@livinginlux Unfortunately, that is not what we got. The guy on the right was simply lying when he claimed the IAEA has only the right to track fissile materials. They have the right and responsibility to monitor the ENTIRETY of a country's nuclear program, including timers, fuses, high-explosive implosion systems, heavy water...
"They have the right and responsibility to monitor the ENTIRETY of a country's nuclear program, including timers, fuses, high-explosive implosion systems, heavy water..."
The Zionist State will not attack iran without the permission of Evil America, cause end of the day it's Evil America that created? the Zionist State !!!
Is there an IAEA report on the Israeli Nuclear Program? If there is an IAEA report on the Israeli nuclear program, what does it say? If there in no IAEA report on the Israeli nuclear program, one should be asking why not?
Great debate! That is a good sample of behind the scenes politics. And in plain words! I'm not even a native english speaker. TRNN is saddly one of the last sources of true free press around. Thanks for this Paul, and thank you for all you people do. May I suggest Dr. Helen Caldicott as a next interview? Maybe as consultant in a debate like this? I think that would be very interesting.
US/Israel currently have invaded and occupy other countries, they hold many many nukes, have underground facilities, double standards on an epic scale.
The Israeli firsters are happy to have this debate because it stops people talking about the illegal zionist expansion into Palestine, this whole thing is just one big distraction.
why the big focus on Iran ? when Israel actually HAS a HUGE stock pile of undeclared nuclear bombs! really, if we're discussing countries with nuclear issues Iran would be much further down the pecking order of concern.
we know why this is, the anglo-israeli-american establishment want regime change in Tehran because it is disobedient and independent, so must be punished, the nuclear issue is just a fake pre-text a'la WMD's in Iraq.
In IAEA Reports you will never find the full scale of intelligence knowledge. The kind of threatlevel is allways made out of accumulation of all factors relevant to trigger the escalation. People in overview of the facts will make the decision when and how to react against the powers with grave intentions
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad dared to doubt the official "Holocaust" story. Now Netinyahoo wants to punish Iran. The guy defending Israel in the video even said it. "rhetoric coming out of Tehran is troubling." The West is caught in a loop of insanity, to protect the big Holocaust myth they started after WW2. That justifies the partitioning of Palestine into a Israel state. The chickens come home to roost. Because you reap what you sow, and he that sows to the wind, reaps a whirlwind.
I mean, they don`t seem hard to make, i believe TRNN has the capacity to do a weekly debate show, discussing the issue of the week, it would be very nice and productive for public discussion
Is the corporate news media similarly sceptically debating this issue ?
We were not suspicious enough over the demonising of the Libya government, which Soliman Bouchuiguir, the key individual who initiated the United Nations action, has acknowledged was 100% speculative, and we should all be 100% suspicious of the attempts to demonise the Syrian government and of the attempts to demonise the Iran government.
After that China will be strangled with the same method. America will default on their debt and kill of the finacial base of the comunist regime. They planed it long ago.
It's like 2003. America will attack Iran after 2012. There will be an attack on london olympics. This will be used to acuse iran of terrorism. after that america will bomb iran and try to overthrow the regim.
America would be a better country if the mainstream media had as much journalistic integrity as TRN. It's a sad state of affairs when people have to turn to alternative sources for reputable news.
What about North Korea? They are protected by China, and China also supports Iran. North Korea has already conducted underground tests of nukes, yet we don't dare touch them. Iran seems more like an easy target for the war machine, but we might back down if Russia gets involved, we all know how we are the best buddies with them:) Don't let little USA start their own war without asking big USA, I'm tired of wars. That's all you ever hear on the news.
@vlogsmack The Israelis will only attack if they have conclusive evidence. The mission is way too sensitive to not strike with absolute precision on confirmed/not just suspected targets of weapons development. No strike from anyone including the US will take place. Retaliation is a whole other story. All of this rhetoric out of Israel is simply to get the Iranians paranoid. An attack will not happen unless confirmed and even then I extremely doubt a first strike - most of Mossad seems to agree.
I don't understand this. How come U.S, France,U.K, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, and so on can have as many nuclear bomb as they want;however, when Iran might go towards a technology that belongs to 70 years ago is a taboo thing. Is this discrimination or what?. This is racism. The end of the story
I can sympathize with your doubt, which I partly share. As things stands now, the NPT is a tool for war mongering, bullying and high hypocrisy, although (nominally) the NPT treaty started with noble goals. In its original form it has obliged its non-nuclear signatories to remain non-nuclear, for the commitment by the nuclear states to gradually disarm of said weapons. Sadly, the NPT has failed consistently on both counts, and as a result it became an ugly caricature of itself.
@saeidbah that is an incredibly ignorant thing to say. Iran isn't allowed to have nuclear weapons because it signed an agreement saying it would not pursue a nuclear weapon. that isn't racism. lucky for them, they ARENT pursuing a nuclear weapon. Why does the US want to attack Iran anyway? Because of Racism? NO. Because of geopolitical concerns to contain Iran as well as China and Russia as strategic threats to American dominance. Read a book.
@Craigipedia you sir seem not to have a clear perception of what racism is It is the domination of a RACE over other races thru means of policy or actions. This is why countries such as France, England, Canada, Netherlands or Switerland, Australia (not all nuclear) are never considered a threat to American dominance even though they are not all America. These countries are dominated by whites. So any nonwhite country that has or wants to get this technology is treated as a threat use ur brain
@supermike2164 yeah, and you don't know the difference between nationality and race... I'm not going to have a retarded conversation with you about this. But I will ask you to remember what people from the Indian subcontinent look like. Probably not "white", right? And nobody in America is officially considering either of them to be threats. China is also no white, and America does not officially consider them a threat.
@Craigipedia even you had to put the word "OFFICIALLY" in because you know officially isn't always practiced policy. China and India got there weapons before the U.S. and Isreal were able to do anythig about it. That is why partially why Pakistan has nuclear. But I see you are more concerned with insults and bullcrap so have fun being a slave
I actually hope Iran has nuclear weapons. I'd hate to see NATO invade yet another country without any fear of reprisals. They convinced Gaddafi to give up his WMDs and now he's dead and buried in an unmarked grave.
it's not THE Uranium enrichment that is going on, it's THE Plutonium enrichment that has been going on at a site near Akak {location on the map - 34 deg. 06'11.79 N / 49 deg. 34'09.09 E} that has been running for years now is the real news (not even being covered by the REAL news)...
@theguyisinthailand - plutonium is not even mentioned in the latest IAEA report on Iran. uranium yes, plutonium no. fuel-grade U-235 enriched to 20%. not weapons grade.
If I were in the Iranian government, I'd want nucleur weapons to protect myself from israel and the U.S.. Those two countries are the real terrorists, who should be condemned for their terroristic acts of war. Iran hasn't attacked anyone in 200 years. The fact is, an armed iran makes the middle east safer, because it would put the brakes on ongoing U.S. (Israel)-british-vatican imperialism in the region.
id like to see a transparent list of people who have contributed to the report and whether or not a contributor could have had a zionist conflict of interest, as I believe is likely the case
Good debate. It is informative to see both sides articulated clearly by reasonable people.
livinginlux 3 months ago
@livinginlux Unfortunately, that is not what we got. The guy on the right was simply lying when he claimed the IAEA has only the right to track fissile materials. They have the right and responsibility to monitor the ENTIRETY of a country's nuclear program, including timers, fuses, high-explosive implosion systems, heavy water...
SpectatorAlius 3 months ago
@SpectatorAlius
"They have the right and responsibility to monitor the ENTIRETY of a country's nuclear program, including timers, fuses, high-explosive implosion systems, heavy water..."
Please enlighten me
timcabc 3 weeks ago
Evil America = The Lunatic Zionist State !!!
The Zionist State will not attack iran without the permission of Evil America, cause end of the day it's Evil America that created? the Zionist State !!!
unreal672003 3 months ago
@unreal672003
Actually it was England.
Iammram 3 months ago
It's great that The Real News is starting to expand its segments.
newsradiohead 3 months ago
Is there an IAEA report on the Israeli Nuclear Program? If there is an IAEA report on the Israeli nuclear program, what does it say? If there in no IAEA report on the Israeli nuclear program, one should be asking why not?
ZedAlfa273 3 months ago
Great debate! That is a good sample of behind the scenes politics. And in plain words! I'm not even a native english speaker. TRNN is saddly one of the last sources of true free press around. Thanks for this Paul, and thank you for all you people do. May I suggest Dr. Helen Caldicott as a next interview? Maybe as consultant in a debate like this? I think that would be very interesting.
Bravo! - from Brazil
txztxz 3 months ago 2
Gaddafi says JFK was assassinated by Israel
/watch?v=hmNzEpbkftU
megamogx 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Israel with its 400+ nukes and power over America threw AIPAC are the real threat....
megamogx 3 months ago
Comment removed
megamogx 3 months ago
US/Israel currently have invaded and occupy other countries, they hold many many nukes, have underground facilities, double standards on an epic scale.
TheAsfaloth 3 months ago
too long
captcrais101 3 months ago
The Israeli firsters are happy to have this debate because it stops people talking about the illegal zionist expansion into Palestine, this whole thing is just one big distraction.
HuxleyWasRight 3 months ago
why the big focus on Iran ? when Israel actually HAS a HUGE stock pile of undeclared nuclear bombs! really, if we're discussing countries with nuclear issues Iran would be much further down the pecking order of concern.
we know why this is, the anglo-israeli-american establishment want regime change in Tehran because it is disobedient and independent, so must be punished, the nuclear issue is just a fake pre-text a'la WMD's in Iraq.
HuxleyWasRight 3 months ago
Full Report: haaretz . co . il/hasite/images/iaeairan.pdf
delerium2k 3 months ago
In IAEA Reports you will never find the full scale of intelligence knowledge. The kind of threatlevel is allways made out of accumulation of all factors relevant to trigger the escalation. People in overview of the facts will make the decision when and how to react against the powers with grave intentions
MrHenceWorstIII 3 months ago
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad dared to doubt the official "Holocaust" story. Now Netinyahoo wants to punish Iran. The guy defending Israel in the video even said it. "rhetoric coming out of Tehran is troubling." The West is caught in a loop of insanity, to protect the big Holocaust myth they started after WW2. That justifies the partitioning of Palestine into a Israel state. The chickens come home to roost. Because you reap what you sow, and he that sows to the wind, reaps a whirlwind.
Howie47 3 months ago
Thanks for this paul, i miss trnn debates,
I mean, they don`t seem hard to make, i believe TRNN has the capacity to do a weekly debate show, discussing the issue of the week, it would be very nice and productive for public discussion
StraussBR 3 months ago
Stick head in the sand and it all goes away…..=)-
Wh47n0w1517 3 months ago
beard guy: 10, without beard guy: 0
Kooshkff 3 months ago 2
Is the corporate news media similarly sceptically debating this issue ?
We were not suspicious enough over the demonising of the Libya government, which Soliman Bouchuiguir, the key individual who initiated the United Nations action, has acknowledged was 100% speculative, and we should all be 100% suspicious of the attempts to demonise the Syrian government and of the attempts to demonise the Iran government.
paulrprichard 3 months ago
Comment removed
paulrprichard 3 months ago
hoppla
pcuimac 3 months ago
monika lewinsko
pcuimac 3 months ago
usa is the main threat to peace. usa uses up the world reserves in energy and consume the wealth of the future now.
pcuimac 3 months ago
@pcuimac no israel and iran are. they could start a war and bring in the US, China, Russia, England and the EU
pat442389 3 months ago
After that China will be strangled with the same method. America will default on their debt and kill of the finacial base of the comunist regime. They planed it long ago.
pcuimac 3 months ago
It's like 2003. America will attack Iran after 2012. There will be an attack on london olympics. This will be used to acuse iran of terrorism. after that america will bomb iran and try to overthrow the regim.
pcuimac 3 months ago
Zionism is Humanity's Cancer
GalacticVacuum 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
America would be a better country if the mainstream media had as much journalistic integrity as TRN. It's a sad state of affairs when people have to turn to alternative sources for reputable news.
kenderoth8 3 months ago 2
Comment removed
kenderoth8 3 months ago
Surely the world gets by now that US and Israel zionists are the threat and not Iran.
landlogger 3 months ago 9
What about North Korea? They are protected by China, and China also supports Iran. North Korea has already conducted underground tests of nukes, yet we don't dare touch them. Iran seems more like an easy target for the war machine, but we might back down if Russia gets involved, we all know how we are the best buddies with them:) Don't let little USA start their own war without asking big USA, I'm tired of wars. That's all you ever hear on the news.
vlogsmack 3 months ago 9
@vlogsmack The Israelis will only attack if they have conclusive evidence. The mission is way too sensitive to not strike with absolute precision on confirmed/not just suspected targets of weapons development. No strike from anyone including the US will take place. Retaliation is a whole other story. All of this rhetoric out of Israel is simply to get the Iranians paranoid. An attack will not happen unless confirmed and even then I extremely doubt a first strike - most of Mossad seems to agree.
delerium2k 3 months ago
28:38 Ehud Barak basically declared Israeli nuke program on Charlie Rose the other day
delerium2k 3 months ago
Excellent work this interview
delerium2k 3 months ago
I don't understand this. How come U.S, France,U.K, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, and so on can have as many nuclear bomb as they want;however, when Iran might go towards a technology that belongs to 70 years ago is a taboo thing. Is this discrimination or what?. This is racism. The end of the story
saeidbah 3 months ago
@saeidbah
I can sympathize with your doubt, which I partly share. As things stands now, the NPT is a tool for war mongering, bullying and high hypocrisy, although (nominally) the NPT treaty started with noble goals. In its original form it has obliged its non-nuclear signatories to remain non-nuclear, for the commitment by the nuclear states to gradually disarm of said weapons. Sadly, the NPT has failed consistently on both counts, and as a result it became an ugly caricature of itself.
wotan20 3 months ago
@saeidbah that is an incredibly ignorant thing to say. Iran isn't allowed to have nuclear weapons because it signed an agreement saying it would not pursue a nuclear weapon. that isn't racism. lucky for them, they ARENT pursuing a nuclear weapon. Why does the US want to attack Iran anyway? Because of Racism? NO. Because of geopolitical concerns to contain Iran as well as China and Russia as strategic threats to American dominance. Read a book.
Craigipedia 3 months ago
@Craigipedia you sir seem not to have a clear perception of what racism is It is the domination of a RACE over other races thru means of policy or actions. This is why countries such as France, England, Canada, Netherlands or Switerland, Australia (not all nuclear) are never considered a threat to American dominance even though they are not all America. These countries are dominated by whites. So any nonwhite country that has or wants to get this technology is treated as a threat use ur brain
supermike2164 3 months ago
@supermike2164 yeah, and you don't know the difference between nationality and race... I'm not going to have a retarded conversation with you about this. But I will ask you to remember what people from the Indian subcontinent look like. Probably not "white", right? And nobody in America is officially considering either of them to be threats. China is also no white, and America does not officially consider them a threat.
you're an idiot. fuck off
Craigipedia 3 months ago
@Craigipedia even you had to put the word "OFFICIALLY" in because you know officially isn't always practiced policy. China and India got there weapons before the U.S. and Isreal were able to do anythig about it. That is why partially why Pakistan has nuclear. But I see you are more concerned with insults and bullcrap so have fun being a slave
supermike2164 3 months ago
I actually hope Iran has nuclear weapons. I'd hate to see NATO invade yet another country without any fear of reprisals. They convinced Gaddafi to give up his WMDs and now he's dead and buried in an unmarked grave.
Devilock79 3 months ago 3
@Devilock79 I agree. Iran was threating no one. same as Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya and so on.
landlogger 3 months ago 2
it's not THE Uranium enrichment that is going on, it's THE Plutonium enrichment that has been going on at a site near Akak {location on the map - 34 deg. 06'11.79 N / 49 deg. 34'09.09 E} that has been running for years now is the real news (not even being covered by the REAL news)...
theguyisinthailand 3 months ago
@theguyisinthailand - plutonium is not even mentioned in the latest IAEA report on Iran. uranium yes, plutonium no. fuel-grade U-235 enriched to 20%. not weapons grade.
iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2011/gov2011-54.pdf
techcafe 3 months ago
If I were in the Iranian government, I'd want nucleur weapons to protect myself from israel and the U.S.. Those two countries are the real terrorists, who should be condemned for their terroristic acts of war. Iran hasn't attacked anyone in 200 years. The fact is, an armed iran makes the middle east safer, because it would put the brakes on ongoing U.S. (Israel)-british-vatican imperialism in the region.
slewofdamascus 3 months ago
id like to see a transparent list of people who have contributed to the report and whether or not a contributor could have had a zionist conflict of interest, as I believe is likely the case
BWCmike 3 months ago