It was definently a controlled demolition, WTC 7 Is the only steel framed building in history that is suposed to have collapsed due to fire alone the twin towers were also a controlled demolition. They were built to withstand planes flying into them.
This is not true. From this angle it looks like it fell straight down, but it didn't - part of it came down across the street onto Fitterman Hall, part of Borough of Manhattan Community College. But explain this to me: the government conspirators who did this decided that demolishing two110-story buildings wouldn't be enough to incite the public, so they threw this building in, too?!?
I do see the east portion of the building collapsing first, then 8-10 seconds later the whole building collapsing. I can't explain if that means it was a controlled demolition or a building brought down by fires weakening the structure. Almost all the WTC 7 controlled demolition videos on Youtube always omit the east portion collapse and only show the 6.5 second free fall of the whole building. I just want to know the reason why these videos never show the east portion collapse
WTC7 collapsed perfectly like a controlled demolition. From 2 smouldering fires high up on some floor maybe the 30th something CAN NOT explain how the building came down vertically in on itselff. As seen in so many clips the basement and bottom gave way and looks like the top just falls in and sinks onto its footprint Those who say it was caused by fire and debris or what ever are fools and conspiracy twoofers or what ever names they are throwing around these days to discredit logic!
Its the gov what do you expect? Where was NORAD? taking a smoke break watching the controlled demolition? If the government didn't have something to hide there would have been an investigation. I think its time the people abolished the CIA and audited the Pentagon
If you are so determined to understand why the building fell, then read the report. The collapse of WTC7 was an incredibly complex event that took 200 scientists and structural engineers over 3 years to study and eventually explain. You choose not to believe them because they can not turn a 3 year study into a one sentence answer that makes sense to you. Just because you do not understand something does not mean it did not happen.
ABC TV helped do 9/11. They filmed it and made propaganda films to lie to the public about who did 9/11. ABC used film to protect Larry Silverstein who admitted to doing 9/11 as a controlled demolition when he said he said "the best thing to do was to pull it." ABC blames Arabs in order to protect Larry and ABC helped Larry to make billions of dollars in an insurance scam. Therefore, ABC has committed insurance fraud by helping Larry get away with doing 9/11. ABC aided and abetted terrorists.
Dan Rather was just speculating on what could have happened. He was not an expert on demolition. Initial news reports are unreliable. ABC reported that a that a car bomb had detonated outside the state department a few minutes before the north tower fell. If there were explosives in that building, there would be a series of extremely loud bangs immediately before the collapse. They would have clearly been recorded on all cameras present. Building 7 had no sounds of explosions at all.
@theBartone9119 its actually very sad, they're literally mentally retarded and believe every fantasy bullshit conspiracy theory and eat it up. "oh it has to be the government". shut the fuck up you retards. most of them are like 13 or 14 anyways and know their life is just boring and stupid so they gotta make shit up
thank god he is no longer on TV.....he has no idea what he is talking about. lets face it he hates all republicans and thats it. america loves conspiracy theories and this is another one.
@LeseMajeste I know who orchestrated the controlled demolition of building 7 on 911. He is seen from the back on my nuffrespect featured vid. Motive insurance fraud. He with DHS Janet Napolitano are also engaged in fraud against my person and property. The Obama regime is currently like the Reichstag Germany with their stories about Osama deflecting from the truth. They R redistributing my wealth from from bank and court records of me dead. We have to indict the perps or they dissolve the US. HR
@thearmin The Twin Towers were built so that if anything were to happen, bomb in the basement, crashed into by a plane that they would collapse on themselves. The same was done with the Pentagon. You people and your conspiracy theories make me laugh.
@outrageouslycrazy1 the fact that this was never again shown on the evening news nor even so much as mentioned again is a conspiracy all by itself...why have the two towers' collapse been shown over and over but not building 7?
@nathenism I'm not gonna sit here and argue with an idiot that has nothing better to do than point fingers at people and claim conspiracy. Lets put this to scale, shall we? Imagine a small fishing ship sinking the same night Titanic did....why the hell would they cover a story about the fisherman ship when a large triple-screw ocean liner sunk and took well over half of its passengers with her?
@outrageouslycrazy1 if you think this event wasn't worthy of making the evening news then you are in denial...joe leiberman said the collapse of building 7 never happened and rumsfeld said he never even heard of building 7...so why are they lying?....who is paying you to spew lies on the internet?
@nathenism No one was killed when WTC 7 collapsed and it wasn't a landmark like the twin towers. Also, the firefighters said it was unstable and likely to collapse, which pretty much kills the conspiracy theory that there were (silent and flash-free) explosives planted in it.
@outrageouslycrazy1 Can you give us a reference for that? Is that common practice when designing buildings? Are most skyscrapers built so they will fall down easily if there is a wastebasket fire?
@bcwhite750 Man oh man, YOU are a kook for not being able to think critically!!!!!
Ever hear of the Manhattan Project? The first atomic bomb? That had tens of thousands of people involved in it and it was kept well secret until after the first bomb was ready.
Hitler once said, "The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it." Nothing could be more true. Hitler recognized that the way you control and manipulate a nation is to tell the biggest and most blatant lies, as he did.
@campaigner111 It's good to see you throw in your lot with people like Hitler. This is the kind of person who believes conspiracy theories like this one. You now have no credibility.
It was demolitions. You people gave too much power to our government. This is the outcome. Were all puppets and slaves to the system now. We live and die by the sword we see not own.
There is a videotaped account of 9/11 NYC that is from one videographer, from one vantage point that is in real-time, and captures all but the first strike, an over two hour account.. with footage minutes before the North Tower was even struck. It was released after 9 years and is available on dvd. It is taped from one of the most iconic vanage points. It is the most inclusive account known to exist, and is positioning for a feature release for all this year: 'Tuesday Morning in September'.
Can you say: CONTROLLED DEMOLITION ? 911 was an inside job, end the fed, and we win back our freedom..continue to be passive fools and the scoundrels will continue to unleash these types of horrendous events..you do the research and start using your brains..it should be elementary that when our supposed authority is working feverishly to opress and rob us of our rights that our country has been hijacked..we are in deep shit!!
It took years to plan. Years to sneek in the stuff for a controlled demolition. The pilots were trained long before Bush was even a canadate. When plan A failed to blow up the trade centers during CLINTON's years. PLAN B was then started durning the CLINTON years. This is why paper where stolen by a CLINTON aid from the 911 comission. Now we have wikilinks, and HIllary ,the only one wikilinks boss says that should resign, won't run for office again.
@mongration If anyone believes "what" was a conspiracy they are an idiot? I am not sure what you are talking about, actually I have no clue what you mean.
@mongration Do you even know what the word conspiracy means? The official story is that there was a conspiracy from Osama Bin Laden & the hijackers to attack the United States. The debate isn't whether a conspiracy took place or not. The debate is whether or not it was from the inside or not. If you believe the official story, you too are a conspiracy theorist. So in your last comment, you called yourself an idiot. Good job.
For all of the people here in denial and for those seeking more info just do some research on NANO THERMITE AND 911. Please explain that report with your mental gymnastic arguments.
@Birdsofprey56 Yeah isn't it amazing how some STUPID or just plain ignorant people still believe in the official story of 9/11? I bet you all those STUPID people still believe in Santa Claus and everything they are fed or told by the media.
That would have been too obvious. Demolition explosives are more subtle and they can construct an alternative theory to feed the people via the propaganda machine while they ship off all the evidence without proper crime scene investigations being carried out.
They don't care about killing and lying, they do care about being caught.
I don't see why it is so difficult to understand that they lie to you, they lied about healthcare, they lied about WMD, lying is their profession.
where exactly were youat onthat day i had a front row seat at 99 hudson street NYC? there was alot of buildingas that shook like jello that didnt fall so why is it so hard for you to understand that this one did?
9/11/ was the day when the new world order proved to it's self that it can and does control ameriKa and the rest of the world, tells us all what to believe and why, don't question what your lieing eye's are really telling you. shut up and believe what your told!!! YOUR EYE'S ARE FINE, OUR LEADERS ARE CRAZY!!! INSANE!! PUT IN FRONT OF A FIRING SQUAD
So, uh, do you think that Nist, Mit, Nypd, Nsa, Cia, Fbi and Popular Mechanics (to name a few) were in on the conspiracy? The fact is all of these organizations investigated 911 and came to conclusions about the collapse of the Twin Towers......none of them mention anything about a controlled demolition bringing down the towers. Please let me know when you find FACTUAL PROOF of your.....uh.....THEORY?
@tickyul Factual proof? How about the BBC reporting that #7 had collapsed...even though the building is standing behind the reporter as she talks. That's a bit odd don't you think? Or is blatant PROOF not enough for your McDonalds clouded fat ass brain?? You MUST be Amerikan!!
@ShockBrotherStudios Uh, I actually prefer Jack In the Box, have eaten McD's about 2 times in my life. I guess if you want to base your whole Hypothesis on a statement from a reporter, over all of the engineers and others who spent THOUSANDS of hours evaluating the wtc disaster.....be my guest. And don't forget to play with Rosie O'dumbbells balls for me.
@tickyul you missed the point..Guess Jacks tacos rot the brain... Perhaps you should look into what I said (which by the way your comment is senseless drivel in light of what I ACTUALLY pointed out-nothing to do with Dan Rather-he doesn't work for BBC) Instead of swallowing what the government gives you to swallow...Ohhh yeah, your the one with the ball fetish so all the swallowing makes sense. People like you help bring this country down.
@ShockBrotherStudios Please explain how I "help bring this country down"! I think you have to look back to the direction this country took after WW2......as babysitter of the world and welfare spender supreme, that is what I call a death blow for this country. I try my best to logically evaluate information and either accept or reject it.
@tickyul I agree our "police the world" is ill advised, stupid, and not but propaganda, I could go on. What I am saying is the "incidental, unplanned, collapse of Trade Center 7 was ANNOUNCED and talked about, ON public television (BBC), and as the reporter tells us the news we can SEE Trade Center 7 in the background...not collapsed. How logical is that??? How do you logically take that and say "Yeah, accident." That thinking brings a free country down.
@ShockBrotherStudios Well, remember correlation does not equal causation. Just because some reporter made a statement does not mean there was a conspiracy to bring down WTC7. A better argument would be made by referencing reliable factual information that shows a plot to bring down this building. Show me something impressive and I will consider it, not some reporters broadcast.
@tickyul :Your another mass media clone with acess to a thesarus for "big words" to seem like you have some neurons firing upstairs. Again, you miss the point. There is NO HOPE you will ever see anything except what the media feeds you. I just offered DRAMATIC proof, a live telecast announced a building had collapsed 10 min BEFORE it collapsed. HOW RETARDED ARE YOU!? The footage is RIGHT THERE! You better stick to deciding what next to order at Jacks, that is all I think you can handle.
@ShockBrotherStudios Nice job sir, I am starting to change my mind, insults really help you make your point. Just tell me what conclusions you draw from that video, I truly did not know what to think of it. And this video stands out so strongly that it nullifies all of the work engineers and others spent thousands of hours investigating 9-11?
@wkwickham: Look at the seismic information and you will find your proof. Also, explain the heavy white smoke from the bases of the buildings right before collapse? Ever heard of Thermite? Check out these two things you clearly forgot in your 2 minuets of research. When you have completed your research then talk to me. I don't have time for raw ignorance.
lets see - all the people who place the "thermite" there - not one whistle blower and of course, everyone working the FAA radar screens - every surviving police and firefighters - ummm nothing
then every possible scientist, nut job, and anti bush wacko - including the entire press corps - and yet NOTHING - not one tiny bit of evidence
@ShockBrotherStudios I mean seriously - lets pick one conspiracy to believe in we have: no planes at all = they were CGI a cruise missle squibs put into place by Bush's cousin - lol or yours - thermite, put there I guess by people who knew planes would hit the bldg but just wanted to make sure - lol who did it? larry s ? bush, cheny, blah blah the jews! it goes on and on
@wkwickham another blathering idiot who refuses to see the truths that are there. Amerikan? For sure. Where is your proof? I have read the entire 9/11 commission report, a few times. It does NOT add up (again pointing out you are in the LOWER 40% of the nation with your opinions). Alas, I doubt you own a copy, I doubt you could read it for more than 5 minuets before the "big words" got all swirly and confusing. Thankfully they have the graphic novel for you. Go read it and march on labor drone.
@wkwickham Actually 60% is well posted. Since you live there and know SO much about how New York feels I have to ask? Is YOUR brother sick from the clean-up effort? Did you even go to ground zero once?!? The difference between us, one is blind and has NO idea what happened. One has BEEN there, helped the effort and done thousands of hours of private research. Guess which one you are NOT?
@ShockBrotherStudios "well posted" isn't fact - i suspected you made it up or got it off some website
care to post an actual source?
you have cowardly avoided any real debate - so I'll ask a 3rd time, which crack pot theory are you trying to promote? - you avoided this question 3 times
you clearly don't believe in the standard answer, fine, then make some kind of "other" claim and back it up
@wkwickham Amerikans are ALWAYS wanting others to do things for them. You have the internet. Browse and read for a while. I cannot debate the blind nor ignorant. "About 12,200,000 results (0.44 seconds)"-read them yourself...I did. Noticed you shut up real quick about being a New Yorker, or about your hours of research, or anything about the 9/11 report. All things you know nothing about. And you want to debate me??? Now THAT is a laugh. I am done with you, you are dismissed.
@wkwickham "could car less" funny how when you get angry and pound the keyboard the typo ratio increases. I love that! Did I say I had a theory? Did I say I knew what happened? No. Are you a liar? Yes, we determined that. Now we can conclude that you are not worth talking to. You have done no research, you profess to belong to a city you do not, and you put words into other peoples mouths. "Amerika" you ignorant hick is a WELL KNOWN stab at "military state America" wake up!
@ShockBrotherStudios BAHHH - "we" determined that! there's more of one of you in there?
profess to belong to a city? hmm nope
research? exhaustive, but you won't debate so ?
see if you disagree with the well known, and published facts, then by definition - you must then have an alternate theory - no finally you're honest and admit you have nothing
good thing - because as soon as you posted it - it would be debunked
you really can't afford to have your wacky belief system challenged
"i looks like a planned demolition" "it sounded like a bomb went off" "i think they planted explosives" all is not what it seams to be, where is the proof?
@ksteiger : CORRECT! That's why when buildings collapse by accident they topple in all manner of random directions. Hence the term "controlled demolition" to avoid collateral damage. Your a idiot...blind...perfect Amerikan they should breed you...
@drowsy4 If the building would have blown out the theories would be a missile. There is a conspiracy theory for everything. OOOH how about the UFO oops that was a helicopter. How about the American government!! Why is it easier to blame our own countrymen than it is to put the blame where it belongs: On Islamic Radical Freaks!! Now the mosque at ground zero! What a "In your face" statement that is.
That's a controlled demolition all right! Not really amazing or incredible...just a "normal" ordinary building demolition. Now the two towers demolitions actually WERE quite unusual because they blew stuff outwards from the buildings and didn't just collapse neatly like this one did! They were obviously meant to be more "showy" and extravagant....and make a HUGE mess at the same time too.
I always thought Dan Rather was an insufferable prig. "Prig" is one of those British insults you can use in polite society. HOWEVER, in this case Dan Blather was right. WTC7 did look exactly like a controlled demolition. He obviously had not yet been told the official story. Admit it; if you saw the WTC7 video and did not know what it was, you would not think anything OTHER than controlled demolition.
Search THE OBAMA DECEPTION on youtube. Resist the new world order. Wake up and realize the illuminati has you in their control. Left wing and right wing don't matter, they are both the same. infowars . com
@pjt03 the penthouse sagging the roof in from fire is what initiated the collapse of building 7 (check out the 10 seconds before initial free fall at the top left of the building, you'll see the fire start to sag everything down, bombs don't do that) then the support gave. gravity pulled it at free fall speed for 2.3 seconds (NIST) then it remained constant (no free fall) for the rest of the collapse. Everyone knows this obviously, but the AE911 guys prey on the weak minded for donations lol
@pjt03 thats funny considering the amount of demolition experts who have on the record stated that this looks nothing like any controlled demolition they have ever seen before, now these are experts, and what are you. Show me one video of a controlled demolition that looks like the #7 collapse , I challenge you to . Why are you nuts so inept to the truth and why do you insist on denying fact?
An amazing symmetrical collaspe at freefall speed. There is no doubt that this can only be a controlled demolition. Otherwise what else can make this possible. Ive never seen an Steel oven collaspe due to fire!Have you? Or even symmetrically if you are even that more a defier of logic and physics. Al CIAda and Mossad.or dumbasses will tell you it was bin laden
@normanbrownsuits You've never seen it before? You must be an engineer. As far as what can make this possible? Read all 10,000 pages of the NIST report and you will have your answer. Instead you no doubt get your info from other conspiracy theorists who did not read the report.
Just because someone says "it looks like" does not make it true. That's why they say "looks like" not "It was". Cumulus clouds look like cotton balls. That does not make them cotton balls.
you guys should be ashamed of yourselves. it was the terrorists. its not debatable and if you think our country killed innocent people you dont deserve to live here
Just keep telling yourself that. That's the way to go. Whatever you do, don't ever consider that what happened might be different than what the media tells you. A building on fire just collapses, as if by magic.
i hope you're not an american. You are all delusional if you think it was anything other than the terrorists. You're not letting those people rest in peace when you say these terrible things. I'm convinced you were hiding when god handed brains out.
Not hiding, just questioning. Heck of a response though. I'm an American because I ASK QUESTIONS!! Are you a sheep that will buy anything told to you?? Was it terrorists? Was this some inside job? We, the people DO NOT KNOW! By the way Gulf of Tonkin incident... Just thought I'd throw that out there. Sorry, but history does show that we, the people have been lied to before. Therefore, I question things, that's all.
@that2007 NOT DEBATABLE? Don't deserve to live here? Wow, I thought Amerika was founded on the belief of freedom of choice. I choose NOT to believe what I have been told...as do 60% of Amerikans. You, my ignorant friend, are a minority, and the 60% who are asking questions think ignorant clones should be deported to the 3rd world countries where they will have a place digging ditches for leaders like Kim. There you can swallow lies and tell people (at gunpoint) that the truth is the truth.
There is NO WAY that this building would fall to the ground that quickly from fire or the diesel tank in the building, or any other rediculous theory. This building fell from a controlled demolition.
I don't know if you skeptics can grasp this concept or not, but the timed speed of this collapse didn't just fall at the speed of gravity...it fell of the speed of gravity within a vacuum. As in no air resistance.
From debrit and fire on a few floors...not a chance!
Well... Look like the Trekers....oh sorry... 9/11 "Truthers" are out in force today... Man....you all have way too much time on your hands... Is this the same group that doesnt belive in the Moon landing? The same group that just got all the Star Wars on Blu Ray? Do you all have business cards? T- Shirts? Do you all actually think that the last administration was that smart? Really? ok.... Plane Footaged Faked.... Yuppers.... Enjoy your Hot Pockets and Sunny-D while in your parents basement
ok, so you are either a little slow, or your wanting us to 'bite' at your insults. its quite funny how you say 'we' have too much time on our hads.. but yet, you too must have the same 'time on your hands' if you yourself notice all the posts. have an awesome day.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
obviously freedom of speech is a key component to democracy and is part of what makes america so beautiful. but to say that 9/11 was an inside job is just a sad abuse of freedom of speech and a disrespect to the nearly 3000 people who died that day. the fact of the matter is it happened and we should spend our time remembering and honoring those who died instead of wasting time conspiring. It is a sad, pathetic way to memoralize the events of that tragic day.
Wow! Aren't you the perfect idiot. Clearly there is substantial evidence to say otherwise. "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." - Albert Einstein. Continue to graze in the field you piece of Sheep! Baahh... LoL
hmmm seems like this is like one of those ink blot tests. You see death which suggests you were a teenaged bed wetter that masturbates too much. I see a girl with big titties
And why would the government have felt it necessary to destroy an insignificant building like Building 7, hours after it had supposedly already destroyed the world-famous Twin Towers? The 9/11 conspiracy retardates never ask that question because the collapse of #7 argues AGAINST any notion of conspiracy. Of course, NOW they'll say, "THAT'S exactly why they took down #7, to make it all seem random!!!" Old English malt liquor and pot have ruined these people's minds. They have no life.
yes, it is absolutely amazing all of the engineers we have in this country. I have worked for the government for years and trust me, most of the administration - cannot tie their own damn shoelaces , let alone bring down a building.
crazycris29: everybody knows that; at least, most of us. They don't do a damn thing theirselves; they order people to do it. Professionals, well in advance; it takes months to prepare such a thing, not hours. Perhaps it wasn't a big conspiracy, for that matter. It could be most people they used are part of a big puzzle, without knowing it. 'Debunkers' say it would take lots of people to pull off such a thing. Is true. Perhaps they were drawn into a plan they didn't know of.
it was a controlled demolition.. also silverstein profited $500 million from building 7 because of his insurance claim he filed.. Bomb sniffing dogs were removed leading up to that day for no apparent reason... this is just a crumb of the pie. Facts not conspiracy.. Tell me who you think attacked us and why they did it??
dreamvisionnetwork: could be. One can only speculate. Some people say the buildings were 'dated', something new had to come. This implicates that these 3 buildings HAD to come down. Perhaps the demolition had been planned well in advance; during the process, some 'officials' had a better idea. Ordered by who knows. Let's destroy those buildings, in the meanwhile showing fake footage on t.v.. A false-flag attack. It's clear now that most plane footage was faked. Even the collapses.
4. The Office of Emergency Management (OEM) with blu-prints to all major building in NYC...
If WTC 7 survived, then WTC 7 would be key to the investigation on why the twin towers collapsed, and also WTC 7 was one of two location where they planned 9/11 the other location was the Pentagon (same area that was destroyed by "Flight 77"
why did they do it so late? ---- that I dont know......but they did it!
This is the essential piece of evidence. The audio of Dan Rather is the smoking gun, I actually remember seeing this clip on the day of the attacks, they cut to commercial as soon as he was done speaking about the TNT, like a producer in back went OH fuck.
WTC7 should prove to everyone that the attacks were a lie.
u idiots u dont need to see how the building went down ur blinded , inside job , on the top of that building are 2 other things maybe an airconditioning or climate control , and an elevator shaft top , those things on the top of wtc 7 crashed before the entire building went down
Perhaps Dan Rather mentioned controlled demolition because the official story was not yet out to all the talking heads. Or, perhaps demolition WAS the first official story, quickly revised. "We demolished it for safety" was replaced by the "fire and damage" story. There are videos of police, fire, and other workers mentioning demolition of WTC7 just before it collapsed. A confused Larry Silverstein said "pull it" Of course, a CD for safety would also have been a lie.
omg shutup. not a fucking coincedence at all. how would it collapse? from a little debris from the twin towers? if so, why didnt the other nearby buldings collapse from this?
@ReptilesRock2007 - I believe 27 other buildings were extensively damaged by falling debris, amongst which St. Nicholas' Church which was destroyed as a result.
YouTube: 911 Clues EVERYONE MISSED Google: the twin towers what really destroyed them? Google: 9/11 dancing israeli Google: urban moving systems Google: rebuilding america's defenses and go to page 79 Remember the USS Liberty? Attacked by Israeli Air and Sea forces on a clear blue sky day in 1967, covered up by Johnson, McNamara & the press/media. 34 dead Americans, 171 wounded. Despite the Israeli apologies, that was not a mistake. It taught them they could get away with murder.
Israel attacked us on 9-11 so we would fight all over the Middle East on their behalf. Dual citizen Israeli / Americans in our Government are more loyal to Israel than to AMERICA. GOOGLE : TED OLSEN CALL LIE GOOGLE : ODIGO WARNING GOOGLE : UNUSUAL EVACUATIONS GOOGLE : SILVERSTEIN PULL IT GOOGLE : DANCING MOSSAD GOOGLE : MEXICO MOSSAD GOOGLE : BIN LADEN DENIED 9-11 GOOGLE : ADAM PEARLMAN ADL GOOGLE : CHENEY JONESREPORT GOOGLE : NEUTREI KARTA
You people are fuking morons that watch too many movies...do you think buildings blow up in one huge explosion that blows everything to smitherines? of ourse not
Obama is coming to power and bringing Clinton people with him. What will these people do in the next four years to continue to cover up what they are responsible for. BUSH,CLINTON,BUSH,CLINTON.
experts have stated WTC was a professional demo job.. due to the construction of the building it could be brought down fairly quickly with thermate. if u look at what was in the building and why Silverstein wanted the WTC ($5-7B) complex destroyed u will understand. ENRON, WORLDCOM and other SEC files in their office in WTC 7. CIA, Gold depository ( gold never found except for some bars abandoned in the basement in a van )
If this building fell from "fire" then why does the controlled demolition industry even exist?
Apparently it's much easier to just set a steel framed building on fire and it will fall perfectly to the ground 5 hours later; even even if it's a reinforced command bunker like WTC7. This is an amazing new concept!
In fact, I should start a new company and get rich!
and after all u can put a crane on the top of the building:))amazing how the spanish build the houses..the americans have to learn from them:DDD..but the better part of it is that in Usa they dont need a control demolition companies..only a lighter and a bit of petrol:DD
Steel is steel its just as weak in America that it is in England or Egypt or anywhere. And steel isnt as strong as people give it credit for. The design of the building is completely irrelevant if the steel fails.
Take a close look at the manner in which WTC 7 collapses straight down. For the building to collapse in this fashion, all of the load bearing supports would have had to fail at exactly the same time.
The claim that the collapse was the result of a fire requires the fire be equally distributed throughout the entire floor of the building, providing equal heat for an equal amount of time, so that all the load bearings members would fail at the exact same moment.
Yep, the building housed far too many government operations for this to have been a "freakish" occurence. 7 wasn't hit by a plane, there's no logical reason for the manner in which it collapsed. This is a job for Mulder and Scully. Not to be flip, what happened that day and the days to follow directly affected me. I saw things I don't ever want to see again, and I heard things speculated upon that pulled the foundation out of ....well, let's just say many things I used to believe in.
This has been flagged as spam show
New 9/11 Documentary:
AE911Truth Experts Speak Out: 9/11 Explosive evidence
(43 Technical & Building Professionals are Calling for a New Investigation into the Events of 9/11)
watch?v=YW6mJOqRDI4
ae911truth org
patriotsquestion911 com
pavson77 1 day ago
It was definently a controlled demolition, WTC 7 Is the only steel framed building in history that is suposed to have collapsed due to fire alone the twin towers were also a controlled demolition. They were built to withstand planes flying into them.
mosthighoracle 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A new video, a Promo for my movie "Mansue.com ACT Alien Conspiracy Theory" may shed
some new light on what really happened on 911. Clever camel jockeys or Bad Company?
You decide.
I'm the most censored and hated publisher in Martian Klan controlled America.
Wayne E. Manzo, PhD
wmansue 1 month ago
It fell straight down. It was controlled.
tomperanteau 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AN EXPERIENCE THAT WILL TAKE YOU BACK
TO THAT DAY.. TO GIVE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO KNOW
WHAT IT WAS TO BE THERE.. THAT DAY…
AND A SAFE RETROSPECTION FOR THOSE WHO WERE.
THAT IS ONE WAY TO DESCRIBE WHAT IT IS.
'Tuesday Morning in September' Runtime 130 minutes.
Available now on DVD.
tusdaymorninginsept 3 months ago in playlist WTC Building 7
This is not true. From this angle it looks like it fell straight down, but it didn't - part of it came down across the street onto Fitterman Hall, part of Borough of Manhattan Community College. But explain this to me: the government conspirators who did this decided that demolishing two110-story buildings wouldn't be enough to incite the public, so they threw this building in, too?!?
Grvthang 4 months ago in playlist WTC Building 7
I do see the east portion of the building collapsing first, then 8-10 seconds later the whole building collapsing. I can't explain if that means it was a controlled demolition or a building brought down by fires weakening the structure. Almost all the WTC 7 controlled demolition videos on Youtube always omit the east portion collapse and only show the 6.5 second free fall of the whole building. I just want to know the reason why these videos never show the east portion collapse
Crede06 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WE HAVE THE VIDEO OF WTC7 BEING DEMOLISHED. THE VIDEO SHOWS THE EXPLOSIONS AND IT HAS THE AUDIO. ...ARREST LARRY SILVERSTEIN, NOW!!!
SEARCH: "!MUST WATCH NOW! Visible Explosions !NEW VIDEO! SEPT 2011 WTC Building 7 Controlled Demolition"
Born2Flesh 4 months ago in playlist WTC Building 7
WTC7 collapsed perfectly like a controlled demolition. From 2 smouldering fires high up on some floor maybe the 30th something CAN NOT explain how the building came down vertically in on itselff. As seen in so many clips the basement and bottom gave way and looks like the top just falls in and sinks onto its footprint Those who say it was caused by fire and debris or what ever are fools and conspiracy twoofers or what ever names they are throwing around these days to discredit logic!
harryc25 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o /watch?v=5qFsjdymqSk /watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k /watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA /watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI /watch?v=WxqoChniKVU /watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4 /watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY /watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE /watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w /watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ /watch?v=wKuLUu7SQU4
megamogx 4 months ago in playlist WTC Building 7
Explosions and lateral ejections clearly visible.
watch?v=NxGJHTlpOc8
ewingsco 4 months ago in playlist WTC Building 7
Its the gov what do you expect? Where was NORAD? taking a smoke break watching the controlled demolition? If the government didn't have something to hide there would have been an investigation. I think its time the people abolished the CIA and audited the Pentagon
Azygous420 4 months ago
As if the bottom was pulled out from underneath it... absolutely no resistance on the way down; uniform collapse. Fuck you 9/11 comission.
RyleKule 5 months ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
TOP FIVE 911 TWOOFER LIES
1) Nanothermite (aka paint chips from PPG)
2) No flight 93 (despite 95% of plane debris recovered)
3) No flight 77 (even though over 130 witnesses saw a plane)
4) Marvin Bush WTC security (never happened)
5) Free fall speed (absolutely no building collapsed at freefall speed)
ctcole77 3 months ago in playlist WTC Building 7
Wait a minute, I thought the media was a part of this so called conspiracy??
undernorm 5 months ago
If you are so determined to understand why the building fell, then read the report. The collapse of WTC7 was an incredibly complex event that took 200 scientists and structural engineers over 3 years to study and eventually explain. You choose not to believe them because they can not turn a 3 year study into a one sentence answer that makes sense to you. Just because you do not understand something does not mean it did not happen.
rroman3212 5 months ago 3
ABC TV helped do 9/11. They filmed it and made propaganda films to lie to the public about who did 9/11. ABC used film to protect Larry Silverstein who admitted to doing 9/11 as a controlled demolition when he said he said "the best thing to do was to pull it." ABC blames Arabs in order to protect Larry and ABC helped Larry to make billions of dollars in an insurance scam. Therefore, ABC has committed insurance fraud by helping Larry get away with doing 9/11. ABC aided and abetted terrorists.
MostMagnificentOne 7 months ago 4
Dan Rather was just speculating on what could have happened. He was not an expert on demolition. Initial news reports are unreliable. ABC reported that a that a car bomb had detonated outside the state department a few minutes before the north tower fell. If there were explosives in that building, there would be a series of extremely loud bangs immediately before the collapse. They would have clearly been recorded on all cameras present. Building 7 had no sounds of explosions at all.
TimothyRaymond1 7 months ago
@TimothyRaymond1 Of course man, but we should let the twoofers live their fantasy, it's all the have :(
theBartone9119 7 months ago in playlist WTC Building 7
@theBartone9119 its actually very sad, they're literally mentally retarded and believe every fantasy bullshit conspiracy theory and eat it up. "oh it has to be the government". shut the fuck up you retards. most of them are like 13 or 14 anyways and know their life is just boring and stupid so they gotta make shit up
cartrifride 5 months ago
thank god he is no longer on TV.....he has no idea what he is talking about. lets face it he hates all republicans and thats it. america loves conspiracy theories and this is another one.
brpoole336 8 months ago
During the 20+ years I worked as a career firefighter, I saw various types of buildings collapse due to the fire getting out of control.
They fall down in a random, haphazard, piecemeal manner, not all at once into their own foundation.
LeseMajeste 8 months ago 2
@LeseMajeste I know who orchestrated the controlled demolition of building 7 on 911. He is seen from the back on my nuffrespect featured vid. Motive insurance fraud. He with DHS Janet Napolitano are also engaged in fraud against my person and property. The Obama regime is currently like the Reichstag Germany with their stories about Osama deflecting from the truth. They R redistributing my wealth from from bank and court records of me dead. We have to indict the perps or they dissolve the US. HR
HoneySiegalSurvivor 8 months ago
I bet the last thing on the flight recorder was, "Allah Akbar!"
KingdomAwaits 9 months ago
Comment removed
thearmin 10 months ago 2
@thearmin The Twin Towers were built so that if anything were to happen, bomb in the basement, crashed into by a plane that they would collapse on themselves. The same was done with the Pentagon. You people and your conspiracy theories make me laugh.
outrageouslycrazy1 9 months ago
@outrageouslycrazy1 the fact that this was never again shown on the evening news nor even so much as mentioned again is a conspiracy all by itself...why have the two towers' collapse been shown over and over but not building 7?
nathenism 9 months ago
@nathenism I'm not gonna sit here and argue with an idiot that has nothing better to do than point fingers at people and claim conspiracy. Lets put this to scale, shall we? Imagine a small fishing ship sinking the same night Titanic did....why the hell would they cover a story about the fisherman ship when a large triple-screw ocean liner sunk and took well over half of its passengers with her?
outrageouslycrazy1 9 months ago
@outrageouslycrazy1 if you think this event wasn't worthy of making the evening news then you are in denial...joe leiberman said the collapse of building 7 never happened and rumsfeld said he never even heard of building 7...so why are they lying?....who is paying you to spew lies on the internet?
nathenism 9 months ago 3
@nathenism No one was killed when WTC 7 collapsed and it wasn't a landmark like the twin towers. Also, the firefighters said it was unstable and likely to collapse, which pretty much kills the conspiracy theory that there were (silent and flash-free) explosives planted in it.
bagintree 9 months ago
@outrageouslycrazy1 Can you give us a reference for that? Is that common practice when designing buildings? Are most skyscrapers built so they will fall down easily if there is a wastebasket fire?
Skeptic121 9 months ago 2
@bcwhite750 Man oh man, YOU are a kook for not being able to think critically!!!!!
Ever hear of the Manhattan Project? The first atomic bomb? That had tens of thousands of people involved in it and it was kept well secret until after the first bomb was ready.
Hitler once said, "The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it." Nothing could be more true. Hitler recognized that the way you control and manipulate a nation is to tell the biggest and most blatant lies, as he did.
campaigner111 10 months ago
@campaigner111 It's good to see you throw in your lot with people like Hitler. This is the kind of person who believes conspiracy theories like this one. You now have no credibility.
playsbba018 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
see if you can follow the CARTOON logic.
what evidence can the government provide that the
DEMOLITION of World Trade Center Seven was uncontrolled?
A CARTOON! that is it! NIST did not study one single piece of steel
from World Trade Center Seven.
so, supporters of the Official Government Conspiracy Theory,
the reason you believe the DEMOLTION of World Trade Center Seven
was uncontrolled DEMOLITION is ...."I watched ......."
bIZAROsPRMN11 10 months ago
It was demolitions. You people gave too much power to our government. This is the outcome. Were all puppets and slaves to the system now. We live and die by the sword we see not own.
straightcleaner 1 year ago
There is a videotaped account of 9/11 NYC that is from one videographer, from one vantage point that is in real-time, and captures all but the first strike, an over two hour account.. with footage minutes before the North Tower was even struck. It was released after 9 years and is available on dvd. It is taped from one of the most iconic vanage points. It is the most inclusive account known to exist, and is positioning for a feature release for all this year: 'Tuesday Morning in September'.
Supersynapsis 1 year ago
Can you say: CONTROLLED DEMOLITION ? 911 was an inside job, end the fed, and we win back our freedom..continue to be passive fools and the scoundrels will continue to unleash these types of horrendous events..you do the research and start using your brains..it should be elementary that when our supposed authority is working feverishly to opress and rob us of our rights that our country has been hijacked..we are in deep shit!!
unoitaliano 1 year ago 3
It took years to plan. Years to sneek in the stuff for a controlled demolition. The pilots were trained long before Bush was even a canadate. When plan A failed to blow up the trade centers during CLINTON's years. PLAN B was then started durning the CLINTON years. This is why paper where stolen by a CLINTON aid from the 911 comission. Now we have wikilinks, and HIllary ,the only one wikilinks boss says that should resign, won't run for office again.
tock101 1 year ago
mongration that right ur an idiot, come to ur senses and stop beliveing the conspiracy theory the goverment tell u
wild0hawk 1 year ago
know that i think about it.... the buildings falling do look like demolitions where planted in'em
kennywest9 1 year ago
LOL, anyone that believes this was a conspiracy is an idiot.
mongration 1 year ago
@mongration If anyone believes "what" was a conspiracy they are an idiot? I am not sure what you are talking about, actually I have no clue what you mean.
thomasmoonman 1 year ago
@mongration Do you even know what the word conspiracy means? The official story is that there was a conspiracy from Osama Bin Laden & the hijackers to attack the United States. The debate isn't whether a conspiracy took place or not. The debate is whether or not it was from the inside or not. If you believe the official story, you too are a conspiracy theorist. So in your last comment, you called yourself an idiot. Good job.
OfAllOblivion 1 year ago 2
For all of the people here in denial and for those seeking more info just do some research on NANO THERMITE AND 911. Please explain that report with your mental gymnastic arguments.
rennymyducky 1 year ago
only 100,000 views. sad.
ROORWANT 1 year ago 9
Controlled demolition ? The stupidity of some people still amaze me.
Birdsofprey56 1 year ago
@Birdsofprey56 -your stupidity amazes me.
CTCADGUY 1 year ago
@CTCADGUY IF YOU BELEIVE THERE WAS A CONSPIRICY YOU HAVE SHIT FOR BRAINS.SO BE AMAZED SHIT STAIN.
Birdsofprey56 1 year ago
@Birdsofprey56 Yeah isn't it amazing how some STUPID or just plain ignorant people still believe in the official story of 9/11? I bet you all those STUPID people still believe in Santa Claus and everything they are fed or told by the media.
enrriqueiglesias00 1 year ago 4
@enrriqueiglesias00 Well said my friend.
Birdsofprey56 1 year ago
Why would "evil power elite" care enough to do a controlled demolition when they are apparently so evil that they blow up their own buildings?!?!?!
Wouldn't they just blow them up and not give a shit where they fell???!?!?!
nardpuncher 1 year ago
@nardpuncher
"Why wouldn't they just blow them up and not give a shit where they fell"
Because controlled demolitions generally bring the building straight down.
Your next question might be well why bother with setting charges anyways.
Because of the good chance the towers would not collapse and thus there would be no Iraq or Afghan war.
JSSTyger 1 year ago
@nardpuncher
That would have been too obvious. Demolition explosives are more subtle and they can construct an alternative theory to feed the people via the propaganda machine while they ship off all the evidence without proper crime scene investigations being carried out.
They don't care about killing and lying, they do care about being caught.
I don't see why it is so difficult to understand that they lie to you, they lied about healthcare, they lied about WMD, lying is their profession.
AntiNWOMusic 1 year ago 8
please...the building fell that way for a reason: physics...
Kathordine 1 year ago
Clearly this building was built to self-level when it collapses.
Left. Left. Left right left.
JSSTyger 1 year ago
@JSSTyger lol
danielc121162 1 year ago
Gee, I wonder why Dan thought it looked like a classic demolition? maybe 2+2=4, could be.
matrxmax 1 year ago 2
@aboveurhead:
where exactly were youat onthat day i had a front row seat at 99 hudson street NYC? there was alot of buildingas that shook like jello that didnt fall so why is it so hard for you to understand that this one did?
butterfingersinc 1 year ago
after burning for 8 hours WTC 7 collapses.
butterfingersinc 1 year ago
And then they destroyed Dan Rather's career, just like Lou Dobbs.
LiveFreeOrDieNow 1 year ago
Hey he does a have a Physic degree.. He wishes.. LOL
masterod1 1 year ago
9/11/ was the day when the new world order proved to it's self that it can and does control ameriKa and the rest of the world, tells us all what to believe and why, don't question what your lieing eye's are really telling you. shut up and believe what your told!!! YOUR EYE'S ARE FINE, OUR LEADERS ARE CRAZY!!! INSANE!! PUT IN FRONT OF A FIRING SQUAD
banzaimotorcross 1 year ago
So, uh, do you think that Nist, Mit, Nypd, Nsa, Cia, Fbi and Popular Mechanics (to name a few) were in on the conspiracy? The fact is all of these organizations investigated 911 and came to conclusions about the collapse of the Twin Towers......none of them mention anything about a controlled demolition bringing down the towers. Please let me know when you find FACTUAL PROOF of your.....uh.....THEORY?
tickyul 1 year ago
@tickyul Factual proof? How about the BBC reporting that #7 had collapsed...even though the building is standing behind the reporter as she talks. That's a bit odd don't you think? Or is blatant PROOF not enough for your McDonalds clouded fat ass brain?? You MUST be Amerikan!!
ShockBrotherStudios 1 year ago
@ShockBrotherStudios Uh, I actually prefer Jack In the Box, have eaten McD's about 2 times in my life. I guess if you want to base your whole Hypothesis on a statement from a reporter, over all of the engineers and others who spent THOUSANDS of hours evaluating the wtc disaster.....be my guest. And don't forget to play with Rosie O'dumbbells balls for me.
tickyul 1 year ago
@tickyul you missed the point..Guess Jacks tacos rot the brain... Perhaps you should look into what I said (which by the way your comment is senseless drivel in light of what I ACTUALLY pointed out-nothing to do with Dan Rather-he doesn't work for BBC) Instead of swallowing what the government gives you to swallow...Ohhh yeah, your the one with the ball fetish so all the swallowing makes sense. People like you help bring this country down.
ShockBrotherStudios 1 year ago
@ShockBrotherStudios Please explain how I "help bring this country down"! I think you have to look back to the direction this country took after WW2......as babysitter of the world and welfare spender supreme, that is what I call a death blow for this country. I try my best to logically evaluate information and either accept or reject it.
tickyul 1 year ago
@tickyul I agree our "police the world" is ill advised, stupid, and not but propaganda, I could go on. What I am saying is the "incidental, unplanned, collapse of Trade Center 7 was ANNOUNCED and talked about, ON public television (BBC), and as the reporter tells us the news we can SEE Trade Center 7 in the background...not collapsed. How logical is that??? How do you logically take that and say "Yeah, accident." That thinking brings a free country down.
ShockBrotherStudios 1 year ago
@ShockBrotherStudios Well, remember correlation does not equal causation. Just because some reporter made a statement does not mean there was a conspiracy to bring down WTC7. A better argument would be made by referencing reliable factual information that shows a plot to bring down this building. Show me something impressive and I will consider it, not some reporters broadcast.
tickyul 1 year ago
@tickyul :Your another mass media clone with acess to a thesarus for "big words" to seem like you have some neurons firing upstairs. Again, you miss the point. There is NO HOPE you will ever see anything except what the media feeds you. I just offered DRAMATIC proof, a live telecast announced a building had collapsed 10 min BEFORE it collapsed. HOW RETARDED ARE YOU!? The footage is RIGHT THERE! You better stick to deciding what next to order at Jacks, that is all I think you can handle.
ShockBrotherStudios 1 year ago
@ShockBrotherStudios Nice job sir, I am starting to change my mind, insults really help you make your point. Just tell me what conclusions you draw from that video, I truly did not know what to think of it. And this video stands out so strongly that it nullifies all of the work engineers and others spent thousands of hours investigating 9-11?
tickyul 1 year ago
@ShockBrotherStudios lol and yet with all the footage we have not even a single set of footage with ANY audio of squibs
not one
how could something be filmed from so many angles and not one video captures the sounds of squibs?
wkwickham 1 year ago
@wkwickham: Look at the seismic information and you will find your proof. Also, explain the heavy white smoke from the bases of the buildings right before collapse? Ever heard of Thermite? Check out these two things you clearly forgot in your 2 minuets of research. When you have completed your research then talk to me. I don't have time for raw ignorance.
ShockBrotherStudios 1 year ago
@ShockBrotherStudios lol BAHHHHH
oh my god - 2 minutes of research
lets see - all the people who place the "thermite" there - not one whistle blower and of course, everyone working the FAA radar screens - every surviving police and firefighters - ummm nothing
then every possible scientist, nut job, and anti bush wacko - including the entire press corps - and yet NOTHING - not one tiny bit of evidence
no proof + wacky loyalty = religion
good job
wkwickham 1 year ago
wkwickham 1 year ago
@wkwickham another blathering idiot who refuses to see the truths that are there. Amerikan? For sure. Where is your proof? I have read the entire 9/11 commission report, a few times. It does NOT add up (again pointing out you are in the LOWER 40% of the nation with your opinions). Alas, I doubt you own a copy, I doubt you could read it for more than 5 minuets before the "big words" got all swirly and confusing. Thankfully they have the graphic novel for you. Go read it and march on labor drone.
ShockBrotherStudios 1 year ago
@ShockBrotherStudios the burden of proof does not fall on the sane or the norm - YOU, being the one out of the loop, must prove your theory
and clearly, other than insults, you have failed
by the way, which loonie theory do you claim? every twoofer has a differnt one
CGI planes? thermite? squibs? Bush, Cheny, cruise misslies, false flag, Israel, lol in goes on and on
40% , lol yet another made up fact, because I live here and most find this laughable
wkwickham 1 year ago
@wkwickham Actually 60% is well posted. Since you live there and know SO much about how New York feels I have to ask? Is YOUR brother sick from the clean-up effort? Did you even go to ground zero once?!? The difference between us, one is blind and has NO idea what happened. One has BEEN there, helped the effort and done thousands of hours of private research. Guess which one you are NOT?
ShockBrotherStudios 1 year ago
@ShockBrotherStudios "well posted" isn't fact - i suspected you made it up or got it off some website
care to post an actual source?
you have cowardly avoided any real debate - so I'll ask a 3rd time, which crack pot theory are you trying to promote? - you avoided this question 3 times
you clearly don't believe in the standard answer, fine, then make some kind of "other" claim and back it up
i suspect you can't
wkwickham 1 year ago
@wkwickham Amerikans are ALWAYS wanting others to do things for them. You have the internet. Browse and read for a while. I cannot debate the blind nor ignorant. "About 12,200,000 results (0.44 seconds)"-read them yourself...I did. Noticed you shut up real quick about being a New Yorker, or about your hours of research, or anything about the 9/11 report. All things you know nothing about. And you want to debate me??? Now THAT is a laugh. I am done with you, you are dismissed.
ShockBrotherStudios 1 year ago
@ShockBrotherStudios - LORDY, WE'LL try another time - you keep avoiding the question like a coward
what exactly is your theory? you even got one?
could car less if you're a new yorker - although i doubt it, you can't even spell american properly
debate you? its near impossible - you post no opinion, no facts, no sources, etc
pretty hard to debate a factless wind bag
but we're waiting
so for the 4th time, what really happened?
wkwickham 1 year ago
@wkwickham "could car less" funny how when you get angry and pound the keyboard the typo ratio increases. I love that! Did I say I had a theory? Did I say I knew what happened? No. Are you a liar? Yes, we determined that. Now we can conclude that you are not worth talking to. You have done no research, you profess to belong to a city you do not, and you put words into other peoples mouths. "Amerika" you ignorant hick is a WELL KNOWN stab at "military state America" wake up!
ShockBrotherStudios 1 year ago
@ShockBrotherStudios ahhh that makes sense - you have no belief and can prove nothing
all you know is you don't believe in the official story - yet you aren't willing to come up with an alternate theory
nothing
how sad - but it's exactly what i expected from a twoofer nut
wkwickham 1 year ago
@ShockBrotherStudios BAHHH - "we" determined that! there's more of one of you in there?
profess to belong to a city? hmm nope
research? exhaustive, but you won't debate so ?
see if you disagree with the well known, and published facts, then by definition - you must then have an alternate theory - no finally you're honest and admit you have nothing
good thing - because as soon as you posted it - it would be debunked
you really can't afford to have your wacky belief system challenged
wkwickham 1 year ago
"i looks like a planned demolition" "it sounded like a bomb went off" "i think they planted explosives" all is not what it seams to be, where is the proof?
loosechangeexposed 1 year ago
Believe what you want. These bulding are DESIGNED to collapse on their own footprint in a failure. Jesus.
ksteiger 1 year ago
Says who? NIST??
Thetan1974 1 year ago
@ksteiger : CORRECT! That's why when buildings collapse by accident they topple in all manner of random directions. Hence the term "controlled demolition" to avoid collateral damage. Your a idiot...blind...perfect Amerikan they should breed you...
ShockBrotherStudios 1 year ago
Perfect demolition
drowsy4 1 year ago 2
@drowsy4 If the building would have blown out the theories would be a missile. There is a conspiracy theory for everything. OOOH how about the UFO oops that was a helicopter. How about the American government!! Why is it easier to blame our own countrymen than it is to put the blame where it belongs: On Islamic Radical Freaks!! Now the mosque at ground zero! What a "In your face" statement that is.
roobaby40 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
please visit
theconspiracyexposed.blogspot. (com)
barquedust 2 years ago
That's a controlled demolition all right! Not really amazing or incredible...just a "normal" ordinary building demolition. Now the two towers demolitions actually WERE quite unusual because they blew stuff outwards from the buildings and didn't just collapse neatly like this one did! They were obviously meant to be more "showy" and extravagant....and make a HUGE mess at the same time too.
MsAzure77 2 years ago 2
@MsAzure77 but willie heard the engines fall down the elevator shafts not explosives
loosechangeexposed 1 year ago
I always thought Dan Rather was an insufferable prig. "Prig" is one of those British insults you can use in polite society. HOWEVER, in this case Dan Blather was right. WTC7 did look exactly like a controlled demolition. He obviously had not yet been told the official story. Admit it; if you saw the WTC7 video and did not know what it was, you would not think anything OTHER than controlled demolition.
Skeptic121 2 years ago
I'm posting this on December 31, 2009.
9/11 occurred in this decade. There's a big New Year's celebration tonight at Times Square. I would hope that folks stop at Ground Zero on the way.
ultraback29 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Search THE OBAMA DECEPTION on youtube. Resist the new world order. Wake up and realize the illuminati has you in their control. Left wing and right wing don't matter, they are both the same. infowars . com
ohkeepa2012 2 years ago
Yet another reason Dan Rather is no longer on the air.
He's an idiot
ToddonCapeCod 2 years ago
I just don't get it:
Nobody here knows the truth.
It's all speculation.
So why do you all argue over that as if you were the only one and wiser than anybody else?
TheCyclomethicone 2 years ago
A 9th grader can tell it was destroyed intentionally.
pjt03 2 years ago 18
a 9th grader don't have any education in engineering whatsoever, so: No!
OnkelMickwald 2 years ago
Yea you sound educated.
DingoMobis55 2 years ago
@pjt03 the penthouse sagging the roof in from fire is what initiated the collapse of building 7 (check out the 10 seconds before initial free fall at the top left of the building, you'll see the fire start to sag everything down, bombs don't do that) then the support gave. gravity pulled it at free fall speed for 2.3 seconds (NIST) then it remained constant (no free fall) for the rest of the collapse. Everyone knows this obviously, but the AE911 guys prey on the weak minded for donations lol
theBartone9119 7 months ago in playlist WTC Building 7
@pjt03 thats funny considering the amount of demolition experts who have on the record stated that this looks nothing like any controlled demolition they have ever seen before, now these are experts, and what are you. Show me one video of a controlled demolition that looks like the #7 collapse , I challenge you to . Why are you nuts so inept to the truth and why do you insist on denying fact?
RMD343 5 months ago 2
I would rather hear a truther than a lier.
Synthetrix comment is disinfo as usual.
bulitboy 2 years ago
An amazing symmetrical collaspe at freefall speed. There is no doubt that this can only be a controlled demolition. Otherwise what else can make this possible. Ive never seen an Steel oven collaspe due to fire!Have you? Or even symmetrically if you are even that more a defier of logic and physics. Al CIAda and Mossad.or dumbasses will tell you it was bin laden
normanbrownsuits 2 years ago 9
@normanbrownsuits You've never seen it before? You must be an engineer. As far as what can make this possible? Read all 10,000 pages of the NIST report and you will have your answer. Instead you no doubt get your info from other conspiracy theorists who did not read the report.
rroman3212 8 months ago
@rroman3212 You state that we all should read the pages of the NIST report.
I ask you one simple question:
- What caused the downfall of WTC 7?
Answer it.
shevegen 5 months ago in playlist WTC Building 7
Just because someone says "it looks like" does not make it true. That's why they say "looks like" not "It was". Cumulus clouds look like cotton balls. That does not make them cotton balls.
This is typical truther BS
Synthetrix 2 years ago
you guys should be ashamed of yourselves. it was the terrorists. its not debatable and if you think our country killed innocent people you dont deserve to live here
that2007 2 years ago
Just keep telling yourself that. That's the way to go. Whatever you do, don't ever consider that what happened might be different than what the media tells you. A building on fire just collapses, as if by magic.
DemonicSaint76 2 years ago
i hope you're not an american. You are all delusional if you think it was anything other than the terrorists. You're not letting those people rest in peace when you say these terrible things. I'm convinced you were hiding when god handed brains out.
that2007 2 years ago
Not hiding, just questioning. Heck of a response though. I'm an American because I ASK QUESTIONS!! Are you a sheep that will buy anything told to you?? Was it terrorists? Was this some inside job? We, the people DO NOT KNOW! By the way Gulf of Tonkin incident... Just thought I'd throw that out there. Sorry, but history does show that we, the people have been lied to before. Therefore, I question things, that's all.
DemonicSaint76 2 years ago
Thank you, Jesse Ventura
ToddonCapeCod 2 years ago
@that2007 NOT DEBATABLE? Don't deserve to live here? Wow, I thought Amerika was founded on the belief of freedom of choice. I choose NOT to believe what I have been told...as do 60% of Amerikans. You, my ignorant friend, are a minority, and the 60% who are asking questions think ignorant clones should be deported to the 3rd world countries where they will have a place digging ditches for leaders like Kim. There you can swallow lies and tell people (at gunpoint) that the truth is the truth.
ShockBrotherStudios 1 year ago
Look at what those muslims did!!!
LT1HILLINGHOE 2 years ago
There is NO WAY that this building would fall to the ground that quickly from fire or the diesel tank in the building, or any other rediculous theory. This building fell from a controlled demolition.
I don't know if you skeptics can grasp this concept or not, but the timed speed of this collapse didn't just fall at the speed of gravity...it fell of the speed of gravity within a vacuum. As in no air resistance.
From debrit and fire on a few floors...not a chance!
ipsofacto297 2 years ago
there is no "group"..there is either humanity or the evil!
ThePhiloflow 2 years ago
Well... Look like the Trekers....oh sorry... 9/11 "Truthers" are out in force today... Man....you all have way too much time on your hands... Is this the same group that doesnt belive in the Moon landing? The same group that just got all the Star Wars on Blu Ray? Do you all have business cards? T- Shirts? Do you all actually think that the last administration was that smart? Really? ok.... Plane Footaged Faked.... Yuppers.... Enjoy your Hot Pockets and Sunny-D while in your parents basement
whm3 2 years ago
in between breaks from World of Warcraft.....
whm3 2 years ago
ok, so you are either a little slow, or your wanting us to 'bite' at your insults. its quite funny how you say 'we' have too much time on our hads.. but yet, you too must have the same 'time on your hands' if you yourself notice all the posts. have an awesome day.
lightman514 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
obviously freedom of speech is a key component to democracy and is part of what makes america so beautiful. but to say that 9/11 was an inside job is just a sad abuse of freedom of speech and a disrespect to the nearly 3000 people who died that day. the fact of the matter is it happened and we should spend our time remembering and honoring those who died instead of wasting time conspiring. It is a sad, pathetic way to memoralize the events of that tragic day.
victorv92 2 years ago
Wow! Aren't you the perfect idiot. Clearly there is substantial evidence to say otherwise. "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." - Albert Einstein. Continue to graze in the field you piece of Sheep! Baahh... LoL
RevTours 2 years ago 3
0:30, looks like a face
face looks like a skull of a skeleton
deathis known as a skeleton with a black robe only showin his skull
thats the face of death.
jake92x 2 years ago
hmmm seems like this is like one of those ink blot tests. You see death which suggests you were a teenaged bed wetter that masturbates too much. I see a girl with big titties
Ted7864 2 years ago
And why would the government have felt it necessary to destroy an insignificant building like Building 7, hours after it had supposedly already destroyed the world-famous Twin Towers? The 9/11 conspiracy retardates never ask that question because the collapse of #7 argues AGAINST any notion of conspiracy. Of course, NOW they'll say, "THAT'S exactly why they took down #7, to make it all seem random!!!" Old English malt liquor and pot have ruined these people's minds. They have no life.
CodySeattle 2 years ago
yes, it is absolutely amazing all of the engineers we have in this country. I have worked for the government for years and trust me, most of the administration - cannot tie their own damn shoelaces , let alone bring down a building.
crazycris29 2 years ago
crazycris29: everybody knows that; at least, most of us. They don't do a damn thing theirselves; they order people to do it. Professionals, well in advance; it takes months to prepare such a thing, not hours. Perhaps it wasn't a big conspiracy, for that matter. It could be most people they used are part of a big puzzle, without knowing it. 'Debunkers' say it would take lots of people to pull off such a thing. Is true. Perhaps they were drawn into a plan they didn't know of.
timingfunk 2 years ago
it was a controlled demolition.. also silverstein profited $500 million from building 7 because of his insurance claim he filed.. Bomb sniffing dogs were removed leading up to that day for no apparent reason... this is just a crumb of the pie. Facts not conspiracy.. Tell me who you think attacked us and why they did it??
TonganSoIja63 2 years ago
Support the NYCCAN petition drive
coilYTcoyle 2 years ago
One theory could be that in building 7 there was something important that needed to be destroyed?
dreamvisionnetwork 2 years ago 2
dreamvisionnetwork: could be. One can only speculate. Some people say the buildings were 'dated', something new had to come. This implicates that these 3 buildings HAD to come down. Perhaps the demolition had been planned well in advance; during the process, some 'officials' had a better idea. Ordered by who knows. Let's destroy those buildings, in the meanwhile showing fake footage on t.v.. A false-flag attack. It's clear now that most plane footage was faked. Even the collapses.
timingfunk 2 years ago
by any chance do you know what was in WTC 7?
1. CIA
2. Secret Service
3. The Mayor's bunker
4. The Office of Emergency Management (OEM) with blu-prints to all major building in NYC...
If WTC 7 survived, then WTC 7 would be key to the investigation on why the twin towers collapsed, and also WTC 7 was one of two location where they planned 9/11 the other location was the Pentagon (same area that was destroyed by "Flight 77"
why did they do it so late? ---- that I dont know......but they did it!
venturafor2012 2 years ago
This is the essential piece of evidence. The audio of Dan Rather is the smoking gun, I actually remember seeing this clip on the day of the attacks, they cut to commercial as soon as he was done speaking about the TNT, like a producer in back went OH fuck.
WTC7 should prove to everyone that the attacks were a lie.
dragoon84 2 years ago
Yes.
Support the NYCCAN petition for a real investigation.
coilYTcoyle 2 years ago
He obviously wasn't in on it,
but quickly changed his tune after
finding out his bosses were in on it
PhuqueU 2 years ago
"For the third time today..." I wish he would've finished that line of thought.
jejojassy76 2 years ago
Benedicts 11 yah bawbag
TehHunSkelper 2 years ago
So why can't all of the engineering schools model that collapse if a plane could really do it?
Search Youtube for: WTC MIToo
If a skyscraper cannot collapse like that shouldn't the schools that train people to design those buildings know it? Why so much silence?
psikeyhackr 2 years ago
u idiots u dont need to see how the building went down ur blinded , inside job , on the top of that building are 2 other things maybe an airconditioning or climate control , and an elevator shaft top , those things on the top of wtc 7 crashed before the entire building went down
shaney02007 2 years ago
Perhaps Dan Rather mentioned controlled demolition because the official story was not yet out to all the talking heads. Or, perhaps demolition WAS the first official story, quickly revised. "We demolished it for safety" was replaced by the "fire and damage" story. There are videos of police, fire, and other workers mentioning demolition of WTC7 just before it collapsed. A confused Larry Silverstein said "pull it" Of course, a CD for safety would also have been a lie.
Skeptic121 2 years ago
9-11 is an inside job period
americans are crazy lol
why didn't that happen to italy or any other country?!
ciao "fools" :) the whole world is laughing at americas!!!
stop voting for stupid people...
i really feel sorry for you guys :(
invisible00001 2 years ago 3
Yea, Obama is the worst ever!
kvjhedfbv 2 years ago
@invisible00001 your just jealous because you arent american like everyone else that isnt from here and guess what no one here cares what you think.
firstcowtails 1 year ago
omg shutup. not a fucking coincedence at all. how would it collapse? from a little debris from the twin towers? if so, why didnt the other nearby buldings collapse from this?
ReptilesRock2007 2 years ago
@ReptilesRock2007 - I believe 27 other buildings were extensively damaged by falling debris, amongst which St. Nicholas' Church which was destroyed as a result.
frostek 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
uncledevo 2 years ago
I picked a word... coincidence.
xXxWhittonFittunxXx 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JesSaves 3 years ago
Hey... that looks just like a controlled demo!
Hey... that IS a controlled demo!!
GovernmentGoneWild 3 years ago 12
lol
jjmurph22290 3 years ago
does that mean death to you aswell as you are a burger eating american ?
konasquareheed 3 years ago
What that say in english ?
konasquareheed 3 years ago
Can someone translate NIckoolajy?
For all I know it says....BaBaBooey.
candlesburn 3 years ago
I think it's the lyrics to "10 Second Freefall" by the Three Shoes Posse. :-)
wvoutlaw2002 3 years ago
You people are fuking morons that watch too many movies...do you think buildings blow up in one huge explosion that blows everything to smitherines? of ourse not
lasdhkfdslhdlshaf 3 years ago
Obama is coming to power and bringing Clinton people with him. What will these people do in the next four years to continue to cover up what they are responsible for. BUSH,CLINTON,BUSH,CLINTON.
Reaganbites 3 years ago
experts have stated WTC was a professional demo job.. due to the construction of the building it could be brought down fairly quickly with thermate. if u look at what was in the building and why Silverstein wanted the WTC ($5-7B) complex destroyed u will understand. ENRON, WORLDCOM and other SEC files in their office in WTC 7. CIA, Gold depository ( gold never found except for some bars abandoned in the basement in a van )
victor2cutube 3 years ago
Sabotage
peace :)
haansgruber 3 years ago
have you seen the proof that his story was wrong?
alcohalvsmarijuana 3 years ago
Watch this an then the pentagon: 3-4 story building was "hit" but only a short section collapsed there - not all of it.
BUT two 110 story buildings turned to dust..from "jet fuel" caused by the same type impact...it does not add up!
Siriusluv 3 years ago 3
Make that 3 buildings not 2.
In the mind of official story believers 1+1=3.
campmatt 3 years ago 2
If this building fell from "fire" then why does the controlled demolition industry even exist?
Apparently it's much easier to just set a steel framed building on fire and it will fall perfectly to the ground 5 hours later; even even if it's a reinforced command bunker like WTC7. This is an amazing new concept!
In fact, I should start a new company and get rich!
I think I'll call it...
Fire Demolitions Inc.
TKDJimi 3 years ago 6
Haha, But your new concept will only work in the US, spanish steel frame high rises can burn for over 24 hours and still stand up. :-)
nickthesafe 3 years ago
and after all u can put a crane on the top of the building:))amazing how the spanish build the houses..the americans have to learn from them:DDD..but the better part of it is that in Usa they dont need a control demolition companies..only a lighter and a bit of petrol:DD
originalorol 3 years ago
that is so true i thought buildings in america were stronger
frenchy4001 3 years ago
Steel is steel its just as weak in America that it is in England or Egypt or anywhere. And steel isnt as strong as people give it credit for. The design of the building is completely irrelevant if the steel fails.
newdad1107 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dan Rather is a joke. He was run out of the "news" business.
locobuick 3 years ago
Take a close look at the manner in which WTC 7 collapses straight down. For the building to collapse in this fashion, all of the load bearing supports would have had to fail at exactly the same time.
The claim that the collapse was the result of a fire requires the fire be equally distributed throughout the entire floor of the building, providing equal heat for an equal amount of time, so that all the load bearings members would fail at the exact same moment.
Do you find this plausible?
911REICHSTAG 3 years ago
Yep, the building housed far too many government operations for this to have been a "freakish" occurence. 7 wasn't hit by a plane, there's no logical reason for the manner in which it collapsed. This is a job for Mulder and Scully. Not to be flip, what happened that day and the days to follow directly affected me. I saw things I don't ever want to see again, and I heard things speculated upon that pulled the foundation out of ....well, let's just say many things I used to believe in.
SS421982 3 years ago
building 7 housed the papers about the Enron and Worldcom corporate scandals
GWBsucksMonkeyNuts 3 years ago