Actually, it is the mis-management by the Elite governors of resources that has led to this problem not over population. Scientists have long said, in fact, that if managed correctly, our earth could sustain upwards of 20 billion people and every man woman and child would own 1 acre of land! Think about that; but power mongering greed and mis-management has led to the gross unbalance of resources and our simple ability to feed ourselves. Don't buy the UN and Globalist fear mongering BS!
Yeah... would have given this an F... half of it isn't about over population. Also, how does combating disease and sickness cure over population? It contributes to it.
Can't you even tell the difference between good and bad? Of course cure disease. The perverse "lifeboat ethic" says we aren't supposed to care about other people. Surely that proves it is from the liar devil? So it says, if we help people by giving (or selling) them food and medicine, infant mortality decreases, longevity increase, and people are encouraged to have more children. Which supposedly worsens overpopulation. But I already advocate a denser world, and naturally high birthrates
And why can't we adapt to fit more people? Of course we can.
Some motivation posters I saw long ago, said Those who say it can't be done, are often interrupted by those doing it.
How can parents continue enjoying having their precious darling babies, or all the children God gives, on a world with so many people alive already? The planet obviously isn't getting any bigger as human populations naturally grow. Isn't it obvious? By world growing denser, all the people can easily fit.
@pronatalist Ah, pronatalist. Long time no read. It's not so much space that concerns me anymore; it's more of the demand for material. How much will we have to mine and cut to build, and where will the water come from? Pretty difficult to deny our aquifers, which supply a lot of the water in arid lands for agriculture, are being depleted faster than they can regenerate, etc.
Oh but resources aren't the problem really either. Notice we humans keep finding more? Who's really trying to manufacture phony shortages? The "environmentalists" who claim that they are worried about running out, try to deny needed development and resources.
I agree with China mining more coal, and their building of another coal-fired power plant or 3, per week. And agree with building housing, and water dam projects. But they need to accept their so many people need BIG families
I want for China to accept, let the people enjoy having their traditionally very large families, and populate the land denser and denser. Build more cities, or more new towns, whatever is needed to make way for people to go on having their precious darling babies.
I told some guy in some forum somewhere, he claimed to be Chinese, I don't expect China to reign in their burgeoning population, but we should be eager to fill world far denser so everybody can have their natural babies.
Actually, it is the mis-management by the Elite governors of resources that has led to this problem not over population. Scientists have long said, in fact, that if managed correctly, our earth could sustain upwards of 20 billion people and every man woman and child would own 1 acre of land! Think about that; but power mongering greed and mis-management has led to the gross unbalance of resources and our simple ability to feed ourselves. Don't buy the UN and Globalist fear mongering BS!
timo092601 1 year ago 2
Yeah... would have given this an F... half of it isn't about over population. Also, how does combating disease and sickness cure over population? It contributes to it.
Third, most if it isn't practical.
adcsb 1 year ago
@adcsb
Can't you even tell the difference between good and bad? Of course cure disease. The perverse "lifeboat ethic" says we aren't supposed to care about other people. Surely that proves it is from the liar devil? So it says, if we help people by giving (or selling) them food and medicine, infant mortality decreases, longevity increase, and people are encouraged to have more children. Which supposedly worsens overpopulation. But I already advocate a denser world, and naturally high birthrates
pronatalist 1 year ago
Seriously. We can't continue adapting to fit more people all the time. It won't work.
fyrefox4289 2 years ago 2
@fyrefox4289
And why can't we adapt to fit more people? Of course we can.
Some motivation posters I saw long ago, said Those who say it can't be done, are often interrupted by those doing it.
How can parents continue enjoying having their precious darling babies, or all the children God gives, on a world with so many people alive already? The planet obviously isn't getting any bigger as human populations naturally grow. Isn't it obvious? By world growing denser, all the people can easily fit.
pronatalist 1 year ago
@pronatalist Ah, pronatalist. Long time no read. It's not so much space that concerns me anymore; it's more of the demand for material. How much will we have to mine and cut to build, and where will the water come from? Pretty difficult to deny our aquifers, which supply a lot of the water in arid lands for agriculture, are being depleted faster than they can regenerate, etc.
fyrefox4289 1 year ago
@fyrefox4289
Oh but resources aren't the problem really either. Notice we humans keep finding more? Who's really trying to manufacture phony shortages? The "environmentalists" who claim that they are worried about running out, try to deny needed development and resources.
I agree with China mining more coal, and their building of another coal-fired power plant or 3, per week. And agree with building housing, and water dam projects. But they need to accept their so many people need BIG families
pronatalist 1 year ago
@fyrefox4289
I want for China to accept, let the people enjoy having their traditionally very large families, and populate the land denser and denser. Build more cities, or more new towns, whatever is needed to make way for people to go on having their precious darling babies.
I told some guy in some forum somewhere, he claimed to be Chinese, I don't expect China to reign in their burgeoning population, but we should be eager to fill world far denser so everybody can have their natural babies.
pronatalist 1 year ago