Magnet Motor Free-Energy -MWS 3D Testconstruction

[ShahinGenerator]

Another Video illustration that might be true or disputable as a Toy & Video Clip.

But not in a position to manufacture Generator System that needs no Fuel, Sun or Wind to Supply Electricity such as:

Shahin Electro Magnet Generator System

Whenever Electricity is needed with no Extra Costs to get Electricity.

For further information see:

Web: shahin-kadir.diytrade.com

Youtube:

- youtube.com/watch?v=JNW0ZyiVC2­0

- youtube.com/watch?v=7Z5nrA_8uT­s

- youtube.com/watch?v=llJkasfo_q­0

[Clint945]

Won't work.

They'll simply rotate to the nearest equilibrium point and stay there...

changing the orientation of the magnets doesn't make them 'push the wheel round' it just changes the equilibrium point.

Free energy is a non-starter. Like this motor.

[merlinspower]

@Clint945 If there is NO equalibrium, say that it is a design that creates chaos, like the Howard Johnson permanent magnet motor, then you would be thinking" outside the Box". If Gravity effects the continum , then spinning the motor like a gyro on magnetic bearings solves the problem. Ultrasonics and vibration is also a field not truly understood and implemented. . But to suggest its imposssible, questions your crediblity.

[cashoutnow]

nice video! the design can work with good out put something i would like to add shape and timing of field interaction !

[kthedral]

es hermoso!

[lucacazzulo]

what a fucking stupid video ...

[heartlessvietboy]

What is the force required to run an electric generator to the capacity needed to operate your electric vehicle? If a Magnets can run a Motor, how efficient will they be? Your wheels(On the Highway) can also create enough electric current to run your motor.

[steensn]

Great animation, good news and bad news though. Bad news, it won't work. Good news, you have a talent that is worth investing your time into that can generate revenue for you, animation.

[unamaxify]

where are the coils ? you can't get motion from static magnetic fields permanent magnets create. Permanent Magnets act like springs, if you don't introduce energy from the outside nothing is going to happen.

[SKULLSISTHATNIGGA]

I can build this and I see how it works the red things have to be _ and + to move nice thxs alot

[wyrrox]

Nope...

[elijahlucian]

in this design there is too much symmetry and too much chance for things to come at rest. go look at some other exact physical examples of this design. 

[ArtisanTony]

@RusconiDom we may never know the entire truth about this subject.

[ArtisanTony]

@RusconiDom no one said anything about folding space

[ArtisanTony]

@RusconiDom well you can't travel faster than the speed of light according to relativity. And, no matter what speed you are traveling, light will always pass you (at the speed of light) this is the essence of relativity. If you were riding a bike near or at the speed of light and turned on the light on the from of your bike that light would travel ahead of you at 186000 miles a second.

[Broax]

@ArtisanTony I'm pretty sure time would slow down so that light would travel at a constant speed. If the speed of light is a constant value you can't increase it you accelerate its source. So if speed is distance over time either the distance would shrink or time would slow down.

[transfusablepng]

Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything in their power to stop these information. If you want a Free energy machine do a search in youtube for the LT MAGNET MOTOR , Join the revolution!

[aikaslbab]

Not corect pole stators magnets.

[arqmarioesqueda]

Congratulations, we need to find new alternatives. the oil is out

[caprine888]

hülyeség

[big5824]

<3 perpetual motion nutjobs

[benjorgensen1]

maybe someone should try using ion jets in place of magnets, use the electricity generated to power the ion engines (asuming that the ion engines take less energy then the main shaft is generating). maybe oposing ion jets would be more linier. whereas a magnet alway has reverse flux at its edges that cancels out the repusion.

[Titanmk]

lol when i was at school i used to hate writing huge articles but on youtube i start typing and run of space in less than a minute, then i gotta start deleting stuff to fit it all in and end up making mistakes :(

[paddepijp]

lol another guy who could not resist to check it out.. haha

[ArtisanTony]

lol another dumbass who thinks he can break the laws of physics.

[Titanmk]

@ArtisanTony fine to be all high and mighty to make that statement except you dont have all the laws of physics, you only have some of them thats why we have no anti gravity technology, no fan dangle engine to travel at light speeds. Thats why we are still burning petroleum and polluting in our pathetic internal combustion engines. So please fullfill those expectations before making comments like that and try before you shrug it off.

[ArtisanTony]

@Titanmk LOL they are not my laws, they are the laws of nature. You show you ignorance every time you speak. "Travel at light speeds" You should know you cannot travel at the speed of light. To go the speed of light would require an objects mass to be infinite, and so would the amount of energy required to increase its speed. Please learn your physics then bring your arse to a debate :)

[Titanmk]

@ArtisanTony why would you discount being about to travel at light speeds? considering you scientists have considered folding time and space for wormholes at in effect travel faster than light, to jump into a wormhole on one side of the galaxy and pop out on the otherside of the universe would suggest you are traveling thousands of times faster than light. alas your right im no good at physics at all im just relying on commonsense. :(

[ArtisanTony]

@Titanmk What you speak of, if it would work, is not traveling the speed of light. The whole point of traveling through folded space would be so you would not have to travel at light speed, You would be taking a short cut through space and time not traveling the speed of light. That would be the point, to avoid having to travel light speed. And you are right, you are not good at physics :)

[Titanmk]

@ArtisanTony except your now saying its possible to travel through space and time and yet you say its not possible to travel at the speed of light. sounds Hypocritical and to be honest i dont think your good at physics either, you know a lot of fancy formulae and theory and its just a waste on your limited brain. What have you done with all that so called knowledge? what have you invented?

[ArtisanTony]

@Titanmk you guys need to read more. If you travel through folded space with is a straight line through curved space then you are taking a short cut and there is no need to travel at the speed of light. You do understand the difference right? All you have to do is study relativity and you will learn all that is need to know and why you cannot travel at the speed of light. No matter how fast you think you are going light will always travel past you at 386k miles per second. READ AND LEARN

[Titanmk]

@ArtisanTony lol how do you know that to be true? have you or anyone else done it yet? No!, Im no physicist and even i know folding time and space is just as impossible as travelling at the speed of light. lol who gives a fuck if light passes you as long as you travel at that speed was my argument. and no you havnt proved that either your just rattling off a whole lot of scientific ramblings.

[ArtisanTony]

@Titanmk Just when you think you have reached the speed of light, it will jet past you at 368k miles per second. The speed of light is relative dudes, NOW QUIT SMOKING POT AND PLAYING VIDEO GAMES AND GO LEARN SOMETHING :)

[ArtisanTony]

@ArtisanTony 386K miles per second not 368

[Titanmk]

@ArtisanTony lol ive used my ultimate common sense to say what you have just said is wrong. That doesnt make sense because light travels at a finite speed 300,000,000 metres per second, to say that it travels faster than that is wrong. even if i was moving and switched on my torch it would only project 300,000,000 metres past that instant i turned it on (relative to my own velocity) because i am moving. Now what i have said makes sense to me. if i am wrong only time will tell :(

[ArtisanTony]

@Titanmk 186K MILES per second. Not the damn metric system. Yes, 300K meters per second same thing. All that matters is that whatever speed it does travel you cannot travel faster than that because light is a constant in the universe.

[Titanmk]

@ArtisanTony ya but light is only a constant made up by a human, what proof do you have that shows there are no other constants? unknown rules not yet discovered! Einstein was the shizzle but only human with a human brain and by no means knows everything. Hmm if i was traveling at the speed of light and turned my torch on would suggest the light coming out would be traveling twice the speed of light, specially if i see it in tha distance. damit!!

[Titanmk]

@ArtisanTony maybe the speed of light is only relative to my own speed and location in time and space at that instant (whether milliseconds or microseconds) is that what it is?

[ArtisanTony]

@Titanmk Yes! That's why it is called relativity! It is relative the the observer.

[Titanmk]

@ArtisanTony bahahaha so what you were saying was right all along. But that sounds all to convienent, as if it were designed to fill that little hole over yonder! and sweep it under the map. cause now i have a delema, if i turned my torch on and im traveling at the speed of light im now saying that the light from my torch is traveling 2x speed of light unless i stopped time for 1 pico second turn on my torch it will travel 300,000 km and turn my torch off and restart time.

[ArtisanTony]

@Titanmk no because the speed of light is constant. That is why you cannot travel at the speed of light. The light from your torch would race ahead of you at the speed of light because at that instant you might as well be standing still. Besides, what were you measuring your speed against. The speed of the torch light will be the same, no difference, Now you are observing the torch and the light from it. The torch is the reference to measure the speed of light from.

[ArtisanTony]

@Titanmk all you have to remember is that no matter how fast you think you are going, light will always travel at 300K meters per second faster than you which is your reference. It is all about observation and relativity.

[Titanmk]

@ArtisanTony yes i know now why you say that, but, but butt!! To me thats the ultimate coppout to deem it impossible just because of that reason, especially unproven, maybe ideally proven with mathematics but i find many ideal models are never without flaws.

[ArtisanTony]

@Titanmk Universal constants are not something to be feared but embraced. The trick is not so much to travel fast but to take short cuts through space. Its like an auto race where cars are speeding very fast around the track but you can walk straight across the infield before they can speed around to the same point.

[ArtisanTony]

@Titanmk imagine a race track a mile long in an oval shape but it is only a few feet wide. The cars could be going hundreds of miles per hour but you could simply walk a straight line across to the other side. Its the same thing. This is how you would traverse time or other dimensions. Not by going fast but by taking short cuts.

[Titanmk]

@ArtisanTony yes, yes only time will tell i suppose.

[blipblipblur]

@ArtisanTony i had to read the whole debate about speed and time. from an my point of view id say that the "theory" of space-time is a load of bull and that there's nothing to bend. as far as the debate with light goes.. light is a form of energy taking the shape of a wave form and just like its counterpart (the sound wave) it is most possible to reach a speed that is equal to it. light dose not go 2x faster if your already travailing at the speed of light same as making a sound wont at mach 1

[ArtisanTony]

@blipblipblur The speed of light is constant. If you are traveling at any speed and you turn on your flashlight the light would speed ahead of you at 300,000 kilometers per second. This is not my opinion. This is scientific fact. Sorry, something in the univers has to be the fastest and it just happens to be a photon.

[blipblipblur]

@ArtisanTony no light is an energy. if light is a constant then everything in the entire universe is a constant and speed would be infanate. i dont know where you herd your scientific fact from but it sounds almost as buy-able as parallel universes.

[ArtisanTony]

@blipblipblur I can tell by your grammar and response you have no formal education in physics. Have you ever heard of Einsteins Special Relativity? If you had you would not be debating whether light was a constant or not. Light is a form of energy along with at least 9 other forms such as kinetic energy, thermal, chemical, electrical, electrochemical, sound, nuclear, etc... Light is considered electromagnetic energy.

[blipblipblur]

@ArtisanTony judging by your judging you failed to realised that gamma is an English lesson thing rather than a psychics thing. and Einstein was a theorist . nether the less light can only go as fast as it is limited to and will not travel at twice or more the speed of its own velocity. other wise there wouldn't be a "speed of light" but rather a light infinity. your the kind of person who thinks that time is a real thing and that time travel is actually possible.

[ArtisanTony]

@blipblipblur LOL, you know nothing about me. I do not believe in time travel in the since that movies portray it. But there have been scientific studies that show for example, astronauts come back to Earth with time pieces that have not progressed as much as clocks on Earth. This is explained in Special Relativity and is all about your own perspective and observation. All things are relative.

[ArtisanTony]

@blipblipblur by the way, if you believe that Einstein was "just a theorist" then you have much to learn about physics.

[blipblipblur]

@ArtisanTony naaaaa il leave the learning about physics to you. find me when there's proof of what you say. and as for the astronauts "time pieces" what's to say that there wasn't an external force acting on there electronic devices. in reality we know little about gravity so whose to say that leaving the earth gravity doesn't effect flowing electrons. and fyi the defensive start to your first comment suggests that i was close to the mark about the time thing.

[tknx2000]

All this is is a brush-less motor with a built in generator and is a very inefficient one at that. You would be better off charging a battery directly off of another for efficiencies sake. There is no free power from this device. you are actually loosing more power due to friction in the motor charging circuit. Essentially this is simply a mechanical voltage step up device. Grow up people!

[holywdtughguy]

this type of motor will NEVER WORK

[cedddd2001]

How can you come back on the perendev motor design that can not work. Rather go see the yahoo's group savage-z where you will find why it can not work and how to build a real perpetual motion motor.

[MWSOFT1]

Thanks for all the answeres!

Please note that this is just an Animation, I´m creating Visual Effects and CGI, the run of this Magnetic Motor isn´t proven or tested by me yet.

It seems to be that there is another Engine like that called the Perendev Engine.

[yoyodude7407]

it wont work this way. it seems like a good idea but the way magnetic fields work make this a bad design. if you wanted to stay with something similar, you could try repulsion with shielding. lookup videos of magnet motors theres a ton of them.

[evikzzz]

@MWSOFT1 Nice video!! 5+

☼Unfortunately ◄Perendev Engine► Doesn't work!!

[zeropointfuel]

Nice job!

[fickenderbrits]

major props to whoever came up with this idea. There are many doubters out there but who's to say that it could'nt work. sure the laws of physics are set in stone but look at the bumble bee. Given it's weight and size compared to it's wings, those same laws of physics say that it cant fly. same goes for the U.S. military helicopter UH-57 aka chinook. our way of thinking in todays world is based on laws but I've always heard that laws are meant to be broken.

[zzytrewq]

The stuff about the bumble bee is an urban myth. The original quote was that a bumble bee doesn't have enough wing area to glide. No laws of physics say it can't fly. The laws of physics say it can't glide, and it can't.

The reference to the Chinook is also a misquote. A properly sized rotating set of blades will lift an object if enough power is generated. Find one reference that says these helicopters do break the laws of physics.

You sound very naive and ill-informed.

[fickenderbrits]

read a lot of comments eh? got a lot of time on your hands, so you know a lot about physics, uhh think its more important to chat online than talk to real people? Why you gotta offensive and shit with your little line at the end of your comment? yeah I am a little ignorant about physics all I know is what people have taught me. Main reason is because most of the one I have encountered are too snide and full of themselves to want to talk to.

[zzytrewq]

I spend a little time on line, so what? You post several comments that are just so much BS when all it would take is a little checking on your part.

My comment at the end "You sound very naive and ill-informed." seems to be true and sums up even your own comments.

Stop being so sensitive and learn. Instead of posting what you have heard as fact post it as a query then "snide" bastards like me will provide the necessary information to guide you. Sorry if I offended you. I mean that.

[fickenderbrits]

well alright since you have decided to be the bigger man and decided to be a bit more civil about this then maybe we can put this behind us. I do know that magnets are the key to free energy and I have the skills, resources, and motivation to build such a device that would provide free energy all I lack is the rule book. practically everyone wants free energy I dont know anyone who enjoys flushing their money away. I may just post a video and show my design so more people can do this.

[zzytrewq]

Go ahead and build one. I can tell you know the trick to making it work is the "magnetic shield" that many folk suggest is the key. Trouble is the properties specified for the shield is it has to reduce the repulsion forces (to allow the magnets to move into the right position to repulse) and at the same time allow the repulsion forces to apply.

Have you heard the saying "Eat your cake and have it too"?

No such shield can exist.

Best of luck.

[fickenderbrits]

I dont care what kind of device it is, all I care about is whethor it works or not. My idea is basically a wheel with 750lb pull force rare earth magnets about six or eight in a circle attached to the wheel and tilted at a 10 degree angle. then another fixed off to the side tilted just right to make the wheel turn. that wheel would have a pulley attached which would turn an alternator. I plan to use fork lift batteries to store energy. I am still new to this so i dont know if it will work

[zzytrewq]

I'd suggest you make a small model first.

You will then see the flaw in your design.

[fickenderbrits]

i will just for good measure. I got the idea from the guy here on youtube that used a cream cheese lid with magnets around it and one to repulse them and that turned a small motor which lit a small led bulb.

[zzytrewq]

Good idea. Start small and get to understand the principles.

[ragingelephants2005]

@fickenderbrits whered you find a 750lb pull magnet at? ive only found 660lb

[dusteroo]

@ragingelephants2005

where can such magnets be bought ? Is there a good company to order a lot of magnets ? I'd like to have fun with some simple experiments on this, too.

thanks~

[fickenderbrits]

k&J magnetics

[dusteroo]

@fickenderbrits

where can such magnets be bought ? I'd like to have fun with some simple experiments on this, too.

thanks~

[fickenderbrits]

K&J magnetics, i just googled rare earth magnets or try neodmyium (spelling?)

[snivesz32]

The bumble bee myth existed because engineers didn't realize that it flapped its wings in a stall condition which generated beneficial turbulence on a subsequent flap.

[zzytrewq]

@snivesz32 - that is one version of the myth. I read that the aeronautical engineer said it can't glide as it has insufficient wing area (to mass) but was misquoted in an article (published around 1934?) as saying they couldn't fly (theoretically). Glide and fly being considered the same thing by the layman. The point is I think we both agree it is a myth - trouble is people still quote it as "proof" that engineers get it wrong.

Somehow that means free energy devices can work. LOL

[doss6621]

using gravity and Earth's magnetic fields, plus the magnetic motor listed above, while on certain "ley" lines, should produce enough "free" energy to power anything.

[JellonaOO7]

well there are very many problems with making motors out of magnets and getting enough force... If you can get it to do 1 spin without assistance fast and strong enough then it should be able to go on forever => free energy but as laws of physics say you cannot create energy from nothing...

[Purrebark]

when you're saying nothing you probably speak of anti-matter. and this matter is still a form of matter which can convert into energy.

[fickenderbrits]

but we must be willing to think outside the limits. For centuries we thought that the earth was flat. Who's to say that the people who wrote these laws you speak of (which are far outdated) may have been wrong about a few things.

[fias777]

nice

[mutwa]

Two magnets in repulsion will not spin alone. The perendev motor has a disruption at the beginning and the repulsion as the magnets moving away from the stator. You need to nullify the repulsion coming in, and use the repulsion going out, or else it's just a magnetic brake. Remember the field extends in a spherical manner away from the center of the poles.

[eddiefreddie39]

Nice animation.I think it will work.You might need to spin it up first then it should stay running.

[MWSOFT1]

Thank you very much, i think you won´t need to spin it up first, the magnets are strong enough to start the motor.

[DangerousAernscht]

Magnets for itself are't a power source. Energy = Force x Way. So it won't work because there is exactly the same amount of force required to pull magnets apart as the magnets are pruducing with attract each other.

But nice animation, I like it!

[onthelang]

What about different size and strenght magnets? Is there any definitive proof that this type of idea cant happen

[fickenderbrits]

is this your design?

[MWSOFT1]

Maybe it won´t work, but it´s just an animation, so everything is possible...

[knowledgemonger]

Oh great a too dark animation of a machine that would never work if it was actually built. There isn't even some nice music to listen to.

[noimw]

Your right is has not worked yet, and never will.