Added: 3 years ago
From: atheistliberty
Views: 6,208
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (824)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This shouldn't even be a debate anymore. Creationism can be easily disproven by somebody with no scientific education. Once Adam and Eve has the child, what now? Do the children they have make MORE children? Impossible, that would be inbreeding and thus: two human beings can only go so far with populating the Earth. On the other hand we have evolution which is backed up by centuries of scientific research.

    It really pisses me off that there are people who believe in creationism over logic.....

  • @Stonefallow Theres also a word for things outside the realm of science, Imaginary.

  • @Reunakk There really isn't a debate. Some people like to pretend there is though. :D.

  • @Stonefallow and what is with u religeous people and making the logical fallacy that "there's no better explanation" therefore god is real. There are other explanations in string theory, and personally I don't understand the emotional need thing. They have a word for being mentally reliant on something to properly function, crazy.

  • @Stonefallow He never said it was stupid to believe in god, just stupid to believe in creationism.

  • It's not stupid to believe in God, God is outside the realm of science as we know it because God is unobservable. The belief in God may not have a rational basis, but it fulfills an emotional need and it's not like there's a better explanation. Maybe it's a placebo effect or maybe there's really something to it. I just wish more Christians would realize that faith has nothing to do with science, but rather philosophy. (There are some who get it)

  • good on you fellow Atheist!

  • Nice video and thanks for admitted there is no evidence for creation other than religious BS>

  • Well, an intelligent deity may very well exist, but the chances it's the god of the bible, or quran are basically zero. You're an Atheist, which means anti-theist and nothing more. I share a Deist view on top of Atheism, but don't believe in things for any illogical reason..

  • too long setting up your argument

  • Creationism is factually wrong, I dunno why there's a debate anymore :S

  • @Dragonlanceish, so let me get this straight. If I don't worship Jebus im going to go to be punished? So you only worship him out of fear?

  • You sir are a inspiration to all atheist!! You just earned another subscriber.

  • First of all, God never said "all men are created equal"...so to have an intelligent discussion about God, you will need to know the Bible way more. Now in terms of homosexuality, that was a punishable sin, and still is. So is adultery. So is lying. Some sins were punished more severly than others, though, under Old Testament law. Christ came to take all the punishments we deserved, though. However, anyone who rejects Him as Savior is putting the punishment back on themselves.

  • Yes, it's been amended many times because every direction they go in is found to be BS. But, they can't kill the beast because that will expose them as frauds and kill the funding. And instead of saying there's a transitory fossil somewhere, tell me where. Which one? I'm completely open to being proved wrong, so tell me.

  • Look im an atheist, but stop making silly and useless comments on what your belief is. Just get along with one another!

  • Fair enough, I would admit, though highly improbable it is possible that there is a God who sent Jesus as our saviour etc. but seriously folks, do you think that evolution is just a 'vicious rumour'? Do you think 'the Devil' put these dinosaur fossils all over the place? Creationism is stupid, it was most likely made up by the Church to control people, and it worked. It brought us civilisation, but that was the past. I used to believe in Santa Claus, does that mean he's real?

  • Your opinion of me doesn't really matter. You conveniently skipped over some specific questions I asked you. Was Pontius Pilate a "made up" character? How about Jesus Christ? Go ahead, tell me that Jesus is a fictional character. There's all kinds of evidence for things that happened in the Bible. Would be happy to discuss if I had any incling you actually wanted to learn something. As far as evolution, the only thing that's honest about it is they're still calling it a theory.

  • @DCussen evolution is more than just a theory, and even if it is just a theory, then fine. but, that doesn't give you the right to turn around and say "it's all wrong, read the book of fiction, you'll find the truth in the land of make believe, lead by an invisible force who tells us that everything we think we know is wrong!" avoiding your question, read teh part where i said "the bible is a book of fiction." you'll find your answer there. as for avoiding the subject, double standards much?

  • @KillerKahn It is a theory - hence, the "Theory of Evolution"...and I have the right to say it's all wrong. You guys are the ones with double standards, the Bible has TONS of proof for it's history and claims. In fact, if you'd do any honest research (which you probably won't) you will be forced to agree. For instance, the resurrection of Christ is one of the most provable things in all of history - through SCIENCE. All of us creationists are still anxious to hear some proof of Evolution.

  • @DCussen "A scientific theory comprises a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (called scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts. A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena.[1]"

  • @DCussen gravity is "just a theory".

  • @DCussen You just said in basic terms "the bible is proof of the bible - there is evidence everywhere - I dont have to prove my claim just believe me. dead people come back to life all the time. the bible is true" and my personal favorite "I have never seen fossils".

  • @Xellith No, I didn't say that at all. There is ALL KINDS of proof for Biblical events and claims outside of the Bible. And, not only me, but NO ONE has seen any transitory fossils. Not fossils, transitory fossils. Set aside your emotional rage towards Christians, and obvious desire to pigeonhole them, and read what I actually wrote. I'm merely pointing out how ridiculous it is that you guys laugh at our faith, and then have faith in evolution which has no proof whatsoever LOL.

  • @DCussen /picard facepalm.

    Okay I know this is most likely pointless with you but I'm going to try anyways. EVERY creature that has EVER lived is a transitional fossil. If you was to get your Great Great Great Great Great grandparents bodies and line them up in a family tree - the genetic detail of each group of descendants changes with each generation. EVERY one of those bodies is a transitional form to you since each has minute changes.

  • @DCussen The same can be applied to every other species. Fossils are rare - very rare - if there have been 4 trillion lifeforms on the planet (no idea the actual amount) and we only find 500,000 fossils that's a very small percentage. It's impossible to go through one entire linage all the way back to the T-rex without skipping some steps - however by comparing fossils to one another you can see how one creature has changed into another creature and so forth.

  • @DCussen The fact you say that "NO ONE has seen any transitory fossils" shows how uneducated you really are. ALL fossils are transitory forms. EVERY SINGLE ONE. /sigh. But as I said OBVIOUSLY there are gaps in it because we will NEVER find every single lifeform in a line from start to finish. We don't guesswork to get results either case you are going to reply with a retarded "they are guessin!!!". They arn't.

  • @DCussen There is no proof for the bible. Prove to me that the world was made in 7 days 6000 years ago. You are the one making the claim. Prove it. Evolution is PROVEN as FACT. A theory explains those facts. Hence why its been labled with the HIGHLY REGARDED AND SCIENTIFIC name of "theory". Like the "theory" of gravity. The thing that astounds me the most is how you can call accepting evolution faith. Since anyone can perform these experiments and get the same results.

  • @DCussen A person in America and a person in Australia can never meet - perform the same experiment and get the same results. Religion doesn't work that way does it?  You get one group christian one group Hindu another group Norse another group Muslim. Get real buddy. Open your eyes and realize you look incredibly uneducated.

  • @Xellith ?! If you add two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen you'll get water - anywhere, anytime. That expirament will always work, and millions of others. Evolution is a farce. I didn't reject it the first time I heard about it. Heck, apes are kind of human like. I don't come to belief in Christ or rejection of evolution because I'm uneducated or someone brainwashed me, rather, I examined the facts of both. Btw, saying "ALL" fossils are transitory is the ultimate cop-out.

  • @DCussen "?! If you add two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen you'll get water - anywhere, anytime. That expirament will always work, and millions of others. " - What is this I don't even... Seriously what has this to do with ANYTHING lol. Evolution is proven FACT the EXACT same as what you just said. BTW saying "ALL" fossils are transitory is not the ultimate cop out - it just shows how uneducated you really are.

  • @DCussen Each change is a change and therefore because its a change its... wait for it.. EVOLUTION. What's so hard about this. Come on man.

  • @Xellith There have been no changes. Frogs did not somehow become hippos. Fish did not entually become giraffes. Yes, micro evolution has been demonstrated. Macro evolution has not been demonstrated - ever. You're determined for this to be true with no facts, and then keep call me uneducated. I took college level anthropology classes on evolution. The more I investigate it, the more fraudulent claims I have found. The whole theory is falling apart based on SCIENCE - forget religion.

  • @DCussen Correct! Frogs did not become Hippos. Whales became hippos is the currently accepted model. Whales are mammals and frogs are amphibians. Further back in time they had a relative but currently no. /sigh you are making stupid claims.  Give us some PROOF instead of "I said so"

  • @Xellith uugghh, you so missed my point. Whales become hippos is equally stupid. You've got to be kidding me. And, this model constantly changes every year among evolutionists. In fact, almost every evolutionary scientist is at odds with the others. I'm making stupid claims? I'm anxious to hear the latest on this tomorrow. God created the universe. He created you and I, we didn't randomly come from a rat. Intelligent design is running the whole thing, which gets evolutionists panicky.

  • @DCussen "this model constantly changes" that's what models do - physics is a prime example at this moment in history - if neutrinos travel faster than light and it is confirmed then the physics model that is used worldwide will have to be rewritten - so whats your point?. "almost every evolutionary scientist is at odds with others" no they arn't. "I'm making stupid claims?" yes. So far you have made plenty of claims in your responses but you havent provided ANYTHING to back it up.

  • @DCussen "god created the universe" this is a claim yet no evidence cept "i said he did so he did" logic. "He created you and I" reference?. Intelligent design? Evolutionists dont get panicy over intelligent design. Its just so easily debunked that nobody really cares about it - I'll humor you though. If the universe is intelligently designed - who designed the designer and where is proof for design.

  • @DCussen also whales becoming hippos is not stupid at all. We have transitional fossils that take humans back to a common ancestor with the other great apes. Its all there for you to see if you are just willing to open your eyes to reality.

  • @Xellith Saying that hippos cant possibly come from whales is like saying that children cant possibly grow from a sperm and an egg. 

  • @Xellith NO!! That is completely different, even you know that. Macro evolution is when one species turns randomly into some other species. What an idiotic comparison.

  • @DCussen Honestly I'm wondering when you are going to start talking about bananas being perfectly created for us.

  • @Xellith No, I'm sure bananas actually evolved from potatoes. It's funny, you'll believe every ridiculous theory (and they all take an amount of faith to believe) except for the belief in a God that created it all. And, Jesus (who obviously wasn't made up) rose from the dead. His resurrection has been proven millions of times over, yet you won't believe. So, stay in your blind world, clinging to Evoltion (junk science) as your religion. But, the living God is available to you if you seek.

  • @DCussen "No I'm sure bababas actually evolved from potatoes" The edible bananas people eat all over the world were created due to human interference - this is documented. Evolution is proven and documented. You so far have given no single shred of evidence to believe you. No idea's or possible mechanisms for your reasons. Just "believe me because I said so!"

  • Creationism doesn't scare science. It doesn't phase science. Science does not care about your beliefs. Changing your belief system to what you want to believe instead of what is actually happening is called being an idiot. Evolution is proven. I have seen the evidence and I agree with the conclusions. You sound like you looked at the cover to the Origin of Species and then stopped saying "NO GOD DID IT! NOW IM GONNA RANDOMLY PICK A RELIGION... CHRISTIANITY I CHOOSE YOU!" Facts > Fiction

  • @Xellith What a moronic rant. I hate to burst your little plastic bubble, but their are a LOT of christians who are scientists. Most of them discount evolution based on science. In fact, if you were really paying attention (which you're not) you would see in the last 30 years there are actually more holes in the theory than there were before as we study the complexity of cells. To say it's a proven fact is hilarious, even evolutionists aren't saying it's "proven" at all!

  • @DCussen I cant believe how uneducated you are on this subject matter. The fact that you are most likely a christian and unsurprisingly enough decided to pick and choose Christianity as your chosen faith more or less based on the region you are in should tell you something about the validity of your belief system. You cannot grasp the concepts involved. You shouldn't even talk about this subject matter without going back to school - perhaps not even at all.

  • @Xellith You crack me up. So arrogant and simultaneously misguided. Evolution is a sinking ship based on, for the last time, science, and you're happily standing on the deck. Again, NOT A SINGLE TRANSITORY FOSSIL has been found. To just conclude that all fossils must then be transitory is flat out stupid. In other words, you're determined that Charles Darwin is completely right no matter what. Darwin himself was upset a transitory fossil couldn't be found. I HAVE evaluted it.  No proof.

  • @DCussen "NOT A SINGLE TRANSITORY FOSSIL" This alone is enough to see why you are an uneducated idiot. I have already explained how fossil transition works. You are just too dim to understand the concepts involved. Species A evolves into Species B (and this isn't as black and white as your mind thinks) slowly. Therefore EVERY creature in species B's linage IS a transitional form. You are too dim to understand these BASIC concepts. I'm sorry but I'm done with you. You lose on every level.

  • @Xellith You can name call all you want, I couldn't care less. You are confused and arrogant at the same time, it's interesting. I've got plenty of education, and plenty of common sense, too. It's not even scientific to just say "well, we've never found a transitory fossil (as many evolutionists will admit, but you'll gloss over that point like always) but evolution just HAS to be true..so...ALL fossils are transitory"! LOL I love shining the light on you guys and watching your indignation.

  • @DCussen /sigh your ignorance knows no bounds. If human beings evolved from a microbe billions of years ago. EVERY and I mean EVERY single lifeform that has been alive from that original microbe is a transitory form. Therefore using common sense you will see that every single lifeform is a transitory form. Your mind just cant comprehend logic. I'm so sorry you arn't capable of grasping common concepts. /pats you on the back. 

  • @Xellith But my mind DOES comprehend logic, unfortunately for you. You've got to stop acting like some intellectual giant. You're a dork. And confused. "Common concepts". I'm sorry, but there has been no evidence, ever, of one species transforming into another species...while magically leaving behind some of the other species behind. That's 18th century science, son, and it's falling apart. You will admit this in ten years. I'm sorry, but I HAVE studied evolution. Try to grasp that.

  • @DCussen 18th century? you DO realise that a lot of what Darwin said about evolution has been corrected/ammended/removed/add­ed to/taken away from his original theory yes? Hence it being a theory - something that will always be developed as more information is acquired. Yes transitional forms have been found and documented etc etc. You are just either willfully ignorant or Stupid. I'm sorry but that's just the way it is. "YOU STOLE FIZZY LIFTING DRINKS. YOU LOSE. GOOD DAY SIR!"

  • @Xellith If you've seen the evidence, please share it with the world. And yah, creationism scares the crap out of evolutionists. (not all scientists - God invented science. He also is much bigger than science, and can't be figured out by man) Evolutionists tend to be vehemently anti-God, and ultimately, that's the agenda of evolutionists. And, when the light gets shined on their own beliefs, they get defensive quick. They are DESPERATE to find a transitory fossil, but NOTHING yet. Sorry.

  • @DCussen /facepalm The evidence is out there but unfortunately people like you are not able to comprehend it - too many big words most likely. And no creationism does NOT scare anybody. You still have yet to present ANYTHING not even a sentence showing why creation is true other than "I said so". Evolution is proven - FACT, Mr "its just a theory". I'm still laughing at you for that btw. I have already explained transitory fossils. But as I already explained - you cant grasp the science.

  • @DCussen btw I'd LOVE to hear some of these facts of the bible... /le sigh. I wish there was someone else I could tag in to take over this discussion since you obviously need 24/7 supervision.

  • @DCussen You sir are a sheep. I pity your future offspring for the wondrous world that you will most likely try and stop them from exploring fully due to your primitive cognitive capabilities.

  • @DCussen talking of double standards: two quotes from god. "all men are created equal" and "a man who lies with another man should be stoned" why aren't the gays equal to the rest of mankind? and if there is truth in the bible's history, where is it? i'm sure any physical proof of the bible's apparant truth's would be in a museum by now, wouldn't it? because people like you wouldn't be able to stop yourself from rubbing it in our faces.

  • @DCussen also, you said "the resurrection of Christ is one of the most provable things in all of history - through SCIENCE." i would love to know where you got that from. because, even with science, resurrection isn't possible. prevention of death, however. THAT is possible.

    i've seen comments by christians who hate creationists. think about that, people who follow the same religious nonsense as you, hate you. how do you carry on knowing that? it'd be like eating peanuts when you're allergic...

  • @KillerKahn Because the scientific method was used to evaluate if it truly happenend. Not just once, but thousands of times from people like you who were DETERMINED to disprove it. To journalists like Lee Strobel - an atheist liberal journalist for the Chicago Tribune who was going to prove to the world how stupid Christians were by exposing the whole resurrection as a fraud. He used legal techniques, as if preparing a court case. Ironically, there was OVERWHELMING evidence that Christ rose.

  • Creationists are stupid?  Let's get the stupidist book of all time - The Origin of Species - and dissect it piece by piece. Now that we have microscopes and understand the complexity of cells, it's falling apart more by the minute. I would encourage you to question the Bible and investigate it's truths. But evolutionists HATE true investigation of their own joke of a religion - evolution. Maybe some of you smart people can tell me where the first living cell came from? Surely you know.

  • @DCussen if evolutionists hate investigation, where is your true dissection of the origin of species? because you mentioned it, then went on some psychobabble about the truths of the bible. i hate this kind of ramble from people like you, which may aswell just say "science doesn't know everything." that's true, but that doesn't mean people like you can fill in the gaps. the bible is fiction. it is not aspirational.

    read the origin of species properly, don't just see the words and make stuff up.

  • @KillerKahn The Bible is fiction? Really? What parts... all of it? Jesus was made up? What about the apostle Paul? What about Abraham (whom the Muslims acknowledge)? Since you know, I'm anxious. As far as evolution, there's no evidence. Not a single transitory fossil Darwin was desperately hoping would eventually validate his philosophy. So, I'm not sure how to read the Origin of the Species according to you, other than just ready it, and then look for evidence LOL.

  • @DCussen all of it is fiction. it's a book of moral stories. no more. and there's plenty of proof for evolution. you just don't want to accept it because you believe in a shiny, beardy figment who lives on a cloud. jesus doesn't exist, noah didn't build not a fucking ark, and moses did not part the red sea witth the will of "god"

    of all the idiots i've come across on youtube. you're the biggest. you still haven't explained your "no evidence" bit of both of your statements.

  • @DCussen

    What "religion"!? What are you talking about!? Are you sane!? Your problem is the ignorance! You can´t stand not knowing/understanding certain things. That coerces you into "believing" weird stuff, either invented by people in gen, or your own imagination. WAKE UP! Some things are unknowable, or unknowable at the present time. Take time to learn, instead of choosing a cheap/easy way of belief!!!

  • There is simple logic for this.

    1. Greediness, Stupidity, Anger (3 poisons) lead people to hardships and sufferings. (from Budda's preaching)

    2. People who are facing hardships than others tend to go to church.

    3. This is why creationists are stupid and greedy.

  • love to show you your error in logic. E-mail me at abebruce@yahoo.com

  • Of all modern Western countries, America is the only country where creationism has a large following.

  • 3:25 is so true lol

  • Next time a creationist says you will burn in hell for eternity, just give a sarcastic "Uh-oh!".

  • cool story broooooo

  • In my opinion, science does disprove god in the same way that your parents disproves Santa Clause's existence!

  • @mrtadreamer Why?

  • Evolutionists and traditional Creationists don't understand the Bible and other ancient texts. Few of the people who know how to read the Bible are are authors like Erich Von Daniken, Rael, Robert Charroux, etc. The new theory of scientific creation of life on Earth made by extraterrestrials (the gods and angels of our legends) will crush Darwinism and God belivers at once.

  • @prototypo Ok so will the Ancient Alien claims explain all of the evidence for evolution thus far? If it can't, what you believe is bullshit. Is it possible humans were genetically engineered by aliens? Possible but you will have to explain all the fossil and genetic evidence of common descent. Good luck.

  • @HybridD91 The Ancient Alien theory doesn't need to explain evidence for evolution. It just explains how the idea for "gods" began and who/what the "gods" were.

  • The funny thing is we DO have the original text of genesis, it's from ancient sumeria and is on clay cuniform tablets. Read Sitchen, you may find "god" again

  • Comment removed

  • Paraphrasing philhellenes "By worshipping such a blooddrenched figure, the religious insult whatever creator there may be, while Atheists, pay much more respect to the creator of the universe, even if it ever existed, more respect than the religious ever can." To me creationism is simply taking that worship one step further.

  • @youarelame84

    So, straight ad hom. And one based on fallacies.

    I don't live on the second floor, nor do I live in an apartment.  But things like facts don't have any meaning for lowlife peole like you. Sockpuppet.

  • @youarelame84

    Jesus is long dead and decayed. IF he ever existed at all.

  • @youarelame84

    What did you say, sockpuppet?

  • @youarelame84

    Whatever, sockpuppet.

  • You know what I dislike? This guy is either generalizing majorly, or is just naive enough to think that NO creationists think about what they believe.

  • @youarelame84

    Says the sockpuppet.

  • @youarelame84

    Oh, yeah, almost forgot ... a sockpuppet says what?

  • @youarelame84

    We? He? Who are you talking to? Your imaginary friend?

  • What god claims to love everyone but hates who don't thank him daily, kills who deface him, hates who use the "god given gift of free will" who hates gays who are still people, who hates blacks, and potrays black as darkness, but they are still people, hates those enough to cause disaster risking the lives of the innocent in that earthquake. What god kills his son to save the sinned race of his guilt?

  • I've just worked it all out everyone is an asshole... that by definition is hell!!... where as me on an island with no religous idiota's, beautiful women and a natural activity is heaven!!! so I'm an atheist that just proven what hell and heaven is...so in a way the religous nuts are partly right and the atheists are also right... (god is the ultimate atheist so whats with all the religous people?)

  • if a god existed he wouldn't not show himself to us. the only reason the bible or any holy book for that matter, is to control people. im surprised and appauled that on this day march 16 2011, religion still exists.

  • Creationists are this way because the religion they follow has been drilled into their heads, they say they are open minded but they are not.

  • @Boxanadu

    Well, they are willing to believe anything that supports their belief in God, so they are open minded in THAT sense! LOL!

    But their minds are completely closed off to any logic or evidence that argues against their religious beliefs.

  • @DNAunion That is true, but their real character is revealed when two words aree brought forth, ATACAMA DESERT!!!!

  • I'm an atheist but imagine for a moment that the religious folks are right! If this is true he/she/it is obviously an entity with a great sense of humor who can bend time and set up disproof of his exsistance. Why also did he make all the dumb-asses into his most diehard proponants?

  • Faith was designed for the dumb people and the people who dont have critical thinking skills. Faith requires no evidence or testing. I just involves obeying and keeping your eyes and ears shut tight and just keep believing whatever you have been told. Science is for the brave - those willing to question the universe around them. Faith is for the weak - those unwilling to open their mind to reality.

  • @Xellith So all scientists must be atheists then, right? That's your logic although I use that word loosely. Calling someone weak because they choose to believe in something shows flaws in your own judgement. Your reality is an obsession with a physical world. We don't know everything. In fact, we probably know next to nothing. If you can find a way to "test" for God, please let your 'brave' scientific community know.

  • @Sempi10 Not all scientists are atheists. However those that are actually doing beneficial things by creating new fields and exploring areas we know exist will not let things like god stand in the way. They will use the scientific method to discover truths and not use a "holy book" that has the "true" word of god in it. Truth that explains NOTHING of the natural word and has less morals than a repeat child sex abuser.

  • @Sempi10 and you talk of reality. Reality is by definition things that exist - in contrast to things that do not exist and things that are imaginary. While its true we dont know everything - believing something to be true just because you were told to is pretty frikin childish and stupid. Its like raising someone to believe that santa claus is real and never telling them its not. Thats your argument? really? Or should I start believing in unicorns because someone else does? evidence plz

  • @Xellith may i spread your comment as a quote? =D

  • @MrTacticalinuit Of course - you need not have asked.

  • thank you, creationists is making us believers look so stupid....

  • and yes jesus does exist scientists always try to come up with logical explanation you athiest are retarted god will come one day and destroy you everything has to do with science and he created this world because he loves us and is not trying to trick to trick anyone and you are just throwing in random words to make yourself look smart and you are extremely fat lose some wheight jackass

  • @xxIgUaNaMaNiAcxx1593 Oh the typical christian response. Please, think of the all the people in world who exist, and have existed, who do not and did not beleive in the christian god. And don't say, God gave them a chance, but they didn't take it. Okay, so you're saying that the Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, and many more civilizations made up their fantastic beleifs when God was clearly and easily evident to them?

    Christianity is nearing is downfall, in a few centuries, it will be taught

  • @xxIgUaNaMaNiAcxx1593 ( number 2) as an ancient religion, one that no one beleives anymore. Why? Because only a very small minority will be Christian. Just like today only a very small minority actually still beleive in the Egyptian and Greek/Roman gods.

  • Turn away from what the world says about Jesus and seek him for yourself. Time is running out! Accept him into your life before it's too late. Revelation 3:20 "Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me."

  • @Chrismarr2

    Personally, I don't want Jesus coming into me. But if that floats your boat ....

  • Let's say God is real. How did he "paint" our whole universe without anything to "paint" with? De he just shoot space rocks and shit from his hands? Who created God? Did he just appear?

  • @TymesRhymes The same concept in questioning origin can be applied to ANY theory one could imagine..."Well than, what created/initiated that?" It's a rather unintelligent proposition given it's instant backfiring effect. Welcome to Theoretical Physics. Proof we know very little of anything absolute about our origin and there is no disproof of a higher power. People should just get real with their surroundings and leave their garbage personal interpretations at home, that ain't how Science works.

  • @JustinLB82

    " there is no disproof of a higher power"

    There is no disproof of Leprechauns or magical unicorns either.

  • @DNAunion Unicorns aren't magic dude.

  • @JustinLB82

    Magical unicorns are.

  • @DNAunion Come on man, there no such thing as magic. lol

  • @JustinLB82

    God uses magic ... why can't my unicorns?

  • go watch my response video on why richard dawkins and his darwinist followers are actually the stupid ones

  • @ChristiansForUnity

    No. If you've got some evidence you want to show us, then go get it, bring it, and post it.

  • This guy is seriously clueless.

    He's talking about hell now...

  • I think this guy's clueless.

  • Here is my question: What is it to you that other people believe God or gods exist?

    If you do not believe in any type of creator or diety, god for you. Why do you feel the need to disprove the belief of others? Is it because of all the killing in the name of "God"? There are plenty of people who killing in the name of other things than a god. I would also like to know why you resort to using insults a 5-year-old would use. "Stupid", really? Why not call them "poop-heads" while you are at it?

  • @7danyul7 ..Because "stupid" is the most fitting description, cleverness be damned.

  • @4eyedCyclopes "damned"? If God does not exist, there is no such thing as damnation. I am pointing out this guy's lack of intellect. I am not arguing whether there is or is not a god, I am asking him why he feels the need to come out in public, speak out against the existence of God, attempt to come off as intelligent and then use a very limited vocabulary and explanation. This seems to be a huge characteristic in both theists and atheists alike. I wonder why.

  • @7danyul7 just having people believeing in fairy tales thats a problem in and of itself. they are flattly stupid

  • @kokofan50 Your answer to my question sounded like like this to me: "People who believe in God are stupid beacuse they are stupid." I do appreciate your response though.

  • @7danyul7 what i was saying is why we call creastionists stupid is because they are. even theiests think creastionists are stupid. the other part was my oppinon

  • @7danyul7

    So you are agreeing with kokofan50 when he equates believing in God to believing in fairy tales.

  • @DNAunion No, I was politely pointing out that he didn't answer my question. People can believe whatever they would like. I just don't undersand why someone would want to post a video of themselves trying to get a point across by using a limited vocabulary and tossing out insults. If someone want's others to listen, why not try using a more intelligent approach?

  • @7danyul7

    You're whining.

    If you have something of worth to say about the video, then go ahead.

  • @DNAunion Am I? I believe that is your own egocentric point of view on what I am saying. I actually just watched your post on creation vs chance and liked the way you approached it. You stated the facts and did it in an intelligent way. I was just trying to understand why this guy feels the need to drop insults rather than just stating the facts. I am just someone who wants to hear all sides and come to my own conclusion.

  • @7danyul7

    You should stop whining about how you perceive his delivery of the points and start addressing the points themselves.

    Pick some claim he made that you disagree with and explain why you disagree with it.

  • @DNAunion I disagree with his approach. Nothing more. I can hardly debate this guy in 500 words or less (not that I am looking to debate him).

  • @DNAunion I only disagree with his approach. It looks like you are looking for a debate or discussion of some sort. I just sent you a message. Feel free to tear it up. I have a feeling you are looking for someone to sink your teeth into.

  • @7danyul7

    So you are whining, like I said.

  • @DNAunion Coming from a 48-years-old man, not married, rents a small apartment or lives in someone elses home, spends many hours making youtube videos that argue people who have a much higher form of education than you. Also,with those videos, reading from a script based on something someone else wrote and unable to come down to a philosophical level rather than renting the opinion of someone else. If you see it as whining,I will accept your label and think nothing more of it from here on out.

  • @7danyul7

    You are whining AGAIN!

    Stop attacking people and start attacking their arguments.

  • @DNAunion Why? I do not disagree with the arguments themselves. I just disagree with the pretentious and immature approach some of you tend to take. You're obviously unable to to comprehend where I am coming from. People like you aren't worth arguing with anyway. There's no reward in arguing with a 48 year old undergraduate. If anyone is whining, it's you. Your'e a pseudo-intellectual at best and that's ok. Youtube wars are obviously what gives your life meaning and I wish you the best(whining)

  • @7danyul7

    You don't disagree with arguments, but you want to whine your head off.

    My bad, you're not a whiner, but an asshole.

  • @DNAunion Yes, I am an asshole. But at least I am an asshole who actually has a formal audience when I am speaking. I am also an asshole who does not have to resort to spending hours making videos of myself spewing rhetoric and then confirming my lack of social abilities by calling people names. I've seen what you say to other people on other posts. I actually pity someone who feels the need to spend so much time trying to convince others he knows only as much as what a book tells him. good luck

  • @7danyul7

    Yes, you are an asshole.

    And your entire post was one big ad hom. Again.

  • @DNAunion It took you four days to come up with that, huh? Well,sir. As fun as it has been leading you into looking stupid, reading and listening to your pseudo intellectual rhetoric. I will not be responding to any more of your childish posts. I will allow you to get in the last word if you would like. I, unlike you, actually have a life and cannot waste any more of it reading or writing to someone who obviously has deep seated emotional problems. Get a PhD, write a book, then come talk to me.

  • @7danyul7

    No, stupid, it didn't take me 4 days to come up with that. Logic is clearly not you strong point. Asshole.

  • @DNAunion :)

  • @DNAunion I do also want to point out that I do not think you saw my intial question. Condemnation without investigation is a dangerous thing. Luckily in this case, your'e just some guy that makes videos of yourself reading from other peoples research findings and TRYING to make it look as if this, somehow, makes you look superior. Why don't you go back to school and become a college professor? I might actually have a shred of respect for you if you did.

  • @7danyul7

    An asshole says what?

  • You did a good job; I like this video

    make more!

    =3

  • Straw man is a logical fallacy term that SMART people use. FSM is a symbol to display just how absurd religion is. You cannot disprove the FSM any more than god.

  • And im talking to you because i think you are stupid.

  • google astrotheology and jesus

  • Note to atheists and especially the anti-theist atheists: quit using the same stupid labled terms like "straw man" and "flying spaghetti monster." By now it's getting very old and it's not convincing people such as my mom or dad that you are anything but arrogant and quite stupid for simply rehashing the same thing over and over. It's as bad as those pushing the Bible. There is a reason this fat boy only gets 4,200 views... he stinks, and he's a lemming.

  • Okay, geniuses who do not believe, consider this? Back in 1953 it was shown that r-handed and l-handed amino acids can be produced in a laboratory environment simulating premordial earth and a bolt of lightning. Neato! So, then, even though a scientist was able to prove this they also show that a scientist in 1953 in an out-of-date lab can do it, why couldn't an alien species do the same thing but with advanced technology. Even Dawkins admits this. So, atheistliberty-- YOU ARE THE IDIOT.

  • @RayTech1970

    Where did the alien species come from?

  • @roqsanda maybe because your a tard?

  • Comment removed

  • Some creationists are stupid because they believe in a holy book and when asked how do they know the holy book is really carrying the words of God, their answer is 'because the holy book says so'.

  • @nimitzclass How do they know that spider-man isn't real? The Marvel comics says so! lol.

  • @nimitzclass All creationists are stupid because that's what they believe in.

  • How I became an atheist: I left one lie to believe another