If aliens couldn't find fossils of humans, then they wouldn't be looking hard enough. You need more than a thousand years for complete fossilisation to take place, this is why fossils only form in certain places because you need the right conditions.
@gregrutz ....Shell fossils found on TOP layer of Mount Everest. No human or bunny fossils found in that layer. Hmmm...humans never existed! Laughable logic! Layer order or significance is another myth integrated into the Evolution hoax to further the agenda. No part of the world shows a consistent layer order like those found in geology books. The reason is because those layers formed during the flood. And again, don't EVER forget shell fossils on top of Mount Everest are ALL closed.
@gregrutz Nice googling but sadly you simply parrot what others tell you, not putting any thought or logic in what you read. If you understood the works of plate tectonics and the forces involved, you would understand why it is impossible to find intact shells in the closed position. First of all, the concept of layers tilting up/down one over the other is called thrust faulting which is partial and we also have overthrust faulting. This is completely theoretical but plausible.
@gregrutz You must be unbelievably ignorant of physics to not understand how impossible it would be in a mechanical analysis using formulas, physics & civil engineering for that to happen in a grand scale. If it theoretically formed the Everest, the HUGE amount of hundreds of thousands of tons of pressure involved in this layer tilting during millions of years would simply CRUSH ALL shells found in dry land. I see you like an extremely delusional Atheist; I truly feel sorry for you.
@MoooHamMad You are right, I don't know why ''closed'' shell mean anything. They live underground, how are they going to open when they die.
And how did an old sea bed get made into a mountain? There are no shells ''on top'' of the mountain, the whole top of the mountain is limestone, shells a thousand feet thick.
@gregrutz Scientists found nothing more than arguments that fall NOT beyond the realm of speculation. They've found many fossils of animals that are no longer in existence. Then they build a myth around it that fits their Evolution beliefs and sell it to the public. They take advantage of our secular societies that happily accept anything that doesn't promote any kind of god, even if the theory in itself is false. Anyone with enough imagination can attach a storyline to these fossils.
@MoooHamMad There is something called MATH. When you have a range of years (millions) that span between the existence of a species that are linked "theoretically" to another species, you have burdened yourself with the need for extraordinary evidence. According to math and probability, when you have hundreds of millions of years of Evolution, you are expected to find "AT LEAST" millions of transitional fossils to prove the theory and NOT ONLY 10, 100 or even 1000. Evolution is MYTH!
@gregrutz You or any other "Evolutionist" saying things like "most of the fossils are transitional fossils" is no more valid than me or any other "non-Evolutionist" saying things like "most of the fossils are independent fossils, not related to each other". There's no physical way to prove your claim or mine. All we can do is attach vain imaginations, myths, legends and speculation to "the facts". Until you learn this reality, you will continue to dwell into the depths of Greek myths.
@MoooHamMad Science does not comment on the supernatural. The theory explains the facts, the fossils are the facts. Dinosaurs changed over three major time periods, how do you explain the facts?
@gregrutz The fossils are the facts....the facts of what? Just because Evolution makes use of that evidence ("or facts" as you call it) to build on the myth doesn't grant the theory veracity. Collected data or fossils proves nothing. Those are just dead animals, nothing more. Attaching myths like Evolution and claiming "this dinosaur eventually transformed into this one you see here or there" proves nothing but mere conjecture. Facts don't need to be explained, myths do!
@MoooHamMad ''Facts [like dinosarus ruling the world] don't need to be explained, myths do!'' No myths need to be dismissed. You have lost touch with reality. seek help
@gregrutz "No myths need to be dismissed. You have lost touch with reality. seek help"
Mooo: Apparently the one that has lost touch with reality is you & the rest of "Evolutionists" because you have embraced a myth that was placed under the shadow of science and yet you refuse to dismiss it. Fantastic claims of species that transform into other species during millions of years without an iota of evidence except speculation attached to fossils is no more realistic than your next myth.
@gregrutz Oh, nice ad-hominem attack, hmmmm! Let me throw in my own=> Baboon, let me paraphrase what you said in its correct form: "You are too stupid to see the evidence THE WAY WE WANT TO PRESENT IT TO YOU". That's what you really meant. No thank you, I don't believe in Greek myths.
And btw atheists killed 300 million people? Russia and china killed in the name of communism not in the name of atheism. For god sake (its an expression, i can use it) read a objective book from time to time
@alliencedful Ok, here you have an objective reading from a quote made by the Russian Founder of the Russian Communist Party, Vladimir Lenin, one of the greatest Communist leaders of the past century: "OUR PROGRAM NECESSARILY INCLUDES THE PROPAGANDA OF ATHEISM" ...and a century later, 300 million people killed by Communists around the world. They implemented the use of Atheist propaganda successfully for years which explains why they savagely attacked Christians, Jews, etc. Ouch!
@MoooHamMad It's hilarious how you conveniently use russia and china as examples (and half assed ones at that, my previous comment stands, as lenin is not the end all and be all of communism, see maoism stalinism)) While first of all, not even near 300 million were killed, and you don't reply to my comment where i show that religion is the cause of much more death throughout the ages of time. As a matter of fact i wouldn't be surprised if religion was the cause of the very first war.
@alliencedful Why do you need God when you have an all-powerful, all-knowing, and caring deity like Stalin or Kim Jong Ill to look up to? Dictatorships are either atheist or have complete control over religion. They can't have someone above the leader that people look up to.
@cdoftx Dictatorships were the norm in history, and they were religious. So i don't know what you're trying to say here. These dictators claimed to be the chosen representative of god, there were a lot more religious dictators as there were atheist dictators. Btw all dictators are pieces of shit, and to use the argument atheism leads to a dictatorial regime is not only factually incorrect it's also insulting and shows the sophistic way of reasoning among religious people.
@alliencedful I agree with everything you say. I'm just saying that people miss the point when they try to link another's beliefs with tyranny. Any belief can produce a dictatorship, all it takes is the suppression of other beliefs.
@cdoftx You said: "Any belief can produce a dictatorship, all it takes is the suppression of other beliefs"
Mooo: As in Vladimir Lenin saying: "OUR PROGRAM NECESSARILY INCLUDES THE PROPAGANDA OF ATHEISM", then Communism takes over and eventually a massive global genocide against believers, especially Christians, is perpetrated to suppress their faith in order to increase the Communist agenda that "NECESSARILY INCLUDES THE PROPAGANDA OF ATHEISM"? ...the Atheist belief... the religion...
@MoooHamMad Yes, by belief I mean religious belief. Dictators can't have anyone above them, and want people to look to them as their highest authority on everything. Lenin and Mao had atheism. Iran and Saudi Arabia have Shia and Sunni Islam, respectively. In England, the King is still head of the church, and it used to be just as brutal to people with different beliefs a few hundred years ago. Anyways, Lenin did need atheism. There was already a church and it wasn't in his pocket.
how manny people has religion killed; all deaths by aids because of the pope telling people not to use condoms, the crusades, christians started ww2 (nazis were christians), the inquisition, the manny wars in europe in medieval times, the pope was often involved. the conflict between ireland and england, the conflicts in israel, the many wars in africa, the islamic conquests etc. on top of that basicly all pre modern time wars had a religious component to it. colonising in the name of god. etc
the difference between the alien bullshit and real life is that we haven't found 2 species but a buttload of them. It's been suggested that 99.9% of all species to have ever lived are extinct. So that gives science a huge database to do research on and to confirm that species have evolved, and gives you a bunch of retarded arguments that hold up to gullible uneducated uninformed people who do not care about real life but prefer a fantasy in where they are the chosen species of god. Get real.
@KyleAndDougsRandomTV Completely incorrect. I never implied, said, or suggested such idea in this video. So, watch again and again until you understand the message this video is trying to present.
@MoooHamMad No, what I mean is, your agrument in this video in no way presented any kind of evidence against evolution. All you did was give scenerio where aliens find the remains of another race of aliens, and not knowing any better, assumed they were from Earth.
This doesn't help your argument at all. It's unnecessary, and wastes alot of time.
@KyleAndDougsRandomTV You are almost there. Watch it AGAIN! The video is trying to present the viewer certain logic taking an alien scenario as an example to show that the same logic could be applied to Evolution. The same way some individuals of the Beta aliens assumed the Alpha aliens could be originally from planet Earth (when in fact they were not), the same mistakes can be made with the assumptions involved with the theory of Evolution and that all its claims could be in fact WRONG.
"...and that all its claims could be in fact WRONG."
Well, I admire that you used the word "Could" instead of "Are". I'm glad that you're actually being honest and reasonable with your argument, rather than just insisting that you are right (Which is what most creationists seem to do).
But catagorizing fossils isn't really based on assumptions. The newly discovered remains are always studied closely so that the species can be properly classified.
i don't know why i watch this stuff. more and more the people that produce this type of self-inflicted forced ignorance convinve me that this planet would be better without us.
Dinosaurs were also a big hoax so Zionist media producers such as Steven Spielberg could make the Jurassic Park series and con millions of dollars from the worlds public and send it to Israel to fund jihad against Palestine.
u believers of god are a bunch of morons, u cannot prove to me ever, without the me seeing this faggot looking god, and no god isnt the most powerful being bitch, i am. i decide my fate not some peeping tom who u think watches us. jesus is just as fake, he can lck my dick, jesus and the bible are like hitler, a bunch of shennanigons, are a bunch of terrorist who can be linked to alkida. douchebags
Sweet can you also explain how continental drift is a hoax? Or the threory of sexual reproduction is is just a hoax, I like the stork hypothesis better. Also I love your name MooHamMad, did you get your name after the toy stuffed cow they have on the Atheist Experience tv show?
Demon hunters shoot down angels in the sky. In the city of god, they are dying. Mortar shells shatter the walls of holiness. The masses are terrified and screaming. Their hope is lost as god's gold turns to rust. Innocents looking to end their pain. Their pitiful lives come to an end. Satan's wisdom brings us to life. Leaving pain for the cowards to endure. The masses of futility are forgotten. We are the champions and they were defeated. We are as one with the demon's darkness.
@bullwhipjesus And as made up as your myth of dinosaurs that magically transform into chickens, reptiles that magically transform into apes that Atheists LOVE to call "Lucy" and the millions of imaginary transitional fossils that only exists in your Atheistic deluded minds...
@TheDarkLordLucifer And when Jesus returns you will burn for eternity along with your god. Why would you choose destruction when you already have God's love? Just repent..
I mean do you honestly believe that Satan could win against God??? God being the most powerful being EVER?? The creator of the universe?? The creator of Lucifer?? LOL dude.
Crying out from the church, their weak minds already enslaved. Voices of the shadowy realm, the beginning of the end. Powerful demons destroy holy light as he bursts from the earth. The sound of his voice from his kingdom calls to me. Soon, we shall crush their holy hypocrisy. Black magicks now working, powerful spells are cast. Evil in his eyes and darkest blasphemy. Church of christ dies while Lord Satan survives. Seizing power in Satan's name. A life of death is what he craves.
euhm,I hope that you know that all of the wars in history and many today,are all caused by religion or religious people,mister " I'm an O SO GOOD CHRISTIAN" mmmh?! I know many things and spent reading many hours in the Bible,and I realised that It's full of contradictions . I don't believe anything(nor from religion nor some scientific theories) ,because I think we simply do not know.The only thing I fully believe in are facts, it's maybe shallow,I now,but it's all I have.
Typical response from our public school brainwashed darwits. Hey JACK ASS! WHY don't YOU explain it me! I'd love to hear it for the billionth time since it is a different "story" about every six months these days even the theory evolves but only to fit the new theory since the last 5 or six re-vamps have all been debunked. Not even the Darwits themselves can come to a consensus anymore. So go ahead shit for brains
@Ultramediacorp at least theory, or should i say theories, or evolution are developing, and just because its not perfect does not mean bin the whole lot like an angry child in art class, its another thing to say because there's gaps then it must be magic, so god came down and made up evolution to piss you off,
god is a lie, creation by beings beyond earth, maybe god was an alien race,
maybe they were the angels, demons, and god you so cling to.
@TheOnetrueself Is that all you fuckin jerks know how to say is "God did it" Duh as if ANYONE says that, No Google the phrase and the only people saying that are atheists because they simply can't have a dialogue without being the pricks and assholes of the internet and THAT is why they are the most distrusted segment of society
Atheists are now petitioning for the right for consenting adults to have incestuous intercourse. Abortion is okay since children don't have rights, and as we speak the pedophile rights groups will be petitioning for "equality" as long as the child "consents" (just give candy or money and they'll be happy). Sick people.
You're comparing aliens and gorillas together as an evolutionary possibility to early humans and bipeds? Well, bipeds have indisputable similarities to humans, and also: EARLY HUMANS DID NOT HAVE SPACE TRAVEL, IDIOT! Carbon dating much, moron? comparing evolution to the idiotic creationists? thats low. And Atheists are ugly and Christians are pretty? That is generalizing and stupid. GET OFF THE TUBES!
@InnocentLittleBoy said:"this is stupid, evolution makes alot more sense than religion "
yeah but only if you have an axe to grind and hate god for what ever the reason is, it doesn't matter really. No one really believes atheists don't know God exists. They just keep trying to prove it to themselves on places like youtube while they make fun of Christians the only thing they apparently have to do in their pathetic Godless existence
@Ultramediacorp you're so blind that its sad to say the least. Since all you cling to is your bible, then why don't we have a closer look at it? How is it that 2 humans can create the whole human race without such titanic issues as INBREEDING DEPRESSION? Then how do only 8 people do it AGAIN after God floods the world? According to knowledge we've acquired IN MODERN TIMES, this is flat out impossible. Please stick to your blind belief, there are those of us who listen to evidence and reason.
@InnocentLittleBoy Hey ya stupid little piss ant, if evolution is true, inbreeding is just as likely to happen. If two people can't start the human races, how the hell did a we start from nothing? You don't have an answer but I do. LIFE doesn't start from non life. so How did it start then? Remember YOU went this way, I didn't
@Ultramediacorp Dumbass. Evolution happens through a population; one that preceded humans. Not 2 mythical figures who never existed. And answer the Question as to how old the Earth is. Explain how a man can be swallowed by a whale and not die instantly. ANSWER MY PREVIOUS QUESTIONS WITH SCIENCE AND REASONING. DON'T CHANGE THE SUBJECT. Or admit that the Bible is history's greatest hoax. STUPID CHRISTIAN. STOP DENYING HOW FAKE THE BIBLE IS. GO BACK TO YOUR WITCH BURNINGS AND CRUSADES NUMB NUTS
@Ultramediacorp And for your information, Evolution has been witnessed at the microscopic level multiple times. The annual flu season is proof that evolution exists. The evidence of evolution is all around you, unlike evidence for your fake religion. You'd know that if you made it past grade 8 you redneck hillbilly hick. Science has won this debate, so either wake up and live on Earth or stay in your pedophile ridden church and let society go on. I challenge you to answer even 1 of my questions
@InnocentLittleBoy You said this: "Then how do only 8 people do it AGAIN after God floods the world?" to put into doubt the Flood and make claims that 8 people cannot re-populate the Earth to produce the 6 billion we have today. But I'm going to intellectually rape you here with logic and math. Numbers don't lie. Math in all its forms is the purest form of truth.
Now, "N(sub t)" is the future population you intend to calculate. "N(sub 0)" is the original population of the situation under study. "e" is a constant that equals 2.71828. "r" is the growth rate which varies depending on 2 rates. The rate of death calculated by the number of deaths caused by wars, famine, suicides, and natural deaths; and the rate of birth. Both rates define what "r" is. Each country has had different values of "r". At last we have "t" which is the number of years that passed.
N(sub 0)= 8 (Noah and his wife, 3 sons, and their 3 respective wives)
-
e= 2.71828 (a constant, it never changes)
-
r= 0.47% =0.0047 (there are charts and studies that reveal these values per year and decades, so we have to use an average value to simplify this, though we can re-use the formula for each year or decade but the work would be immense)
-
t= 4358 years (today is 2010 AD and the Noah's flood happened in 2348 BC; so 2348+2010 equals 4358 years)
Now we replace variables with their values for this situation & let math show us the truth, N(sub t)=N(sub 0) * (e^(r * t)) --- N(sub t)= 8 * (2.71828^(0.0047 * 4358)) = ??? --- Using a calculator, I will simplify it step by step, N(sub t)= 8 * (2.71828^(20.4826)) then, N(sub t)= 8 * (786093438.89046735214174635322811) and finally, N(sub t)= 6288747511.1237388171339708258249 --- THE GRAND RESULT IS 6,288,747,511 people. Or 6 billion and 288.7 million people approximately. --- THE FLOOD HAPPENED
@MoooHamMad You had time to type all that. Congratulations.
Your math is good, theres no question about that. But you see, math tends to ignore certain facts. There are a few significant problems with the exponential growth population model, which you have just used.
First of all, what if the initial 8 population members had all been males? Would the math pick up on that?
Second, this model assumes that the population has unlimited resources and unlimited space.
@MoooHamMad The problem is that populations rarely have either. As the population grows, there will be fewer resources to go around, which usually results in higher death. Also, overcrowding does tend to attract predators. Not to mention that diseases are spread around easier in these situations. You get the point.
@MoooHamMad Lets put things back into context. This model is usually accurate only for short periods of time, because over time, r just goes in all directions and must be averaged out, therefore it becomes less and less reliable as time goes by. And scientists only rely on this formula to predict the populations of invasive species, since they can usually outcompete other animals for both resources and space. That should say something in itself.
@MoooHamMad So congratulations. By using a simple yet unrealistic population growth model, you indeed proved that by numbers alone, the flood was possible.
@InnocentLittleBoy The population formula isn't unrealistic. It was developed by mathematicians by analyzing "real-life" data. It's used in universities in calculus classes and in real life by experts. You are the only "unrealistic" fool here. "r" already takes into account the factors that you mentioned like deaths, births, and environmental issues that may affect their outcome.
Values of "r" are published periodically and you can re-calculate the formula multiple times for more accuracy by using for example "r" for each 10 years but you would have to calculate 435 times and then add the results. Results will be basically the same since I obtained "r" by using the average of many values of "r" that range from Noah's times to the present.
So sad that you have to go so low as to pathetically deny a formula that has been accepted globally by experts to calculate population just because it shattered all your Atheistic illusions and proved your pre-conceived delusions wrong. Being an Atheist is so delusional... But well, you religious Atheist nuts are too deep into your cult to even realize the outcome of your own stupidity.
@MoooHamMad Yes it is used by experts, but with precaution, because this model always assumes unrestricted growth which is impossible. If you took a real calculus class, you would know that in a situation with a negative r value, the population would grow infinitely small, but never actually go to 0. Does that make sense? to have 0.00000000000001 members of a population?
@InnocentLittleBoy You say "If you took a real calculus class". Ermm, yes I did given the fact that I'm a civil engineer. I took pre-calculus I and II, Calculus I, II and III, Differential equations, and Mathematical Methods. Add to that Statistics for Engineers, Complex Matrices, plus many dozens of Engineering classes that use math to work.
-
The value of "r" can never be negative since it is a proportion between rates of deaths and births and can be no less than 0. Why don't you know that?
@InnocentLittleBoy You say "this model always assumes unrestricted growth which is impossible". Do you know what "average" means? When you take an average of values and use it to represent a global result, such value isn't necessarily located at the middle of the graph representing the model under study. The average is influenced by the "weight" of individual values. If you knew how statistics work, you would know what I'm talking about but you obviously don't.
@InnocentLittleBoy Using an average value for a variable in a formula usually produces results that are similar to the sum of individual results of multiple instances of the same formula representing "segments" of the case under study. Because this formula is designed to produce real-time results, if just ONE sudden change in population growth is strong enough to affect hundreds of OTHER values of "r", such strong sudden change in "r" value will be reflected on the result obtained.
@MoooHamMad In a ww3 scenario, nuclear weapons would probably be used. Even with 8 people left, the human race would be doomed. The Earth would be uninhabitable due to the sheer amount of radiation present, and the lack of agricultural systems. And what are the chances that those 8 people would be within even miles of eachother? Let alone have the skills to survive? Math can only take you so far my friend, there comes a time and place for reality.
@MoooHamMad By the way, please offer some math with respect to your video. What are the chances of an alien civilization finding Earth and coming here AFTER we die off and before our Sun burns out and Earth collapses? Don't forget, Alpha Centauri is more than 4 light years away, and its our closest neighbor. What are the chances of THAT alien race dying off, and ANOTHER alien race finding Earth and coming here, before our Sun burns out and collapses? And did God create aliens as well?
@MoooHamMad And we're talking about an average which is affected by times when people were clearly interested in keeping records of birth and death rates. You still don't get the point, this model assumes UNRESTRICTED GROWTH. No matter what the r value is, it assumes UNRESTRICTED GROWTH. And yes, r IS a constant. I can see you deleted that post, did you realize you were wrong?
@InnocentLittleBoy Once again with the claim that "r" is a constant. Jesus Christ, I hope you're not representative of all Atheists because your ignorance would make them all look very bad.
-
What part of the concept of CONSTANT and VARIABLE you don't understand in the field of mathematics? Go to a freaking college math professor and ask him if "r" in the Population formula is a constant or a variable. What amazes me is how you irrationally refuse to accept that someone corrects you. WOW!
@InnocentLittleBoy This is going to be the last time I correct you and I don't want to you to spread any more of your ignorance in here.
-
A CONSTANT is a term used in formulas which value never changes no matter what situation is being analyzed by the formula at hand. In the case of Population, THE ONLY CONSTANT is "e" which is equal to 2.71828. All other symbols are VARIABLES which are values that may vary depending on the analysis being made. THIS IS INDISPUTABLE. Anything else is IGNORANCE.
@InnocentLittleBoy With respect to your other ignorant argument about the model of Population being a model that assumes UNRESTRICTED GROWTH, don't you understand that a variable such as "r" that takes into consideration birth rates, death rates, famines, wars, genocide, diseases, social quality, medical field improvement, etc, is hardly "UNRESTRICTED"? "r" is also called "The Rate of Natural Increase". For example, in Sweden, 2007, "r" was 0.2% but in Sri Lanka, 2007, it was 1.3% Why?
@InnocentLittleBoy Because variables are affected by the factors they involve. In 2007, Sri Lanka had a population growth rate greater than that of Sweden for the same year because the factors involved were far more significant than those factors affecting Sweden. The population formula can be used in Calculus III to take into account input changes for its variables, including "r". When you integrate in Calculus (known as INTEGRATION), you specify a RANGE OF VALUES that affect the final result.
@InnocentLittleBoy Integration takes into consideration a range of values that when plotted as a graphic, allows you to see how its value changes with respect to the variable time or compared against any other variable. Do you know what a GRAPHIC CALCULATOR is? It is a calculator with the capabilities to plot a graphic that visually represents an INTEGRAL FORMULA and DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS. You can plot the integral form of the population formula to show population growth as a function of time.
@InnocentLittleBoy Using integration, you'll see that the Population formula will produce a graphic that will go up & down like a snake moving in sand if we assign the X-axis a function of TIME (t) and not an "unrestricted" growth like you wrongly visualize. The population formula when used OUT of integration looks like an "unrestricted" graph that only goes up or down because you are really looking at a SPECIFIC segment or ZOOMING into a small segment of the whole range of values through TIME.
@ILBoy I used an average of "r" for all "r's" which are part of the time interval from Noah's times to the present & produced a result similar to the present population of the planet. Although I didn't use INTEGRATION for the formula, by using average "r " for the past 4358 years, what the formula does is averaging the graphed upside and downside curves obtained out of the INTEGRATION process. If we ZOOM a segment for both plotted graphs for the year 2010, the result should be fairly similar.
@MoooHamMad Don't forget, r must remain constant, which can only work during short intervals of time, when a population isn't at carrying capacity nor is it extinct. The case you presented conveniently worked, but what if in the future the population grew so large that the death rate grew massively larger than the birth rate, such that r when averaged out became negative? Would you still hold firm your belief that the flood was possible simply because a formula conveniently worked for you?
@InnocentLittleBoy You say "r must remain constant". Mister ILB, "r" is not a constant but a variable. Don't you understand the difference between a constant and a variable? Those are basic math concepts. I'm starting to lose my cool and my patience with you. Your argument is basically this==> If tomorrow WWIII begins and in one year we are reduced to just ONLY 8 people alive in the whole planet, will the population formula give me results compatible with that real-time circumstance? Answer:YES
@InnocentLittleBoy If in one year WWIII begins and we are reduced to 8 people again, the value of "r" will be very close to 0. Then, when you average all "r"s since the time of Noah to the time when WWIII reduced population to 8, the last value of "r" is so strong that it will force the average value of "r" to inevitably be almost 0. Then, when you calculate Population with the formula, the result will be basically 8 because results are real-time.
@InnocentLittleBoy The reason the formula gave me a result of almost 6 billion people counting from the time of Noah to the present is because the actual value of "r" doesn't reflect a catastrophic event in history that would give me other result than 6 billion people approximately. The average value of "r" is affected by past values of "r" of course. WWII reduced the population the past 20th century & it affected the average value of "r". If not, the 6 billion result would have been greater.
@InnocentLittleBoy You can easily put what I say to the test by not using the value of "r" for the 20th century when calculating the average value of "r" for the past 4358 years and you will see how the result for Population is going to be much more greater than 6 billion people. Go ahead and try it and then come to me with the results. If tomorrow we are reduced to 8 people, average "r" will be almost 0 and population will be around 8. Try the formula using "r"= 0.00001 and see for yourself.
You were doing fine in the first one. Why stoop to the same sarcastic "better then though" attitude the atheist demonstrate? I think the real atheists that think for them selves will continue to search for truth and find that Evolution is very flaw'd.. Abiogenesis is a good start but misses the point and that God IS NATURAL and super natural.
@coos678 said:"Abiogenesis and Evolution arent the same theory "
yeah and we know why evolutuionists won't go there too. Louis Pasteur proved life can not come from non life. So their must of been some kind of life giver, creator, designer, I.E.; GOD
I'm a christian and I loved this video. It was hilarious. I'm going to send it to my atheist friend. He'll probably laugh even harder then I did. Of course, I'll send him part 1 first. 'the lord god darwin...' rofl and his only begotten son richard dawkins - stop!!! please stop!!! ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wow, please say you're joking. The 3rd school of thought: you merely have to replace "the lord god Darwin" with "God". Gospel book being the bible which had some nice similarities. And I'm being really serious here, it all fits quite snugly.
Religious people who have done wrong no longer have to feel guilty because they can repent.
Though you'd have to replace the black void with being placed in either of two unreal places, "school shootings" with wars and abortions with untrue godly requests.
Are you kidding me? No, if the your so called beta aliens had any knowledge of evolution, and tools to check not only fossilize remains but also to extract dna and analyze information from it, as we can then they would know that alfa aliens could not in any way come from this world ape descendants.
Please produce evidence for earth being less then 10 000 year old... I would love to hear them...
You'd think that the Beta aliens, being intelligent enough to master interstellar travel, would realise the gorilla fossils share no morphological similarities with the Alphas, and that the Alphas did not evolve from gorillas.
Silliness. They're science and undestanding of science would exceed yours by orders of magnitude. And alien DNA would be different. Your notions are so silly, I, too got quite a laugh. And my IQ is 180, so calling me retarded is also silly. Thanks for the laugh.
wow...just wow....the first installment was already hurting to the eyes, but this crapfest of ignorant, nonsensical, uniformed, idiotic, retarded false statements, deluded opinions, misrepresentations and cognitive failures really deserves an award in the most Epic Phail YT video category.
"I'm a Christian that loves Freedom of Speech so much that I will defend Atheists' right to believe that they are apes." it's not atheists who define us as apes, its the scientific community which atheists tend to agree with, it the scientific community one day comes out with " we're not apes and there is a god (who just happens to be the Christian one)" and they provide the evidence for it, then atheists will become believers.
Proof that evolution is a lie from the devil: my grandfather wasn't a monkey. maybe yours was, but i doubt it, enjoy burning in agony for all of eternity, heathens.
" enjoy burning in agony for all of eternity, heathens." that's very Christian of you. . .
its always the same with you people, constantly ignore every point made then resort to the hell threat. . . do not understand how ridiculous hell is as a concept ?
manhunt48, he's not a Christian. donotfeedthetroll is an Atheist and he always does this all over YouTube because it's funny as hell for him to ridicule Christians. It's like a parody for him.
But what I find really funny is how Atheists like him fool other Atheists like you. He must be laughing at your inability to recognize or discern his sarcasm and I laugh at you for being so quick to judge all Christians. It shows how bigoted and full of hatred you really are. Ha, ha, ha!
"But what I find really funny is how Atheists like him fool other Atheists like you. " Yes well its rather hard to tell who's taking the pee & who's being serious sometimes. I should of called poe's law.
"I laugh at you for being so quick to judge all Christians" Laugh away, i only spoke from experience.
"It shows how bigoted and full of hatred you really are" Really, how so? i'm a bigot & full of hate because i've had countless theists do that to me?
manhunt48 response part 1: I'm a Christian and I agree, well mostly. I look at youtube and other sites and everyone that's supposedly a "Christian" is using the same filthy language as everyone one else. The whole idea of being a Christian is to be Christ-like. Most people on youtube who claim to be a Christian definitly don't fit this criteria. Not to say "they aren't good enough, you must be perfect" It's just that it's not setting a good example for other Christ-followers.
"I laugh at you for being so quick to judge all Christians."
I laugh, and then cry, that he is indistinguishable from real YECs.
It's a sorry state when a person comes to the realisation that YECs are actually serious when they say the Earth is 6000 years old :( It breaks my heart that people that dumb actually exist... I guess it's a good thing that they're a minority on the decline, and will eventually be crushed :)
NoeLPZC: "It breaks my heart that people that dumb actually exist... I guess it's a good thing that they're a minority on the decline, and will eventually be crushed"
MoooHamMad: I'm going to show you why you are a religious Atheist, a true zealot. First of all what is this CRUSHING statement? In science, you don't crush anyone, you share ideas and test them and establish parameters for further testing.
2. By you talking about "minorities" that will be "crushed" you've proved that Atheists don't care about science but care more about forcing pseudo-theories that seem to go hand in hand with your atheo-naturalistic and atheo-humanistic beliefs. You're more religious than I am or will ever be. You are truly a religious nut. Second of all, when you say "it breaks my hearts", it sounds like you now pretend to have feelings when your Atheistic faith doesn't allow you to have "feelings".
3. Like your Messiah Dawkins said: "we cant get ethics from science, and there is no justice or design or purpose (no evil or good)DNA doesnt know or caresit is just there". You cannot possibly feel anything in your Atheistic world. Your life is meaningless, listen to your Messiah Dawkins and dont disobey his majestic authority. Read his Gospel, The God Delusion and let your internal no-purpose-at all chemical reactions be soaked in its words and let your internal ape shine in glory.
4. Earth in fact is 6,000 years old and not more than 10,000. Non-manipulated and unbiased pure science points to this fact. The billions of years old myth is just that, a myth. Browse and read my comments on the first part of these series to understand why I say so. Science has been hijacked by a bunch of Atheists that have tried hard to perpetuate a 19th century hoax.
5. The lie has been perfected but history proves the many times deceit, lies, and hoaxes have been introduced in the Evolution faith to convince people, and sometimes it takes decades to discover such hoaxes as was the case of the Piltdown man. Now a new myth is being pushed down our throats again, THE IDA HOAX. A fossil that is nothing more than a freaking ancient lemur and hidden by someone for 2 years, and magically announced as the missing link & all that without passing through peer-review.
6. Your evolutions hoax is the "Greek Myth" of our times and it will get worse as the socialist-communist school system in this socialist non-democratic oligarchy we call USA continues to spread more poison across the land and reaching its hairy ape hand into Europe, and deceiving more and more people of this generation and all those that follow into believing more myths, sold under the label of "science".
7. Christians are the True Scientists; they have developed many theories that are still in use today and are the basics of science. This modern world of science and technology we enjoy today is all thanks to Christians, not Atheists. We proudly remember many of our geniuses such as Sir Isaac Newton and many, many more. Science triumphed under their intellects because they weren't manipulated or risked losing their licenses when ideas and theories were produced in their brilliant minds.
8. In those times there were no Atheists controlling peer-reviewing and hindering Christians from developing scientific ideas. Atheists have hijacked science and now, science is stagnant, unable to flourish. Any theory that would pose a risk to evolution's authenticity is doomed to fail, not because each new theory has no merit but rather because Atheists that hijacked science will not allow anything to risk their only myth-theory that justifies their Atheistic religion: the myth of evolution.
6. Wait, wait, you're calling a democratic society communist and then telling them they're stupid?
7. People like Sir Isaac were religious because it was basically the law to be so then. I seem to remember religion calling Science a heresy, holding us back for about 800 years? Hell, Galileo was prosecuted, possibly killed (No-one is really sure), because he proved the Earth is orbiting the Sun and religion didn't agree.
SgtLion: "People like Sir Isaac were religious because it was basically the law to be so then."
MoooHamMad: Oh really, was that the reason then? So, you put into question his faith in Christianity and you assume he was trying to go with the flow and all that based on what evidence? Hmmm, that explains why he developed his own thesis analyzing all Biblical prophecies using the scientific method & named it 'Universe Cryptogram'. No one put a gun to his head to do so. You really have no point...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wow, eight comments dedicated to a single word??? That's fucking HILARIOUS!!!!
I'm gunna PM you with my response rather write a thousand comments... but man, THANK YOU for the laugh! XD I know trying to have a meaningful discussion with you will be pointless, but this is too funny to refuse...
When the "beta" aliens find the alpha alien and gorilla fossils, would they be able to find any DNA? If so, they could tell pretty quickly if they evolved from a common ancestor (not one into the other like you say, that's not how evolution works).
jgoemat: "would they be able to find any DNA? If so, they could tell pretty quickly if they evolved from a common ancestor"
MoooHamMad: Let me mention all the wrong assumptions & statements of your comment. 1st of all, I mentioned in the video a common ancestor which is justified by the time span that separates the period in which humans & gorillas lived & the time when the alpha aliens lived. Because they aren't placed during the same period of time,gorillas indeed can be assumed as ancestors.
MoooHamMad: I know exactly how the evolution hoax works but you simply didn't pay attention to the video's details as I already explained in my previous comment.
You claim that by analyzing the DNA, Beta aliens would instantly know the truth of alpha aliens' origins but there's a problem with that: evidence's value is directly related to its interpretation and the level of technology available to the scientist.
Your argument is based on your wish that beta aliens would use an interpretation of evidence similar to that of "evolutionists". Even in today's society, scientists disagree in their interpretation of DNA evidence to prove ancient common ancestry. Scientists that follow I.D. theory don't see evidence with the same eyes of "evolutionists". What if the Beta aliens have come to the scientific realization that there is indeed an Intelligent Designer behind life?
Why do you assume that being more technologically advanced means being more Atheistic & naturalistic in one's approach? And to be fair, I included in the video the possibility that even among aliens, a few "schools" of thought can emerge in a society they build here on Earth with respect to its origins.
What if the future of science & the scientific nirvana is achieved once we humans come to the full knowledge & realization that there was indeed a Creator that brought everything into existence?
"There was a time when religion ruled the world. It is known as The Dark Ages."
-Ruth Hurmence Green
The greeks calculated that the Earth was a sphere and the diameter to within a few percent by observing shadows. Religion taught that the earth was flat and the center of the universe through the dark ages, then they imprisoned Galileo for life for the crime of revealing truth.
Spitting out vacant ideas that contradict evidence is not the way to truth or enlightenment.
jgoemat: "The greeks calculated that the Earth was a sphere and the diameter to within a few percent by observing shadows. Religion taught that the earth was flat and the center of the universe through the dark ages"
MoooHamMad: Religion taught that the Earth is flat? What religion is that? Certainly not Christianity. The Bible uses the Hebrew word CHUWG to describe the Earth. CHUWG means roundness. Bible describes Earth's atmosphere as a dome that covers Earth.
If the author thought Earth was flat, why cover it with a dome-like "roof" and not use a flat one? Because we know that domes are round, the verses that mention that refer to a round Earth (again) just as Isaiah proposes. Job describes Earth as hanging on nothing in space and thus, going against all general knowledge of its time that claimed that Earth rested on pillars. Job is one of the oldest books not only of Bible but of human history.
Job also describes Earth's spinning on its own axis by comparing it with the mechanism used by artisans producing Earthenware by using their gyratory machines. Job is the same author that describes the behemoth creature co-existing with humans. The description is completely similar to that of a brachiosaurus.
In NT it says that Jesus will return when it's still daytime for some people & night for others. The verses imply a round Earth that receives sun light on one half of it at any given time.
Just because a freaking stupid Pope of the dark ages didn't understand those concepts of Bible & decided to persecute people just because he was too idiotic to understand what Bible intended to show, doesn't mean that religion is the exact opposite of science. In fact, by merely analyzing history, anyone can learn that basically all scientific theories we use today were discovered and developed by Christians, not Atheists. I can easily show you a few examples of that in case you dare to deny it.
And this dome supposedly had holes in it to let rain water through. Seriously have you seen it raining through any gaps in the sky? If you see any could you please plug them up with something because i dont want them to ruin my holiday. thanks in advance :P
If aliens couldn't find fossils of humans, then they wouldn't be looking hard enough. You need more than a thousand years for complete fossilisation to take place, this is why fossils only form in certain places because you need the right conditions.
01101100d 1 month ago
Let's say this is what we find on the earth>>
In the bottom layer of rock are shell fossils,
above that is a layer with shells and fish fossils,
above that is a layer with shells, fish and amphibians fossils,
above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian and reptile fossils,
above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian, reptile fossils
and dinosaur fossils.
No human or bunny fossils are found in any of these layers.
No dating method used
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz ....Shell fossils found on TOP layer of Mount Everest. No human or bunny fossils found in that layer. Hmmm...humans never existed! Laughable logic! Layer order or significance is another myth integrated into the Evolution hoax to further the agenda. No part of the world shows a consistent layer order like those found in geology books. The reason is because those layers formed during the flood. And again, don't EVER forget shell fossils on top of Mount Everest are ALL closed.
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad The top of Mt. Everest is made of an old sea bed thousands of feet thick, pushed up by plate tectonic forces over millions of years.
The Geologic Column in the text books is a TIME SCALE not the layers of dirt we really find in nature. Why can't creatards figure that out?
And not all sedimentry layers are from water, not all layers are mud, there was no flood.
The fossils are sorted, you can't explain that.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Nice googling but sadly you simply parrot what others tell you, not putting any thought or logic in what you read. If you understood the works of plate tectonics and the forces involved, you would understand why it is impossible to find intact shells in the closed position. First of all, the concept of layers tilting up/down one over the other is called thrust faulting which is partial and we also have overthrust faulting. This is completely theoretical but plausible.
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@gregrutz You must be unbelievably ignorant of physics to not understand how impossible it would be in a mechanical analysis using formulas, physics & civil engineering for that to happen in a grand scale. If it theoretically formed the Everest, the HUGE amount of hundreds of thousands of tons of pressure involved in this layer tilting during millions of years would simply CRUSH ALL shells found in dry land. I see you like an extremely delusional Atheist; I truly feel sorry for you.
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad I am not an atheist, creatard.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad You are right, I don't know why ''closed'' shell mean anything. They live underground, how are they going to open when they die.
And how did an old sea bed get made into a mountain? There are no shells ''on top'' of the mountain, the whole top of the mountain is limestone, shells a thousand feet thick.
gregrutz 2 months ago
Wow, take a class in Logic. Scientists have found many transitional fossils.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Scientists found nothing more than arguments that fall NOT beyond the realm of speculation. They've found many fossils of animals that are no longer in existence. Then they build a myth around it that fits their Evolution beliefs and sell it to the public. They take advantage of our secular societies that happily accept anything that doesn't promote any kind of god, even if the theory in itself is false. Anyone with enough imagination can attach a storyline to these fossils.
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad There is something called MATH. When you have a range of years (millions) that span between the existence of a species that are linked "theoretically" to another species, you have burdened yourself with the need for extraordinary evidence. According to math and probability, when you have hundreds of millions of years of Evolution, you are expected to find "AT LEAST" millions of transitional fossils to prove the theory and NOT ONLY 10, 100 or even 1000. Evolution is MYTH!
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad Correct, most of the fossils are transitional fossils, very few of them [living fossis] survived. They are all extinct. 99% of them.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz You or any other "Evolutionist" saying things like "most of the fossils are transitional fossils" is no more valid than me or any other "non-Evolutionist" saying things like "most of the fossils are independent fossils, not related to each other". There's no physical way to prove your claim or mine. All we can do is attach vain imaginations, myths, legends and speculation to "the facts". Until you learn this reality, you will continue to dwell into the depths of Greek myths.
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad How do you know, you have never studied science or looked at the fossils. Being uneducated is not evidence.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad Science does not comment on the supernatural. The theory explains the facts, the fossils are the facts. Dinosaurs changed over three major time periods, how do you explain the facts?
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz The fossils are the facts....the facts of what? Just because Evolution makes use of that evidence ("or facts" as you call it) to build on the myth doesn't grant the theory veracity. Collected data or fossils proves nothing. Those are just dead animals, nothing more. Attaching myths like Evolution and claiming "this dinosaur eventually transformed into this one you see here or there" proves nothing but mere conjecture. Facts don't need to be explained, myths do!
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad ''Facts [like dinosarus ruling the world] don't need to be explained, myths do!'' No myths need to be dismissed. You have lost touch with reality. seek help
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz "No myths need to be dismissed. You have lost touch with reality. seek help"
Mooo: Apparently the one that has lost touch with reality is you & the rest of "Evolutionists" because you have embraced a myth that was placed under the shadow of science and yet you refuse to dismiss it. Fantastic claims of species that transform into other species during millions of years without an iota of evidence except speculation attached to fossils is no more realistic than your next myth.
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad You are to stupid to see the evidence.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Oh, nice ad-hominem attack, hmmmm! Let me throw in my own=> Baboon, let me paraphrase what you said in its correct form: "You are too stupid to see the evidence THE WAY WE WANT TO PRESENT IT TO YOU". That's what you really meant. No thank you, I don't believe in Greek myths.
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MoooHamMad Calling evolution a Greek myth is as stupid as calling it a religion. It is science, something you don't understand.
Have you ever read a geology book? No.
''without an iota of evidence except speculation attached to fossils ''
Fossils are facts dummy. You can't explain them.
gregrutz 2 months ago
And btw atheists killed 300 million people? Russia and china killed in the name of communism not in the name of atheism. For god sake (its an expression, i can use it) read a objective book from time to time
alliencedful 2 months ago
@alliencedful Ok, here you have an objective reading from a quote made by the Russian Founder of the Russian Communist Party, Vladimir Lenin, one of the greatest Communist leaders of the past century: "OUR PROGRAM NECESSARILY INCLUDES THE PROPAGANDA OF ATHEISM" ...and a century later, 300 million people killed by Communists around the world. They implemented the use of Atheist propaganda successfully for years which explains why they savagely attacked Christians, Jews, etc. Ouch!
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad It's hilarious how you conveniently use russia and china as examples (and half assed ones at that, my previous comment stands, as lenin is not the end all and be all of communism, see maoism stalinism)) While first of all, not even near 300 million were killed, and you don't reply to my comment where i show that religion is the cause of much more death throughout the ages of time. As a matter of fact i wouldn't be surprised if religion was the cause of the very first war.
alliencedful 2 months ago
@alliencedful Why do you need God when you have an all-powerful, all-knowing, and caring deity like Stalin or Kim Jong Ill to look up to? Dictatorships are either atheist or have complete control over religion. They can't have someone above the leader that people look up to.
cdoftx 2 months ago
@cdoftx Dictatorships were the norm in history, and they were religious. So i don't know what you're trying to say here. These dictators claimed to be the chosen representative of god, there were a lot more religious dictators as there were atheist dictators. Btw all dictators are pieces of shit, and to use the argument atheism leads to a dictatorial regime is not only factually incorrect it's also insulting and shows the sophistic way of reasoning among religious people.
alliencedful 2 months ago
@alliencedful I agree with everything you say. I'm just saying that people miss the point when they try to link another's beliefs with tyranny. Any belief can produce a dictatorship, all it takes is the suppression of other beliefs.
cdoftx 2 months ago
@cdoftx You said: "Any belief can produce a dictatorship, all it takes is the suppression of other beliefs"
Mooo: As in Vladimir Lenin saying: "OUR PROGRAM NECESSARILY INCLUDES THE PROPAGANDA OF ATHEISM", then Communism takes over and eventually a massive global genocide against believers, especially Christians, is perpetrated to suppress their faith in order to increase the Communist agenda that "NECESSARILY INCLUDES THE PROPAGANDA OF ATHEISM"? ...the Atheist belief... the religion...
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad Yes, by belief I mean religious belief. Dictators can't have anyone above them, and want people to look to them as their highest authority on everything. Lenin and Mao had atheism. Iran and Saudi Arabia have Shia and Sunni Islam, respectively. In England, the King is still head of the church, and it used to be just as brutal to people with different beliefs a few hundred years ago. Anyways, Lenin did need atheism. There was already a church and it wasn't in his pocket.
cdoftx 2 months ago
how manny people has religion killed; all deaths by aids because of the pope telling people not to use condoms, the crusades, christians started ww2 (nazis were christians), the inquisition, the manny wars in europe in medieval times, the pope was often involved. the conflict between ireland and england, the conflicts in israel, the many wars in africa, the islamic conquests etc. on top of that basicly all pre modern time wars had a religious component to it. colonising in the name of god. etc
alliencedful 2 months ago
the difference between the alien bullshit and real life is that we haven't found 2 species but a buttload of them. It's been suggested that 99.9% of all species to have ever lived are extinct. So that gives science a huge database to do research on and to confirm that species have evolved, and gives you a bunch of retarded arguments that hold up to gullible uneducated uninformed people who do not care about real life but prefer a fantasy in where they are the chosen species of god. Get real.
alliencedful 2 months ago
All your agrument here does is imply that human beings came from another planet.
KyleAndDougsRandomTV 5 months ago
@KyleAndDougsRandomTV Completely incorrect. I never implied, said, or suggested such idea in this video. So, watch again and again until you understand the message this video is trying to present.
MoooHamMad 5 months ago
@MoooHamMad No, what I mean is, your agrument in this video in no way presented any kind of evidence against evolution. All you did was give scenerio where aliens find the remains of another race of aliens, and not knowing any better, assumed they were from Earth.
This doesn't help your argument at all. It's unnecessary, and wastes alot of time.
KyleAndDougsRandomTV 5 months ago
@KyleAndDougsRandomTV You are almost there. Watch it AGAIN! The video is trying to present the viewer certain logic taking an alien scenario as an example to show that the same logic could be applied to Evolution. The same way some individuals of the Beta aliens assumed the Alpha aliens could be originally from planet Earth (when in fact they were not), the same mistakes can be made with the assumptions involved with the theory of Evolution and that all its claims could be in fact WRONG.
MoooHamMad 5 months ago
@MoooHamMad
"...and that all its claims could be in fact WRONG."
Well, I admire that you used the word "Could" instead of "Are". I'm glad that you're actually being honest and reasonable with your argument, rather than just insisting that you are right (Which is what most creationists seem to do).
But catagorizing fossils isn't really based on assumptions. The newly discovered remains are always studied closely so that the species can be properly classified.
KyleAndDougsRandomTV 5 months ago
wow you really have no idea what evolution is. That is so sad.
SuperMrAtheist 6 months ago
i don't know why i watch this stuff. more and more the people that produce this type of self-inflicted forced ignorance convinve me that this planet would be better without us.
greatbigfluffybunny 6 months ago
What.... The.... Fuck.....?
What's even more rediculous is that this video is classified under "Science and Technology" when it is clearly meant to be funny.
KyleAndDougsRandomTV 6 months ago
Dinosaurs were also a big hoax so Zionist media producers such as Steven Spielberg could make the Jurassic Park series and con millions of dollars from the worlds public and send it to Israel to fund jihad against Palestine.
MrBrational 7 months ago
u believers of god are a bunch of morons, u cannot prove to me ever, without the me seeing this faggot looking god, and no god isnt the most powerful being bitch, i am. i decide my fate not some peeping tom who u think watches us. jesus is just as fake, he can lck my dick, jesus and the bible are like hitler, a bunch of shennanigons, are a bunch of terrorist who can be linked to alkida. douchebags
OHS73 9 months ago
Go Beta aliens LOL
hellavadeal 1 year ago
Very funny.
edamb1 1 year ago
Haha. This was the stupidest thing I've ever watched. Cheers for the laugh!
xxxzeroxxx111 1 year ago
Sweet can you also explain how continental drift is a hoax? Or the threory of sexual reproduction is is just a hoax, I like the stork hypothesis better. Also I love your name MooHamMad, did you get your name after the toy stuffed cow they have on the Atheist Experience tv show?
bullwhipjesus 1 year ago
TheDarkLordLucifer 1 year ago
@TheDarkLordLucifer Redneck Satan is just as made up as zombie jesus.
bullwhipjesus 1 year ago
@bullwhipjesus And as made up as your myth of dinosaurs that magically transform into chickens, reptiles that magically transform into apes that Atheists LOVE to call "Lucy" and the millions of imaginary transitional fossils that only exists in your Atheistic deluded minds...
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@TheDarkLordLucifer And when Jesus returns you will burn for eternity along with your god. Why would you choose destruction when you already have God's love? Just repent..
I mean do you honestly believe that Satan could win against God??? God being the most powerful being EVER?? The creator of the universe?? The creator of Lucifer?? LOL dude.
reallycoolman2003 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TheDarkLordLucifer 1 year ago
euhm,I hope that you know that all of the wars in history and many today,are all caused by religion or religious people,mister " I'm an O SO GOOD CHRISTIAN" mmmh?! I know many things and spent reading many hours in the Bible,and I realised that It's full of contradictions . I don't believe anything(nor from religion nor some scientific theories) ,because I think we simply do not know.The only thing I fully believe in are facts, it's maybe shallow,I now,but it's all I have.
lionkingwestend 1 year ago
LOGIC, needs LOGIC.
gregrutz 1 year ago
wake up mr, your a liar, your a fool, read a book beyond the cheap philosophy of christianity.
TheOnetrueself 1 year ago
ay, you are a dick, buddy
TheOnetrueself 1 year ago
you don't understand evolution, damn dumb christians
TheOnetrueself 1 year ago
@TheOnetrueself said:"you don't understand evolutiondamn dumb christians"
Typical response from our public school brainwashed darwits. Hey JACK ASS! WHY don't YOU explain it me! I'd love to hear it for the billionth time since it is a different "story" about every six months these days even the theory evolves but only to fit the new theory since the last 5 or six re-vamps have all been debunked. Not even the Darwits themselves can come to a consensus anymore. So go ahead shit for brains
Ultramediacorp 1 year ago
@Ultramediacorp at least theory, or should i say theories, or evolution are developing, and just because its not perfect does not mean bin the whole lot like an angry child in art class, its another thing to say because there's gaps then it must be magic, so god came down and made up evolution to piss you off,
god is a lie, creation by beings beyond earth, maybe god was an alien race,
maybe they were the angels, demons, and god you so cling to.
TheOnetrueself 1 year ago
@TheOnetrueself Is that all you fuckin jerks know how to say is "God did it" Duh as if ANYONE says that, No Google the phrase and the only people saying that are atheists because they simply can't have a dialogue without being the pricks and assholes of the internet and THAT is why they are the most distrusted segment of society
Ultramediacorp 1 year ago
@Ultramediacorp
get out of your dog collar and stop preaching bullcrap.
this crap is not worth even talking about,
if you wanted proof you'd get it, but you don't,
its all because you don't understand it,
there are many differing area's of evolutionary research on not all of them are wrong and when mistakes were made they changed it to fit fact.
where as religion only changes to keep some sad brainwashed followers,
creationists know very little of real science,
do research the facts please
TheOnetrueself 1 year ago
Thanks for the good laugh! Very funny. ... It is satire, isn't it? Nobody could actually be that stupid and ignorant ... could they?
AThagoras 1 year ago
Atheists are now petitioning for the right for consenting adults to have incestuous intercourse. Abortion is okay since children don't have rights, and as we speak the pedophile rights groups will be petitioning for "equality" as long as the child "consents" (just give candy or money and they'll be happy). Sick people.
stephe1987 1 year ago
Really that last bit with the orgies and the drugs was priceless. Almost though you had a really argument
coos678 1 year ago
You're comparing aliens and gorillas together as an evolutionary possibility to early humans and bipeds? Well, bipeds have indisputable similarities to humans, and also: EARLY HUMANS DID NOT HAVE SPACE TRAVEL, IDIOT! Carbon dating much, moron? comparing evolution to the idiotic creationists? thats low. And Atheists are ugly and Christians are pretty? That is generalizing and stupid. GET OFF THE TUBES!
Bunnybeast1 1 year ago
this is stupid, evolution makes alot more sense than religion
InnocentLittleBoy 2 years ago
@InnocentLittleBoy said:"this is stupid, evolution makes alot more sense than religion "
yeah but only if you have an axe to grind and hate god for what ever the reason is, it doesn't matter really. No one really believes atheists don't know God exists. They just keep trying to prove it to themselves on places like youtube while they make fun of Christians the only thing they apparently have to do in their pathetic Godless existence
Ultramediacorp 1 year ago
@Ultramediacorp you're so blind that its sad to say the least. Since all you cling to is your bible, then why don't we have a closer look at it? How is it that 2 humans can create the whole human race without such titanic issues as INBREEDING DEPRESSION? Then how do only 8 people do it AGAIN after God floods the world? According to knowledge we've acquired IN MODERN TIMES, this is flat out impossible. Please stick to your blind belief, there are those of us who listen to evidence and reason.
InnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy Hey ya stupid little piss ant, if evolution is true, inbreeding is just as likely to happen. If two people can't start the human races, how the hell did a we start from nothing? You don't have an answer but I do. LIFE doesn't start from non life. so How did it start then? Remember YOU went this way, I didn't
Ultramediacorp 1 year ago
@Ultramediacorp Dumbass. Evolution happens through a population; one that preceded humans. Not 2 mythical figures who never existed. And answer the Question as to how old the Earth is. Explain how a man can be swallowed by a whale and not die instantly. ANSWER MY PREVIOUS QUESTIONS WITH SCIENCE AND REASONING. DON'T CHANGE THE SUBJECT. Or admit that the Bible is history's greatest hoax. STUPID CHRISTIAN. STOP DENYING HOW FAKE THE BIBLE IS. GO BACK TO YOUR WITCH BURNINGS AND CRUSADES NUMB NUTS
InnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
@Ultramediacorp And for your information, Evolution has been witnessed at the microscopic level multiple times. The annual flu season is proof that evolution exists. The evidence of evolution is all around you, unlike evidence for your fake religion. You'd know that if you made it past grade 8 you redneck hillbilly hick. Science has won this debate, so either wake up and live on Earth or stay in your pedophile ridden church and let society go on. I challenge you to answer even 1 of my questions
InnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy You said this: "Then how do only 8 people do it AGAIN after God floods the world?" to put into doubt the Flood and make claims that 8 people cannot re-populate the Earth to produce the 6 billion we have today. But I'm going to intellectually rape you here with logic and math. Numbers don't lie. Math in all its forms is the purest form of truth.
---
Let's start here with the formula for population,
N(sub t)=N(sub 0) * (e^(r * t))
---
Next I'll explain what are the variables
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
Now, "N(sub t)" is the future population you intend to calculate. "N(sub 0)" is the original population of the situation under study. "e" is a constant that equals 2.71828. "r" is the growth rate which varies depending on 2 rates. The rate of death calculated by the number of deaths caused by wars, famine, suicides, and natural deaths; and the rate of birth. Both rates define what "r" is. Each country has had different values of "r". At last we have "t" which is the number of years that passed.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
Now we will define the variables,
-
N(sub 0)= 8 (Noah and his wife, 3 sons, and their 3 respective wives)
-
e= 2.71828 (a constant, it never changes)
-
r= 0.47% =0.0047 (there are charts and studies that reveal these values per year and decades, so we have to use an average value to simplify this, though we can re-use the formula for each year or decade but the work would be immense)
-
t= 4358 years (today is 2010 AD and the Noah's flood happened in 2348 BC; so 2348+2010 equals 4358 years)
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@MoooHamMad You had time to type all that. Congratulations.
Your math is good, theres no question about that. But you see, math tends to ignore certain facts. There are a few significant problems with the exponential growth population model, which you have just used.
First of all, what if the initial 8 population members had all been males? Would the math pick up on that?
Second, this model assumes that the population has unlimited resources and unlimited space.
InnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
@MoooHamMad The problem is that populations rarely have either. As the population grows, there will be fewer resources to go around, which usually results in higher death. Also, overcrowding does tend to attract predators. Not to mention that diseases are spread around easier in these situations. You get the point.
InnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
@MoooHamMad Lets put things back into context. This model is usually accurate only for short periods of time, because over time, r just goes in all directions and must be averaged out, therefore it becomes less and less reliable as time goes by. And scientists only rely on this formula to predict the populations of invasive species, since they can usually outcompete other animals for both resources and space. That should say something in itself.
InnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
@MoooHamMad So congratulations. By using a simple yet unrealistic population growth model, you indeed proved that by numbers alone, the flood was possible.
InnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy The population formula isn't unrealistic. It was developed by mathematicians by analyzing "real-life" data. It's used in universities in calculus classes and in real life by experts. You are the only "unrealistic" fool here. "r" already takes into account the factors that you mentioned like deaths, births, and environmental issues that may affect their outcome.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
Values of "r" are published periodically and you can re-calculate the formula multiple times for more accuracy by using for example "r" for each 10 years but you would have to calculate 435 times and then add the results. Results will be basically the same since I obtained "r" by using the average of many values of "r" that range from Noah's times to the present.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
So sad that you have to go so low as to pathetically deny a formula that has been accepted globally by experts to calculate population just because it shattered all your Atheistic illusions and proved your pre-conceived delusions wrong. Being an Atheist is so delusional... But well, you religious Atheist nuts are too deep into your cult to even realize the outcome of your own stupidity.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@MoooHamMad Yes it is used by experts, but with precaution, because this model always assumes unrestricted growth which is impossible. If you took a real calculus class, you would know that in a situation with a negative r value, the population would grow infinitely small, but never actually go to 0. Does that make sense? to have 0.00000000000001 members of a population?
InnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy You say "If you took a real calculus class". Ermm, yes I did given the fact that I'm a civil engineer. I took pre-calculus I and II, Calculus I, II and III, Differential equations, and Mathematical Methods. Add to that Statistics for Engineers, Complex Matrices, plus many dozens of Engineering classes that use math to work.
-
The value of "r" can never be negative since it is a proportion between rates of deaths and births and can be no less than 0. Why don't you know that?
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy You say "this model always assumes unrestricted growth which is impossible". Do you know what "average" means? When you take an average of values and use it to represent a global result, such value isn't necessarily located at the middle of the graph representing the model under study. The average is influenced by the "weight" of individual values. If you knew how statistics work, you would know what I'm talking about but you obviously don't.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy Using an average value for a variable in a formula usually produces results that are similar to the sum of individual results of multiple instances of the same formula representing "segments" of the case under study. Because this formula is designed to produce real-time results, if just ONE sudden change in population growth is strong enough to affect hundreds of OTHER values of "r", such strong sudden change in "r" value will be reflected on the result obtained.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@MoooHamMad In a ww3 scenario, nuclear weapons would probably be used. Even with 8 people left, the human race would be doomed. The Earth would be uninhabitable due to the sheer amount of radiation present, and the lack of agricultural systems. And what are the chances that those 8 people would be within even miles of eachother? Let alone have the skills to survive? Math can only take you so far my friend, there comes a time and place for reality.
InnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
@MoooHamMad By the way, please offer some math with respect to your video. What are the chances of an alien civilization finding Earth and coming here AFTER we die off and before our Sun burns out and Earth collapses? Don't forget, Alpha Centauri is more than 4 light years away, and its our closest neighbor. What are the chances of THAT alien race dying off, and ANOTHER alien race finding Earth and coming here, before our Sun burns out and collapses? And did God create aliens as well?
InnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
@MoooHamMad And we're talking about an average which is affected by times when people were clearly interested in keeping records of birth and death rates. You still don't get the point, this model assumes UNRESTRICTED GROWTH. No matter what the r value is, it assumes UNRESTRICTED GROWTH. And yes, r IS a constant. I can see you deleted that post, did you realize you were wrong?
InnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy Once again with the claim that "r" is a constant. Jesus Christ, I hope you're not representative of all Atheists because your ignorance would make them all look very bad.
-
What part of the concept of CONSTANT and VARIABLE you don't understand in the field of mathematics? Go to a freaking college math professor and ask him if "r" in the Population formula is a constant or a variable. What amazes me is how you irrationally refuse to accept that someone corrects you. WOW!
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy This is going to be the last time I correct you and I don't want to you to spread any more of your ignorance in here.
-
A CONSTANT is a term used in formulas which value never changes no matter what situation is being analyzed by the formula at hand. In the case of Population, THE ONLY CONSTANT is "e" which is equal to 2.71828. All other symbols are VARIABLES which are values that may vary depending on the analysis being made. THIS IS INDISPUTABLE. Anything else is IGNORANCE.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy With respect to your other ignorant argument about the model of Population being a model that assumes UNRESTRICTED GROWTH, don't you understand that a variable such as "r" that takes into consideration birth rates, death rates, famines, wars, genocide, diseases, social quality, medical field improvement, etc, is hardly "UNRESTRICTED"? "r" is also called "The Rate of Natural Increase". For example, in Sweden, 2007, "r" was 0.2% but in Sri Lanka, 2007, it was 1.3% Why?
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy Because variables are affected by the factors they involve. In 2007, Sri Lanka had a population growth rate greater than that of Sweden for the same year because the factors involved were far more significant than those factors affecting Sweden. The population formula can be used in Calculus III to take into account input changes for its variables, including "r". When you integrate in Calculus (known as INTEGRATION), you specify a RANGE OF VALUES that affect the final result.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy Integration takes into consideration a range of values that when plotted as a graphic, allows you to see how its value changes with respect to the variable time or compared against any other variable. Do you know what a GRAPHIC CALCULATOR is? It is a calculator with the capabilities to plot a graphic that visually represents an INTEGRAL FORMULA and DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS. You can plot the integral form of the population formula to show population growth as a function of time.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy Using integration, you'll see that the Population formula will produce a graphic that will go up & down like a snake moving in sand if we assign the X-axis a function of TIME (t) and not an "unrestricted" growth like you wrongly visualize. The population formula when used OUT of integration looks like an "unrestricted" graph that only goes up or down because you are really looking at a SPECIFIC segment or ZOOMING into a small segment of the whole range of values through TIME.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@ILBoy I used an average of "r" for all "r's" which are part of the time interval from Noah's times to the present & produced a result similar to the present population of the planet. Although I didn't use INTEGRATION for the formula, by using average "r " for the past 4358 years, what the formula does is averaging the graphed upside and downside curves obtained out of the INTEGRATION process. If we ZOOM a segment for both plotted graphs for the year 2010, the result should be fairly similar.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@MoooHamMad Don't forget, r must remain constant, which can only work during short intervals of time, when a population isn't at carrying capacity nor is it extinct. The case you presented conveniently worked, but what if in the future the population grew so large that the death rate grew massively larger than the birth rate, such that r when averaged out became negative? Would you still hold firm your belief that the flood was possible simply because a formula conveniently worked for you?
InnocentLittleBoy 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy You say "r must remain constant". Mister ILB, "r" is not a constant but a variable. Don't you understand the difference between a constant and a variable? Those are basic math concepts. I'm starting to lose my cool and my patience with you. Your argument is basically this==> If tomorrow WWIII begins and in one year we are reduced to just ONLY 8 people alive in the whole planet, will the population formula give me results compatible with that real-time circumstance? Answer:YES
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy If in one year WWIII begins and we are reduced to 8 people again, the value of "r" will be very close to 0. Then, when you average all "r"s since the time of Noah to the time when WWIII reduced population to 8, the last value of "r" is so strong that it will force the average value of "r" to inevitably be almost 0. Then, when you calculate Population with the formula, the result will be basically 8 because results are real-time.
-
Continues... (almost done with my explanation)
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy The reason the formula gave me a result of almost 6 billion people counting from the time of Noah to the present is because the actual value of "r" doesn't reflect a catastrophic event in history that would give me other result than 6 billion people approximately. The average value of "r" is affected by past values of "r" of course. WWII reduced the population the past 20th century & it affected the average value of "r". If not, the 6 billion result would have been greater.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
@InnocentLittleBoy You can easily put what I say to the test by not using the value of "r" for the 20th century when calculating the average value of "r" for the past 4358 years and you will see how the result for Population is going to be much more greater than 6 billion people. Go ahead and try it and then come to me with the results. If tomorrow we are reduced to 8 people, average "r" will be almost 0 and population will be around 8. Try the formula using "r"= 0.00001 and see for yourself.
MoooHamMad 1 year ago
This video is really stupid. Take a logic class.
gregrutz 2 years ago
What a fucking moron!
thestunnedninja 2 years ago
True evolution is a deception
Tomstered 2 years ago
You were doing fine in the first one. Why stoop to the same sarcastic "better then though" attitude the atheist demonstrate? I think the real atheists that think for them selves will continue to search for truth and find that Evolution is very flaw'd.. Abiogenesis is a good start but misses the point and that God IS NATURAL and super natural.
rpboulan 2 years ago
'better than THOU' you meant.
earthygreen 1 year ago
@rpboulan Abiogenesis and Evolution arent the same theory
coos678 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@coos678 said:"Abiogenesis and Evolution arent the same theory "
yeah and we know why evolutuionists won't go there too. Louis Pasteur proved life can not come from non life. So their must of been some kind of life giver, creator, designer, I.E.; GOD
Ultramediacorp 1 year ago
No, they don't have the same DNA like apes and, well apes [humans]
gregrutz 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cha-ching, chumpchimptard
darwinisatwink 2 years ago
Comment removed
gregrutz 2 years ago
Since when is the moon colliding with the earth in 6000 years? What gives you this idea?
willoughbyorama 2 years ago
why dont you undisable the rating???
dib07ce 2 years ago 3
I'm a christian and I loved this video. It was hilarious. I'm going to send it to my atheist friend. He'll probably laugh even harder then I did. Of course, I'll send him part 1 first. 'the lord god darwin...' rofl and his only begotten son richard dawkins - stop!!! please stop!!! ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lightmane321 2 years ago 2
On every button, on every uniform of the Luftwaffe and the Wehrmacht of Nazi Germany are inscribed the words "GOTT MIT UNS." God with us. Go figure.
futureprimitive 2 years ago
Just because we choose to plaster God's name on something doesn't mean he agrees with it.
babyfacefreeman 2 years ago
Wow, please say you're joking. The 3rd school of thought: you merely have to replace "the lord god Darwin" with "God". Gospel book being the bible which had some nice similarities. And I'm being really serious here, it all fits quite snugly.
Religious people who have done wrong no longer have to feel guilty because they can repent.
Though you'd have to replace the black void with being placed in either of two unreal places, "school shootings" with wars and abortions with untrue godly requests.
SgtLion 2 years ago
Are you kidding me? No, if the your so called beta aliens had any knowledge of evolution, and tools to check not only fossilize remains but also to extract dna and analyze information from it, as we can then they would know that alfa aliens could not in any way come from this world ape descendants.
Please produce evidence for earth being less then 10 000 year old... I would love to hear them...
matkoradic 2 years ago
You'd think that the Beta aliens, being intelligent enough to master interstellar travel, would realise the gorilla fossils share no morphological similarities with the Alphas, and that the Alphas did not evolve from gorillas.
Oh, and eat a dick.
NoeLPZC 2 years ago
don,t drag dr.who in to your little game shit bag
ragekage52 2 years ago
Silliness. They're science and undestanding of science would exceed yours by orders of magnitude. And alien DNA would be different. Your notions are so silly, I, too got quite a laugh. And my IQ is 180, so calling me retarded is also silly. Thanks for the laugh.
RyuDarragh 2 years ago
MoooHamMad
I LOVE IT!!!
Great 'tribute' to the lord god Darwin and his pompous, self deluded, imbecelic son, Dawkins.
Still drying my eyes from tears of laughter.
I can't wait for you to make more videos just like this. Great presentaton, excellent message.
Go get 'em!!
All my best.
foresigns 2 years ago
LOL you are delusional.
We have the fossils, YOU LOST long ago.
infinity730 2 years ago
wow...just wow....the first installment was already hurting to the eyes, but this crapfest of ignorant, nonsensical, uniformed, idiotic, retarded false statements, deluded opinions, misrepresentations and cognitive failures really deserves an award in the most Epic Phail YT video category.
Unless this is satire, in that case, good job!
jzuidema 2 years ago
jzuidema: "...blah, blah, blah, blah..."
MoooHamMad: I'm a Christian that loves Freedom of Speech so much that I will defend Atheists' right to believe that they are apes.
MoooHamMad 2 years ago
"I'm a Christian that loves Freedom of Speech so much that I will defend Atheists' right to believe that they are apes." it's not atheists who define us as apes, its the scientific community which atheists tend to agree with, it the scientific community one day comes out with " we're not apes and there is a god (who just happens to be the Christian one)" and they provide the evidence for it, then atheists will become believers.
manhunt48 2 years ago
nice pic of ur family.....why say shoot me at : 0:07 ? u hate ur family? MoooHamMad are you there? answer me please?
mohali34 2 years ago
ROFLMAO bravo mate, thats some quality pwnage u got there!
PenguinPainterz 2 years ago
Proof that evolution is a lie from the devil: my grandfather wasn't a monkey. maybe yours was, but i doubt it, enjoy burning in agony for all of eternity, heathens.
God bless
donotfeedthetroll 2 years ago
" enjoy burning in agony for all of eternity, heathens." that's very Christian of you. . .
its always the same with you people, constantly ignore every point made then resort to the hell threat. . . do not understand how ridiculous hell is as a concept ?
manhunt48 2 years ago
manhunt48, he's not a Christian. donotfeedthetroll is an Atheist and he always does this all over YouTube because it's funny as hell for him to ridicule Christians. It's like a parody for him.
But what I find really funny is how Atheists like him fool other Atheists like you. He must be laughing at your inability to recognize or discern his sarcasm and I laugh at you for being so quick to judge all Christians. It shows how bigoted and full of hatred you really are. Ha, ha, ha!
MoooHamMad 2 years ago
Then I apologise for my last statement.
"But what I find really funny is how Atheists like him fool other Atheists like you. " Yes well its rather hard to tell who's taking the pee & who's being serious sometimes. I should of called poe's law.
"I laugh at you for being so quick to judge all Christians" Laugh away, i only spoke from experience.
"It shows how bigoted and full of hatred you really are" Really, how so? i'm a bigot & full of hate because i've had countless theists do that to me?
manhunt48 2 years ago
manhunt48 response part 1: I'm a Christian and I agree, well mostly. I look at youtube and other sites and everyone that's supposedly a "Christian" is using the same filthy language as everyone one else. The whole idea of being a Christian is to be Christ-like. Most people on youtube who claim to be a Christian definitly don't fit this criteria. Not to say "they aren't good enough, you must be perfect" It's just that it's not setting a good example for other Christ-followers.
babyfacefreeman 2 years ago 2
"I laugh at you for being so quick to judge all Christians."
I laugh, and then cry, that he is indistinguishable from real YECs.
It's a sorry state when a person comes to the realisation that YECs are actually serious when they say the Earth is 6000 years old :( It breaks my heart that people that dumb actually exist... I guess it's a good thing that they're a minority on the decline, and will eventually be crushed :)
NoeLPZC 2 years ago
1.
NoeLPZC: "It breaks my heart that people that dumb actually exist... I guess it's a good thing that they're a minority on the decline, and will eventually be crushed"
MoooHamMad: I'm going to show you why you are a religious Atheist, a true zealot. First of all what is this CRUSHING statement? In science, you don't crush anyone, you share ideas and test them and establish parameters for further testing.
MoooHamMad 2 years ago
2. By you talking about "minorities" that will be "crushed" you've proved that Atheists don't care about science but care more about forcing pseudo-theories that seem to go hand in hand with your atheo-naturalistic and atheo-humanistic beliefs. You're more religious than I am or will ever be. You are truly a religious nut. Second of all, when you say "it breaks my hearts", it sounds like you now pretend to have feelings when your Atheistic faith doesn't allow you to have "feelings".
MoooHamMad 2 years ago
3. Like your Messiah Dawkins said: "we cant get ethics from science, and there is no justice or design or purpose (no evil or good)DNA doesnt know or caresit is just there". You cannot possibly feel anything in your Atheistic world. Your life is meaningless, listen to your Messiah Dawkins and dont disobey his majestic authority. Read his Gospel, The God Delusion and let your internal no-purpose-at all chemical reactions be soaked in its words and let your internal ape shine in glory.
MoooHamMad 2 years ago
4. Earth in fact is 6,000 years old and not more than 10,000. Non-manipulated and unbiased pure science points to this fact. The billions of years old myth is just that, a myth. Browse and read my comments on the first part of these series to understand why I say so. Science has been hijacked by a bunch of Atheists that have tried hard to perpetuate a 19th century hoax.
MoooHamMad 2 years ago
5. The lie has been perfected but history proves the many times deceit, lies, and hoaxes have been introduced in the Evolution faith to convince people, and sometimes it takes decades to discover such hoaxes as was the case of the Piltdown man. Now a new myth is being pushed down our throats again, THE IDA HOAX. A fossil that is nothing more than a freaking ancient lemur and hidden by someone for 2 years, and magically announced as the missing link & all that without passing through peer-review.
MoooHamMad 2 years ago
6. Your evolutions hoax is the "Greek Myth" of our times and it will get worse as the socialist-communist school system in this socialist non-democratic oligarchy we call USA continues to spread more poison across the land and reaching its hairy ape hand into Europe, and deceiving more and more people of this generation and all those that follow into believing more myths, sold under the label of "science".
MoooHamMad 2 years ago
7. Christians are the True Scientists; they have developed many theories that are still in use today and are the basics of science. This modern world of science and technology we enjoy today is all thanks to Christians, not Atheists. We proudly remember many of our geniuses such as Sir Isaac Newton and many, many more. Science triumphed under their intellects because they weren't manipulated or risked losing their licenses when ideas and theories were produced in their brilliant minds.
MoooHamMad 2 years ago
8. In those times there were no Atheists controlling peer-reviewing and hindering Christians from developing scientific ideas. Atheists have hijacked science and now, science is stagnant, unable to flourish. Any theory that would pose a risk to evolution's authenticity is doomed to fail, not because each new theory has no merit but rather because Atheists that hijacked science will not allow anything to risk their only myth-theory that justifies their Atheistic religion: the myth of evolution.
MoooHamMad 2 years ago
Let's try to be polite here..
1. I find more videos trying to prove creationism than evolution.
2. Ditto. And since when did anyone need god to feel things or have a meaning to life? Christians define humans?
3. I liked how the son of god denied his father's existence, In the video, of course.
4. There's been no evidence to prove that but countless evidence to prove it's older, so I'd like evidence.
5. The Ida was published by the media as a missing link. Athiests know it's just a lemur
SgtLion 2 years ago
Though, perhaps I'm mistaken on #5..
6. Wait, wait, you're calling a democratic society communist and then telling them they're stupid?
7. People like Sir Isaac were religious because it was basically the law to be so then. I seem to remember religion calling Science a heresy, holding us back for about 800 years? Hell, Galileo was prosecuted, possibly killed (No-one is really sure), because he proved the Earth is orbiting the Sun and religion didn't agree.
SgtLion 2 years ago
SgtLion: "People like Sir Isaac were religious because it was basically the law to be so then."
MoooHamMad: Oh really, was that the reason then? So, you put into question his faith in Christianity and you assume he was trying to go with the flow and all that based on what evidence? Hmmm, that explains why he developed his own thesis analyzing all Biblical prophecies using the scientific method & named it 'Universe Cryptogram'. No one put a gun to his head to do so. You really have no point...
MoooHamMad 2 years ago
NO thar is not an Atheistic religion.
hencharlson 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wow, eight comments dedicated to a single word??? That's fucking HILARIOUS!!!!
I'm gunna PM you with my response rather write a thousand comments... but man, THANK YOU for the laugh! XD I know trying to have a meaningful discussion with you will be pointless, but this is too funny to refuse...
NoeLPZC 2 years ago
Wow, you really are stupid aren't you?
johnycannuk 2 years ago 2
johnycannuk: Wow,you really are stupid aren't you?
MoooHamMad: Let me see.
Do I believe in an asteroid that impacted Earth releasing elements that started life on Earth, and all that without proof? No.
Do I believe in reptiles with monkey ears and monkey tails that transform into apes? No
Do I believe in dinosaurs that slowly transform into chickens? Lol, NO
Do I believe in sea creatures evolving into land wolf-like creatures that then transform into whales? No
No, I'm not stupid, are you?
MoooHamMad 2 years ago
Maybe not stupid but ignorant and wrong.
BlizBob 2 years ago 2
Christianity is nearing an end.
Only so long can the mantle of ignorance that Christianity demands be supported.
It is long past the time that reasonable people grew out of these(Christianity, Islam etc.) superstitions.
judoyodan 2 years ago 2
When the "beta" aliens find the alpha alien and gorilla fossils, would they be able to find any DNA? If so, they could tell pretty quickly if they evolved from a common ancestor (not one into the other like you say, that's not how evolution works).
jgoemat 3 years ago
jgoemat: "would they be able to find any DNA? If so, they could tell pretty quickly if they evolved from a common ancestor"
MoooHamMad: Let me mention all the wrong assumptions & statements of your comment. 1st of all, I mentioned in the video a common ancestor which is justified by the time span that separates the period in which humans & gorillas lived & the time when the alpha aliens lived. Because they aren't placed during the same period of time,gorillas indeed can be assumed as ancestors.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
jgoemat: "that's not how evolution works"
MoooHamMad: I know exactly how the evolution hoax works but you simply didn't pay attention to the video's details as I already explained in my previous comment.
You claim that by analyzing the DNA, Beta aliens would instantly know the truth of alpha aliens' origins but there's a problem with that: evidence's value is directly related to its interpretation and the level of technology available to the scientist.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
Your argument is based on your wish that beta aliens would use an interpretation of evidence similar to that of "evolutionists". Even in today's society, scientists disagree in their interpretation of DNA evidence to prove ancient common ancestry. Scientists that follow I.D. theory don't see evidence with the same eyes of "evolutionists". What if the Beta aliens have come to the scientific realization that there is indeed an Intelligent Designer behind life?
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
Why do you assume that being more technologically advanced means being more Atheistic & naturalistic in one's approach? And to be fair, I included in the video the possibility that even among aliens, a few "schools" of thought can emerge in a society they build here on Earth with respect to its origins.
What if the future of science & the scientific nirvana is achieved once we humans come to the full knowledge & realization that there was indeed a Creator that brought everything into existence?
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
"There was a time when religion ruled the world. It is known as The Dark Ages."
-Ruth Hurmence Green
The greeks calculated that the Earth was a sphere and the diameter to within a few percent by observing shadows. Religion taught that the earth was flat and the center of the universe through the dark ages, then they imprisoned Galileo for life for the crime of revealing truth.
Spitting out vacant ideas that contradict evidence is not the way to truth or enlightenment.
jgoemat 3 years ago
jgoemat: "The greeks calculated that the Earth was a sphere and the diameter to within a few percent by observing shadows. Religion taught that the earth was flat and the center of the universe through the dark ages"
MoooHamMad: Religion taught that the Earth is flat? What religion is that? Certainly not Christianity. The Bible uses the Hebrew word CHUWG to describe the Earth. CHUWG means roundness. Bible describes Earth's atmosphere as a dome that covers Earth.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
If the author thought Earth was flat, why cover it with a dome-like "roof" and not use a flat one? Because we know that domes are round, the verses that mention that refer to a round Earth (again) just as Isaiah proposes. Job describes Earth as hanging on nothing in space and thus, going against all general knowledge of its time that claimed that Earth rested on pillars. Job is one of the oldest books not only of Bible but of human history.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
Job also describes Earth's spinning on its own axis by comparing it with the mechanism used by artisans producing Earthenware by using their gyratory machines. Job is the same author that describes the behemoth creature co-existing with humans. The description is completely similar to that of a brachiosaurus.
In NT it says that Jesus will return when it's still daytime for some people & night for others. The verses imply a round Earth that receives sun light on one half of it at any given time.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
Just because a freaking stupid Pope of the dark ages didn't understand those concepts of Bible & decided to persecute people just because he was too idiotic to understand what Bible intended to show, doesn't mean that religion is the exact opposite of science. In fact, by merely analyzing history, anyone can learn that basically all scientific theories we use today were discovered and developed by Christians, not Atheists. I can easily show you a few examples of that in case you dare to deny it.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
And this dome supposedly had holes in it to let rain water through. Seriously have you seen it raining through any gaps in the sky? If you see any could you please plug them up with something because i dont want them to ruin my holiday. thanks in advance :P
burn70u7 3 years ago