Micael Holmstrom Scores a Controversial Shootout Goal

[MistaRaw23]

When someone else plays over 90min of hockey and the winning goal (1 in 2 back to back games IN THE HEAT), Come see me. Not to question any of my friends/other goalies play net all season...None would have done this and be "Just THAT DAMN GOOD". WOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Jewdacus]

I just know Showtime posted a shutout for the Happy Little Elves that day. Great job Show.

As for this goal, I didn't think it should have been controversial. I don't know how the move actually worked, but I guess if you have quick hands good things happen.

It should have counted in my book, but Showtime didn't get owned. He played a great game and other goalies would have lost before the shootout.

I know I'm a year late but just saw this.

[jimmything2681]

still holding onto that one, eh feldman?

[feldmania]

It was controversial because he pulls the ball backwards right after showtime dives (which unfortunately is the exact moment Shuie blocks the camera), so in a shootout the ball is dead when the player stops its motion and pulls it back. Goal should not of counted. And oh yeah, 2 other legit Rehabs goals weren't counted due to ref error. (one fast whistle and one missed internal crossbar hit)

[tacologic]

I like how BTSH Media has two shootout goals posted, and they're both of Rehab goalie getting owned.

[Lowadeckfynest]

I was the goalie and the fact that i BARELY play goal and it took a shootout to beat me tells you how well i did. ALSO as a back up replacement for another team and went 1 hour without a goal shows you something.

[sjcherno77]

Way to stand in the way Chewey

[enantiodrome]

What was "controversial" about this goal? The fact that it displayed skill and mastery and it smoked the goalie like a cheap cigar?