I don't think that you know what a 911 Truther is to title this video this way. Truthers think that 911 was an inside job consisting of a massive conspiracy orchestrated by the government. Of course that assertion is absurd.
Lawrence O'Donnell is attacking him bc of his revisionist history and that there was a 'failure' of intelligence.
Someone in the background corrected the MSNBC team being "Marxist" remark with them admittedly being "Socialists". So he wants him to just start spouting facts with no lead up? So they can minimize him? Debating is not to include Marxism of Fascism in its very rules. These are things TO BE DEBATED. Freedom of Speech so that the topic may be DEBATED AND NOT QUELLED. Not silenced , discussed. Not made disgusting through overbearing accusations to silence the message or "DISSENT".
Lawrence has the nerve to say let's exclusively focus on bush from the day he was sworn in but loves it when his wet dream blames bush for everything and in fact helps perpetuate that
Clinton only met w/ his NSA adviser once in his 8yrs. You bet Bush didn't know what was going on. How could he, no one had been paying any attention for 8yrs.
@VictorLepanto Oh that's such bullshit. From January 1998 through the end of his term President Clinton held over 300 meetings on Al-Qaeda and specifically Osama bin Laden's terrorist actions and the threat they could potentially pose to the United States. In 8 and a half months before 9/11 George Bush held ZERO. None. Clinton's anti terror expert Richard Clark even left Bush a comprehensive terror report which Bush ignored and subsequently demoted Clark for writing.
@VictorLepanto Clinton was the first president in our history to ever set up a comprehensive anti terror unit and you want to somehow shift blame to him for Bush's ignorance? If Al Gore had done the kind of preventive work Bush did Republicans wouldn't have let it go for a decade. "Democrats won't protect America. Al Gore is soft on terror. Al Gore's lenient on all lives but Americans." Somehow when Republicans allow the country to get attacked it's still the Democrats fault. A little hypocrisy.
@rar9518: "comprehensive anti terror unit?" What are you going on about? a unit of what, made or whom, which did what? Are wanting me to dance & sing in the street b/c he set up another committee w/ a silly title? Jimmy Carter set up Delta Force. An empty show of bravado to be seen doing something when doing nothing. Typical machiavelian posturing. Doesn't diminish the fact that he only met his NSA adviser ONE time in EIGHT years. He allowed the Taliban to take over Af-stan in the 1st place.
@VictorLepanto The unit was supervised by Clark and I don't know the exact personnel he had. But this is the thing the Bush administration I guess you could call it utilized throughout his Presidency. Bush even called it and this is verbatim, "The only reason an American citizen should have to pay taxes." And Clinton didn't invade Afghanistan but he nearly nabbed most of there leaders including Osama in 1998 had the CIA certified the mission 9/11 would have never happened. Clinton did his job.
@rar9518: If by his job you mean get the money from China, you certainly are right. The fact is that the Somalis offered to send Bin Ladin to Clinton on a silver platter & he refused. The CIA was running an operation in Af-stan & they had a predator drone ready & they could have killed him but Clinton again refused. Clinton did NOTHING about national security. He sold our secrets to China for campaign contributions. I really don't care for you Bizarro Land fantasies.
@VictorLepanto Clinton got closer to killing Bin Laden than Bush and the Somalians in return for Bin Laden wanted technology that would have been dangerous in the hands of unstable citizens. The CIA failed to certify Clinton's missions and Bin Laden escaped. That's the truth Clinton explains it in millions of videos feel free to youtube one. And Clinton sold our secrets to China in 1996? Really? Yeah and Ronald Reagan stole the 1984 election too.
@rar9518: In certain minds facts are a poor substitute of sweer fantasies. Twice (atleast) Clinton had Bin Ladin in his grasp & did nothing about it. Bin Ladin never would have received shelter in Af-stan if Clinton had not sat idly by & allowed the P-stanis to put the Taliban into power there. He didn't care about the world beyond how it might enrich him personally. He left everything to go to Hell. Even Somalia he allowed the war lords to take over there & to shelter Osama.
lawrence didn't make inhuman sounding noises unlike glenn beck and his ilk. being professional should not mean you must be absolutely perfect. i cannot stand this attitude from anyone. this is what leads to high unemployment. demand for perfection is ridiculous.
@chiefdancingostriche Lawrence was screaming like a fucking madman right off the bat. He might have had a valid point, but I couldn't hear it anyway because he was screaming. Why couldn't he just use his inside voice?
I'm not going to side with that other crazy asshole, but he should have calmed down.
@tikifreakazoid as far as humanity is concerned, anger is universal. everyone has to let off steam every now and then. he does not usually get angry but he is also not one to be pushed. a little understanding here.
@chiefdancingostriche Yeah, but he started out by wagging his finger at the other guy (who, to be fair, wouldn't shut up) and acting like a bit of a git. He should have started out calmer. If he had, he would have knocked his opponent out of the ballpark, but he just ended up looking like a prat. I'm not saying he IS one, but that's how he came off.
@chiefdancingostriche Yes, I have. But Lawrence is a professional interviewer; his job requires him to be very even-tempered. He didn't need to get so upset and accusatory, even if Thiessen was a total ass.
Lawrence is right.. FUCK YOU PEOPLE! Bush/Cheney IGNORED NUMEROUS WARNINGS! Including a memo that said OSAMA DETERMINED TO ATTACK AMERICA! FUCK YOU RIGHT WING ASSHOLES! LAWRENCE IS RIGHT!
@George91280 YEAH! HE KNEW THAT TERRORISTS WERE GOING TO TRY TO ATTACK US SOMEWHERE WITH PLANES! WHY DIDN'T HE SHUT DOWN ALL AIRPORTS EVERYWHERE FOREVER?
They didn't ignore shit, and that same memo had no specific dates, claimed that he was going to target other cities and use other methods of attacking us, and would make demands that we let some of his goons go.
That's just the title, and that's not really enough to take any action. The feds actually were trying to find out where. when, and what he was going to strike, so contratry to the twoofer myths, they weren't turning a blind eye to the potential attacks.
This retard would tell me he was Jimmy Hoffa if I waterboarded him, typical Neocon response deny the truth and repeat the same nonsense "TORTURE WORKS"! Oh and fuck the tw00fers as well
9-11 did not occur the way the government and media showed. that being said, i hope Odonnell chokes on a dick sammich. he is just another puppet mouthpiece for the man, trying to raise dust to hide the real crimes. ODONNELL-BE WARNED, WE SEE YOUR CRIMES. WE KNOW WHO YOU WORK FOR.
Hes talking about how Bush got a memo while at Crawford from the CIA saying that they knew that terrorists were going to attack by hi-jacking planes, no one even denies that. That's not saying that bush is the secret mastermind behind the attacks, its saying that hes a moron who had no business being president.
@13AJJONES I think you may have your (or "youre are", if you prefer) caps lock on, young man. That's a function on your keyboard (the letters and stuff on the computer typewriter in front of you) that makes all your letters come out as capitals ("big" letters). Look for the button that says "Caps Lock" and press it, or ask a grown-up you trust to help you out.
Thanks.
P.S: Alex Jones is a ridiculous, chubby little douchebag who profits financially from the tragedy of Sept.11, 2001.
@Canaderek Oh? Alex has been broadcasting for more than 15 years. Somehow your statement just doesn't add up. He was railing against flouride in the public water supply well before 9/11 happened. Lo and behold, the federal government now admits that it causes flourosis of the teeth and bones, causes pitting, and attacks the nervous system. You should watch "The New American Century" at some point. Learn about the PNAC documents. Pointing out bad grammar is a weak argument.
On the whole, however, I prefer David Icke's work. If you're going to opt for delusional paranoia anyways, you might as well toss in some lizard monsters.
Pointing out substandard grammatical ability and, by extension and to a lesser degree, a poor education/low intellect, illustrates the sort of audience to whom Alex Jones' fantasies appeal.
But Jones makes them feel smart - and "in" on something with him.
@Canaderek Yeah. Most people seem to get a kick out of lumping in lizard men and green aliens when it comes to conspiracy theory. I don't believe in either of the two. But I do believe in people being susceptible to greed and the lust for power. Even theory aside, globalism and global government is a real threat. I've seen too much video and read too many articles to convince myself otherwise.
Depending on what you mean by "globalism", I'm all for it.
I think a unified world government is inevitable, with the alternative being extinction. I fear the most likely "version" of a one world government that will come to pass will be, essentially, the "United States of Earth", but in the long run, I think it will be preferable to the horrors of nationalism.
Some say religion is to blame for most war. I believe nationalism/patriotism is an even more obvious, and guilty, culprit.
@Canaderek The European Union has enough problems as is, so to think of a global overall government working, I have my doubts. We would essentially lose our rights as we know them, and what we could or could not do would be dictated worldwide. Almost everything governmental now is controlled by banking institutions when you really look at it. They need money, banks have money. As far as war goes I really think that the military industrial complex is behind many wars for profit and power.
"I really think that the military industrial complex is behind many wars for profit and power."
So we're agreed then. Nationalism is the #1 - well, actually without space aliens, the only ROOT, cause for war. If there were a one world government, there would be no wars (unless you think there would still be a "military industrial complex" mercilessly invading bits of its own self-defended areas - ???).
@Canaderek The problem it seems with global government though is that the people overall wouldn't have a say in things. Human rights would decline. The government would not give you much freedom. They already have cameras popping up everywhere. I don't like the thought of big brother watching me anywhere I go. That's not freedom in my book. The bankers making the laws would be nightmarish. They would take everything. Nobody would truly own property if they have thier way. Total control.
I'm all for more closed circuit cameras in public areas, too. There are always sharp decreases in violent crimes in the areas that use them.
I can understand why some people are frightened of them. I don't want government agents seeing me picking my nose, but for me, it would be well worth it for the highly-increased chances of - for example - a rapist or child abductor being promptly identified and apprehended.
Cameras greatly reduce crime, in private businesses and in the public.
Alright then. I will concede the point regarding your child-like illiteracy.
REGARDLESS of the low level of literacy/education his followers generally possess:
Alex Jones is a ridiculous, chubby little douchebag who profits financially from the tragedy of Sept.11, 2001.
His "arguments" regarding 9/11 revolve around "who benefited" from the tragedy. ANSWER: HE did and does with most of his "work". He sells mountains of books and videos about his paranoid 9/11 delusions.
@Canaderek YOU ARE STILL MUMBLING BULLSHIT !...I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE A REAL DEBATE WITH YOU, BUT YOU STILL WONT WATCH THE FILMS OR READ THE FILES !!!...WHY ???
ARE YOU JUST INCAPABLE OF READING OR WATCHING SOMETHING ??!!
NO,..IT MUST BE FEAR .
AAHAHAHAHAHAHAZZZZAAAA !!!...DONT WORRY,...LITTLE GIRLS ALWAYS GET SCARED OF THE TRUTH.
I have watched and read his garbage. I've written about Jones (and the ignorance of those who follow him like some sort of fat, midget guru).
What's with your obsession with little girls? JUST KIDDING! I DON'T want to know. Really. If you want to continue with the crazy laughter followed by unintelligible crap about little girls being "afraid of truth" (???), please find someone else to shout at.
Or, if you're serious about wanting a debate, we can discuss it here or elsewhere.
@13AJJONES Check out yojimbe's reply to me. He/she is much more lucid (look it up) than you, and easier to debate with.
He used as an actual argument: Jones spoke against fluoridation, which CAN cause dental fluorosis (in people who are also taking in a large amount of fluoride from another source). Dental fluorosis isn't a serious condition, and although several governments have used the process for decades with no significant increase in instances of fluorosis, at least it's SOMETHING.
You'd like to go with sarcasm? Alright. Sounds fun.
PRESS RELEASE:
Although 9 out of 10 dentists - and the American Dental Association - recommend Crest (containing sodium fluoride) , they would also like to add that "SODIUM FLUORIDE KILLS!!!"
Thanks - sincerely - for permission to make light of your adorable little "toothpaste we've used since the 1950s is poisonous" theory.
Let's keep it going. Do the Moon-Landing-Was-Faked bit!
@Canaderek LoL. Never had any inclination to look at the moon landing. Flouride is more of a "soft kill". It bio-accumulates in the liver and other organs and eventually causes organ failure. Let's just say flouride is "good" for your teeth. It should go on your teeth, not in your stomach. You don't drink sun tan lotion to prevent sunburn. Also there is no way to regulate the dose. However thirsty you are is how much flouride you put into your body.
What I'd like to know is,is that Noaf of duh river,or Sarf of duh river?
Oi,geezah,are you gonna be a bleedn iron hoof in a tacky syrup all your life,
or are you gonna be a real man,accept that you are a wa**er,admit you woz wrong abaht all this downtown bo**ox and git dahn the boozer wiv me an the lads an git the beers in? Pick up some nice birds? Kick some c**ts ed in? Get nicked?
You know, propper lads night on the tahn,Lahndahn style.
guess what,they want to make the bailout 100trillion now.Are you people that cowardly that you are going to let them enslave your unborn grandchildren for life. After 911 they don't think.They KNOW you are all idiots and cowards and will take anything they can dishout.You have heard nothing but zion owned tv and radio, it's where you get all of your news since birth.You are brainwashed zombies that think you're brilliant.google, the audio, Protocols of zion audio archive. Enjoy your slavery.
I dare you to watch, Mossad caught in van on 9-11 "filled with explosives" gw bridge. Don't assume you know what all is on it. You probably will because your stupid. You'd have to be to believe that crazy story. If one of those kids had a box cutter, you think you'd let them do that. hahahha. That's a joke. Most of you are too stupid to comprehend how they did it. People, we are being robbed by the same. the bailout was 800billion? NOPE< They've taken 30trillion,obama made it open ended.
no plane at shanksville or pentagon. obvious twin towers exploding ejecting 60ton pieces of steel 600 ft. Two football fields. That's not gravity collapse my very stupid friend. Then building seven, which 93 was supposed to hit but malfunction in the plan. You think they wanted to pull that building like that without plane. hahahha. That is the smoking gun. Do you dolts realize that 7 was overengineered. It was the stouted building in the world many have said. It was a monster. 911inside job
Kurd55, may I call you Fritz? Okay, let me reply, Fritz.
Comment:
"I would think YOU are the cranky one, being that you went out of your way to comment on a post that's 3 months old."
My hypocritical friend (or should I say comrade, since you act like a communist pig), you seem to be the cranky one. Your reply and your channel is full of hate towards conservatives and non-atheists.
O'Donnell is a blustering blowhard. Shouts over sooo much & no wonder the MSNBC host wanted to break & them eliminate O'Donnell (oh, excuse me- I mean that figuratively to all of the liberal vocabulary police out there) ....
I know reality hurts true-blue Bu$h supporters, but get real. 911 happened on Bu$h's watch and then you turn around and claim that he kept us safe? C'mon! That's a prime example of nightmarish clinical delusion. And it's also a fact that it's impossible to use reason while deluded. So, do I expect delusional people to actually HEAR what I'm saying? Sadly no, I don't. Am I happy about these facts? Of course not. Who in their right mind would be?
These guys are clue less. 911/WTC was an inside job and a media job. the WTC had Nano Thermite. It's is a reality found in all samples examined under scanning tunneling electron microscope. So wake up, it's time to die ... just type in nano technology.
@CambridgeHeights really? i thought there was a little red guy underground somewhere called hell...it is a joke, stolen from bill hicks, meant to convey the notion that it is less than honorable to fuck over the mass of humanity for your own personal gain. Satan does not have to be a literal biblical thing. there are gods that exist, created by people, and ol 'satan' is one of em. just because you don't believe in something doesn't mean it doesn't exist in some form, you fool
*Thiessen, sounds so "reasonable" so "nice" compared to that "mean spirited" "911 Truther" & shouter, O'Donnell.* HA! I saw the FBI's, Pickard, testify that before 911 AG John Ashcroft told him he didn't want to hear the word terrorism mentioned in his presence. Clarke & Pickard were going crazy about Al Qaeda. Clarke gets sent to "cyber-security" no-mans-land b/c Rice refuses to listen & basically wants to shut him up. Thiessen is one smarmy liar4hire. One of the best I've ever seen.
Lawrence O'Donnell is totally right in this segment. The people hating on him are simply bitter at their owns sense of guilt and try to shake it off by laughing about it.
Bush had intel that 9/11 was a possibility and didn't react to any of it.
That is the strategy of all the nutjobs! they keep taking and screaming out random tidbits of misquoted or false info, and when they finally get stopped by force, they are all like " look! he tried to shutdown the truth!" once they learn how to have a proper debate, then they might( keyword: might) be a little bit more credible. Those idiots of loose change pull the same shit in the ABC interview and the popular mechanics debate. they sound like 5 year olds arguing with adults.
what was wrong with this video? lawrence o'donnel totally destroyed that dipshit bush speechwriter. The times square bomber was caught under the obama administration, still no recognition from you right wing fucktards.
@adamrosemead Rush WAS addicted to drugs, Larry odonnel should be as it might calm him so he could see things clearly. His anger blinds him to reality.
Are you saying that Rush Limbaugh sees things clearly?!
Was he seeing things "clearly" when, in 1988, he accused the Dems in Congress of "liberal hate speech" for criticizing Reagan's sale of poison gas components to Saddam that we knew were going to be used against Iraqi civilians?
@adamrosemead I have knowledge the comments you are referring to. However I do think Rush see things of a political nature very clearly, much more so then kooky, angry odonnel.
Rush LImbaugh is popular because he tells the rubes what they want to hear.
He doesn't allow dissenting voices heard on his program. As soon as he realizes that a caller is unfriendly the call is cut off so that his listeners don't get to hear the other side.
Lefties like Thom Hartmann go out of their way to invite conservative personalities on his show to debate.
Even progressive comedy radio programs like Stephanie Miller take calls from conservatives.
How come the truth is considered a "wild accusation" when describing conservative commentator's modus operandi?
What conservative commentator regularly debates liberals on the air?
The "tsunami" will go in the opposite direction in two years once the fickle electorate realizes that the Republicans really have NO economic plan other than to offer UNFUNDED tax cuts to their rich base while increasing the deficit.
@adamrosemead "The "tsunami" will go in the opposite direction in two years..."
Wishful thinking on your part. With the GOP winning the majority of state governments and the control of redistricting, the GOP should increase their numbers in DC. Unless they completely fuck up like obama and his feckless supporters did.
You must not have seen Republican politicians like Boehner, McConnell or Cantor hemming & hawing when asked that "gotcha" question:
"WHAT ARE GOING TO DO DIFFERENT NOW THAT YOU CONTROL CONGRESS THAN WHAT YOU DID THE LAST TIME WHEN YOU GOT US INTO THIS MESS?" The never can answer this question.
They tell u that they want to lower the deficit & be fiscally responsible while not being able to admit that the Bush tax cuts & eliminating the estate tax will explode the deficit!!
@europa Sorry, but when you start to extol the virtues of any type of libertarian economic "plan" all I see is another person pushing for the onset of economic anarchy which will basically lead to the survival of the most ruthless at the expense of everyone else.
How can anyone believe that by removing the govt from the economic sphere will bring about anything but economic feudalism?
Left to their own devices would corporations have eliminated child labor on their own?
because you have not educated your self on Libertarian principles of individual rights based on private property upheld by voluntary contracts.
A corporation cant force you to do anything UNLESS legislation through govt intervention provides corporations monopolies through taxation and regulation via Fascism-when corporations run the state
In a free market you vote with your sound money on whats good and bad if its bad it would go out of business or be forced to change
watch Tom Woods( Harvard/Columbia Graduate New York Times best seller Meltdown
watch?v=541bajR4k8g
Austrian theory has predicted the first great Depression and the current and was awarded the Nobel prize to F.A. Hayek in 1979 for Austrian theory of business cycle, the boom and bust
As a hard core lefty pinko, it's funny to see a faithful servant of capitalism, Obama, trying to prolong the existence of a dying system using accepted economic solutions (althought the stimulus was too small) while the Republicans are doing everything possible to prove that Karl Marx was right about how the capitalist ruling class' servants would try to use the power of the govt for the benefit of the monied classes without regard to how their policies hurt the economy!
I have and he is a cheerleader/talking head for the GOP, blind to truth only GOP truth
so right now he's on board because Barry Soetoro is President, Bush did all the same things and he was for it, just like Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and so forth
its not D vs R its American/Constitutionalists vs Globalist
@europa The GOP is more likely to be transformed into a constitutional party then the democrats would be. In fact, this past election is the first step in that transformation.
The Republicans wouldn't recognize the Constitution if it hit them on the head!
If the last Republican administration is any indication, our most sacred document is in serious jeopardy!
Bush regularly ignored the C whenever it suited his administration & sought to strenghten the executive at the expense of the other two branches of govt.
Reagan, the R's favorite pin up, intentionally ignored our govt's checks & balances by going behind Congress' back to back the Contras.
@adamrosemead I don't disagree with you on that. The GOP has been very disappointing in regards to constitutional rights and fiscal responsibility. Obviously a lot of people get that which gave rise to the Tea party. I said I think the GOP is much more likely to be transformed into a constitutional party then the dems are. Which party does Ron Paul belong to? People like Ron Paul need help by have more people like him in DC and you won't find them in the left wing.
If rich people/corporations would benefit from Libertarianism, then why didn't they back Ron Paul during his run in 2008? Why did Obama get a majority of the 250k + votes compared to McCain. Most of Ron Paul's support is grassroots/non-big business. Maybe a few people like the guy from Pay Pal support him, but the overwhelming majority of rich people back people like Obama you know, people that want BIG government. A corporation cannot exist without a big government.
Obama is very much a corporate Dem, NOT the liberal socialist that Republicans like to portray. His policies have been intended to prolong a dying capitalist system.
Ron Paul's anti-war message would have turned off too many of his Republican backers to make him a viable candidate against Obama.
While corporatists may want a govt that protects their assets they are not as keen when govt is intent (& able) to prevent them from engaging in questionable profit making practices.
Regardless of his anti-intervention platform, his principles and views on the market would, you think, have the Corporation right behind him during his Presidential, run but no, that wasn't the case. His money bombs have been nothing but ordinary citizen donations. Obama & McCain's contributions were nothing but fake "grassroots" - most money was donated by Corporations and other big businesses.
Clueless conservatives often refer to Obama as a socialist out to destroy capitalism w/o knowing that two of his 1st three economic advisors were followers of Milton Friedman, the father of Reaganomics, or , as I prefer to call it, the Destruction of the Middle-class.
@Maxwedge12000 Some of the more radical Republicans (or their spokespeople) have said that they might resort to violence whenever the results at the ballot box don't come out in their favor!!
How's that for respecting our democracy?
We libs have the ACLU to protect our constitutional rights & have a constitutional scholar in the office of the presidency.
What do the Republicans have besides talk when it comes to supporting our Constitution?
Gee, Max, are going to tell me that someone who taught CONSTITUTIONAL LAW for TWELVE YEARS at the Univ of Chicago Law School is NOT a Constitutional scholar?
Who would you consider a Constitutional scholar then, Harriet Miers?
Not only is Liz Cheney a weak debater, she is also a lying scumbag. Lawrence O'donnell is NOT a 911 truther. He absolutely ravaged the lunatic he was facing.
Am I the only one who the irony isn't lost on? O'donnell makes the very same argument as the guest. The emphasis is government negligence = vulnerable to terrorism. The only difference is that the guest is making an assertion: it's conjecture. It may be true, but at present it is only that, while O'donnell is simply reviewing recent history, which just about everyone admits.
Yet O'donnell is the conspiracy nut? Carry forward your own logic. They have to BOTH be conspiracy nuts, right?
The title's misleading. O'donnell was obviously talking about the exact same thing as the guest: government negligence. It's obviously ridiculous and hypocritical to accuse him of being a conspiracy theorist when he's citing the precise same negligence as the guest. You're purposefully misinterpreting it for people.
And it's a fucking joke that Scarborough calls the woman a 'Marxist' at the beginning of the clip. Come on, what's that about? It's fucktarded.
I don't think that you know what a 911 Truther is to title this video this way. Truthers think that 911 was an inside job consisting of a massive conspiracy orchestrated by the government. Of course that assertion is absurd.
Lawrence O'Donnell is attacking him bc of his revisionist history and that there was a 'failure' of intelligence.
mookow77 1 month ago
Joe Scarborough---Mr Potato Head.
37Dionysos 1 month ago
@kurd55 =Child Molester
EastTimor1 1 month ago
Someone in the background corrected the MSNBC team being "Marxist" remark with them admittedly being "Socialists". So he wants him to just start spouting facts with no lead up? So they can minimize him? Debating is not to include Marxism of Fascism in its very rules. These are things TO BE DEBATED. Freedom of Speech so that the topic may be DEBATED AND NOT QUELLED. Not silenced , discussed. Not made disgusting through overbearing accusations to silence the message or "DISSENT".
Must I CONFORM?
Fred420ist 2 months ago
Get em Lawrence!!!
jcannion 2 months ago
I would've cut Lawrences audio off and let him rant to himself.
TruthersRAlwaysWrong 3 months ago
Lawrence is such a troll
Rucka4life1 4 months ago
This clip is so funny. Lawrence is right on the money as usual.
CoffySarai 4 months ago
Him and Rachel Maddow are the two best people on MSNBC.
SensoryOssuary 5 months ago
I want to dick slap all these tools....media in this country is in collusion with criminal elements that have hijacked our country
okturus 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was an inside job . Plane and simple.
bmw200000 5 months ago
Lawrence O'Dickhead
gotyourtongue 5 months ago
@gotyourtongue=Bitch
MaskedChongGetBac 5 months ago
Brzenski is the IDIOT daughter of Zig the New World Order Scum.
She is complete Stupid Trash.. but I would fuck her and then kill her.
Mi37591 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EastTimor1 = Racist Tea-bagger Stalker
kurd55 6 months ago
Lawrence has the nerve to say let's exclusively focus on bush from the day he was sworn in but loves it when his wet dream blames bush for everything and in fact helps perpetuate that
rockinandout 6 months ago
lawrence was the only sane man there
SAOTUBE 6 months ago
hahahaha, I cant believe this guy gets a show.
Ideologues on fox: hannity and about 70% of O'reilly.
Nut bag ideologues on MSNBC: O'Donnell, Matthews, Maddow, Sharpton (LOL!), Schultz, now the Nation's Chris Hayes.
Fox is not the source of cable news making opinion fact and raising the heated rhetoric.
MSNBC is.
2010CAS 7 months ago
God forbid someone (ie. Lawrence) gets to ask a question that doesn't kiss the guest's rear end. "We're going to commercial people!"
Asher8328 7 months ago
@Asher8328 it is called decorum
scrambledpenis 7 months ago
Clinton only met w/ his NSA adviser once in his 8yrs. You bet Bush didn't know what was going on. How could he, no one had been paying any attention for 8yrs.
VictorLepanto 7 months ago
@VictorLepanto Oh that's such bullshit. From January 1998 through the end of his term President Clinton held over 300 meetings on Al-Qaeda and specifically Osama bin Laden's terrorist actions and the threat they could potentially pose to the United States. In 8 and a half months before 9/11 George Bush held ZERO. None. Clinton's anti terror expert Richard Clark even left Bush a comprehensive terror report which Bush ignored and subsequently demoted Clark for writing.
rar9518 7 months ago
@VictorLepanto Clinton was the first president in our history to ever set up a comprehensive anti terror unit and you want to somehow shift blame to him for Bush's ignorance? If Al Gore had done the kind of preventive work Bush did Republicans wouldn't have let it go for a decade. "Democrats won't protect America. Al Gore is soft on terror. Al Gore's lenient on all lives but Americans." Somehow when Republicans allow the country to get attacked it's still the Democrats fault. A little hypocrisy.
rar9518 7 months ago
@rar9518: "comprehensive anti terror unit?" What are you going on about? a unit of what, made or whom, which did what? Are wanting me to dance & sing in the street b/c he set up another committee w/ a silly title? Jimmy Carter set up Delta Force. An empty show of bravado to be seen doing something when doing nothing. Typical machiavelian posturing. Doesn't diminish the fact that he only met his NSA adviser ONE time in EIGHT years. He allowed the Taliban to take over Af-stan in the 1st place.
VictorLepanto 7 months ago
@VictorLepanto The unit was supervised by Clark and I don't know the exact personnel he had. But this is the thing the Bush administration I guess you could call it utilized throughout his Presidency. Bush even called it and this is verbatim, "The only reason an American citizen should have to pay taxes." And Clinton didn't invade Afghanistan but he nearly nabbed most of there leaders including Osama in 1998 had the CIA certified the mission 9/11 would have never happened. Clinton did his job.
rar9518 7 months ago
@rar9518: If by his job you mean get the money from China, you certainly are right. The fact is that the Somalis offered to send Bin Ladin to Clinton on a silver platter & he refused. The CIA was running an operation in Af-stan & they had a predator drone ready & they could have killed him but Clinton again refused. Clinton did NOTHING about national security. He sold our secrets to China for campaign contributions. I really don't care for you Bizarro Land fantasies.
VictorLepanto 7 months ago
@VictorLepanto Clinton got closer to killing Bin Laden than Bush and the Somalians in return for Bin Laden wanted technology that would have been dangerous in the hands of unstable citizens. The CIA failed to certify Clinton's missions and Bin Laden escaped. That's the truth Clinton explains it in millions of videos feel free to youtube one. And Clinton sold our secrets to China in 1996? Really? Yeah and Ronald Reagan stole the 1984 election too.
rar9518 6 months ago
@rar9518: In certain minds facts are a poor substitute of sweer fantasies. Twice (atleast) Clinton had Bin Ladin in his grasp & did nothing about it. Bin Ladin never would have received shelter in Af-stan if Clinton had not sat idly by & allowed the P-stanis to put the Taliban into power there. He didn't care about the world beyond how it might enrich him personally. He left everything to go to Hell. Even Somalia he allowed the war lords to take over there & to shelter Osama.
VictorLepanto 6 months ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is a complete dick --- both on air and off. He is also an unhinged lunatic.
Bando2181 7 months ago
lawrence didn't make inhuman sounding noises unlike glenn beck and his ilk. being professional should not mean you must be absolutely perfect. i cannot stand this attitude from anyone. this is what leads to high unemployment. demand for perfection is ridiculous.
chiefdancingostriche 8 months ago
lawrence o'donnell tells the truth, joe scarborough goes to commercial break.
chiefdancingostriche 8 months ago
@chiefdancingostriche Lawrence was screaming like a fucking madman right off the bat. He might have had a valid point, but I couldn't hear it anyway because he was screaming. Why couldn't he just use his inside voice?
I'm not going to side with that other crazy asshole, but he should have calmed down.
tikifreakazoid 8 months ago
@tikifreakazoid as far as humanity is concerned, anger is universal. everyone has to let off steam every now and then. he does not usually get angry but he is also not one to be pushed. a little understanding here.
chiefdancingostriche 8 months ago
@chiefdancingostriche Yeah, but he started out by wagging his finger at the other guy (who, to be fair, wouldn't shut up) and acting like a bit of a git. He should have started out calmer. If he had, he would have knocked his opponent out of the ballpark, but he just ended up looking like a prat. I'm not saying he IS one, but that's how he came off.
tikifreakazoid 8 months ago
@tikifreakazoid so you've never exploded in anger before, eh?
chiefdancingostriche 8 months ago
@chiefdancingostriche Yes, I have. But Lawrence is a professional interviewer; his job requires him to be very even-tempered. He didn't need to get so upset and accusatory, even if Thiessen was a total ass.
tikifreakazoid 8 months ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is a left-wing, elitist douchebag. A perfect host for MSNBC.
topjimmy72 8 months ago
Lawrence is right.. FUCK YOU PEOPLE! Bush/Cheney IGNORED NUMEROUS WARNINGS! Including a memo that said OSAMA DETERMINED TO ATTACK AMERICA! FUCK YOU RIGHT WING ASSHOLES! LAWRENCE IS RIGHT!
George91280 8 months ago
@George91280 YEAH! HE KNEW THAT TERRORISTS WERE GOING TO TRY TO ATTACK US SOMEWHERE WITH PLANES! WHY DIDN'T HE SHUT DOWN ALL AIRPORTS EVERYWHERE FOREVER?
What the fuck is wrong with you?
tikifreakazoid 8 months ago
@George91280
They didn't ignore shit, and that same memo had no specific dates, claimed that he was going to target other cities and use other methods of attacking us, and would make demands that we let some of his goons go.
DTD110865 5 months ago
@DTD110865 I believe the memo was titled "Osama Bin Laden determined to attack US using Planes"
They had enough info to make an 'attempt' at stopping it.
FireLineStudios 5 months ago
@FireLineStudios
That's just the title, and that's not really enough to take any action. The feds actually were trying to find out where. when, and what he was going to strike, so contratry to the twoofer myths, they weren't turning a blind eye to the potential attacks.
DTD110865 5 months ago
I love when Lawrence
gets his Irish up.
emzyk 8 months ago
This retard would tell me he was Jimmy Hoffa if I waterboarded him, typical Neocon response deny the truth and repeat the same nonsense "TORTURE WORKS"! Oh and fuck the tw00fers as well
viletree 9 months ago
Lawrence the baby
dewerbylhserf 9 months ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is a Class A A**hole. Ther ei sno other nice way to put it. He a low life on and off the air.
mcleanva 9 months ago
@mcleanva just like you Keepamericasafe bitch!
JohnZieglerSUCKS 9 months ago
What a fag. Lawrence the Fag. Catchy.
Yeshua9000 9 months ago
@Yeshua9000 You are a fag!
JohnZieglerSUCKS 9 months ago
Thugs like Lawrence O'Donnell have taken over America!
dewerbylhserf 9 months ago
@dewerbylhserf Fuck you bitch!
JohnZieglerSUCKS 9 months ago
What is this guy talking about? They had the names of hijackers and their bios 1 hour after the 1st tower was imploded.
Obama is an Elite appointment. He does what his bosses tell him to do, just as Bushes and Clintons did what they bosses told them to do.
LO is a fool.
074August 10 months ago
They sure shut down the "truther" "going crazy". How dare he disrupt the right-wing liberal media's job.
3rdPR 10 months ago
I wonder if KSM has a family of birds living in his beard.
gombis666 10 months ago 4
O'Donnell is just nuts.
RetSquid 10 months ago
Lawrence? Lawrence? Lawrence? C'mon, Lawrence? Lawrence? Lawrence? Lawrence? Lawrence? C'mon, Lawrence? Lawrence? Lawrence? Lawrence? Lawrence? Lawrence?
rayalvarado2010 10 months ago
the fat fuck is a speech writer for bush HAHAHAHAHA what speech writing?
HPhenomenal 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anyone who still doesn't know that 9/11 was an inside job simply hasn't seen the evidence yet. Here's a link to some of it.
spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?p=4013083#post4013083
Cosmored 11 months ago
9-11 did not occur the way the government and media showed. that being said, i hope Odonnell chokes on a dick sammich. he is just another puppet mouthpiece for the man, trying to raise dust to hide the real crimes. ODONNELL-BE WARNED, WE SEE YOUR CRIMES. WE KNOW WHO YOU WORK FOR.
hamsackbag 11 months ago
what panzies, if they want higher ratings they should let the two go at it
kyokushin25mgt 11 months ago
He does not appear to be a 9/11 truther...
tinzovideo 11 months ago
the dude O'donnell is owning looks like a straight up douche bag.
marnold6879 1 year ago
lawrence is brilliant, makes joe look lame.
fidobarks 1 year ago
A classic example of modern day debating. If you can't out debate 'em, just shout over 'em.
seichel07 1 year ago
Lawrence O'Donnell isn't a 9/11 truther....
Hes talking about how Bush got a memo while at Crawford from the CIA saying that they knew that terrorists were going to attack by hi-jacking planes, no one even denies that. That's not saying that bush is the secret mastermind behind the attacks, its saying that hes a moron who had no business being president.
cronos225 1 year ago 18
KEEPAMERCIASAFE=SMEAR BITCH!
Sweepersucksballs 1 year ago
lawrence odonell 9/11 truther ?!?!?! WHAT A JOKE!!! Blaming bush for 9/11 is not the same as being a truther. But keep trying
AMTBaptista 1 year ago
ITS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS, WHY I DO ANYTHING THE WAY I DO IT....EVIDENTLY YOU DISAGREE .
13AJJONES 1 year ago
ARE ALL YOU IDIOTS WILLING NOW, TO ADMIT THAT OSAMA WAS A CIA ASSET, AND SO WAS ANWAR AL ALAKI ?
THATS FUNNY,...CUZ OVER 35 AGENTS AND WISTLEBLOWERS HAVE ADMITTED ITS TRUE, AND SO DO THE FOIA FILES THAT WERE NOW RELEASED !
THEY DONT EVEN DENY IT ANYMORE !
BUT YOU TOOLS DO.
WATCH "FABLED ENEMIES" ON YOUTUBE, AND THEN SAY YOURE ARE NOT WRONG.
13AJJONES 1 year ago
@13AJJONES Sez: "...AND THEN SAY YOURE ARE NOT WRONG."
Nice to see strong intellectual debate online!
Canaderek 1 year ago
@Canaderek I SAID A COUPLE THINGS B-4 THAT TOO, GENIUS.
13AJJONES 1 year ago
@13AJJONES I think you may have your (or "youre are", if you prefer) caps lock on, young man. That's a function on your keyboard (the letters and stuff on the computer typewriter in front of you) that makes all your letters come out as capitals ("big" letters). Look for the button that says "Caps Lock" and press it, or ask a grown-up you trust to help you out.
Thanks.
P.S: Alex Jones is a ridiculous, chubby little douchebag who profits financially from the tragedy of Sept.11, 2001.
Canaderek 1 year ago
Comment removed
13AJJONES 1 year ago
@13AJJONES Pardon...?
Canaderek 1 year ago
@Canaderek Oh? Alex has been broadcasting for more than 15 years. Somehow your statement just doesn't add up. He was railing against flouride in the public water supply well before 9/11 happened. Lo and behold, the federal government now admits that it causes flourosis of the teeth and bones, causes pitting, and attacks the nervous system. You should watch "The New American Century" at some point. Learn about the PNAC documents. Pointing out bad grammar is a weak argument.
yojimbe1 1 year ago
@yojimbe1
I've watched "New American Century".
It's hilarious.
On the whole, however, I prefer David Icke's work. If you're going to opt for delusional paranoia anyways, you might as well toss in some lizard monsters.
Pointing out substandard grammatical ability and, by extension and to a lesser degree, a poor education/low intellect, illustrates the sort of audience to whom Alex Jones' fantasies appeal.
But Jones makes them feel smart - and "in" on something with him.
That's the appeal.
Canaderek 1 year ago
@Canaderek Yeah. Most people seem to get a kick out of lumping in lizard men and green aliens when it comes to conspiracy theory. I don't believe in either of the two. But I do believe in people being susceptible to greed and the lust for power. Even theory aside, globalism and global government is a real threat. I've seen too much video and read too many articles to convince myself otherwise.
yojimbe1 1 year ago
@yojimbe1
Depending on what you mean by "globalism", I'm all for it.
I think a unified world government is inevitable, with the alternative being extinction. I fear the most likely "version" of a one world government that will come to pass will be, essentially, the "United States of Earth", but in the long run, I think it will be preferable to the horrors of nationalism.
Some say religion is to blame for most war. I believe nationalism/patriotism is an even more obvious, and guilty, culprit.
Canaderek 1 year ago
@Canaderek The European Union has enough problems as is, so to think of a global overall government working, I have my doubts. We would essentially lose our rights as we know them, and what we could or could not do would be dictated worldwide. Almost everything governmental now is controlled by banking institutions when you really look at it. They need money, banks have money. As far as war goes I really think that the military industrial complex is behind many wars for profit and power.
yojimbe1 1 year ago
@yojimbe1
"I really think that the military industrial complex is behind many wars for profit and power."
So we're agreed then. Nationalism is the #1 - well, actually without space aliens, the only ROOT, cause for war. If there were a one world government, there would be no wars (unless you think there would still be a "military industrial complex" mercilessly invading bits of its own self-defended areas - ???).
Canaderek 1 year ago
@Canaderek The problem it seems with global government though is that the people overall wouldn't have a say in things. Human rights would decline. The government would not give you much freedom. They already have cameras popping up everywhere. I don't like the thought of big brother watching me anywhere I go. That's not freedom in my book. The bankers making the laws would be nightmarish. They would take everything. Nobody would truly own property if they have thier way. Total control.
yojimbe1 1 year ago
@yojimbe1
I'm all for more closed circuit cameras in public areas, too. There are always sharp decreases in violent crimes in the areas that use them.
I can understand why some people are frightened of them. I don't want government agents seeing me picking my nose, but for me, it would be well worth it for the highly-increased chances of - for example - a rapist or child abductor being promptly identified and apprehended.
Cameras greatly reduce crime, in private businesses and in the public.
Canaderek 1 year ago
@Canaderek AND YOU WRITE ..'SEZ'....SO YOURE JUST A HYPOCRITE .
YOU PEOPLE ALWAYS PICK ON SPELLING. OR COMPUTER JARGON, WHEN YOU CANT DEBATE AN ISSUE WITH FACTS.
13AJJONES 1 year ago
@13AJJONES
Alright then. I will concede the point regarding your child-like illiteracy.
REGARDLESS of the low level of literacy/education his followers generally possess:
Alex Jones is a ridiculous, chubby little douchebag who profits financially from the tragedy of Sept.11, 2001.
His "arguments" regarding 9/11 revolve around "who benefited" from the tragedy. ANSWER: HE did and does with most of his "work". He sells mountains of books and videos about his paranoid 9/11 delusions.
Pure scum.
Canaderek 1 year ago
@Canaderek YOU ARE STILL MUMBLING BULLSHIT !...I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE A REAL DEBATE WITH YOU, BUT YOU STILL WONT WATCH THE FILMS OR READ THE FILES !!!...WHY ???
ARE YOU JUST INCAPABLE OF READING OR WATCHING SOMETHING ??!!
NO,..IT MUST BE FEAR .
AAHAHAHAHAHAHAZZZZAAAA !!!...DONT WORRY,...LITTLE GIRLS ALWAYS GET SCARED OF THE TRUTH.
13AJJONES 1 year ago
@13AJJONES
I have watched and read his garbage. I've written about Jones (and the ignorance of those who follow him like some sort of fat, midget guru).
What's with your obsession with little girls? JUST KIDDING! I DON'T want to know. Really. If you want to continue with the crazy laughter followed by unintelligible crap about little girls being "afraid of truth" (???), please find someone else to shout at.
Or, if you're serious about wanting a debate, we can discuss it here or elsewhere.
Canaderek 1 year ago
@Canaderek HE IS A SOUCE OF INFO, THAT CAN BE EASILY VERIFIED .
HE IS A SOUCE.
YOU SEEM TO BE THE ONE WHO IS OBSESSED WITH THE GUY.
I CHECK HIS SITE EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, BUT I USUALLY ALREADY HAVE READ ABOUT HIS 'TOPIC OF THE DAY'
AGAIN, YOU HAVNT WATCHED OR READ ANYTHING, OR YOU WOULD NO HOW TO FACT CHECK SOMETHING....NOW, HOW ABOUT YOU FUCK OFF , INSTEAD....YEH ?
13AJJONES 1 year ago
@13AJJONES Check out yojimbe's reply to me. He/she is much more lucid (look it up) than you, and easier to debate with.
He used as an actual argument: Jones spoke against fluoridation, which CAN cause dental fluorosis (in people who are also taking in a large amount of fluoride from another source). Dental fluorosis isn't a serious condition, and although several governments have used the process for decades with no significant increase in instances of fluorosis, at least it's SOMETHING.
Canaderek 1 year ago
@Canaderek LoL. Classy. HEY EVERYBODY! CHECK OUT HIS POST! BOY DID HE PUT ME ON BLAST. HOWEVER WILL I LIVE FROM THIS. WOE IS ME.
Sodium Flouride is a poison. Make light of it as much as you want.
yojimbe1 1 year ago
@yojimbe1
You'd like to go with sarcasm? Alright. Sounds fun.
PRESS RELEASE:
Although 9 out of 10 dentists - and the American Dental Association - recommend Crest (containing sodium fluoride) , they would also like to add that "SODIUM FLUORIDE KILLS!!!"
Thanks - sincerely - for permission to make light of your adorable little "toothpaste we've used since the 1950s is poisonous" theory.
Let's keep it going. Do the Moon-Landing-Was-Faked bit!
Canaderek 1 year ago
@Canaderek LoL. Never had any inclination to look at the moon landing. Flouride is more of a "soft kill". It bio-accumulates in the liver and other organs and eventually causes organ failure. Let's just say flouride is "good" for your teeth. It should go on your teeth, not in your stomach. You don't drink sun tan lotion to prevent sunburn. Also there is no way to regulate the dose. However thirsty you are is how much flouride you put into your body.
yojimbe1 1 year ago
Downtown London???
What I'd like to know is,is that Noaf of duh river,or Sarf of duh river?
Oi,geezah,are you gonna be a bleedn iron hoof in a tacky syrup all your life,
or are you gonna be a real man,accept that you are a wa**er,admit you woz wrong abaht all this downtown bo**ox and git dahn the boozer wiv me an the lads an git the beers in? Pick up some nice birds? Kick some c**ts ed in? Get nicked?
You know, propper lads night on the tahn,Lahndahn style.
Give us a showt mwsh.
Nice vid mayte.
UtubularBalls 1 year ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is a joke!
dijhili 1 year ago
@dijhili "FABLED ENEMIES" ON YOUTUBE...YOU'LL LOVE IT.
13AJJONES 1 year ago
O'Donnell isn't a truther all he is saying is that Bush had prior knowledge of plans to attack the White House.
aaron02668 1 year ago
@aaron02668 the CIA reported that an attack was likely but thats about it nothing more bush was stupid not an evil genious
serioushamster 1 year ago
"Really got his show on MSNBC" (and it's fabulous)
viviananderson 1 year ago
guess what,they want to make the bailout 100trillion now.Are you people that cowardly that you are going to let them enslave your unborn grandchildren for life. After 911 they don't think.They KNOW you are all idiots and cowards and will take anything they can dishout.You have heard nothing but zion owned tv and radio, it's where you get all of your news since birth.You are brainwashed zombies that think you're brilliant.google, the audio, Protocols of zion audio archive. Enjoy your slavery.
sssssjjjj1 1 year ago
I dare you to watch, Mossad caught in van on 9-11 "filled with explosives" gw bridge. Don't assume you know what all is on it. You probably will because your stupid. You'd have to be to believe that crazy story. If one of those kids had a box cutter, you think you'd let them do that. hahahha. That's a joke. Most of you are too stupid to comprehend how they did it. People, we are being robbed by the same. the bailout was 800billion? NOPE< They've taken 30trillion,obama made it open ended.
sssssjjjj1 1 year ago
no plane at shanksville or pentagon. obvious twin towers exploding ejecting 60ton pieces of steel 600 ft. Two football fields. That's not gravity collapse my very stupid friend. Then building seven, which 93 was supposed to hit but malfunction in the plan. You think they wanted to pull that building like that without plane. hahahha. That is the smoking gun. Do you dolts realize that 7 was overengineered. It was the stouted building in the world many have said. It was a monster. 911inside job
sssssjjjj1 1 year ago
"But like I said, that DADT repeal really hurt you racist, bigoted, gun-worshipers."
You really want to go there, huh? Uhm… I may have to diagram that sentence, and then get back to you.
WenchesOfRedemption 1 year ago
Kurd55, let me break it down for you.
Author : Kurd55
Kurd55, may I call you Fritz? Okay, let me reply, Fritz.
Comment:
"I would think YOU are the cranky one, being that you went out of your way to comment on a post that's 3 months old."
My hypocritical friend (or should I say comrade, since you act like a communist pig), you seem to be the cranky one. Your reply and your channel is full of hate towards conservatives and non-atheists.
WenchesOfRedemption 1 year ago
O'Donnell is an absolute psychotic and so is anyone who would ever take him seriously.
Sage80 1 year ago
2 great links exposing the hypocrisy of the Left.
"Classmate Of Gifford’s Shooter: He Was “Quite Liberal” ":
SayAnythingBlog*com/entry/classmate-of-giffords-shooter-he-was-quite-liberal
"The progressive “climate of hate:” An illustrated primer, 2000-2010":
MichelleMalkin*com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010
Even DEM Ed Koch has says the attacks R unfair.
Liberal attacks & smearing is to stifle non-conformists
harry4health 1 year ago
O'Donnell is a blustering blowhard. Shouts over sooo much & no wonder the MSNBC host wanted to break & them eliminate O'Donnell (oh, excuse me- I mean that figuratively to all of the liberal vocabulary police out there) ....
harry4health 1 year ago
O;Donnell is a Socialist jerk. He cannot think for himself.His program is on it's last leg. bye, bye
bnjones28 1 year ago
911 conspiracy theorists are retarded. So are people who deny that the reigning administration at the time had no fault.
EARTH51087 1 year ago
I know reality hurts true-blue Bu$h supporters, but get real. 911 happened on Bu$h's watch and then you turn around and claim that he kept us safe? C'mon! That's a prime example of nightmarish clinical delusion. And it's also a fact that it's impossible to use reason while deluded. So, do I expect delusional people to actually HEAR what I'm saying? Sadly no, I don't. Am I happy about these facts? Of course not. Who in their right mind would be?
kurd55 1 year ago
These guys are clue less. 911/WTC was an inside job and a media job. the WTC had Nano Thermite. It's is a reality found in all samples examined under scanning tunneling electron microscope. So wake up, it's time to die ... just type in nano technology.
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
McConnell isn't a truther in the generally accepted definition of the term. He's smarter than that.
TimPhelan 1 year ago
Thiessen + scarborough = suckers of satan's cock
sulfurousstench 1 year ago
@sulfurousstench Satan doesn't exist you fool
CambridgeHeights 1 year ago
@CambridgeHeights really? i thought there was a little red guy underground somewhere called hell...it is a joke, stolen from bill hicks, meant to convey the notion that it is less than honorable to fuck over the mass of humanity for your own personal gain. Satan does not have to be a literal biblical thing. there are gods that exist, created by people, and ol 'satan' is one of em. just because you don't believe in something doesn't mean it doesn't exist in some form, you fool
sulfurousstench 1 year ago
danger0usknowledge 1 year ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is totally right in this segment. The people hating on him are simply bitter at their owns sense of guilt and try to shake it off by laughing about it.
Bush had intel that 9/11 was a possibility and didn't react to any of it.
Staticnz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Staticnz lol. u are you simplistic.
Sage80 1 year ago
O'Donnell is such a hot headed jerk
AndyHandy2010 1 year ago
That is the strategy of all the nutjobs! they keep taking and screaming out random tidbits of misquoted or false info, and when they finally get stopped by force, they are all like " look! he tried to shutdown the truth!" once they learn how to have a proper debate, then they might( keyword: might) be a little bit more credible. Those idiots of loose change pull the same shit in the ABC interview and the popular mechanics debate. they sound like 5 year olds arguing with adults.
supermario0192837465 1 year ago
I like this video. Thank you for your sharing. Hope to see next your video.
many9662 1 year ago
Lawrence called Marc Thiessen out on his BULLSHIT! And Joe Scarborough is a douchebag!
eluvre 1 year ago
That a boy, Larry!
TheForwardGaze 1 year ago
Scarborough is such a pussy.
blayzen 1 year ago
what was wrong with this video? lawrence o'donnel totally destroyed that dipshit bush speechwriter. The times square bomber was caught under the obama administration, still no recognition from you right wing fucktards.
halflifeproductionz 1 year ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is scum...Dramatic scum... Obnoxious scum... But scum, nonetheless!
Slave2Reason 1 year ago
Odonnel is just so mean spirited he fails to see how terrible he looks and how stupid he sounds. He needs to get on drugs again.
Maxwedge12000 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000
Lawrence O'Donnell on drugs?
Oh, you mean like that hypocrite, Rush Limbaugh on Oxycontin?
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@adamrosemead Rush WAS addicted to drugs, Larry odonnel should be as it might calm him so he could see things clearly. His anger blinds him to reality.
Maxwedge12000 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000
Are you saying that Rush Limbaugh sees things clearly?!
Was he seeing things "clearly" when, in 1988, he accused the Dems in Congress of "liberal hate speech" for criticizing Reagan's sale of poison gas components to Saddam that we knew were going to be used against Iraqi civilians?
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@adamrosemead I have knowledge the comments you are referring to. However I do think Rush see things of a political nature very clearly, much more so then kooky, angry odonnel.
Maxwedge12000 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000
Rush LImbaugh is popular because he tells the rubes what they want to hear.
He doesn't allow dissenting voices heard on his program. As soon as he realizes that a caller is unfriendly the call is cut off so that his listeners don't get to hear the other side.
Lefties like Thom Hartmann go out of their way to invite conservative personalities on his show to debate.
Even progressive comedy radio programs like Stephanie Miller take calls from conservatives.
Rush is chicken!!
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@adamrosemead Rush was very helpful in yesterdays GOP tsunami no matter what wild accusations you make against him. How did mad hatter odonnel do?
Maxwedge12000 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000
How come the truth is considered a "wild accusation" when describing conservative commentator's modus operandi?
What conservative commentator regularly debates liberals on the air?
The "tsunami" will go in the opposite direction in two years once the fickle electorate realizes that the Republicans really have NO economic plan other than to offer UNFUNDED tax cuts to their rich base while increasing the deficit.
That, and to ship more of our jobs overseas!!
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@adamrosemead "The "tsunami" will go in the opposite direction in two years..."
Wishful thinking on your part. With the GOP winning the majority of state governments and the control of redistricting, the GOP should increase their numbers in DC. Unless they completely fuck up like obama and his feckless supporters did.
Maxwedge12000 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000 Well they have a pretty good track record so far.
Turnback 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000
You must not have seen Republican politicians like Boehner, McConnell or Cantor hemming & hawing when asked that "gotcha" question:
"WHAT ARE GOING TO DO DIFFERENT NOW THAT YOU CONTROL CONGRESS THAN WHAT YOU DID THE LAST TIME WHEN YOU GOT US INTO THIS MESS?" The never can answer this question.
They tell u that they want to lower the deficit & be fiscally responsible while not being able to admit that the Bush tax cuts & eliminating the estate tax will explode the deficit!!
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@adamrosemead
yes so you have to cut spending its not a revenue problem its a spending problem
its not Republican vs Democrat its Austrian economics vs Keynesian economics
and both parties use Keynes theory of debt financing so no matter who you vote for the same policies will continue do to Philosophy
europa 1 year ago
@europa Sorry, but when you start to extol the virtues of any type of libertarian economic "plan" all I see is another person pushing for the onset of economic anarchy which will basically lead to the survival of the most ruthless at the expense of everyone else.
How can anyone believe that by removing the govt from the economic sphere will bring about anything but economic feudalism?
Left to their own devices would corporations have eliminated child labor on their own?
Of course NOT!
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@adamrosemead
because you have not educated your self on Libertarian principles of individual rights based on private property upheld by voluntary contracts.
A corporation cant force you to do anything UNLESS legislation through govt intervention provides corporations monopolies through taxation and regulation via Fascism-when corporations run the state
In a free market you vote with your sound money on whats good and bad if its bad it would go out of business or be forced to change
europa 1 year ago
@adamrosemead
watch Tom Woods( Harvard/Columbia Graduate New York Times best seller Meltdown
watch?v=541bajR4k8g
Austrian theory has predicted the first great Depression and the current and was awarded the Nobel prize to F.A. Hayek in 1979 for Austrian theory of business cycle, the boom and bust
Peter Schiff was right
watch?v=2I0QN-FYkpw
europa 1 year ago
@europa
You need to watch this to really get the perspective of a Libertarian and not the Myth of the selfish savage
The Philosophy of Liberty
watch?v=muHg86Mys7I
europa 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000
As a hard core lefty pinko, it's funny to see a faithful servant of capitalism, Obama, trying to prolong the existence of a dying system using accepted economic solutions (althought the stimulus was too small) while the Republicans are doing everything possible to prove that Karl Marx was right about how the capitalist ruling class' servants would try to use the power of the govt for the benefit of the monied classes without regard to how their policies hurt the economy!
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000
Rush is an imbecile GOP goon he is a talking head nothing more
Ron Paul 2012
europa 1 year ago
@europa Your comment proves you have never listened to him.
Maxwedge12000 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000
I have and he is a cheerleader/talking head for the GOP, blind to truth only GOP truth
so right now he's on board because Barry Soetoro is President, Bush did all the same things and he was for it, just like Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and so forth
its not D vs R its American/Constitutionalists vs Globalist
europa 1 year ago
@europa The GOP is more likely to be transformed into a constitutional party then the democrats would be. In fact, this past election is the first step in that transformation.
Maxwedge12000 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000
The Republicans wouldn't recognize the Constitution if it hit them on the head!
If the last Republican administration is any indication, our most sacred document is in serious jeopardy!
Bush regularly ignored the C whenever it suited his administration & sought to strenghten the executive at the expense of the other two branches of govt.
Reagan, the R's favorite pin up, intentionally ignored our govt's checks & balances by going behind Congress' back to back the Contras.
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@adamrosemead I don't disagree with you on that. The GOP has been very disappointing in regards to constitutional rights and fiscal responsibility. Obviously a lot of people get that which gave rise to the Tea party. I said I think the GOP is much more likely to be transformed into a constitutional party then the dems are. Which party does Ron Paul belong to? People like Ron Paul need help by have more people like him in DC and you won't find them in the left wing.
Maxwedge12000 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000
I know quite a few people who actually believe that Ron Paul's libertarian views would our national govt. I don't know why.
But apart from wanting to get laid & smoke pot what would libertarians bring to the national debate that might improve our overall well-being?
I see his Austrian economic beliefs making the corporate takeover of our country even more complete.
He seems to have little use for the federal govt. He sounds like Reagan on steroids.
Not a good thing
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@adamrosemead
If rich people/corporations would benefit from Libertarianism, then why didn't they back Ron Paul during his run in 2008? Why did Obama get a majority of the 250k + votes compared to McCain. Most of Ron Paul's support is grassroots/non-big business. Maybe a few people like the guy from Pay Pal support him, but the overwhelming majority of rich people back people like Obama you know, people that want BIG government. A corporation cannot exist without a big government.
MidNiteR32 1 year ago
@MidNiteR32
Obama is very much a corporate Dem, NOT the liberal socialist that Republicans like to portray. His policies have been intended to prolong a dying capitalist system.
Ron Paul's anti-war message would have turned off too many of his Republican backers to make him a viable candidate against Obama.
While corporatists may want a govt that protects their assets they are not as keen when govt is intent (& able) to prevent them from engaging in questionable profit making practices.
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@adamrosemead
Regardless of his anti-intervention platform, his principles and views on the market would, you think, have the Corporation right behind him during his Presidential, run but no, that wasn't the case. His money bombs have been nothing but ordinary citizen donations. Obama & McCain's contributions were nothing but fake "grassroots" - most money was donated by Corporations and other big businesses.
MidNiteR32 1 year ago
@MidNiteR32
I've never been so deluded as to think that Obama was a wild eyed idealist out to undue all of Bush's unintentional &/or corrupt practices.
But, if left to his prerogatives, he should be able to undue most of Bush's damage done to this country, economically & morally.
But I didn't vote for Obama as much as I voted against John McCain. That half-wit would have gotten us into a war with the Russkies by now.
His foreign affairs advisor was Randy Scheunnemann, a lobbyist for GEORGIA
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@MidNiteR32
Clueless conservatives often refer to Obama as a socialist out to destroy capitalism w/o knowing that two of his 1st three economic advisors were followers of Milton Friedman, the father of Reaganomics, or , as I prefer to call it, the Destruction of the Middle-class.
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000 Some of the more radical Republicans (or their spokespeople) have said that they might resort to violence whenever the results at the ballot box don't come out in their favor!!
How's that for respecting our democracy?
We libs have the ACLU to protect our constitutional rights & have a constitutional scholar in the office of the presidency.
What do the Republicans have besides talk when it comes to supporting our Constitution?
Some R's would eliminate the 14th Amend
adamrosemead 1 year ago
@adamrosemead "We libs have.....a constitutional scholar in the office of the presidency." That is the funniest thing I have read in quite some time.
Maxwedge12000 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000
Gee, Max, are going to tell me that someone who taught CONSTITUTIONAL LAW for TWELVE YEARS at the Univ of Chicago Law School is NOT a Constitutional scholar?
Who would you consider a Constitutional scholar then, Harriet Miers?
adamrosemead 1 year ago
Bill Cooper Assasinated over Exposing 911 Truth? <--look up that vid for the truth.
guanajuato1987 1 year ago
Not only is Liz Cheney a weak debater, she is also a lying scumbag. Lawrence O'donnell is NOT a 911 truther. He absolutely ravaged the lunatic he was facing.
seekisforme5 1 year ago
No one ever asks WHY did the terrorists wants to blow us up. Way to attack the symptoms.
bajoverga 1 year ago
Was Sadaam behind 911? NO HE WASN'T.
Neither was bush. How do we know bush wasn't behind 911?
BECAUSE IT WORKED AND IT INVOLVED PLANNING.
MrEatonbeaver 1 year ago
I love how Larry goes to eat these clowns !
deickos 1 year ago
Am I the only one who the irony isn't lost on? O'donnell makes the very same argument as the guest. The emphasis is government negligence = vulnerable to terrorism. The only difference is that the guest is making an assertion: it's conjecture. It may be true, but at present it is only that, while O'donnell is simply reviewing recent history, which just about everyone admits.
Yet O'donnell is the conspiracy nut? Carry forward your own logic. They have to BOTH be conspiracy nuts, right?
Neanderthalcouzin 1 year ago
The title's misleading. O'donnell was obviously talking about the exact same thing as the guest: government negligence. It's obviously ridiculous and hypocritical to accuse him of being a conspiracy theorist when he's citing the precise same negligence as the guest. You're purposefully misinterpreting it for people.
And it's a fucking joke that Scarborough calls the woman a 'Marxist' at the beginning of the clip. Come on, what's that about? It's fucktarded.
Neanderthalcouzin 1 year ago
It's pretty funny that Lawrence O'Donnell hates republicans so much but he acts just like Bill O'Reilly.
borstalboy1981 1 year ago
Lawrence is a schmuck, and this is why
thepax29 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't fuck with the LAWrence !