The Apollo mission left a laser reflector on the moon. The Myth Busters got their hands on a powerful laser and got a reflection back. If we never went to the moon then how did the laser reflector get to the moon? The video is on YouTube.
@jagger212121 existence of laser reflectors on the moon doesn't mean that man has gone there. it can be placed over there by a robot. think more carefully
There are "no stars" because the camera is exposed for shooting the lunar surface and the astronauts, not far away, tiny points of light. You just can't see them. The surface of the moon is really bright, and would take a "daylight" setting to photograph.
@1806jms The point about the stars, has been explained many times already. It is just one of those claims that seems to get brought back up even after it is well explained. DeadJesus100 has read the explanation many times by now. I and others have also suggested simple experiments he could do to verify the case for himself. At this point, I have concluded that even he doesn't believe the nonsense he is trying to sell to others. It could also be the result of a diseased mind.
the fact that even russia agrees that we went to the moon is proof enough... if they really wanted to shove it in our faces that it was fake after we beat them in the race, they would've disproved it... and if nasa really wanted to cover up that it was fake, the "proof" that everyone points out wouldn't be so "obvious"
important : they film continum 40 minuts the astronauts on the moon without air any supplay and they look like complete idiots without any target or mission ... watch below link
There aren't any stars for the same reason that the sky is washed out white in most of your stupid vacation pictures because camera exposes to the not so bright you, you dumb idiots! how bright is the star compared to the light being reflected from the moon while astronauts were walking on it. I even failed my physics class and get it. YOU ARE DUMB!
@DeadJesus100 hahaha u think that smartest scientist of their time would miss such a detail as starts when they try to fake moonlanding? have u ever used ur brain? even one of these guys is 100% smarter than u, and they would miss adding stars there? do u see starts at daylight when sun shines? even if the sky is clear? even when theres black background, there is sun shininh 247 to the moon, making the other lightsources fade from ur view. now go shoot ur self please.
We can see stars only when atmosphere exists. In moon it doesn't, so we can't see the stars, nothing but black actually. Since there is no air at the moon nothing can be moved on it;s own(like the usa flag). They astronauts made the flag look wavy.
And if the moon landing and all the stuff about the space was fake, then why should goverment, nasa and many more organisation should lie about it? To show off?
Those who believe moon landing was fake, they are total dumps with no sign of iq.
@nasaroytaki Actually the astronauts on the moon saw stars with their own eyes. The lack of photos showing up in NASA photos is because the cameras are set to image the astronauts and the surface features. If they set the exposure to show stars in the background, you'd lose all detail of the astronauts and surface and it would be just a washed out white blur.
Why weren't there any stars?? You idiot its because you can only see starlight when you aren't facing the sun, for it outshines all the others. And by the way, the flag was clearly motionless.
@iiRaiD take a photo outside at night in a brightly lit area, like a parking lot or a football game. See how many stars you can count in the photo. It's no different on the moon. The bright foreground surface of the moon washes out any stars in the sky.
@iiRaiD Oh sorry - I didn't actually watch or listen to the video. The CT's have been disproved time and time again. I'm just here to amuse myself with their stupid remarks! :)
@nopethegeek how can you be this sure? why u people always like to believe what the government tells u? they are a bunch of psychopaths lying to us all the time...
First you people try to claim that NASA was brilliant enough to fake the entire Apollo program, and then you turn around and claim they were stupid enough to forget stars among other things. Because obviously you conspiracy people know more about outerspace than NASA and the astronauts that have been there.
bloody hell...the flag looked like it was flapping because there was a piece of metal holding it up. nasa said so, and you can clearly see that in the video. nasa knows there isn't any atmosphere on the moon. jesus, you people are unbelievable
@Shane30794 Ad Onor del Vero l'uomo non e andato Ancora Sulla Luna!
Troverete le rivelarsi schiaccianti digitando su Google "Non abbiamo mai andati sulla Luna"
Se invece preferite continuare uno Credere Che Dodici Astronauti Americani Sono staticamente Sulla Luna, il destino Così puro! - Contenti Contenti TUTTI VOI! (... SOPRATTUTTO Quelli che vi Hanno sonoramente turlupinati -!! AH AH AH AH)
Ciao a tutti DALL'ITALIA E, se potete, cercate almeno di starmi bene!
I don't know about everything else, but the whole "no exhaust" thing - it seems to me that you wouldn't need a continuous stream of propulsion to escape the moon. It makes sense that there isn't any exhaust because the craft wouldn't need to continually propel itself as if it were on the Earth. That one burst of the thruster that you see in the video would be sufficient enough to launch the craft.
@alienfast The fuel is hypergolic, meaning it ignites on contact with the oxidiser, and most hypergolic fuels burn clear in a vacuum. This has been seen in other films and shorts of different rockets in the upper atmosphere.
Wow! If just being a conspiracy theorist validates being shot,what would happen to someone who actually commits a crime (in your world)??? lol! Thats a pretty radical thing to say!
I can really understand the frustration and in many cases anger people feel towards the "we never went to the moon" crowd. There is an anti-science attitude in the world today that appears to be dragging us towards a new darkages. People believe things that they can disprove just by day to day observations and yet they remain firm in these beliefs.
@samkoi56 we can... but it would be a waste of money to keep going back seeing that we've been in an economic decline ever since the apollo 17 mission... read up
@DeadJesus100 Shutup you dumbass. If you're going to support these idiotic, crackpot theories, at least sound sensible in defending said idiotic, crackpot theories.
@DeadJesus100 Take a look at the ISS photos(you don't believe that is fake, right? right....) Anyways, do you see stars in those photos? No, because the pright foreground washes out the background and thus doesn't pick up stars. Anything else?
Meanwhile back in the real world, a mission to map the gravity of the moon is just starting. Mapping gravity is an interesting thing to do because it shows the variations in density of the material inside the moon. There is some debate about whether after it formed, the moon remained hot long enough for all the heavy stuff to sink down towards the middle. There are lots of things more interesting than the idiot claims of the "we never went to the moon" nut bars.
The part I've never understood is the lunar module taking off (supposedly) from the Moon. If it takes enormous rockets and fuel and thrust to get off of Earth and push toward the Moon, then it would take an equal amount of rockets, fuel and thrust to GET BACK. And they didn't have it!!
@4624tone not even the soviets claimed it was fake... you'd think that the people in the space race would be saying that the US didn't land on the moon wouldn't you?
you're crazy if you think we didn't land on the moon lol
@SpazzK Crazy, crazy, lol...Think about that, You belive they shot a rocket, miles n miles x thousands away, then what, fell home, oh thats right, they had another billion dollar launch pad n fuel on moon...lol. LMFAO
@xander7ful Just look up escape velocity of the moon, compared to the escape velocity of the Earth, and consider.
Put simply, once free of the lunar gravity, they really did just fall back to Earth. Roughly 1/5th of the way back, Earth's gravity is stronger and simply pulls them in.
Please, before you come back with some snappy reply, just look this up. At the very least. It really does make sense.
Great argument, but the lunar module wasn't actually made to leave the gravitational pull of the moon. It launched into a lunar orbit where it joined back up with the command module, which was built to reach the speed of approximately 5,000 mph to travel the nearly 23,000 miles to escape the moons gravitational pull. Maybe you should look up some facts. Snappy reply?
@xander7ful There is no atmosphere on the moon, so much less resistance. Same with gravity. The moon is much smaller than the earth, and thus has much less gravity. My intermediate physics and chemistry class in highschool taught me this! Maybe you should've paid attention in those classes, assuming you're an adult and still believe in this conspiracy crap. I'm in highschool, and I completely don't believe in these stupid theories.
@acdcaaron23 I just come from a discussion with a bunch of idiots (sorry to be that unpolite) This ppl believe in secret aliens and at the same time is impossible to go to the moon? WTF!!! You are right, if one paid attention to highschool physics class one should know better. How can we argue with people who wouldn't solve a test of algebra! The people that believe it was a hoax if because they don't understand how it was done. Then they come and speak about Quantum Physics OMG :S
@xander7ful@xander7ful The gravity on the moon is 1/5th that of the earth plus no atmosphere means no wind resistance during the assent. A rocket leaving earth burns HALF its fuel to reach 1,000 mph because of the lower atmosphere density. This is why the space shuttles solid rocket boosters were only needed for the first 2 minutes of launch. MUCH less fuel is needed to liftoff from the moons surface. Rest of the fuel for the journey home was waiting for them in lunar orbit (command module).
@knowledgemonger You mention plastic at the end of your comment- and that is what shopping bags are made of. I remember doing laboratory experiments at university involving alpha, beta and gamma, and I was surprised to find how effective plastic was as a shield. ( We used cut up shopping bags as the target, increased the number of layers and recorded the results with a geiger counter). Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon in 1969.
@jimmytheblaze Yes, plastic stops gamma rays but not better than other stuff does. Charged particle radiation is stopped very effectively by plastics. Hydrogen atoms don't weigh very much but interact strongly with any charged particle that may come in. A few atoms thickness of a metal such as aluminum or gold on the surface, increases the interaction with any electromagnetic thing that comes along. However, gamma rays (rare) are generally too high for a thin layer to stop.
@knowledgemonger You have just contradicted yourself by now admitting that plastic stops gamma when your previous response states that I was wrong. During the same experiment with the plastic bags we tried lead (good shiled) concrete (good shield), wood (resonable shield), but were surprised to see how poorly Aluminium foil performed. Anyway, I'm just trying to quash the moon hoax crowd because I am sick of their flawed arguments and their 'Harry Potter hocus pocus' crap.
@jimmytheblaze I think you missed the main point in the comment. You said "a few plastic bags". That is not enough plastic to stop gamma rays. I was not disputing that enough plastic stops gamma rays. They don't matter to the Apollo mission but in other cases they do. Nearly all the other radiation can be stopped by plastic if you include a thin layer of metal on the surface. The UVC will also go through just a few plastic bags.
If it was a hoax then surely NASA would have faked the stars in the back ground, but no, there are none. Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon in 1969 -- fact, yes it's true.
Of course their are no stars to be seen. The reflection off the moon surface overwhelms any light from the stars. Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon in 1969.
Fact: A few plastic shopping bags can create an effective radiation shield (Gamma rays included). So imagine what NASA would have come up with in the 1960's when their budget was huge. Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon in 1969.
@jimmytheblaze You are wrong about the gamma rays part of that comment. It doesn't matter though because there are not enough of them in space to really worry about. Nearly all of the radiation can be stopped by a thin layer of metal on a sheet of plastic.
U person who believe in hoax are idiot u know nothing about the moon landing to prove its not real. just because jealous conspiracy theorists especially from Russia say some theory u will believe them?.U must STUDY ASTRONOMY and stop listening to conspiracy bullshit to know the real thing. WE'VE.BEEN THERE DONE THAT.
@DeadJesus100 WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ?
@DeadJesus100 I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...I get sick and repeat my
@DeadJesus100 Limpdicklessnessassclown I gotta know What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation ?
@Aeronauticalexplorer oh and you think you know better then everyone else? Your just as in the dark as every one else! YOU don't have the answer, so quite acting so self important.
It is hard to believe that there hasnt eeven been one moon landing but it sounds like there hasnt. This is why i hate Gov't they are stupid lying cheaps. I am doing a moon base thing for science and it is so intresting but you would think they would have more information on the subject of the moon if they have actually been there! enough said.
@billcollar3 I guess you are just probably not looking hard enough.
I suggest googling for 'Managing Space Radiation Risk in the New Era of Space Exploration'
and also 'A force field for astronauts' to get you started, as well as checking out the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal for comprehensive information about the 6 manned moon landings.
You CONSCPIRACY THEORI people didn´t believe in Saddam Hussein´s WMDs, the argument that saddam hussein was NOT less than 6 months from having an atomic bomb have already been 100% debunked. :-D
i personally have always thought that people thinking that nasa never landed on the moon represents a general lack of confidence and belief in many people. SUrely these people must consider there is always the chance they are wrong
@210482fmj surely you mjust consider there is a chance you are wrong and the entire thing was really a sham and the doubters in nazi nasa military missions were right all along.
Sorry, there is only so far my "belief" goes, we can easily say those who have blind "confidence" and "belief" in people are usually suckers to scam artists.
@NasaCriminals YOu probably wet the bed everytime you think about nasa exploring new worlds. YOU see it is people like you why nasa has concerns about human judgement ability in long distance space missions
"Why weren't there any stars?" Simply take any camera and set the exposure controls to what they would have set them to. (same shutter speed and aperture you'd set for any outdoor daytime photo) Then, take your camera out on a clear night, shoot a frame or two and see if any stars show up. I promise you they won't. I photograph stars often, and it takes at least a good 15 second exposure for stars to register.
@DarkFoxMedia yeah, whatever, and cosmic rays are deflected by tin foil. sure, I'm on the moon with no atmosphere, I'm out in space subjected to all the elements and I don't recall the stars. nice driveling on in your making up excuses as you go along logic too, sorry theres no santa claus either, I'm just a mean person, don't worry, I won't burn the flag....while you're looking.
oh yeah and the way they looked at each other in that press conference when the reporter asked about the stars and they were all scared like they were getting caught in a lie, priceless.... The stars are maginificent beyond words out in space ask any real astronaut, theses clowns sound then and now like military mind control idiots, those are your heros? where's buzz's moon critters, ufos and monoliths?
@MsMaggieOC I don't know if we went to the moon or not, I wasn't there. Personally, I don't care either way. The "lack of stars" argument only appeals to those who don't know any better, such as yourself. If you have a counter argument to my explanation I'd love to hear it. Even after 30 years of photography, I might learn something new.
@DarkFoxMedia The 'no stars bwuh?' argument just seems to come from people so relentlessly, agressively stupid that it would take a clue, wrapped around a brick, smashed repeatedly into their brains to even make them consider that they expect stars only because of fucking Star Wars films.
@DarkFoxMedia I'm not talking about the photography, I'm talking about the fact the astroNOTs knew there weren't going to be stars in NASA;s fake universe, none at all, which is stupid, so they said to a reporter they didn't recall seeing any stars while on the moon. The press conference is something you should really see, it's when they come back from whereever they actually went and act really really really strange.
@MsMaggieOC You said earlier that I had insulted your intelligence. I pointed out that I had given you a chance to demonstrate some and you had failed to do so. Here you again fail to demonstrate intelligence. People have pointed out the issue of exposure levels and dynamic range. With only a tiny bit of checking on your part you could have found out that stars can't be seen. You could even have thought of your own experience or done an experiment but no, you just blunder on.
@knowledgemonger Oh, yeah, because the astronots sound really credible right? They sound like a group of psychotic loons to me..and most people, why does the mainstreammedia give them a forum? Oh, and what exactly are the radiation levels on the moon and why didn't the astronauts gather evidence on radiation while they were there?NAZA is still figuring out about radiation in space but you're like 'radiation, no big deal!" Also, stars can be seen in space, give me a break.
@MsMaggieOC so now you are adding psychology to the long list of things you are demonstrating your ignorance of. You also just demonstrated your ignorance of the information on radiation gathered by the Apollo crew and by unmanned equipment before Apollo. For someone who tried complaining that I insulted your intelligence you sure don't take care to check stuff so that you appear to be smart. Google is free to use. You can do a little reading.
@knowledgemonger I don't need a phd to see that Buzz Aldren is off his rocker. And the apollo crew never gathered radiation when they were there you fucking liar. And naza, again is still gtrying to understand not only cosmic radiation, but how much radiation exactly is on the moon. go look it up, I think you need to do some up to date research and stop lying in order to sound like your an expert in something.
@MsMaggieOC So you think Buzz Aldren sounds sane? I think you're probably just as crazy as evidenced in "show me evidence that stars can be seen in space", lol.
Astronauts tell us about the stars which they see in space, why was apollo 11 an exception? and Again, why do you think they collected any kind of radiation data during those missions? they did not. go look it up.
I do beleive there's a conspiracy behind this but you're video is just annoying tbh , sounds , pics ,etc
dg8383 14 minutes ago
Sometimes I lay in my bed all day and pretend I'm a strawberry.
lhslions14 3 hours ago
"We never went to the Moon", I think the title meant to say, "We never went to physics class"
gloinstrong 7 hours ago
The Apollo mission left a laser reflector on the moon. The Myth Busters got their hands on a powerful laser and got a reflection back. If we never went to the moon then how did the laser reflector get to the moon? The video is on YouTube.
jagger212121 22 hours ago
@jagger212121 existence of laser reflectors on the moon doesn't mean that man has gone there. it can be placed over there by a robot. think more carefully
Shayanpac 24 minutes ago
@DeadJesus100 just stop well youre ahead kid just shut. the. hell. up.
sj176 3 days ago
There are "no stars" because the camera is exposed for shooting the lunar surface and the astronauts, not far away, tiny points of light. You just can't see them. The surface of the moon is really bright, and would take a "daylight" setting to photograph.
1806jms 4 days ago
@1806jms The point about the stars, has been explained many times already. It is just one of those claims that seems to get brought back up even after it is well explained. DeadJesus100 has read the explanation many times by now. I and others have also suggested simple experiments he could do to verify the case for himself. At this point, I have concluded that even he doesn't believe the nonsense he is trying to sell to others. It could also be the result of a diseased mind.
knowledgemonger 4 days ago
NAZI NASA IS THE JOKE OF HISTORY
NO STARS
APOLLO ZERO
DISNEY PRODUCTIONS
DeadJesus100 4 days ago
nice work brother let the lord jesus bless you the one the king of kings for this video exposing the lies of the devil the truth will prevail
257cks 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Coronal Mass Ejection is the smoking gun that exposes NASA lies.
NASA was very lucky between Dec. 1968 - Dec. 1972.
We could NOT detect life threatening CME until DEC. 1971.
Only two FAKED flights were made to the moon between Dec. 1971-72.
And after December 1972 NASA knew the gig was up.
NASA has not put a human beyond the safe zone (about 400 miles) in 40 years.
So the astroNOTs were very very very lucky, not one wanker came back complaining of headaches or any kind of radiation sickness?
islandbuoy4 5 days ago
does anyone else read DeadJesus100's comments and automatically picture a 12 yr old troll typing it up?
hammotox83 5 days ago
the fact that even russia agrees that we went to the moon is proof enough... if they really wanted to shove it in our faces that it was fake after we beat them in the race, they would've disproved it... and if nasa really wanted to cover up that it was fake, the "proof" that everyone points out wouldn't be so "obvious"
hammotox83 5 days ago
important : they film continum 40 minuts the astronauts on the moon without air any supplay and they look like complete idiots without any target or mission ... watch below link
MrVander78alex 6 days ago
watch? v=MunPi3ifqpw&feature=related
MrVander78alex 6 days ago
@MrVander78alex cant watch it?
jackvincent90 6 days ago
ok they claim NASA landing to the moon ..... what the hell do the astronauts..... they are look like complet idiots...... what was the mission..
MrVander78alex 6 days ago
Thumbs up if you didn't even bother to watch the thing and just came here to say what a dumbass the poster is.
Cowcharge 6 days ago
There aren't any stars for the same reason that the sky is washed out white in most of your stupid vacation pictures because camera exposes to the not so bright you, you dumb idiots! how bright is the star compared to the light being reflected from the moon while astronauts were walking on it. I even failed my physics class and get it. YOU ARE DUMB!
iodine333 1 week ago
@iodine333 Awww! Leave the CT's alone! Life is so much more fun for them when they can sit in their moms basement and concoct asinine bullshit! ;)
nopethegeek 5 days ago
@nopethegeek the mental retard TROLL, where are the stars on Nasa's Fake Apollo Mission dickhead?
DeadJesus100 4 days ago
@DeadJesus100 hahaha u think that smartest scientist of their time would miss such a detail as starts when they try to fake moonlanding? have u ever used ur brain? even one of these guys is 100% smarter than u, and they would miss adding stars there? do u see starts at daylight when sun shines? even if the sky is clear? even when theres black background, there is sun shininh 247 to the moon, making the other lightsources fade from ur view. now go shoot ur self please.
Jop3lius 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DeadJesus100 the mental retard TROLL, where are the stars on Nasa's Fake Apollo Mission dickhead?
.
the mental retard TROLL, where are the stars on Nasa's Fake Apollo Mission dickhead?
,
the mental retard TROLL, where are the stars on Nasa's Fake Apollo Mission dickhead?
Snap your elbow now.....hehehee
How's your knees?
staIkervisions 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DeadJesus100 the mental retard TROLL, where are the stars on Nasa's Fake Apollo Mission dickhead?
the mental retard TROLL, where are the stars on Nasa's Fake Apollo Mission dickhead?
sNAPPY SNAP OH MY GAWD....OH PLEEEASE PLEAASEE NNNNOOOOOO
staIkervisions 2 days ago
Great Video, I enjoyed it much. thanks,
740446 1 week ago
NASA DISNEY MOON LANDINGS FILMED ON PLANET EARTH
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pros & Con's people!
I'm tired of this bologna: YOU WANT ME & EVERYONE ELSE TO BE CONVINCED THEY WENT.?
THEN MAKE EM GO AGAIN.
WE WANT THEM TO RETURN. SHOW US YOU CAN GET BACK THERE & GO AGAIN!!
DEMAND IT. IF THEY DON'T GO.. THEY LIED.
Snowman374th 1 week ago
NO STARS IN SPACE
LOL
FUCK NAZI NASA
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
We can see stars only when atmosphere exists. In moon it doesn't, so we can't see the stars, nothing but black actually. Since there is no air at the moon nothing can be moved on it;s own(like the usa flag). They astronauts made the flag look wavy.
And if the moon landing and all the stuff about the space was fake, then why should goverment, nasa and many more organisation should lie about it? To show off?
Those who believe moon landing was fake, they are total dumps with no sign of iq.
nasaroytaki 1 week ago
@nasaroytaki is a mental retard Trolling youtube
Lol just read these morons comment, sicko
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
@nasaroytaki Actually the astronauts on the moon saw stars with their own eyes. The lack of photos showing up in NASA photos is because the cameras are set to image the astronauts and the surface features. If they set the exposure to show stars in the background, you'd lose all detail of the astronauts and surface and it would be just a washed out white blur.
nopethegeek 1 week ago
@nasaroytaki
So If I follow your logic If I leave the earth I wouldn't see stars anymore because of no atmosphere?
dg8383 4 minutes ago
Why weren't there any stars?? You idiot its because you can only see starlight when you aren't facing the sun, for it outshines all the others. And by the way, the flag was clearly motionless.
jffugly 1 week ago
There is video from a Japanese satellite going over the moon that shows the landing sites, honestly, get over it you conspiracy nuts.
bogmire777 1 week ago
Did we really go to the moon? did we ever land on the moon? why wern't there any stars?
iiRaiD 1 week ago
@iiRaiD take a photo outside at night in a brightly lit area, like a parking lot or a football game. See how many stars you can count in the photo. It's no different on the moon. The bright foreground surface of the moon washes out any stars in the sky.
nopethegeek 1 week ago
@nopethegeek i was coping the music buddy take a chill pill
iiRaiD 6 days ago
@iiRaiD Oh sorry - I didn't actually watch or listen to the video. The CT's have been disproved time and time again. I'm just here to amuse myself with their stupid remarks! :)
nopethegeek 6 days ago
@nopethegeek hahahahaha LOL
iiRaiD 6 days ago
The only moon hoax is the crap the CT's peddle. Remember CT's - just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not out to get you!
nopethegeek 1 week ago 2
@nopethegeek how can you be this sure? why u people always like to believe what the government tells u? they are a bunch of psychopaths lying to us all the time...
Shayanpac 20 minutes ago
Yes we did. Apollo 2-20 were fake.
MrMcMAGz 1 week ago
First you people try to claim that NASA was brilliant enough to fake the entire Apollo program, and then you turn around and claim they were stupid enough to forget stars among other things. Because obviously you conspiracy people know more about outerspace than NASA and the astronauts that have been there.
durkadurka2323 1 week ago
@durkadurka2323 Its not that... its that its lonely for the CTs living in mommys basement.
nopethegeek 1 week ago
@nopethegeek bet you live in your mommys basement monkey boy.
Where were the stars dipshit?
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
@DeadJesus100 The stars are up your ass, TOUGH GUY! If you shove your head up there just a LITTLE further, I'm sure you'll see them!
nopethegeek 1 week ago
Comment removed
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
@nopethegeek Go suck your brothers cock retard
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
@DeadJesus100 Does mommy know you're on her computer? Why don't you go play in traffic?
nopethegeek 1 week ago
bloody hell...the flag looked like it was flapping because there was a piece of metal holding it up. nasa said so, and you can clearly see that in the video. nasa knows there isn't any atmosphere on the moon. jesus, you people are unbelievable
Barbious 1 week ago 2
The thumbnail hits it right on the head.
The various directions the shadows go from the astronaunt, flag, and spacecraft.
MegaSlaze 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MegaSlaze "The various directions the shadows go from the astronaunt, flag, and spacecraft."
Have you never seen a photograph where parallel objects appear to converge? Railway lines?
Multiple light sources would produce multiple shadows.
Why do I even need to point this out? It should be obvious.
TheBaldmeister 1 week ago
APOLLO NAZI FAKE MOON LANDINGS
Nasa is the Joke of History
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
fucking idiot music.
denton241 2 weeks ago
and we still didnt beat the russians and we cheated WTF
ImMajorMongoose 2 weeks ago
@ImMajorMongoose The US NWO Government stole $70Billion from the US taxpayers when they faked the moon landings, thats all that mattered
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
Thumbs up if you muted this video
Shane30794 2 weeks ago 25
@Shane30794 Ad Onor del Vero l'uomo non e andato Ancora Sulla Luna!
Troverete le rivelarsi schiaccianti digitando su Google "Non abbiamo mai andati sulla Luna"
Se invece preferite continuare uno Credere Che Dodici Astronauti Americani Sono staticamente Sulla Luna, il destino Così puro! - Contenti Contenti TUTTI VOI! (... SOPRATTUTTO Quelli che vi Hanno sonoramente turlupinati -!! AH AH AH AH)
Ciao a tutti DALL'ITALIA E, se potete, cercate almeno di starmi bene!
Ettore
ettoremazza7 12 hours ago
Ahhhh you conspiracy crazies are entertaining, thanks for the laugh :)
frogjezz 2 weeks ago 2
@frogjezz the brainwashed human monkey drinking the Nasa coolaid
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
Comment removed
nopethegeek 1 week ago
Boy, what a soundtrack. Having sat through the entire thing, I feel I have traveled to the Moon and back .. in a tin can. Epic head-fuck.
meatformoney 2 weeks ago
@meatformoney lol Nasa is a head fuck. The Toy Lem was a tin can
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
I don't know about everything else, but the whole "no exhaust" thing - it seems to me that you wouldn't need a continuous stream of propulsion to escape the moon. It makes sense that there isn't any exhaust because the craft wouldn't need to continually propel itself as if it were on the Earth. That one burst of the thruster that you see in the video would be sufficient enough to launch the craft.
alienfast 3 weeks ago
@alienfast The fuel is hypergolic, meaning it ignites on contact with the oxidiser, and most hypergolic fuels burn clear in a vacuum. This has been seen in other films and shorts of different rockets in the upper atmosphere.
krisdevalle 3 weeks ago
@alienfast the exhaust thing was minor compare to the no stars in space thing
Fuck Nasa
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
say I if you want to kill ppl who dont believe that we went to the moon.
azureflame2411 3 weeks ago
@azureflame2411
I .
You mean Aye I think.
But yes, everyone that claims the Apollo missions were faked should be killed they are Rah-tards.
Blahblobify 2 weeks ago
Wow! If just being a conspiracy theorist validates being shot,what would happen to someone who actually commits a crime (in your world)??? lol! Thats a pretty radical thing to say!
toffeetigerkimba 2 weeks ago
@toffeetigerkimba Obviously, they should be shot twice. :)
I can really understand the frustration and in many cases anger people feel towards the "we never went to the moon" crowd. There is an anti-science attitude in the world today that appears to be dragging us towards a new darkages. People believe things that they can disprove just by day to day observations and yet they remain firm in these beliefs.
knowledgemonger 2 weeks ago
@Blahblobify the apollo troll is mentally retarded
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
@azureflame2411 Nasa have killed people who wanted to expose the FAKE MOON LANDINGS
Guss Grissom was one of them
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
@DeadJesus100 Proof?
nopethegeek 1 week ago
@azureflame2411 you can't kill people that are already brain dead.
nopethegeek 1 week ago
@samkoi56 maybe because you were born! LOL
azureflame2411 3 weeks ago
110% fake moon landing. If 1969 Nasa landed on the moon, why they can't go back again with today's most advance technology?
samkoi56 3 weeks ago
@samkoi56 we can... but it would be a waste of money to keep going back seeing that we've been in an economic decline ever since the apollo 17 mission... read up
hammotox83 5 days ago
NO STARS IN NASA'S FAKE UNIVERSE
DeadJesus100 3 weeks ago
Why did I even waste a view by clicking on this?
acdcaaron23 3 weeks ago
@acdcaaron23
Nasa mickey mouse moon landings
DeadJesus100 3 weeks ago
@DeadJesus100 Shutup you dumbass. If you're going to support these idiotic, crackpot theories, at least sound sensible in defending said idiotic, crackpot theories.
acdcaaron23 3 weeks ago 2
@acdcaaron23 where were the stars on nasa's fake apollo missions fuckhead?
DeadJesus100 1 week ago
@DeadJesus100 Take a look at the ISS photos(you don't believe that is fake, right? right....) Anyways, do you see stars in those photos? No, because the pright foreground washes out the background and thus doesn't pick up stars. Anything else?
acdcaaron23 1 week ago
@DeadJesus100 take a photo of someone standing outside under a bright streetlight. Let us know how many stars show up in your photo.
nopethegeek 1 week ago
Meanwhile back in the real world, a mission to map the gravity of the moon is just starting. Mapping gravity is an interesting thing to do because it shows the variations in density of the material inside the moon. There is some debate about whether after it formed, the moon remained hot long enough for all the heavy stuff to sink down towards the middle. There are lots of things more interesting than the idiot claims of the "we never went to the moon" nut bars.
knowledgemonger 3 weeks ago
FAKING IT TO THE FUCKING MOON
NASA NAZI SCUM
DeadJesus100 3 weeks ago
fuck lil wayne.
CHRYSALISYUPSWON 3 weeks ago
The part I've never understood is the lunar module taking off (supposedly) from the Moon. If it takes enormous rockets and fuel and thrust to get off of Earth and push toward the Moon, then it would take an equal amount of rockets, fuel and thrust to GET BACK. And they didn't have it!!
xander7ful 4 weeks ago
@xander7ful lol, exactly man, great comment, like they just fell back to earth..It was a stunt to fool russia during cod war, that it.
4624tone 3 weeks ago
@4624tone not even the soviets claimed it was fake... you'd think that the people in the space race would be saying that the US didn't land on the moon wouldn't you?
you're crazy if you think we didn't land on the moon lol
SpazzK 3 weeks ago
@SpazzK Crazy, crazy, lol...Think about that, You belive they shot a rocket, miles n miles x thousands away, then what, fell home, oh thats right, they had another billion dollar launch pad n fuel on moon...lol. LMFAO
4624tone 3 weeks ago
@xander7ful Oh, that's easy: Gravity and atmosphere density. Do you need it explained how the Earth's isn't the same as the Moon's?
Yes, I'm sure your doing a "Face Palm" about now so no worries :)
BadBunnyRides 3 weeks ago 2
@xander7ful Just look up escape velocity of the moon, compared to the escape velocity of the Earth, and consider.
Put simply, once free of the lunar gravity, they really did just fall back to Earth. Roughly 1/5th of the way back, Earth's gravity is stronger and simply pulls them in.
Please, before you come back with some snappy reply, just look this up. At the very least. It really does make sense.
krisdevalle 3 weeks ago
Great argument, but the lunar module wasn't actually made to leave the gravitational pull of the moon. It launched into a lunar orbit where it joined back up with the command module, which was built to reach the speed of approximately 5,000 mph to travel the nearly 23,000 miles to escape the moons gravitational pull. Maybe you should look up some facts. Snappy reply?
comical2me 3 weeks ago
@xander7ful There is no atmosphere on the moon, so much less resistance. Same with gravity. The moon is much smaller than the earth, and thus has much less gravity. My intermediate physics and chemistry class in highschool taught me this! Maybe you should've paid attention in those classes, assuming you're an adult and still believe in this conspiracy crap. I'm in highschool, and I completely don't believe in these stupid theories.
acdcaaron23 3 weeks ago 11
@acdcaaron23 I just come from a discussion with a bunch of idiots (sorry to be that unpolite) This ppl believe in secret aliens and at the same time is impossible to go to the moon? WTF!!! You are right, if one paid attention to highschool physics class one should know better. How can we argue with people who wouldn't solve a test of algebra! The people that believe it was a hoax if because they don't understand how it was done. Then they come and speak about Quantum Physics OMG :S
joaq1999 1 day ago
Comment removed
nopethegeek 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xander7ful @xander7ful The gravity on the moon is 1/5th that of the earth plus no atmosphere means no wind resistance during the assent. A rocket leaving earth burns HALF its fuel to reach 1,000 mph because of the lower atmosphere density. This is why the space shuttles solid rocket boosters were only needed for the first 2 minutes of launch. MUCH less fuel is needed to liftoff from the moons surface. Rest of the fuel for the journey home was waiting for them in lunar orbit (command module).
nopethegeek 1 week ago
@knowledgemonger You mention plastic at the end of your comment- and that is what shopping bags are made of. I remember doing laboratory experiments at university involving alpha, beta and gamma, and I was surprised to find how effective plastic was as a shield. ( We used cut up shopping bags as the target, increased the number of layers and recorded the results with a geiger counter). Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon in 1969.
jimmytheblaze 1 month ago
@jimmytheblaze Yes, plastic stops gamma rays but not better than other stuff does. Charged particle radiation is stopped very effectively by plastics. Hydrogen atoms don't weigh very much but interact strongly with any charged particle that may come in. A few atoms thickness of a metal such as aluminum or gold on the surface, increases the interaction with any electromagnetic thing that comes along. However, gamma rays (rare) are generally too high for a thin layer to stop.
knowledgemonger 1 month ago
@knowledgemonger You have just contradicted yourself by now admitting that plastic stops gamma when your previous response states that I was wrong. During the same experiment with the plastic bags we tried lead (good shiled) concrete (good shield), wood (resonable shield), but were surprised to see how poorly Aluminium foil performed. Anyway, I'm just trying to quash the moon hoax crowd because I am sick of their flawed arguments and their 'Harry Potter hocus pocus' crap.
jimmytheblaze 1 month ago
@jimmytheblaze I think you missed the main point in the comment. You said "a few plastic bags". That is not enough plastic to stop gamma rays. I was not disputing that enough plastic stops gamma rays. They don't matter to the Apollo mission but in other cases they do. Nearly all the other radiation can be stopped by plastic if you include a thin layer of metal on the surface. The UVC will also go through just a few plastic bags.
knowledgemonger 4 weeks ago
If it was a hoax then surely NASA would have faked the stars in the back ground, but no, there are none. Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon in 1969 -- fact, yes it's true.
jimmytheblaze 1 month ago
Of course their are no stars to be seen. The reflection off the moon surface overwhelms any light from the stars. Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon in 1969.
jimmytheblaze 1 month ago
Fact: A few plastic shopping bags can create an effective radiation shield (Gamma rays included). So imagine what NASA would have come up with in the 1960's when their budget was huge. Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon in 1969.
jimmytheblaze 1 month ago
@jimmytheblaze You are wrong about the gamma rays part of that comment. It doesn't matter though because there are not enough of them in space to really worry about. Nearly all of the radiation can be stopped by a thin layer of metal on a sheet of plastic.
knowledgemonger 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
U person who believe in hoax are idiot u know nothing about the moon landing to prove its not real. just because jealous conspiracy theorists especially from Russia say some theory u will believe them?.U must STUDY ASTRONOMY and stop listening to conspiracy bullshit to know the real thing. WE'VE.BEEN THERE DONE THAT.
tobyYaphetS 1 month ago
well im convinced now. NOT
TheeJimboski 1 month ago
APOLLO DISNEY MOON LANDINGS
NO STARS
JUST WIRES
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 STFU TROLL ...Take your MEDS ASS_HOLE STFU TROLL ...Take your MEDS ASS_HOLE STFU TROLL ...Take your MEDS ASS_HOLE STFU TROLL ...Take your MEDS ASS_HOLE STFU TROLL ...Take your MEDS ASS_HOLE STFU TROLL ...Take your MEDS ASS_HOLE STFU TROLL ...Take your MEDS ASS_HOLE STFU TROLL ...Take your MEDS ASS_HOLE STFU TROLL ...Take your MEDS ASS_HOLE STFU TROLL ...Take your MEDS ASS_HOLE STFU TROLL ...Take your MEDS ASS_HOLE
staIkervisions 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DeadJesus100 I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...
I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...
I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...
I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...
I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...
when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole
staIkervisions 1 month ago
you know they probably just did this to prove the russians that we were there first, and then later we actually went.
ThePencil901 1 month ago
@ThePencil901 No man has ever been to the moon, no man has ever been 400 miles from earth
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ? WHY ARE YOU rETarDEd ?
staIkervisions 1 month ago
MAN ON THE DISNEY TV MOON
NO STARS
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Troll-tard. when you get further then a 1st Grade education, come on back and post some more.
BadBunnyRides 1 month ago
@BadBunnyRides Take your medication retard
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 awe, poor troll tard is upset.
BadBunnyRides 1 month ago 2
@DeadJesus100 YOU ARE A BUbBa FucKStIcK YOU doNT KNOPw SHIT
YOU RE QUEER ITS ok YOU ARE A BUbBa FucKStIcK YOU doNT KNOPw SHIT
YOU RE QUEER ITS ok YOU ARE A BUbBa FucKStIcK YOU doNT KNOPw SHIT
YOU RE QUEER ITS ok YOU ARE A BUbBa FucKStIcK YOU doNT KNOPw SHIT
YOU RE QUEER ITS ok YOU ARE A BUbBa FucKStIcK YOU doNT KNOPw SHIT
YOU RE QUEER ITS ok
staIkervisions 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...I get sick and repeat myself when I see your idiotic spam ass-hole ..I puke ..Then...I get sick and repeat my
staIkervisions 1 month ago
This conspiracy crap is simply ridiculous. It just shows how stupid these people, such as the producer of this clip, really are.
jarviss64 1 month ago
@jarviss64 Wow that was deep. Idiot.
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 month ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Lmao :)
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
We Never went to the Moon.
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 month ago
NO STARS IN NASA'S FAKE AP[OLLO UNIVERSE
Nasa Fake Science
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Limpdicklessnessassclown I gotta know What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation What kind of radiation ?
beta,alpha,gamma?
staIkervisions 1 month ago
@staIkervisions the apollo troll has brain damage LOL
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
youd have to be a total fuckin moron to think the moon landings were real. eat shit and kill yourselves
MrToiletface 1 month ago
@MrToiletface shut up troll! You're a waste of space and thought!
Arbitr0n 1 month ago
@Arbitr0n You are the fucking troll retard
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 and why may I ask is going to the moon so hard to believe for you people?
Arbitr0n 1 month ago
@Arbitr0n Because we dont believe in bullshit like you do.
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 month ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer oh and you think you know better then everyone else? Your just as in the dark as every one else! YOU don't have the answer, so quite acting so self important.
Arbitr0n 1 month ago
@Arbitr0n Man fuck that shit
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 month ago
@MrToiletface Great comment
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
It is hard to believe that there hasnt eeven been one moon landing but it sounds like there hasnt. This is why i hate Gov't they are stupid lying cheaps. I am doing a moon base thing for science and it is so intresting but you would think they would have more information on the subject of the moon if they have actually been there! enough said.
billcollar3 1 month ago
@billcollar3 I guess you are just probably not looking hard enough.
I suggest googling for 'Managing Space Radiation Risk in the New Era of Space Exploration'
and also 'A force field for astronauts' to get you started, as well as checking out the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal for comprehensive information about the 6 manned moon landings.
krisdevalle 1 month ago
@billcollar3 the US government is the NWO
A bunch of lying thieving criminals
and krisdevalle is an apollo idiot troll better known as a shill trying
to spam government lies on youtube
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
You CONSCPIRACY THEORI people didn´t believe in Saddam Hussein´s WMDs, the argument that saddam hussein was NOT less than 6 months from having an atomic bomb have already been 100% debunked. :-D
Fridaey13txhOktober 1 month ago
NASA APOLLO BULLSHIT
SEND THE APOLLO ASTRONAUT TRAITORS TO PRISON
NasaCriminals 1 month ago
The fact of the matter is indeed that they FAKED the Moon landings. No one can logically refute the facts.
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 month ago
NO STARS IN NASA'S DISNEY UNIVERSE *
Nasa is a Universal Joke
NasaCriminals 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep him talking. Have some fun with him, but don't waste your time on him
210482fmj 1 month ago
Comment removed
210482fmj 1 month ago
APOLLO DISNEY SPACE HAS NO STARS
Nasa is a fucking joke
NasaCriminals 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People haven't dropped this hoax theory bullshit yet?
Laurelindo 1 month ago
Comment removed
Laurelindo 1 month ago
Actually, humans went to the moon, thousands of years before the 1960s.
Fridaey13txhOktober 1 month ago
@Fridaey13txhOktober what are you smoking dude ? :)
NasaCriminals 1 month ago
I suspect this today isn´t the first "technological" civilization and that there was at least one other, which was destroyed and not so by accident.
Fridaey13txhOktober 1 month ago
this video is more far fetched then religion
TheSimpleFighters 1 month ago in playlist space moon
@TheSimpleFighters Nasa Fake Science is Religion
NasaCriminals 1 month ago
it was because of the Decepticons you idiots
itzkolpi 1 month ago
i personally have always thought that people thinking that nasa never landed on the moon represents a general lack of confidence and belief in many people. SUrely these people must consider there is always the chance they are wrong
210482fmj 1 month ago
@210482fmj surely you mjust consider there is a chance you are wrong and the entire thing was really a sham and the doubters in nazi nasa military missions were right all along.
Sorry, there is only so far my "belief" goes, we can easily say those who have blind "confidence" and "belief" in people are usually suckers to scam artists.
MsMaggieOC 1 month ago
@MsMaggieOC Have you ever taken lsd by any chance
210482fmj 1 month ago
@210482fmj have you wet your bed again kid
NasaCriminals 1 month ago
@NasaCriminals is a man who's not very intelligent
210482fmj 1 month ago
@NasaCriminals YOu probably wet the bed everytime you think about nasa exploring new worlds. YOU see it is people like you why nasa has concerns about human judgement ability in long distance space missions
210482fmj 1 month ago
landed in the area 51
mamdkrushasidfij 1 month ago
"Why weren't there any stars?" Simply take any camera and set the exposure controls to what they would have set them to. (same shutter speed and aperture you'd set for any outdoor daytime photo) Then, take your camera out on a clear night, shoot a frame or two and see if any stars show up. I promise you they won't. I photograph stars often, and it takes at least a good 15 second exposure for stars to register.
DarkFoxMedia 1 month ago
@DarkFoxMedia yeah, whatever, and cosmic rays are deflected by tin foil. sure, I'm on the moon with no atmosphere, I'm out in space subjected to all the elements and I don't recall the stars. nice driveling on in your making up excuses as you go along logic too, sorry theres no santa claus either, I'm just a mean person, don't worry, I won't burn the flag....while you're looking.
MsMaggieOC 1 month ago
oh yeah and the way they looked at each other in that press conference when the reporter asked about the stars and they were all scared like they were getting caught in a lie, priceless.... The stars are maginificent beyond words out in space ask any real astronaut, theses clowns sound then and now like military mind control idiots, those are your heros? where's buzz's moon critters, ufos and monoliths?
MsMaggieOC 1 month ago
@MsMaggieOC I don't know if we went to the moon or not, I wasn't there. Personally, I don't care either way. The "lack of stars" argument only appeals to those who don't know any better, such as yourself. If you have a counter argument to my explanation I'd love to hear it. Even after 30 years of photography, I might learn something new.
DarkFoxMedia 1 month ago
@DarkFoxMedia The 'no stars bwuh?' argument just seems to come from people so relentlessly, agressively stupid that it would take a clue, wrapped around a brick, smashed repeatedly into their brains to even make them consider that they expect stars only because of fucking Star Wars films.
krisdevalle 1 month ago
@DarkFoxMedia I'm not talking about the photography, I'm talking about the fact the astroNOTs knew there weren't going to be stars in NASA;s fake universe, none at all, which is stupid, so they said to a reporter they didn't recall seeing any stars while on the moon. The press conference is something you should really see, it's when they come back from whereever they actually went and act really really really strange.
MsMaggieOC 1 month ago
@MsMaggieOC Maybe you could take a look at some videos taken from the space station windows and see if there are stars there.
krisdevalle 1 month ago
@MsMaggieOC You said earlier that I had insulted your intelligence. I pointed out that I had given you a chance to demonstrate some and you had failed to do so. Here you again fail to demonstrate intelligence. People have pointed out the issue of exposure levels and dynamic range. With only a tiny bit of checking on your part you could have found out that stars can't be seen. You could even have thought of your own experience or done an experiment but no, you just blunder on.
knowledgemonger 1 month ago
@knowledgemonger Oh, yeah, because the astronots sound really credible right? They sound like a group of psychotic loons to me..and most people, why does the mainstreammedia give them a forum? Oh, and what exactly are the radiation levels on the moon and why didn't the astronauts gather evidence on radiation while they were there?NAZA is still figuring out about radiation in space but you're like 'radiation, no big deal!" Also, stars can be seen in space, give me a break.
MsMaggieOC 1 month ago
@MsMaggieOC so now you are adding psychology to the long list of things you are demonstrating your ignorance of. You also just demonstrated your ignorance of the information on radiation gathered by the Apollo crew and by unmanned equipment before Apollo. For someone who tried complaining that I insulted your intelligence you sure don't take care to check stuff so that you appear to be smart. Google is free to use. You can do a little reading.
knowledgemonger 1 month ago
@knowledgemonger I don't need a phd to see that Buzz Aldren is off his rocker. And the apollo crew never gathered radiation when they were there you fucking liar. And naza, again is still gtrying to understand not only cosmic radiation, but how much radiation exactly is on the moon. go look it up, I think you need to do some up to date research and stop lying in order to sound like your an expert in something.
MsMaggieOC 1 month ago
@MsMaggieOC So you think Buzz Aldren sounds sane? I think you're probably just as crazy as evidenced in "show me evidence that stars can be seen in space", lol.
Astronauts tell us about the stars which they see in space, why was apollo 11 an exception? and Again, why do you think they collected any kind of radiation data during those missions? they did not. go look it up.
MsMaggieOC 1 month ago
@MsMaggieOC Here is the data on the radiation measurement for all Apollo missions. If you are interested, remove the spaces from this url.
lsda. jsc. nasa. gov / books/ apollo/ s2ch3. ht m
krisdevalle 1 month ago
@krisdevalle hey you sick gay freak
Nasa Propaganda Data?
NasaCriminals 1 month ago