you're just wrong. All WMD's discoverd were discarded items from the Iran-Iraq war, and none of them were still feasible as weapons. There were NO wmd's in Iraq. You seem like an intelligent person, and you write very well, but much of what you are saying is simply propaganda.
Saddam was pursuing WMDs. That is a fact. Whether he had any yet or not is simply not relevant. He employed WMD specialists. He failed to comply with the inspections.
Dear Sir I write to warn you that a madman has got control of your computer and is posting moronic posting on Youtube despite the fact that they do not corespond with the real world,please take immediate steps to stop this moron besmirching your good name as clearly no sane person could come up with this shite.He seems to thing by repeating the same pish that it will become fact,
"There is an extensive, yet fragmentary and circumstantial, body of evidence suggesting that Saddam pursued a strategy to maintain a capability to return to WMD after sanctions were lifted.."Iraq Survey Group Report
Just like a liberal, ignore the facts that disprove your disillusion! Is there something abut the word, "extensive", you don't understand? Saddam was still in the WMD business. He still employed scientists in the field. Would you rather we had waited until he had military stockpiles to use against us?
Is there something about the words "fragmentary" and "CIRCUMSTANTIAL" that you don't understand, dipshit? Apparently.
Also, who says I'm a liberal, you jackoff? You don't know a thing about me, yet your presumptuous ignoramus self had to jump to conclusions based on jack shit. You're a fucking idiot and a joke. Go ahead and believe what you want, prick; you're just embarrassing yourself.
You must a closet liberal then because your too stupid to be a conservative. You can mix big words with your profanity, and you still are a moron. He was pursuing WMDs and that is why he refused to comply with the UN inspections.
Big words? What big words? Oh, "apparently"? Yeah, I guess that is a big word for someone of your intellectual capacity. Sorry if it went a little over your head. I'll try to be more conscientious of your special needs next time.
I understand your problem. Mixing profanity with "big" words to cover your own bias and ignorance. I understood what you said, lots of hot air, and no substance.
What is your problem with "big" words? I'm not even using big words, you illiterate twat; if you're so intimidated by the high-school level rhetoric I've been using so far, then maybe you should go back to grade school for a bit and redo your English classes. And how does using profanity cover bias? It only exemplifies it, if nothing else you moron. Apparently "bias" is too big of a word for you to understand as well; hence you talking out of your ass.
I'm not using big words, I'm using words any normal, intelligent adult would use on a regular basis. The fact that you're 50 and think I'm using "big" words is very, very sad. You're living proof that the education system in this country is in serious need of improvement.
And so far, the largest amount of bias exhibited has been by you. I don't say, "You're just like a conservative" repeatedly, do I? You're the one who has the largest bias here, not me. Hypocrite.
You've heard just one political statement by me and thus your bias and presumptuous idiocy leads you to classify me as a liberal. Whatever, moron - keep being a simple-minded fool by labeling everyone you come across based on very little real evidence. You're only giving yourself a bad name.
Ah, spoken like a true retard. There is no gray, just black and white, huh? Only two possibilities IN THE UNIVERSE for someone to be. Do you realize how irrational that kind of limited mindset that is? No, of course you don't; things can only be one or the other, there is no go-between in your microcosm of a mind.
When you look at Stark's comments, there is no gray. He was wrong to say what he said because it was wrong. He apologized because even HE could see that they were totally wrong.
He was wrong because the government spends more on weapons to kill civilians in the Middle East than on education in the US? That's a simple fact, man. Sorry to break it to you, but whether or not his criticism was "right", he did speak some truth. If you want to lie to yourself and say the government cares more about education than death, then fine, but you're only being dishonest.
He is wrong, and he apologized for it. The Federal government spends money on the military because that is the primary purpose of the FEDERAL government. Education is the primary function of the state and local government. However our soldiers do not target civilians, nor does our President take pleasure in our soldiers "getting their heads blown off".
You think agreeing with two opinions suddenly classifies someone as a liberal, despite anything else they believe that may indicate otherwise, no matter how numerous? Your stupidity is so immense it boggles the mind to think about how one such as you came to be. "Uhhhh, you don't agree with me, so you must be a liberal! A dur dur dur dur!"
You got me with that one. Profanity makes such a reasonable argument. The more you protest the label "liberal", there more clearly you demonstrate you are one. Come out of the closet, and embrace your dark side.
What the fuck are you babbling about? How am I a liberal? You sound like an old witch hunter in Salem pressuring someone to confess they're a witch or something, "Arr, you be a witch! Don't deny it, it be true! Yer a witch!" I'm a liberal because I'm an objective thinker? Is that it? All liberals are rational and all conservatives are biased dumbasses? Is that what you're saying?
If that is true, then I guess I have to be a liberal because I'm not a biased, narrow-minded dumbfuck piece of shit like you. That is, of course, only if the whole black or white thing is true. But since there are no absolutes when it comes to ideas and identities based on ideas, then it's irrelevant; I am not a liberal, nor am I a conservative. Hell, to tell the truth I consider myself more of a conservative than a liberal, but of course you'd never buy that, because you're a moron.
You want to make me the topic of discussion and not the video or the facts. The more you claim not to be a liberal, but an "objective thinker" only proves my point. Attacking me rather than making your argument is a classic liberal tactic.
Also, did you happen to find EXACTLY what the group found to be evidence? If it's extensive yet circumstantial and fragmentary, then it's worth taking a look at exactly what they found. Did you happen to get that much detail, or did you just see the "extensive" and shut your brain off after that?
Does it matter? Saddam was hiding something. He refused to comply with the inspections and the monitoring. He had WMD specialists on his payroll. It does not take a great deal of understanding to connect the dots. You guys are just upset that he did not have them developed and could use them on our soldiers.
Plural. Who are you referring to? And you say I'm upset that he didn't develop them? How more of a fucking moron can you be? Christ you're a douchebag. Not only do you think there are only liberals and conservatives, but you assume I'm a murderous psychopath because I don't share your opinion. How much more of an intolerant asshole can you possibly be?
I am referring to YOU moron, and guys like this idiot in this video. You are intolerant one, blinded by hatred for the President. President Bush showed great leadership in finally doing something about terrorism. Our invasion of Iraq was the right thing to do to implement a real strategy to fight terrorism.
And you're blinded by your loyalty to a complete dumbass. I'm a skeptic, you're a sheep. I think for myself, you let some inept, cowardly, and greedy rich boy think for you. If Bush told you to jump off a bridge, I bet you'd do it without question.
He was hiding something! Oh shits, let's invade his country and kill his people just because we are under the impression he's hiding something from us, despite the fact we have no actual evidence to back it up!
We're hiding something from the UN; we don't comply with their investigations - should our country be invaded too, o wise dumbfuck?
Saddam invade Kuwait. Remember? This whole mess started with him invading one of our allies. We did not just pick his name out of hat. He was required to make FULL DISCLOSURE and ALLOW MONITORING. He refused and paid the price. As for UN, it has limited uses, but is to corrupt to be really trusted (i.e. oil for food).
I completly agree on the way these people in the media and the "rightwing conservitives" handle things they cover up the truth and smear anyone that says it in public.
Sight unseen and sound unheard (well, I did see the whole thing beforehand), Stark was note perfect. If you can't take a little criticism, stay outside the Beltway.
Cenk has figured this out very well, but as soon as I heard it, I knew what the right wingers were going to do, and I knew what Pelosi was going to do. It was just a matter of time.
Pete Stark owes no one an apology. Nancy should have kept her mouth shut. Why do Republicans become so offended when the Democrats fight back? They are like schoolyard bullies. They need to be stood up to!
I disagree. According to author of "Bush on the Couch" can't remember his name but he's a psychiatrist, says Bush is a sociopath and does really enjoy inflicting pain.
few ppl despise W more than i do. and i've been against the iraq war since day one .... but even i'm not cynnical enough to think W is amused by soldiers dying.
This turk the jerk should be in Congress, he is a big prick and should fit in with the Lib.s just fine.
bnjones28 1 year ago
@bnjones28 You are confused my friend, both the republicans ad them democrats are pricks, both work to keep things the same, the system is broken, having only two parties, is a joke... what kind of choice is that? The republicans are for the upper 5% of the wealth and the democrats are for the middle class, but neither do a thing about the ghettos, or the poor in general. Stop being brainwashed by the news.
nickothompson 4 months ago
Reporters acting in the capacity of a public speaker are considered "public officers" and "public servants" because their job is to exercise the First Amendment for the benefit of all (it's a responsibility), so when they do not cover pertinent news topics (like war, including photos) for non-obvious reasons (political or controlling reasons) they revoke their right to perform under that office. People need to self-educate themselves on the rights and the rules for public priveleges like media.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh I thin their job is to spin reality. Both liberal and conservative.
nickothompson 4 months ago
@nickothompson Yes, and it is OUR job (above-named People) to self-educate. Relying on someone else to teach you is how cults are created and sheep-mentality evolves. It is the lack of an interest in educating ourselves that created this quandary we find ourselves in today.
The politicians, TV talking heads, military leaders, and economic titans are all controlling us because we lack an exercised freedom. We think freedom is free, and that being free is a state. No, it's a job. Start now.
rotnflesh 4 months ago
other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. --- U.S. Code, Title 42, Ch. 21, code 1983
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or
rotnflesh 1 year ago
I don't personally like Stark, but his words on the floor are extremely important to consider. However, for the benefit of the crowd, I submit:
American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 US 382, 442-43 (1950).
"Thought control is a copyright of totalitarianism, and we have no claim to it. It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error.”
rotnflesh 1 year ago
“...an... officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government.” Brookfield Co. v. Stuart (1964) 234 F. Supp 94. 99 (U.S.D.C., Wash.D.C.)
"The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state." Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. §1785: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct.1973, 41 L.Ed.287.
Look up Civil Rights Violations in the USC
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Im not sure who is DUMBER, Pete Stark, or this Young Turk guy. So I guess its a competition to figure out who the dumbest person alive is.
doc1038 1 year ago
@doc1038 - Amazingly, you have not caught Cenk's obvious sarcasm; I may not always agree with this man (nobody truly agrees with anyone else's; there's always some disagreement) but I will admit: He does make news entertaining and, when serious, breaks down the facts for his viewers.
That's about 7 words more than i can say about the MSM talking heads and their laughing jokes about serious issues and indifferent attitude towards important issues (real important issues)
rotnflesh 1 year ago
This is a perfect example of who stupid, ignorant or just plain crazy youngturks is.
Any thing Pete Stark has said, is saying or will say in the future is WONG!
You back him, your wrong too
And it wasn't the right who made him apologize, it was his own party.
Funny thing is Obama just said he's going to bring combat troops home in Aug., why now?
He's been in office for 2 year why hasn't he done it sooner?
Heres the why, he was told to wait until they were finished.
WE WON! .....deal with it :)
sirhcskoorb 1 year ago
"media destruction" Read Atlas Shrugged for a real eye opener!
SharMess 1 year ago
joe wilson eat your heart out. i guess forced politeness is a new thing. if only w was a brotha, pete stark would have had to step down.
psycologicalnudity 1 year ago
Wait a minute. Did Pete Stark just call the President a liar on the floor of the House? Who would have known. I guess the vote to rebuke him didn't make the papers.
rwnutjob 2 years ago
Facts and logic has a well known liberal bias
twinscythe 2 years ago 5
Who is this fat putz on this video? He needs to calm down and shut the fuck up.
Liberals are such fucking drama queens.
RetCrayon 2 years ago
@RetCrayon I'm pretty sure you meant "conservatives" and that you were watching a Rush Limbaugh video, sir.
NoodlyAppendage15 2 years ago
BOTH parties are lying rotten crooks who conspire AGAINST the people more often than either ever gives gives us a break from their spending the future incomes of the unborn ($200K/person - usdebtclock "dot" org) and every scumbag one of the parasites getting filthy rich as they steal our money, lives and rights.
marxbitesall 2 years ago
15.11.08 Pete Stark is telling the way it is, the truth. You Bolshevist Republicans cant stand the truth, because you Republicans are so used to lying for the last 10 years that you dont know the truth any more.
sommeflame34 3 years ago
I totally agreed with Pete until he said "amusement". It's not amusement, it's ego...
crazytvfan815 3 years ago 2
Is it illegal to say that bush is dumb?
Well if they want me to lie instead, then okay ..
9000pooper 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
whats wrong with this guy? I think he sniffed cocaine
TommyGun002 3 years ago
mong head
flipthenuts 3 years ago
He is TOTALLY OUT of touch. See our YouTUBE videos of his local Town Meetings!
GoldenGateMinutemen 3 years ago
wat a dork dis guy iz..btw fox tv suks bush's
mdwahid 4 years ago
politics makes my mind want to scream and throw blood from its hands it does not have
davetoporek 4 years ago
American politicians don't have the right to speak their minds. Their jobs is to be muppets of America's corporation controlled pseudo-democracy. The Iraq war is the start of america's downfall, the spotlight has already moved to Asia.
monnomsti 4 years ago
The first thing is that they have to have a "mind" in order to speak it. His problem is that he does not not have one. He spouts all of this nonsense about Bush taking pleasure in the soldiers "heads being blown off". One can disagree with the war in Iraq without talking like a fool.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
I owe Barney an apology for forgetting him in my apology
lowerself 4 years ago
Funny! NOT!
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
FUNNY YES
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
Cenk is 100% right when he describes the "Seven Steps for Media Domination and Opponent Destruction." It isn't amazing that it works so well; after all, the Republicans have both the mainstream AND right-wing media backing them up, it's systematic. What IS amazing is that Stark still apologized after Cenk did this. If Stark saw/heard this particular show before he caved in, then he's a weak pussy, because this show should have strengthened him. And Nancy Pelosi has turned into a DINO.
BobCubTAC 4 years ago
"after all, the Republicans have both the mainstream AND right-wing media backing them up"
On what planet are you living? The main stream media are all backing up the Democrats and liberals. Stark caved because he was WRONG! He let his true liberal insanity show through clearly to the American people. Liberals hate the military and despise the use of force.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
there has to be term limits on these congressman.....Senate-House and distric reps.....freaking old coots losing it...period!
Fenderman44 4 years ago
"They found equipment for "uranium-enrichment centrifuges" whose only plausible use was as part of a clandestine nuclear-weapons program. In all these cases, "Iraqi scientists had been told before the war not to declare their activities to the U.N. inspectors," the official said."
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
Whenno date given ?Not ONE photograph of this has ever been publishedIraq had civil nuclear programme until Isreal blew it up.
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
Like I said, do a little research outside of the main stream media and the Democrat talking points. There is no doubt Saddam was pursuing WMDs. The only question was how successful he had been. Fortunately for us, he had not produce any feasible weapon in sufficient quantity.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
Firstl Im not a democrat ,secondly it seems that you have admitted what I said in the first place ther were no WMD,thirdly you are an arse.The war both the first gulf war and second Gulf war were procurred to get the oil.The only reason for the break was that George Bush snr managed to lose the election and let Clinton in. I can tell you are one one these cunts that need the last word so spout your shite here while I bombard your utube page directly.
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
First, I never said you were a Democrat, only that you parroting their talking points. Second, they found small amounts of WMDs (biological) in Iraq. Third, Saddam was seeking WMDs. Fourth, Saddam invaded Kuwait. Bush Sr. should have taken him down then and there.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
Your implication was clear all my data is from non partisan sources including my own eyes ,secondly its no suprise ther was wmd still left,he had bought so much from the US when you were still mates,thirdly the whole war was conjured up to make the excuse for this war ,including 911 ,and finally I knew you needed to have the last word you predictable twat
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
Whatever!
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
HA HA predicktable
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
I note that you have changed your you tube page so that only people you approve of can leave comments,ha ha what a fucking hypocrite ,free speech as long it says what you want,fucking typical
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
If you want to say something, say it here. I don't have time to run to my page and delete your profanity and nonsense. I am all for free speech, even for morons like you.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
I think all you have is time since you got saked from your Wallmart security job.The only person speaking nonsense here is you, and the only profanity is your ignorance and your ad nauseam denial of the truth.
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
I have not denied the truth. FACT: we have not suffered another domestic attack since 9-11. Our lives, our economy, and our country continue without any effects of the attack. This is the single greatest failure of Bin Laden.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
It wasnt Bin Laden ,the reason that you havent been attacked,yet,is because Buch and his cohorts have got what they wanted,the Iraqui oil fields and the Patriot Act.Where is Bim Laden,he kills 4000 yanks blows up 4 buildings and you wait 6 months before you go after him and 4 years later he is still free!Enjoy the cattle trucks when the come to take you away.
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
ps to all sorry about the typos ,typing it on an O2 exda exec ,keys tooo smill
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
I am not worried.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
I would be if I were you
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
I have nothing to hide. I would gladly let the government listen to my calls, see my library records, and even my medical records. Only dope smoking,drug pushing, porno peddling, subversive, AIDS infected, scum have to worry.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
Finally go fuck yourself you are obviously a Johnny no mates and are keeping this up until the come with your medication
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
I have plenty of "mates", a wife, and three kids.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
Ha ha that is the saddest thing Ive ever heard,hope to see you on nanny911
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
OSCAR WILDE
"Whenever a man does a thoroughly stupid thing, it is always from the noblest motives."
Think that sums you up,
or how about this from a great American,Mark Twain which really sums you up
"It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt."
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago 2
Insults and stupid quotes are not a substitute for the truth. The President has made a ton of mistakes but his strategy in fighting terrorism is not one of them. Fighting terrorism is not the same as chasing Bin Laden.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
What comment was stupid ,they are totally appropriate to you.Bush has made no mistakes he is right on the money,got the oil,split the country,and brought the Patriot act,bang ban bang.
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
What oil? The top five countries we import oil from are CANADA, SAUDI ARABIA, MEXICO, NIGERIA, and VENEZUELA. The President has not split the country, the Democrats did and continue to do that. As for the Patriot act, I am so tired of people whining about that. When I start seeing being misused I might be concerned, but so far, it is nothing but hype.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
"Both Duelfer and Kay found Iraq had "a clandestine network of laboratories and safe houses with equipment that was suitable to continuing its prohibited chemical- and biological-weapons [BW] programs," the official said. "They found a prison laboratory where we suspect they tested biological weapons on human subjects."
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
"The Iraq Survey Group, ISG, whose intelligence analysts are managed by Charles Duelfer, a former State Department official and deputy chief of the U.N.-led arms-inspection teams, has found "hundreds of cases of activities that were prohibited" under U.N. Security Council resolutions, a senior administration official tells Insight."
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
Even George Bush has acknowledged that "Charles Duelfer has now issued a comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were there."
Deulfer's Iraq Study group also concluded that Iraq did not have a nuclear weapons program, saying, "Saddam Hussein ended the nuclear program in 1991 following the Gulf War," and there was "no evidence to suggest concerted efforts to restart the program."
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
WASHINGTON - In his final word, the CIA's top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has "gone as far as feasible" and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
Like most liberals, Stark is enslaved by his emotions, which makes him dangerously irrational most of the time. That being clarified, I'm sure President Bush and the US troops will gracefully accept his apology. However, Stark has a long history of these hate-filled outbursts, and should, in good conscious, resign for the good of his party and the nation.
patsagainstrats 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2bn2 4 years ago
Stark folded like a lawn chair, the spineless liberal. He actually started to cry when he apologized on the House floor.
ROTFLMFAO!!!
patsagainstrats 4 years ago
He apologized because he was wrong to say what he said, and to believe that his so-called "leadership" would back him up.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
Dude...he apologized today. What a disappointment. Don't know that I should expect anything else at this point though.
CitizenWorm 4 years ago 2
I wish you would change your name. Young Turks doesn't seem appropriate somehow. I have a great deal of respect for Turks. Real Turks.
This guy shouldn't apologize. He shouldn't have the opportunity to apologize, He should be literally tarred and feathered, and rode out of town on the rails.
The poor old guy is senile now. I almost feel guilty in criticizing him.
TAMARLANE 4 years ago
Dude whatever he just told em straight up.
newplanet15 4 years ago
Great post Gentlemen. Keep up the good work!!!
Cantwetalk 4 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What he said was wrong and completely uncalled for. NO ONE wants innocent people killed. The President is not in Iraq for "amusement".
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
true he is there for fucking oil,the deaths are just an added bonus.$450 billion dollars for fucking oil,fuck you could have paid Sadamm off for a quarter of that and not a shot fired.How we know he went in for oil because he sure as fuck didnt go in for wmd nor to get Bin laden.GROW UP WE HAVE ALL BEEN HAD IN THE BIGGEST CON TRICK IN HISTORY
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
We did not go in for oil. We don't import that much oil from Iraq. This whole thing started when Saddam invaded Kuwait. You need to grow up and learn a little history.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
No you prick that was Gulf war 1 not now this was for oil under the guise of wmd and chasing,ha ha Bin Laden has the second largest stock of oil in the world.You are a fucking idiot check your history before gob off you fucking twat
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
Learn to read and write. Bin Laden has no oil. He is a person, not a country. We removed Saddam because he was seeking to acquire WMDs in clear violation of the cease-fire agreement he signed to end Gulf War 1. After 9-11, we could not afford to risk him staying in power. We also needed to establish a foreign front in the war on terrorism.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
Learn to read fuckwit the reason we went into Iraq as well as wmd was to chase aLqueda out.The real reason was to steal the oil and bring inthe Patriot act after 911 to shut everyone up.Ther was no WMD there was no programme for WMD and you sir are a fucking pig carrying idiot
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
You should do a google search and educate yourself before you speak. Saddam was in violation and had several WMD programs which he successfully concealed for 12 years from U.N. weapons inspectors. While he had no large stock piles, (good for us) he was pursuing WMDs.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
I think you will find my comments on your page
Where are the weapons then?Probably in the hold of the plane that flew into the Pentagon piloted by Peter Pan
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
Are you always this dense? Do the research! He employed WMD specialists. He was trying to develop WMDs. Just because he did not have a large stockpile does not change the fact we needed to remove him. In fact, it was good that he had not yet acquired them in large quantity. What difference doe it make? You hate Bush regardless of the facts.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
He had NONE,fuck all it was as empty as your brain.What research should I look up ,government propaganda?Why would I hate Bush just because he has spent 450 billion dollars killed 40 000 civillians,caused 1000's us uk troops to be killed thousands more injured,been complicit in 911 and made the west hated in the middle east,what is ther to dislike.What you dont like is critisim and free speech.Ther were NO repeat NO Stockpliles of wmd and that is your argument blown out
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
We had WMDs. He just did not have them in large quantities. He employed WMD scientists to develop them. These indisputable FACTS, which you could confirm with a simple GOOGLE search. You won't because you would rather be ignorant and angry. Yes, people have died, and they were dying before we invaded. All as a result of SADDAM invading Kuwait.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
official: U.S. calls off search for Iraqi WMDs
Bush stands by decision to go to war, spokesman says
Wednesday, January 12, 2005 Posted: 9:21 PM EST (0221 GMT)
Despite intensive searches, no banned Iraqi weapons were found after the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime.
As my old dad used to say never try to reason with the unreasonable or try to argue with an idiot and you are a fucking unreasonable idiot
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
I'm sorry about this, but you're just wrong. All WMD's discoverd were discarded items from the Iran-Iraq war, and none of them were still feasible as weapons. There were NO wmd's in Iraq. You seem like an intelligent person, and you write very well, but much of what you are saying is simply propaganda.
johnedwards1968 4 years ago 2
Saddam was pursuing WMDs. That is a fact. Whether he had any yet or not is simply not relevant. He employed WMD specialists. He failed to comply with the inspections.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
4951 WEDDEL
Dear Sir I write to warn you that a madman has got control of your computer and is posting moronic posting on Youtube despite the fact that they do not corespond with the real world,please take immediate steps to stop this moron besmirching your good name as clearly no sane person could come up with this shite.He seems to thing by repeating the same pish that it will become fact,
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
"Saddam was pursuing WMDs. That is a fact."
Says who? Based on what evidence?
Muaguana 4 years ago
"There is an extensive, yet fragmentary and circumstantial, body of evidence suggesting that Saddam pursued a strategy to maintain a capability to return to WMD after sanctions were lifted.."Iraq Survey Group Report
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
"... yet fragmentary and circumstantial..."
Congrats, you just killed your own argument. Kudos.
Muaguana 4 years ago
Just like a liberal, ignore the facts that disprove your disillusion! Is there something abut the word, "extensive", you don't understand? Saddam was still in the WMD business. He still employed scientists in the field. Would you rather we had waited until he had military stockpiles to use against us?
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
Is there something about the words "fragmentary" and "CIRCUMSTANTIAL" that you don't understand, dipshit? Apparently.
Also, who says I'm a liberal, you jackoff? You don't know a thing about me, yet your presumptuous ignoramus self had to jump to conclusions based on jack shit. You're a fucking idiot and a joke. Go ahead and believe what you want, prick; you're just embarrassing yourself.
Muaguana 4 years ago 2
You must a closet liberal then because your too stupid to be a conservative. You can mix big words with your profanity, and you still are a moron. He was pursuing WMDs and that is why he refused to comply with the UN inspections.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
Big words? What big words? Oh, "apparently"? Yeah, I guess that is a big word for someone of your intellectual capacity. Sorry if it went a little over your head. I'll try to be more conscientious of your special needs next time.
Muaguana 4 years ago
I understand your problem. Mixing profanity with "big" words to cover your own bias and ignorance. I understood what you said, lots of hot air, and no substance.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
What is your problem with "big" words? I'm not even using big words, you illiterate twat; if you're so intimidated by the high-school level rhetoric I've been using so far, then maybe you should go back to grade school for a bit and redo your English classes. And how does using profanity cover bias? It only exemplifies it, if nothing else you moron. Apparently "bias" is too big of a word for you to understand as well; hence you talking out of your ass.
Muaguana 4 years ago
Your "big" words do not intimidate or cause me a problem. It is actually amusing to read such foolishness.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
I'm not using big words, I'm using words any normal, intelligent adult would use on a regular basis. The fact that you're 50 and think I'm using "big" words is very, very sad. You're living proof that the education system in this country is in serious need of improvement.
Muaguana 4 years ago
Believe whatever you want to believe, and say whatever you want to say. I find it quite amusing .
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
And so far, the largest amount of bias exhibited has been by you. I don't say, "You're just like a conservative" repeatedly, do I? You're the one who has the largest bias here, not me. Hypocrite.
Muaguana 4 years ago
Liberal is as liberal does!
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
You've heard just one political statement by me and thus your bias and presumptuous idiocy leads you to classify me as a liberal. Whatever, moron - keep being a simple-minded fool by labeling everyone you come across based on very little real evidence. You're only giving yourself a bad name.
Muaguana 4 years ago
If you applaud Stark and this moron for the things they say, you had better be a liberal because you are not a conservative.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
Ah, spoken like a true retard. There is no gray, just black and white, huh? Only two possibilities IN THE UNIVERSE for someone to be. Do you realize how irrational that kind of limited mindset that is? No, of course you don't; things can only be one or the other, there is no go-between in your microcosm of a mind.
Muaguana 4 years ago 2
When you look at Stark's comments, there is no gray. He was wrong to say what he said because it was wrong. He apologized because even HE could see that they were totally wrong.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
He was wrong because the government spends more on weapons to kill civilians in the Middle East than on education in the US? That's a simple fact, man. Sorry to break it to you, but whether or not his criticism was "right", he did speak some truth. If you want to lie to yourself and say the government cares more about education than death, then fine, but you're only being dishonest.
Muaguana 4 years ago 3
Sorry, "He was wrong THAT the government..."
Typo.
Muaguana 4 years ago
He is wrong, and he apologized for it. The Federal government spends money on the military because that is the primary purpose of the FEDERAL government. Education is the primary function of the state and local government. However our soldiers do not target civilians, nor does our President take pleasure in our soldiers "getting their heads blown off".
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
You think agreeing with two opinions suddenly classifies someone as a liberal, despite anything else they believe that may indicate otherwise, no matter how numerous? Your stupidity is so immense it boggles the mind to think about how one such as you came to be. "Uhhhh, you don't agree with me, so you must be a liberal! A dur dur dur dur!"
Fucking idiot.
Muaguana 4 years ago 2
You got me with that one. Profanity makes such a reasonable argument. The more you protest the label "liberal", there more clearly you demonstrate you are one. Come out of the closet, and embrace your dark side.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
What the fuck are you babbling about? How am I a liberal? You sound like an old witch hunter in Salem pressuring someone to confess they're a witch or something, "Arr, you be a witch! Don't deny it, it be true! Yer a witch!" I'm a liberal because I'm an objective thinker? Is that it? All liberals are rational and all conservatives are biased dumbasses? Is that what you're saying?
Muaguana 4 years ago
If that is true, then I guess I have to be a liberal because I'm not a biased, narrow-minded dumbfuck piece of shit like you. That is, of course, only if the whole black or white thing is true. But since there are no absolutes when it comes to ideas and identities based on ideas, then it's irrelevant; I am not a liberal, nor am I a conservative. Hell, to tell the truth I consider myself more of a conservative than a liberal, but of course you'd never buy that, because you're a moron.
Muaguana 4 years ago
Beautifully put
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
You are kidding me, right? You claim not to be a liberal and then write, "there are no absolutes". THAT IS LIBERALISM.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
You want to make me the topic of discussion and not the video or the facts. The more you claim not to be a liberal, but an "objective thinker" only proves my point. Attacking me rather than making your argument is a classic liberal tactic.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
You really are a hand dragger
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
4951=19 which is weedel IQ ,this guy is a serial idiot,idiot is a idiot does!
CHANNELOMD 4 years ago
Are you confusing Kim Jong-il with Saddam?
hazel10987 4 years ago
Also, did you happen to find EXACTLY what the group found to be evidence? If it's extensive yet circumstantial and fragmentary, then it's worth taking a look at exactly what they found. Did you happen to get that much detail, or did you just see the "extensive" and shut your brain off after that?
Muaguana 4 years ago
Does it matter? Saddam was hiding something. He refused to comply with the inspections and the monitoring. He had WMD specialists on his payroll. It does not take a great deal of understanding to connect the dots. You guys are just upset that he did not have them developed and could use them on our soldiers.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
"You guys"...
Plural. Who are you referring to? And you say I'm upset that he didn't develop them? How more of a fucking moron can you be? Christ you're a douchebag. Not only do you think there are only liberals and conservatives, but you assume I'm a murderous psychopath because I don't share your opinion. How much more of an intolerant asshole can you possibly be?
Muaguana 4 years ago
I am referring to YOU moron, and guys like this idiot in this video. You are intolerant one, blinded by hatred for the President. President Bush showed great leadership in finally doing something about terrorism. Our invasion of Iraq was the right thing to do to implement a real strategy to fight terrorism.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
"blinded by hatred for the President"
And you're blinded by your loyalty to a complete dumbass. I'm a skeptic, you're a sheep. I think for myself, you let some inept, cowardly, and greedy rich boy think for you. If Bush told you to jump off a bridge, I bet you'd do it without question.
Muaguana 4 years ago
You could not be more wrong. I disagree with the President on nearly everything else he has done. However the war on terrorism is not one of them.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
He was hiding something! Oh shits, let's invade his country and kill his people just because we are under the impression he's hiding something from us, despite the fact we have no actual evidence to back it up!
We're hiding something from the UN; we don't comply with their investigations - should our country be invaded too, o wise dumbfuck?
Muaguana 4 years ago
Saddam invade Kuwait. Remember? This whole mess started with him invading one of our allies. We did not just pick his name out of hat. He was required to make FULL DISCLOSURE and ALLOW MONITORING. He refused and paid the price. As for UN, it has limited uses, but is to corrupt to be really trusted (i.e. oil for food).
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
Fire Pelosi and make Pete Speaker. Apologize what the hell does he need to. Did Boner cry his crocodile tears on the house floor again?
blair227 4 years ago
Nancy Pelosi...what a coward
Qeeyroo 4 years ago
I completly agree on the way these people in the media and the "rightwing conservitives" handle things they cover up the truth and smear anyone that says it in public.
54321bf 4 years ago 3
Thanks Cenk. You're not just fighting for America, you're fighting for rational thought.
MonsterSound 4 years ago 3
maybe its time you people realize democrats and republicans are actually the same people working for the same boss
arrogantenoble 4 years ago 5
the hoSt is a smaRt guy, he's just after ratings.
acuseme 4 years ago
Sight unseen and sound unheard (well, I did see the whole thing beforehand), Stark was note perfect. If you can't take a little criticism, stay outside the Beltway.
Fred13B 4 years ago
Cenk why don't you talk about PKK Kurdish terrorist attacks in Turkey which is coming from Iraq?
ferrariModenas 4 years ago
actually, he did in the same show..
siogyumolcs 4 years ago
I Love You, Pete Stark!!!
Nicoleiia 4 years ago 6
The Turk is dropping science!
wutangson1 4 years ago
Cenk has figured this out very well, but as soon as I heard it, I knew what the right wingers were going to do, and I knew what Pelosi was going to do. It was just a matter of time.
westphalianprinz 4 years ago 3
yep
DblOSmith 4 years ago
Pete Stark owes no one an apology. Nancy should have kept her mouth shut. Why do Republicans become so offended when the Democrats fight back? They are like schoolyard bullies. They need to be stood up to!
westphalianprinz 4 years ago 8
never surrender never apologize. unless it'll get you elected.
InfoJunkieHolland 4 years ago 2
Sheehan? what is she about? Primary's or general election?
Zoroasterrrr 4 years ago
"For the president's amusement" went too far. Other than that, the statement was right on.
voiyour 4 years ago
I disagree. According to author of "Bush on the Couch" can't remember his name but he's a psychiatrist, says Bush is a sociopath and does really enjoy inflicting pain.
voyzovrezon 4 years ago 2
few ppl despise W more than i do. and i've been against the iraq war since day one .... but even i'm not cynnical enough to think W is amused by soldiers dying.
voiyour 4 years ago
Wow, Brilliant. It is high-time for the people to kick out the liars and get back to responsible government.
FulinYu 4 years ago 5
NAILED IT !!! BUSH NEEDS TO GO 6 feet below.
Zoroasterrrr 4 years ago 4
you tell that traitor pelosi!
CALIFORNIANS, YOU HAVE TO ELECT SHEEHAN!!!
siogyumolcs 4 years ago
So Right
Yessurrr 4 years ago