Added: 3 years ago
From: TheLDNCMG
Views: 55,549
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (218)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This was not written by Gustavo

  • This was not written by Colin Mather

  • I should also mention that the above subtitle is wrong it should be Pluto - The Renewer

  • My high school band done the planets my eighth grade year, it was awesome, but no pluto was not written by Holst, it was written by Colin Matthews, in memory of Holst's late daughter.

  • No shit! Holst didn't write this... Pluto wasn't even discovered during his life... so.. I think Mathews piece... should possibly be included in future performances of THE PLANETS... just a thought... good ideas,,, sorry, can't stand the recording, but the piece is great!!

  • @gwhubert Pluto was discovered four years before holst died. He just didn't want to write another movement

  • Gustav Holst didn't write this...it was Colin Mathews, and it's called "Pluto the Renewer", not lord of the underworld.

  • @metallidude666 This definitely is no the Colin Mathews version of Pluto. Does any one else have an idea?

  • Can I buy this song anywhere online? I've looked on iTunes and couldn't find it, but I'm not sure I was looking for the right name or composer.

  • Sounds pretty alright... but this title shouldn't have Holst anywhere near the name. That's a travesty and it shames Holst's name.

  • -Hugs Pluto-

    You will always be a planet to me.

  • Holst didn't write this, you know...

  • Pluto is no longer a planet. Holst will have to refund the money to us immediately he made from royalties from this song that is no longer valid.

  • whatever .. synths

  • This is really creepy, but it is completely awesome!

  • Mary Magdalene helped me search for Aliens!

  • This is NOT the Colin Matthews composition (Pluto, the Renewer), as was previously mentioned. It doesn't even slightly resemble it; the Matthews composition is not even tonal.

  • Finally i come to Youtube and learn somthing That you for the non-ignorance here lol

  • @EVILgnarlygnome Apparently, you don't understand what sarcasm is. And your assumption of how I classify the solar system is incorrect, also.

  • @EVILgnarlygnome My, touched a nerve, haven't we?

    Your own answer was good enough for me.

    And it doesn't matter in the long run if Pluto is a planet or not.

    All that matters is that God put it there for everyone to enjoy, bicker about, or write music for.

    And you don't dare call GOD a moron, do you?

  • @EVILgnarlygnome Well, I guess I am an obtuse idiot. I don't allow organizations to rule my life, and I consider it wrong to alter the shape of the solar system just to suit the vanity of science.

    It's also wrong to call Percival Lowell an 'obtuse idiot'. He used much of his life to find Pluto, and now, because of this IAU, his remarkable discovery is thus rendered pointless. Shameful.

  • @EVILgnarlygnome Oh? I didn't know being retained or held back had anything to do with astronomy. And do you really have to have a lesser sense of intelligence or mental fitness to believe in something that teachers had taught you (and others) for decades? I have always believed that Pluto was a planet, and now, because of this, I'm mentally ill. Really...

  • @daneeloo Your grammar is terrible. Your comment that somehow garnered 13 likes makes absolutely no sense. You're either an idiot or a troll.

  • @daneeloo You're grammar is terrible. Your comment that somehow garnered 13 likes makes absolutely no sense. You're either an idiot or a troll.

  • There are also dwarf planets located in between the planets we consider part of the eight.

  • I think they might change their minds once their probe gets there. great song regardless

  • What is the real name of this song? Its actually not from Gustav Holst or Colin Matthews. What is this really from????? I want to figure this out cause everyone on the internet has got it wrong. plz help get this straight

  • All this song does is tell the forbidden zone that is Los Angeles High School Culture

  • "Pluto was discovered in 1930, four years before Holst's death, and was hailed by astronomers as the ninth planet. Holst, however, expressed no interest in writing a movement for the new planet. He had become disillusioned by the popularity of the suite, believing that it took too much attention away from his other works. In 2000, the Hallé Orchestra commissioned the English composer Colin Matthews, an authority on Holst, to write a new eighth movement, which he called "Pluto, the Renewer"."

  • epic chimes and timpini at about 3:06 <33

  • who really cares if pluto is a planet or not,this post is not about pointless debates and self importance but more from a dude who loves music and want's to share it

  • Pluto was big enough for your mom...

  • Totally expected this to be a rick roll

  • If you people haven't noticed.. This is suppose to be about the music, not the astronomy of the piece. Let us all just enjoy the music.

  • I like this piece of music

  • It is the piece Pluto, lord of the underworld, but it's not by Holst. It's by Colin Mathews, in memory of Holst.

  • lord of the underworld (bwah,ha,ha)

  • i like pluto too much to consider just an oversized iceshard or meteor with three moons and is as big as mercury or almost the size of mercury

  • @youngpop1000 Well actually it is considerably smaller than Mercury plus it is not classified as an oversized iceshard or meteor it is actually classed as a Dwarf Planet so it maintains some of its significance in the Solar System however I do agree that i'm sad to see it declassified as I like Pluto too especially considering that recent studies have shown that Pluto might be larger than Eris after all.

  • Of course, it's not from Holst. However, as any music, we can argue about its quality: someone will like it and some others will dislike it :S

    I don't care a shit about what Astronomers can say... but in Astrology, Pluto WORKS. Even discovered in 1930 by Clyde Tombaugh, there are enough studies about its influence and progression. Astronomers are only "scientists". people who only believe in what they can see (bah)...

  • We all know its not Gustav Holst and never did he write an eighth movement but can we all just enjoy it...i mean its not horrible but it aint Holst either. I kind of enjoyed it.

  • It's ok Pluto, I'm not a planet either.

  • It's ok Pluto, I'm not a planet either.

  • Ummm, is this from Holst's MICKEY MAUS suite?

  • @Stepper11 \m/ lol

  • Hey guys.....Holst wrote pluto???Really? How cool........I am gonna tell all my friends!

  • Holst never wrote Pluto because he knew it wasn't a planet

  • @MrPerfs no Pluto hadnt been discovered til years after he wrote Neptune

  • It's so sad that Holst didn't want to continue writing Pluto to add to the Planets when it was discovered .. he did the other planets and they were all so awesome .. especially Jupiter!!! But, the guy who wrote this was awesome too ...

  • Holst never wrote a Pluto. And this is definitely nowhere near the quality of Holst's 'The Planets' - which wasn't even his better work!

  • this in not Holst!!!!!!!!!!!!!! um hello if you know history pluto was found very shorty before he died!!!!!!!!! so saying that this is Holst is an insult to his creative genius!!!!!!!!! the thought of insulting an amazing composer like him is just sicking

  • this is not holst's, as everyone has already said. i do like it though, a lot, even though it sounds nothing like his style, haha. however, "lord of the underworld"? uh, no. not this music anyway. especially not the happy ending. beautiful, but not the theme.

  • midi... fail

  • Wtf??? Sounds like a bad Indiana Jones knock-off score. Shouldn't be labeled Holst!!

  • Well, I liked it. Said Eddie, hopefully. :-)

  • THE PLANET PRIMER by Roland Cheney - Part 1 The Sun. Blazing, burning, golden orb, Shines that others may absorb. Mercury. Freezing cold, seething blast, Spins but once, in orbit fast. Venus. Beauty, brightness, hovering, Veiled in her torrid fling. Earth--and the Moon. One alive, the other void, Double, whirling planetoid. Mars. Red, dun, magenta, gold, Crumbled ramparts, growing old. The Asteroids. Once a ball and now a ring, Composed of almost everything.
  • The Planet Primer by Roland Cheney - Part 2 Jupiter. One-eyed bubble, awesome thing, Circles in its wandering. Saturn. Banded planet, banded rings, Planet orbiting--on wings. Uranus. Drunken monster rolls about, North within and then without. Neptune. Giant ball of green and blue, Lost a planetoid or two. Pluto. Dim and dark, crystal stung, Tiny spark, the stars among.
  • This is absolutely not Holst's music style. And it was written by Collin Mathews.

  • @TheBiggestMozartfan but this piece is not the writed by Collin Mathews. Explore that directed by Simon Rattle

  • Actually this was not written by Holst. Colin Matthews wrote it in the year 2000. Pluto was discovered before Holst's death but he was not of a mind to write a movement for it becuase he was distressed by the suite's popularity (yes!). Matthews, a scholar of Holst, was commissioned to write the piece because he could evoke the style of the original pieces.

  • make a new picture. and make sure you dont put Hoslt's name in it he. like Karlfalcon said that is being vain to him. he didnt write this so theres no need to count this as his. he died before pluto became a planet

  • Holst NEVER wrote a movement for Pluto, because he didn't think the rest of the planets were especially good.

  • As far as the composition, it is very good. You shouldn't me so concerned with the name whereas the piece itself. If musicians weren't so worried about a name, they could actually see a good piece of music. Think about that the next time you say that. Because It's probably a lot better than anything you, or anyone else could compose.

  • @MonsterSpency3 It's good for an amateur, yes. But for the composer to be comparing it to one of the most famous composers in history is not only pretentious but undeserved. It doesn't fit the style of Holst and doesn't contain even a minute portion of the quality. This arrangement doesn't offer the complex metrical phrasings nor the competing submelodies and harmonies to an outstanding melody as do the pieces by Holst. It also does not convey the theme [of the name] properly, a key element.

  • If they wanna be lead astray they can. Instead of saying it's rather vain, you should say something more along the lines of it is not Holst. plain and simple. As far as the composition, it is very good. You shouldn't me so concerned with the name whereas the piece itself. If musicians weren't so worried about a name, they could actually see a good piece of music. Think about that the next time you say that. Because It's probably a lot better than anything you, or anyone else could compose.

  • (Pluto was discovered in 1930, Holst died in 1934, he did NOT want to write another planets piece) I personally think this is better than some of the others... It sounds much more like his pieces than "The Renewer" and it follows a mirror opposition with Mercury. Mercury is light and bouncy; this is forlorn and decrepit. If it wasn't in midi I'm sure it would also sound a LOT better.

  • to call this Holst is more than a disgrace, as his composition was written from 1914 to 1918, and history notes the discovery of pluto as being in 1930, which was 4 years after Holst died, therefore, there is NO WAY he would have known about the discovery to write a composition for it, however, a man named Collin Mathews DID write a composition entitled Pluto, The Renewer

  • I agree that this shouldn't be labeled as Holst and it does sound a but like a midi, but the actual piece isn't half bad in my opinion.

  • pretty awful, sounds like a midi prog producing the score of a ps1 game. Not G. Holst's style with none of his real flare, to call this Holst is fraud. It may be a tribute but it's a fairly poor one. Others have crafted better plutos to complete this suite

  • Wow. Dumbasses. Cuz Pluto was totally discovered in 1914 when holst wrote The Planets.. what a shame.

  • Best one

  • Pluto, Jupiter and Mars are my favorites

  • This is really a disgrace.

  • This is from that old program Nine Worlds, isn't it?

  • Not, that names are coincident because the astrological meaning of Mercury and Mars are the same that the meaning of the roman gods, but the meaning of the names of the movement are just astrological (and the name of one movement is the same of a chapter of a book about Astrology), as Holst told, really Holst was obsessed with occultism and similar things, as you can check if you read about him.

  • well its worth a go. no harm done. He's caught Holst's style ok.

  • pluto no planet, eh?

  • It used to be a planet :)

  • sounds really bad

  • Pluto´s movement was a continuation of "The planets", but Holst is not the writer, because Holst died in 1934 and this movement is date in 2000 year.

    Also, the nickname is not "Lord of the underworld", else "The renewer", because "The planets" has not relation with greek-roman myths and deities, where Pluto is the god of the Hades and Lord of the underworld, it´s a sign of ignorante, because de sense of the entire suite is the relation of the planets with astrology, which Holst believe in.

  • (following)

    The names of the other movements are conected with his astrological meanings, and some of them are agree with the characters of the roman gods, but not all the planets has relation with their similar roman god (as Jupiter).

    Also, if the meaning were the roman gods, why there aren´t any movement for Terra (Gea), god of Earth?, just in astrology has sense thinking in planets without think in Earth.

    I don´t believe in Astrology, but Gustav Holst did it.

  • @daneeloo astrology is supposedly based on the position of other planets in relation to earth, anyway, god of rock is hard to make music by

  • There is 2 movements related to Mythology....Mercury-the Winged Messenger and Mars-the Bringer of War.

    Mercury was the Roman god of trade. The messenger. And Mars was the roman god of war. So "The Planets" is slightly related to Mythology.

  • @daneeloo Actually he'd considered and started it (I think... citation needed) but discontinued. However was picked up and finished later.

  • @daneeloo You know what else is a sign of ignorance? How terrible your spelling and grammar is.

  • Holst didn't write this because Pluto hadn't been discovered at the time. but other composers/writers have written pieces for Pluto.

  • @SpiderRiderKya Pluto was actually discovered four years before Holst died. Holst never had any intention on writing a piece for it, either. Then he died a few years later. :(

  • it sounds sorta like the background music for doom, i love it!!!!!

  • Pluto is most definetly a planet, Big Poppa E says so in his Ode to Pluto.

  • @mistyjocasta. yeah, well if that's so, then there are rings around Uranus

  • There are times when this melody reminds me of THE DEVIL'S TRIANGLE by King Crimson.

    The television show called IN SEARCH OF... with Leonard Nimoy as your host used to play this King Crimson composition whenever they wanted to do a show about the Bermuda Triangle.

    Other than that, the sound is somber, eerie, and invokes deep from within the mind that which most humans are afraid to face.

    Interesting conterpoint too, and the talent of this composer still makes me want to listen to his work.

  • Yea actually holst did not feel like writing pluto because the planets distracted everyone from all his other works so he never wanted to write one but they commissioned Colin Matthews to write Pluto, the renewer.

  • Definitely not Holst......doesn't even sound like his work. I don't like it....especially that someone is using his name on something he didn't write.

  • Pretty Sick. I like this more than some of Holst's Work.

  • 1:34 to 2:05 is so Fucking Badass

  • @SuperGoldfish1999 Well, not needed to insult :-)) Apart from this, we complaint about the fact that Holst did not show any interest on "completion" of his masterpiece.

  • Yes, pluto isnt a planet anymore. Get over it, honestly.

  • That's alright if some Astronomers don't consider Pluto to be a planet anymore...I don't consider them to be Astronomers either.

  • @GardenerH2O

    nice comment. I agree.

    But i gotta congratulate u on the comment, tottaly AWSOME! ;)

  • @GardenerH2O Yes, but they are experts in their field simply trying to keep scientific terminology consistant. Your opinion is of absolutely no consequence

  • @GardenerH2O pluto is not a planet it is a drawf planet it is to far and too smal to be a planet it is a ball of ice with a even smaller ball of ice orbitting it, this is very common with a large astaroidord in this case dwaf planet pluto is a big dwaf planet it should be a astaroid it is smaller than our moon

  • @GardenerH2O pluto is not a planet it is a drawf planet it is to far and too smal to be a planet it is a ball of ice with a even smaller ball of ice orbitting it, this is very common with a large astaroidord in this case dwaf planet pluto is a big dwaf planet it should be a astaroid it is smaller than our moon

  • @TheBarty92 it has planet in it's name, yet it is not a planet? We need to talk to our fucking astronomers.

  • @hnrksl a planet as what we talk to be a full sized planet has to fit into a criteria their are loads of drawf planets and pluto is to small to be a planet and is big for a drawf planet its a ball of ice in a huge orbit i think it should be a astorired

  • @TheBarty92 ok I understand what you meant now, and I'm only replying because if I don't, 50 other people will spam me with the same answer.

  • @GardenerH2O there are hundreds of other dwarf planets in our solar system just like pluto so if u count pluto as a planet u have to count them as well

  • @1516Tom in our galaxy yes but not in our solar system unless you are counting some of jupiter's moons....

  • @stiffmajjthegiant no, beyond the orbit of Neptune there are lots of the other dwarf planets just like pluto such as eris, makemake and haumea.

  • @GardenerH2O lol too bad whether or not they're astronomers is not up for question. It's called science.

  • @GardenerH2O The problem is that we have found ALOT of bodies in the solar system of similar or larger size than pluto - so we could either cut pluto as a planet or add dozens of new ones

  • isn't it Pluto, the Renewer?

    that's the one I have on my iPod. I'm aware that there were like three different compositions of Pluto after Holst's death but i thought Renewer was the only one that was officially published

  • To be fair, this kind of suits. Pity Pluto isn`t a planet

  • holst didnt composed a pluto but many others right their pluto which some maybe floating around somwherw but it isn't holst

  • wicked chill name for it and its ok but a bit too gamer ff but awesome job anyways!

  • This is so not Holst but it's still kinda cool

  • Hmm..

    I don't hate it, but I don't like it all that much either.

    Holst would have had something better in mind. His compositions were simply genius.

  • Were this an actual symphonic recording, it would be pretty cool. It's no Holst, but it's still a good piece of music, and IMHO better than Pluto: The Renewer by Colin Matthews.

  • yea i was wondering if this was his work, but thought it couldn't be because some of the sounds sound like they come from a synthasizer or something

  • You're right...it kind of does.

  • This couldnt possibly be Holst as Pluto wasnt classed as a planet in Holsts Lifetime!!!

  • Actually Pluto was discovered 4 years before Holst's death. But you are technically correct, the best kind of correct, this is not Holst.

  • This is not a holst composition! Seriously I like this one but nothing beats Holst's own music

  • What the fuck?

  • pluto wasnt done by holst

  • the three notes that keep repeating are the first four that keep repeating in nepune.

  • ehh i felt nothing when i heard this

    good effort tho

    real intruments would be nice too

  • Actually, there is already a "Pluto", by Collin Matthews who wrote "Pluto: The Renewer" In memory of Holst and his daughter, who not only was an inspiration for THE PLANETS and sang in the Choir for for "Venus", but was rumored to ask his ill dad in finishing the Planets.... He just didn't care for the Planets and thought people were overreacting their praise toward . Once she died, Holst's student, Matthews, made Pluto: The Renewer This is just Synth and a cheap Mars knock-off :(

  • Please do not label this as Holst. It is rather vain and insulting to his memory. We do not want to lead some poor soul astray, now do we.

  • WTF is this crap?

    I'm offended for Holst!

  • @Karlfalcon, exactly.. he didn't even consider writing anything about pluto, even though it was found 4 years before he died.

  • @Karlfalcon Thanks for undeceiving me. Colin Matthews actually wrote this piece. On Wikipedia "The planets" (section 4.1) it says that "He [Holst] had become disillusioned by the popularity of the suite, believing that it took too much attention away from his other works.

  • Comment removed

  • @Karlfalcon someone's is a bigot

  • @phebo1986

    I do not think that word means what you think it means.

  • this actually not that bad

    if you showed me this when i first herd the planets i would of believed that it was part of it but that was long long ago

  • Comment removed

  • Actually, he wal still alive when Pluto was discovered. However, he chose not to write a piece for Pluto anyway... but you are right, he probably had the last laugh.

  • no.. he lived to see pluto be discovered but he decided not to write anything

  • If we all know what you know, we would know very little indeed.

    Pluto - discovered 1930

    Holst - died 1934

    He only didn't write another movement for Pluto because he did not feel The Planets was that great a work to begin with.

  • He was wrong.... "The Planets" is an EXCELLENT work!!! At least I think so... :)

  • A good effort, but doesn't quite capture the sound of Holst. Would be better if real instruments were used, as real instruments have a wider range of expressiveness than synthed counterparts on a keyboard. I still commend you for your compositional ability, if it was you who wrote this.

  • this is terrible! its all synth! nothing even close to classical music! i dont picture the underworld! this is just flashy experimental crap!

  • Ok, I appreciate your effort, it's interesting and quite nice work, but to me it would suit Starcraft (especially if it was a movie, not a videogame). Good work, but not Holst style, but keep on working.

  • It sounds like the theme music of a low budget Sci-Fi movie from the year 1989

  • Indeed, is fairly creepy done and sinthethized, and reminds me of that Burzum "unofficial prison release".

    I am sorry, but it has not the epic, orchestral atmosphere of The Planets Suite (and I am not speaking about the instruments, but the composition itself).

    However, it would fit, as much, a videogame.

  • poor effort.......

  • It's too techno to be part of the planets it should've been more orchestral the synthesizer and other electronic stuff ruins the whole piece

  • 4:41 - 5:48 was a nice try. That's only part I like. I'm sorry, it's just not Holst.

  • i dont care if its but holst or not its really cool

  • This is not Holst or Matthews version. It sounds too MIDI, in some part it's like a combination between Mars and Neptune and some part is like the music from Avatar. but some part around the end of minute 4 is nice.

  • This is not part of the planet suite and not writen by holst.

  • Yeah, seems very unlikely that Holst would have scribbled a note next to the score "Phase effect on some of the strings!"

  • This is terrible...

  • Apparently this is an original composition. NOT Holst. Not bad though. Pluto was not a part of this composition.

  • pluto was discovered in the 1950s one of the cosmoogical planets not mythological planets like holsts.

  • Oh no it's mythological alright

  • ...is this a disco? please, mr. "Matthews", I appreciate the good will, but this is too... 'not-Holst'.

  • ahaha 1:09 made me laugh way too much.

    I agree with the other people, this isn't Holst at all. In fact it sounds more like something you would get on Babylon 5 or maybe even Star Treck lol

  • this sounds so synthesized! -_-'

    not to sound redundant and repeat what ppl just said...but Pluto wasn't even discovered at the time, so Holst couldn't possibly have written this

    the descending thing at 1:27 made me laugh lmao! :D

  • Pluto wasnt discovered yet =_=''' therefore he never wrote a section for Pluto. O_o

    composers after him wrote a suite for Pluto . .and i believe Collin Matthews wrote the "official version".

  • ITS NOT HOLST and to be honest it sounds too 80s, but it would be cool if holst did write one on pluto as he was lord of the underworld.

  • this is a fake....holst never composed pluto.....

    the music isn't even acoustic either...

  • If this is Holst, I'm Hans Zimmer.

  • Maybe you are...

  • Hehe, are you kidding? I wish.

  • lol :)

  • Who is the composer of this piece? I found this one on Limewire a few years ago but I know it isn't Holst and i looked up another guy who wrote a piece for Pluto but his song sounded nothing like this.

  • Holst did not do Pluto or Earth because in his time they didn't dicovered Pluto and he didn't do Earth because he didn't know what it looked like.

  • A frisbee was originaly called a pluto platter because pluto was discovered in the 1950s when this toy became a fad .

  • umm just to tell you guys Holst did not compose this peice.During his time I think 1914? Pluto was not founded but four years after his death they discovered Pluto so he did not write this peice.

  • Ummm... do they have an Earth movement?

  • No, he didn't make an movement for Earth... nor Pluto (it wasn't a planet and he had no desire to continue the Planets), someone else decided to do it for him.