Carnotaur if you the chameleonic beasts from TLW novel. Taurus is latin for bull. Meat bull aka Carnotaurus. And I agree, these things were lacking from TLW assumably because a real Carnotaurus had no camouflage. Doesn't matter in the JP world with genetic engineering. So they wasted a good potential for TLW movie.
I guess you COULD say the JP3 raptors were evolved, but then it would be easier to juat call them a different form of raptor, like Troodon or Utahraptor.
@zmbklr101 The Raptors seen in all three movies are technically Deinonychus. Once again, in the genetic engineering driven plot accuracy is no reason to retcon an earlier continuity just because something has no feathers. Make the feathered ones fight the old reptilian form I say!
@Querpecoman Then we should have had feathered Raptors back during Lost World because in that movie there are both genders and neither have feathers. It's all assumption really as there never was an in-universe explanation but to me it's another pack of Raptors that got more avian traits during their creation. In JP4 we will most likely have even more different Raptors.
A mere scientific switch doesn't explain a change in the movies. The original types existed, no matter how inaccurate.
i make that same piont on the raptors, i hate it when they do that, dont change it keep it the same like the first one. oh don't forget the T-rex, it when to a dark brown blackish gray color to shades of green!
@dragonsnakes The lost world has both brown and green types in the form of the parent Rexes. Neither of those had feathers. The infant was planned to be given them at one point by Stan Winston's studio but for some reason they felt it would be too difficult.
@JParkL0v3r As they are genetically engineered the dinosaurs can not possibly be fully like their prehistoric counterparts. If you read the novel chapter Version 4.0 it basically states through Wu's dialog that the park's dinosaurs are made after flawed understanding and public appeal, not true accuracy. If this were to be respected by the film-makers more than it is it wouldn't be such a big deal if feathers exist as they can just be one number batch among the rest.
@Dinoslay thats only and excuse to why the info is potrayed incorrectly. They made the T-rex motion sighted claim seem like an actual fact about the dinosaur rather then a deformity. The only reason featherless raptors pass is because they feather claim came out after the movie did.
Just using the different dinosaur aesthetics as an element is plenty enough to build a story around. Wonder why there's so many different Raptors? Well, there's your story.
@IfinduIgetu I respect the sequels as their own thing but feel appalled by how they fail to supplement the first JP. Site B is an interesting setup that especially The Lost World turns to a mere company warehouse. The novel version handled it more interestingly. Jurassic Park 3 is merely more padding to that. Both sequels I feel are also too bloated in scale to really compare to the more relatable down-to-earth scale of JP1 which also made it more terrifying. Just my humble opinion.
I think they changed the raptors due to scientific evidence of raptors having feathers.Also there are more than one island and the third takes place on a seperate island.(isla Asorna) or (isla Nublar).Also over time they find out how to make or create new and more realistic props and graphics.
@Opposedhardline While they changed them they should have also explained why they're different to avoid a pointless retcon. Something as simple as the Raptor in Alan's dream being the original reptilian form. Poof! A problem no more. But they chose to go the inconsistent route which is very bothersome because it leaves the entire story canon to unstable ground to say the least. There's a REASON for why the JP dinosaurs are inaccurate in the films. Need evidence? Read the novel.
@IfinduIgetu Your joking rite because the gender didnt matter all velociraptors had feathers just due to the fact that the first one was older the wre able to add feathers in the old one.
@IfinduIgetu It's meant to be another version number of the same animal(at least to fan logic knowing the obscure canon has denied a true explanation) so the gender really doesn't mean anything. A different breed with quills in males until explained to be that or a retcon(lazy film-making is the most likely answer).
@Dinoslay well it kind of did because remember in the 3rd one the 1 that looked like the one from the first came in and it was the mom lol idk could be a genetic mutation in the molecular structure of the phosphate base 5 carbon sugar etc.
@zootigerbeast The feedback has indeed been really positive. Literally a sequel that Spielberg hasn't made. Here's hoping that he and the production team for any of the new movies take note in Telltale's effort. The story is the very definition to JP's success as a concept and if it is to succeed in the future the franchise must stay close to it's roots in what it wants to say.
@Dinoslay I agree with you 100%! I really hope the 4th film will respect the views of all the real Jurassic Park fans not just those people who are crazy about special effects! I'm really counting on Spielberg, I hope he doesn't mess this up.
Okay I've got some good news and I've got some bad news. The good news is Jack Horner says that the script is finished! The bad well...he says they they brought all the dinosaurs back, and wants to make them scarier. The answer more genetic tampering??? What do you think? Do you feel like a JP3 plot happening?
@DarthSmoke1 It does have a threatening implication back to Homocraptor but it could be Horner simply referring to the older script if it's all he knows about. That's my assumption. But even if they are going to tamper with the genes I still hope that it's kept within the boundary of what JP was built around(version numbers and Raptors changing looks). If you make dinosaurs into literal biological weapons it stops being unique and becomes a Sy-Fy Channel product. Already enough of those.
I think the Dilophosaurus was a juvenile and would lose the frill becoming an adult because in the novel, it's its real-life size and lacks the frill but still posses the venom.
@DarthSmoke1 I won't be assuming anything till I see them. With many cooks in the kitchen we can never be sure about what we get. But I trust that Telltale at least knows what they're doing.
@Dinoslay Well I just hope your threre in the videos are right. Because one way or another, this new trilogy is getting made! If Steven S. can make Indiana Jones 4, and George Lucas can make more Star Wars movies, I can see why a new trilogy can't be made, I mean why settle for just JP4 when we can have 3 new and last ones?
@DarthSmoke1 Depends. The story has to work to permit three movies. Like LOTR, they each should be connected so it won't feel like just padding whipped together to cash in on eager fans.
Gotta say man, wonderful videos, both parts. All your points are right on, and a fantastic film can be created here. Your said it perfectly about the spitters and raptors, neglectance... Great job man, with all the new news out, something may be finally coming into focus, let's hope it's what you say, a great a milestone as the first.
@TheVraptor37 To me the bottom line is that Jurassic Park always will be a great concept on it's own and any new movie that gets made should respect it. It's not about just CGI but what film-makers want to say and how audiences can associate.
If a story is good impressive effects can only enhance that. Without a good story the impressive effects simply don't matter. What made JP great was that it was believable both story and SFX wise. Nowadays it's just lazy computer work. Make it special!
i cant wait for the fourth film! Has anyone heard anything about the Dilophosaurs and the Carnotaurs appearing in it! I sure hope so oh and also they should bring back T-rex regardless if Horner says its a scavenger or not its bollocks to the first two if you change the animals instincts just for the sake of "a new animal" and spino sucks anyways. Malcolm should return definately, Sam Neil says no but its ok. im tired of that indiana jones wannabe. responses please this is great! awesome vid btw
also I think, they should do a prequal to the original showing how it all started,how they made the dinasours and all the problems they had, and how hammond decided to make the park anyways, it would tie in perfectly to the original specially when hammond realized he was in way over his head, and if they do decide to make a fourth one, I think it would be spectacular to see one where the park is actuallly functional, and see what would have happened if hammods dream would have actually come true
from one jurassic park fan to another, I apreciate your take on the franchise, and the posible sequal JP4, in my humble opinion, I wish they never would have made JP2 and 3, all the sequals were, just mindless dino action, and I think what made the first one so great and unforgettable, is the fact that it was also very interesting, the dialogue and the characters were intriging.
@Scandnn The concept works best in the original JP. The challenge is to make it last more than one film which is where the sequels were quite rushed products. Universal simply wanted to make more money with the brand name so they ushered Spielberg to ask Crichton to write a sequel which is what he had never done and never did afterwards. The fact that the movie "adaptation" was nothing like it's respective novel only adds to the insult at what I consider a concept undervalued by it's owners.
Steven Spielberg just confirmed Jurassic park 4 at Comic Con this year an said they do have a story and a writer, an that they hope to have it done in 2 or 3 years.
@XxComablackxX1937@Dinoslay Sure, but before we actually get something solid it's something that I just refuse to get worked up about as two years is a lot of time for fans to spend in other productive activity aside just waiting. The fandom doesn't run exclusively on the movies anymore but the concept itself, Jurassic Park as a concept exceeds it's movies. All it takes is for the fans to express their love more than one way.
@hotwhire Telltale Games has implemented Troodon to their story which I could easily see as a movie. It even takes inspiration from the novel. There's plenty of subjects that most of InGen's employees weren't aware of.
jack horner (or how ever u spell his name) is the most stupid palentologist ever and i heard in a video that he doesn even specialize in predetory carnivore and how can u think t-rex is a mere scavenger?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! just look at that thing!!
@moneyismagic2011 While his former theory may be absolute bollocks from evolutionary standpoint it doesn't make him stupid, just a bit too over ambitious to speculate about that species. T-rex may have gotten a little too much fame but it's physiology hints at an extreme adaptivity. It may not have been as active hunter as in JP but it still most likely was one bad mother that evolved to fit more than one food niche in it's time. An awesome animal for other words.
@moneyismagic2011 Not really so my statements can have assumptions in them. But I do use the work of real paleontologists as a starting point for my views regarding dinosaurs. There are much more factors in that science than I truly have understanding of but simply looking at the build of the skeleton tells quite a lot.
A perfect head with powerful jaws and legs suitable for uneven marsh terrain. I think T.rex was the ultimate form of opportunist. Compare it to a bear if you like.
I think they should give us something brand new, Like I think they should either take the characters and us to site. C, or go back to Site. A,(Isla Nublar) Or the Mainland.
@DarthSmoke1 Why dont they use an Allosaurus? It's ALREADY wrong that they consider T-rex being "Jurassic" when it lived FAR later in time then any arc of the Jurassic history. - 1 again.
I second your opinon dude! But if they go to a new island they should have a volcano. But we gotta cut Steven Spielburg and cast and crew some sluk they are going through bad times like every body else. Could you make another JP 4 video?
@DarthSmoke1 I pretty much covered the most central problems with JP4 so there isn't much else to address save maybe for plot ideas.
I agree about everyone having hard times but it doesn't mean that people in the movie business can't communicate with their fans more reliably. It doesn't take a decade to give a definitive answer instead of endlessly cycling "Yes-No" gibberish. It isn't the fact that they aren't making a movie as of now but how they've kept covering up things from us.
It has been explained that on Isla Nublar, the reason the raptors were more "basic" was that they were far more engineered and perfected. They were essentiall lab rats, mutants. After Lost world and beginning with JP3, the raptors have been breeding for a long time now, and now they're starting to return to their more natural roots.
The Nublar raptors were attempts to be "theme park friendly".
@Dilo22 Another possibility is that the "Nubies" were a later version and the JP3 versions are an earlier breed. If the scientists assumed the feathers to be a defect they'd change the dinosaurs to look more like the scientific "accuracy" of the 80'th decade. The goof in JP3 is that it pretty much ignores the original versions almost as if they wanted to make the audience believe that Raptors were always feathery in film continuity. It's quite inconsistent.
@Dinoslay Yeah that's another one I read about. Both make sense and fit. But yeah I assume you mean how in his nightmare he saw the JP3 raptor on the plane rather than the JP1 ones. Makes no sense cause he's never even BEEN to Sorna yet!
Though I think the third was the worst movie, story wise, it does present a lot of opportunities for the sequel, considering all the changes it made. They could try answering questions like "Where did Spino come from," or "Why do the raptors look different" and "what will the pteranodons do?" That would make for an interesting story. In my opinion, the best sequels generally emerge from the consequences of their prequels.
@baryonyx550 I think so too, there's a better sense of interaction between each story that way, like a bridge. If you build a bridge out of padding or make it too complicated the bridge itself won't hold. Keep what made the concept good to begin with and supplement it instead of just throwing it to the trash.
Michael would be ashamed at this! if he did make a 3rd book and more the would be better. But I think its unfair that there isn't a 4th film because in the 3rd film the T-Rex (the boss) got killed off by the Spinosaurus! I want the 4th film to come out because I want the series to be redeemed and see the T-Rex kick the spinosaurs butt!! And also have one of my favorite dinos the Allosaurus be in it but not REPLACE the rex like the Spino.
you know back when i heard about the "human raptors" i flipped out and was ranting all over the place but now that ive seen their design i would have no problem with it if it was like in a hidden genetics lab by ingen's rival biosyn or something. that might sound bad but like a 30 sec cameo wouldnt be bad...especially if the story warranted it with a heavy plot on anticloning. i agree 100% with the dilophosaurus needing to be in the fourth way more and seriously we need trex regardless
@theguy782 I'm not sure. Even as an experiment that is easily devoured by a true Velociraptor in a BioSyn conducted "endurance experiment", it still would feel insulting to Crichton's work let alone isn't a dinosaur anymore.
Dilophosaurus has had bigger potential than it were given. Even the first movie downscaled it for a supposed comedy effect. That scene could have been funny with a large version too if they did it accordingly. The book interpretation of Nedry's death is quite dark.
@HaZrDSinner Depends on their focus. If they only give us bogus padding you're absolutely right. But if the story actually supports the original movie in moral focus besides entertaining it's worth doing. But it's all in the studio's hands really. You can't have a movie without a script and the script isn't any good you're better off not promising anything to begin with.
@FTWMoonwalker It is indeed terribly incoherent and no excuse from the film-makers can counter that. But the scene does have a saving grace in that it happens in Alan's head thus it doesn't necessarily have to mean anything as it's a dream. It still seems way too convenient and takes a little bit of the seriousness away from the creatures. We aren't meant to know the feathered types beforehand as we never met them before. So why is the one in the dream a plain copy of the ones to come?
@JParkL0v3r It's an otherwise good idea but this rant was specifically about the endless loop of the fourth movie and a few creative issues related to it which is why the other films have anything to do with it. We don't know if the Pteranodons have a part in IV.
Why not try and make one yourself? The fandom needs as many civilized opinions as possible. According to some people here my accent isn't the best type but that didn't stop me from doing this. Hop in, the more the merrier. :)
@la12muerta In the movies that doesn't matter that they're huge, they're basically Deinonychus that people call Velociraptors. At one point Deinonychus was called "Velociraptor antirrhopus". That basically makes the JP Raptors an exaggerated Deinonychus.
I have to say that I always found it odd that they made the raptors huge, shouldn't they be about the size of a turkey? Jurassic Park 4 should try to show a more realistic impression of dinosaurs and there are so many dinosaurs to choose from!
Good video, but there is one error, but it's understandable. At 0:42 , it does show the male raptor from the third film, however, while I was listening to the commentary of JP3, the filmmakers stated that they knew that this was an issue since Allan Grant has never seen those particular raptors, so they said they tried their best to make it appear to look like the originals by lightening. They were in no way trying to replace those raptors from the first and second movie.
@mesozoicisland22 Yes, I've heard that commentary as well. However, they could have easily avoided the confusion by digitally removing the quills and tweaking the eyes to look more cat-like. Instead we have clear traits of the new male Raptor which is easily seen in the shot. So why didn't they do it when it was easily within their grasp let alone affordable without using a separate classic puppet? Go figure. As it is it now has to be explained by other means.
@MISTGORILLA Yes, mostly fish plus a little bit of other meat. Tackling other large dinosaurs may not have been as practical as it were to theropods like, say, Allosaurus(or T-Rex). All theropods were opportunists in a sense so smaller species wouldn't have been too challenging prey to Spinosaurs. But it's size is mostly for intimidation and not true hunting.
@solidvipersnake It sure was though was it necessary? The more the merrier and they could have somehow re-used the old Dilo animatronic if only in a cameo. The baby Trike has a cameo if you recall and that was never in the first movie.
my question over the sequel is why is the smartest reptile confirmed as raptors? Because so far, the smartest dino ever known is Troodon (although it IS a same kind with raptors). Velociraptor was only a two-three kind pack hunter with a turkey-sized body, while Troodon can count 1+1 if we train them
I have to be honest and say that I have allready seen the first move about 400 times, and thats because when i see the movie, i can feel fear of the dinosaures, and when i feel this i feel like i`m alone. and when im alone i feel helpless and the first movei got me into that feelign. in the fourth movie there are gonna be cars ,fbi,police,city, and that just totally sucks!! That is not Jurassic Park
I am so fuckung agree with you, the first movie was the best, and then number 2 i think is the nuber two best, and the number three the badest movie. the new movie is going to be in town, the whole town/city feeling is not fitting into JP so i dont think the fourth movie is gonna be better than the first one.
@elyasf Honestly, my fave was the third because it's the most scientific of all (it has the latest scientific background than the other two) like the raptors had feathers by then and the Spinosaurus was greater than T. rex in ways (except brainpower). But it still misspelled Spinosaurus as 'Spinosaurus aegypticus' (it should be 'aegyptiacus')
@Dinoslay wait, how much jaw power does Spino had? Bcoz far as I recall Rexy had 4 tons. I believe Spino must have about the same, but it is logical if Spino had less, it has longer and narrower jaws...but who knew? No one conduct an experiment on it yet...or has there been?
@alfredwellf As of now no force test have been made with the jaws of Spinosaurus although the delicate design hints at specialized feeding. It is enough to kill smaller scale(think about human size) dinosaurs and animals aside fish. But I think the claws are the general offense against larger foe. Wouldn't want to be punched by those.
@Bahamut84 John Sayles seemingly did but it didn't really make sense for it to be utilized in the "Homocraptor" story because the embryos wouldn't survive longer than one day in the mud thus they'd be gone by the time it got dug out, probably even contaminated by each other if there still were anything. It's much more productive for the antagonists to get live specimen to clone from than some old stale embryo scraps.
@KYLEZ0R09 I agree about the first movie, in it the mesh model versions move like they actually interact with the scenery let alone were blended there smartly. The sequels blow it all out of proportion in an attempt to "outdo" the original without adding anything to that original film. Good sequels bond with the first part to flesh out it's meaning whereas bad sequels only play as a dirty trick to cash in on it's success. The JP sequels are junk, plain and simple.
Not sure of anything benefitial to the fourth film. There is the fandom-made novel called Emergence which attempts to bridge the gap between the original and it's continuation by at least taking a better look at the genetic engineering which the franchise was supposed to be built on as an ethical tale.
Thanks Dinoslayer for making this vids. concerning RAPTORS: in JP Trespasser Hammond states:"a third tribe of raptors took the mounthain for their territory, a leaner and thougher breed,". This can be the JP3 raptor version. Because they were the thougher tribe, and the island very small, it's most likely that this thougher breed filled the entire niche after 10 years. DILOPHOSAUR should indeed return. And I also want to see more SCIENCE. Malcolms algoritms from the novels would be nice.
Also, I forgot to say this, but some inaccuracies are forgivable. Like you said with the older form of velociraptor, you can't cancel out the first movie's inaccuracies, and I believe it is more important to keep with canon. Since Michael Crichton's novels don't go up to JP3 and because of the differences, the movies seem to have their own canon. Personally, I like the fact that spitter was reduced in size, it makes it seem like a cobra.
So in the first movie, Spielberg seems to have covered all of out land animal fears. Big powerful predator (T.Rex), a serial killer (velociraptor) and a smaller, venomous creature (Dilophosaurus). It also have a variety of dinosaur interactions, not just carnivores attacking people. There was T.Rex hunting, Brachiosaurus browsing, and a flock of Galimimus. That's why the first one was so great, it wasn't just about the carnivores.
Really, who cares if there's scaly Raptors aside the feathered ones. The more the merrier. Same with Dilophosaurus, have young juveniles like in the original movie and adults with smaller crests and no neck cowl while still retaining the spitting ability. I mean, it's a no brainer! Why make it all so damned incosistent? I doubt a budget would be a limitation unless they use most of it to buy Dr.Pepper. Does the majority of it even go to the special effects?
And why update the velociraptors in the first place? Why should the fossil record matter if the animals in Jurassic Park are all just genetic freaks anyway? Seriously, I hate the feathered raptors. Anyway, great video. 7/5!
Also remember that while they may be genetically modified they still are animals in a sense and not monsters. InGen breeding different versions is not unrealistic when compared to the "Homocraptors" that are total make-believe science. This is what makes JP work. So why ignore that?
I'd have to say the Jurassic Park 3 Spinosaur pushes the envelope on that. As well as the raptors, who do some very unanimal things towards the end. Like follow them from inland, down a waterfall and cut them off from the shore that they magically knew the humans would be headed to. But still, my point was that the dinosaurs of Jurassic Park aren't the dinosaurs that lived 65 million years ago.
Yes, they do but then again Jurassic Park 3 is quite a step away from what Spielberg wished them to appear like. They're not human exterminators, just dangerous predators. Only the Raptors have the capacity of hunting humans for fun.
I completely agree with this, especially the raptors and dilophosaurus. I've just started reading the novel, so I haven;t gotten very far, but I'm pretty sure that it would be unfair to ask for the entire book to be crammed into a movie, that being said, at least the first movie did have some thought provoking dialogue and could be analyzed for symbolism, especially the last scene where Grant sees the birds outside the copter.
It appears that the outrageous machine driven crap here has associated the first part of my video with NBC from visual content thus it cannot be embedded to other sites. Total BS. >:-(
Carnotaur if you the chameleonic beasts from TLW novel. Taurus is latin for bull. Meat bull aka Carnotaurus. And I agree, these things were lacking from TLW assumably because a real Carnotaurus had no camouflage. Doesn't matter in the JP world with genetic engineering. So they wasted a good potential for TLW movie.
Dinoslay 1 month ago
Ih and if there IS a JP4, NEEDS MOAR CARNOSAUR!!!
zmbklr101 1 month ago
I guess you COULD say the JP3 raptors were evolved, but then it would be easier to juat call them a different form of raptor, like Troodon or Utahraptor.
zmbklr101 1 month ago
@zmbklr101 The Raptors seen in all three movies are technically Deinonychus. Once again, in the genetic engineering driven plot accuracy is no reason to retcon an earlier continuity just because something has no feathers. Make the feathered ones fight the old reptilian form I say!
Dinoslay 1 month ago
They should just say those raptors are Deinonychus,or trodon. (which they technically were)
hotwhire 1 month ago
@Querpecoman Then we should have had feathered Raptors back during Lost World because in that movie there are both genders and neither have feathers. It's all assumption really as there never was an in-universe explanation but to me it's another pack of Raptors that got more avian traits during their creation. In JP4 we will most likely have even more different Raptors.
A mere scientific switch doesn't explain a change in the movies. The original types existed, no matter how inaccurate.
Dinoslay 1 month ago
i make that same piont on the raptors, i hate it when they do that, dont change it keep it the same like the first one. oh don't forget the T-rex, it when to a dark brown blackish gray color to shades of green!
dragonsnakes 1 month ago
@dragonsnakes both brown and green t-rexes existed at the same time. brown ones were female and green ones were male
JParkL0v3r 3 weeks ago
@dragonsnakes The lost world has both brown and green types in the form of the parent Rexes. Neither of those had feathers. The infant was planned to be given them at one point by Stan Winston's studio but for some reason they felt it would be too difficult.
Dinoslay 3 weeks ago
What does "Even the inaccuracy makes sense!" mean?
JParkL0v3r 1 month ago
@JParkL0v3r As they are genetically engineered the dinosaurs can not possibly be fully like their prehistoric counterparts. If you read the novel chapter Version 4.0 it basically states through Wu's dialog that the park's dinosaurs are made after flawed understanding and public appeal, not true accuracy. If this were to be respected by the film-makers more than it is it wouldn't be such a big deal if feathers exist as they can just be one number batch among the rest.
Dinoslay 1 month ago
@Dinoslay I guess that makes sense since the gene sequence gaps in the DNA strand was filled with frog DNA which to me is considered a mutation
JParkL0v3r 1 month ago
@Dinoslay thats only and excuse to why the info is potrayed incorrectly. They made the T-rex motion sighted claim seem like an actual fact about the dinosaur rather then a deformity. The only reason featherless raptors pass is because they feather claim came out after the movie did.
hotwhire 1 month ago
Just using the different dinosaur aesthetics as an element is plenty enough to build a story around. Wonder why there's so many different Raptors? Well, there's your story.
Dinoslay 2 months ago
Well what should we do now? They said that their going to make it, but there's no script or ideas for it? What do you suggest?
DarthSmoke1 2 months ago
Don't talk crap about the othere jurassic parks I am the biggest JP fan and every JP is the best!
IfinduIgetu 2 months ago
@IfinduIgetu I respect the sequels as their own thing but feel appalled by how they fail to supplement the first JP. Site B is an interesting setup that especially The Lost World turns to a mere company warehouse. The novel version handled it more interestingly. Jurassic Park 3 is merely more padding to that. Both sequels I feel are also too bloated in scale to really compare to the more relatable down-to-earth scale of JP1 which also made it more terrifying. Just my humble opinion.
Dinoslay 2 months ago
I think they changed the raptors due to scientific evidence of raptors having feathers.Also there are more than one island and the third takes place on a seperate island.(isla Asorna) or (isla Nublar).Also over time they find out how to make or create new and more realistic props and graphics.
Opposedhardline 2 months ago
@Opposedhardline While they changed them they should have also explained why they're different to avoid a pointless retcon. Something as simple as the Raptor in Alan's dream being the original reptilian form. Poof! A problem no more. But they chose to go the inconsistent route which is very bothersome because it leaves the entire story canon to unstable ground to say the least. There's a REASON for why the JP dinosaurs are inaccurate in the films. Need evidence? Read the novel.
Dinoslay 2 months ago
@Opposedhardline No it's because the raptors in the 1st one were females and the ones in the 3rd were male
IfinduIgetu 2 months ago
@IfinduIgetu Your joking rite because the gender didnt matter all velociraptors had feathers just due to the fact that the first one was older the wre able to add feathers in the old one.
Opposedhardline 2 months ago
@IfinduIgetu It's meant to be another version number of the same animal(at least to fan logic knowing the obscure canon has denied a true explanation) so the gender really doesn't mean anything. A different breed with quills in males until explained to be that or a retcon(lazy film-making is the most likely answer).
Dinoslay 2 months ago
@Dinoslay well it kind of did because remember in the 3rd one the 1 that looked like the one from the first came in and it was the mom lol idk could be a genetic mutation in the molecular structure of the phosphate base 5 carbon sugar etc.
IfinduIgetu 2 months ago
Have you played the game? I think you'll like it. It has many of the things you mentioned.
zootigerbeast 3 months ago
@zootigerbeast The feedback has indeed been really positive. Literally a sequel that Spielberg hasn't made. Here's hoping that he and the production team for any of the new movies take note in Telltale's effort. The story is the very definition to JP's success as a concept and if it is to succeed in the future the franchise must stay close to it's roots in what it wants to say.
Dinoslay 3 months ago
@Dinoslay I agree with you 100%! I really hope the 4th film will respect the views of all the real Jurassic Park fans not just those people who are crazy about special effects! I'm really counting on Spielberg, I hope he doesn't mess this up.
zootigerbeast 3 months ago
Okay I've got some good news and I've got some bad news. The good news is Jack Horner says that the script is finished! The bad well...he says they they brought all the dinosaurs back, and wants to make them scarier. The answer more genetic tampering??? What do you think? Do you feel like a JP3 plot happening?
DarthSmoke1 4 months ago
@DarthSmoke1 It does have a threatening implication back to Homocraptor but it could be Horner simply referring to the older script if it's all he knows about. That's my assumption. But even if they are going to tamper with the genes I still hope that it's kept within the boundary of what JP was built around(version numbers and Raptors changing looks). If you make dinosaurs into literal biological weapons it stops being unique and becomes a Sy-Fy Channel product. Already enough of those.
Dinoslay 4 months ago
I think the Dilophosaurus was a juvenile and would lose the frill becoming an adult because in the novel, it's its real-life size and lacks the frill but still posses the venom.
JParkL0v3r 4 months ago
How do you feel about them finally making it? And the game?
DarthSmoke1 5 months ago in playlist DarthSmoke1's Favorited Videos
@DarthSmoke1 I won't be assuming anything till I see them. With many cooks in the kitchen we can never be sure about what we get. But I trust that Telltale at least knows what they're doing.
Dinoslay 5 months ago
@Dinoslay Well I just hope your threre in the videos are right. Because one way or another, this new trilogy is getting made! If Steven S. can make Indiana Jones 4, and George Lucas can make more Star Wars movies, I can see why a new trilogy can't be made, I mean why settle for just JP4 when we can have 3 new and last ones?
DarthSmoke1 5 months ago
@DarthSmoke1 Depends. The story has to work to permit three movies. Like LOTR, they each should be connected so it won't feel like just padding whipped together to cash in on eager fans.
Dinoslay 5 months ago
@Dinoslay Hey! That's what I had in mind! I heard they're doing that with Superman.
DarthSmoke1 5 months ago
Gotta say man, wonderful videos, both parts. All your points are right on, and a fantastic film can be created here. Your said it perfectly about the spitters and raptors, neglectance... Great job man, with all the new news out, something may be finally coming into focus, let's hope it's what you say, a great a milestone as the first.
TheVraptor37 6 months ago
@TheVraptor37 To me the bottom line is that Jurassic Park always will be a great concept on it's own and any new movie that gets made should respect it. It's not about just CGI but what film-makers want to say and how audiences can associate.
If a story is good impressive effects can only enhance that. Without a good story the impressive effects simply don't matter. What made JP great was that it was believable both story and SFX wise. Nowadays it's just lazy computer work. Make it special!
Dinoslay 6 months ago
i cant wait for the fourth film! Has anyone heard anything about the Dilophosaurs and the Carnotaurs appearing in it! I sure hope so oh and also they should bring back T-rex regardless if Horner says its a scavenger or not its bollocks to the first two if you change the animals instincts just for the sake of "a new animal" and spino sucks anyways. Malcolm should return definately, Sam Neil says no but its ok. im tired of that indiana jones wannabe. responses please this is great! awesome vid btw
theguy782 7 months ago
@theguy782 HEY! The Spinosaurus looked badass.
GenerationMine 5 months ago
@GenerationMine agreed! he looked great! but no way in hell is he gonna dethrone the king of the dinosaurs. T-rex owns haha
theguy782 5 months ago
@theguy782 true, but spino will always have a place in my heart.
GenerationMine 5 months ago
Is Jurassic Park Emergence the same fan film as Prime Survival?
DarthSmoke1 7 months ago
great video Dinoslay, hope to see more as we get more jurassic park 4 news, Salutes =D
Scandnn 7 months ago
also I think, they should do a prequal to the original showing how it all started,how they made the dinasours and all the problems they had, and how hammond decided to make the park anyways, it would tie in perfectly to the original specially when hammond realized he was in way over his head, and if they do decide to make a fourth one, I think it would be spectacular to see one where the park is actuallly functional, and see what would have happened if hammods dream would have actually come true
Scandnn 7 months ago
from one jurassic park fan to another, I apreciate your take on the franchise, and the posible sequal JP4, in my humble opinion, I wish they never would have made JP2 and 3, all the sequals were, just mindless dino action, and I think what made the first one so great and unforgettable, is the fact that it was also very interesting, the dialogue and the characters were intriging.
Scandnn 7 months ago
@Scandnn The concept works best in the original JP. The challenge is to make it last more than one film which is where the sequels were quite rushed products. Universal simply wanted to make more money with the brand name so they ushered Spielberg to ask Crichton to write a sequel which is what he had never done and never did afterwards. The fact that the movie "adaptation" was nothing like it's respective novel only adds to the insult at what I consider a concept undervalued by it's owners.
Dinoslay 6 months ago
Steven Spielberg just confirmed Jurassic park 4 at Comic Con this year an said they do have a story and a writer, an that they hope to have it done in 2 or 3 years.
XxComablackxX1937 7 months ago
@XxComablackxX1937 @Dinoslay Sure, but before we actually get something solid it's something that I just refuse to get worked up about as two years is a lot of time for fans to spend in other productive activity aside just waiting. The fandom doesn't run exclusively on the movies anymore but the concept itself, Jurassic Park as a concept exceeds it's movies. All it takes is for the fans to express their love more than one way.
Dinoslay 6 months ago
Why cant the first raptors be Troodons?
hotwhire 7 months ago
@hotwhire Telltale Games has implemented Troodon to their story which I could easily see as a movie. It even takes inspiration from the novel. There's plenty of subjects that most of InGen's employees weren't aware of.
Dinoslay 7 months ago
jack horner (or how ever u spell his name) is the most stupid palentologist ever and i heard in a video that he doesn even specialize in predetory carnivore and how can u think t-rex is a mere scavenger?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! just look at that thing!!
moneyismagic2011 8 months ago
@moneyismagic2011 While his former theory may be absolute bollocks from evolutionary standpoint it doesn't make him stupid, just a bit too over ambitious to speculate about that species. T-rex may have gotten a little too much fame but it's physiology hints at an extreme adaptivity. It may not have been as active hunter as in JP but it still most likely was one bad mother that evolved to fit more than one food niche in it's time. An awesome animal for other words.
Dinoslay 8 months ago
@Dinoslay r u a palentologist????
moneyismagic2011 8 months ago
@moneyismagic2011 Not really so my statements can have assumptions in them. But I do use the work of real paleontologists as a starting point for my views regarding dinosaurs. There are much more factors in that science than I truly have understanding of but simply looking at the build of the skeleton tells quite a lot.
A perfect head with powerful jaws and legs suitable for uneven marsh terrain. I think T.rex was the ultimate form of opportunist. Compare it to a bear if you like.
Dinoslay 8 months ago
so....what do you guys think now?
theguy782 8 months ago
I think they should give us something brand new, Like I think they should either take the characters and us to site. C, or go back to Site. A,(Isla Nublar) Or the Mainland.
DarthSmoke1 8 months ago
@DarthSmoke1 Or a populated yet isolated area where someone has managed to form a hunting reserve with dinosaurs.
Dinoslay 8 months ago
Have you seen the claymation fan film that's down here?
DarthSmoke1 8 months ago
@DarthSmoke1 Yup, The Mainland is a really good story though it could use a bit more dinosaurs.
Dinoslay 8 months ago
@DarthSmoke1
What's it called? I'd like to see that
NachyoLulz5596 8 months ago
It's called "Jurassic Park: The Mainland". Just type it in and see it! it's good!
DarthSmoke1 8 months ago
@DarthSmoke1 Why dont they use an Allosaurus? It's ALREADY wrong that they consider T-rex being "Jurassic" when it lived FAR later in time then any arc of the Jurassic history. - 1 again.
hotwhire 7 months ago
I second your opinon dude! But if they go to a new island they should have a volcano. But we gotta cut Steven Spielburg and cast and crew some sluk they are going through bad times like every body else. Could you make another JP 4 video?
DarthSmoke1 8 months ago
@DarthSmoke1 I pretty much covered the most central problems with JP4 so there isn't much else to address save maybe for plot ideas.
I agree about everyone having hard times but it doesn't mean that people in the movie business can't communicate with their fans more reliably. It doesn't take a decade to give a definitive answer instead of endlessly cycling "Yes-No" gibberish. It isn't the fact that they aren't making a movie as of now but how they've kept covering up things from us.
Dinoslay 8 months ago
In regards to raptors:
It has been explained that on Isla Nublar, the reason the raptors were more "basic" was that they were far more engineered and perfected. They were essentiall lab rats, mutants. After Lost world and beginning with JP3, the raptors have been breeding for a long time now, and now they're starting to return to their more natural roots.
The Nublar raptors were attempts to be "theme park friendly".
You can read all about it online.
Dilo22 10 months ago
@Dilo22 Another possibility is that the "Nubies" were a later version and the JP3 versions are an earlier breed. If the scientists assumed the feathers to be a defect they'd change the dinosaurs to look more like the scientific "accuracy" of the 80'th decade. The goof in JP3 is that it pretty much ignores the original versions almost as if they wanted to make the audience believe that Raptors were always feathery in film continuity. It's quite inconsistent.
Dinoslay 10 months ago
@Dinoslay Yeah that's another one I read about. Both make sense and fit. But yeah I assume you mean how in his nightmare he saw the JP3 raptor on the plane rather than the JP1 ones. Makes no sense cause he's never even BEEN to Sorna yet!
Or is there something else you're getting at?
Dilo22 10 months ago
@Dilo22 Thats pretty much it.
Dinoslay 10 months ago
Though I think the third was the worst movie, story wise, it does present a lot of opportunities for the sequel, considering all the changes it made. They could try answering questions like "Where did Spino come from," or "Why do the raptors look different" and "what will the pteranodons do?" That would make for an interesting story. In my opinion, the best sequels generally emerge from the consequences of their prequels.
baryonyx550 11 months ago
@baryonyx550 I think so too, there's a better sense of interaction between each story that way, like a bridge. If you build a bridge out of padding or make it too complicated the bridge itself won't hold. Keep what made the concept good to begin with and supplement it instead of just throwing it to the trash.
Dinoslay 11 months ago
No no more sequels,we need a prequel
BankZed 1 year ago
@BankZed Not a bad idea.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
@Dinoslay Like, a prequel to the sequels but a sequel to the first movie.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
Michael would be ashamed at this! if he did make a 3rd book and more the would be better. But I think its unfair that there isn't a 4th film because in the 3rd film the T-Rex (the boss) got killed off by the Spinosaurus! I want the 4th film to come out because I want the series to be redeemed and see the T-Rex kick the spinosaurs butt!! And also have one of my favorite dinos the Allosaurus be in it but not REPLACE the rex like the Spino.
DarthSmoke1 11 months ago
@BankZed A prequel sounds awesome! 8D
VollendJatara9Jenny 10 months ago
you know back when i heard about the "human raptors" i flipped out and was ranting all over the place but now that ive seen their design i would have no problem with it if it was like in a hidden genetics lab by ingen's rival biosyn or something. that might sound bad but like a 30 sec cameo wouldnt be bad...especially if the story warranted it with a heavy plot on anticloning. i agree 100% with the dilophosaurus needing to be in the fourth way more and seriously we need trex regardless
theguy782 1 year ago
@theguy782 I'm not sure. Even as an experiment that is easily devoured by a true Velociraptor in a BioSyn conducted "endurance experiment", it still would feel insulting to Crichton's work let alone isn't a dinosaur anymore.
Dilophosaurus has had bigger potential than it were given. Even the first movie downscaled it for a supposed comedy effect. That scene could have been funny with a large version too if they did it accordingly. The book interpretation of Nedry's death is quite dark.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Speaking of cool things like JP4. Prehistoric Channe just launched. Been trying my best to rally the troops for PREHISTORIC CHANNEL.
prehistoric28 1 year ago
my favourite movie of all time.. but if theres a 4th... they would ruin it :(((
HaZrDSinner 1 year ago
@HaZrDSinner Depends on their focus. If they only give us bogus padding you're absolutely right. But if the story actually supports the original movie in moral focus besides entertaining it's worth doing. But it's all in the studio's hands really. You can't have a movie without a script and the script isn't any good you're better off not promising anything to begin with.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
you have a point, why did he dream of the feathered one when he only saw the non feathered one?
FTWMoonwalker 1 year ago
@FTWMoonwalker It is indeed terribly incoherent and no excuse from the film-makers can counter that. But the scene does have a saving grace in that it happens in Alan's head thus it doesn't necessarily have to mean anything as it's a dream. It still seems way too convenient and takes a little bit of the seriousness away from the creatures. We aren't meant to know the feathered types beforehand as we never met them before. So why is the one in the dream a plain copy of the ones to come?
Dinoslay 1 year ago
If I could request, I'd suggest you make a part 3 talking about the herbivores and the Pteranadons in the sequels
JParkL0v3r 1 year ago
@JParkL0v3r It's an otherwise good idea but this rant was specifically about the endless loop of the fourth movie and a few creative issues related to it which is why the other films have anything to do with it. We don't know if the Pteranodons have a part in IV.
Why not try and make one yourself? The fandom needs as many civilized opinions as possible. According to some people here my accent isn't the best type but that didn't stop me from doing this. Hop in, the more the merrier. :)
Dinoslay 1 year ago
@Dinoslay well I would but I just don't know what to say for an introduction
JParkL0v3r 1 year ago
you do know that real velociraptors are only like, 3 feet high in real life right?
la12muerta 1 year ago
@la12muerta In the movies that doesn't matter that they're huge, they're basically Deinonychus that people call Velociraptors. At one point Deinonychus was called "Velociraptor antirrhopus". That basically makes the JP Raptors an exaggerated Deinonychus.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
@la12muerta I heard the size of a turkey
JParkL0v3r 1 year ago
I have to say that I always found it odd that they made the raptors huge, shouldn't they be about the size of a turkey? Jurassic Park 4 should try to show a more realistic impression of dinosaurs and there are so many dinosaurs to choose from!
canigetanoorah 1 year ago
0:45 wait WOOT? LOL!
AGloriusCrushingz 1 year ago
Good video, but there is one error, but it's understandable. At 0:42 , it does show the male raptor from the third film, however, while I was listening to the commentary of JP3, the filmmakers stated that they knew that this was an issue since Allan Grant has never seen those particular raptors, so they said they tried their best to make it appear to look like the originals by lightening. They were in no way trying to replace those raptors from the first and second movie.
mesozoicisland22 1 year ago
@mesozoicisland22 Yes, I've heard that commentary as well. However, they could have easily avoided the confusion by digitally removing the quills and tweaking the eyes to look more cat-like. Instead we have clear traits of the new male Raptor which is easily seen in the shot. So why didn't they do it when it was easily within their grasp let alone affordable without using a separate classic puppet? Go figure. As it is it now has to be explained by other means.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
A Spino didn't eat flesh. They eet fish.
MISTGORILLA 1 year ago
@MISTGORILLA Yes, mostly fish plus a little bit of other meat. Tackling other large dinosaurs may not have been as practical as it were to theropods like, say, Allosaurus(or T-Rex). All theropods were opportunists in a sense so smaller species wouldn't have been too challenging prey to Spinosaurs. But it's size is mostly for intimidation and not true hunting.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
0:45 Raptor: Whoa whoa whoa, wait, what?
LunaticBunnyofEvil 1 year ago
dilophosaurus was replaced by compsognathus.
solidvipersnake 1 year ago
@solidvipersnake It sure was though was it necessary? The more the merrier and they could have somehow re-used the old Dilo animatronic if only in a cameo. The baby Trike has a cameo if you recall and that was never in the first movie.
Would you want the Spitter back?
Dinoslay 1 year ago
my question over the sequel is why is the smartest reptile confirmed as raptors? Because so far, the smartest dino ever known is Troodon (although it IS a same kind with raptors). Velociraptor was only a two-three kind pack hunter with a turkey-sized body, while Troodon can count 1+1 if we train them
alfredwellf 1 year ago
@alfredwellf True, real Velociraptors were more like their cousin Saurornitholestes.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
I have to be honest and say that I have allready seen the first move about 400 times, and thats because when i see the movie, i can feel fear of the dinosaures, and when i feel this i feel like i`m alone. and when im alone i feel helpless and the first movei got me into that feelign. in the fourth movie there are gonna be cars ,fbi,police,city, and that just totally sucks!! That is not Jurassic Park
elyasf 1 year ago
I am so fuckung agree with you, the first movie was the best, and then number 2 i think is the nuber two best, and the number three the badest movie. the new movie is going to be in town, the whole town/city feeling is not fitting into JP so i dont think the fourth movie is gonna be better than the first one.
elyasf 1 year ago
@elyasf Honestly, my fave was the third because it's the most scientific of all (it has the latest scientific background than the other two) like the raptors had feathers by then and the Spinosaurus was greater than T. rex in ways (except brainpower). But it still misspelled Spinosaurus as 'Spinosaurus aegypticus' (it should be 'aegyptiacus')
alfredwellf 1 year ago
@alfredwellf T-Rex also had stronger jaws. But I like both for their own strengths. Heck, I like all dinosaurs.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
@Dinoslay wait, how much jaw power does Spino had? Bcoz far as I recall Rexy had 4 tons. I believe Spino must have about the same, but it is logical if Spino had less, it has longer and narrower jaws...but who knew? No one conduct an experiment on it yet...or has there been?
alfredwellf 1 year ago
@alfredwellf As of now no force test have been made with the jaws of Spinosaurus although the delicate design hints at specialized feeding. It is enough to kill smaller scale(think about human size) dinosaurs and animals aside fish. But I think the claws are the general offense against larger foe. Wouldn't want to be punched by those.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
@Dinoslay So maybe T. rex was stronger biter than S. aegyptiacus?
alfredwellf 1 year ago
@alfredwellf Unlike tyrannosaurus, no complete skulls have been found, so there could be no test.
AGloriusCrushingz 1 year ago
4:27 bigfooot in background?
Bossvega13 1 year ago
In Jurassic Park 1, the Dilophosaurus part..there's a bottle of stolen DNA..there's no continue or stuff regarding it in JP2 or JP3.
I duno did anyone thot of the same thing like i did?
Bahamut84 1 year ago
@Bahamut84 John Sayles seemingly did but it didn't really make sense for it to be utilized in the "Homocraptor" story because the embryos wouldn't survive longer than one day in the mud thus they'd be gone by the time it got dug out, probably even contaminated by each other if there still were anything. It's much more productive for the antagonists to get live specimen to clone from than some old stale embryo scraps.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
@KYLEZ0R09 I agree about the first movie, in it the mesh model versions move like they actually interact with the scenery let alone were blended there smartly. The sequels blow it all out of proportion in an attempt to "outdo" the original without adding anything to that original film. Good sequels bond with the first part to flesh out it's meaning whereas bad sequels only play as a dirty trick to cash in on it's success. The JP sequels are junk, plain and simple.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
Not sure of anything benefitial to the fourth film. There is the fandom-made novel called Emergence which attempts to bridge the gap between the original and it's continuation by at least taking a better look at the genetic engineering which the franchise was supposed to be built on as an ethical tale.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
Spitty kills Spino in JP4. Your welcome for blowing your minds.
jparkss15 1 year ago
Thanks Dinoslayer for making this vids. concerning RAPTORS: in JP Trespasser Hammond states:"a third tribe of raptors took the mounthain for their territory, a leaner and thougher breed,". This can be the JP3 raptor version. Because they were the thougher tribe, and the island very small, it's most likely that this thougher breed filled the entire niche after 10 years. DILOPHOSAUR should indeed return. And I also want to see more SCIENCE. Malcolms algoritms from the novels would be nice.
MismeretMonk 1 year ago
Also, I forgot to say this, but some inaccuracies are forgivable. Like you said with the older form of velociraptor, you can't cancel out the first movie's inaccuracies, and I believe it is more important to keep with canon. Since Michael Crichton's novels don't go up to JP3 and because of the differences, the movies seem to have their own canon. Personally, I like the fact that spitter was reduced in size, it makes it seem like a cobra.
baryonyx550 2 years ago
So in the first movie, Spielberg seems to have covered all of out land animal fears. Big powerful predator (T.Rex), a serial killer (velociraptor) and a smaller, venomous creature (Dilophosaurus). It also have a variety of dinosaur interactions, not just carnivores attacking people. There was T.Rex hunting, Brachiosaurus browsing, and a flock of Galimimus. That's why the first one was so great, it wasn't just about the carnivores.
baryonyx550 2 years ago
@baryonyx550 Don't forget the Triceratops encounter
JParkL0v3r 4 months ago
Watch the first part now. I managed to upload a modified version.
Dinoslay 2 years ago
Really, who cares if there's scaly Raptors aside the feathered ones. The more the merrier. Same with Dilophosaurus, have young juveniles like in the original movie and adults with smaller crests and no neck cowl while still retaining the spitting ability. I mean, it's a no brainer! Why make it all so damned incosistent? I doubt a budget would be a limitation unless they use most of it to buy Dr.Pepper. Does the majority of it even go to the special effects?
Dinoslay 2 years ago
And why update the velociraptors in the first place? Why should the fossil record matter if the animals in Jurassic Park are all just genetic freaks anyway? Seriously, I hate the feathered raptors. Anyway, great video. 7/5!
DinoGeekProductions 1 year ago
Also remember that while they may be genetically modified they still are animals in a sense and not monsters. InGen breeding different versions is not unrealistic when compared to the "Homocraptors" that are total make-believe science. This is what makes JP work. So why ignore that?
Dinoslay 1 year ago
I'd have to say the Jurassic Park 3 Spinosaur pushes the envelope on that. As well as the raptors, who do some very unanimal things towards the end. Like follow them from inland, down a waterfall and cut them off from the shore that they magically knew the humans would be headed to. But still, my point was that the dinosaurs of Jurassic Park aren't the dinosaurs that lived 65 million years ago.
DinoGeekProductions 1 year ago
Yes, they do but then again Jurassic Park 3 is quite a step away from what Spielberg wished them to appear like. They're not human exterminators, just dangerous predators. Only the Raptors have the capacity of hunting humans for fun.
Dinoslay 1 year ago
Great video! cool! I like Jurassic Park!
TheToporHarley 2 years ago
Sorry about Part 1 guys, YouTube is being a b**ch.
Dinoslay 2 years ago
HA, great video!
Hellothasauras 2 years ago
I completely agree with this, especially the raptors and dilophosaurus. I've just started reading the novel, so I haven;t gotten very far, but I'm pretty sure that it would be unfair to ask for the entire book to be crammed into a movie, that being said, at least the first movie did have some thought provoking dialogue and could be analyzed for symbolism, especially the last scene where Grant sees the birds outside the copter.
baryonyx550 2 years ago
Posted the link. ;)
It appears that the outrageous machine driven crap here has associated the first part of my video with NBC from visual content thus it cannot be embedded to other sites. Total BS. >:-(
Dinoslay 2 years ago
"The Future Depends on you" ? I prefer "We make the future!" ;-) Hence JPE and thanks for the nod ;-) hehe... nice video! Where's part one? :-p
BrachioInGen 2 years ago