anybody who believes the moon landing's were a hoax,is missing a few brain cells,even the Japanese took scans and photographs of the Apollo sites,in one scan that JAX took of one of the landing sites,it matched perfectly with a photo of the same area taken by one of the Apollo astronauts taken at ground level.The Japanese said the only way that photograph could have been made was by someone standing on the moon.400,000 people worked on Apollo,amazing achievement
@OpenTheTrollGate, a colony is exponentially more difficult, costly & dangerous, but possible. How will a colony prove that Apollo was real? How would you even be convinced that a colony is even there? Photos, video, rock samples, independent tracking, retroreflectors & massive rockets? Been there-done that.
@OpenTheTrollGate, you can offhandedly dismiss evidence or you can demonstrate that the evidence is false. If you can't do the latter, you have no grounds to do the former.
@OpenTheTrollGate, do you plan on just name-calling, or can you carry on a civil discussion? If you can't, we're done.
If I may ask a question: If any agency from any country or any private company ever want to the moon--past, present or future--what would you consider proof that they actually did it?
If any agency from any country or any private company ever want to the moon--past, present or future--what would you consider proof that they actually did it?
@OpenTheTrollGate, okay, apparently you won't answer my question for whatever reason.
I can only assume that if China, India, Japan or any country told you they landed on the moon, you would not accept any evidence. What it comes down to is not "proof," but what convinces you or persuades you. All I'm asking is what is sufficient for you. You don't seem willing to answer, so why are we having this discussion?
this is idiotic, they manipulated the speed of the camera you turd faces. go shove broken glass up ur pissholes you nerdy loser faggits! hahahaha LOSERS! TRY GETTING A LIFE OR GETTING A GIRL YOU LOSERS fyi neil and buzz ass fucked in low earth orbit the whole time, they wanted to fuck on the moon but couldnt make it.
Very nice video too shay no hoax believer is going to watch this and understand it because anyone who has even just a bit knowlege of physics doesnt believe it was a hoax. Id love to see in the description also the fact about the vacuum as it can be seen very nicely with the plastic bag and of course the hammer and feather.
I have no idea what the hell you're talking about. I just looked at other comments after 2 painful minutes of being confused. Do you really not believe in the moon?
@BlueDragonFuze Yeah but that's not actual proof that they're real. There could be a large, invisible creature holding a massive spotlight that appears to be the sun to us. The same creature might have a gigantic fog machine that simulates clouds too. These NASA guys discovered the creature which is why they had to fake the moonlandings, to convince us that the creature is non-existent. I however am on to their sneaky conspiracy.
@NoAtheists LOL!!!!!! A creature??? Dude!! Are you serious?? Where did you read this? Now Im serious lol! No offense or anything, but Im curious now lol. I apologize, but Im afraid I dont believe there is a creature that massive in outer space(I saw outer space, because thats where the sun is.). Its just not possible. Wait......were you being sarcastic? Just checking is all lol. I want that article you saw this news from XD!
@BlueDragonFuze I said it was invisible, so of course you can't SEE the creature. Word has it that it's a unicorn, actually. A pink one. But it has a whole bunch of extra hands, and it uses them to hold things in place (like the spotlight that you think is the sun).
@NoAtheists lol You're funny! Well if you cant show your sources, then I have no choice but to not believe your credibility lol. Love your sarcasm lol.
irrefutable proof that this vid is just propagandist bs. it would only take 3 men to fake it- the astronauts. how is that so hard to beleive given the fact that nasa themselves now admit that aluminum sheilding would intensify the radiation levels within the craft? americas lied their way through the past 100 years, why would this be any different? furthermore you dont need a retro-reflector to bounce lasers off the moon, its been done. buzz and neil just assfucked here on earth cuz theyre homos
*sigh* The most advanced physics I have studied is on high school level, and even that is enough to make me absolutely sure that the moon landings really did happen!
I haven't found ONE SINGLE inconsistency anywhere, and neither has any physicist - it would only take ONE physicist who would spot ONE mistake and this whole hoax babble would've been an official truth, most likely only a few DAYS after the FIRST moon landing.
So to all you hoaxers - sit down. shut up, and study some physics.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but the only logical way it works out if was filmed in a low gravity environment five sixths of the way between earth and outer space where the gravity's six times lower.
Which means it wasn't filmed on the moon otherwise you would have been able to see the stars.
The photographs and footages show no stars in them because they were exposed for the daylight lit lunar scenes. This badly underexposes any stars in the sky. Watch all the thousands of photographs made by Space Shuttle missions or ISS. You won't find many starry images there either.
In fact I have never seen any photograph taken in space that includes properly exposed sunlit objects and stars. The 1st I ever saw were the Gemini 12 EVA footages which are starless as well.
@Rob260259 Yes but you've missed my point: If it wasn't filmed on the moon, then it must have been filmed in a studio that was situated where the earth's gravity is one sixth of that of the surface, eg very deep down in the earth's mantle, or on a platform very high up. Or more likely, on an aeroplane doing parabolic dives, like in Apollo 13. Or if Kubrick was involved, some kind of split scan process. There's no other explanation, is there?
Yes, there is a very 'simple' explanation. This was filmed on the Moon. In a vacuum, with 1/6th gravity. Many, many footages prove that. It was TOTALLY impossible to fake this on such a scale.
@Rob260259 That's just such a conventionalist viewpoint! It could easily have been filmed in the fuselage of a "Beluga" transport plane which would provide ample space to film it, particularly if the sets were miniaturised. After all the moon dust would have sucked the astronauts down like in the 1960 film "12 to the Moon" and they would have never been seen again, would they?
Conventional...? No, it's scientific above all. Are you serious? Filming astronauts on a stage in an aircraft? There are videos of astronauts walking 100 yards or more. Think of the best special effects movies that you have ever seen. Now think of the visual errors that even the casual uninformed audience can see in these films. Would it be possible in 1969 to do a movie that would have convinced astronomers? I don't think so.
I'm sorry, but I have to laugh at your outrageous theory.
Try to fake 840 pounds of rocks and 6 foot intact core tubes and have them examined by geologists and petrochemists around the world. Try to fake tracking real time telemetry with biomedical data. Try to fake sixty scientific experiments on the surface of the Moon and fake the data received from them. Try to fake satellites launched from the SIM bays into lunar orbit.
@Rob260259@Rob260259 I think you'll find the science populariser and adherent to post-Humean critical rationalism, Carl Sagan, and the bemomocled Astronomer Royale Sir Patrick Moore fell hook, line and sinker for Stanley Kubrick's live studio rendition of the Apollo 11 landings:
watch?v=D3fUG6spgLs
The technology was definitely available to fake the moon landings, especially with a $60 billion budget.
Why did the film not melt in the camera? Melt, like the "no wires" counter conspiracy claim...
You don't have a clue, have you..? Where did that $60 billion go? And have you ever heard of passive thermal control? The thermal environment on the Moon is not the same as in Earth orbit even though both places are in space at the same average distance from the sun. You have to consider radiation in two distinct spectral bands.
Google it all. Don't just say "impossible" or "fake" because you don't comprehend.
@Rob260259 I'm sorry but the $60 billion would have sufficed to photo-realistically animate whole moon landings in real time - if you have a whole football stadium full of physics trained animators and and special effects artists it could have all been rendered and broadcast in the time it takes for the signal to get from the moon to the earth. The evidence that the $60 billion went to the moon is very sketchy - excuse the pun!
How else would you explain the comical appearance of the astronauts?
- You mean the press conference? These pilots are not media whores, as are many of todays talentless wannabes. What you don't understand, these men were not raised to beat their chest, or do the funk dance for their achievements. They are modest, humble & focused on the task at hand. They don't show emotion or show their personal side. Otherwise NASA wouldn't' let them fly. Any little distraction could cost them their lives & impede the entire project.
Try to fool people at the University of Cambridge, England, the University of Durham, England, the Geologic Survey in Ottawa, Canada, the Australian National University in Canberra. And try to fool the researchers in Manchester at the Universityl of Manchester, England, the University of Berne, Switzerland, the University of Cologne, Germany, the people at the Max Planke Institute Fur Chemie in Mainz, Germany. Credible institutions and people. But here is Hewpie. With his own 'Twoof'.
How are you doing? I've had a lovely break from conspirasalysing about the moon, but now I'm back!
So let's go straight back into the arguement: Where was I?
It seems like the moon landing conspiracy must have been a joke that had gone too far, and no-one, even on their death beds, could bring themselves to admit it. I expect that there must have been a few wry and telling smirks, though.
"Carl Sagan, and the bemomocled Astronomer Royale Sir Patrick Moore fell hook, line and sinker for Stanley Kubrick's live studio rendition of the Apollo 11 landings"
LOL :D
I hope you realize that documentary is a farce by the French director William Karel...
If you actually watch it till the end everyone involved is having a laugh at how much silliness they stuffed into one film! :D
I guess the one who fell hook, line and sinker is you, to William Karel, hehe.
Love videos like this. Moon hoax believers are a sad deluded bunch, when proof like this is laid before them they usually jump to another hoax claim, when that one is proven wrong they jump to another, it's goes around in circles, we're dealing with a modern day belief system here, a mythology, a quasi religion.
Payback..? You're a funny loser. Pictures of a telescope will exactly match and acknowledge the LRO photos. Just as the LRO photos exactly match the Japanese Kaguya pictures. And just like the Apollo 15 photos match the Kaguya.
And again; that is exactly what Stray, Pt1 and Un4 wrote to me just months before LRO. In the mean time: prvide one (1) ounce of evidence that the Moon landings were faked.
You provide one ounce of evidence that the Moon landing is not faked, not only stupid claims, you only can back up with your power of the compact majority.
One ounce? How about 840 pounds of rocks and 6 foot intact core tubes brought back? Impossible to do with unmanned probes. Apollo was massive. Videos and pictures taken, tracking real time telemetry, 60 scientific experiments left on the surface of the Moon and the data received from them, satellites launched from the SIM bays into lunar orbit, reflectors left at the landing sites, etc. etc.
One ounce...? The technical data has been available for reviews for decades, some of it in advance of the landings. Planned TV coverage. Several generations of engineers and scientists familiar with the geologic studies of celestial bodies have studied the data. And here comes some loser Kennjohnsen and says it's all fake. Yeah... Do you even have a clue what highly directional telemetry implies? Telemetry including biometric data from humans, real time?
I LOVE this video. Finally somebody using physics, otherwise known as a REAL argument or piece of evidence. what I will say is this: maybe the moon hoax people aren't mentally ill, but I have NEVER seen a video of theirs with physics in it, or have I ever heard of an actual physicist supporting them. Not one of my professors believes the moon landings were fake.
Please watch a video of ANY sport. Humans can move quickly, I can't see anything wrong with the movie while it is showed in what would have to bee the right speed if it was taken on earth
This is a great video, but since all moon hoaxers are mentally ill, it won't make them understand any better. Moon hoaxers are sad people if you think about them. They wake up everyday thinking that every single thing that happens is a grand conspiracy. They wake up everyday thinking that some unseen hand is trying to kill them and/or put them in a FEMA camp. They don't believe that men could go to the moon, but they believe that this dastardly unseen group can do just about everything else.
@Mainsail76 . so let me get this straight.. you're saying that all moon hoaxers are mentally ill... and that if they mentally ill they are sad people? what kind of human being are you? obviously one who doesn't care about other people and the way they feel. at least we question everything around us rather than believe eveything we see. i think that wouldbe a sign of high intelligence wouldnt you? Rather than put down and bash people who beleive in the moon landing , we just like to put out
our opinion with peace but you guys like to put us down claming you are right and we are wrong. haha there is no sides here buddy . its just science and figuring life out. Did you that issac newton was MENtally ILL? what about winston cchurchill. all famous geniuses WHO questioned life around them and thought outside of the box. so keep following the herd sheep . we\ll choose our own path thanks
taking the space suit and the plss into consideration, an apollo eva astronaut would have weighed about 225 pounds. the wire should have been about a quarter of an inch thick to support that much weight.
even if such wires had been used, it would have needed at least the 80s technology to erase them from the videos. video manipulation technology was unheard of during the apollo era.
@kennjohnsen A: you probably don't pay much attention to english, do you? please go thru my comments again.
i said what i say for the "hoaxers" because i'm not one of them. i'm a firm believer in the apollo missions. so here's for you once more: -
what i stated was the converse: if these videos were to be filmed on the earth, then it'd have required so massive equipments, cranes, lifters, chains, pulleys and what not, that it'd have been more than impossible for nasa to fake it. (contd at B:)
@kennjohnsen B: if nasa wanted to fake it then the easiest way to go about it would have been simply to go to the moon, do the exploration and return. but then, if they could land on the moon, then why the hell would they "fake" it?
@kennjohnsen btw, did you get committed? i might be able to do something. of course, it's useless talking to you. call your parents so i could brief them about your state of despair. please do take your medications regularly.
@kennjohnsen i see you've begun to suffer hallucinations. instead of getting cranky, you might as well throw up some solid evidence about your belief in the "moon scam". i promise i'll converse with you keeping your viewpoint. but, there's a saying - a fool is born every minute, and two to take his place! you might as well be one of the three!! keep on posting crap; there's someone somewhere that'll always get your thoughts!!!
Everything in the Moon landing proves it's an impossibility......the capsule....is one, the number one proof I think is the space radiation. And it's confirmed by that no one has been outside the belt since this so-called Moon flight. Yes, there is an ordinary born every second, and you are definitely one of them. And there is a lot of Governments believing suckers backing you up, that's why we got this Government.
@kennjohnsen i was right! you should get committed before it's too late for you. keep on believing the hoax morons and conspiracy dumdeeheads. my belief comes from solid, scientific evidence. and that's probably much too massive to fit into your tiny skull. no education can be drummed into pea brains like yours.
I am committed to expose you scammers in anyway it's possible, and certainly be there when it's proved it's a scam. You are a dumbhead owned by the state, you can't think, or don't want to thing, probably both.
@kennjohnsen and you're the only one thinkin', eh? you must look more stupid than you sound. it's probably a splinter in your eye that's causing you so much irritation. wash with water. it'll give you some relief.
@kennjohnsen by the way, do you have any solid physics background to back up your claims of the moon hoax? i bet you don't! you're like one of the so-called "truth criers" who think the next armageddon is on 12-12-12 or that "nibiru" is just about to devour earth. not much can be done for you hoaxers except wait till the moon xhd pics are released. you'll repent!
Do you got any ...solid...physics background to back up your claims of the Moon landing ? other than what you been told by the hoaxer NASA, I bet you don't. I got no idea about when Armageddon is coming, or if ever, all I know it's in the Bible. And I got no idea about Nibiru coming or not, all I know it's in the Sumerian script. But you seem to know, how the hell do you know ? What Moon xhd pics are released, the same stupid shit as all the others.
@kennjohnsen it's quite allright. I can understand. other than what you get inspired by stupid.III grade dropouts like rene, sibrel, kaysing et al, you've absolutely got no gray matter.
@kennjohnsen did he get his ph.d in the same mental institution that i told you to get admitted to? are you a ph.d as well? from the same mental institution? ok, i get it now.
i've one thing to say to you: people like you are the ones that gave birth to the illuminati imagination. keep on believing your "truth". i'll wait for the day when the truth dawns on you! ciao!
@kennjohnsen and i believe you passed the ph.d that nasa scientists have? and you're the expert stating the facts that men can't go past the van allen belts? i don't think you're crazy. i can claim a billion dollars that YOU ARE CRAZY! and not only that you believe in something which have easily been refuted time and again. surface with one positive, clinching evidence against any apollo mission and i'll accept my defeat. otherwise you're like all the HBs - non-bailable soul!
so you know how to use swears, huh? grown up, eh? ok, since you're so stubborn, let me get this easy-way into your peabrain. you prove to me nothing can go past the vab and i'll accept my error. if not, you're the one licking the sh*t outta jack, your ass! i know you can't prove the contrary, so i'll let you consult your "mensa experts" to get started. good luck jumpin' jack!
@kennjohnsen the whole world of reputed scientists know and can provide enough evidence of apollo missions to stuff up your sorry *ss to satiate you, numbskull! but since you don't wanna medicate your eardrums, i'll continue enjoying our mutual-hurls of swears! :-)
@kennjohnsen yeah, and you invented what the world uses today, right from cellular fones to shaving razors to cfls, battery cars, and hell what, even the metro! you seem to be enjoying getting drowned in your honey dreams. why don't you come out and provide one ounce of evidence about anything that can prove the moonwalks were faked? but you won't, since you can't! no hoaxer can! every such false claims have been refuted time and again, right from the fluttering flag to shadows to jumps &c.
I see, James van Hoften makes false claims. He is not the only one making those claims. Man cannot travel in space beyond the belt, before a way is found to protect them against space radiation. Only a little thinking and deeper understanding makes that clear, which you obviously are not capable of.
@kennjohnsen no one has been beyond the vab since then because no one needs to. you see, returning to the moon once again just to prove we already went would only waste taxpayers' money. and you stupid morons would even then never believe and would call such a conciliatory mission as faked again like you have been doing after passing mensa.
you and i are here for the truth to surface. you believe what you do. i'll go with the facts. let's see who was right in his/her belief?
@kennjohnsen well, i tried not to be rude, but you've to know you started it (dumb thing etc)...
fact is apollo landings happened & the whole scientific world knows it's a fact. i was only trying to tell you that crying hoax won't get anyone anywhere. just because a few optical effects on the apollo mission films show up as anomalies, doesn't exactly disprove they happened. i've analyzed almost all the pictures and videos in nasa archive. i don't have an inch of doubt!
Well I got hundreds of inches of doubt, when I read James Van Hoften - John H Mauldin - Eleanor Blakely, I understand that the spase is a very...very hostile place. And that is completely logical to me, that it is a very radioactive place, that it shouldn't be is on the other hand completely illogical. And so goes for the Moon, a very radioactive place, As James Van Hoften says.....Man cannot travel in space before a way to protect him against radiation is found, he's never been the
Ok, but what about rest of camera crosses? Not all behind white objects? And what about wires(?) reflections 2m over astronauts ? Backpack antena was shorter
All he did was measure the height at the apex. The "slight downhill" wouldn't really matter because the height would be from the point that the bag was launched at and the apex.
The bag throwing is total nonsense, because you can never say what hight it was. That would only work if you throw it straight in the air. You can't measure the distance, cause you don't know if it's "slight downhill". You put a straight line into the background of a video and tell us how far that is? impossible on an unlevel surface.
I guess you back-calculated and filled in the calculated hight, right? That way your numbers always "fit".
Conspiracy theorist are not all hardheaded idiots. I looked into this. Now I see some proof. Moving on. Asking questions is good. Whats with all the people insulting people just for asking questions and being critical. It is good to question. We are lied to alot and mislead alot.
@EdwardSkye1 ....It might have been good to ask questions about the Moon landings 30 years ago but all questions as to the validity of the 6 landings have been thoroughly debunked since then. If you have some valid proof of a hoax perhaps you'd like to reveal it to with us since you would be the first person in history to possess this information. Care to share?
@teddysalad65 Of course I don't have proof. I saw proof of them being real. Sorry if I was vague. And how and when did you learn this info. Don't judge those going through learning process. Learning for oneself is good. So I disagree with you there. How about JFK has all that been thoroughly debunked yet?
The problem with conspiracy theorists is that there will never be sufficient proof for them to believe what they have already made up their mind about. For a normal person, pictures and video are pretty irrefutable evidence, but the conspiracy theorist can simply claim "fake" or "fabricated" for any evidence you show them. That is how they simply ignore evidence to maintain their preconceived notions.
@Boldenberg Can you empirically test the speed of light? Not personally, right? So how do you know that what is claimed to be the speed of light is the actual figure (within reasonable accuracy).
@Boldenberg Besides, I know the video shows some pretty heavy physics, but if you understood the math and physics being explained then there would be no denying it. I know engineers who are moon landing deniers and when I showed them this video it shut them up completely because they know they can't argue against physics. Willful ignorance is the only excuse.
@Boldenberg You can test lots of moon landing stuff yourself.
Try putting your foot in dry flour for i6nstance, that alone is proof that you can make deep footprints without water, which explains the moon footprints.
Also try holding a wire or something and let it swing - it swings a little faster than the wire in the video, right?
You can also throw plastic bags up in the air if you think it will be enjoyable - but you probably won't reach 4 meters. O_~
@Laurelindo I meant something along the line of testing the mirrors put there using some instrument (myself). Or handling a telescope (or whatever is needed) to look at the stuff they left there.
I do not prove the earth is appr. circular by looking at a football.
@Boldenberg or you could just do the math and figure out that the lunar descent module is too small on a too far Moon to be resolved by an average telescope (or even with Hubble). BUT you could build a satellite, equip it with a decent telescope and send it to the Moon to look down not from 384 000 km but 50(!) km, just as NASA did, and see the descent modules.
Or build your own observatory with the laser and the telescope.
You could do it - but nobody said it's either easy or cheap.
Hoax believers actually disprove themselves in a way;
I mean, if NASA were so smart that they could fool every scientist and professor in the world for almost half a century then they would sure as hell be smart enough to plan the moon landing.
Very nice :) Hope this helps to open the eyes of all those kids who have been manipulated into believing it was faked. Or at least a few of them...but maybe those intelligent enough to see the evidence here don't need to see it, 'cause they haven't been manipulated in the first place :) And the rest...try to think for a change, there are many proofs besides this one, and every conspiracy theory claim can be proven wrong or fake in a matter of minutes, literally
@Scorstin I can respect those who feel perplexed by certain moon landing footage, because those people simply aren't familiar with certain aspects of physics and want an explanation so they can undersand it (which is a very good thing, because this is how you learn and grow as a person) - it is when they refuse to listen and obstinately insist that they themselves are right that they start to become annoying.
They move too fast because they're on wires. This doesn't prove anything. What does prove the moon landings were faked was that if you look at the pictures of the lunar rovers on the "moon" you'll see there are no tire tracks. I would LOVE for you to explain that.
God bless you, cockroachafro!!! At last I get a response that's compassionate, level-headed and observant. Dad is now 88 years old and fading fast. His legacy and the legacies of so many others who put their lives on the line must be preserved. Again, thank you!
Thank you So MUCH for posting this video. My father was one of the team leaders during the first Moon landing, and I hate the implications he was part of a lie. Another piece of evidence is right in front of our eyes: Lunar dust is very fine, like talcum powder, but you'll notice it doesn't "plume" when kicked up by either an astronaut or the Moon Buggy. That can't be faked even with CGI today. NO AIR! Why can't we just be proud we went and stop this conspiracy foolishness?
A great big thank you to your father! and there is a reason you never see heaxers address the dust. Besides not billowing the dust also follows a parabolic arc that we would expect to see on the moon consistant with lunar gravity.But i guess Nasa just built a 1/6g set in a total vacume at area 51 hey?
again at 4:39 watch for the weeeeee at about 4:42 ... if Nasa gave us the whole thing on the frame it would be all over, yet any open mind can see enough to see the cloth yanked and the Nauts pulled off his feet .... game over, dont need physics, Nasa never counted on the net and their pathetic films of 40 years ago... tho they tried erasing tons of them haha
@pt1gard yes i can. the conservation of momentum! :) his flap was lose, he moves, his lose flap moves. don't you think nasa will come and watch all this thousands of times with rocket scientist before they ever made it public? lol
and thousand of moon hoaxers just jizzed their pants and ignore this evidence and go back to shouting we didn't land on the moon. don't they do that? lol
@amontaiyagala Nice video! I believe that Americans were on Moon. My only question is how can NASA explain similar landscape features ( rocks , hills) filmed (as they say) in the different places of the Moon. All conspiracy myths are busted but I newer heard how NASA explains that :(
the bag expands while flying in an airless vaccumm? comeon, this is getting a bit stupid. there is claerly wind resistance when he first throws it upward. if theres air resistance i think he can take that fake wrinkly suit off.
this is retarded.... they wouldn't automatically use the same slow motion speed for everything. they would shoot the action then adjust the film to make it the most believable
There is an incredible amount of documentation of Apollo including the thousands of people who took part in it. Anyone reviewing even a small amount of it should conclude that faking trips to the moon with so much internally consistent detail would be harder and less likely to succeed than actually going.
What a bunch of noonsense human landing was fake and we all know it, otherwise, where are pictures from japanese satelite of lunar equpment, sorry but we need some other source then USA, i stop beliving them after they said that iraq have bio wepons and whole world stormed them
The payload and fuel required for a trip to The Moon is astounding, with a one-way ticket only, and not coming back, talk to any physics professor and they will tell you, we cannot build a rocket that big to go that distance and back. that was in 2008, i doubt anyone went to the moon and back back in the 1970's C'mon People do some research before you babble about impossible rocket feats
anybody who believes the moon landing's were a hoax,is missing a few brain cells,even the Japanese took scans and photographs of the Apollo sites,in one scan that JAX took of one of the landing sites,it matched perfectly with a photo of the same area taken by one of the Apollo astronauts taken at ground level.The Japanese said the only way that photograph could have been made was by someone standing on the moon.400,000 people worked on Apollo,amazing achievement
inagod 6 days ago
@OpenTheTrollGate, a colony is exponentially more difficult, costly & dangerous, but possible. How will a colony prove that Apollo was real? How would you even be convinced that a colony is even there? Photos, video, rock samples, independent tracking, retroreflectors & massive rockets? Been there-done that.
LunarTuner 2 weeks ago
I find it hilarious that we took a wheelbarrow full of junk to throw around on the moon. Like the first thing we did was litter haha
AASlayden 3 weeks ago
Just showing video from NASA isnt irrefutable proof of anything. Its another point worth debating but as evidence its flimsy at best.
OpenTheTrollGate 1 month ago
@OpenTheTrollGate, you can offhandedly dismiss evidence or you can demonstrate that the evidence is false. If you can't do the latter, you have no grounds to do the former.
LunarTuner 2 weeks ago
@LunarTuner he doesn't have any evidence either, you dumbfuck.
OpenTheTrollGate 2 weeks ago
@LunarTuner LOL, I thought you were some idiot who responded to me in that video of a dude saying quantum mechanics was a religion.
OpenTheTrollGate 2 weeks ago
@LunarTuner no one can prove that they went on the moon either.
OpenTheTrollGate 2 weeks ago
@OpenTheTrollGate, do you plan on just name-calling, or can you carry on a civil discussion? If you can't, we're done.
If I may ask a question: If any agency from any country or any private company ever want to the moon--past, present or future--what would you consider proof that they actually did it?
LunarTuner 2 weeks ago
@LunarTuner prove it, but I know you can't, since all arguments imply a set of assumptions that are even more difficult to prove.
OpenTheTrollGate 2 weeks ago
@OpenTheTrollGate, I asked you a simple question...
If any agency from any country or any private company ever want to the moon--past, present or future--what would you consider proof that they actually did it?
Simple--what do you consider sufficient proof?
LunarTuner 2 weeks ago
@LunarTuner is there a proof proving god exists?
OpenTheTrollGate 2 weeks ago
@OpenTheTrollGate, okay, apparently you won't answer my question for whatever reason.
I can only assume that if China, India, Japan or any country told you they landed on the moon, you would not accept any evidence. What it comes down to is not "proof," but what convinces you or persuades you. All I'm asking is what is sufficient for you. You don't seem willing to answer, so why are we having this discussion?
LunarTuner 2 weeks ago
@LunarTuner a lunar colony would ber a good proof that we went there
OpenTheTrollGate 2 weeks ago
this is idiotic, they manipulated the speed of the camera you turd faces. go shove broken glass up ur pissholes you nerdy loser faggits! hahahaha LOSERS! TRY GETTING A LIFE OR GETTING A GIRL YOU LOSERS fyi neil and buzz ass fucked in low earth orbit the whole time, they wanted to fuck on the moon but couldnt make it.
MrToiletface 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Very nice video too shay no hoax believer is going to watch this and understand it because anyone who has even just a bit knowlege of physics doesnt believe it was a hoax. Id love to see in the description also the fact about the vacuum as it can be seen very nicely with the plastic bag and of course the hammer and feather.
o0Manfi0o 1 month ago
Make it so I can understand. The lamen
acidome 1 month ago
Love this video!!!!!!
51actual 1 month ago
We have all this technology yet we still bicker about the moon landing. Look back at planes, in 10 years they went from nothing to comercial.
kikook222 2 months ago
I have no idea what the hell you're talking about. I just looked at other comments after 2 painful minutes of being confused. Do you really not believe in the moon?
iamnotcoolandproud 2 months ago
Great vid.
salamanca1954 2 months ago
@@mattdickinsonfuckyou I assume your disbelief in the moon is sarcasm right?
BlueDragonFuze 2 months ago
@mattdickinsonfuckyou Go outside at night sometime and look into the sky. There's your proof. Btw the sun is real and so are clouds.
BlueDragonFuze 2 months ago
@BlueDragonFuze Yeah but that's not actual proof that they're real. There could be a large, invisible creature holding a massive spotlight that appears to be the sun to us. The same creature might have a gigantic fog machine that simulates clouds too. These NASA guys discovered the creature which is why they had to fake the moonlandings, to convince us that the creature is non-existent. I however am on to their sneaky conspiracy.
NoAtheists 1 month ago
@NoAtheists LOL!!!!!! A creature??? Dude!! Are you serious?? Where did you read this? Now Im serious lol! No offense or anything, but Im curious now lol. I apologize, but Im afraid I dont believe there is a creature that massive in outer space(I saw outer space, because thats where the sun is.). Its just not possible. Wait......were you being sarcastic? Just checking is all lol. I want that article you saw this news from XD!
BlueDragonFuze 1 month ago
@BlueDragonFuze I said it was invisible, so of course you can't SEE the creature. Word has it that it's a unicorn, actually. A pink one. But it has a whole bunch of extra hands, and it uses them to hold things in place (like the spotlight that you think is the sun).
NoAtheists 1 month ago
@BlueDragonFuze Sure, I COULD reveal my sources to you, but if I did, I'd have to kill you. It's that top-secret.
NoAtheists 1 month ago
@NoAtheists lol You're funny! Well if you cant show your sources, then I have no choice but to not believe your credibility lol. Love your sarcasm lol.
BlueDragonFuze 1 month ago
irrefutable proof that this vid is just propagandist bs. it would only take 3 men to fake it- the astronauts. how is that so hard to beleive given the fact that nasa themselves now admit that aluminum sheilding would intensify the radiation levels within the craft? americas lied their way through the past 100 years, why would this be any different? furthermore you dont need a retro-reflector to bounce lasers off the moon, its been done. buzz and neil just assfucked here on earth cuz theyre homos
MrToiletface 2 months ago
*sigh* The most advanced physics I have studied is on high school level, and even that is enough to make me absolutely sure that the moon landings really did happen!
I haven't found ONE SINGLE inconsistency anywhere, and neither has any physicist - it would only take ONE physicist who would spot ONE mistake and this whole hoax babble would've been an official truth, most likely only a few DAYS after the FIRST moon landing.
So to all you hoaxers - sit down. shut up, and study some physics.
Laurelindo 2 months ago
Comment removed
Laurelindo 2 months ago
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but the only logical way it works out if was filmed in a low gravity environment five sixths of the way between earth and outer space where the gravity's six times lower.
Which means it wasn't filmed on the moon otherwise you would have been able to see the stars.
Hewpie 3 months ago
@Hewpie
The photographs and footages show no stars in them because they were exposed for the daylight lit lunar scenes. This badly underexposes any stars in the sky. Watch all the thousands of photographs made by Space Shuttle missions or ISS. You won't find many starry images there either.
In fact I have never seen any photograph taken in space that includes properly exposed sunlit objects and stars. The 1st I ever saw were the Gemini 12 EVA footages which are starless as well.
Rob260259 3 months ago
@Rob260259 Yes but you've missed my point: If it wasn't filmed on the moon, then it must have been filmed in a studio that was situated where the earth's gravity is one sixth of that of the surface, eg very deep down in the earth's mantle, or on a platform very high up. Or more likely, on an aeroplane doing parabolic dives, like in Apollo 13. Or if Kubrick was involved, some kind of split scan process. There's no other explanation, is there?
Hewpie 3 months ago
@Hewpie
Yes, there is a very 'simple' explanation. This was filmed on the Moon. In a vacuum, with 1/6th gravity. Many, many footages prove that. It was TOTALLY impossible to fake this on such a scale.
Rob260259 3 months ago
@Rob260259 That's just such a conventionalist viewpoint! It could easily have been filmed in the fuselage of a "Beluga" transport plane which would provide ample space to film it, particularly if the sets were miniaturised. After all the moon dust would have sucked the astronauts down like in the 1960 film "12 to the Moon" and they would have never been seen again, would they?
Hewpie 3 months ago
@Hewpie
Conventional...? No, it's scientific above all. Are you serious? Filming astronauts on a stage in an aircraft? There are videos of astronauts walking 100 yards or more. Think of the best special effects movies that you have ever seen. Now think of the visual errors that even the casual uninformed audience can see in these films. Would it be possible in 1969 to do a movie that would have convinced astronomers? I don't think so.
Rob260259 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Hewpie
I'm sorry, but I have to laugh at your outrageous theory.
Try to fake 840 pounds of rocks and 6 foot intact core tubes and have them examined by geologists and petrochemists around the world. Try to fake tracking real time telemetry with biomedical data. Try to fake sixty scientific experiments on the surface of the Moon and fake the data received from them. Try to fake satellites launched from the SIM bays into lunar orbit.
Rob260259 3 months ago
@Hewpie
Here's a nice short video for you, to really demolish and hurricane your theory:
watch?v=Jw81Yg4YhBs
.
That is a HUGE studio...
Rob260259 3 months ago
@Rob260259 @Rob260259 I think you'll find the science populariser and adherent to post-Humean critical rationalism, Carl Sagan, and the bemomocled Astronomer Royale Sir Patrick Moore fell hook, line and sinker for Stanley Kubrick's live studio rendition of the Apollo 11 landings:
watch?v=D3fUG6spgLs
The technology was definitely available to fake the moon landings, especially with a $60 billion budget.
Why did the film not melt in the camera? Melt, like the "no wires" counter conspiracy claim...
Hewpie 3 months ago
@Hewpie
You don't have a clue, have you..? Where did that $60 billion go? And have you ever heard of passive thermal control? The thermal environment on the Moon is not the same as in Earth orbit even though both places are in space at the same average distance from the sun. You have to consider radiation in two distinct spectral bands.
Google it all. Don't just say "impossible" or "fake" because you don't comprehend.
Rob260259 3 months ago
@Rob260259 I'm sorry but the $60 billion would have sufficed to photo-realistically animate whole moon landings in real time - if you have a whole football stadium full of physics trained animators and and special effects artists it could have all been rendered and broadcast in the time it takes for the signal to get from the moon to the earth. The evidence that the $60 billion went to the moon is very sketchy - excuse the pun!
How else would you explain the comical appearance of the astronauts?
Hewpie 3 months ago
@Hewpie
Tell me how to organize that all the people involved were kept silent. No death bed confessions, nobody spilling the beans, nothing.
Ever heard of Grumman, North American Aviation and Lockheed?
You're not sorry, you're kidding me. Otherwise; provide one (1) ounce of evidence that the Moon landings were faked.
"Comical appearance of the astronauts?"
- Huh?
Rob260259 3 months ago
@Hewpie
"comical"
- You mean the press conference? These pilots are not media whores, as are many of todays talentless wannabes. What you don't understand, these men were not raised to beat their chest, or do the funk dance for their achievements. They are modest, humble & focused on the task at hand. They don't show emotion or show their personal side. Otherwise NASA wouldn't' let them fly. Any little distraction could cost them their lives & impede the entire project.
Rob260259 3 months ago
@Hewpie
Try to fool people at the University of Cambridge, England, the University of Durham, England, the Geologic Survey in Ottawa, Canada, the Australian National University in Canberra. And try to fool the researchers in Manchester at the Universityl of Manchester, England, the University of Berne, Switzerland, the University of Cologne, Germany, the people at the Max Planke Institute Fur Chemie in Mainz, Germany. Credible institutions and people. But here is Hewpie. With his own 'Twoof'.
Rob260259 3 months ago
@Rob260259 Hello Rob!
How are you doing? I've had a lovely break from conspirasalysing about the moon, but now I'm back!
So let's go straight back into the arguement: Where was I?
It seems like the moon landing conspiracy must have been a joke that had gone too far, and no-one, even on their death beds, could bring themselves to admit it. I expect that there must have been a few wry and telling smirks, though.
Hewpie 2 months ago
@Hewpie
I'm fine, thank you.
There's not much to 'argue' Hewpie. I like to repeat the words of user Laurelindo;
" So to all you hoaxers - sit down. shut up, and study some physics."
Give it a try on w w w . clavius . org
Rob260259 2 months ago
@Hewpie
"Carl Sagan, and the bemomocled Astronomer Royale Sir Patrick Moore fell hook, line and sinker for Stanley Kubrick's live studio rendition of the Apollo 11 landings"
LOL :D
I hope you realize that documentary is a farce by the French director William Karel...
If you actually watch it till the end everyone involved is having a laugh at how much silliness they stuffed into one film! :D
I guess the one who fell hook, line and sinker is you, to William Karel, hehe.
GeneralSamov 2 months ago
Love videos like this. Moon hoax believers are a sad deluded bunch, when proof like this is laid before them they usually jump to another hoax claim, when that one is proven wrong they jump to another, it's goes around in circles, we're dealing with a modern day belief system here, a mythology, a quasi religion.
madbuzz90 4 months ago
@madbuzz90
Yep. Some of these hoax heads would say "fake" even when standing on the Moon, next to a descent stage of the LM.
Many of these conspiracy theorists do JFK, Freemasons, Chemtrails, Illuminati, 9/11 and Area51 as well....
Rob260259 4 months ago
@Rob260259 all the ones you listed are true..except mabye jfk and area 51 dunno what that is.
ukijhu97 3 months ago
@Rob260259
In a few years there will be telescope there can see these landing places, then it's payback time.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen
And you will close your YouTube account then, for sure.
Rob260259 3 months ago
@Rob260259
Don't know, but you will go into hiding.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen
Ghehe.. that is what hoax heads like Straydog, Un4 and Pt1 said to me, just a month before LRO started it's revelations.
You will say "fake" even when standing on the Moon, next to the descent stage.
Rob260259 3 months ago
@Rob260259
LRO shows you play dumb, they are about to build a scope, a hell of a large one, let's see what it says then payback time are here.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen
Payback..? You're a funny loser. Pictures of a telescope will exactly match and acknowledge the LRO photos. Just as the LRO photos exactly match the Japanese Kaguya pictures. And just like the Apollo 15 photos match the Kaguya.
Just like you are totally delluded.
Rob260259 3 months ago
@Rob260259
Ha...ha....we'll see about when the time comes.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen
And again; that is exactly what Stray, Pt1 and Un4 wrote to me just months before LRO. In the mean time: prvide one (1) ounce of evidence that the Moon landings were faked.
Rob260259 3 months ago
@Rob260259
You provide one ounce of evidence that the Moon landing is not faked, not only stupid claims, you only can back up with your power of the compact majority.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen
One ounce? How about 840 pounds of rocks and 6 foot intact core tubes brought back? Impossible to do with unmanned probes. Apollo was massive. Videos and pictures taken, tracking real time telemetry, 60 scientific experiments left on the surface of the Moon and the data received from them, satellites launched from the SIM bays into lunar orbit, reflectors left at the landing sites, etc. etc.
You hoax heads are soo gullible...
Rob260259 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen
One ounce...? The technical data has been available for reviews for decades, some of it in advance of the landings. Planned TV coverage. Several generations of engineers and scientists familiar with the geologic studies of celestial bodies have studied the data. And here comes some loser Kennjohnsen and says it's all fake. Yeah... Do you even have a clue what highly directional telemetry implies? Telemetry including biometric data from humans, real time?
Guess not.
Rob260259 3 months ago
notice how when you speed it up their walking also speeds up
possomcrast 4 months ago
I could have done without the really stupid music.
aegisgfx 4 months ago
wow your a nerd !
TheMadJalapeno 4 months ago
@TheMadJalapeno At least the "nerd" knows proper grammar.
sundaynightdrunk 4 months ago
like morons really think that appollo 11 - 17 were all launched into orbit to 'fake' it?
vengencefrom1979 5 months ago
I LOVE this video. Finally somebody using physics, otherwise known as a REAL argument or piece of evidence. what I will say is this: maybe the moon hoax people aren't mentally ill, but I have NEVER seen a video of theirs with physics in it, or have I ever heard of an actual physicist supporting them. Not one of my professors believes the moon landings were fake.
BER2ERKER 5 months ago
@BER2ERKER Very true.
It's also quite comical when the hoaxers call Apollo supporters "brainwashed" - priceless irony at its best.
Laurelindo 5 months ago
Please watch a video of ANY sport. Humans can move quickly, I can't see anything wrong with the movie while it is showed in what would have to bee the right speed if it was taken on earth
amathias92 5 months ago
This is a great video, but since all moon hoaxers are mentally ill, it won't make them understand any better. Moon hoaxers are sad people if you think about them. They wake up everyday thinking that every single thing that happens is a grand conspiracy. They wake up everyday thinking that some unseen hand is trying to kill them and/or put them in a FEMA camp. They don't believe that men could go to the moon, but they believe that this dastardly unseen group can do just about everything else.
Mainsail76 6 months ago
@Mainsail76 . so let me get this straight.. you're saying that all moon hoaxers are mentally ill... and that if they mentally ill they are sad people? what kind of human being are you? obviously one who doesn't care about other people and the way they feel. at least we question everything around us rather than believe eveything we see. i think that wouldbe a sign of high intelligence wouldnt you? Rather than put down and bash people who beleive in the moon landing , we just like to put out
MsRachdawg 6 months ago
our opinion with peace but you guys like to put us down claming you are right and we are wrong. haha there is no sides here buddy . its just science and figuring life out. Did you that issac newton was MENtally ILL? what about winston cchurchill. all famous geniuses WHO questioned life around them and thought outside of the box. so keep following the herd sheep . we\ll choose our own path thanks
MsRachdawg 6 months ago
@MsRachdawg Are you on drugs?
david52875 5 months ago
Has it occurred to any hoaxer that the crosshairs are ALWAYS behind white and black objects?
Bleeding effect, ya know.
Laurelindo 6 months ago
Comment removed
Planetar17 6 months ago
I don't think there are any hoax-nuts that could comprehend this video or it's notations;-))
Great video, great music!
Tweekerhead 6 months ago
No matter how much I believe in the moon landings, I always feel deeply touched when I see proofs like these.
Laurelindo 6 months ago
taking the space suit and the plss into consideration, an apollo eva astronaut would have weighed about 225 pounds. the wire should have been about a quarter of an inch thick to support that much weight.
even if such wires had been used, it would have needed at least the 80s technology to erase them from the videos. video manipulation technology was unheard of during the apollo era.
zambi007i 6 months ago
@zambi007i
How do you know what these space gear weight, have you ever seen it....and why should they wear it in a studio on Earth ?
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen A: you probably don't pay much attention to english, do you? please go thru my comments again.
i said what i say for the "hoaxers" because i'm not one of them. i'm a firm believer in the apollo missions. so here's for you once more: -
what i stated was the converse: if these videos were to be filmed on the earth, then it'd have required so massive equipments, cranes, lifters, chains, pulleys and what not, that it'd have been more than impossible for nasa to fake it. (contd at B:)
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
Do you pay much attention to your English, read your comment again, I have. This is dumb excuses, pure stupidity.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen B: if nasa wanted to fake it then the easiest way to go about it would have been simply to go to the moon, do the exploration and return. but then, if they could land on the moon, then why the hell would they "fake" it?
did you get me?
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
Why would NASA fake it six times..?
Rob260259 3 months ago
@zambi007i
I get you, you play dumb.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen you seem to be mentally disturbed. in time, you could get brain burns. please contact some psychiatrist asap!
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
You seem to be mentally disabled not much you can do about that.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen btw, did you get committed? i might be able to do something. of course, it's useless talking to you. call your parents so i could brief them about your state of despair. please do take your medications regularly.
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
The only reason you are around is that mentally disabled are in the majority.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen did you take your medication yet? would you like to be committed?
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
Have you ever been to a shrink, he can tell you your mentally capacity, I am committed to the truth, about the Moon scam.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen i see you've begun to suffer hallucinations. instead of getting cranky, you might as well throw up some solid evidence about your belief in the "moon scam". i promise i'll converse with you keeping your viewpoint. but, there's a saying - a fool is born every minute, and two to take his place! you might as well be one of the three!! keep on posting crap; there's someone somewhere that'll always get your thoughts!!!
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
Everything in the Moon landing proves it's an impossibility......the capsule....is one, the number one proof I think is the space radiation. And it's confirmed by that no one has been outside the belt since this so-called Moon flight. Yes, there is an ordinary born every second, and you are definitely one of them. And there is a lot of Governments believing suckers backing you up, that's why we got this Government.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen i was right! you should get committed before it's too late for you. keep on believing the hoax morons and conspiracy dumdeeheads. my belief comes from solid, scientific evidence. and that's probably much too massive to fit into your tiny skull. no education can be drummed into pea brains like yours.
enjoyed conversing with you though.
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
I am committed to expose you scammers in anyway it's possible, and certainly be there when it's proved it's a scam. You are a dumbhead owned by the state, you can't think, or don't want to thing, probably both.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen and you're the only one thinkin', eh? you must look more stupid than you sound. it's probably a splinter in your eye that's causing you so much irritation. wash with water. it'll give you some relief.
zambi007i 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zambi007i
No, but you are not, if you are you got an agenda.
kennjohnsen 2 months ago
@kennjohnsen by the way, do you have any solid physics background to back up your claims of the moon hoax? i bet you don't! you're like one of the so-called "truth criers" who think the next armageddon is on 12-12-12 or that "nibiru" is just about to devour earth. not much can be done for you hoaxers except wait till the moon xhd pics are released. you'll repent!
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
Do you got any ...solid...physics background to back up your claims of the Moon landing ? other than what you been told by the hoaxer NASA, I bet you don't. I got no idea about when Armageddon is coming, or if ever, all I know it's in the Bible. And I got no idea about Nibiru coming or not, all I know it's in the Sumerian script. But you seem to know, how the hell do you know ? What Moon xhd pics are released, the same stupid shit as all the others.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen it's quite allright. I can understand. other than what you get inspired by stupid.III grade dropouts like rene, sibrel, kaysing et al, you've absolutely got no gray matter.
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
What's your ....solid....physics background.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@zambi007i
By the way, Rene got a higher degree than you will ever get close to.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen did he get his ph.d in the same mental institution that i told you to get admitted to? are you a ph.d as well? from the same mental institution? ok, i get it now.
i've one thing to say to you: people like you are the ones that gave birth to the illuminati imagination. keep on believing your "truth". i'll wait for the day when the truth dawns on you! ciao!
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
He past the Mensa examine, something you will never do.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen and i believe you passed the ph.d that nasa scientists have? and you're the expert stating the facts that men can't go past the van allen belts? i don't think you're crazy. i can claim a billion dollars that YOU ARE CRAZY! and not only that you believe in something which have easily been refuted time and again. surface with one positive, clinching evidence against any apollo mission and i'll accept my defeat. otherwise you're like all the HBs - non-bailable soul!
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
You are stating the lie that man can go past the belt ( for now ) you are a jackass, And time will refute it, even to a jackass like you.
kennjohnsen 3 months ago
@kennjohnsen oh, oh, oh! somebody's got issues here!!
so you know how to use swears, huh? grown up, eh? ok, since you're so stubborn, let me get this easy-way into your peabrain. you prove to me nothing can go past the vab and i'll accept my error. if not, you're the one licking the sh*t outta jack, your ass! i know you can't prove the contrary, so i'll let you consult your "mensa experts" to get started. good luck jumpin' jack!
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
Reuters wrote a bit about it.........Reuters 2008 Space shuttle astronaut James van Hoften NASA......Yes I know a lot of dumb excuses.
kennjohnsen 2 months ago
@kennjohnsen the whole world of reputed scientists know and can provide enough evidence of apollo missions to stuff up your sorry *ss to satiate you, numbskull! but since you don't wanna medicate your eardrums, i'll continue enjoying our mutual-hurls of swears! :-)
zambi007i 3 months ago
@zambi007i
Scientists are like anyone else, bootlickers.
kennjohnsen 2 months ago
@kennjohnsen yeah, and you invented what the world uses today, right from cellular fones to shaving razors to cfls, battery cars, and hell what, even the metro! you seem to be enjoying getting drowned in your honey dreams. why don't you come out and provide one ounce of evidence about anything that can prove the moonwalks were faked? but you won't, since you can't! no hoaxer can! every such false claims have been refuted time and again, right from the fluttering flag to shadows to jumps &c.
zambi007i 2 months ago
@zambi007i
I see, James van Hoften makes false claims. He is not the only one making those claims. Man cannot travel in space beyond the belt, before a way is found to protect them against space radiation. Only a little thinking and deeper understanding makes that clear, which you obviously are not capable of.
kennjohnsen 2 months ago
@kennjohnsen no one has been beyond the vab since then because no one needs to. you see, returning to the moon once again just to prove we already went would only waste taxpayers' money. and you stupid morons would even then never believe and would call such a conciliatory mission as faked again like you have been doing after passing mensa.
you and i are here for the truth to surface. you believe what you do. i'll go with the facts. let's see who was right in his/her belief?
zambi007i 2 months ago
@zambi007i
The usual, just dumb excuses, you can't keep this lie alive for ever, someday it will be proved a lie.
kennjohnsen 2 months ago
@kennjohnsen well, i tried not to be rude, but you've to know you started it (dumb thing etc)...
fact is apollo landings happened & the whole scientific world knows it's a fact. i was only trying to tell you that crying hoax won't get anyone anywhere. just because a few optical effects on the apollo mission films show up as anomalies, doesn't exactly disprove they happened. i've analyzed almost all the pictures and videos in nasa archive. i don't have an inch of doubt!
i was rude, sorry.
zambi007i 2 months ago
@zambi007i
Well I got hundreds of inches of doubt, when I read James Van Hoften - John H Mauldin - Eleanor Blakely, I understand that the spase is a very...very hostile place. And that is completely logical to me, that it is a very radioactive place, that it shouldn't be is on the other hand completely illogical. And so goes for the Moon, a very radioactive place, As James Van Hoften says.....Man cannot travel in space before a way to protect him against radiation is found, he's never been the
kennjohnsen 2 months ago
Ok, but what about rest of camera crosses? Not all behind white objects? And what about wires(?) reflections 2m over astronauts ? Backpack antena was shorter
Aristosek 7 months ago
Wow! This is some great evidence here! One of the best I've seen on youtube so far!
bluesrock2008 7 months ago
the final proof is the mirrors left on the surface by Armstrong and aldrin which are still used to this day.
johnredpath 7 months ago
All he did was measure the height at the apex. The "slight downhill" wouldn't really matter because the height would be from the point that the bag was launched at and the apex.
mrbacon92 8 months ago
The bag throwing is total nonsense, because you can never say what hight it was. That would only work if you throw it straight in the air. You can't measure the distance, cause you don't know if it's "slight downhill". You put a straight line into the background of a video and tell us how far that is? impossible on an unlevel surface.
I guess you back-calculated and filled in the calculated hight, right? That way your numbers always "fit".
Landazar321 8 months ago
Conspiracy theorist are not all hardheaded idiots. I looked into this. Now I see some proof. Moving on. Asking questions is good. Whats with all the people insulting people just for asking questions and being critical. It is good to question. We are lied to alot and mislead alot.
EdwardSkye1 8 months ago
@EdwardSkye1 ....It might have been good to ask questions about the Moon landings 30 years ago but all questions as to the validity of the 6 landings have been thoroughly debunked since then. If you have some valid proof of a hoax perhaps you'd like to reveal it to with us since you would be the first person in history to possess this information. Care to share?
teddysalad65 8 months ago
@teddysalad65 Of course I don't have proof. I saw proof of them being real. Sorry if I was vague. And how and when did you learn this info. Don't judge those going through learning process. Learning for oneself is good. So I disagree with you there. How about JFK has all that been thoroughly debunked yet?
EdwardSkye1 7 months ago
The problem with conspiracy theorists is that there will never be sufficient proof for them to believe what they have already made up their mind about. For a normal person, pictures and video are pretty irrefutable evidence, but the conspiracy theorist can simply claim "fake" or "fabricated" for any evidence you show them. That is how they simply ignore evidence to maintain their preconceived notions.
SkeksisRule 8 months ago
@SkeksisRule Irrefutable evidence to me is something I can empirically test.
Boldenberg 6 months ago
@Boldenberg Can you empirically test the speed of light? Not personally, right? So how do you know that what is claimed to be the speed of light is the actual figure (within reasonable accuracy).
SkeksisRule 6 months ago
@Boldenberg Besides, I know the video shows some pretty heavy physics, but if you understood the math and physics being explained then there would be no denying it. I know engineers who are moon landing deniers and when I showed them this video it shut them up completely because they know they can't argue against physics. Willful ignorance is the only excuse.
SkeksisRule 6 months ago
@Boldenberg You can test lots of moon landing stuff yourself.
Try putting your foot in dry flour for i6nstance, that alone is proof that you can make deep footprints without water, which explains the moon footprints.
Also try holding a wire or something and let it swing - it swings a little faster than the wire in the video, right?
You can also throw plastic bags up in the air if you think it will be enjoyable - but you probably won't reach 4 meters. O_~
Laurelindo 5 months ago
@Laurelindo I meant something along the line of testing the mirrors put there using some instrument (myself). Or handling a telescope (or whatever is needed) to look at the stuff they left there.
I do not prove the earth is appr. circular by looking at a football.
Boldenberg 5 months ago
@Boldenberg or you could just do the math and figure out that the lunar descent module is too small on a too far Moon to be resolved by an average telescope (or even with Hubble). BUT you could build a satellite, equip it with a decent telescope and send it to the Moon to look down not from 384 000 km but 50(!) km, just as NASA did, and see the descent modules.
Or build your own observatory with the laser and the telescope.
You could do it - but nobody said it's either easy or cheap.
lacalaca85 5 months ago
Hoax believers actually disprove themselves in a way;
I mean, if NASA were so smart that they could fool every scientist and professor in the world for almost half a century then they would sure as hell be smart enough to plan the moon landing.
Laurelindo 8 months ago
Look at the wires.
watch?v=23_QdAz2tfY
MickeyMouseApollo 8 months ago
This was obviously filmed in the vomit comet. haha
yesiamawizardjonny 9 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny You are a total retard,and i think everyone agrees you are a super mega retard.
scoot24925 8 months ago
@scoot24925 Good counter-argument! You should be a lawyer haha. Why don't you come up with some real evidence or shut-up.
yesiamawizardjonny 8 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny you have the real evidence in front of you.
scoot24925 8 months ago
3:22 looks like they put a little sand in a bag, threw it into the air and then turned quickly. This doesn't prove anything.
yesiamawizardjonny 9 months ago
Giant fans
yesiamawizardjonny 9 months ago
@NASAvsPETE
The movements are impossibly fast, that's the whole point, they can't be done by a human-being.
PS: At 1:35 in your video, the person crouching looks absolutely nothing like Kubrick. goo[DOT]gl/zvsJ9
So you can go ahead and retract that claim.
Cougar333 9 months ago
who gives a toss lets move on
114162033 9 months ago
lol who gives a shit . lets move on shall we
114162033 9 months ago
Very nice :) Hope this helps to open the eyes of all those kids who have been manipulated into believing it was faked. Or at least a few of them...but maybe those intelligent enough to see the evidence here don't need to see it, 'cause they haven't been manipulated in the first place :) And the rest...try to think for a change, there are many proofs besides this one, and every conspiracy theory claim can be proven wrong or fake in a matter of minutes, literally
Scorstin 9 months ago
@Scorstin I can respect those who feel perplexed by certain moon landing footage, because those people simply aren't familiar with certain aspects of physics and want an explanation so they can undersand it (which is a very good thing, because this is how you learn and grow as a person) - it is when they refuse to listen and obstinately insist that they themselves are right that they start to become annoying.
Laurelindo 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No Moon landings, sorry kids.
Leave fairy-tale's where they belong, in children's imagination.
NASAsCO2LIES 9 months ago
They move too fast because they're on wires. This doesn't prove anything. What does prove the moon landings were faked was that if you look at the pictures of the lunar rovers on the "moon" you'll see there are no tire tracks. I would LOVE for you to explain that.
yesiamawizardjonny 10 months ago
Witch-craft...obviously
Nayshan216 10 months ago
very smart! the way u think. and btw if i was in ur class i would vote for u. i like smart leaders!
YumYumKaBoomy 10 months ago
God bless you, cockroachafro!!! At last I get a response that's compassionate, level-headed and observant. Dad is now 88 years old and fading fast. His legacy and the legacies of so many others who put their lives on the line must be preserved. Again, thank you!
BurnsDillon 10 months ago
Great video! But still, many people don't understand physics. It's witchcraft, like electricity =D
EddieTheBigMonster 10 months ago 22
@EddieTheBigMonster That's well put.
anEELinDM4 9 months ago 6
@EddieTheBigMonster
Avatar 3D better !
fuckyorutube 8 months ago
Thank you So MUCH for posting this video. My father was one of the team leaders during the first Moon landing, and I hate the implications he was part of a lie. Another piece of evidence is right in front of our eyes: Lunar dust is very fine, like talcum powder, but you'll notice it doesn't "plume" when kicked up by either an astronaut or the Moon Buggy. That can't be faked even with CGI today. NO AIR! Why can't we just be proud we went and stop this conspiracy foolishness?
BurnsDillon 10 months ago 2
@BurnsDillon
A great big thank you to your father! and there is a reason you never see heaxers address the dust. Besides not billowing the dust also follows a parabolic arc that we would expect to see on the moon consistant with lunar gravity.But i guess Nasa just built a 1/6g set in a total vacume at area 51 hey?
cockroachafro 10 months ago
WHEN THINGS ARE THROWN WITH FORCE ON THE MOON THEY SHOULD TRAVEL 6 TIMES FURTHER THEN THIS VIDEO SHOWS.
EGMAG 10 months ago
ALL TRICK PHOTOGRAPHY
EGMAG 10 months ago
again at 4:39 watch for the weeeeee at about 4:42 ... if Nasa gave us the whole thing on the frame it would be all over, yet any open mind can see enough to see the cloth yanked and the Nauts pulled off his feet .... game over, dont need physics, Nasa never counted on the net and their pathetic films of 40 years ago... tho they tried erasing tons of them haha
pt1gard 10 months ago
from 2:30 for about minute, can someone explain what is yanking his backpack cloth up all the time--thats what I thought, shills cant see that LMAO
pt1gard 10 months ago
@pt1gard yes i can. the conservation of momentum! :) his flap was lose, he moves, his lose flap moves. don't you think nasa will come and watch all this thousands of times with rocket scientist before they ever made it public? lol
Forman6 10 months ago
and thousand of moon hoaxers just jizzed their pants and ignore this evidence and go back to shouting we didn't land on the moon. don't they do that? lol
Forman6 10 months ago
@amontaiyagala Nice video! I believe that Americans were on Moon. My only question is how can NASA explain similar landscape features ( rocks , hills) filmed (as they say) in the different places of the Moon. All conspiracy myths are busted but I newer heard how NASA explains that :(
MrAndersohn 10 months ago
the bag expands while flying in an airless vaccumm? comeon, this is getting a bit stupid. there is claerly wind resistance when he first throws it upward. if theres air resistance i think he can take that fake wrinkly suit off.
MrToiletface 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is retarded.... they wouldn't automatically use the same slow motion speed for everything. they would shoot the action then adjust the film to make it the most believable
dismanthegeeb 11 months ago
Comment removed
dismanthegeeb 11 months ago
There is an incredible amount of documentation of Apollo including the thousands of people who took part in it. Anyone reviewing even a small amount of it should conclude that faking trips to the moon with so much internally consistent detail would be harder and less likely to succeed than actually going.
MagicAlDF 1 year ago
What a bunch of noonsense human landing was fake and we all know it, otherwise, where are pictures from japanese satelite of lunar equpment, sorry but we need some other source then USA, i stop beliving them after they said that iraq have bio wepons and whole world stormed them
Magarenko 1 year ago
@Magarenko
yea it would jsut be easier to go xD
RoPWU 11 months ago
Maybe they practing on Earth befor going go Moon. Why you are worry
TooAkmk 1 year ago
The payload and fuel required for a trip to The Moon is astounding, with a one-way ticket only, and not coming back, talk to any physics professor and they will tell you, we cannot build a rocket that big to go that distance and back. that was in 2008, i doubt anyone went to the moon and back back in the 1970's C'mon People do some research before you babble about impossible rocket feats
sumstuff46 1 year ago
@sumstuff46
Clearly you've done your homework.
So, how big of a rocket would we need, and how did you come to that conclusion?
Cougar333 1 year ago
@Cougar333
Looks to me like you've stymied dumbstuff46. Strange how that happens when you ask a MHB for some real science.
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
@sumstuff46 "C'mon People do some research before you babble about impossible rocket feats"
Have you ever seen a Saturn V launch?
Tweekerhead 1 year ago