1:04 guy is quoting Patton, that "we" would win this war with Sherman tank. That is so funny! Sorry, but more than 80% of destruction to the nazi germany was done by people of Soviet Union. If soviet lost the war by the end of 1941, by not being able to protect Moscow there would be only German language in all of Europe and both Americas by the end of 1940's. P.S. I'am not protecting soviet ideas, I actually hate communism and nazism, but I just saying who really won that war.
Hindsight is 20/20. Pretty easy to sit back and pick holes in the decisions made at the time. This is a slanted one sided view. The Sherman was a good tank for what it was designed for. It was not , and never was meant ot be a tank killer. It was an infantry support vehlcle. It was a Match for the German PZIII, but was totally outclassed by the Panther and Tigers. Allied Air power took care of those. From the moment these Shermans hit the shores, the Germans were in retreat,
@BARCHOBBY you are right about the infantry part. US doctrine said that the Tank Destroyer was meant for Tank v tank combat. the problem was the allies only had 2 tanks or tank destroyers that could engage german armor effectively at any range. (not counting the pershing, it was too late). The M 36 slugger and the Sherman firefly. US tank crews used to put sand bags and concrete on these tanks to try and live. The generals were asses and brave men paid with their lives
its amazing that throughout the war , the Germans even bombed could produce king tigers .
and the amis come up with this !? i admire all fighting man (especially the Germans from that time ,regardless of their war-crimes) and the Sherman is a good tank ,but really ?is this what you would call your main battle tank ? i am aware of the Jackson tank destroyer and the rest that can take on panthers and so-on, but this thing cant beat a panzer4, if you think i am wrong , please come up with a reply
Thanks a lot for the upload and the discription whats happend to the crews of both of the tanks. Sherman: 1 hit, 2 survive one lost a leg, 3 dead...Poor guys. War sucks
General Eisenhower said "Our men, in general, realize that the Sherman is not capable of standing up in a ding-dong, head-on fight with a Panther. Neither in gun power nor in armor is the present Sherman justified in undertaking such a contest" March, 1945.
Patton´s head were at the colt revolver and horse infantry times . At the end of war this dubious american said US fought against the wrong enemy. Disgusting.
Brave German up against American aggressor;in next war China will join force with Russia to liberate all Nations suppressed by US tyranny and colonial oppression.
From 2008 onward, US is in rapid deline and soon it will be wipe off from map and occupied by China.
@fgah chic fag, you say this shit but you live in canada."brave germans up against US aggressor"? germany declared on the US."China will join force with Russia to liberate all Nations suppressed by US tyranny " yeah from georgia to tibet.
Bless those poor american tankers! The Sherman realy was a deathtrap :/ But i hate it how at the end they fired a second shot at the escaping Panther crew and killed the gunner who tried to climb out. War sucks...
the sherman was a shit tank
kevinkards1 3 days ago
1:04 guy is quoting Patton, that "we" would win this war with Sherman tank. That is so funny! Sorry, but more than 80% of destruction to the nazi germany was done by people of Soviet Union. If soviet lost the war by the end of 1941, by not being able to protect Moscow there would be only German language in all of Europe and both Americas by the end of 1940's. P.S. I'am not protecting soviet ideas, I actually hate communism and nazism, but I just saying who really won that war.
VIOLATOR871 2 weeks ago
That just made me sad for the week.
I guess great-grandpa was the 18th tank out of the 17 that got hit when they went into battle.
That poor commander.
MP40MayShootBullets 1 month ago
Hindsight is 20/20. Pretty easy to sit back and pick holes in the decisions made at the time. This is a slanted one sided view. The Sherman was a good tank for what it was designed for. It was not , and never was meant ot be a tank killer. It was an infantry support vehlcle. It was a Match for the German PZIII, but was totally outclassed by the Panther and Tigers. Allied Air power took care of those. From the moment these Shermans hit the shores, the Germans were in retreat,
BARCHOBBY 2 months ago
@BARCHOBBY you are right about the infantry part. US doctrine said that the Tank Destroyer was meant for Tank v tank combat. the problem was the allies only had 2 tanks or tank destroyers that could engage german armor effectively at any range. (not counting the pershing, it was too late). The M 36 slugger and the Sherman firefly. US tank crews used to put sand bags and concrete on these tanks to try and live. The generals were asses and brave men paid with their lives
faheem65asss 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos 5
its amazing that throughout the war , the Germans even bombed could produce king tigers .
and the amis come up with this !? i admire all fighting man (especially the Germans from that time ,regardless of their war-crimes) and the Sherman is a good tank ,but really ?is this what you would call your main battle tank ? i am aware of the Jackson tank destroyer and the rest that can take on panthers and so-on, but this thing cant beat a panzer4, if you think i am wrong , please come up with a reply
gijsiescudda 3 months ago 3
@gijsiescudda
you sire, are right.
loocsiyeltsakcir 3 weeks ago
@gijsiescudda
the following vehicles could annihilated shermans in a 10:1 ratio as well..
is-2
isu-152
isu-122
king tiger
jagdtiger
jagdpanther
loocsiyeltsakcir 3 weeks ago
Thanks a lot for the upload and the discription whats happend to the crews of both of the tanks. Sherman: 1 hit, 2 survive one lost a leg, 3 dead...Poor guys. War sucks
kleofaz 3 months ago
Another great upload... really enjoying your channel
etzel33 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
General Eisenhower said "Our men, in general, realize that the Sherman is not capable of standing up in a ding-dong, head-on fight with a Panther. Neither in gun power nor in armor is the present Sherman justified in undertaking such a contest" March, 1945.
hailherrosner 3 months ago
Amazing footage in the end
ModelloursWorkshop 4 months ago
Patton´s head were at the colt revolver and horse infantry times . At the end of war this dubious american said US fought against the wrong enemy. Disgusting.
miguelmouta 4 months ago
Brave German up against American aggressor;in next war China will join force with Russia to liberate all Nations suppressed by US tyranny and colonial oppression.
From 2008 onward, US is in rapid deline and soon it will be wipe off from map and occupied by China.
fgah 4 months ago
@fgah Fuck you jagoff....
prg1972a 2 months ago
@fgah chic fag, you say this shit but you live in canada."brave germans up against US aggressor"? germany declared on the US."China will join force with Russia to liberate all Nations suppressed by US tyranny " yeah from georgia to tibet.
badgerattoadhall 2 months ago
was the panther gunner killed in the second hit. He was only referenced in one frame and not again after that.
psgchisolm 4 months ago
T-34 is better than Sherman ?
geforce5700fx 5 months ago
The sherman is the victim of the flawed US concept of tanks deal with soft targets and support infantry while D would deal with enemy armour.
Dreachon 5 months ago
Bless those poor american tankers! The Sherman realy was a deathtrap :/ But i hate it how at the end they fired a second shot at the escaping Panther crew and killed the gunner who tried to climb out. War sucks...
Qirex2097 5 months ago
For the Germans was this tank the "anklopfer"
TheGermanHonor 5 months ago