I am very happy to see the vidoe Armadillo Aerospace's successful attempt to qualify to win Level 2 of the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You
I Love The Video Watch Flight 2 of Armadillo Aerospace's successful attempt to qualify to win Level 2 of the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge It Can Increase My Knowledge
I Really Like The Video Watch Flight 2 of Armadillo Aerospace's successful attempt to qualify to win Level 2 of the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge From Your
Your Video Watch Flight 2 of Armadillo Aerospace's successful attempt to qualify to win Level 2 of the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge Is Very Useful Sharing
@kousoulides This thing is designed to be flown on the moon, under a vacuum: once the oxygen has been cut off, the residual fuel cannot burn like it is doing on earth, so you won't need a fire extinguisher.
@mrplease66 look Mr. news guy : first of all you can't diagnose the reason of the flames on youtube maybe the liquid oxygen was leaking too did you exam the Nozzle ?!!
second don't you see that there is some one already mention that theory before you? what the point of repeating his talk ?!!
Of course it doesn't fly to the Moon! The Lunar Module didn't fly to the Moon itself, that's why the Saturn V was made! This is just the LANDER, it would be boosted into orbit and to the Moon by a larger rocket.
That was one brave dude running out there with the fire extinguisher after landing and engine shutdown. You could see the lander oscillate vertically in the hover.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Why are so many of my comments negatived out so they're not shown!!?
Anyways, this thing is not as good as it looks, I asked if it could lift up a 5 ton satellite into orbit and they said no and THAT IT CANNOT EVEN GET INTO OBIT by itself...soooo, I guess that closes down this project pretty fast. Shame too cuz it was looking pretty good for a bit there.
This rocket is designed to be a lander, not a lifter. An even bigger rocket will lift a lander like this to space. Then the lander will land on something.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Right, you mean it's to land on the moon, right? Like I said, the scientists I spoke with who were part of this project said it cannot even get itself to the moon.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What do you mean it doesn't fly to the moon? Then how does the rocket make it into orbit then? You aren't making sense, did you leave out a sentence by accident? My weekend scientists club and I have calculated this 10 times now, there simply is no way THIS ROCKET IN THE VIDEO CAN GET INTO ORBIT!! It simply hasn't enough fuel. Oh, and you don't have to be all mean to me. I'm just trying to make science friends here. So, I forgive you, my friend.
they have really improved the stability and fuel consumption of this lander. Sure it has taken lot's of time and money but something as complicated as this really has to work right the first time. Noticed that there are no small burners to control flight attitudes like the older versions.
Of course, it should be mentioned that this vehicle cost a few magnitudes less than something done by one of the big aerospace companies(like the DC-X) - many people in Armadillo Aerospace are usually programming computer games for a living.
That it does not do a engine purge after cut-off is still not bad enough to make forget that it was able to fly nearly the full level 2 trip.
As long as they remember to stow a fire extinguisher to put the contraption out after you arrive at your destination! LMAO "Ladies and gentlemen will have landed at lunar outpost 4. You will be allowed to disembark if the ground crew manages to extinguish our spacecraft. In the event they are unsuccessful urinate on yourself and any near by children and await further instructions."
Yes they have, However, those jet packs spend there fuel rapidly (empty tank in 30 sec + or -). Moreover, the jet packs your talking of use high grade H2O2 as fuel (i think it's pressurized and a silver mesh creates the reaction that turns H2O2 into steam for thrust) and it's hard to get and or refine.
Ok, FIRST OF ALL, WHO THE HECK KEEPS GIVING ME THE NEGATIVE THUMBS DOWN?!!!
To EvilSpork29, I already admitted that the car would need some additional equipment to work, like big tires and something to put oxygen into the engine because gasoline needs oxygen to burn and there just isn't enough on the moon. Plus you'd have to put a lot of sealer stuff on the inner part of the car to make it air tight so you don't lose your air inside it.
Thanks both brightanswers and soolew7 for your interesting comments - I'm really nitpicking here, and I should really join in the congratulations for another fine Armadillo task accomplished brilliantly.
I wish them the best of luck in their race to the moon.
"One weight savings that we made was to take out the manifold purges and their plumbing. In hindsight, this wasn't worth the savings. The engine starts and runs fine, but it doesn't shut down cleanly, leaving licks of fire going for a while" "I didn't want to touch the perfectly working Super Mod at that point, but we are going to put them back on this week."
The Armadillo guys seem completely unfazed that their rocket lander is on fire at the end... just mosey up to that burning rocket engine and dust it down, no problem.
Unfortunately guys with extinguishers won't be present on the surface of the moon.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It's quite impressive, except the landing which is very rough, you'd break glasses and stuff stored inside, so it's not practical. Back to the drawing boards boys.. oops, we're in the modern era where people now use "she" instead of "he" to refer to "people" in general... so I meant to say, "back to the drwaing boards ma' ladies"... oops, but that may sound too galant and I may be taken to court by the NAACP.. oh man, I just can't win, can I? ..sigh..
What are you talking about only 1/6th the gravity on the moon, its going to be a very soft landing. You do realize that this IS the drawing board right? So far they are doing pretty Fing great, you are just looking at anything to pick at. Look in the the mirror and do the same.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I'm not NITPICKING! I'm just saying it was a hard landing! And as I POINTED OUT ABOVE, a CAR has MUCH BETTER FUEL ECONOMY!!! Why fly when you can drive!! Gosh! Think about all the carbon debt they're putting us in, it is bad enough with Bush and his rockets of death, but now they have this Scorpius thing adding to the green house gasses ... can't we make an electric car or soemthing instead?!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yeah, it may be bigger than a person, but you still cannot ride in it to Mars, so it's a total waste of money. I know I'm not buying one. Besides, flipping' government will probably require a pilot's license anyways.
Couple notes on my 2nd viewing...in Hi-Def note the shockwave diamonds in the exhaust stream and it's fun to watch John Carmac's software wiggle the rocket nozzel back and forth stabalizing the landing. I believe that the duration is selected to simulate an actual lunar landing sequence. The rocket is almost all fuel and oxidizer tanks, enough propellant for the couple minutes' flight.
Great! You only really get a sense of scale at the end of the video and was quite surprised at the size of it.. Out of curiosity was that a UAV launched at 2:15 off to the right?
Well, the government won't fully disclose what that 2:15 object was, other than to say the typical explanation of a "weather balloon" which I and my UFOcon comittee know is total bull malarkey (or however you spell malarky). A local rastaurant waitress said she saw it out the window of the local Big Boys and saw "grey" beings inside with big black eyes.. I smell yet another gov't coverup.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Not really... It looks to be about 22 gallons of fuel and it only traveled about 100 meters round-trip. With that much gas I can go about 720 miles in my car, thus the car is far more efficient. Granted, the car cannot fly, but my frien's small prop plane still would get about 400 miles on that much fuel.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Well, I mean, of course I know a plane cannot fly on the moon due to the low air content, and I realize it's possible a normal car may have to be outfitted a lot to work on the moon, affecting gas mileage, but my point is that a car would go SO MUCH further. Rockets are cool, but impractical.
Besides no one ever having claimed that "we are all the same", it's funny how some people see their obsessions everywhere, isn't it? Poor you, you must have real nightmares.
Maybe they need to find a way to turn something like into a commercializable product, to reap more rewards from their fine work.
I wonder if there's some kind of dual-use alternative market for something like this? How about making a small miniaturized version that could be marketed as a toy for adult geeks? (aka "overgrown kids")
I am very happy to see the vidoe Armadillo Aerospace's successful attempt to qualify to win Level 2 of the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You
Ondelendo 3 weeks ago
I Love The Video Watch Flight 2 of Armadillo Aerospace's successful attempt to qualify to win Level 2 of the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge It Can Increase My Knowledge
bebeheuy 3 weeks ago
Nice Video See Super Mod aka Scorpius return from the lunar surface pad to its original start position That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
willamricard 3 weeks ago
I Really Like The Video Watch Flight 2 of Armadillo Aerospace's successful attempt to qualify to win Level 2 of the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge From Your
imegatrone 3 weeks ago
Your Video Watch Flight 2 of Armadillo Aerospace's successful attempt to qualify to win Level 2 of the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge Is Very Useful Sharing
bundawartini 3 weeks ago
now i wanna play lunar lander
devofreqo 2 months ago
Lol i thought it was a small craft until i saw the guy come out with a fire extinguisher. Lol i was like WHOA.
vigorousAtheist 3 months ago
WOW That's freaking COOL!!!
seabees2009 3 months ago
Hey, I thought it is 10-storeys building high after reading top comments.
igatube 3 months ago
IS THERE ANYTHING JOHN CARMACK CANT DO BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE?
qwasd0r 4 months ago 4
I kept waiting for it to start saying, "I am Nomad."
mjkobb 8 months ago
RAGE! DOOM 4!!!
WindKun 9 months ago
IFO!!!
featheredmusic 9 months ago
so astronauts just need to carry a fire extinguisher with them.
kousoulides 11 months ago
@kousoulides This thing is designed to be flown on the moon, under a vacuum: once the oxygen has been cut off, the residual fuel cannot burn like it is doing on earth, so you won't need a fire extinguisher.
piranha031091 10 months ago
@piranha031091 :) Ok thanks for the answer.
kousoulides 9 months ago
@kousoulides there is no O2 in space
shebotnov 8 months ago
so the astronaut who will drive this thing to the moon should have a Fire extinguisher to shut down the engine ??!!!!
Elamin008 1 year ago
@Elamin008 if it where to go into space and they cut off fuel there would be no oxygen to power the flame.
xLightningShotx 1 year ago
@Elamin008 News Flash: No Atmosphere on moon! Flames visible at the end are from residue in the nozzle.
mrplease66 1 year ago
@mrplease66 look Mr. news guy : first of all you can't diagnose the reason of the flames on youtube maybe the liquid oxygen was leaking too did you exam the Nozzle ?!!
second don't you see that there is some one already mention that theory before you? what the point of repeating his talk ?!!
Elamin008 1 year ago
@Elamin008 how can you have fire without an oxidizer?
shaygahweh 11 months ago
It's not a UFO...it's a weather balloon...
zcg3 1 year ago
A ufo! That's what I call, Suck it up to land.
dustergirl107 1 year ago
wow super cool
sanaph 1 year ago
This is an UFO..........
ferrarif40owner 1 year ago
luv it, that thing is relentless!
09rockmusic 1 year ago
3:22 ..man, you are my new personal hero...
MrPianoguitar 1 year ago
A big cigarette lighter!!! Fine!!!
PY2RPJ 1 year ago
Of course it doesn't fly to the Moon! The Lunar Module didn't fly to the Moon itself, that's why the Saturn V was made! This is just the LANDER, it would be boosted into orbit and to the Moon by a larger rocket.
Tyrannobeast 2 years ago
How does this keep level! This and the Masten lander I just watched have astounded me
GT4604 2 years ago
That was one brave dude running out there with the fire extinguisher after landing and engine shutdown. You could see the lander oscillate vertically in the hover.
justchillwidit 2 years ago 2
Phenomenal !.
10DieterJamin 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why are so many of my comments negatived out so they're not shown!!?
Anyways, this thing is not as good as it looks, I asked if it could lift up a 5 ton satellite into orbit and they said no and THAT IT CANNOT EVEN GET INTO OBIT by itself...soooo, I guess that closes down this project pretty fast. Shame too cuz it was looking pretty good for a bit there.
ymi2b 2 years ago
This rocket is designed to be a lander, not a lifter. An even bigger rocket will lift a lander like this to space. Then the lander will land on something.
sillyarms 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Right, you mean it's to land on the moon, right? Like I said, the scientists I spoke with who were part of this project said it cannot even get itself to the moon.
ymi2b 2 years ago
@ymi2b
That's not how it works you fucking moron. Rockets send this into orbit, it doesn't fly all the way there!!
I'm fairly certain I know the answer to this, but did you graduate high school?
savemyplaylist 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What do you mean it doesn't fly to the moon? Then how does the rocket make it into orbit then? You aren't making sense, did you leave out a sentence by accident? My weekend scientists club and I have calculated this 10 times now, there simply is no way THIS ROCKET IN THE VIDEO CAN GET INTO ORBIT!! It simply hasn't enough fuel. Oh, and you don't have to be all mean to me. I'm just trying to make science friends here. So, I forgive you, my friend.
ymi2b 2 years ago
@ymi2b
It's not supposed to you fucking retard!!! It's supposed to descend from the orbiting craft that GETS it to the moon!!!
Wiki: Lander_(spacecraft)
savemyplaylist 2 years ago
@ymi2b
"weekend scientists club"
-You troll son of a bitch, you actually had me there for a second.
savemyplaylist 2 years ago
Wow, that's really good run time!
teslognet 2 years ago 2
i really need somebody to .... Well come and find out^^
SexxyyAmber88 2 years ago
WOW!
mackjsm 2 years ago 3
*shakes hand*
WELL DONE! :D
stahlhammer 2 years ago 3
Whaooo ! really impressive test !!
what's this engine ?
laurenzo42 2 years ago 3
they have really improved the stability and fuel consumption of this lander. Sure it has taken lot's of time and money but something as complicated as this really has to work right the first time. Noticed that there are no small burners to control flight attitudes like the older versions.
guitarzero 2 years ago
Of course, it should be mentioned that this vehicle cost a few magnitudes less than something done by one of the big aerospace companies(like the DC-X) - many people in Armadillo Aerospace are usually programming computer games for a living.
That it does not do a engine purge after cut-off is still not bad enough to make forget that it was able to fly nearly the full level 2 trip.
Urwumpe 2 years ago
2:43 lovely shot
zerosonico 2 years ago
Well we are wacthing you and the unc. sam knows we are watchin u..very primitive and good immagination
trianglepoint 2 years ago
I swear that is great.
muslemassry 2 years ago
Comming along very nicely indeed :) Great engineering like this puts us one step closer to commercial space travel.
Nordiclegion 2 years ago 3
As long as they remember to stow a fire extinguisher to put the contraption out after you arrive at your destination! LMAO "Ladies and gentlemen will have landed at lunar outpost 4. You will be allowed to disembark if the ground crew manages to extinguish our spacecraft. In the event they are unsuccessful urinate on yourself and any near by children and await further instructions."
TheANTISEMITE 2 years ago
Probably not an issue on the moon without an atmosphere to sustain a fire. :)
Padwan2 2 years ago
lol :)
anbo369 2 years ago
What a beautiful sound.
operonrs 2 years ago 2
I can see this technology being applied to a shitload of badass things. Well done guys!
GLeNss 2 years ago 2
outstanding, especially the massive stability on the yaw
p1ayaone 2 years ago 5
jetpacks can't be that far away. That was awsome!
magnetichaze 2 years ago
Jetpacks have been around since 1949.
TheANTISEMITE 2 years ago
Yes they have, However, those jet packs spend there fuel rapidly (empty tank in 30 sec + or -). Moreover, the jet packs your talking of use high grade H2O2 as fuel (i think it's pressurized and a silver mesh creates the reaction that turns H2O2 into steam for thrust) and it's hard to get and or refine.
magnetichaze 2 years ago
Third time's the charm...
Man this thing is so awesum. It looks sooo surreal, like some flying saucer or something.
Great job Armadillo! Congratulations! Your ship is outta this world!
skytreker 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ok, FIRST OF ALL, WHO THE HECK KEEPS GIVING ME THE NEGATIVE THUMBS DOWN?!!!
To EvilSpork29, I already admitted that the car would need some additional equipment to work, like big tires and something to put oxygen into the engine because gasoline needs oxygen to burn and there just isn't enough on the moon. Plus you'd have to put a lot of sealer stuff on the inner part of the car to make it air tight so you don't lose your air inside it.
ymi2b 2 years ago
Great job guys!! I wish my days at the office were like that! :)
Hootz99 2 years ago
well said!
slafkec 2 years ago
Superb work guys!
sjhippie 2 years ago
Way cool!But we need some new words.They could call it something like "Grungerstryf"or whatever.great video!!
sirnicholson 2 years ago
out-fucking-standing!
sempertard 2 years ago
Thanks both brightanswers and soolew7 for your interesting comments - I'm really nitpicking here, and I should really join in the congratulations for another fine Armadillo task accomplished brilliantly.
I wish them the best of luck in their race to the moon.
belisariusorb 2 years ago
But I suppose what really impresses me is their total nonchalance in the presence of burning rocket fuel... I wish I was that brave!
belisariusorb 2 years ago
belisariusorb, this is from the latest AA update.
"One weight savings that we made was to take out the manifold purges and their plumbing. In hindsight, this wasn't worth the savings. The engine starts and runs fine, but it doesn't shut down cleanly, leaving licks of fire going for a while" "I didn't want to touch the perfectly working Super Mod at that point, but we are going to put them back on this week."
soolew7 2 years ago
Congratulations to the Armadillo team! That is a beautiful sight.
DavidJBuchner 2 years ago
The Armadillo guys seem completely unfazed that their rocket lander is on fire at the end... just mosey up to that burning rocket engine and dust it down, no problem.
Unfortunately guys with extinguishers won't be present on the surface of the moon.
belisariusorb 2 years ago
No will there be the oxygen in the atmosphere to help the flames burn, so I shouldn't imagine that's a problem...
brightanswers 2 years ago
nozzle swivels when near ground to compensate?
kam75 2 years ago
OMG! I WANT one!!! :OD
coldstoragevideo 2 years ago
Dave's Farm needs to get into the contest!
czubspenx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it looks like some kind of freaky S & M anal toy.
r32adt3db 2 years ago
Haha i thought that thing was tiny in the beginning but the end really suprised me
Maux4200 2 years ago 11
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's quite impressive, except the landing which is very rough, you'd break glasses and stuff stored inside, so it's not practical. Back to the drawing boards boys.. oops, we're in the modern era where people now use "she" instead of "he" to refer to "people" in general... so I meant to say, "back to the drwaing boards ma' ladies"... oops, but that may sound too galant and I may be taken to court by the NAACP.. oh man, I just can't win, can I? ..sigh..
ymi2b 2 years ago
What are you talking about only 1/6th the gravity on the moon, its going to be a very soft landing. You do realize that this IS the drawing board right? So far they are doing pretty Fing great, you are just looking at anything to pick at. Look in the the mirror and do the same.
PosVibeMerc 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm not NITPICKING! I'm just saying it was a hard landing! And as I POINTED OUT ABOVE, a CAR has MUCH BETTER FUEL ECONOMY!!! Why fly when you can drive!! Gosh! Think about all the carbon debt they're putting us in, it is bad enough with Bush and his rockets of death, but now they have this Scorpius thing adding to the green house gasses ... can't we make an electric car or soemthing instead?!
ymi2b 2 years ago
Wow, did not realise how big that thing was till the end!
runajayrun 2 years ago
OMG.. i had thought that thing was small.. like ... toy kindda small.. till the end! its bigger then a person!
cybertai33 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah, it may be bigger than a person, but you still cannot ride in it to Mars, so it's a total waste of money. I know I'm not buying one. Besides, flipping' government will probably require a pilot's license anyways.
ymi2b 2 years ago
Cool video.
I seriously thought it was only 2 feet high all the way up to the end. when those people ran out it changed my whole perspective.
Meejoe27 2 years ago 28
Same here.
MattUK2007 2 years ago
@Meejoe27 Yeah, I agree. That is bizarre. It almost looked unreal based on my previous perception. Wow, that's a pretty cool rocket.
bobbycratchit 1 year ago
@Meejoe27 My God, they hired two genetically modified midgets to put out the fire. With tiney fire extinguishers. Amazing work.
gmanzeroalpha 5 months ago
Couple notes on my 2nd viewing...in Hi-Def note the shockwave diamonds in the exhaust stream and it's fun to watch John Carmac's software wiggle the rocket nozzel back and forth stabalizing the landing. I believe that the duration is selected to simulate an actual lunar landing sequence. The rocket is almost all fuel and oxidizer tanks, enough propellant for the couple minutes' flight.
patswickedpissah 2 years ago
Looks like very good control and a long duration flight! Congratulations!!
Davidgojr 2 years ago
Great! You only really get a sense of scale at the end of the video and was quite surprised at the size of it.. Out of curiosity was that a UAV launched at 2:15 off to the right?
flujotech 2 years ago 2
some debris blown up from the ground is what it looks like
79catcer 2 years ago
Well, the government won't fully disclose what that 2:15 object was, other than to say the typical explanation of a "weather balloon" which I and my UFOcon comittee know is total bull malarkey (or however you spell malarky). A local rastaurant waitress said she saw it out the window of the local Big Boys and saw "grey" beings inside with big black eyes.. I smell yet another gov't coverup.
ymi2b 2 years ago
As I watch this, I see a great civilization spanning this whole star system and preparing for first manned flight outside the Oort cloud...
z0nt21 2 years ago 3
nice.
BaronVonGotha 2 years ago
such a LONG burn time for something so small! very efficient
dobberdoss 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Not really... It looks to be about 22 gallons of fuel and it only traveled about 100 meters round-trip. With that much gas I can go about 720 miles in my car, thus the car is far more efficient. Granted, the car cannot fly, but my frien's small prop plane still would get about 400 miles on that much fuel.
ymi2b 2 years ago
well duh!, Are you being sarcastic or are you really so stupid as to compare a rocket engine to that of a car for efficiency
dobberdoss 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well, I mean, of course I know a plane cannot fly on the moon due to the low air content, and I realize it's possible a normal car may have to be outfitted a lot to work on the moon, affecting gas mileage, but my point is that a car would go SO MUCH further. Rockets are cool, but impractical.
ymi2b 2 years ago
very nice work, simple design is best
dobberdoss 2 years ago
awesome. Amazing how much control you guys have over the lander.
celshader 2 years ago
Pure win - this video is made of it. Congratulations!
exo762 2 years ago 4
how does it maintain that thrust for so long with that small design?!?
ConcreteColoursTV 2 years ago
Congrats to John and the entire team. Well done. Nice modular spacecraft.
patswickedpissah 2 years ago 4
It is nice to see them go from an idea on a piece of paper to pulling this off.
You GO Armadillo and hope this is just the beginning. :)
DJBREIT 2 years ago
Looks rendered! :)
billyzelsnack 2 years ago
-3 huh? Swoosh.. Above your heads. haha.
billyzelsnack 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dude, don't call people rendered... it's not their fault if they're born that way.. sheesh, have some sensitivity.
ymi2b 2 years ago
Besides no one ever having claimed that "we are all the same", it's funny how some people see their obsessions everywhere, isn't it? Poor you, you must have real nightmares.
Tia1ko 2 years ago
your a really racist redneck asshole
flightrulez 2 years ago
Superb work from the minds of Armadillo!
Maybe they need to find a way to turn something like into a commercializable product, to reap more rewards from their fine work.
I wonder if there's some kind of dual-use alternative market for something like this? How about making a small miniaturized version that could be marketed as a toy for adult geeks? (aka "overgrown kids")
manofsan 2 years ago
Congratulations are in order to the good folks at Armadillo Aerospace, a trully great achievement.
Now I can finaly forgive Carmack for Daikatana :)
tsaranen 2 years ago
Carmack had nothing to do with Daikatana. You must be confusing him with John Romero.
Enderu666 2 years ago 14
Yes indeed that was my mistake. Damn and now I have to add Romero to hit list :)
tsaranen 2 years ago
Ya!!!!!!!!!!
vincecate 2 years ago 2
wow, excllent
itsracktime 2 years ago 4
MASTERFUL WORK! Artistic brilliance. I wish all of you the very best.
jerseystitch 2 years ago 5