I really like the long and gradual buildups - I think it can't get any bigger, and it does. Then it turns around and starts over again, just like a wildly passionate romance... nice.
Reversed video ?! I don't think so. As for the pianist, almost everyone's style or preferences or improvising is objectionable by definition... but I wouldn't say he's not a musician (not to mention something like "he will never be a musician"). He is, indeed, a great player. Yes, I would make a shorter, simpler version, but we don't know how much they've rehearsed together. Anyway... I've enjoyed it a lot.
Did you notice the video is reversed? Look at the 'note crazy' pianist and the high notes are on the left. He is a musician, just not an accompanist yet. Yes I like this singer. As to piano support....this does NOT remind me of the musical magic between Nancy Lamott and her pianist Christopher Marlowe. They had divine magic. Christopher is a wise pianist with a legato line. Nancy Lamott was an angle indeed. In 1995 she began singing with the angels herself. Lucky Angels. John-Hans
I agree with taidlay - the singer is very good, but the piano player, who has had the enormous benefit of a musical education, is not, and never will be, a musician.
I wanted to skip the attention seeking pianist, who did not work well with this exceptional singer - made me wonder what this version would have been with a more sensitive musician.
I really like the long and gradual buildups - I think it can't get any bigger, and it does. Then it turns around and starts over again, just like a wildly passionate romance... nice.
nloxford 7 months ago
Reversed video ?! I don't think so. As for the pianist, almost everyone's style or preferences or improvising is objectionable by definition... but I wouldn't say he's not a musician (not to mention something like "he will never be a musician"). He is, indeed, a great player. Yes, I would make a shorter, simpler version, but we don't know how much they've rehearsed together. Anyway... I've enjoyed it a lot.
guticr 1 year ago
Did you notice the video is reversed? Look at the 'note crazy' pianist and the high notes are on the left. He is a musician, just not an accompanist yet. Yes I like this singer. As to piano support....this does NOT remind me of the musical magic between Nancy Lamott and her pianist Christopher Marlowe. They had divine magic. Christopher is a wise pianist with a legato line. Nancy Lamott was an angle indeed. In 1995 she began singing with the angels herself. Lucky Angels. John-Hans
johnnyzing 1 year ago
I agree with taidlay - the singer is very good, but the piano player, who has had the enormous benefit of a musical education, is not, and never will be, a musician.
laug66 1 year ago
reminds me of Billie Holiday.Beautiful
lovethatjazz1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEXT! Don't quit your day job, honey!
BustyBlonde1983 2 years ago
I wanted to skip the attention seeking pianist, who did not work well with this exceptional singer - made me wonder what this version would have been with a more sensitive musician.
taidlay 3 years ago 4
That's a beautiful voice
cmmndrblu 3 years ago 4
Very nice.
BrendaJoi 3 years ago 4
amazing voice!!!!
Damienvizuete 3 years ago 4