PART 1: Interview with Professor Otto E. Roessler about the Dangers at the CERN LHC

[zapproowsdower]

@Standard999999 It doesn't matter what type of particle is being used. All particles, in such an energetic impact, are rendered into their constituent subatomic particles, like quarks, bosons, etc. Whether you're using hydrogen or uranium, the only relevant factor is the energy of impact.

I guess I AM comparing apples to oranges, but if either one were used in the LHC, they would both be smashed into a subatomic mess - and it would be a valid comparison =)

[zapproowsdower]

Err I got that wrong. The LHC at maximum energy output generates 10^14 electron volts. But every day our atmosphere is bombarded with cosmic rays with energies up to 10^20 electron volts.

Do a wikipedia search for "ultra high energy cosmic rays", there's a page dedicated to them.

I think this is mother nature telling us quite conclusively that the LHC is 100% harmless.

[toga2050]

locked within two concentric stable orbits of opposing fields opposite of each other consuming all matter that surrounds them?

[toga2050]

between the two oppositely opposed concentric dipole rings created of opposite charge

[toga2050]

Especially if the heavy ions of the lead packets, or millions of protons, converted into pure energy which transmuted to more than twice the speed of light somehow thereby effectively reversing the electromagnetic field already within the particles into a kind of negative vacuum pressure state with a hole in the middle of these stable particles with a butterfly shaped negative EM/ gravity field that would reverse rotation past the light speed barrier thereby counter-rotating having a jet stream

[toga2050]

Couldn't the lead protons of the nucleus's form a stable strangelet or mini black hole if there were 2 positive top quarks that fused with 2 negative bottom quarks with a charm or vortex in the middle from a reversed negative Boson-Higgs Field of immense EM/ gravitational energy sucking the Earth into it through the dipole or bipole configuration forming a stable jet stream of particles of antimatter out of it from our own matter?

[Prruuhh]

Professor Rössler hat mich sehr beeindruckt durch seine bescheidene Art und durch sein ständiges Bemühen um mehr Sicherheit. Dabei ist es mir unwichtig, welche Theorie schlussendlich bestätigt wird. Ich bin sehr froh, dass bis jetzt noch nichts Schlimmes passiert ist beim LHC.

[icke11234]

@Prruuhh

Was ist mit den Erdspalten und Erdlöchern, die sich plötzlich überall auftun, den massiven Erdrutschen, den nicht enden wollenden Erdbeben? Laut dieser Prognose ist das einfach der Anfang vom Ende: w w w.cerntruth.c o m/?p=50

[truefictions]

Go to Part 4 at around 32 seconds of this interview to understand what the Professor is talking about.

Peace

[oliviamulgrew]

i think this man is brillient and this man is qualified to know this ,,,,thankyou for being brave

[crystalpower08]

Professor Roessler gives sound reasons to call for a halt to the LHC experiments. There has been no proper Environmental Impact Assessment or unbiased Safety assessment of the LHC experiments. The LHC is using OUR planet of 6 billion people as a laboratory when there are risks of dangerous outcomes. Legal injunctions to stop the LHC are hard to obtain because of CERN's position in GENEVA. CERN relies on untested theories to say any black holes created there will evaporate. If they are wrong? SOS

[RedCobra8]

he aint a nut job hes worried of how much power the scientist will use later in time

[TurkiyeCumhurbaskani]

this man Otto is a nut job

[GorgonLuvs8008135]

Is he sitting in some kind of crazy 3d optical illusion?

[LogInForPaper]

This is funny, Otto Rossler is a biochemist, not a physicist.

[LegendaryMotives]

@LogInForPaper

and what kind of expertise do you have?

Im not saying hes right or wrong, but lots of people who disagree with him have no physics background and go off of the words of other physicists. You shouldn't mock him because hes one of maybe 2 people that believe what hes saying is true as Physicists (and scientists in general) have been wrong many times in the past, proven wrong by maybe one or two people.

[LogInForPaper]

@LegendaryMotives

Because you're questioning my expertise. I have a BSc in Physics and am at present pursuing an MSc in Nuclear Physics. Believe me or not.

[LegendaryMotives]

None the less, he shouldn't be mocked because you disagree with him. Clearly hes done a reasonable amount of research that has led him to believe what he does.

[ytmoog]

@LegendaryMotives

"he shouldn't be mocked because you disagree with him."

No, he should be mocked because he is a crank.

"Clearly hes done a reasonable amount of research"

Have you read his paper where he presented his ideas?

It is clear from his paper that he is a joke.

Rössler is not a physicist, and it is very clear from his 'paper' that he does not understand physics either.

[SherrieLeaLaird]

Girls and boys they HIT CERN the MINUTE of the SPIRAL in NORWAY

and I Have a video from MARCH 30 2010 3 3 3 at 3 pm

they caused that Massive Solar Flare that NASA is trying to pawn off as April 21...but they forgot to take the date off. MARCH 30 SOLAR pROMINENCe. thank you fucking CERN 666

[Michel0555]

No way a black hole will be created.

And why? Because we haven't got enough mass to make a black hole on earth.

[LegendaryMotives]

And you're more of an expert on blackholes than this man.

[LogInForPaper]

@LegendaryMotives

This man is a biochemist not a physicist.