@turborota A couple of thoughts (and I'm not trying to be a smart you know what):
A lot of stuff seems obvious once it's been developed, but somebody's got to think of it first.
Also, "safety" isn't a a single thing, it's a process, and improving one piece of the puzzle just shows where the next weak link is. Before the late 70's, fire was a serious problem in open wheel racing. One thing that helped was moving the fuel tank to the center of the car, but that pushed the driver forward (con't)
That caused a lot of foot injuries, because the front of the car wasn't strong enough
They added crushable structures to the front of the car, stiffened the bulkhead in front of the driver's feet, and the leg injuries decreased. The added stiffness transferred more force to the driver, and we started having basal skull fractures.
The HANS helped tremendously with the skull fractures, but we'll soon see the next weak link, and fix it, and people will ask why didn't we fix that problem sooner.
Now that kind of crash would have at least guarranteed smashed legs. If you look at where the crash stops, and consider that the drivers feet were forward from the centerline of the front wheels, its horrirble to imagine the aftermath.
Since the death of Senna & Ratzenberger in 1994, F1 has taken big steps in the name of safety with their cars.
F1 cars have been the safest race cars to drive since 1994. No deaths or major driver fatalities. Unfortunately, I can't say the same thing about NASCAR, IRL, CART or WRC.
Yes, some of the circuits are pretty boring or run by third world countries & dictators.
But there's a lot of exciting ones too, like Spa, Monaco, Singapore, Melbourne, etc. F1 stills remains one of the most watched sports in the world, outside of the Olympics or the World Cup.
well new tracks are built with a special energy absorbing barrier that is very stiff, yet when hit at the speeds that formula 1 cars travel at, it crumples and absorbs a huge part of the energy. a 100mph crash into that kind of barrier is survivable for a formula 1 car
poor dummy...it had basal skull fracture
urmo345 8 months ago
whiplash
gokartmaster14 9 months ago
Whats the speed
kimi450 10 months ago
that is officially the end of that dummys neck lol
steflotti105 10 months ago
= Basilla skull fracture. Deadh within minutes.
Hans unit is a life saver!
0mani0 1 year ago
Watch how he opens the visor... like thats gonna help!!... Idiot !
lateboy4 1 year ago
@lateboy4 I think it's funny how you think that's an actual person in the car.
watchika2 1 year ago
@lateboy4
Please tell us you don't actually think it's a real person in a crash test?? Geez...
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago 2
Excellent winter car.
seapeddler 1 year ago
very insafe
FanDeAlguersuari 1 year ago
why the hell didnt we have hahns then? it just seems so obvious
turborota 1 year ago
@turborota A couple of thoughts (and I'm not trying to be a smart you know what):
A lot of stuff seems obvious once it's been developed, but somebody's got to think of it first.
Also, "safety" isn't a a single thing, it's a process, and improving one piece of the puzzle just shows where the next weak link is. Before the late 70's, fire was a serious problem in open wheel racing. One thing that helped was moving the fuel tank to the center of the car, but that pushed the driver forward (con't)
almostfm 1 year ago
That caused a lot of foot injuries, because the front of the car wasn't strong enough
They added crushable structures to the front of the car, stiffened the bulkhead in front of the driver's feet, and the leg injuries decreased. The added stiffness transferred more force to the driver, and we started having basal skull fractures.
The HANS helped tremendously with the skull fractures, but we'll soon see the next weak link, and fix it, and people will ask why didn't we fix that problem sooner.
almostfm 1 year ago
@turborota partly because hindsight is a wonderful thing and partly because materials didn't exist that made it possible
memberHD 1 year ago
so is there no word in German for "Crash Test"?
DeanoTheLegend87 1 year ago
so is there no word in German for "Crash Test"?
DeanoTheLegend87 1 year ago
damn hes neck must hurt! He probably wouldn't survive with a neck injury like that! Good HANS is here now to protect their necks.
dude2106 1 year ago
Medic!
mustanguy77 2 years ago 4
That's a broken leg :o
myronferrarifreak 2 years ago 2
wouldn't even feel it cause your head would be separated from your spine. Just ask #3.
vector6977 2 years ago
or two!! and what ever else is broken!
schuey7wc 2 years ago
that's more than a broken leg, have you got the eyes? Its head almost came off!
Fidelis94 2 years ago 3
and neck
sschlappkohl 1 year ago
Lol....you can see his shoulders jees D:
jraybay 2 years ago
the car doesnt have the body cover on it, thats why it looks a little exposed
schuey7wc 2 years ago
yes and I thing that with the cover on it, the bodywork wouldn't be so much taller...
It makes me think about the poor Senna's neck. They were very brave to race in such unsafe cars...
Fidelis94 2 years ago
damn, only the germans would think to do that!
EatmyDust1311 2 years ago
this car didnt have 1000hp, more like 550-600hp, and it was aluminium. The cars that had 1000hp at last had carbon tubs.
weallfollowmanutd 2 years ago 2
557-640hp actually but yeah your right on the mark....770 in 84, 850 in 85 and so on
schuey7wc 2 years ago
Now that kind of crash would have at least guarranteed smashed legs. If you look at where the crash stops, and consider that the drivers feet were forward from the centerline of the front wheels, its horrirble to imagine the aftermath.
weallfollowmanutd 2 years ago 2
not to mention him snapping his neck.
cragster101 2 years ago 3
What about his bloody head! 1000bhp machines and they drove them fearless.
art2000cc 2 years ago
Yes, it's a Brabham BT50-1, 1982
flavioricci1989 2 years ago
thanks
deggis4 2 years ago
This was pre-1994, maybe 1980?
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
My german is very very crappy but I can hear the reporter saying it was done in 1985.
keiwata262 2 years ago
he says 1985, thats right.
but he means that since then crash tests were periodically performed
dermaddin85 2 years ago
look at his neck
subzero92MK 2 years ago 2
yup, basal skull fracture!
aure232 2 years ago
thats scary, then look at nows cars
stowe07 2 years ago
the leg is gone
keytek9 2 years ago 2
Since the death of Senna & Ratzenberger in 1994, F1 has taken big steps in the name of safety with their cars.
F1 cars have been the safest race cars to drive since 1994. No deaths or major driver fatalities. Unfortunately, I can't say the same thing about NASCAR, IRL, CART or WRC.
RedneckBart 2 years ago 5
Well, F1 also uses the safest (and often, dullest) circuits in the world.
FormulaOneSpy 2 years ago
Yes, some of the circuits are pretty boring or run by third world countries & dictators.
But there's a lot of exciting ones too, like Spa, Monaco, Singapore, Melbourne, etc. F1 stills remains one of the most watched sports in the world, outside of the Olympics or the World Cup.
RedneckBart 2 years ago
NASCAR is pretty safe now
aure232 2 years ago
0:06 snapped neck
Amer791 2 years ago 3
I was going to say the same thing.
tubesukscantgeta 2 years ago
he is ok. just without legs
frostbaracudas 3 years ago 6
i can assure u he broke his neck or atleast damaged it badly and got handicaped.
WeAllGonnaDieAlive 2 years ago
You cannot break your neck in a forward impact of any velocity.
dombou70 2 years ago
WeAllGonnaDieAlive - you DO know that was just a crash TEST right? therefore it is not a person in the car? lol
BlindingAddiction 2 years ago
NO HANS DEVICE INVENTED AT THE TIME lol
joman66 3 years ago 3
God bless HANS.
MSx91 3 years ago 54
Wow! Not too bad!
GMminivans9968 3 years ago 2
poor neck
balivyta 3 years ago 34
speed?
vymetenec 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
stopped pretty quick and calm so 40mph
joejoe133 3 years ago
what is the point of testing an f1 car at 40?
they go up to 5 times faster than that
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
So what is the point of testing f1 at 140mph since we know that car will be almost totaly destroyed?
deekox1 2 years ago
f1 cars new ones at least can save their drivers at crashes of 200 mph
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
maybe if they leave the track at 200, not if they hit a concrete wall at 200. doesnt matter how well the car is built. wall + 100+mph = death.
r00sh 2 years ago 2
well new tracks are built with a special energy absorbing barrier that is very stiff, yet when hit at the speeds that formula 1 cars travel at, it crumples and absorbs a huge part of the energy. a 100mph crash into that kind of barrier is survivable for a formula 1 car
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
Comment removed
RedneckBart 2 years ago