Has history been tampered with? First,Second,Third&Fourth Crusades=First World War of Troy

[saturnia22]

How are they going to explain things like...radio carbon dating when something shows up 1000 years old? dendricology? (tree rings), what about the ice cores in Antartica that provide proof of events that volcanoes erupted in the 5th century? For history books elsewhere, like the sagas of Norse legend? the Krishna, and Hindi records? Don't tell me the thousands of people (including the equipment used) were all wrong.

The only thing fabricated here is the idea. which amounts to a fairytale.

[TheLoyalOfficer]

This is one of the most retarded videos I have ever seen.

The record is off by 1900 years? Really???

[Mallachor]

present some of this "proof", and the papers where historians document this.

[Altiar1100]

If the Egyptians were mad up in the renaissance, then how did those big pyramids appear, or let me guess, the Italians sneaked them over the border. Our Saviour Jesus Christ was not crucified in 1053, that is blasphemy, there are plenty of records stating that there were popes well before that time, and you can have popes without Catholicism. You are just saying that this is true, because you don't have a 1000 year old witness to say that it isn't.

[templarrosco1]

This guy should channel his energies into something else, history clearly isnt his thing, lmao.

[deuntjes]

What if a mad russian mathematican writes books with over 600 pages filled with complete nonsense, and then makes the most hilarious video's trying to sell these to American consumers?

Thank you for making these vid's, they are sooo funny,

[EssedariusMaiestas]

long live the kuffaar.

-.-

[greycloud24]

when i want legal advise i go to a lawyer. when i am sick i go to a medical doctor. when my teeth hurt i go to a dentist. when i want to know about history i go to a historian. when i want to know about archeology i go to an archeologist, not a mathmatician.

i don't go to medical doctors for advise on laws. i don't go to dentists to fix my car and i don't go to mathmeematicians for my history.

"what if jesus christ was born in 1053?"

pfft this is crock of shit.

[squirrel4123]

That is a theory.

[PhillyKid07]

lol might be true....furthermore no one alive todays wasnt even around at least 150years ago to know the real truth loool

[12gaugeGLORY]

so this guy says that history is made up and shorter then we beleave but the crusades is accurate sounds like a scam 2me

[gulziibayar]

how about inventions? accomplishments? Yes you can deny records...But facts!!! How about paper? writing? steel? weapons? and all other great technologies? You cant deny your own existence. Invention of many great things are associated with great states. They cant simply be born to cavemen...e.g. Fire in Baghdad - Mongols - We know Mongols had the largest empire in the world because of the fact they burnt down the Baghdad.

[mesimeriaris]

Mithec's videos are as false and twisted as they could be but I really enjoyed watching them.Conspirasism can really be fun.If some people believe in a fairy tale,it aint the fairy tales's fault...

[italianchappy]

Absurd. Please read Viriglius' Aeneid, telling telling the mithical Roman history when survivors of Troy goes in Italy and their ancestors gave birth to Rome. All this well before Christ (and Mohammad a fortiori).

[italianchappy]

I see now from the other videos this author rewrites all classical chronology and all history. WOW. He has to convince the historical community first. If he succeed will be the greatest historical scoop of all times. Good luck.

[shooter1k]

Proganda

[spartanwarrior1]

denial of historical truth..there is no connection between ancient troy and the crusades...bullshit 100% and then some conceived by some sick individual.

[carlie9k]

The book will change your entire perception, but it will give you another wrong perception

[carlie9k]

another manipulation and distortion of the truth, so that we would go on a wild goose chase

[Guitibaca]

Talk about rewriting history. The Hebrew scholars and Spanish priests kept some of the most complete and accurate records in those early times. And somehow all of them missed the news that Jesus actually lived in 1053 AD? I guess the Spaniards really didn't know that Jesus was actually Hhe-Soosss, the tailor. You really would have to be a Bush supporter to believe that crap.

[jaewoovoodoo]

This is the most ridiculous and moronic idea I have ever heard. Just because we may lack a plethora of Western records of theis time period does not mean that we have none. There are records available from other areas of culture i.e. China to support a multi-millenial timeline of history.

This is really just farcical. And is that a Speak and Spell narrating?

[mithec]

Ancient China is a myth. The compilation of the so-called Ancient Chinese History is reliably datable to the XVII-XVIII century only. It is perfectly recognizable as the Ancient European history, reworked and transcribed in hieroglyphs as yet another historical transplantation, this time performed on the Chinese soil by the loving Jesuit hands.

[VendPrekmurec]

@mithec indeed...Chinese alphabet was derived from old "Hyperborean" (Daarian Slavic runes ) - the first northern Chinese rulers were white (Caucasian) - read about Chinese white mummies... also about Mesoamerican white mummies...

there was once a great empire, called Tartaria (still 5000 BC)

Later Chinese rulers compiled new alphabet (3 different types based on Daarian runes) and hide all traces of previous civilization or Aryan culture.

[jaZZjaZZ54]

mithec - man , you have chosen one tough life, if you plan to stick to defending this theory til death.

How do you explain that the Chinese timeline and the Western timeline, are in sync for several thousand years in regards to many astronomical observances?

BTW, Occam's razor has to be the worst device ever invented for argument - yet it would surely cut against your theory.

[mithec]

right.Terrific Ghengis et al.`Mongol` nomadic tribes were small, illiterate and scattered before 19th cy, in fact they even did not even know they were touted in Russia and Europe as great conquerors. Russian history as we know it today is a blatant forgery concocted by a host of German scientists brought to Russia by the usurper dynasty of the Romanovs, whose ascension to the throne was the result of conspiracy, charged with the mission of making their reign look legitimate.

[DrCroccer]

Second:if the Mongols were a Russian Kingdom then the Turks couldn't have existed, why not? Well,the Seljuk Turks were Mongolic Tribes who joined Temudjin,after the Golden Horde fell apart they became Islamic,defeat the Byzantines,Carve an empire,discover gunpowder.

[DrCroccer]

I see a few flaws in your Mongoltheory. First off:The word''Mongol''is a name for a unimportant clan in witch Temudjin was born.Later,when Temudjin united all of the Turkic and SteppeAsian tribes they were called the Mongols,in honour of Temudjins clan.

[mithec]

Occam razor cuts: Sapiens sapiens species <=150000 years old, civilization (state+army+ideology+writing) goes only as far back as AD 800, very scarce information from 8-10 cy AD events, most historical events took place in 10-15th cy AD. Jesus 1153-1186 AD. Old Testament compiled in 12-16 cy AD, AFTER New One, it renders events of that period. All methods of dating of artefacts, including c14 are non-exact and contradictory, there are no written ORIGINALS datable earlier than the XI century.

[VendPrekmurec]

@mithec yes old Testament was compiled in 11. century - AFTER the "new" one totally agree...

there was also in fact no "X" or IX ... (X = XPCT - Kristus - Christ) century AD at all...

all Yahwistic Jesuit OCCULT hoax

[discoskull]

This is the absolute stupidest thing I have ever seen guised as history. Read a fucking book. Never breed.

[mithec]

go to google>to `more`> to `book search`>type keyword `fomenko`, read TOC or the whole book for this matter and free of charge.

[mithec]

The history of humankind to be both dramatically different and drastically shorter than generally presumed. Archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artifacts are both non-exact and contradictory, therefore there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artifact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the XI century.

[AlaricRose]

What about the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Vatican Library, all of the Roman documents such as Caesar's writings and the sex manuals? Also, carbon dating is not accurate. If you burn something near an item that is to be carbon dated, the smoke adds carbon to an item, making it appear younger than it is.