Added: 4 years ago
From: RachmaninoffGuy
Views: 54,827
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • My fingers are injured by this piece.

  • This is actually no 9, not 8. But I did enjoy this performance very frantic in a cool way.

  • OMG!!!!!!!!! This peice is beautiful. Listen to how he created cords that almost sound as if an orchestra is in the background at 1:08. Those are beautiful. They are so full....Its....the type of music I always day dream of. This peice is like a dream. Is so complex! Its amazing!

  • The ending was like ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh­hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh­hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh­hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh­hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh­hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh­hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh­hhhhhh done witht his hellish piece

  • It's no 9 since there's no no 4, so they move from there one up

  • What a great ending

  • This is not No.8. I think its No.9

    No.8 is in G minor.

  • wow very nice

  • frammenti di qualcosa.. di immenso

  • I don't think you got carried away at all. I, in fact, very much enjoyed your interpretation. BRAVO!

  • very good interpretation!!!!!!!

    the jealous here just have to say make it better if you can.....

  • Sorry, I didn't like it... This piece is full of emotion but the interpretation reminds me of a factory.

  • This is 9 not 8

  • parece k le cuesta

  • Comment removed

  • Wow, your rachmaninoff is great!

  • This piece could be op.33 - 9 not - 8

  • in my book its 8 too :/ is 8 in g minor, not in here, but it should be :/

  • I don't believe this is Etude-tableau op.33 no. 3. I play that one and it's in G minor.

  • correction: op. 33 no. 8

  • My bad. The one in G minor is no. 7. Actually it's the Royal Conservatory of Music's fault. Gosh I wish youtube would let me delete my comments...

  • Rachmaninoff's Op. 33 has numbering ambiguity issues due to pieces being added to the opus posthumously. I've seen this etude listed as No. 6 and also as No. 9. But the modern standard complete set of Op. 33 etudes has eight and this is the last one.

  • Well, I also play the g minor one (badly) and I did find this video by looking for it. Makes me wonder if that c sharp minor prelude I play is actually Op. 3 No. 2...

  • I hope that means I can play this for the ARCT exam. (Sorry for the late response.)

  • man, you're 15 and already that arrogant.

  • "LuvHipHopTilliDie", You like Evgeny Kissin's La Campanella. That officially means your musical opinion carries no weight whatsoever.

  • What!?!?!

    Rachmaninoff desides how it should be played, not you... -.-

  • @addeex1 Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Rachmaninoff allow some individuality in interpretation?

  • @LuvHipHopTilliDie You say you can play it better

    So, why don`t you show us your talent playing this etude?

    If you`re that arrogant to critizise other performances , please show us how good you`re , instead of explaining us how the fuck this performance is so bad

  • Awesome

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more