I watched 2012 (2009) in Science Class today. I thought that 2012 was a very entertaining disaster movie but the dialogue is terribly funny. 4 out 5 stars.
oh. I missed you man. I always need a good reminder of how I will succeed in life and you will fail miserably. Your comments are always welcome. Oh wait. Nah. I dont like you very much. Get a life bro.
Rowan isn't trying to destroy the white house as many times as he can, he is just reenacting what Canadians did to it twice before. Except without the aliens or water.
i liked the movie two but i forgot did moutin everist get coverd by water two or no becuse if it did theres some fake crap right the that would never hapen
This movie was long and boring. SOme of the effects was so fake looking. Some parts look like Im watching a videogame. This movie is aim for teens or people with an iq of 70.
I love cheesy disaster films & 2012 is one of the best. I think the destruction being funny was the intended effect. If he made it dark & reminded you that youre watching billions die, it stops being fun. He saved the drama for the main characters & the destruction was just spectacle. By the way, that wasnt the real Eiffel tower. It was the one on top of the Paris hotel, they were in Vegas, remember?
I disagreed some but still great review, LOL at your panicked packing demonstration.
The part about the ifle tower, they were in vagas and the ifle tower is in paris am i right. So they prolly hit sumthing else. Yeah and your right about the last part lol. The people had no clue with all the wired activity that was going on. like all them strong earthquakes. No one even think that sumthing was wrong. like whats up with that part. But anyways this movie was really really awesome. I love the special effects.
Tom, thank you for the review, I have been watching your reviews for a while and while I enjoy your perspective, I am slightly confused, why have you been increasingly using the 'F' word over and over in your reviews? I do not watch movie reviews for 'street humor' I watch them to get an honest opinion of the film in question.
you have the potential to be a great film critic, but I have never seen Rodger Ebert, Michael Philips, or any other respected critic use profanity like this.
Sometimes, when I'm angry about something in a movie, I need it to really express my opinion. I know that it may be annoying to some, but I'm not trying to be like Ebert or Phillips. I'm trying to be an average joe reviewer who actually knows his movies. I'll try to keep the profanity down in my next review.
Funny I can't seam to recall Richard Roeper ever saying that a movie should 'lick his balls' perhaps I missed that one.
I understand that you want to convey emotions Tom, and I respect that a lot, but you truly have a great eye for critiquing film and you could take that to a real career, it would be a shame if you tossed it away because of something silly like a choice of a profanity vs. a commonly acceptable term that could make the same statement.
perhaps it is what makes great speakers or writers great is the ability make you feel like someone said 'go F**k yourself' without actually saying it.
Wow Get2TheDeLorean, you really got me with that... I had no idea that this was youtube, for some reason I thought that this was something else, something in which people might actualy act mature. silly me.
Yeah its 2012 now and the world is NOT! going to END! get over it
TheKydogg 3 days ago
I'm watching this is 20...
Death2RockwayMiddle 1 month ago
I watched 2012 (2009) in Science Class today. I thought that 2012 was a very entertaining disaster movie but the dialogue is terribly funny. 4 out 5 stars.
Hectorferjr2 1 year ago
20+1+2=23
OH NO!
StartStopReplay 1 year ago
I thought the Eiffel Tower scene was a replica. They were supposed to be in Las Vegas in that scene. It wasn't the actual thing.
parkerball35 1 year ago
your reaction
seems like Cloverfield lol
woodsy1234567890 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
movie sucked balls
shaybutta11208 1 year ago
AMEN!!! haha. nice Dark Knight poster in the background, by the way.
tracer8410 2 years ago
Independence day is nice movie.
And I enjoyed Godzilla.
But Day after toomarow? Oh God.
2012? Still didn't watch that load.
Mesina2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is a great movie, I managed to watch it online for free at: viewfilmsfree . c o m
lylelehmannbr 2 years ago
oh. I missed you man. I always need a good reminder of how I will succeed in life and you will fail miserably. Your comments are always welcome. Oh wait. Nah. I dont like you very much. Get a life bro.
TomChatalbash 2 years ago
Rowan isn't trying to destroy the white house as many times as he can, he is just reenacting what Canadians did to it twice before. Except without the aliens or water.
OutlookJonas 2 years ago
lol Tom you rock. Great review I thought the exact same thing! Keep doing those funny comments!
PenguinsCanFly13 2 years ago
i liked the movie two but i forgot did moutin everist get coverd by water two or no becuse if it did theres some fake crap right the that would never hapen
personboy4 2 years ago
This movie was long and boring. SOme of the effects was so fake looking. Some parts look like Im watching a videogame. This movie is aim for teens or people with an iq of 70.
Bloodsport1 2 years ago
u copy
rideonpony 2 years ago
Awesome review - I enjoyed it much more than the film! ;)
GabnDad 2 years ago
Well everyone, on December 21, 2012, We will see, won't we !
ART1975CZ 2 years ago
yeah and when that day comes and it ends ill be like "Thats it"?
AshXXMayftw 2 years ago
lol Ill be like "IS THAT ALL YOU GOT MAYANS!!!"
PenguinsCanFly13 2 years ago
Ill be like "Hahahahah how smart are ya now".
AshXXMayftw 2 years ago
ITS ALL BULSSHIT
nellyg65 2 years ago
It was the Las Vegas replica Eiffel Tower. Come on.
predator123 2 years ago 2
dont forget that they were headed for China so its possible it could have been the real one
AshXXMayftw 2 years ago
Watch the film again my friend they were in Las Vegas not Paris.
predator123 2 years ago
nonetheless it was stupid how they laughed about it. Relax bro.
TomChatalbash 2 years ago 2
lol
loupremo 2 years ago
how old are you guy?
symbol93 2 years ago
in the 60's and 70's we had Irwin Allen as the Master of Disaster
rextrek 2 years ago
I love cheesy disaster films & 2012 is one of the best. I think the destruction being funny was the intended effect. If he made it dark & reminded you that youre watching billions die, it stops being fun. He saved the drama for the main characters & the destruction was just spectacle. By the way, that wasnt the real Eiffel tower. It was the one on top of the Paris hotel, they were in Vegas, remember?
I disagreed some but still great review, LOL at your panicked packing demonstration.
trekkerbud 2 years ago
The part about the ifle tower, they were in vagas and the ifle tower is in paris am i right. So they prolly hit sumthing else. Yeah and your right about the last part lol. The people had no clue with all the wired activity that was going on. like all them strong earthquakes. No one even think that sumthing was wrong. like whats up with that part. But anyways this movie was really really awesome. I love the special effects.
cashmoneyyard 2 years ago
This movie had alot of different characters.
cashmoneyyard 2 years ago
Lol it's a good movie but I don't see the story behind it.
Azelf3 2 years ago
I think they were chuckling when they almost hit the Eiffel Tower because it wasn't the real one, just a replica in Vegas..
phexus82 2 years ago
Why the hell would they laugh still?
TomChatalbash 2 years ago
Ha ha, cos of you I'm going to book a ticket.
yodasteveo 2 years ago
tom, i absolutely love the way u speak from the heart. AMAZING REVIEW!
I would love to meet u one day.
Mr321BOOM 2 years ago
The first hour was promising, but the next two hours (!) were repetitive in blowing shit up. I gave it a 2.5/5. Nice review!
griffyfan 2 years ago
I absolutly loved this movie I give it 50000/5
AshXXMayftw 2 years ago
LOl this is such a funny review! Great review!
Ray123456712345678 2 years ago
your opinion is the same as mine. absolute bullshit
rampagingacorn 2 years ago
LOL, "PS 1000 BC, sucked my balls..."
TimH078 2 years ago
the letter sketch was hilarious
johnluvsluna 2 years ago
this was the funniest review ever
MikeBannShow 2 years ago
i will not love the movie the 2012 and the end is ball ass. and good movie review man.
0mrjoker 2 years ago
It's funny how you say typecasting, like he's being forced to direct these movies. I'll have to say it was my favorite Emmerich film.
bramb600 2 years ago
You forgot Stargate and 10,000 bc
MetaPunkXP 2 years ago
haha the part with the deer cracked me up
WarHawk03668452 2 years ago
GREAT REVIEW!!!!!
cgtexastechtd 2 years ago
im just curious does John Cuzak and his family survive the end of the world thats all I want to know please tell me.
AshXXMayftw 2 years ago
Great review dude, like always!
ThePissedOff 2 years ago
which had better visuals?
watchmen?
or 2012?
wantsomecake328 2 years ago
Good question. Probably Watchmen, but 2012 had some great effects though.
TomChatalbash 2 years ago
Tom, thank you for the review, I have been watching your reviews for a while and while I enjoy your perspective, I am slightly confused, why have you been increasingly using the 'F' word over and over in your reviews? I do not watch movie reviews for 'street humor' I watch them to get an honest opinion of the film in question.
you have the potential to be a great film critic, but I have never seen Rodger Ebert, Michael Philips, or any other respected critic use profanity like this.
RationalRoundtable 2 years ago
Sometimes, when I'm angry about something in a movie, I need it to really express my opinion. I know that it may be annoying to some, but I'm not trying to be like Ebert or Phillips. I'm trying to be an average joe reviewer who actually knows his movies. I'll try to keep the profanity down in my next review.
TomChatalbash 2 years ago
roger ebert sucks
LazyCritic08 2 years ago
Richard Roeper does it a lot.
bramb600 2 years ago
Funny I can't seam to recall Richard Roeper ever saying that a movie should 'lick his balls' perhaps I missed that one.
I understand that you want to convey emotions Tom, and I respect that a lot, but you truly have a great eye for critiquing film and you could take that to a real career, it would be a shame if you tossed it away because of something silly like a choice of a profanity vs. a commonly acceptable term that could make the same statement.
RationalRoundtable 2 years ago
perhaps it is what makes great speakers or writers great is the ability make you feel like someone said 'go F**k yourself' without actually saying it.
RationalRoundtable 2 years ago
...this is youtube douche bag.
Get2TheDeLorean 2 years ago
Wow Get2TheDeLorean, you really got me with that... I had no idea that this was youtube, for some reason I thought that this was something else, something in which people might actualy act mature. silly me.
RationalRoundtable 2 years ago
Glad I was able to bring you back down to earth!
Get2TheDeLorean 2 years ago
um.... yeah... sure... whatever you say.
RationalRoundtable 2 years ago
i liked it mostly for the special effects
BraedanW12 2 years ago
and the 2 hr and 38 mins felt like 1 hr 40 mins
BraedanW12 2 years ago
lol these movies are getting repetitive
Kenkilla100 2 years ago