why does Paul have green eyes when the pre 67 Paul has brown eys and is published as having brown eyes? Did the real Paul really die and was he repleced?
@danahsutton101 It's very possible to replace someone if the double has enough practice and some minor cosmetic surgery. I've never been certain about it but never listen to the hardcore fans who think it's absolutely impossible to replace Paul. The differences are pretty obvious at times but they completely ignore it and insult you for bringing up the thing, so it's better to just not mention. I think it's either that Paul died and was replaced or had doubles which is common among celebrities.
This was the version that was used in The Compleat Beatles (yes, they spelled complete that way) made back in 1982. A lousy documentary, the production was terrible and disjointed.
This take shows the audience sort of dazed and disinterested, kinda like "Gee, we've done this before". They did. This is take 2. The first take is much better in my opinion.
@mwredit This version is my personal favorite, almost even more then the official studio recording. Specifically because of Paul McCartney's improvisational shout-out singing at - 4:21, 4:39, 5:17, 5:23, 5:26. What he does at those moments only exists in this recording and is really really good stuff that I wish was on the official studio track. Thats also why I want a higher quality recording of this track. Who do I have to go to get get one, EMI?
If there are two Pauls they both sound great. I hope the debate can continue and maybe the mystery can be solved.
danahsutton101 1 month ago 2
why does Paul have green eyes when the pre 67 Paul has brown eys and is published as having brown eyes? Did the real Paul really die and was he repleced?
danahsutton101 1 month ago 3
@danahsutton101 It's very possible to replace someone if the double has enough practice and some minor cosmetic surgery. I've never been certain about it but never listen to the hardcore fans who think it's absolutely impossible to replace Paul. The differences are pretty obvious at times but they completely ignore it and insult you for bringing up the thing, so it's better to just not mention. I think it's either that Paul died and was replaced or had doubles which is common among celebrities.
CRAZYLOLVIDS 1 month ago
1:01 <333 then lick them lips Oh Yeah! :3
FlyingSQUIRRILLLS 5 months ago
I love it when Mc Cartney puts that verse from The Band in the song, "Take a load off granny and put the load on me," magick is all this is!
Lenjia 6 months ago
muy muy muy grande!
chajafilas 1 year ago
all versions of "HEY JUDE" are great BEATLES FOREVER : ] luv from liverpool : ]
722erodz 1 year ago
By the way I recently found out there were actually 3 filmed recordings of this, the 3rd one is similar to this one but not as good
lander77477 1 year ago
This was the version that was used in The Compleat Beatles (yes, they spelled complete that way) made back in 1982. A lousy documentary, the production was terrible and disjointed.
This take shows the audience sort of dazed and disinterested, kinda like "Gee, we've done this before". They did. This is take 2. The first take is much better in my opinion.
mwredit 1 year ago
@mwredit This version is my personal favorite, almost even more then the official studio recording. Specifically because of Paul McCartney's improvisational shout-out singing at - 4:21, 4:39, 5:17, 5:23, 5:26. What he does at those moments only exists in this recording and is really really good stuff that I wish was on the official studio track. Thats also why I want a higher quality recording of this track. Who do I have to go to get get one, EMI?
lander77477 1 year ago
@lander77477 This is by far the best version, the screams are epic!!!!!
stonesfan1989 1 month ago
beautifuls 4:45 and 4:52
martino3105 2 years ago
For sayin u want a better picture this is pretty darn clear to me for bein from 1968.....U showin is this the master u have
Lehnerd57 2 years ago
Wow great find! 5 *****
Cazarellagaia 2 years ago