Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
In case you were wondering why a circular argument is logical fallacy, here is definition of what a circular argument is:" Arguing in a circle is first using a premiss to prove a conclusion, and then using the conclusion to prove the premiss. For example: These facts are true because they are in F 's Diary.
F 's Diary is true because it contains these facts". I got the example on definition online.
3li3z3r1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
** Do you think the mere assertion that my argument is circular is enough to demonstrate that I am wrong?* *I'm not asserting, Its right on your video, your argument is circular, Bible says God exist, God says the bible is true, it doesn't get any more circular than that. Circular arguments are logical fallacy, It doesn't prove you are wrong but it disproves the ONLY piece of evidence you used. Meaning all four vid combine carry 0 evidence.
3li3z3r1 1 year ago
The only "proof" you provided was a circular argument. your argument is based on assumptions and flawed logic.Watch this video to understand why you wont listen to reply watch?v=XyOHJa5Vj5Y. If you want to see a logical argument for any type a god with good, sound logic, then read "the age of reason." And if you really want to argue for Christianity start by taking on people like Thunderf00t, zomgitscriss, edwardcurrent and/or qualiasoup. They all put forth amazing logical arguments.
3li3z3r1 1 year ago
@3li3z3r1 Well I watched the video on Dunning-Kruger. Thank you it was fascinating and I subscribed to that guys channel. Perhaps it means that I am incompetent, but I do not see what it has to do with my Case fro Christianity videos. Do you think the mere assertion that my argument is circular is enough to demonstrate that I am wrong? That level of reasoning just won't cut it. Please demonstrate how my argument is circular.
robvandjdk 1 year ago
Wow, I can't believe I painfully watch the first 4 videos of this series to find out that the evidence you were providing was nothing more than a circular argument. I just want to say, your videos are full of logical fallacy, assumptions and flawed reasoning. Any high school grad can take apart arguments, but i doubt you would listen. take a look at this video watch?v=XyOHJa5Vj5Y.
3li3z3r1 1 year ago
@3li3z3r1 As for taking on Thunderfoot or the Babe from Romania, I have intended to for quite some time. The problem is that I know that they have a number of different arguments at their disposal and I have to make videos refuting all of them before I get into a You Tube shoot out. One can easily imagine them making a video with a shotgun blast of arguments each one of which would take me 2 or 3 10 minute videos to refute and I want to have those videos done before I begin. Stay tuned.
robvandjdk 1 year ago