it sounds like a bussiness issue. somebody wants to make money by meat and somebody wants to make money by whale watching. they can talk to resolve the issue. why does australia behave like s hypocrite?
whaling countries are outnumbered by anti-whaling countries. that is correct and that is why iwc is not working. whaling countries do not need to be there but most of them are there because:
1. be deplomatic and nice
2. as you said, some countries (actually us) threatened whaling countries (actually japan)
don't you feel anything?
btw you keep saying japan. i wonder what you think about other whaling countries. i assume you are from australia. is is racism?
Calling me racist now. I don't like when some one implies racism. My family lives in Japan, so get over yourself and stop making assumptions.
If you even looked at my website you'll realise WAW is aiming towards Iceland, Norway and Japan. As for people focusing on japan more its just not true, they are infact focusing on ANTARTICA more. Hunting whale is one thing, but in the only true remaining land in the world is another.
i do no think where your family lives means anything for whaling or anti-whaling or even racism but i feel you insist you are not a racist. that is good. at least we can continue to talk. i just suggest you that you should say whaling countries instead of japan. otherwise i smell lots of racism. i hesitate to visit your website even though i do not know where it is. :-)
As for calling australia racist, i strongly disagree. we are very multicultural and do have clashs. But we are made up of many and we are all strong together. We also have a large group of japanese prefering to live in australia. We don't have selective signs on restaurants or even our RSL club (vetrens), australia excepts anyone and if u ask any refugee from asian countries they would say they love australia for giving them a second go at life.
and once again racism won't justify what the internatrional courts decided about japan.
Even if Australia was the most racist country in the whole world and does so many illegal operations... doesn't mean japan can get away with illegal acts in a protected area.
btw if anti-whaling countries out number in the world, get over it thats democracy an if the world doesn't want it japan has to deal with it. Do you want the world to be communist still?
you yourself should know about iwc. iwc was for whaling countries, not anti-whaling countries. then it was changed when anti-whaling countries joined and used it for politics. i have no idea why iwc allowed anti-whaling countries to join to the whaling organization. i know japan also used those landlocked countries. that was how iwc got not functional. they just kept having hatred voting until now but now they are trying to resolve issues and make the meeting functional except australia.
lol.. Australia was the ones who propose the restructure of ther IWC. They are the ones who wanted change.
All i can say is go have a cry, your outnumbered.
So lets get this right IWC is against antartic whaling, the European Commission (whole of europe) is against japan, UN asked for illegal whale trade to stop, USA has threatened export and import bans, ATS is against whaling in its protected waters... hmmm japan really likes making people hate them
why does not australian environment minister mr. garret work just on their own australian envrionmet? are killing kangaroos, aborigines, dingos etc. are ok to him? is it ok they do not have water? what is he doing in chile?
why doesn't japans government work in their own country rather then half way across the world?
Killing aboriginals now? yea I go out every day and just go kill a aboriginal for dinner, what are you a total moron?
when a commerial hunt of endangered wild kangaroos/cows/chickens happens in japan territory over the other side of the world in a protected sanutary against a global ban.... then you can use this excuse.
beside this won't EVER justify japans illegal operation
you are not killing aboriginals today. i know that. but you should know australia finally expressed apology to aboriginals this year. yes, it is this year 2008! i was really impressed. when did they start anti-whaling activities? how long did they ignore aboriginals matters?
btw if u had any knowledge you would know its illegal to kill an animal here in australia, we have somthing called animal rights, maybe japan should read them.
As for our farmed food, they are bred for eating and dont have an impact to its enviroment, they are not endangered like fin whales, there is no global ban against it, its done on OUR soils not in a protected sanutary in antartica againt a interntional protection treaty nor do we illegal trade our farmed foods like japan
LOL even the japanese ICR website say they hunt endangered fin whales. Maybe you should go read that site to actually see what they are doing.
As for your first comment, i was refering to kangaroos etc, but if you wish to go on about antartica... its australian terrority under the ATS, NZ and France threatened japan not to enter their claims or physical force would be used, so now they just stay in Aus. You should be actually thanking us for not being aggressive like other nations of the ATS.
Now I know I know... you don't accept the ATS. so then if you don't accept that, Japan actually signed the IWC whale sanutary in ATS reign. So take your pick what to choose either Australian Territory or IWC whale Sanutary? doesn't matter really japan has been proven by theinternational court as illegal operations
i am not 100% sure what ats means but i guess it is that australia insists some part of antarctica is australian territory. if it is the case, of course i do not support it. i do not think any other countries support it. i repeat any other counries suppots australia own any part of antarctica. if australian anti-whaling policy is based on ats (or whatever it is called), it is much bigger issue than anti-whaling.
The Japanese Whaling Fleets violating international conservation law by slaughtering whales in contrary to the IWC's moratorium on commercial whaling. They're targeting endangered species like Finn whales with future plans to hunt Humpbacks and that's a violation of the convention on international trade in endangered species.
This has been flagged as spam show
The activities of Japan are requests of IWC of all.
The activity of Sea Shepherd is being criticized by all IWC signatories.
"Butyric acid" is a deleterious substance.
International Chemical Safety Cards (ICSCs) prohibits this discharge into nature.
Butyric acid is especially harmful compared with the aquatic life.
Butyric acid makes lose sight.
ShinjukuJogakuen 3 years ago
it sounds like a bussiness issue. somebody wants to make money by meat and somebody wants to make money by whale watching. they can talk to resolve the issue. why does australia behave like s hypocrite?
fruitbonbon 3 years ago 6
whaling countries are outnumbered by anti-whaling countries. that is correct and that is why iwc is not working. whaling countries do not need to be there but most of them are there because:
1. be deplomatic and nice
2. as you said, some countries (actually us) threatened whaling countries (actually japan)
don't you feel anything?
btw you keep saying japan. i wonder what you think about other whaling countries. i assume you are from australia. is is racism?
fruitbonbon 3 years ago 5
Calling me racist now. I don't like when some one implies racism. My family lives in Japan, so get over yourself and stop making assumptions.
If you even looked at my website you'll realise WAW is aiming towards Iceland, Norway and Japan. As for people focusing on japan more its just not true, they are infact focusing on ANTARTICA more. Hunting whale is one thing, but in the only true remaining land in the world is another.
fred100446 3 years ago
Thats why more people are against antartic whaling rather then a country in their OWN coast.
fred100446 3 years ago
i do no think where your family lives means anything for whaling or anti-whaling or even racism but i feel you insist you are not a racist. that is good. at least we can continue to talk. i just suggest you that you should say whaling countries instead of japan. otherwise i smell lots of racism. i hesitate to visit your website even though i do not know where it is. :-)
fruitbonbon 3 years ago 5
You got that right, racism causes nothing but trouble. My relatives are infact japanese, so of course i am not gonig to be racist to them.
When refering to antartic whaling, I'll still continue to say "Japan", as they are the ones doing it - not norway or iceland.
fred100446 3 years ago
As for calling australia racist, i strongly disagree. we are very multicultural and do have clashs. But we are made up of many and we are all strong together. We also have a large group of japanese prefering to live in australia. We don't have selective signs on restaurants or even our RSL club (vetrens), australia excepts anyone and if u ask any refugee from asian countries they would say they love australia for giving them a second go at life.
fred100446 3 years ago
and once again racism won't justify what the internatrional courts decided about japan.
Even if Australia was the most racist country in the whole world and does so many illegal operations... doesn't mean japan can get away with illegal acts in a protected area.
fred100446 3 years ago
btw if anti-whaling countries out number in the world, get over it thats democracy an if the world doesn't want it japan has to deal with it. Do you want the world to be communist still?
fred100446 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What an idiot - call yourself fruitbonbon! - more like fruitcake!
You obviously do not know what the IWC is or who takes part in it.
Australia has every right to be there - far more than the small landlocked countries that Japan bribes to turn up and vote their way!
SSCSactivist 3 years ago
you yourself should know about iwc. iwc was for whaling countries, not anti-whaling countries. then it was changed when anti-whaling countries joined and used it for politics. i have no idea why iwc allowed anti-whaling countries to join to the whaling organization. i know japan also used those landlocked countries. that was how iwc got not functional. they just kept having hatred voting until now but now they are trying to resolve issues and make the meeting functional except australia.
fruitbonbon 3 years ago 5
lol.. Australia was the ones who propose the restructure of ther IWC. They are the ones who wanted change.
All i can say is go have a cry, your outnumbered.
So lets get this right IWC is against antartic whaling, the European Commission (whole of europe) is against japan, UN asked for illegal whale trade to stop, USA has threatened export and import bans, ATS is against whaling in its protected waters... hmmm japan really likes making people hate them
fred100446 3 years ago
why does not australian environment minister mr. garret work just on their own australian envrionmet? are killing kangaroos, aborigines, dingos etc. are ok to him? is it ok they do not have water? what is he doing in chile?
fruitbonbon 3 years ago 3
why doesn't japans government work in their own country rather then half way across the world?
Killing aboriginals now? yea I go out every day and just go kill a aboriginal for dinner, what are you a total moron?
when a commerial hunt of endangered wild kangaroos/cows/chickens happens in japan territory over the other side of the world in a protected sanutary against a global ban.... then you can use this excuse.
beside this won't EVER justify japans illegal operation
fred100446 3 years ago
> Killing aboriginals now?
you are not killing aboriginals today. i know that. but you should know australia finally expressed apology to aboriginals this year. yes, it is this year 2008! i was really impressed. when did they start anti-whaling activities? how long did they ignore aboriginals matters?
fruitbonbon 3 years ago 5
btw if u had any knowledge you would know its illegal to kill an animal here in australia, we have somthing called animal rights, maybe japan should read them.
As for our farmed food, they are bred for eating and dont have an impact to its enviroment, they are not endangered like fin whales, there is no global ban against it, its done on OUR soils not in a protected sanutary in antartica againt a interntional protection treaty nor do we illegal trade our farmed foods like japan
fred100446 3 years ago
> illegal to kill an animal here in australia
as long as i know, japan or any whaling countries do not catch whales in australian sea.
>endangered like fin whales
japan is not catching fin whales but mink, which seems they exist plenty of them.
fruitbonbon 3 years ago 5
LOL even the japanese ICR website say they hunt endangered fin whales. Maybe you should go read that site to actually see what they are doing.
As for your first comment, i was refering to kangaroos etc, but if you wish to go on about antartica... its australian terrority under the ATS, NZ and France threatened japan not to enter their claims or physical force would be used, so now they just stay in Aus. You should be actually thanking us for not being aggressive like other nations of the ATS.
fred100446 3 years ago
Now I know I know... you don't accept the ATS. so then if you don't accept that, Japan actually signed the IWC whale sanutary in ATS reign. So take your pick what to choose either Australian Territory or IWC whale Sanutary? doesn't matter really japan has been proven by theinternational court as illegal operations
fred100446 3 years ago
i am not 100% sure what ats means but i guess it is that australia insists some part of antarctica is australian territory. if it is the case, of course i do not support it. i do not think any other countries support it. i repeat any other counries suppots australia own any part of antarctica. if australian anti-whaling policy is based on ats (or whatever it is called), it is much bigger issue than anti-whaling.
fruitbonbon 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
The Japanese Whaling Fleets violating international conservation law by slaughtering whales in contrary to the IWC's moratorium on commercial whaling. They're targeting endangered species like Finn whales with future plans to hunt Humpbacks and that's a violation of the convention on international trade in endangered species.
pots5150 3 years ago
>ICR website say they hunt endangered fin whales.
can you tell me the link? i wonder how many they caught fin.
fruitbonbon 3 years ago 5
So right back at you - why is japan in chile? why is japan in antartica? get back in your own country!
fred100446 3 years ago
>why is japan in chile?
because this year's iwc meeting was held in chile. :-)
fruitbonbon 3 years ago 5
Therefore Australia was at Chile because of it too.
you don't make sense you say "why is australia in chile" well i asked the same question back and you reply with that????
I think it was a pretty straight forward question from your first comment.
fred100446 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Like delay what? Science? What science is in there dammit!!!
ForSPARTAAAAAAA 3 years ago