Granted that this video is only part of the whole show, the argument made here is presumptuous. No where in the Bible does it say that there wasn't a billion or a trillion years prior to the start of mankind. In a hundred-fifty years from now, we will have made so many new discoveries in science, that I am sure the date of when we say the Earth "started" will change a hundred times over. The whole argument pitting science against Christianity, and visa versa, is redundant and a turn-off.
So they determine the grand canyon to be millions of years old based on the river taking that time to carve it. Alright, then how did the strata layers get there? Techtonics? That only displaces terrain but does not make layers. Water dynamics on a grand scale. Fluid can layer sediments that settle. Cave paintings to be a few thousand years old with men and dinosaur. Foot prints found with both man and dinosaur. Multiple cultures tell of a flood story a few thousand years back. Explain.
@NanoPlinket Explain how the author of the bible could claim the WHOLE wolrd was flooded. They didn`t know the earth is a sphere. And even if they knew, they had no way of going to the other side of the wolrd to check if it was flooded, or communicate with somebody on the other side, there was nobody there.
@Athrun000 Why would you not question it? It seems like you are ignoring quite a large issue if you are. I enjoy Kaku's work and I am currently reading one of his books. It's fascinating. Just because one begins an argument about God doesn't mean he isn't intelligent enough to your standards. Just by saying what you said actually refutes your own point. Regardless, whatever you believe, I respect it. I try to be fairly open minded
It depends on your perspective of God... if you are talking about the God of faiths and prayers... then I'm sorry, I do not find it intelligent enough for a debate.
@Athrun000 The God that most deists claim as "created everything."
Which could be viewed as a force which initiated the big bang. Even then that's deeming the unknown as a god. But go ahead and explain your perspective, im listening.
@Athrun000 The God that most deists claim as "created everything."
Which could be viewed as a force which initiated the big bang. Even then that's deeming the unknown as a god. But go ahead and explain your perspective, im listening.
Ha! Usher uttered one giant of a lie. There is not one lie in the Bible. There is not 2 or 3 or 4. There are thousands! It is a book filled with filthy little lies.
I get the feeling he is "shooting himself in the foot" with the whole religion thing. I don't blame him, religious people are nuts when it comes to defending it.
@FinaIFrontier I believe in God and i love science...different religions are just different interpretations of "God", religions are too rigid for any open mind debate, i am not a big fan of religions but i do believe in God...for me science is a "study of God's designs"
@PartyAllSeason So you are a deist, correct? Why do you believe in a God though? Just because something is unknown, doesn't make the unknown God or something caused by God..I would love to chat more with you.
@FinaIFrontier To even begin a rational discussion about one's (non) belief in anything, God included, one must first define the thing in question. Which definition of God does one believe in, or not believe in? There are infinite possible definitions of God, all highly subjective. Given the paltry limits of the human mind, many if not MOST possible definitions of God would be beyond our capability to even conceive them. Does our inability to "know" something mean it can not exist?
@kqr573v2 God could be defined as a multitude of things to different people. It's a concept, correct? If I had a piece of paper with the word "God" written on it, different people would each see entirely different things. You may see a force that created the universe, an Islamic person may see Allah, a Christian may see Jesus. God is a definition that sways under all opinions. And recently, physicists like Kaku, have seen that our universe's big bang event may have been caused by the..
@kqr573v2 budding off of another universe. Thus leaving the multiverse theory. Perhaps a series of facts could answer several questions which encumber the most intelligent minds of our day. It isn't known. In the meantime, I am going to stick out and wait for scientific truth that has been proven by facts and evidence. I understand that most people need the idea of a deity in their lives because it makes them feel a sense of purpose. But for me, that simply doesn't work...
@kqr573v2 I will probably die before most of these truths are known, by intend to stick by the scientists who strive to answer these questions. I don't find the idea of copping the unknown out with a god. It seems lazy to me. It's what man used to do to try to explain the unexplainable at the time. And look, we now know what it rains. Not because a god did it, but because of a complex water cycle on our planet.
I believe n god and th study of science, but even I dont believe everything n the bible. The bible doesnt rationalize whatsoever, it goes off of blind faith, and not proof. And thatz where science comez n, to prove theories and help give answerz to the many questionz of the universe.
@raiderlax5 me being individually unique is ridiculous to some1 who choosez to b like every1 else. ur kind is better known as "followers". problem wth u is.. ur a followerz follower.. u have no leader. lol
@RAWKEE Ever heard of biblical innerancy? The church believes this and most christians do. It's the belief the the bible is written without error. Biblical exegesis is the belief the bible is inspired by god, which is another doctrine of the church. It's nuts.
@trillz31 thatz 1 big problem I have wth religion. religious ppl are fixated wth what the bible sayz and nothing else. they dont trust their on eyez, experimentz and documentated and tested factz. therez been floodz for millionz of yearz. huge 1z, not jst 1 n the bible. they lose their own natural sense of perception. the bible has no sense of common sense whatsoever. Eve was made out of Adamz rib, well y cant we duplicate that effect to make life naturally again? Doesnt make sense.
Contrary postulate: Mind unaware of a final event, and being prior to matter, eternal, which Mind is aware of the practical model by which no ending is logical or mechanically possible. These imaginings produce their own dragons.
Now extends far enough back and even farther forward in which the story of Christ unfolds in creating the New Heaven and Earth. Joining that story ensures reproduction of our common aspirations without imposing more on people than the law of numbers.
I hate commenting on these things but wow xD So the Colorado carves a foot every thousand years, but then he later says an inch against the wall equals a thousand years and not even two minutes later says a step down the trail (probably at the very most two feet) equal 20,000 years. Short term memory loss much? Can't even remember his own points. If it carves a foot every thousand years NOW, and is no doubt smaller than it has ever been, then how does it equal an inch for every thousand years?
@TheLightShinji Hey actually said the River carved the path a foot every thousand years, lengthwise, but vertically 1 inch of erosion (done from the river and rain)
@handsup48 "The river is digging the canyon deeper at the rate of one foot every thousand years, and in that time all this rubble is eroding down into it from the rains". So basically, a foot deeper every thousand years. Plus if he were talking a net of one foot a year period that would be over four billion years to carve. 800 cubic miles x5280 feet in a mile x1000 years to carve a foot = 4,224,000,000 years to carve 800 cubic miles at a foot per thousand years.
@handsup48 And inch wise if it were an inch every thousand years it would be give or take from curvature from the sides of the canyon, it would be 12inch a foot, 1000 years per inch, 5280 feet per mile so 12x1000x5280=63,360,000. But at a foot each year it equals 5,280,000 so it would be a foot every thousand down not an inch. Although that time even, is likely wrong because losing a foot a year now, with the river being smaller now, plus floods and rains throughout, the time should be much less
@TheLightShinji The problem with your logic is that the first equation reveals the age of the rock at the bottom of the grand canyon. 1 inch of rock is 1000 years, and that is in the formation of the rock sediment, not the amount of rock the river carves out. Therefore in order to disprove the time solution of 63,360,000, you need to use a different variable other than the river, that being the amount of rock deposited in 1000 years.
@TheRTSGamer First was disputing that 5.5 million wouldn't be right. Second At the minimum of 5.5 million years at least 440ft of the top never saw the river. They were definitively not 440 foot down maybe at most 200 and they were looking at stone formed by an ocean, ocean as in no possible river. 440ft never saw the river, so all the formations above 4840ft from the bottom would have to of formed after the formation and carving of the river
@TheRTSGamer Also my main point was that carving at an inch a year would take much more than they say at 63,360,000yrs instead of 5.5, and at a foot would take 5,280,000 at most, which is much lower than there minimum. but that is excluding the great natural occurances before they started recording the amount lost each year. They are just recording natural river occurances instead of special variables, and the river definitively not at it's strongest now-a-days. They just guess and ballpark
I love how Dr. Kaku addresses the issue of theology. He just states his position and says that not everyone will agree with him. At least on here, he seems to be at peace with that. It's better to just get on with the science and history lesson than to get into a big debate on metaphysics and theology.
I find all this fascinating. Considering the claims of Christianity and other religions, what if: The ecological purpose of intelligent technological species, is the preservation of biospheres and habitats, when the native planets and stars are no longer able to do so. If it is discovered that most biospheres generate a species such as ourselves, able to live ,work, and build in space, I think the implications for theology are pretty fantastic. We become the very real "shepherds" of worlds.
The early Eden is fine, in consideration with Genesis 1:1 we see that the Earth was destroyed and remade after some catastrophe, or at least as far as man was concerned. Jesus said this is not my world or my servants would be fighting. It is believed God created this new race that lived 1000 years in Eden, of course you still had some survivors from whom Cain got his wife. Humanity IS much older, going back 200,000 years to Lemuria if not longer.
At that point we become a prison planet. One world, one government, one religion, one linear path, no freedom of any kind. Total oneness, like the black hole, abandonment of duality and gender we modify ourselves with transhumanism to become aliens. We have our collective consciousness and have lost our emotions, like many aliens, because the culture is completely heartless and evil.
If we didnt know we died, death would just be a stepping stone. Church has done nothing but lie to us. Mark 10:29,30 and Luke 20:27-38 proove conclusively and indisputably that Jesus taught reincarnation, and there are hundreds of other verses that confirm it throughout the Bible. Those who followed Jesus and made utopias of Love were killed by Rome. The people are governed because they are sinners, the more evil, the more need for government. Until technology allows for complete control of all
.the only problem i see with what this guy is saying is to get eternal life in heaven heaven must exist ,if you read the bible like i have as an adult and a free thinker ,you will notice christ teaches a gospel on gods kingdom which he says will be on earth . not in heaven ,some one this educated should know what the bible teaches .if their going to talk about it .so has science become as corrupt as religion and politics ? seems that way !
To those who say earth existed till god created things are wrong god was already there moving on the water...you are so square and religious that if you think in other way you think you might be a sinner...fools you got the freedom to think, god is not a entity that is waiting for you to sin to kill you according the bible, read ask and answer normal question that our humanity ask...and also learn to read first before making statements.
@coopmuch56 really now? Then explain how life started...? Mind you, I would like definitive evidence. Show me how cells form at random... Pretty please?
Not religious but I'm tired of seeing many scientist talking shit bout the bible, is true is a short historical book but to criticize you need to know first what the book says.
First of all, when good created the world the world already existed full of water, then what he created was a place where the creatures could live, there's no data of time of the earth just the time of human as creation, then is when I could fuck the mind of this scientist.
@TaishoKenpachi You clearly do NOT know the Bible. It clearly states that God created the heavens AND THE EARTH, including the waters. According to the Bible, there was no world "full of water" here already--God created everything from nothing. So your entire statement is wrong.
Don't claim knowledge you don't have. You don't even understand the first page of the Bible, as you showed with your incorrect comment.
@SuperDrRockzo First, it's "elohim," not "eloheim." I suggest learning how to spell the words you use before trying to correct other people. When you can't spell the word, it shows theat you don't understand the word. Second, elohim can be either singular (god) or plural) gods.
Aside from your incorrect and misspelled grammar lesson, what was your point?
That dude is total zero.what do you know about DNA,chromosomes and what they mean to you?You wanna be scientist talking about DNA and oh you know there is no God.Physics try to explain how the world works but when you leave matter and try to see something that has nothing to do with matter?You are a new age,psychedelic bullshit kid with no clue about what he talks.
Thats why he sent His Son to explain it to you. The bible speaks of chromosomes & DNA before anyone ever observed them read it This dudes just a newagesewage old babylon junk spouter.
@skillitt1 there is no spacedaddy and jesus is not god you moron shit. The bible does not speak about chromosomes and DNA, it speaks about slapping rapists on the hand and stoning people for gathering wood.
Dr. Michio Kaku needs more than "Proof"! He needs to put aside rationalism a little bit. So clear a cut would come of a mind who do not discounts its limitations in relation to the sense of value or significance for life. Tsk, tsk, poor storming brain, so full of doubts and wants...
well... I'm sure he means creatures that "consciously know that our time is limited". Other creatures have feelings sure, but they operate based solely on instinct. Not intellectual life beings.
@jolohmm Thats true with one exception. Dolphins, dolphins speak using intelligent speech and they use tools. If you need proof of that just look up the experiment when they ran dolphin speech through whatever the name of that software is that can tell if a species is intelligent based on speech
We all put tags on what we know to be true although we never push these tags aside when we are looking at the bigger picture,,, we as humans started monitoring time because we seen it as a pattern, the sun rose every day around the same time & set that very next evening we gave this process a name "time" although when you look at a term like "spacetime" it really does show how ignorant some scientists are to believe time is a fabric that can be bent & shaped, old words for new discoveries. Fail.
I came to watch this post because of its intellectual value. I enjoyed this video very much but I came believe how ignorant some of the posts are. God couldn't create the Universe because there wasn't time before the Universe? Christians think its OK to kill babies? Quite the opposite. I consider myself middle of the road and accept that if God did create the universe that God himself is so complex that a human cannot fathom the complete depth of his being or the universe. Think people.
SO 1 INCH EQAULS 1000 YRS CANYON IS 1 MILE DEEP THAT EQUALS 63 ,THOUSAND INCHES ABOUT,,,,,,THATS HOW OLD THE CANYON IS,,,BUT DOES IT HOLD TRUE FOR REST OF PLANET
The Greatest Scientific Explanation. The Spirit Lives! HEAVENLY FATHER HAS APPEARED AND HE WALKS AMONG US. Only the Creator Himself can reveal His vision as His own. All He reveals in his gift to humanity..// watch LA PAROLA IN CUATRO and merge with the greatest pronouncement and the highest science. Watch and rejoice..! it is He!! @ La Parola In Cuatro.
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexuality and homosexuality. Even non-religious people know this.
The homosexual agenda is not good for anyone, including those who consider themselves "gay".
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have successfuly framed themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
Believing in the Bible/QurAn inspired afterlife is DANGEROUS.
1.) Christian's heaven -dead babies go straight to heaven. That may justify INFANTICIDE. A person may kill babies as a heroic act to save mankind from the fires of hell. He would even say "I don't care if I go to hell, for as long as they're in heaven"
2.) Islamic Heaven -reward of 72 virgins, wine, etc.
That's why Muslim terrorist are not afraid to kill themselves. They're too horny to go to the afterlife (better sex).
Do you ever wonder why some ancient building are below current ground levels from where they were build. Why do archaeologist nearly always dig deep to find some ancients site or building that is only a few thousand years old not millions
1) Most ancient buildings were built from heavy materials and ancient civilizations didn't know much about structural engineering and weights effect on ground. So a lower height than ground level has to do with the buildings weight and sinking over time.
Depending on the density and deterioration of minerals in the ground can determine how deep you need to go to see farther back in time.
Perhaps the flood caused the earth to look older than it is Perhaps the gran cannon was cut out by the flood. I have noticed that nature works a lot quicker than we have been told. It is said it takes millions of years but I think it takes a lot less from what I see in nature.
The deterioration caused to create the grand canyon would look nothing like it does today if it was caused by a single event, damage over time usually shows inconsistencies like all the turns and bends in the grand canyon while single event destruction shows a more uniform destruction, for instance a nuclear device makes uniform blast area from the center explosion.
For those who are saying 'do you know how dry it is in Arizona' blah blah. We are talking time on a scale of millions of years. Such a length of time that you can't even comprehend. Weather patterns have changed repeatedly over those millions of years, it wasn't always dry, even if the canyon was always as dry as it was continually for those millions of years the small amount of water running would still carve a crevasse of reasonable size.
In this video, I see Kaku learning about Geology. It's kind of weird to see someone of his knowledge caliber learning something new when he's always amazing many with his views on Physics. It's sort of a humbling experience to be so knowledgeable about something and know that there still is so much that we don't know.
I think on the concept of re-birth the only scientific way leading toward it is, taking on a scientific atheistic materialistic world in which my consciousness is not real, its more of an illusion. I (consciousness) am merely a by-product of my brain. Consciousness is like an application, consciousness evolved because its much easier to have a commander of a spaceship than just people doing automatic jobs.
If I'm not real then there is no leap of faith required for me to experience life again
Another way is that you could look at the accumulation of knowledge in your brain as energy(which in a way it is) and in science energy can neither be created or destroyed so you might not live forever as yourself but the energy that you carry with you till the day you die will carry on forever.
@vannpaul29 Not if your a really hot 14 year old sweet girl (or boy, depending on what tickles your fancy). You see my friend, in our modern day, sex can be used as a currency.
Wonder if these Advocates knew the Annual Rainfall in Colorado? Does all those Centuries Years of RainWater did all that Soil and Rock Erosion? Where did it go? Miles of Land on all sides of the Grand Canyon before the Pacific Ocean and Gulf of Mexico?!
I don't really ever write comments, but I am on this video. The world is not 6,000 years. The Bible does not even go by that. What we know is that God created the Earth... God also created Adam and Eve... Were they babies? No. Was the Earth a "baby?" All of the trees, rocks, etc... were they "babies?" Probably not. Moreover, The Bible also teaches one that Lucifer reigned on Earth... and this was before the creation of Adam and Eve.
1) where did you get "lucifer reigned on earth...before the creation of adam and eve"? ezekiel 18? not exactly what it says..
2) when you make statements like "what we know is that god created the earth..." and the ones that follow, are you even aware of the fact that these statements are seen by many, many people as unfounded assertions based upon ancient fears?
@benny8hill you're asking good questions - now do actual research and get real answers.
1. Ezekiel 28: 11-23. Specifically, the end of 13 and 14.
2. I'm not going to lie, the Bible has some "crazy" stories, so I can definitely see why it's hard to believe. But it all has to be taken in by faith. If you want to go by facts, focus on the fact that Christianity has spread, is still growing, and find out why. Find out about what God has been doing in Africa (people being raised from the dead), what God is doing now in China. There is way too much evidence out there:)
@ProphecyRJ Or maybe you are retarded!? Do you KNOW? What is knowledge? Answer that! Don't give the cookie stamp answer that everyone already "knows" in your hast to belittle or otherwise feel smarter. I mean, that would afterall be a bit "retarded," wouldn't it?! Forget the obvious surface, let's deep dive. I'm sure you will have help from others "jump" me. I'm excited.
@ProphecyRJ If that makes you feel fresh and lovely inside, knock yourself out. But you went out of your way to say a two mere words, just to insult someone. THAT is "retarded" in my book, dumb ass. Look! See? I can insult you also. Yippie...but it doesn't really do much for me. You're just a little weasel looking to pick. But at least you didn't reply with some canned monkey assed aetheist ignorance! Applaud!
@ProphecyRJ That's great. Who made the first comment? "your retarded." ... hmmmm. But we AGREE on something, sort of! My thoughts exactly, and the whole essence of my comment. Unfortunately, my effort was all for naught. Just be more respectful.
@9b8 Respect? I think you should not put your beliefs onto other people. You may believe what you want, every human has that freedom. But trying to convert people into believing what you believe is not 'respectful' in my eyes.
@ProphecyRJ Aha! There WAS motive! You were being awfully wormy about it! First of all, "I" never put my belief ON you, but I understand you actually are generalizing religious people. I don't see where anyone (here at least) is bullying you, coercing you, or otherwise converting you to any particular belief; rather they are only testifying their own beliefs. But I agree that would be unfair. Same goes for anyone and any belief. And that does include atheists. I stand by my point: be respectful.
1) sorry - i meant 28 actually. and i always loved this chapter and verses 13 and 14 in particular as an indictment of satan, though it is addressed to the king of tyre, who was "sealing up a pattern" by following satan's example. but it says that this 'pattern-maker', who is not named lucifer anywhere, was an 'anointed cherub' who was guarding the garden of eden, not ruling over it.
2) it does NOT "have to be taken in by faith"', and i do prefer facts. but...
a) the spread of islam is more impressive by any measure, and neither proves anything about any god. i think you may need to take another look at "why"..
b) i'm saddened that you so easily believe (obviously on hearsay) that people are being raised from the dead, and then attribute that to a god who, if he existed as described, would easily be able to do that in places where there are videocameras at the ready.
From the book of I, "Time is man-made, illusive. We live in a universe of motion, a celestial body moving around a sun. A new day isn't, it just always is."
For more on science & nature try books by top scientists; astronomer Victor J. Stenger, ' Fallacy of fine tuning ', Richard Dawkins, ' Unweaving the rainbow ' & ' The greatest show on earth ' & PZ Meyers & the website Talkorigins
@thewayandwordoflife it might be true that hindu time scale is somewhat similar to scientific one but this does say that hinduism is the right way of life or its true,hinduism in mythology,some characters like rama even dont have historic proof,hinduism was contributed by selfish brahmins that is indian aryans for their own purpose,it is full of violence and inequality,on the other hand christianity have undeniable proofs see bible numerics and bible fulfilled prophecies,by the way i am indian
I HOPE that some collegue calls this physics genius out on lying to everyone on this show. Don't ALL rivers carve away thousands of square miles of rock, leaving GINORMOUS Canyons surrounding them, after hundreds of thousands, and even millions of years??? ........ WHAT!?!?....They DON'T??? Why NOT? I mean, aren't there thousands of rivers around the world, that flow over the same kind of soil and rock??? Well, what's so different about the Colorado River- compared to several thousands of o
@TheWayandWordofLife How about the simple explanation of Colorado river being older than the other ones? River basins don't always stay the same. Many things, like plate tectonics and climate change, affect them. The fact you seem ignorant to these factors kind of makes me question your ability to assess the amount of rock a river can consume in millions of years.
Strange how it's amusing and annoying at the same time when laymen deny years of research because it doesn't sound right to them.
This is just INSULTING, people!!! How gullible do these scientists think we are??? Arizona is one of the hottest, driest places on earth. The rocks of those canyon walls are so dry, and solid- it would take THE widest, deepest, most rapidly rushing river, to ever carve out even a small portion of the Grand Canyon's rock layer(s). Even then, it could only be a few yards WIDER than the WIDTH of the river's width. The Grand Canyon is literally thousands of square miles in area, and miles in
The Colorado River would have to have originally been MILES WIDE, and had numerous points where it BRANCHED off into several other extremely WIDE river paths. If the Colo. River caused the ENORMOUSLY DEEP, AND WIDE Grand Canyon, WHY have not almost ALL other rivers CAUSED 'grand Canyon's as well??? Especially rivers that are much wider, deeper, and much FASTER FLOWING?.....THINK ABOUT IT People!..... Colorado, ( where I'm from), Arizona, New Mexico, Utah- are all VERY DRY CLIMATES, and have a
Science and God are not incompatable, perhaps science and religion are. The belief that God doen not exist is still just a belief. There are many scientist who believe in God. The more I learn about science the more I believe in God. Many of the scientis on the cutting edge feel they are learning to understand God, not prove he doesn't exist. There are also many scientist who don't believe in God. What we do, or do not believe has no effect on whether God exist.
When it comes to existence of GOD, scientists always work to be politically correct. They spent billions of dollars to create evidences to disprove existence of GOD, to no avail. Science tells us universe is infinite, but no prove, but they just "believe". They prefer to stick with the fairytale "evolution". Science has no answer for the existence of opposite sex in all living creatures, instinct behaviors, complex nature of living things (cell, brain, sperm, egg, etc.). Evolution is stupid
@Andytz100 science has not spent billions and billions of dollars to disprove god, because the existence of god is not testable and therefore insignificant, and impossible to prove or disprove. please show me 1 study funded by any top ranking science administration thats main purpose was to disprove god. sorry you won't find one, because there never was any. many scientists don't "believe" the universe is infinite, we have no proof that it is finite so for the time time we can't prove that its
@Andytz100 actually finite or finite. if we got all our science from the bible the average life span would still be in the mid 30's. remember that wars were fought with swords and shields merely 500 years ago, and now we have nuclear weapons. you really think technology is at its end and we'll never understand anything more? i feel sorry for you as you pose no hope in the human race, and serve only as an obstacle in the way of greater technology because you believe in a book.
@ComeAndGetMeScum every fully aquatic amphibian I've owned has crawled on to land to die(instinct?). My dog death was too sudden for that. But dogs are incredibly smarter and also can recognize other things dying. So what does it think when if it actually gets to see a person or another dog die?
on a quantem levle as in the double slit exp. i feel that time is onlly the now as we are creating observers. the past and future are a perseption of the now
The reason why you walk by faith and not by how it looks (or IS) is because 1) You have no good reason to believe what you believe and 2) How it looks (IS) brings you despair.
@finalfantasy8911 I don't even know where to start. I walk by faith due to I believe in GOD and my hope is one day to met him. Seeing is not always believing if I went to a place that people never seen lets say a cow and I start talking to them about a cow why should they believe me that a cow even exist. I know I seen the cow but did the people I'm talking to seen a cow no so they put faith in me that I'm not telling a lie. You get at what I'm saying.
@finalfantasy8911 I don't even know where to start. I walk by faith due to I believe in GOD and my hope is one day to met him. Seeing is not always believing if I went to a place that people never seen lets say a cow and I start talking to them about a cow why should they believe me that a cow even exist. I know I seen the cow but did the people I'm talking to seen a cow no so they put faith in me that I'm not telling a lie. You get at what I'm saying.
@finalfantasy8911 I don't even know where to start. I walk by faith due to I believe in GOD and my hope is one day to met him. Seeing is not always believing if I went to a place that people never seen lets say a cow and I start talking to them about a cow why should they believe me that a cow even exist. I know I seen the cow but did the people I'm talking to seen a cow no so they put faith in me that I'm not telling a lie. You get at what I'm saying.
This has been flagged as spam show
Granted that this video is only part of the whole show, the argument made here is presumptuous. No where in the Bible does it say that there wasn't a billion or a trillion years prior to the start of mankind. In a hundred-fifty years from now, we will have made so many new discoveries in science, that I am sure the date of when we say the Earth "started" will change a hundred times over. The whole argument pitting science against Christianity, and visa versa, is redundant and a turn-off.
YouWatchedMeDying 1 day ago
Comment removed
YouWatchedMeDying 1 day ago
So they determine the grand canyon to be millions of years old based on the river taking that time to carve it. Alright, then how did the strata layers get there? Techtonics? That only displaces terrain but does not make layers. Water dynamics on a grand scale. Fluid can layer sediments that settle. Cave paintings to be a few thousand years old with men and dinosaur. Foot prints found with both man and dinosaur. Multiple cultures tell of a flood story a few thousand years back. Explain.
NanoPlinket 1 day ago
@NanoPlinket Explain how the author of the bible could claim the WHOLE wolrd was flooded. They didn`t know the earth is a sphere. And even if they knew, they had no way of going to the other side of the wolrd to check if it was flooded, or communicate with somebody on the other side, there was nobody there.
ndzoko 11 hours ago
Those that actually search for Kaku's videos are too intelligent to start an argument over God.
Athrun000 2 days ago
@Athrun000 Why would you not question it? It seems like you are ignoring quite a large issue if you are. I enjoy Kaku's work and I am currently reading one of his books. It's fascinating. Just because one begins an argument about God doesn't mean he isn't intelligent enough to your standards. Just by saying what you said actually refutes your own point. Regardless, whatever you believe, I respect it. I try to be fairly open minded
FinaIFrontier 2 days ago
@FinaIFrontier
It depends on your perspective of God... if you are talking about the God of faiths and prayers... then I'm sorry, I do not find it intelligent enough for a debate.
Athrun000 2 days ago
@Athrun000 The God that most deists claim as "created everything."
Which could be viewed as a force which initiated the big bang. Even then that's deeming the unknown as a god. But go ahead and explain your perspective, im listening.
FinaIFrontier 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Athrun000 The God that most deists claim as "created everything."
Which could be viewed as a force which initiated the big bang. Even then that's deeming the unknown as a god. But go ahead and explain your perspective, im listening.
FinaIFrontier 2 days ago
Ha! Usher uttered one giant of a lie. There is not one lie in the Bible. There is not 2 or 3 or 4. There are thousands! It is a book filled with filthy little lies.
TheCobalt100 3 days ago
They call me a troll,
moon of the earth-Hrungnir
wealth sucker of the giant,
destroyer of the storm-sun
beloved follower of the seeress,
guardian of corpse-fiord,nafjord
swallower of the wheel of heaven
What's a troll if not that?
slowmopoke 5 days ago
One of the most brilliant minds able to explain such complex things in laments terms.
LosAngelesFresh1 1 week ago
Only on Kaku's vids will there be no troll wars.
Noogabar 1 week ago
Notice how he never brings up his points with the grand canyon guy. Suspicious....is he scared he would supply a reason?
FinaIFrontier 2 weeks ago
I get the feeling he is "shooting himself in the foot" with the whole religion thing. I don't blame him, religious people are nuts when it comes to defending it.
FinaIFrontier 2 weeks ago
@FinaIFrontier I believe in God and i love science...different religions are just different interpretations of "God", religions are too rigid for any open mind debate, i am not a big fan of religions but i do believe in God...for me science is a "study of God's designs"
PartyAllSeason 1 week ago
@PartyAllSeason So you are a deist, correct? Why do you believe in a God though? Just because something is unknown, doesn't make the unknown God or something caused by God..I would love to chat more with you.
FinaIFrontier 1 week ago
@FinaIFrontier To even begin a rational discussion about one's (non) belief in anything, God included, one must first define the thing in question. Which definition of God does one believe in, or not believe in? There are infinite possible definitions of God, all highly subjective. Given the paltry limits of the human mind, many if not MOST possible definitions of God would be beyond our capability to even conceive them. Does our inability to "know" something mean it can not exist?
kqr573v2 3 days ago
@kqr573v2 God could be defined as a multitude of things to different people. It's a concept, correct? If I had a piece of paper with the word "God" written on it, different people would each see entirely different things. You may see a force that created the universe, an Islamic person may see Allah, a Christian may see Jesus. God is a definition that sways under all opinions. And recently, physicists like Kaku, have seen that our universe's big bang event may have been caused by the..
FinaIFrontier 2 days ago
@kqr573v2 budding off of another universe. Thus leaving the multiverse theory. Perhaps a series of facts could answer several questions which encumber the most intelligent minds of our day. It isn't known. In the meantime, I am going to stick out and wait for scientific truth that has been proven by facts and evidence. I understand that most people need the idea of a deity in their lives because it makes them feel a sense of purpose. But for me, that simply doesn't work...
FinaIFrontier 2 days ago
@kqr573v2 I will probably die before most of these truths are known, by intend to stick by the scientists who strive to answer these questions. I don't find the idea of copping the unknown out with a god. It seems lazy to me. It's what man used to do to try to explain the unexplainable at the time. And look, we now know what it rains. Not because a god did it, but because of a complex water cycle on our planet.
FinaIFrontier 2 days ago
@kqr573v2 *why it rains
FinaIFrontier 2 days ago
Epic lightning strike.
BrashOfKhaamph 2 weeks ago
"...there is not proof that it exists, remarkable claims require remarkable proof...but maybe you don't need proof, well i do"
This is why i like Dr. Kaku, very wise man.
MercenaryBlackWaterz 3 weeks ago
I believe n god and th study of science, but even I dont believe everything n the bible. The bible doesnt rationalize whatsoever, it goes off of blind faith, and not proof. And thatz where science comez n, to prove theories and help give answerz to the many questionz of the universe.
RAWKEE 3 weeks ago
@RAWKEE one of which being why you chose to make your post look ridiculous by replacing s with z and not typing out a two letter word
raiderlax5 3 weeks ago
@raiderlax5 me being individually unique is ridiculous to some1 who choosez to b like every1 else. ur kind is better known as "followers". problem wth u is.. ur a followerz follower.. u have no leader. lol
RAWKEE 3 weeks ago
@raiderlax5 true
huzefa515253 2 weeks ago
@RAWKEE Ever heard of biblical innerancy? The church believes this and most christians do. It's the belief the the bible is written without error. Biblical exegesis is the belief the bible is inspired by god, which is another doctrine of the church. It's nuts.
FinaIFrontier 2 weeks ago
they dont put into consideration of the Flood. well from a religious point of view.
trillz31 3 weeks ago
@trillz31 thatz 1 big problem I have wth religion. religious ppl are fixated wth what the bible sayz and nothing else. they dont trust their on eyez, experimentz and documentated and tested factz. therez been floodz for millionz of yearz. huge 1z, not jst 1 n the bible. they lose their own natural sense of perception. the bible has no sense of common sense whatsoever. Eve was made out of Adamz rib, well y cant we duplicate that effect to make life naturally again? Doesnt make sense.
RAWKEE 3 weeks ago
Dr Michio Kaku, why the fuck are you beginning to look like Bill Maher?
sagar246246 3 weeks ago
@sagar246246 At least he's smarter then Bill Maher
Ollyoxenreebird 3 weeks ago
how about elefants, girafes, that go away to die. They probably know, but in some other way.
cacasarq 3 weeks ago
It's too bad the Grand Canyon couldn't have been carved out by a river considering rivers flow downhill not uphill.
zigora3 3 weeks ago
@zigora3 Are you saying the Colorado River flows uphill?
mentalphysicalism 6 days ago
@mentalphysicalism no I'm saying for a river to have formed the grand canyon, said river would have to flow uphill at one point.
zigora3 5 days ago
@zigora3 Water would form lakes upstream to the higher area until the higher
area erroded.
mentalphysicalism 5 days ago
@mentalphysicalism Precisely but the flood plane would have been massive. And the erosion would have been rapid, because of the size of the lake.
zigora3 2 days ago
I'm actually surprised there's no troll war below...
RyuikHan 4 weeks ago 29
@RyuikHan everybody's to busy trying to make their own point haha
joshandersonmusic 3 weeks ago
@RyuikHan or illuminati theories...
kikebjj 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
go to: god of wonders dot org and click on "chapters",..watch them in numbered order and try as you might to discredit them.
trjonez 4 weeks ago
Contrary postulate: Mind unaware of a final event, and being prior to matter, eternal, which Mind is aware of the practical model by which no ending is logical or mechanically possible. These imaginings produce their own dragons.
Now extends far enough back and even farther forward in which the story of Christ unfolds in creating the New Heaven and Earth. Joining that story ensures reproduction of our common aspirations without imposing more on people than the law of numbers.
tactful truth
jesusjamey 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
believer = Sidious, Vader
atheist = Han Solo
:p
dfdtdfdx 1 month ago
I hate commenting on these things but wow xD So the Colorado carves a foot every thousand years, but then he later says an inch against the wall equals a thousand years and not even two minutes later says a step down the trail (probably at the very most two feet) equal 20,000 years. Short term memory loss much? Can't even remember his own points. If it carves a foot every thousand years NOW, and is no doubt smaller than it has ever been, then how does it equal an inch for every thousand years?
TheLightShinji 1 month ago
@TheLightShinji Hey actually said the River carved the path a foot every thousand years, lengthwise, but vertically 1 inch of erosion (done from the river and rain)
handsup48 1 month ago
@handsup48 "The river is digging the canyon deeper at the rate of one foot every thousand years, and in that time all this rubble is eroding down into it from the rains". So basically, a foot deeper every thousand years. Plus if he were talking a net of one foot a year period that would be over four billion years to carve. 800 cubic miles x5280 feet in a mile x1000 years to carve a foot = 4,224,000,000 years to carve 800 cubic miles at a foot per thousand years.
TheLightShinji 1 month ago
@handsup48 And inch wise if it were an inch every thousand years it would be give or take from curvature from the sides of the canyon, it would be 12inch a foot, 1000 years per inch, 5280 feet per mile so 12x1000x5280=63,360,000. But at a foot each year it equals 5,280,000 so it would be a foot every thousand down not an inch. Although that time even, is likely wrong because losing a foot a year now, with the river being smaller now, plus floods and rains throughout, the time should be much less
TheLightShinji 1 month ago
@TheLightShinji The problem with your logic is that the first equation reveals the age of the rock at the bottom of the grand canyon. 1 inch of rock is 1000 years, and that is in the formation of the rock sediment, not the amount of rock the river carves out. Therefore in order to disprove the time solution of 63,360,000, you need to use a different variable other than the river, that being the amount of rock deposited in 1000 years.
TheRTSGamer 1 month ago
@TheRTSGamer First was disputing that 5.5 million wouldn't be right. Second At the minimum of 5.5 million years at least 440ft of the top never saw the river. They were definitively not 440 foot down maybe at most 200 and they were looking at stone formed by an ocean, ocean as in no possible river. 440ft never saw the river, so all the formations above 4840ft from the bottom would have to of formed after the formation and carving of the river
TheLightShinji 1 month ago
@TheRTSGamer Also my main point was that carving at an inch a year would take much more than they say at 63,360,000yrs instead of 5.5, and at a foot would take 5,280,000 at most, which is much lower than there minimum. but that is excluding the great natural occurances before they started recording the amount lost each year. They are just recording natural river occurances instead of special variables, and the river definitively not at it's strongest now-a-days. They just guess and ballpark
TheLightShinji 1 month ago
@TheLightShinji ballpark isn't a verb.
pat5168 1 month ago
Comment removed
TheLightShinji 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pat5168 Verb
ballpark (third-person singular simple present ballparks, present participle ballparking, simple past and past participle ballparked)
To make a rough estimate.
"If you don’t have the exact expense total, just ballpark it".
Do me a favor and try looking it up before trying to be a smart-ass.
TheLightShinji 1 month ago
I love how Dr. Kaku addresses the issue of theology. He just states his position and says that not everyone will agree with him. At least on here, he seems to be at peace with that. It's better to just get on with the science and history lesson than to get into a big debate on metaphysics and theology.
Theroha 1 month ago
I find all this fascinating. Considering the claims of Christianity and other religions, what if: The ecological purpose of intelligent technological species, is the preservation of biospheres and habitats, when the native planets and stars are no longer able to do so. If it is discovered that most biospheres generate a species such as ourselves, able to live ,work, and build in space, I think the implications for theology are pretty fantastic. We become the very real "shepherds" of worlds.
vladdrac88 1 month ago
The early Eden is fine, in consideration with Genesis 1:1 we see that the Earth was destroyed and remade after some catastrophe, or at least as far as man was concerned. Jesus said this is not my world or my servants would be fighting. It is believed God created this new race that lived 1000 years in Eden, of course you still had some survivors from whom Cain got his wife. Humanity IS much older, going back 200,000 years to Lemuria if not longer.
Phaedron777 1 month ago
At that point we become a prison planet. One world, one government, one religion, one linear path, no freedom of any kind. Total oneness, like the black hole, abandonment of duality and gender we modify ourselves with transhumanism to become aliens. We have our collective consciousness and have lost our emotions, like many aliens, because the culture is completely heartless and evil.
Phaedron777 1 month ago
If we didnt know we died, death would just be a stepping stone. Church has done nothing but lie to us. Mark 10:29,30 and Luke 20:27-38 proove conclusively and indisputably that Jesus taught reincarnation, and there are hundreds of other verses that confirm it throughout the Bible. Those who followed Jesus and made utopias of Love were killed by Rome. The people are governed because they are sinners, the more evil, the more need for government. Until technology allows for complete control of all
Phaedron777 1 month ago
Time is man-made
MrRatchet1995 1 month ago
.the only problem i see with what this guy is saying is to get eternal life in heaven heaven must exist ,if you read the bible like i have as an adult and a free thinker ,you will notice christ teaches a gospel on gods kingdom which he says will be on earth . not in heaven ,some one this educated should know what the bible teaches .if their going to talk about it .so has science become as corrupt as religion and politics ? seems that way !
crazysillybaby1 1 month ago
To those who say earth existed till god created things are wrong god was already there moving on the water...you are so square and religious that if you think in other way you think you might be a sinner...fools you got the freedom to think, god is not a entity that is waiting for you to sin to kill you according the bible, read ask and answer normal question that our humanity ask...and also learn to read first before making statements.
TaishoKenpachi 1 month ago
@coopmuch56 really now? Then explain how life started...? Mind you, I would like definitive evidence. Show me how cells form at random... Pretty please?
DemonicPuppet83 1 month ago
@DemonicPuppet83 I would like definitive evidence that there is a magic sky man.
LamaPaj 1 month ago
Youtube Mike Hoggard Title Jesus DNA and the Holy Bible, also see Dr Hugh Ross. 11 dimensions , ( or 13 i forgot)
skillitt1 1 month ago
THE GOD PARTICLE.
FRANCECHILD 1 month ago
IS THIS PROOF?
FRANCECHILD 1 month ago
Not religious but I'm tired of seeing many scientist talking shit bout the bible, is true is a short historical book but to criticize you need to know first what the book says.
First of all, when good created the world the world already existed full of water, then what he created was a place where the creatures could live, there's no data of time of the earth just the time of human as creation, then is when I could fuck the mind of this scientist.
I know a bit the bible, we need to learn to read
TaishoKenpachi 1 month ago
@TaishoKenpachi You clearly do NOT know the Bible. It clearly states that God created the heavens AND THE EARTH, including the waters. According to the Bible, there was no world "full of water" here already--God created everything from nothing. So your entire statement is wrong.
Don't claim knowledge you don't have. You don't even understand the first page of the Bible, as you showed with your incorrect comment.
paxpaul 1 month ago
@paxpaul Science proves how earth was made, and it wasnt magic sky man.
coopmuch56 1 month ago
@coopmuch56 I agree. I was pointing out what the Bible claims. That's all my comment was about.
paxpaul 1 month ago
@paxpaul It says "eloheim created the heavens and the earth." Eloheim means "the gods."
SuperDrRockzo 1 month ago
@SuperDrRockzo First, it's "elohim," not "eloheim." I suggest learning how to spell the words you use before trying to correct other people. When you can't spell the word, it shows theat you don't understand the word. Second, elohim can be either singular (god) or plural) gods.
Aside from your incorrect and misspelled grammar lesson, what was your point?
paxpaul 1 month ago
That dude is total zero.what do you know about DNA,chromosomes and what they mean to you?You wanna be scientist talking about DNA and oh you know there is no God.Physics try to explain how the world works but when you leave matter and try to see something that has nothing to do with matter?You are a new age,psychedelic bullshit kid with no clue about what he talks.
AndreiDilaPsycho 1 month ago
Thats why he sent His Son to explain it to you. The bible speaks of chromosomes & DNA before anyone ever observed them read it This dudes just a newagesewage old babylon junk spouter.
skillitt1 1 month ago
@skillitt1 there is no spacedaddy and jesus is not god you moron shit. The bible does not speak about chromosomes and DNA, it speaks about slapping rapists on the hand and stoning people for gathering wood.
MyTheDarkKnight 1 month ago
@skillitt1 Ha ha! Where in the Bible, is there anything about DNA?
PDracco 1 month ago
Dr. Michio Kaku needs more than "Proof"! He needs to put aside rationalism a little bit. So clear a cut would come of a mind who do not discounts its limitations in relation to the sense of value or significance for life. Tsk, tsk, poor storming brain, so full of doubts and wants...
duartefilnetcabo 1 month ago
Comment removed
PDracco 1 month ago
EN MI CANAL ESTA ESTE MISMO VIDEO SUBTITULADO AL ESPAÑOL... DIFUNDAN CIENCIA
nahuelfantino 2 months ago
"UNLIKE ALL OTHER CREATURES ON THIS PLANET, WE ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO KNOW THAT OUR TIME IS LIMITED."
Um,...hmmm.... excuse me mr. but,.... HOW THE FUCK would you know what the rest of the creatures on this planet... know/feel about mortality?
What if they are better in tune with the world than we are??
Hack.
Sentidocomuncabron 2 months ago
@Sentidocomuncabron
well... I'm sure he means creatures that "consciously know that our time is limited". Other creatures have feelings sure, but they operate based solely on instinct. Not intellectual life beings.
jolohmm 2 months ago 5
@jolohmm i wouldn't say that. but its an alright theory :D
MrSherlockDomes 3 weeks ago
@jolohmm Thats true with one exception. Dolphins, dolphins speak using intelligent speech and they use tools. If you need proof of that just look up the experiment when they ran dolphin speech through whatever the name of that software is that can tell if a species is intelligent based on speech
Baronstone 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Well, I DO"...... i fuckin love Michio Kaku man
nahuelfantino 2 months ago
Comment removed
nahuelfantino 2 months ago
We all put tags on what we know to be true although we never push these tags aside when we are looking at the bigger picture,,, we as humans started monitoring time because we seen it as a pattern, the sun rose every day around the same time & set that very next evening we gave this process a name "time" although when you look at a term like "spacetime" it really does show how ignorant some scientists are to believe time is a fabric that can be bent & shaped, old words for new discoveries. Fail.
santirock69 2 months ago
I came to watch this post because of its intellectual value. I enjoyed this video very much but I came believe how ignorant some of the posts are. God couldn't create the Universe because there wasn't time before the Universe? Christians think its OK to kill babies? Quite the opposite. I consider myself middle of the road and accept that if God did create the universe that God himself is so complex that a human cannot fathom the complete depth of his being or the universe. Think people.
Raven5273 2 months ago
SO 1 INCH EQAULS 1000 YRS CANYON IS 1 MILE DEEP THAT EQUALS 63 ,THOUSAND INCHES ABOUT,,,,,,THATS HOW OLD THE CANYON IS,,,BUT DOES IT HOLD TRUE FOR REST OF PLANET
thebreze1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Greatest Scientific Explanation. The Spirit Lives! HEAVENLY FATHER HAS APPEARED AND HE WALKS AMONG US. Only the Creator Himself can reveal His vision as His own. All He reveals in his gift to humanity..// watch LA PAROLA IN CUATRO and merge with the greatest pronouncement and the highest science. Watch and rejoice..! it is He!! @ La Parola In Cuatro.
bortelliM 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexuality and homosexuality. Even non-religious people know this.
The homosexual agenda is not good for anyone, including those who consider themselves "gay".
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have successfuly framed themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 2 months ago
how can someone dismiss the fibonacci sequence its shows that everything is perfect in that sequence nottin appears to be random
mikeroweRules12 2 months ago
Believing in the Bible/QurAn inspired afterlife is DANGEROUS.
1.) Christian's heaven -dead babies go straight to heaven. That may justify INFANTICIDE. A person may kill babies as a heroic act to save mankind from the fires of hell. He would even say "I don't care if I go to hell, for as long as they're in heaven"
2.) Islamic Heaven -reward of 72 virgins, wine, etc.
That's why Muslim terrorist are not afraid to kill themselves. They're too horny to go to the afterlife (better sex).
MrFareddy 2 months ago
@MrFareddy
Lmao
wow0spec 1 month ago
actually we created time,, we just made it part of all of our lives,, other than famers.. it wasd made for agriculture..
ryanh2419 2 months ago
who knows what the song is at 3:11
Gregorick 2 months ago
no evidence for there being a creator
there is evidence for the laws of nature that can not be broken
coursaris 2 months ago
@coursaris lol
KTK401 2 months ago
time began at the big bang there was no time for god to create the universe in cause there was no time for him to create it in
coursaris 2 months ago
how was time created? answer = god
pkdavid 2 months ago
@pkdavid
how was god created? answer= OPTIMUS PRIME.
Hell YEAHHHHH!!! :D
RadSMeshhy 2 months ago 2
@pkdavid lol
nahuelfantino 2 months ago
Remarkable claims require remarkable proof! Maybe you don't need proof... well, I do!!
allaboutmath 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@allaboutmath fucking thumbs up
nahuelfantino 2 months ago
Comment removed
allaboutmath 3 months ago
Do you ever wonder why some ancient building are below current ground levels from where they were build. Why do archaeologist nearly always dig deep to find some ancients site or building that is only a few thousand years old not millions
ZeusHelios 3 months ago
@ZeusHelios
1) Most ancient buildings were built from heavy materials and ancient civilizations didn't know much about structural engineering and weights effect on ground. So a lower height than ground level has to do with the buildings weight and sinking over time.
Depending on the density and deterioration of minerals in the ground can determine how deep you need to go to see farther back in time.
FordGTGuy 3 months ago
@FordGTGuy Thanks
ZeusHelios 3 months ago
Perhaps the flood caused the earth to look older than it is Perhaps the gran cannon was cut out by the flood. I have noticed that nature works a lot quicker than we have been told. It is said it takes millions of years but I think it takes a lot less from what I see in nature.
ZeusHelios 3 months ago
@ZeusHelios
The deterioration caused to create the grand canyon would look nothing like it does today if it was caused by a single event, damage over time usually shows inconsistencies like all the turns and bends in the grand canyon while single event destruction shows a more uniform destruction, for instance a nuclear device makes uniform blast area from the center explosion.
FordGTGuy 3 months ago
@FordGTGuy I see Ok thanks for the answer.
ZeusHelios 3 months ago
For those who are saying 'do you know how dry it is in Arizona' blah blah. We are talking time on a scale of millions of years. Such a length of time that you can't even comprehend. Weather patterns have changed repeatedly over those millions of years, it wasn't always dry, even if the canyon was always as dry as it was continually for those millions of years the small amount of water running would still carve a crevasse of reasonable size.
Danielice92percent 3 months ago
In this video, I see Kaku learning about Geology. It's kind of weird to see someone of his knowledge caliber learning something new when he's always amazing many with his views on Physics. It's sort of a humbling experience to be so knowledgeable about something and know that there still is so much that we don't know.
AonGuardian 3 months ago
Wait, what?! This is the first time I've seen a video where 360p quality is BETTER than 720p...
AonGuardian 3 months ago
I think on the concept of re-birth the only scientific way leading toward it is, taking on a scientific atheistic materialistic world in which my consciousness is not real, its more of an illusion. I (consciousness) am merely a by-product of my brain. Consciousness is like an application, consciousness evolved because its much easier to have a commander of a spaceship than just people doing automatic jobs.
If I'm not real then there is no leap of faith required for me to experience life again
deanmullen10 3 months ago
@deanmullen10
Another way is that you could look at the accumulation of knowledge in your brain as energy(which in a way it is) and in science energy can neither be created or destroyed so you might not live forever as yourself but the energy that you carry with you till the day you die will carry on forever.
FordGTGuy 3 months ago
It's called 'Time' I believe - in particular 'Life Time' - second episode
tichondrius255 3 months ago
What is the name of the full docm. ? Please some one answer me?
FrenkieWilde 3 months ago
Remarkable claims require remarkable proof. An excellent Carl Sagan quote.
Kariakas 3 months ago
his voice is very calm. i can listen to his voice forever.
i wish i had a grandfather like him :))
vannpaul29 3 months ago
@vannpaul29 Would you let yourself be molested by a grandfather like him?
MrDebashishMohanty 3 months ago
@MrDebashishMohanty well,an intelligent person wont do that :)
vannpaul29 3 months ago
@vannpaul29 Not if your a really hot 14 year old sweet girl (or boy, depending on what tickles your fancy). You see my friend, in our modern day, sex can be used as a currency.
MrDebashishMohanty 3 months ago
@MrDebashishMohanty i'm hot and i think your not. and were not friends. LOL :)
vannpaul29 3 months ago
@MrDebashishMohanty whats yore problem get off michios back
dvarty100 3 months ago
@dvarty100 But my dick is still stuck in it (i.e. he's ass).
MrDebashishMohanty 3 months ago
but how good is his kunfu?
Streety101101 3 months ago
Wonder if these Advocates knew the Annual Rainfall in Colorado? Does all those Centuries Years of RainWater did all that Soil and Rock Erosion? Where did it go? Miles of Land on all sides of the Grand Canyon before the Pacific Ocean and Gulf of Mexico?!
benny8hill 3 months ago
@TheGetano1 And it has always been science to disprove bad science. That is why we demand evidence for positive claims.
rawrock24 3 months ago
I don't really ever write comments, but I am on this video. The world is not 6,000 years. The Bible does not even go by that. What we know is that God created the Earth... God also created Adam and Eve... Were they babies? No. Was the Earth a "baby?" All of the trees, rocks, etc... were they "babies?" Probably not. Moreover, The Bible also teaches one that Lucifer reigned on Earth... and this was before the creation of Adam and Eve.
Jorgiboy 3 months ago
@Jorgiboy wtf are you talking about?
1) where did you get "lucifer reigned on earth...before the creation of adam and eve"? ezekiel 18? not exactly what it says..
2) when you make statements like "what we know is that god created the earth..." and the ones that follow, are you even aware of the fact that these statements are seen by many, many people as unfounded assertions based upon ancient fears?
@benny8hill you're asking good questions - now do actual research and get real answers.
sonsofdon 3 months ago
@sonsofdon
1. Ezekiel 28: 11-23. Specifically, the end of 13 and 14.
2. I'm not going to lie, the Bible has some "crazy" stories, so I can definitely see why it's hard to believe. But it all has to be taken in by faith. If you want to go by facts, focus on the fact that Christianity has spread, is still growing, and find out why. Find out about what God has been doing in Africa (people being raised from the dead), what God is doing now in China. There is way too much evidence out there:)
Jorgiboy 3 months ago
@Jorgiboy your retarded.
ProphecyRJ 3 months ago
@ProphecyRJ Or maybe you are retarded!? Do you KNOW? What is knowledge? Answer that! Don't give the cookie stamp answer that everyone already "knows" in your hast to belittle or otherwise feel smarter. I mean, that would afterall be a bit "retarded," wouldn't it?! Forget the obvious surface, let's deep dive. I'm sure you will have help from others "jump" me. I'm excited.
9b8 3 months ago
@9b8 No, really... Your retarded for talking about complicated things that neither side can prove over youtube comments.
Lol.
ProphecyRJ 3 months ago
@ProphecyRJ If that makes you feel fresh and lovely inside, knock yourself out. But you went out of your way to say a two mere words, just to insult someone. THAT is "retarded" in my book, dumb ass. Look! See? I can insult you also. Yippie...but it doesn't really do much for me. You're just a little weasel looking to pick. But at least you didn't reply with some canned monkey assed aetheist ignorance! Applaud!
9b8 3 months ago
@9b8 Im not saying your retarded because I wish to insult you, but because your wasting your energy and you don't seem to realize it.
ProphecyRJ 3 months ago
@ProphecyRJ That's great. Who made the first comment? "your retarded." ... hmmmm. But we AGREE on something, sort of! My thoughts exactly, and the whole essence of my comment. Unfortunately, my effort was all for naught. Just be more respectful.
9b8 3 months ago
@9b8 Respect? I think you should not put your beliefs onto other people. You may believe what you want, every human has that freedom. But trying to convert people into believing what you believe is not 'respectful' in my eyes.
ProphecyRJ 3 months ago
@ProphecyRJ Aha! There WAS motive! You were being awfully wormy about it! First of all, "I" never put my belief ON you, but I understand you actually are generalizing religious people. I don't see where anyone (here at least) is bullying you, coercing you, or otherwise converting you to any particular belief; rather they are only testifying their own beliefs. But I agree that would be unfair. Same goes for anyone and any belief. And that does include atheists. I stand by my point: be respectful.
9b8 3 months ago
@Jorgiboy
1) sorry - i meant 28 actually. and i always loved this chapter and verses 13 and 14 in particular as an indictment of satan, though it is addressed to the king of tyre, who was "sealing up a pattern" by following satan's example. but it says that this 'pattern-maker', who is not named lucifer anywhere, was an 'anointed cherub' who was guarding the garden of eden, not ruling over it.
2) it does NOT "have to be taken in by faith"', and i do prefer facts. but...
sonsofdon 3 months ago
@Jorgiboy
2 (continued):
a) the spread of islam is more impressive by any measure, and neither proves anything about any god. i think you may need to take another look at "why"..
b) i'm saddened that you so easily believe (obviously on hearsay) that people are being raised from the dead, and then attribute that to a god who, if he existed as described, would easily be able to do that in places where there are videocameras at the ready.
sonsofdon 3 months ago
From the book of I, "Time is man-made, illusive. We live in a universe of motion, a celestial body moving around a sun. A new day isn't, it just always is."
pagayoyo9 3 months ago
For more on science & nature try books by top scientists; astronomer Victor J. Stenger, ' Fallacy of fine tuning ', Richard Dawkins, ' Unweaving the rainbow ' & ' The greatest show on earth ' & PZ Meyers & the website Talkorigins
zytigon 4 months ago
anyone know the name of the series this clip was taken from?
rd1999 4 months ago
@rd1999 Don't quote me on it, but It may be from his series Physics of the Impossible...
UrEpitaph 4 months ago
@thewayandwordoflife it might be true that hindu time scale is somewhat similar to scientific one but this does say that hinduism is the right way of life or its true,hinduism in mythology,some characters like rama even dont have historic proof,hinduism was contributed by selfish brahmins that is indian aryans for their own purpose,it is full of violence and inequality,on the other hand christianity have undeniable proofs see bible numerics and bible fulfilled prophecies,by the way i am indian
meultimatejohn 4 months ago
@TheWayandWordofLife What...
thatsnazzycornguy 4 months ago
the only religion that correctly tells us timescale of creation is hinduism. Watch carl sagan and hinduism.
pvasa20 4 months ago
I HOPE that some collegue calls this physics genius out on lying to everyone on this show. Don't ALL rivers carve away thousands of square miles of rock, leaving GINORMOUS Canyons surrounding them, after hundreds of thousands, and even millions of years??? ........ WHAT!?!?....They DON'T??? Why NOT? I mean, aren't there thousands of rivers around the world, that flow over the same kind of soil and rock??? Well, what's so different about the Colorado River- compared to several thousands of o
TheWayandWordofLife 4 months ago
Comment removed
SigurTibbs 4 months ago
@TheWayandWordofLife How about the simple explanation of Colorado river being older than the other ones? River basins don't always stay the same. Many things, like plate tectonics and climate change, affect them. The fact you seem ignorant to these factors kind of makes me question your ability to assess the amount of rock a river can consume in millions of years.
Strange how it's amusing and annoying at the same time when laymen deny years of research because it doesn't sound right to them.
tuoz1 4 months ago
This is just INSULTING, people!!! How gullible do these scientists think we are??? Arizona is one of the hottest, driest places on earth. The rocks of those canyon walls are so dry, and solid- it would take THE widest, deepest, most rapidly rushing river, to ever carve out even a small portion of the Grand Canyon's rock layer(s). Even then, it could only be a few yards WIDER than the WIDTH of the river's width. The Grand Canyon is literally thousands of square miles in area, and miles in
TheWayandWordofLife 4 months ago
The Colorado River would have to have originally been MILES WIDE, and had numerous points where it BRANCHED off into several other extremely WIDE river paths. If the Colo. River caused the ENORMOUSLY DEEP, AND WIDE Grand Canyon, WHY have not almost ALL other rivers CAUSED 'grand Canyon's as well??? Especially rivers that are much wider, deeper, and much FASTER FLOWING?.....THINK ABOUT IT People!..... Colorado, ( where I'm from), Arizona, New Mexico, Utah- are all VERY DRY CLIMATES, and have a
TheWayandWordofLife 4 months ago
@TheWayandWordofLife my god you are fucking stupid.
Ub3rSk1llz 4 months ago
Science and God are not incompatable, perhaps science and religion are. The belief that God doen not exist is still just a belief. There are many scientist who believe in God. The more I learn about science the more I believe in God. Many of the scientis on the cutting edge feel they are learning to understand God, not prove he doesn't exist. There are also many scientist who don't believe in God. What we do, or do not believe has no effect on whether God exist.
DISPENSER4HIRE 4 months ago
Many people believe in evolution even though they don't understand it.
Andytz100 4 months ago
When it comes to existence of GOD, scientists always work to be politically correct. They spent billions of dollars to create evidences to disprove existence of GOD, to no avail. Science tells us universe is infinite, but no prove, but they just "believe". They prefer to stick with the fairytale "evolution". Science has no answer for the existence of opposite sex in all living creatures, instinct behaviors, complex nature of living things (cell, brain, sperm, egg, etc.). Evolution is stupid
Andytz100 4 months ago
@Andytz100 science has not spent billions and billions of dollars to disprove god, because the existence of god is not testable and therefore insignificant, and impossible to prove or disprove. please show me 1 study funded by any top ranking science administration thats main purpose was to disprove god. sorry you won't find one, because there never was any. many scientists don't "believe" the universe is infinite, we have no proof that it is finite so for the time time we can't prove that its
Pager1991 4 months ago
@Andytz100 actually finite or finite. if we got all our science from the bible the average life span would still be in the mid 30's. remember that wars were fought with swords and shields merely 500 years ago, and now we have nuclear weapons. you really think technology is at its end and we'll never understand anything more? i feel sorry for you as you pose no hope in the human race, and serve only as an obstacle in the way of greater technology because you believe in a book.
Pager1991 4 months ago
religion is stupid.
deanosumo 4 months ago
my dog knew she would die, she chosed her place
ComeAndGetMeScum 4 months ago
@ComeAndGetMeScum every fully aquatic amphibian I've owned has crawled on to land to die(instinct?). My dog death was too sudden for that. But dogs are incredibly smarter and also can recognize other things dying. So what does it think when if it actually gets to see a person or another dog die?
Lesouder2222Music 4 months ago
@Lesouder2222Music How do i know. Im just saying that my dog knew that she would die and chosed the spot.
ComeAndGetMeScum 4 months ago
on a quantem levle as in the double slit exp. i feel that time is onlly the now as we are creating observers. the past and future are a perseption of the now
superauntyb 4 months ago
2 Corinthians 5:7 (KJV) For we walk by faith, not by sight
volcom204 4 months ago
@volcom204
The reason why you walk by faith and not by how it looks (or IS) is because 1) You have no good reason to believe what you believe and 2) How it looks (IS) brings you despair.
finalfantasy8911 4 months ago
@finalfantasy8911 I don't even know where to start. I walk by faith due to I believe in GOD and my hope is one day to met him. Seeing is not always believing if I went to a place that people never seen lets say a cow and I start talking to them about a cow why should they believe me that a cow even exist. I know I seen the cow but did the people I'm talking to seen a cow no so they put faith in me that I'm not telling a lie. You get at what I'm saying.
volcom204 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@finalfantasy8911 I don't even know where to start. I walk by faith due to I believe in GOD and my hope is one day to met him. Seeing is not always believing if I went to a place that people never seen lets say a cow and I start talking to them about a cow why should they believe me that a cow even exist. I know I seen the cow but did the people I'm talking to seen a cow no so they put faith in me that I'm not telling a lie. You get at what I'm saying.
volcom204 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@finalfantasy8911 I don't even know where to start. I walk by faith due to I believe in GOD and my hope is one day to met him. Seeing is not always believing if I went to a place that people never seen lets say a cow and I start talking to them about a cow why should they believe me that a cow even exist. I know I seen the cow but did the people I'm talking to seen a cow no so they put faith in me that I'm not telling a lie. You get at what I'm saying.
volcom204 4 months ago
I like to watch this videos....whether i believe in what they say or not....it creates a nice climate
AcctistaZ 4 months ago