Em 1997, uma garota chamada Lauren estava caminhando em uma floresta, e de repente desapareceu, ninguém nunca encontrou-a até 2000, quando uma outra menina chamada Maria encontrou o corpo e marcas em seu peito, disseram: Não era bonita o suficiente "e, agora, você leu isso, ela aparecerá em seu espelho dizendo que você não é bonito o suficiente e matá-lo! (pela forma como o menina chamada Mary morreu pouco depois) Para se salvar colar este para 5 outros videos
He's being filmed from below and he's on a massive hill. The surface topography is faint because it's all white, but you can see the angles of the terrain. On that terrain the movement looks normal. Anyone can recreate that kind of footage on a steep hill, if you then remove all references, like background and sky, then the movement can to some look odd, as in this footage. This is a tiny fragment of one of the many movies that prove man walked on the moon.
If it was a hoax, hundreds of thousands of people involved in the Apollo missions would have to keep it a secret. Even with all of America's civil servants and bureaucrats the paper work would be impossible!
@ZombieTom haha, why EXACTLY would it take hundreds of thousands to film a couple movies in a small hangar???????? This argument gets used SOOO much by you stupid propagandists.
Hey, what's with the flaming? I just commented on what I see and hear. I have not drawn any conclusions, just made an observation. Please read my comment before making yours.
@ 1992photographer. I do not see the box hit his leg.
@YDDES how come you don't hear the hammer land in this famous staged and rehearsed footage reinacting Galleleos experiment?
the box hit his leg. Why are you guys over-analyzing everything? Appreciate what YOUR TAX DOLLARS help mankind to achieve. Stop being little pussies. And how the hell are you guys talking about Disney? Holy Shit. STFU.
It's spelled "really." And write "you" not "u." You are clearly not the type interested in any discussion on this topic. I can smell self important, stuck up know it all's from a miles distance.
@videoneptune If that sound relly IS from the landing box (not proven) it's not so surprising, since soundwaves travel through any matter. Here: The ground, the astronauts foot and up to the mike in his helmet.
@videoneptune yeah it's incredible. You'd think NASA scientists would realize this obvious flaw and edit out the sound. I guess you've outsmarted the NASA scientists... incredible. You should publish a research paper or something.
I believe this is caused by the Air INSIDE his suit. The microphone was mounted inside the astronauts suit, so when the box hit the suit the sound was transferred via the air molecules in the astronauts suit.
The conspiracy theorist clearly know what it's like wearing a spacesuit on the moon. Therefore, they must be right. Give it up. Humans have been to the moon.
Another thing I love America, but America is the land of make believe...Nobody sales the world better then America through the vice of a TV...We all grew up believing Charles Manson was this brutal murder, rather he was just some bum with a mouth, who never did the killing yet he gets all the glory, why? cause he fit the part the best. Disneyland help build NASA. TV is one fucked up thing, People believe it way to much...
@UgLyKoerner Whatever USA is and does, the lunar landings can't have been faked. It's not just about photos and films impossible to fake in the 60's. It's also about the tracking of the spaceships by many independent sources, the thousands of involved people and the recent photos by lunar satellites.
I trust the scientist more than I trust those selling hoax-books and videos to the ignorants.
@YDDES I guess it just blows me away that we don't see this on TV ever...although I am guessing it's cause the poor video quality...Just even bad quality or not, I never see anything on dicovery chennel about it...To me this should be a yearly show. Maybe I need to look harder. Like I said it does seem weird to fake somthing and fake it like 6 times...But I just aint sold on this old footage. I also trust those who are scientist No one mentions moon landing s at all on any of the science shows.
@UgLyKoerner Then You must look at the wrong shows, or at the wrong times. I have seen a lot about the lunar landings and other space projects through the years.
Just yesterday they mentioned on TV, that by analyzing, with modern methods, the information gathered by the seismological instruments placed by the astronauts, scientists have determined than the Moon has a dense iron core, surrounded by a layer of molten iron. Then they also showed astronauts on the lunar surface.
@UgLyKoerner "Disneyland help build NASA"??? What are You talking about? Do You know anything about NASA and it's history? The "National Advisory Commitee for Aeronautics" (NACA) was set up in 1915, to promote and develop aircraft technology. In 1958, with the beginning space age, the name was changed to "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" (NASA). The organisation is still very much responsible for the development of aircraft technology. Plus space researche.
@YDDES I clearly am not as educated as you on the subject...I have a insane outlook and grasp on this, most deffinietly uniteligable lol...I am completely baffled with the hole thing. However I have watched many videos and read many articles, where Disney got involved with Nasa, had them move there launch pad so it can be filmed with a better scenery...This aint that far fetched...I still do not seee majour evidence.
@UgLyKoerner Can You please point me to some articles (preferable not by the Hoax-sellers), where it is stated that Disney had NASA moving their launchpads? Because I've never heard anything about it, and yet I'm old enough to have followed the spaceprogrammes in detail since the first satellites. Nowhere in all the newspaper clips, scientifical magazines or books I still have, has this been mentioned.
I agree if you were never there how can U really and truly know. The problem goes deep, there were not just people trying to point out the hoax, I have seen endless video's where people are being serious and pointing out the issues...But guess what I do not see??? I mean take a wild guess, I mean this aint rocket science*No pun intended* I don't see one goddamn video proving me shit that they were on the moon, I just see these shitty videos with dark backgrounds and kicking around a dark sand.
@jskate36 Moon hoax believers are like a religion, or a cult, it isn't based in any scientific fact, it's a faith, based only on their beliefs. If you show them evidence that they're wrong, it's like trying to show a religious fanatic that something is wrong. Not that I'm saying religion is wrong at all, I'm just saying that it's a belief that isn't usually associated with scientific fact. Moon hoax is nothing short of a religion, we can only imagine what motivates them psychologically.
@aerowenn and the moon landing believers are also a cult. u guys also think in the ways of religious dogma. your theories only make sense in your own heads, because u WANT to believe. there is no real evidence.
ill tell u what motivates me psychologically.
the fact the the media machine has lied about and twisted all sorts of big events ranging from Pearl Harbour, to Jonestown and Waco. the fact that the world is run by bankers and corporations and not politicians.
@CT2507 Seen way too many movies... The "theories" make sense in our own heads, because they are proven, scientific, used every day, solid, tested, repeatable, fact... that's all there is to it. I know this, because that's my degree. In case you want to say physics is a hoax, I've been in countless labs, and I work in aerospace, trust me, it wasn't a hoax. The media machine, sure, I'll agree it's faulty, but that isn't what happened here. Plus, we give power to those who run things, nomatter who
@aerowenn no no... we are not talking about a "faulty" media machine, but a fucking lying and corrupt one! big difference.
well if u are so educated i feel sorry for u. the waking up process will be that much more painful in your case.
u fail to see that just because your scientific ideas make sense within their own world, it doesn't prove that men really walked on the moon. even most of the NASA employees thought they were working on a genuine project.
in the dark by controlling the key players. the bosses.
we are all brought up by wanting/needing to keep our bosses happy so we keep our heads down and just do what we are told, or else...
the same in your world of science. u depend on keeping some higher heads happy, or your out. NASA is very compartmentalised and suffers from the same thing. between some actual scientific projects within NASA that do work and having actual people walking on the moon, u only need a (cont)
@CT2507 Waking up process? You need to have some experience in physics and engineering to even understand the mechanics behind a process like a lunar landing mission. Please, if we're going to discuss this, give me some specific problems with the lunar landing mission that you feel make way for it to be a hoax. This is something I have a lot of time in. As for my work, the organization I work for is non-profit, edu outreach, a small team, I head my own projects and don't really answer to anyone.
@aerowenn hehehe.... all the time u try and push this conversation into your comfort zone. your mathematics and physics. u like that horse, and that's why u are riding it.
this is in fact exactly what master-conspirators are counting on. that people with an education have an ego to protect, a job they are afraid to loose, a family, a self-image, a reputation that is dear to them!
that's how people are caught in the web and dare not question authority!
@CT2507 It was a scientific mission, dependent on hundreds of thousands of engineering hours. There's nothing else, I'm not pushing it into any zone, I'm asking the questions that actually make or break the mission, philosophy is most definitely not part of it. My reason, isn't for reputation, I'm as skeptical as the next guy, I have no reason to defend something that faces bogus accusations other than I feel compasion towards people, and I don't want others having "the Earth is flat" mindsets.
@aerowenn sure there were thousands of hours of engineering put into making some vessels that could take man into orbit around the earth. and that's about it. that i believe is possible. but not the moon. i've see plenty of lunar photos where the same backdrops are used and reused for different locations!?! the lunar rover leaving no tracks and so on. if i cant see those im blind... regardless of whatever lofty education i might have.
@CT2507 I've never seen photos without tracks, maybe manipulated photos. Backdrops, unless you're a moon geography expert, it's pretty hard to tell one rock or hill from another. As far as the radiation belts, our magnetosphere protects us from a lot of things, ionized particles and range of harmful radiation, but nothing we haven't already overcame with HEO spacecraft and interplanetary missions like Mars rovers or deep space probes, shielding for a manned craft, is done in the same way.
Dude I totally agree with you it was all fake if they drove through the Van Halen Belt they'd all a got supar powers like teh Fantastic Four but Buzz Armstrong don't even have Xray vision so that prooves it to me an my hoax friends. Tomorrow we're gonna build a fort.
@TheJomogogo Firstly: It's not "Van Halen Belt" it's "van Allen belts". Secondly: It's not lethal or dangerous in any way to just pass through the belts in a few hours inside a spaceship. Try to educate Yourself a little bit, instead of believing everyting the Hoax-sellers tell You...
@CT2507 Well, I was old enough to read everything about both the American and Soviet Space programmes I could find in those days, and I know the technology to go to the Moon and back was at hand. What could be so hard? Tell me why it's impossible, please!
@YDDES how do u know?. i mean realy know. u werent working for NASA or on the moon yourself were u?
i cant tell u why its impossible. im not a scientist, and need not be. i just look at all the material and say. it must have been impossible, why otherwise the need to fake it.
@CT2507 Well, they didn't fake it. No one has ever presented any "evidence" for that, that hasn't been refuted.
I know it was possible, because I read, in depth, about how the equipment was built and functioned. I have worked in high technological companies ever since, and consider myself very capable to determine what's possible to do with todays technology.
For the time beeing, it's just funding that stops us going back to the Moon.
But, You are free to believe the hoax-sellers if You want!
@YDDES the funding excuse is bullshit. when all the machinery has been developed and is in place, its basically just the fuel and man hours that cost money. those few bucks could easily be made through advertising.
just as the "there is no need to go to the moon cause its just a sandy rocky place - nothing to see there. so we don't go there", is also bullshit!
it could become the greatest tourist attraction ever!!!
there are many many MANY wealthy people who would pay lots of money to go there!
@CT2507 You don't know what You're talking about. "Only fuel"? Do You know how much a Saturn V and an Apollo ship costs? And they can only be used once. Tourists? With Apollo technology? One tourist on each trip. How many tourists can afford to buy a Saturn V, an Apollo Spaceship including a LEM, all the fuel, and pay the astronaut "taxi drivers, all the personnell necessary to get the rocket ready, launch it, and retrive the capsule at sea?
@CT2507 Furthermore: "All machinery is in place". What machinery? The launch pads? They have been rebuilt for the Shuttles. They would have to be rebuilt again. The factories building the rockets and spaceships have long gone scrapped all the jigs and tools, since they couldn't afford to let them occupie place when they moved on with other projects.
Actually: It would be as least as expensive to revive the 40 year old technology of Apollo, as to develop a new, more modern system.
@YDDES thats the lie u want to believe. as i said. moon trips could have been turned into the biggest tourist attraction on the planet!!! it could have paid itself a 1000 times over easy. no need for it to be scrapped or be deemed a hole in the budget. it could have been turned into a big profit.
NASA could charge what ever they wanted for a ticket to the moon and u'd have all the wealthy people who would stand in line and be happy to pay! be happy to experience space!
@CT2507 Prove it! What's so hard? We can build a space station. That's harder than just proceed to the Moon. It's even harder to fake all the evidence that we have been there.
@YDDES couldn't tell u. could be the van allen belt, could be that the technology simply wasn't ready yet. but they faked it al right. faking the evidence isn't hard. filming some guys jumping around supported by wires in a desert somewhere is real simple. controlling some key bosses at nasa is simple.
@CT2507 OK. I see... A desert with no wind to stir up the dust or move the flag, and just one single light, bright as the sun, tens of thousand feet up in the air to light up the whole landscape... Makes sense, just as some "key bosses" could decive all rocket scientists, mission controllers, radio astronomers and other scientists around the world. What an intelligent theory!
@YDDES u obviously know nothing about how movies are made. thats your problem. go educate yourself.
and yes, a handful of key bosses who control nasa is enough. we are very authority driven and believe whatever is told to us from above, within the structure of career making. goes for all jobs, or haven't u noticed.
@CT2507 Well, personally I don't believe everything I'm told. I've gathered information of the spaceprogrammes (both American, Sovietish/Russian and European), from many different sources since those days.
Actyuall y, I know A LOT abot how movies are made. Special effects in films happen to be one of my hobbies. For example: If Ihad the time and room, I could describe how every effect in "2001" and "Star Wars" were done. Continuing...
@CT2507 I have, for example, many years of the monthly magazine "Starlog", where every special effect in most SF films are described in detail. So, I would be glad if You could tell me how they filmed the astronauts in this VAST lunar landscape here on Earth, and what kind of effects they used.
well then, if u are so adept at movie making and special effects how about we turn the roles around a bit and it becomes your home assignment to figure out how the illusion of a lunar movie could be manufactured. im sure if u really had to, u could think of something... ;)
remember people only see what is within the frame, the rest is up to their imagination. that should help u a bit.
sure, u can use backdrops of hills to create illusion of distance and so on...
@CT2507 Ha-ha! Backdrops? When they filmed the landscape from the moving rovers? And also swept the camera nearly 360 degrees around?
Also: Have You ever seen a movie where there is a black sky and all objects on the ground cast only one, sharp shadow, all in the same direction, on a set of tens of thousands square feet?
What wires would You need so they are invisible, against both the very light ground and the black sky?
I can tell You that with the 60's technology it couldn't be done (prove me wrong). In no movie set on the Moon, there were scenes with actors on the ground, the horizon visible, and the camera moving more than a few feet (mostly it didn't move at all).
If there had been an atmosphere, the dust would have billowed in clouds behind the speeding Rovers, but it settled in perfaect ballistic trajectories. Evidence for a vacuum.
@CT2507 For some reason, Your last replay didn't turn up here, but it's clear that it's YOU who are the idiot. "Tourists to the Moon with Apollo technology". You clearly don't have the slightest idea what a moonrocket is, how much it costs to build one, and how many people are involved for every launch. There would of course not be people standing in a line to pay billions for a round trip to the Moon. If it's so easy, why don't they just build their own rocket? You ARE an idiot....
bunch of people who are corrupt and willing to change the course of things, and then u get a totally different outcome.
now, u say u are well educated and experienced in physics. well, i am educated and experienced in sports, yoga and martial arts. spent most of my life on what our body can and cannot do. my eye is very keen and my sensing apparatus works well above average, and when i look at these poor fakers jumping across the lunar surface i see people who cant move (cont)
@CT2507 freely. who are hindered by what can only be wires! sometimes they are helped and sometimes they are impeded by these same wires, cause often their inner point of balance is not where it should be and they need to make quick adjustments to not topple over.
normally our point of balance is just below the navel. the middle of our body, and we move in a special way cause of it. but with the astronauts that point of balance is constantly being messed with by something
@UgLyKoerner You really think so? Do You also think that it's hilariuos that they can't launch a squadron of B-25's from the carrier "Hornet" against Japan today? Because it's just exactly the same thing. The equipment don't exist any more. No one will pay for a "Hornet" replica and new B-25 bombers, just as no one will pay for new Saturn V boosters or Apollo spaceships.
@YDDES Yeah that suck's...I mean to me it seem's so important to get more space operation's. We are a slow human race. But your right who want's to pay for it...To bad NASA should market themselves more and get the money. I know a million kids world wide would buy that shit.
@UgLyKoerner Well, to go to the Moon again may not be the most important thing NASA can do. First they should get a new a better system to go to Earth orbits again.
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven to me that hoaxers arguments consist of personal insults first, actual observations second. why attempt to debate with someone if you can just make fun of them, right?. why not use the old "the flag is waving" argument. I haven't seen that one in awhile.
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven to me that hoaxers arguments consist of personal insults first, actual observations second. why attempt to debate with someone if you can just make fun of them, right?. why not use the old "the flag is waving" argument. I haven't seen that one in awhile.
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven to me that hoaxers arguments consist of personal insults first, actual observations second. why attempt to debate with someone if you can just make fun of them, right?. why not use the old "the flag is waving" argument. I haven't seen that one in awhile.
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven to me that hoaxers arguments consist of personal insults first, actual observations second. why attempt to debate with someone if you can just make fun of them, right?. why not use the old "the flag is waving" argument. I haven't seen that one in awhile.
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven to me that hoaxers arguments consist of personal insults first, actual observations second. why attempt to debate with someone if you can just make fun of them, right?. why not use the old "the flag is waving" argument. I haven't seen that one in awhile.
@2nasafakedit your comparison of NASA to the Nazi regime shows not only your complete lack of understanding of science, but also your lack of understanding of history and government. Go get an education kid (I certainly hope you're a kid) and then come back and try to formulate some arguments
@2nasafakedit all i've gotten from talking with you is being called a "full time moron" and a "propaganda pimp" you have proven to me that hoaxers do nothing but spew random speculation, outlandish claims, and personal insults to try and prove their points. It has been an incredible waste of time trying to discuss anything with you based on actual evidence. As far as i'm concerned you are delusional and paranoid.
Amazing how many idiots still believe a man was actually up there. I guess your govt really has your best interest at heart, huh? Then why are things so fucked up? They “hate” war yet we're constantly at war and hey “hate” deficits yet our deficits grows like my cock.
Why the fuck haven't we went back to the moon since then. Seems our govt can't waste enough of our tax dollars fast enough so why not show us what the moon looks like on an HD TV? Because they've NEVER been; that's why!
@ObamaTheRealLoser so you're complaining about the deficit, and the war on a video clip of an astronaut falling on the moon? you must be a very angry person.
ps the moon footage wasn't in HD because this happened in the 70s, hotshot
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven to me that hoaxers arguments consist of personal insults first, actual observations second. why attempt to debate with someone if you can just make fun of them, right?. why not use the old "the flag is waving" argument. I haven't seen that one in awhile.
@2nasafakedit do you have an actual argument or are you just trying to personally insult me? Seriously, I'd love to debunk your claims, but if you're just gonna type insults away at your keyboard I really don't have anything to say to you
@2nasafakedit do you even know what "cosmic radiation is?" I don't think it's as deadly as you perceive it to be. there are no obvious short term effects of being exposed to cosmic radiation, and the long term effects of exposure are unknown, but appear to be fairly benign. You can't just assume something you dont' understand is dangerous. Cosmic radiation is measured in Sieverts. The estimated "danger zone" for humans is 1-4 SV. unshielded astronauts receive 400-900 mSV annually.
@DarkMariowithpaper4 "Why waste billions going back"? Same reason you idiots went to Iraq and Afghanistan looking for ghost, killing millions and wasting trillions in the process.
Makes more sense to show us what the moon looks like on my 52" HD then the latest 19 year redneck killed in action on CNN, no?
Bullcrap, We went to the Moon in the 60's but cannot now, and all the footage is bullcrap, slowed down, wire magic. They are not Heros but con artist.
@junglemike72 have you got any stupid professor from your stupid scool that can help you in analyzing the moon vids? you can't slow down the object that they throw away (see other vid clips). have you ever noticed the little power they use in their arms and even so ..the objects fly away fast e and far away. MESURE THEM.
@junglemike72 The reason we can't go to the moon now is not because we faked the moon landing and never had the technology, we have the technology, sir, even in the fifties we had full out conceptual blue-prints for an Interstellar rocket (was to travel to the star(s) alpha-centauri). We could make amazing machines because we as a species hold the key of mathematics, and we could, and did, go the the moon in the sixties. The reason we haven't returned is because of one word: MONEY!!!!!!
why does moon dirt stick to the space suit when its as dry as sand roasting on a hot beach? that space man looks like a littel boy who went out to play in the mud. he is covered with dirt. i realize tracking all that dirt into a spaceship might dirty up theplace place but think of all the switches and filters that could get clogged ,
@datzfast, lunar regolith is formed from the impact of meteoroids, which heats up the rock & the freezes it instantly into jagged, crusty particles--not smooth like beach sand which has experienced erosion.There's no wind or rain to cause erosion on the moon. In addition, lack of air on the moon causes an extremely high level of electrostatic energy. Regolith is opposite charged compared to a nylon spacesuit. Dirt & dust is ALWAY a concern in ALL spaceflight, so systems are designed accordingly.
@datzfast ...um...did I say anything about temperatures? You may want to research what you casually call "duct tape." Do some reading about Dupont's polyimide tape--otherwise known as Kapton, which is used on almost all spacecraft, including those operated in deep space.
@LunarTuner bla , bla , bla Kapton the gold colored foil used as a heat insulator or refector, now lets talk about the mystical glue that makes it into a sticky tape. or as you probably perfer lunar bonding strip. whats that? up to the challenge?
@datzfast Kapton tape has many forms and is use in all kinds of industrial environments with temperatures up to 500 F. There are copper conductive versions, aluminized versions, water-soluble polyester versions. Are you suggesting the tape adhesive doesn't work? Would you like to tell that to Dupont? How does it seal the various points on the satellite feeding your phone calls and TV shows? The silicon adhesives can handle the same temperature ranges (from about -100 to 500 F). No problem.
@LunarTuner yes its called tape because its flat and yo use it to connect circut boards but , no glue. open you computer , camera, cell pone the all use the tape connector but, no glue.
@datzfast, If I recall, your original objection was that "duct tape" used on the Apollo missions (for example, to repair the rover fender during Apollo 17) would have frozen. My point to you is that it is not the duct tape one might purchase at Home Depot, but it uses Kapton silicon adhesive manufactured by Dupont exactly for extreme conditions. On the Apollo 17 rover fender, the temperatures are more likely to be quite hot, since it's rarely in shade. Not a problem for this silicon adhesive.
@datzfast, I don't know what patent you're looking at, but Kapton tape was used extensively during the Apollo program. Photos of the LM with Kapton dangling everywhere can be seen. You can even buy Apollo-flown Kapton tape and shielding on eBay as souvenirs! 3M and Dupont surely believe they had and used silicon adhesive Kapton tape for Apollo...but maybe you know better.
@askjiir i really don't know except that he supposedly had a very uncouth personality - sort of a bigmouth who would unintentionally say rude things. Astronauts Ron Evans (Apollo17) and Jim Irwin (Apollo 15) and others didn't particularly like Jack very much. but i always liked him
He sure seems like a big mouth with a irritating and nonchalant attitude, even when he is on the damn moon ! Maybe I can understand where some of the dislike might come from. : /
@askjiir hi! you got it! you hit the nail on the head. in Gene Cernan's book 'Last Man on the Moon', Gene said that it was strange that Jack didn't care about looking back at the Earth and seeing the beauty of it. Gene said something like 'wow, look at the earth, Jack, how beautiful', and Jack replied "You seen one earth, you've seen em all." Gene then talked about how he thought that was pretty shallow or something like that - the fact that Jack was so blase' about the earth-view
@askjiir well sometimes in interviews he seems kind of cool. he doesn't appear so pretentious. he was surprised and disappointed to hear that Dave Scott (Apollo 15) had separated from his wife, so he can be polite. when he gives speeches, he's OK. but yeah, everybody it seems, had 'a problem' with Jack's personality. i guess he was a smug person or something. oh well, maybe he's mellowed a little after all these years
yea he knew that the moon is just a giant alien base so they landed superquick then got off cause they were afraid the aliens were going to come out there giant moon base and say get off my porch you white trash, then they flew back and said now we have a bullshit story to keep the masses blind for a cople more decades thats why neil armstrong is a muslim now
JFK speech secret societies, watch, malcom x speeches, They speak real truth about reality. This moon stuff is petty. I say all this to these people, but I'm not claiming I know whats going on, It's just wierd times. Their has been over 6 earth quakes this year, a volcano in iceland, pb oil spill, gaza isreal thing, european union falling, bankok revolution, drug wars in south america, and of course, crazy crop circles with no claims, and the ones claimed to be made, never have evidence.
Your comment shows how fucking retarded you really are. Thrust... He's jumping; there's the thrust you dumbass. He jumps up and falls back down due to gravity just like on earth and any other cosmic body with enough mass. Air has absolutely nothing to do with it.
our planet would be hollow if it wasnt for the center being filled with magma, since the moon has none that could be a possiblity. im no geography expert but it makes sense to me lol
Thats what im talking about two different intercoms.The public what! is this NASCAR!You ten drivers crash everone that gets in the way!Clean up the comments what is this?let people say what they beleive! if you beleive fine if you think youve been played ok!Filter?you mean rig it. cables and studio!
This has been flagged as spam show
Em 1997, uma garota chamada Lauren estava caminhando em uma floresta, e de repente desapareceu, ninguém nunca encontrou-a até 2000, quando uma outra menina chamada Maria encontrou o corpo e marcas em seu peito, disseram: Não era bonita o suficiente "e, agora, você leu isso, ela aparecerá em seu espelho dizendo que você não é bonito o suficiente e matá-lo! (pela forma como o menina chamada Mary morreu pouco depois) Para se salvar colar este para 5 outros videos
denilsonmon20112012 2 months ago
good ol jack,he went to taurus littro and returned a super geologist
guitarnashelter 2 months ago
He's being filmed from below and he's on a massive hill. The surface topography is faint because it's all white, but you can see the angles of the terrain. On that terrain the movement looks normal. Anyone can recreate that kind of footage on a steep hill, if you then remove all references, like background and sky, then the movement can to some look odd, as in this footage. This is a tiny fragment of one of the many movies that prove man walked on the moon.
RussellHorwood 3 months ago
XD i like how he is like ohhh! when he drops it XD
Gladosisdahbest 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I wish the comments on moon videos were more varied in content.
askjiir 3 months ago
Comment removed
askjiir 3 months ago
So, Jack Schmitt died on the moon because he couldn't get up, so the Apollo 18 movie will be about his zombie.
3ISAMAGICNUMBR 4 months ago
The bag is magically :moving along the astronaut.
hunchbacked 5 months ago
sloooooooooo mooooo
trewq333 6 months ago
wow they're on the moon...i dont think i can get that high...uh uh..i meant by flying of course..
TheBsheep 6 months ago
WE WENT TO THE MOON ALL THOSE WHO SAID THAT WE DONT GO IS BECAUSE THEY CANT GO.}
THEN IF THEY SAY THAT THIS IS FAKED THEN WHY THEY SEE IT
TheBetito123 7 months ago 6
@TheBetito123 exxcactly!
nitroxide2011 5 months ago
DRUNK ON THE MOON FTW!!!!!
PivotSweden 8 months ago
hahha "dag gummit!"
Laughingsoohardd 8 months ago
This is about as clear evidence as it gets that he's not wearing a wire.
jetfreak4 8 months ago
does he say "nooooo damn germans"?
amor987654321 9 months ago
@amor987654321 dagumet (how ever you spell it)
qwertyboyo 9 months ago
That totally looks like they were using wires there.
MoneyIsSilver 9 months ago
I want to be the first person to fall on Mars!
junkers1337 10 months ago
HA HA, tool!
nuggz503 10 months ago
aeiou
aderingflerger 10 months ago
These astronauts are so awesome! "da-gummit!" I love them!
decemberdazzle 10 months ago
If it was a hoax, hundreds of thousands of people involved in the Apollo missions would have to keep it a secret. Even with all of America's civil servants and bureaucrats the paper work would be impossible!
ZombieTom 11 months ago
@ZombieTom haha, why EXACTLY would it take hundreds of thousands to film a couple movies in a small hangar???????? This argument gets used SOOO much by you stupid propagandists.
yesiamawizardjonny 10 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny HERP DERP
4Locke4 10 months ago
why are you guys all arguing, this video is just hilarious x)
REpsycho 11 months ago
Hey, what's with the flaming? I just commented on what I see and hear. I have not drawn any conclusions, just made an observation. Please read my comment before making yours.
@ 1992photographer. I do not see the box hit his leg.
@YDDES how come you don't hear the hammer land in this famous staged and rehearsed footage reinacting Galleleos experiment?
youtube dot com/watch?v=4mTsrRZEMwA&feature=related
videoneptune 11 months ago
the box hit his leg. Why are you guys over-analyzing everything? Appreciate what YOUR TAX DOLLARS help mankind to achieve. Stop being little pussies. And how the hell are you guys talking about Disney? Holy Shit. STFU.
1992photographer 11 months ago
why are these clowns moving in slowmotion?
CT2507 11 months ago
@CT2507
Low gravity.
askjiir 3 months ago
@askjiir realy... u believe that!?
CT2507 3 months ago
Comment removed
askjiir 3 months ago
@askjiir haha... realy?!
well why dont u suckle on my ziple then, cause i know no better!
cheers .. :))
CT2507 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CT2507
It's spelled "really." And write "you" not "u." You are clearly not the type interested in any discussion on this topic. I can smell self important, stuck up know it all's from a miles distance.
askjiir 3 months ago
dadgummit!
lazer1million 11 months ago
I am a bit surprised that you can hear the box land....in a vacuum!! WTF
videoneptune 1 year ago
@videoneptune If that sound relly IS from the landing box (not proven) it's not so surprising, since soundwaves travel through any matter. Here: The ground, the astronauts foot and up to the mike in his helmet.
YDDES 1 year ago
@videoneptune yeah it's incredible. You'd think NASA scientists would realize this obvious flaw and edit out the sound. I guess you've outsmarted the NASA scientists... incredible. You should publish a research paper or something.
Tewks44 1 year ago
@videoneptune
Wow...good catch, you can hear the box land at the very beginning. That's something I can't explain, can anyone else?
TheJomogogo 11 months ago
@TheJomogogo The sound of the box traveled up his suit. There is no microphones on the camera's filming them.
tippmannperson 11 months ago
@tippmannperson
Ahhh...yeah that makes sense, thanks.
TheJomogogo 11 months ago
@videoneptune hit his leg. watch the video. Use the gray matter you were born with to filter what you type-before you type it
1992photographer 11 months ago
@videoneptune
I believe this is caused by the Air INSIDE his suit. The microphone was mounted inside the astronauts suit, so when the box hit the suit the sound was transferred via the air molecules in the astronauts suit.
boomtastic67 9 months ago
@boomtastic67 Thank you for a plausible answer.
videoneptune 9 months ago
@videoneptune
No problem
boomtastic67 9 months ago
The conspiracy theorist clearly know what it's like wearing a spacesuit on the moon. Therefore, they must be right. Give it up. Humans have been to the moon.
zoltar5282 1 year ago
Another thing I love America, but America is the land of make believe...Nobody sales the world better then America through the vice of a TV...We all grew up believing Charles Manson was this brutal murder, rather he was just some bum with a mouth, who never did the killing yet he gets all the glory, why? cause he fit the part the best. Disneyland help build NASA. TV is one fucked up thing, People believe it way to much...
UgLyKoerner 1 year ago
@UgLyKoerner Whatever USA is and does, the lunar landings can't have been faked. It's not just about photos and films impossible to fake in the 60's. It's also about the tracking of the spaceships by many independent sources, the thousands of involved people and the recent photos by lunar satellites.
I trust the scientist more than I trust those selling hoax-books and videos to the ignorants.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES I guess it just blows me away that we don't see this on TV ever...although I am guessing it's cause the poor video quality...Just even bad quality or not, I never see anything on dicovery chennel about it...To me this should be a yearly show. Maybe I need to look harder. Like I said it does seem weird to fake somthing and fake it like 6 times...But I just aint sold on this old footage. I also trust those who are scientist No one mentions moon landing s at all on any of the science shows.
UgLyKoerner 1 year ago
@UgLyKoerner Then You must look at the wrong shows, or at the wrong times. I have seen a lot about the lunar landings and other space projects through the years.
Just yesterday they mentioned on TV, that by analyzing, with modern methods, the information gathered by the seismological instruments placed by the astronauts, scientists have determined than the Moon has a dense iron core, surrounded by a layer of molten iron. Then they also showed astronauts on the lunar surface.
YDDES 1 year ago
@UgLyKoerner "Disneyland help build NASA"??? What are You talking about? Do You know anything about NASA and it's history? The "National Advisory Commitee for Aeronautics" (NACA) was set up in 1915, to promote and develop aircraft technology. In 1958, with the beginning space age, the name was changed to "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" (NASA). The organisation is still very much responsible for the development of aircraft technology. Plus space researche.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES I clearly am not as educated as you on the subject...I have a insane outlook and grasp on this, most deffinietly uniteligable lol...I am completely baffled with the hole thing. However I have watched many videos and read many articles, where Disney got involved with Nasa, had them move there launch pad so it can be filmed with a better scenery...This aint that far fetched...I still do not seee majour evidence.
UgLyKoerner 1 year ago
@UgLyKoerner Can You please point me to some articles (preferable not by the Hoax-sellers), where it is stated that Disney had NASA moving their launchpads? Because I've never heard anything about it, and yet I'm old enough to have followed the spaceprogrammes in detail since the first satellites. Nowhere in all the newspaper clips, scientifical magazines or books I still have, has this been mentioned.
YDDES 1 year ago
I agree if you were never there how can U really and truly know. The problem goes deep, there were not just people trying to point out the hoax, I have seen endless video's where people are being serious and pointing out the issues...But guess what I do not see??? I mean take a wild guess, I mean this aint rocket science*No pun intended* I don't see one goddamn video proving me shit that they were on the moon, I just see these shitty videos with dark backgrounds and kicking around a dark sand.
UgLyKoerner 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The box falls at earth speed . Now take your fake video and shove it up your ass.
realdrummer110 1 year ago
@jskate36 Moon hoax believers are like a religion, or a cult, it isn't based in any scientific fact, it's a faith, based only on their beliefs. If you show them evidence that they're wrong, it's like trying to show a religious fanatic that something is wrong. Not that I'm saying religion is wrong at all, I'm just saying that it's a belief that isn't usually associated with scientific fact. Moon hoax is nothing short of a religion, we can only imagine what motivates them psychologically.
aerowenn 1 year ago
@aerowenn and the moon landing believers are also a cult. u guys also think in the ways of religious dogma. your theories only make sense in your own heads, because u WANT to believe. there is no real evidence.
ill tell u what motivates me psychologically.
the fact the the media machine has lied about and twisted all sorts of big events ranging from Pearl Harbour, to Jonestown and Waco. the fact that the world is run by bankers and corporations and not politicians.
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 Seen way too many movies... The "theories" make sense in our own heads, because they are proven, scientific, used every day, solid, tested, repeatable, fact... that's all there is to it. I know this, because that's my degree. In case you want to say physics is a hoax, I've been in countless labs, and I work in aerospace, trust me, it wasn't a hoax. The media machine, sure, I'll agree it's faulty, but that isn't what happened here. Plus, we give power to those who run things, nomatter who
aerowenn 1 year ago
@aerowenn no no... we are not talking about a "faulty" media machine, but a fucking lying and corrupt one! big difference.
well if u are so educated i feel sorry for u. the waking up process will be that much more painful in your case.
u fail to see that just because your scientific ideas make sense within their own world, it doesn't prove that men really walked on the moon. even most of the NASA employees thought they were working on a genuine project.
and its easy to keep most people (cont)
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 (cont)
in the dark by controlling the key players. the bosses.
we are all brought up by wanting/needing to keep our bosses happy so we keep our heads down and just do what we are told, or else...
the same in your world of science. u depend on keeping some higher heads happy, or your out. NASA is very compartmentalised and suffers from the same thing. between some actual scientific projects within NASA that do work and having actual people walking on the moon, u only need a (cont)
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 Waking up process? You need to have some experience in physics and engineering to even understand the mechanics behind a process like a lunar landing mission. Please, if we're going to discuss this, give me some specific problems with the lunar landing mission that you feel make way for it to be a hoax. This is something I have a lot of time in. As for my work, the organization I work for is non-profit, edu outreach, a small team, I head my own projects and don't really answer to anyone.
aerowenn 1 year ago
@aerowenn hehehe.... all the time u try and push this conversation into your comfort zone. your mathematics and physics. u like that horse, and that's why u are riding it.
this is in fact exactly what master-conspirators are counting on. that people with an education have an ego to protect, a job they are afraid to loose, a family, a self-image, a reputation that is dear to them!
that's how people are caught in the web and dare not question authority!
CT2507 1 year ago
@aerowenn im not gonna to go into a lengthy debate about what i think of the van-alen belt and that kind of stuff. short story is this:
i simply don't believe we had the technology in the 60'ies to bring men to and back from the moon safely! and i don't believe we do today!
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 It was a scientific mission, dependent on hundreds of thousands of engineering hours. There's nothing else, I'm not pushing it into any zone, I'm asking the questions that actually make or break the mission, philosophy is most definitely not part of it. My reason, isn't for reputation, I'm as skeptical as the next guy, I have no reason to defend something that faces bogus accusations other than I feel compasion towards people, and I don't want others having "the Earth is flat" mindsets.
aerowenn 1 year ago
@aerowenn sure there were thousands of hours of engineering put into making some vessels that could take man into orbit around the earth. and that's about it. that i believe is possible. but not the moon. i've see plenty of lunar photos where the same backdrops are used and reused for different locations!?! the lunar rover leaving no tracks and so on. if i cant see those im blind... regardless of whatever lofty education i might have.
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 I've never seen photos without tracks, maybe manipulated photos. Backdrops, unless you're a moon geography expert, it's pretty hard to tell one rock or hill from another. As far as the radiation belts, our magnetosphere protects us from a lot of things, ionized particles and range of harmful radiation, but nothing we haven't already overcame with HEO spacecraft and interplanetary missions like Mars rovers or deep space probes, shielding for a manned craft, is done in the same way.
aerowenn 1 year ago
@CT2507
Dude I totally agree with you it was all fake if they drove through the Van Halen Belt they'd all a got supar powers like teh Fantastic Four but Buzz Armstrong don't even have Xray vision so that prooves it to me an my hoax friends. Tomorrow we're gonna build a fort.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
@TheJomogogo Firstly: It's not "Van Halen Belt" it's "van Allen belts". Secondly: It's not lethal or dangerous in any way to just pass through the belts in a few hours inside a spaceship. Try to educate Yourself a little bit, instead of believing everyting the Hoax-sellers tell You...
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES
Dude.....it was a joke. Thought it was pretty obvious.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
@TheJomogogo Obviously not enough obvious...
YDDES 1 year ago
@CT2507 Well, I was old enough to read everything about both the American and Soviet Space programmes I could find in those days, and I know the technology to go to the Moon and back was at hand. What could be so hard? Tell me why it's impossible, please!
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES how do u know?. i mean realy know. u werent working for NASA or on the moon yourself were u?
i cant tell u why its impossible. im not a scientist, and need not be. i just look at all the material and say. it must have been impossible, why otherwise the need to fake it.
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 Well, they didn't fake it. No one has ever presented any "evidence" for that, that hasn't been refuted.
I know it was possible, because I read, in depth, about how the equipment was built and functioned. I have worked in high technological companies ever since, and consider myself very capable to determine what's possible to do with todays technology.
For the time beeing, it's just funding that stops us going back to the Moon.
But, You are free to believe the hoax-sellers if You want!
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES the funding excuse is bullshit. when all the machinery has been developed and is in place, its basically just the fuel and man hours that cost money. those few bucks could easily be made through advertising.
just as the "there is no need to go to the moon cause its just a sandy rocky place - nothing to see there. so we don't go there", is also bullshit!
it could become the greatest tourist attraction ever!!!
there are many many MANY wealthy people who would pay lots of money to go there!
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 You don't know what You're talking about. "Only fuel"? Do You know how much a Saturn V and an Apollo ship costs? And they can only be used once. Tourists? With Apollo technology? One tourist on each trip. How many tourists can afford to buy a Saturn V, an Apollo Spaceship including a LEM, all the fuel, and pay the astronaut "taxi drivers, all the personnell necessary to get the rocket ready, launch it, and retrive the capsule at sea?
YDDES 1 year ago
@CT2507 Furthermore: "All machinery is in place". What machinery? The launch pads? They have been rebuilt for the Shuttles. They would have to be rebuilt again. The factories building the rockets and spaceships have long gone scrapped all the jigs and tools, since they couldn't afford to let them occupie place when they moved on with other projects.
Actually: It would be as least as expensive to revive the 40 year old technology of Apollo, as to develop a new, more modern system.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES thats the lie u want to believe. as i said. moon trips could have been turned into the biggest tourist attraction on the planet!!! it could have paid itself a 1000 times over easy. no need for it to be scrapped or be deemed a hole in the budget. it could have been turned into a big profit.
NASA could charge what ever they wanted for a ticket to the moon and u'd have all the wealthy people who would stand in line and be happy to pay! be happy to experience space!
u're and idiot.
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 NOW it turned up, so every one with knowledge about the subject can see just how stupid Your statement is!
YDDES 1 year ago
@CT2507 If Moon-tourism gives 1000 times over in profit, why don't you borrow some money and start the business? What's stopping You?
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES haven't u understood a word i said!? we cant go to the moon. we don't have the technology... and never did.
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 Prove it! What's so hard? We can build a space station. That's harder than just proceed to the Moon. It's even harder to fake all the evidence that we have been there.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES couldn't tell u. could be the van allen belt, could be that the technology simply wasn't ready yet. but they faked it al right. faking the evidence isn't hard. filming some guys jumping around supported by wires in a desert somewhere is real simple. controlling some key bosses at nasa is simple.
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 OK. I see... A desert with no wind to stir up the dust or move the flag, and just one single light, bright as the sun, tens of thousand feet up in the air to light up the whole landscape... Makes sense, just as some "key bosses" could decive all rocket scientists, mission controllers, radio astronomers and other scientists around the world. What an intelligent theory!
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES u obviously know nothing about how movies are made. thats your problem. go educate yourself.
and yes, a handful of key bosses who control nasa is enough. we are very authority driven and believe whatever is told to us from above, within the structure of career making. goes for all jobs, or haven't u noticed.
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 Well, personally I don't believe everything I'm told. I've gathered information of the spaceprogrammes (both American, Sovietish/Russian and European), from many different sources since those days.
Actyuall y, I know A LOT abot how movies are made. Special effects in films happen to be one of my hobbies. For example: If Ihad the time and room, I could describe how every effect in "2001" and "Star Wars" were done. Continuing...
YDDES 1 year ago
@CT2507 I have, for example, many years of the monthly magazine "Starlog", where every special effect in most SF films are described in detail. So, I would be glad if You could tell me how they filmed the astronauts in this VAST lunar landscape here on Earth, and what kind of effects they used.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES VAST!?...lol. hardly!
well then, if u are so adept at movie making and special effects how about we turn the roles around a bit and it becomes your home assignment to figure out how the illusion of a lunar movie could be manufactured. im sure if u really had to, u could think of something... ;)
remember people only see what is within the frame, the rest is up to their imagination. that should help u a bit.
sure, u can use backdrops of hills to create illusion of distance and so on...
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 Ha-ha! Backdrops? When they filmed the landscape from the moving rovers? And also swept the camera nearly 360 degrees around?
Also: Have You ever seen a movie where there is a black sky and all objects on the ground cast only one, sharp shadow, all in the same direction, on a set of tens of thousands square feet?
What wires would You need so they are invisible, against both the very light ground and the black sky?
YDDES 1 year ago
@CT2507
I can tell You that with the 60's technology it couldn't be done (prove me wrong). In no movie set on the Moon, there were scenes with actors on the ground, the horizon visible, and the camera moving more than a few feet (mostly it didn't move at all).
If there had been an atmosphere, the dust would have billowed in clouds behind the speeding Rovers, but it settled in perfaect ballistic trajectories. Evidence for a vacuum.
Now, describe how it could be done, please.
YDDES 1 year ago
@CT2507 For some reason, Your last replay didn't turn up here, but it's clear that it's YOU who are the idiot. "Tourists to the Moon with Apollo technology". You clearly don't have the slightest idea what a moonrocket is, how much it costs to build one, and how many people are involved for every launch. There would of course not be people standing in a line to pay billions for a round trip to the Moon. If it's so easy, why don't they just build their own rocket? You ARE an idiot....
YDDES 1 year ago
@CT2507 (cont)
bunch of people who are corrupt and willing to change the course of things, and then u get a totally different outcome.
now, u say u are well educated and experienced in physics. well, i am educated and experienced in sports, yoga and martial arts. spent most of my life on what our body can and cannot do. my eye is very keen and my sensing apparatus works well above average, and when i look at these poor fakers jumping across the lunar surface i see people who cant move (cont)
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 freely. who are hindered by what can only be wires! sometimes they are helped and sometimes they are impeded by these same wires, cause often their inner point of balance is not where it should be and they need to make quick adjustments to not topple over.
normally our point of balance is just below the navel. the middle of our body, and we move in a special way cause of it. but with the astronauts that point of balance is constantly being messed with by something
(cont)
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 outside of them! only wires will make a body move like they move. not gravity, not water not anything else.
CT2507 1 year ago
lol
videomakeingmaster12 1 year ago
I think its hilariuos that yeah they supposedly went in the 60's, but straight can not even go up there now.
UgLyKoerner 1 year ago
@UgLyKoerner in 2010 nasa can't go further than 500 miles from earth
Lol pity the moon is 240,000 miles away
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@UgLyKoerner You really think so? Do You also think that it's hilariuos that they can't launch a squadron of B-25's from the carrier "Hornet" against Japan today? Because it's just exactly the same thing. The equipment don't exist any more. No one will pay for a "Hornet" replica and new B-25 bombers, just as no one will pay for new Saturn V boosters or Apollo spaceships.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Yeah that suck's...I mean to me it seem's so important to get more space operation's. We are a slow human race. But your right who want's to pay for it...To bad NASA should market themselves more and get the money. I know a million kids world wide would buy that shit.
UgLyKoerner 1 year ago
@UgLyKoerner Well, to go to the Moon again may not be the most important thing NASA can do. First they should get a new a better system to go to Earth orbits again.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES lol exactly ;)
UgLyKoerner 1 year ago
I hate these people who belive it is a hoax I have researched this and every evidence they put out there has bee proven wrong
DarkMariowithpaper4 1 year ago
@DarkMariowithpaper4 i hate these people who believe the lies of the fake moon landings
and who believe their criminal US government who are busy destroying the US with the bail outs
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven to me that hoaxers arguments consist of personal insults first, actual observations second. why attempt to debate with someone if you can just make fun of them, right?. why not use the old "the flag is waving" argument. I haven't seen that one in awhile.
Tewks44 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven to me that hoaxers arguments consist of personal insults first, actual observations second. why attempt to debate with someone if you can just make fun of them, right?. why not use the old "the flag is waving" argument. I haven't seen that one in awhile.
Tewks44 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven to me that hoaxers arguments consist of personal insults first, actual observations second. why attempt to debate with someone if you can just make fun of them, right?. why not use the old "the flag is waving" argument. I haven't seen that one in awhile.
Tewks44 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven to me that hoaxers arguments consist of personal insults first, actual observations second. why attempt to debate with someone if you can just make fun of them, right?. why not use the old "the flag is waving" argument. I haven't seen that one in awhile.
Tewks44 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven to me that hoaxers arguments consist of personal insults first, actual observations second. why attempt to debate with someone if you can just make fun of them, right?. why not use the old "the flag is waving" argument. I haven't seen that one in awhile.
Tewks44 1 year ago
FAKE IT TO THE MOON
Nasa Nazis can not go to the moon in 2010
never mind 1969 when space technology was a joke
Nasa is a Joke
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit WHO THUMBED UP FOR THIS IDIOT ?
LichKingpro 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LichKingpro the brainwashed human monkey
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit your comparison of NASA to the Nazi regime shows not only your complete lack of understanding of science, but also your lack of understanding of history and government. Go get an education kid (I certainly hope you're a kid) and then come back and try to formulate some arguments
Tewks44 1 year ago
@Tewks44 the full time MORON
Nasa is a NAZI organisation which was led by
Von Braun the Nazi who should have been hanged
for war crimes, being responsible for the death of 50,000 Britains but instead was made a hero by the US NWO Criminal Govt.
His job was to make rockets blast off a few 100 miles
into space and Nasa Faked the Rest.
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit all i've gotten from talking with you is being called a "full time moron" and a "propaganda pimp" you have proven to me that hoaxers do nothing but spew random speculation, outlandish claims, and personal insults to try and prove their points. It has been an incredible waste of time trying to discuss anything with you based on actual evidence. As far as i'm concerned you are delusional and paranoid.
Tewks44 1 year ago 15
@Tewks44 you are too fucking dumb to discuss anything.
There is no evidence of a moon landing except fake TV videos
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Naughty wives alone and try to chat her mworld5.info
uytiuyt1 1 year ago
HE IS FILTHY.
ou2r3vil 1 year ago
Amazing how many idiots still believe a man was actually up there. I guess your govt really has your best interest at heart, huh? Then why are things so fucked up? They “hate” war yet we're constantly at war and hey “hate” deficits yet our deficits grows like my cock.
Why the fuck haven't we went back to the moon since then. Seems our govt can't waste enough of our tax dollars fast enough so why not show us what the moon looks like on an HD TV? Because they've NEVER been; that's why!
ObamaTheRealLoser 1 year ago
@ObamaTheRealLoser so you're complaining about the deficit, and the war on a video clip of an astronaut falling on the moon? you must be a very angry person.
ps the moon footage wasn't in HD because this happened in the 70s, hotshot
Tewks44 1 year ago
@Tewks44 the moon footage was faked idiot
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit interesting argument. I disagree
ps, what is with hoaxers and name calling. Is it a defense mechanism of some sort or are hoaxers generally just mean spirited individuals?
Tewks44 1 year ago
@Tewks44 take your ritalin kid
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven that hoaxers arguments consist mainly of personal insults.
Tewks44 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit once again you have proven to me that hoaxers arguments consist of personal insults first, actual observations second. why attempt to debate with someone if you can just make fun of them, right?. why not use the old "the flag is waving" argument. I haven't seen that one in awhile.
Tewks44 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit do you have an actual argument or are you just trying to personally insult me? Seriously, I'd love to debunk your claims, but if you're just gonna type insults away at your keyboard I really don't have anything to say to you
Tewks44 1 year ago 12
@Tewks44 the propaganda pimp
Do you know that the moon has a very weak magnetic field retard?
So what protected the fake astronauts from the cosmic radiation?
Gold tin foil layers
LOL
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit do you even know what "cosmic radiation is?" I don't think it's as deadly as you perceive it to be. there are no obvious short term effects of being exposed to cosmic radiation, and the long term effects of exposure are unknown, but appear to be fairly benign. You can't just assume something you dont' understand is dangerous. Cosmic radiation is measured in Sieverts. The estimated "danger zone" for humans is 1-4 SV. unshielded astronauts receive 400-900 mSV annually.
Tewks44 1 year ago
@Tewks44 do you know what a magnetic field is fuckhead?
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2nasafakedit ps. it's pretty ballsy to call someone a "retard" if you don't know what you're talking about
Tewks44 1 year ago
@ObamaTheRealLoser why spend billions of dollars to go back to the moon for NO REASON why should we waste our money proving you idiots wrong
DarkMariowithpaper4 1 year ago
@DarkMariowithpaper4 "Why waste billions going back"? Same reason you idiots went to Iraq and Afghanistan looking for ghost, killing millions and wasting trillions in the process.
Makes more sense to show us what the moon looks like on my 52" HD then the latest 19 year redneck killed in action on CNN, no?
ObamaTheRealLoser 1 year ago
@DarkMariowithpaper4 its 100$ Fake
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
Bullcrap, We went to the Moon in the 60's but cannot now, and all the footage is bullcrap, slowed down, wire magic. They are not Heros but con artist.
junglemike72 1 year ago
@junglemike72 have you got any stupid professor from your stupid scool that can help you in analyzing the moon vids? you can't slow down the object that they throw away (see other vid clips). have you ever noticed the little power they use in their arms and even so ..the objects fly away fast e and far away. MESURE THEM.
elevenby2 1 year ago
@junglemike72 The reason we can't go to the moon now is not because we faked the moon landing and never had the technology, we have the technology, sir, even in the fifties we had full out conceptual blue-prints for an Interstellar rocket (was to travel to the star(s) alpha-centauri). We could make amazing machines because we as a species hold the key of mathematics, and we could, and did, go the the moon in the sixties. The reason we haven't returned is because of one word: MONEY!!!!!!
VanKlaunch 1 year ago
@VanKlaunch Are you serious? Sorry but that has to be the dumbest answer you could of gave me.
junglemike72 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Two Thumbs ups for this video.
One for him saying "D'ooooh" when he drops the object.
The other for his name being "Jack Schmit"
l1qu1dm3t4lIV 1 year ago 2
FAKE ????????????????????
harrop09 1 year ago
why does moon dirt stick to the space suit when its as dry as sand roasting on a hot beach? that space man looks like a littel boy who went out to play in the mud. he is covered with dirt. i realize tracking all that dirt into a spaceship might dirty up theplace place but think of all the switches and filters that could get clogged ,
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast, lunar regolith is formed from the impact of meteoroids, which heats up the rock & the freezes it instantly into jagged, crusty particles--not smooth like beach sand which has experienced erosion.There's no wind or rain to cause erosion on the moon. In addition, lack of air on the moon causes an extremely high level of electrostatic energy. Regolith is opposite charged compared to a nylon spacesuit. Dirt & dust is ALWAY a concern in ALL spaceflight, so systems are designed accordingly.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner congadulations you just described conditions that duct tape wont work. frozen instantly. my i quote you? no, of course not.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast ...um...did I say anything about temperatures? You may want to research what you casually call "duct tape." Do some reading about Dupont's polyimide tape--otherwise known as Kapton, which is used on almost all spacecraft, including those operated in deep space.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner well excuse me buzz lightyear. lunar bonding strip.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast, man if you're going to claim that one of the world's greatest human achievements was some silly hustle, you better know your stuff.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner bla , bla , bla Kapton the gold colored foil used as a heat insulator or refector, now lets talk about the mystical glue that makes it into a sticky tape. or as you probably perfer lunar bonding strip. whats that? up to the challenge?
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast Kapton tape has many forms and is use in all kinds of industrial environments with temperatures up to 500 F. There are copper conductive versions, aluminized versions, water-soluble polyester versions. Are you suggesting the tape adhesive doesn't work? Would you like to tell that to Dupont? How does it seal the various points on the satellite feeding your phone calls and TV shows? The silicon adhesives can handle the same temperature ranges (from about -100 to 500 F). No problem.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner yes its called tape because its flat and yo use it to connect circut boards but , no glue. open you computer , camera, cell pone the all use the tape connector but, no glue.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast, If I recall, your original objection was that "duct tape" used on the Apollo missions (for example, to repair the rover fender during Apollo 17) would have frozen. My point to you is that it is not the duct tape one might purchase at Home Depot, but it uses Kapton silicon adhesive manufactured by Dupont exactly for extreme conditions. On the Apollo 17 rover fender, the temperatures are more likely to be quite hot, since it's rarely in shade. Not a problem for this silicon adhesive.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner this is just to easy, the earliest patent is from 1982 so unless they have a time machine at NASA go piss up a rope.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast, I don't know what patent you're looking at, but Kapton tape was used extensively during the Apollo program. Photos of the LM with Kapton dangling everywhere can be seen. You can even buy Apollo-flown Kapton tape and shielding on eBay as souvenirs! 3M and Dupont surely believe they had and used silicon adhesive Kapton tape for Apollo...but maybe you know better.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
That is Harrison Schmidt on Apollo 17 the last manned moon mission December 11 1972
Welshman2008 1 year ago
lol I love this!
*drops box*
"awwww. dammit."
and then the other guy is commenting on it XD
FegeleinsRevenge 1 year ago
The Gravity on the moon is only 17% of earth's gravity. You can notice that, in the slow way the astronaut falls.
askjiir 1 year ago
some of the astronauts didn't like Jack Schmitt. i always thought that was uncool. just let him be. i always thought he was cool. whatever
TracyAndersonFoxhunt 1 year ago
@TracyAndersonFoxhunt
They didn't like him ? Why ?
askjiir 1 year ago
@askjiir i really don't know except that he supposedly had a very uncouth personality - sort of a bigmouth who would unintentionally say rude things. Astronauts Ron Evans (Apollo17) and Jim Irwin (Apollo 15) and others didn't particularly like Jack very much. but i always liked him
TracyAndersonFoxhunt 1 year ago
@TracyAndersonFoxhunt
He sure seems like a big mouth with a irritating and nonchalant attitude, even when he is on the damn moon ! Maybe I can understand where some of the dislike might come from. : /
askjiir 1 year ago
@askjiir hi! you got it! you hit the nail on the head. in Gene Cernan's book 'Last Man on the Moon', Gene said that it was strange that Jack didn't care about looking back at the Earth and seeing the beauty of it. Gene said something like 'wow, look at the earth, Jack, how beautiful', and Jack replied "You seen one earth, you've seen em all." Gene then talked about how he thought that was pretty shallow or something like that - the fact that Jack was so blase' about the earth-view
TracyAndersonFoxhunt 1 year ago
@TracyAndersonFoxhunt
I knew that boy was shitty shit ! So why like him ? : p
askjiir 1 year ago
@askjiir well sometimes in interviews he seems kind of cool. he doesn't appear so pretentious. he was surprised and disappointed to hear that Dave Scott (Apollo 15) had separated from his wife, so he can be polite. when he gives speeches, he's OK. but yeah, everybody it seems, had 'a problem' with Jack's personality. i guess he was a smug person or something. oh well, maybe he's mellowed a little after all these years
TracyAndersonFoxhunt 1 year ago
@TracyAndersonFoxhunt
Hm. Interesting. I better look closer into that. Thanks for the info !
askjiir 1 year ago
oops dropped my groceries
killduber 1 year ago
@killduber lol.. he dropped his Tang!!
TracyAndersonFoxhunt 1 year ago
yea he knew that the moon is just a giant alien base so they landed superquick then got off cause they were afraid the aliens were going to come out there giant moon base and say get off my porch you white trash, then they flew back and said now we have a bullshit story to keep the masses blind for a cople more decades thats why neil armstrong is a muslim now
monkeyjoe9 1 year ago
right, this doesnt look like wires were helping him up at all
Mrquestionreality 1 year ago
LMAO!
BalcoZero 1 year ago
Hahaha in da face
campbanana726 1 year ago
JFK speech secret societies, watch, malcom x speeches, They speak real truth about reality. This moon stuff is petty. I say all this to these people, but I'm not claiming I know whats going on, It's just wierd times. Their has been over 6 earth quakes this year, a volcano in iceland, pb oil spill, gaza isreal thing, european union falling, bankok revolution, drug wars in south america, and of course, crazy crop circles with no claims, and the ones claimed to be made, never have evidence.
monkeyjoe9 1 year ago
lool somehow that looked cute. like a big baby which cant get up anymore ^^
chri8686 1 year ago
haha do we, right at the beginning, hear his bag falling????????????
losability 1 year ago
Your comment shows how fucking retarded you really are. Thrust... He's jumping; there's the thrust you dumbass. He jumps up and falls back down due to gravity just like on earth and any other cosmic body with enough mass. Air has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Venim0 1 year ago
our planet would be hollow if it wasnt for the center being filled with magma, since the moon has none that could be a possiblity. im no geography expert but it makes sense to me lol
XXRevolveXX 1 year ago
Thats what im talking about two different intercoms.The public what! is this NASCAR!You ten drivers crash everone that gets in the way!Clean up the comments what is this?let people say what they beleive! if you beleive fine if you think youve been played ok!Filter?you mean rig it. cables and studio!
stephenrhaylock