"I don't we're seeing a grimace rather than a smile." I doubt it entirely. "...is clearly shielding his face with his right hand." Or... he's waving with his hand to the people who are cheering and waving at him. "We seem to have seen two distinct reactions by President Kennedy." No we haven't. We've seen a guy waving at people who are cheering loudly and waving to him. Unless, of course, you WANT to see something different in a grainy, COMPLETELY undiscernable video (like this one). Sad.
@UileagPPRG Uh huh - so he just heard a 130 decibel gunshot and that made him grin ear to ear???
Look again at the position of his right hand shielding his face as he twisted to his right. That had to have been the most convoluted "wave" JFK ever made in his life:-)
@Cosmosity My point is that you are making some assumptions based on poor-quality video and rather wild supposition. Further, I have no idea as to whether or not JFK heard a 130dB gunshot (gunshots AND firecrackers both come in on average at around 140dB, incidentally). But, more importantly, neither do you or anyone else know if he heard a 130dB gunshot. The only one who knows if he heard it was him, and he can't tell us. When *assumptions* are presented as evidence, it ruins credibility.
possible shileding by hand from the sun??...interesting that the motocop does not look right or move at at all, excpet everybody elses??? strange or cop may have been deaf?
1. Your analysis of JFK's 'reactions' is very poor. He is just waving.
2. Suggesting he is reacting to a missed shot with a suppressed (silent) rifle requires absolutely no proof, and is a leap too far in your imagination.
Unfortunately, this kind of shoddy analysis only serves to detract even further from the facts of what happened, Please stick to what can be proved, not what you assume.
Once again completely stupid suggestions with zero evidence. Drawing conclusions from things that clearly didn't even happen!
Firstly, Kennedy was smiling and waving, not 'covering his face'
Secondly: 'A bullet was fired and missed' from which you conclude 'the ONLY' plausible explanation was a dodgy suppressed weapon. I have another 'plausible' explanation. No- one fired, no-one missed at the points you claim.
You may as well conclude a rocket launcher was also fired, but also missed!
Speculation; hearsay...this tragic incident has become a cottage industry. The forensic evidence all leads back to the 6th floor of the School Book Depository. It was a sloppy operation done by amateur LHO.
bob i always watch yur videos on jfk very informative. u do real detailed work. excellent. shud have website with all evidence, sources n info. keep it up man, thanks for your service to the country with this great work, and same to all devoted researchers, it for our children, our society n our future!
I think its pretty obvious there was more than 1 shooter. No way did Oswald hit JFK wit that pos Carcano. There were 2 or 3 teams, with the final [kill] shot coming from front right. Nice work Mr. Harris. A plot Machiavelli would be proud of.
I am surprised James Tague heard the first shot, given he was prob the furthest away person from the Dal-Tex building. Did he have the benefit of the u/pass for amplification of the noise. Was he hit by the kerbstone fragments fired from that bullet, or the 2nd one?
@moyadapne Let me answer that question for Mr. Harris, I think the first shot that most people heard hit James in the right cheek as reported, It was only a minor wound though, correct me im wrong....
@Zac757 He did have a mark on his cheek.. he claims from a fragment of kerbstone hit by a bullet. (Although didn't know he'd been 'hit' until it was pointed out to him.) What concerns me is that he says he heard a shot, but many people even closer to him didn't. (Hill, Brehm, Moorman etc.) Or heard a 'firecracker'. Love your 3 strike rule. Would that we could apply that to life in general. More room on the planet for you and me! If I'm a good boy.
just a question really when you show the car from an aerial view as it turns th corner you have one very dull looking red car parked in a odd place its not a parking space like the rest of the cars parked to the side of teh road...but i think you on the right track good work,,;)
Try as i might I just don't see a grimace on JFK's face at Z180. Your conclusions hinge on that grimace so I would expect it to be more pronounced and unequivical.
there was no supressor because there are no barrel threads on the rifle lee oswold used and all of what your saying is completly false,,,, wacth some other videos and learn your facts
my brother is a sophmore in high school and is studying all about this. ive been watching many videos all day. i must say, this one makes the most sense to me. our governent sucks.
Your assumptions reviewing Kennedy's ''reactions'' during the first moments of the Zapruder are just that ...ASSUMPTIONS! Its very clear & OBVIOUS when watching the new, improved digital prints of that home movie that the president is WAVING to the crowd to his right....NOT reacting to a bullet! When he finally comes into view AFTER the road sign.....hes REACTING to the first shot to strike him by raising his arms to his throat. (Conally ALSO reacts at the SAME moment....the magic bullet?) Maybe
I also believe that it is very possible that the gunman could have used a homemade suppressor which can cause a “disastrous misalignment problem.” So if the gunman fired twice and horribly missed by using a homemade suppressor and not a screw on, then the gunman possibly could have easily disconnected the suppresser off of the weapon and fired another shot in quick succession.
I believe the key words here are “sound suppressor” not silencer. When people of today hear the word silencer they think of modern day versions and the sounds that they make based off of examples in Hollywood movies, video games, or perhaps thru real life experiences. Remember a sound suppressor back then isn’t necessarily going to so silent that people would not be able to hear anything.
so what do you suggest? do you think it was all planed and if was what was the reason that they assassinated him,the videos where sabotage as you showed could he have worked alone? i he ad a partner who might it been? was there ever a time they thought i could have been Kennedy wife?
Based on the information of your film i am concluding that, he had suppressor on during the first 2 shots, (if there were), then the sniper may have taken it off, correctly taking it off would only take maybe 10-20 seconds. I would assume that after missing two shots based on experienced, your fingers tend to be harder to control, but still its not difficult to remove it. OR there was a differnt rifle all together.
Based on the information of your film i am concluding that, he had suppressor on during the first 2 shots, (if there were), then the sniper may have taken it off, correctly taking it off would only take maybe 10-20 seconds. I would assume that after missing two shots based on experienced, your fingers tend to be harder to control, but still its not difficult to remove it. OR there was a differnt rifle all together.
It would be interesting to see if there were still pock-marks on the pavement from the missed shots......or conversely, if there was a work order to resurface Elm St.
Key question Bob: Was there any damage to the pavement in here, like there was to the curb below the railway bridge? Also are there not undamaged copies of the Hughes film, at least without the burns shown here? Powerful evidence though.
(or rather they were going on at the same time) shows the prez taking debris from the missed shots but not doing anything about it or saying anything about. strange huh!? I think another missed shot (the one that dented the windshield) the prez also realised but didn't say anything or do anything. the prez knew. god help me for posting this but he knew and should have cancelled the tour of Dealey plaza.(there were several reasons why the S. S. should never have let this go on.)
a good suppressor combined with the propper sub sonic ammo will be very quiet but oswald used standard velocity ammo , the bullet was still breaking the sound barier but the report is more like a firecracker since the suppressor is still moderating the sound at a certain level.
@buttonupshirt I don't know which shot you are referring to. The shots at 285 and after, were not fired from a suppressed weapon. The shot at 160 was heard by some because it shattered when it hit the pavement, generating "sparks" and sounded like a firecracker although it was not loud enough to provoke startle reactions as did the shots at 285 and 312.
Many witnesses like Clint Hill, Charles Brehm, Mary Moorman and others, didn't hear it at all.
@donewithitall1 sometimes I watch films on youtube and they just randomly stop halfway through for no apparent reason and repeated attempts have the same result. I just have to give up and try another day.
@bobharris77 _____and neither did Fields-------but someone did. the dude from the Daltex blding who missed on pourpose? twice! then hit the prez in the back. strange--like the jfk film by O. Stone says "It was a Turkey Shoot"
@bobharris77 oswald didnt kill him. oswald was accused and eventually got shot by a bystander when transferring prisons. Now thats why criminals are carried out in bulletproof vests these days. Hope This Helps!!!
Question...Which shot hit the limo winshield and where do u think it came from?
2 misses, throat shot, Governor shot, pres head shot, Teague at the underpass grazed. (I assume by one of the two misses). The limo windshield could be the second miss. Guessing. So we're looking at atleast 5 shots, possibly 7 if the two misses were not Teague and the windshield. What do u think??
You talk about that bullet hitting the pavement as though that is something which happened close to the car. Unless there were two bullets hitting different areas of pavement, the one I'm familiar and has been well documented is where a bullet struck the curb near the triple underpass and a fragment of which hit James Tague in his cheek.
@ChuckyJesus666 ------the prez had 2 abrasions on his face from flying debris (misses). The Teague bullet, I believe was an intentional miss. hard to believe though. the little girls film that holds several silenced shots on it
Grrrrrrr. If Tina would have kept her camera on, she would have gotten a great view of the Grassy Knoll and the fatal shot ; and if Zapruder would have kept his camera on with his horizontal span, he would have captured behind the stock fence of the Grassy Knoll XD irony...lol
These are very interesting videos. I quite agree with your analysis of the assassination. Do you have any suggestions for some good readings on the assassination that you agree with and go in tandem with your analysis? I'd like to continue my research in this
A friend and I were talking about the assassination just this morning. Your series of the 38 videos is a professional comparative analysis of all theories and I learned quite a lot, a lot to contemplate. Thanks for a really good job.
Think about this; the metal jacketed " Single or Magic Bullet" supposedly caused all those wounds to Kennedy and Connally, and was found in excellent shape, yet the same jacketed bullet exploded Kennedy's head and fragmented into many small pieces. Just doesn't figure to me.
Hmm.. if you have quicktime (free download at apple) installed, go to jfkhistory(.)com and then click on the graphic in the top article. That will get you to a better resolution version that is not broken into different parts.
@immovable1 i to have been watch n alot of these videos and i have seen problems with my comments or the videos just stops.. but keep watch n.. kennedy dies if we as people dont keep watch n.. the final shot if you look in the grass there is a white rock used as a marker.. the time the front of the car hits that rock is the time for the sniper to fire in real time of the car speed..any sniper knows you shoot at a moveing target you shoot ahead of it..
Your videos are great but do you really think in this case that the sniper would not TEST or Calibrate his weapon beforehand for a job and shot this huge?
Were all the "professional" snipers too busy to do this job that day?
@bobharris77 Excellent analysis! It is possible for human reasons, nervousness at the task at hand, a new or unfamiliar weapon, unfamiliarity with using a silencer, potential witnesses who could spot the shooter(s)
@MrCluster101 if fireing through a baffel type supressor you damage some of the rubber disks inside then the very next shot will be different than the previous. and there would be no way to determine it damage occured. lets face it if your using a supressor your winging it. in all likely hood it was tested and sighted for its last shot but not the next one.
@datzfast the shooter had to compensate on the fly if that's not a professional i dont now what is.so, what were all the professionals doing on the day kennedy was shot, well they were earning a living.
Bob I like your research, however, when you talk about when mr and mrs kennedy have a significant reaction when raising his left hand and both turning their heads, him shielding his face, do you think it could be the sun? From what I can tell, it seems as though the sun gets really bright at that same moment, as if maybe they were coming into a break in buildings or the clouds parting. Interested to hear your response!
@MrTonyvila Mrs. Kennedy testified that she was looking to her left when she heard that first noise.
And JFK's reaction then is a good match for when Kellerman heard him say, "My God I've been hit". I doubt he could have said anything after the bullet went through his throat.
Besides that, Kennedy was a military man who saw combat in WWII. Shielding one's face with one's hand against a gunshot is not only futile, but doesn't strike me as the way an ex-Navy would react to the sound of gunfire.
The Z-Film copy you are using in this video appears to be excellent quality, one even can see the reflection of the region beside the limo. I'm surprised to see what looks like another dark limo that drives beside JFKs limo in the reflection. Normally you would see the bystanders on the pavement. Maybe it is just a misperception on my part but looks like another car.
Your take on the possible timing of the first two shots is quite plausible, One nitpick: I disagree that JFK is shielding his face in Z193. The perspective makes it look that way, but actually his face is to the left of his hand (palm out to the crowd, he was waving)and several inches back. I don't think he is reacting to a shot at that point; to me it looks like his reaction starts just before they come out from behind the sign.
i agree with you. It does not look as if he is shielding his face, but just in the midst of a waving movement, or he was about to drive his hand through his hair as he often used to do it.
And i think he is smiling and doesn't make a grim face.
THe only thing I want to know is : WHO KILL JFK ans WHY ? I dont care about number of shots. WHO kill this man and WHY Y
Thank.
RAREpicture 3 weeks ago
"I don't we're seeing a grimace rather than a smile." I doubt it entirely. "...is clearly shielding his face with his right hand." Or... he's waving with his hand to the people who are cheering and waving at him. "We seem to have seen two distinct reactions by President Kennedy." No we haven't. We've seen a guy waving at people who are cheering loudly and waving to him. Unless, of course, you WANT to see something different in a grainy, COMPLETELY undiscernable video (like this one). Sad.
UileagPPRG 1 month ago
@UileagPPRG Uh huh - so he just heard a 130 decibel gunshot and that made him grin ear to ear???
Look again at the position of his right hand shielding his face as he twisted to his right. That had to have been the most convoluted "wave" JFK ever made in his life:-)
Cosmosity 1 month ago
@Cosmosity Oh, and btw, this is bobharris77 on my alternate account.
Cosmosity 1 month ago
@Cosmosity My point is that you are making some assumptions based on poor-quality video and rather wild supposition. Further, I have no idea as to whether or not JFK heard a 130dB gunshot (gunshots AND firecrackers both come in on average at around 140dB, incidentally). But, more importantly, neither do you or anyone else know if he heard a 130dB gunshot. The only one who knows if he heard it was him, and he can't tell us. When *assumptions* are presented as evidence, it ruins credibility.
UileagPPRG 1 month ago
possible shileding by hand from the sun??...interesting that the motocop does not look right or move at at all, excpet everybody elses??? strange or cop may have been deaf?
torpedodropkick 1 month ago
BAAM!!! NOT EPIC FAIL!
cookiemonster123446 2 months ago
why would he shield his face with his hand? im sure he wasnt that stupid to think that would save him
Aimzinian 2 months ago
You make too many leaps of assumption here.
1. Your analysis of JFK's 'reactions' is very poor. He is just waving.
2. Suggesting he is reacting to a missed shot with a suppressed (silent) rifle requires absolutely no proof, and is a leap too far in your imagination.
Unfortunately, this kind of shoddy analysis only serves to detract even further from the facts of what happened, Please stick to what can be proved, not what you assume.
banditobandito22 2 months ago
So you just ignore the witnesses seeing and hearing the shots from the TSBD building? No one heard shots from the Daltex building
no288 2 months ago
Once again completely stupid suggestions with zero evidence. Drawing conclusions from things that clearly didn't even happen!
Firstly, Kennedy was smiling and waving, not 'covering his face'
Secondly: 'A bullet was fired and missed' from which you conclude 'the ONLY' plausible explanation was a dodgy suppressed weapon. I have another 'plausible' explanation. No- one fired, no-one missed at the points you claim.
You may as well conclude a rocket launcher was also fired, but also missed!
banditobandito22 2 months ago
Speculation; hearsay...this tragic incident has become a cottage industry. The forensic evidence all leads back to the 6th floor of the School Book Depository. It was a sloppy operation done by amateur LHO.
clev9980 2 months ago
bob i always watch yur videos on jfk very informative. u do real detailed work. excellent. shud have website with all evidence, sources n info. keep it up man, thanks for your service to the country with this great work, and same to all devoted researchers, it for our children, our society n our future!
mikefan09 3 months ago
a silencer would make sense and rightly said they can misfire
gentle7ways7 4 months ago
These Evil LBJ statements WE believe refers to the murder of JFK
"It is the Melancholy law of human societies to be compeled sometimes to chose a great evil in order to ward off a greater evil"
YOU want to see a guilty MAN? check this out , = LBJ coments on JFK assasination 1969.wmv
LBJ Evil joke about JFK
"I told? him that morning at breakfast...Son, I'm afraid this just ant' your day. Your going to the morgue and I'm going back to the White House"
cruisersism 5 months ago
I think its pretty obvious there was more than 1 shooter. No way did Oswald hit JFK wit that pos Carcano. There were 2 or 3 teams, with the final [kill] shot coming from front right. Nice work Mr. Harris. A plot Machiavelli would be proud of.
BookerT48 5 months ago
I am surprised James Tague heard the first shot, given he was prob the furthest away person from the Dal-Tex building. Did he have the benefit of the u/pass for amplification of the noise. Was he hit by the kerbstone fragments fired from that bullet, or the 2nd one?
moyadapne 6 months ago
@moyadapne Let me answer that question for Mr. Harris, I think the first shot that most people heard hit James in the right cheek as reported, It was only a minor wound though, correct me im wrong....
Zac757 5 months ago
@Zac757 He did have a mark on his cheek.. he claims from a fragment of kerbstone hit by a bullet. (Although didn't know he'd been 'hit' until it was pointed out to him.) What concerns me is that he says he heard a shot, but many people even closer to him didn't. (Hill, Brehm, Moorman etc.) Or heard a 'firecracker'. Love your 3 strike rule. Would that we could apply that to life in general. More room on the planet for you and me! If I'm a good boy.
moyadapne 5 months ago
was george hickey on the side running board of the follow-up car? if so, what position?
hitlersucks101 7 months ago
just a question really when you show the car from an aerial view as it turns th corner you have one very dull looking red car parked in a odd place its not a parking space like the rest of the cars parked to the side of teh road...but i think you on the right track good work,,;)
kirstyghostguru 7 months ago
Try as i might I just don't see a grimace on JFK's face at Z180. Your conclusions hinge on that grimace so I would expect it to be more pronounced and unequivical.
superchitownhustler 7 months ago
there was no supressor because there are no barrel threads on the rifle lee oswold used and all of what your saying is completly false,,,, wacth some other videos and learn your facts
MustyM8 8 months ago
Thank you Mr. Harris
12chapiman 10 months ago
my brother is a sophmore in high school and is studying all about this. ive been watching many videos all day. i must say, this one makes the most sense to me. our governent sucks.
cas88dogs 10 months ago
Your assumptions reviewing Kennedy's ''reactions'' during the first moments of the Zapruder are just that ...ASSUMPTIONS! Its very clear & OBVIOUS when watching the new, improved digital prints of that home movie that the president is WAVING to the crowd to his right....NOT reacting to a bullet! When he finally comes into view AFTER the road sign.....hes REACTING to the first shot to strike him by raising his arms to his throat. (Conally ALSO reacts at the SAME moment....the magic bullet?) Maybe
FOSEEBOY 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If he was using a silencer..how did the president hear a noice that made him react ?
GazStranik 1 year ago
Comment removed
GazStranik 1 year ago
the only way to find out what happen that day
is someone build a time machine!
vincent860906 1 year ago
@vincent860906 or get your government to tell the truth
ComradeErskine 11 months ago
I also believe that it is very possible that the gunman could have used a homemade suppressor which can cause a “disastrous misalignment problem.” So if the gunman fired twice and horribly missed by using a homemade suppressor and not a screw on, then the gunman possibly could have easily disconnected the suppresser off of the weapon and fired another shot in quick succession.
OneArmDeeJay 1 year ago
I believe the key words here are “sound suppressor” not silencer. When people of today hear the word silencer they think of modern day versions and the sounds that they make based off of examples in Hollywood movies, video games, or perhaps thru real life experiences. Remember a sound suppressor back then isn’t necessarily going to so silent that people would not be able to hear anything.
OneArmDeeJay 1 year ago
so what do you suggest? do you think it was all planed and if was what was the reason that they assassinated him,the videos where sabotage as you showed could he have worked alone? i he ad a partner who might it been? was there ever a time they thought i could have been Kennedy wife?
SusioPablo1979 1 year ago
Officer J.D.TIPPET shot Kennedy from the grassyknoll
slimshadee2008 1 year ago
Based on the information of your film i am concluding that, he had suppressor on during the first 2 shots, (if there were), then the sniper may have taken it off, correctly taking it off would only take maybe 10-20 seconds. I would assume that after missing two shots based on experienced, your fingers tend to be harder to control, but still its not difficult to remove it. OR there was a differnt rifle all together.
WildBrooksy 1 year ago
Based on the information of your film i am concluding that, he had suppressor on during the first 2 shots, (if there were), then the sniper may have taken it off, correctly taking it off would only take maybe 10-20 seconds. I would assume that after missing two shots based on experienced, your fingers tend to be harder to control, but still its not difficult to remove it. OR there was a differnt rifle all together.
WildBrooksy 1 year ago
It would be interesting to see if there were still pock-marks on the pavement from the missed shots......or conversely, if there was a work order to resurface Elm St.
Brynstigator 1 year ago
to bad they didn't have HD cams in the 60's.
jayrocks111 1 year ago
Is there evidence of a bullet impact anywhere along the paved road?
ThePesceman3 1 year ago
Key question Bob: Was there any damage to the pavement in here, like there was to the curb below the railway bridge? Also are there not undamaged copies of the Hughes film, at least without the burns shown here? Powerful evidence though.
animatetime 1 year ago
(or rather they were going on at the same time) shows the prez taking debris from the missed shots but not doing anything about it or saying anything about. strange huh!? I think another missed shot (the one that dented the windshield) the prez also realised but didn't say anything or do anything. the prez knew. god help me for posting this but he knew and should have cancelled the tour of Dealey plaza.(there were several reasons why the S. S. should never have let this go on.)
redbugiii 1 year ago
a good suppressor combined with the propper sub sonic ammo will be very quiet but oswald used standard velocity ammo , the bullet was still breaking the sound barier but the report is more like a firecracker since the suppressor is still moderating the sound at a certain level.
mysticsailor1983 1 year ago
quick question... if he was using a noise suppressor, how is it that they heard the shot with all the noise?
buttonupshirt 1 year ago
@buttonupshirt I don't know which shot you are referring to. The shots at 285 and after, were not fired from a suppressed weapon. The shot at 160 was heard by some because it shattered when it hit the pavement, generating "sparks" and sounded like a firecracker although it was not loud enough to provoke startle reactions as did the shots at 285 and 312.
Many witnesses like Clint Hill, Charles Brehm, Mary Moorman and others, didn't hear it at all.
bobharris77 1 year ago 4
they saboed your vid bob , it's stops playin bout 1:43
donewithitall1 1 year ago
@donewithitall1 Hmm... I checked it just now and it ran fine. Do you have the latest flash player?
bobharris77 1 year ago
@bobharris77 great stuff man, good reaserch and well put together very good
EricUmfress 9 months ago
@donewithitall1 sometimes I watch films on youtube and they just randomly stop halfway through for no apparent reason and repeated attempts have the same result. I just have to give up and try another day.
TonyBananas101 1 year ago
So If Aswalled used a silencer then he shot twice, missed, screwed It off and just shot without the silincer right?
Grimreaper905 1 year ago
@Grimreaper905 Oswald didn't use a silencer.
bobharris77 1 year ago
@bobharris77 _____and neither did Fields-------but someone did. the dude from the Daltex blding who missed on pourpose? twice! then hit the prez in the back. strange--like the jfk film by O. Stone says "It was a Turkey Shoot"
redbugiii 1 year ago
@bobharris77 oswald didnt kill him. oswald was accused and eventually got shot by a bystander when transferring prisons. Now thats why criminals are carried out in bulletproof vests these days. Hope This Helps!!!
dumdumco2 1 year ago
@Grimreaper905 yeah he fired off two shots with the silencer, unscrewed it, aimed and fired again, all in 5.8 seconds. Hmmmm, don't think so.
TonyBananas101 1 year ago
@Scottthefish How did you make that determination?
Cosmosity 1 year ago
Bob,
Love the videos, watched for a long time.
Question...Which shot hit the limo winshield and where do u think it came from?
2 misses, throat shot, Governor shot, pres head shot, Teague at the underpass grazed. (I assume by one of the two misses). The limo windshield could be the second miss. Guessing. So we're looking at atleast 5 shots, possibly 7 if the two misses were not Teague and the windshield. What do u think??
hcoptertx 1 year ago
You talk about that bullet hitting the pavement as though that is something which happened close to the car. Unless there were two bullets hitting different areas of pavement, the one I'm familiar and has been well documented is where a bullet struck the curb near the triple underpass and a fragment of which hit James Tague in his cheek.
ChuckyJesus666 1 year ago
@ChuckyJesus666 ------the prez had 2 abrasions on his face from flying debris (misses). The Teague bullet, I believe was an intentional miss. hard to believe though. the little girls film that holds several silenced shots on it
redbugiii 1 year ago
Thank Bob, The Deltex building is the key... (for me) your work is spot on. Thanks again
DRpokeme 1 year ago
When the JFK drops his right hand it's probably the first time he's heard an audible gunshot, a shot which obviously missed it's target.
squirevet 1 year ago
Grrrrrrr. If Tina would have kept her camera on, she would have gotten a great view of the Grassy Knoll and the fatal shot ; and if Zapruder would have kept his camera on with his horizontal span, he would have captured behind the stock fence of the Grassy Knoll XD irony...lol
koshan1986 1 year ago
These are very interesting videos. I quite agree with your analysis of the assassination. Do you have any suggestions for some good readings on the assassination that you agree with and go in tandem with your analysis? I'd like to continue my research in this
DisneyCruise07 1 year ago
A friend and I were talking about the assassination just this morning. Your series of the 38 videos is a professional comparative analysis of all theories and I learned quite a lot, a lot to contemplate. Thanks for a really good job.
IAmIsNigh 1 year ago
this is the first JFK conspiracy i've watched and now my eyes are going to be open to every JFK footage of that day Thanks buddy
spinert 2 years ago
Think about this; the metal jacketed " Single or Magic Bullet" supposedly caused all those wounds to Kennedy and Connally, and was found in excellent shape, yet the same jacketed bullet exploded Kennedy's head and fragmented into many small pieces. Just doesn't figure to me.
jvs257 2 years ago 2
this video stops playing at 6:35 i tried several times to replay it.
immovable1 2 years ago
Hmm.. if you have quicktime (free download at apple) installed, go to jfkhistory(.)com and then click on the graphic in the top article. That will get you to a better resolution version that is not broken into different parts.
bobharris77 2 years ago
@immovable1 i to have been watch n alot of these videos and i have seen problems with my comments or the videos just stops.. but keep watch n.. kennedy dies if we as people dont keep watch n.. the final shot if you look in the grass there is a white rock used as a marker.. the time the front of the car hits that rock is the time for the sniper to fire in real time of the car speed..any sniper knows you shoot at a moveing target you shoot ahead of it..
allaroundhandy 2 years ago
@ 8:42 the shooter at the picket fence could have made the throat shot through the windshield.
themeaningoflife38 2 years ago
Comment removed
phospholipasec 2 years ago
best video.......... nice research man keep it up
alienwarefan 2 years ago
Your videos are great but do you really think in this case that the sniper would not TEST or Calibrate his weapon beforehand for a job and shot this huge?
Were all the "professional" snipers too busy to do this job that day?
MrCluster101 2 years ago
Listen to Mark White. If the guy reassembled the rifle in DP, he was taking a chance. His alternative was to carry it in fully assembled.
I am open to other reasons for why he missed the entire limo twice.
bobharris77 2 years ago
@bobharris77 Excellent analysis! It is possible for human reasons, nervousness at the task at hand, a new or unfamiliar weapon, unfamiliarity with using a silencer, potential witnesses who could spot the shooter(s)
kms250 2 years ago
@MrCluster101 if fireing through a baffel type supressor you damage some of the rubber disks inside then the very next shot will be different than the previous. and there would be no way to determine it damage occured. lets face it if your using a supressor your winging it. in all likely hood it was tested and sighted for its last shot but not the next one.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast the shooter had to compensate on the fly if that's not a professional i dont now what is.so, what were all the professionals doing on the day kennedy was shot, well they were earning a living.
datzfast 1 year ago
Best JFK video I've seen yet. Thanks.
D0ublezer0x 2 years ago
great video bob. thx
nats316 2 years ago
Bob I like your research, however, when you talk about when mr and mrs kennedy have a significant reaction when raising his left hand and both turning their heads, him shielding his face, do you think it could be the sun? From what I can tell, it seems as though the sun gets really bright at that same moment, as if maybe they were coming into a break in buildings or the clouds parting. Interested to hear your response!
MrTonyvila 2 years ago
@MrTonyvila Mrs. Kennedy testified that she was looking to her left when she heard that first noise.
And JFK's reaction then is a good match for when Kellerman heard him say, "My God I've been hit". I doubt he could have said anything after the bullet went through his throat.
bobharris77 2 years ago
Interesting analysis!
Thanks for your hard work.
proudfootz 2 years ago 2
Besides that, Kennedy was a military man who saw combat in WWII. Shielding one's face with one's hand against a gunshot is not only futile, but doesn't strike me as the way an ex-Navy would react to the sound of gunfire.
lesorciercalifornien 2 years ago
Those kinds of reactions are reflexive. Of course, the victim doesn't think to himself that he can block a bullet with his hands.
And JFK was only spattered with debris then. I doubt that he was actually wounded as he would be a couple seconds later.
bobharris77 2 years ago
@lesorciercalifornien have you ever watched combat footage from iraq. soldiers do use hands to sheid faces
datzfast 1 year ago
very impressive analysis !
PS:
The Z-Film copy you are using in this video appears to be excellent quality, one even can see the reflection of the region beside the limo. I'm surprised to see what looks like another dark limo that drives beside JFKs limo in the reflection. Normally you would see the bystanders on the pavement. Maybe it is just a misperception on my part but looks like another car.
DoubleR666 2 years ago
Your take on the possible timing of the first two shots is quite plausible, One nitpick: I disagree that JFK is shielding his face in Z193. The perspective makes it look that way, but actually his face is to the left of his hand (palm out to the crowd, he was waving)and several inches back. I don't think he is reacting to a shot at that point; to me it looks like his reaction starts just before they come out from behind the sign.
lesorciercalifornien 2 years ago
i agree with you. It does not look as if he is shielding his face, but just in the midst of a waving movement, or he was about to drive his hand through his hair as he often used to do it.
And i think he is smiling and doesn't make a grim face.
DoubleR666 2 years ago