What was the shutdown problem? It says above a switch was suspect.. Or was it wired wrong?To kill a magneto fired motor, you ground the magneto out. Easy to have reversed, and also hard on the switch.
They didn't "leak" oil, per se. They utilized a "total loss" oiling system, as did many early engines. And Castor oil was the lubrication of choice in those days for many engines.
Castor oil is used in engines such as these as doesn't get diluted by the fuel/air mixture- it is able to lubricate as it is injected into the engine. It LEAVES the engine and blows EVERYWHERE, and was a reason for the goggles and long scarves of early aviators (had to wipe the face clean!)
I love when the engine starts here the first time and the fellow loses his hat. These engines were usually full throttle, all the time.
They used castor oil in these engines instead of other motor oil. I understand pilots would be coated with the stuff after some flights, and it could have some unhappy influence on their bowels if too much made its way into the mouth.
They used castor oil in these engines instead of other motor oil. I understand pilots would be coated with the stuff after some flights, and it could have some unhappy influence on their bowels if too much made its way into the mouth.
If I'm correct this isn't a replica? She won't run because she is an old old old cranky radial. Once you get her running she will be bulletproof though!!!! =)
I know its a little larger than the early 50hp version, but just imagine that thing spinning away 6 feet behind your head, as you're 400 feet in the air on a wood frame covered by fabric, held together by piano wire. With no ground communication!
It looks like a radial engine, but is different. A rotary engine has the cylinders rotating around the crankshaft, which stands still. The propellor is simply bolted on the engine. A radial engine has fixed cylinders and a rotating crankshaft.
Gnome rotary engines were widely used in World War I on fighter planes, built by Gnome Rhone factory and licencees on both sides of the conflict.
It looks like a radial engine, but is different. A rotary engine has the cylinders rotating around the crankshaft, which stands still. The propellor is simply bolted on the engine. A radial engine has fixed cylinders and a rotating crankshaft.
Gnome rotary engines were widely used in World War I on fighter planes, built by Gnome Rhone factory and licencees on both sides of the conflict.
Nope - rotary is the description, Gnome is the manufacturer. There were several manufacturers of rotary piston engines like this one, to include Le Rhone, Bentley, Gnome, and Clerget. Should be pretty obvious why they're called rotary, huh? :)
The term 'rotary engine' is often confused with the pistonless rotaries such as the Wankel engine (as made famous by NSU, Norton, and Mazda). As a general rule, rotary in aircraft terms means one of these guys!
Thank You, I would watch this engine and you guys running it a hundred times and still could enjoy more. It reminds me of my friend Ted (rest his soul) and I in better days. Thankx again, Markus Carwash Perry
Music to my ears :-). We've a wonderful living museum by me in NY (@Rhinebeck). They stopped running rotaries a few years back, much to my lament. I hope they correct that soon. They fly many planes there.
y do the whole engine spin whit the propeller why not just the crank spin the prop? dos'nt that thing work like a big gyroscope tilting the front down?
The engine gets very good cooling even when standing still on the ground, and they run quite smooth since the entire engine works as a flywheel. Some comparable non-rotaries added flywheels, but that's a lot of extra weight.
It has definite drawbacks, ofc. It's hard to scale them much further, and they were indeed quite gyroscopic. The Sopwith Camel was notoriously hard to fly for that reason. :)
1st: It was advantageous for cooling when the cylinders spinned around, since air-plane engines in World War I were air-cooled.
2nd: Radial engines in general, including the rotary ones, were significantly superior to the usual V-motors, which is why constructors were willing to use them despite their detriments.
3rd: Yes, rotary motors had the problem of being large and having a gyroscopic effect. This is why they were abandoned soon after the V-motors catched up with their performance.
They made a new stronger engine every couple months during world war 1 when planes were introduced. That's gotta be the reason it's still in working order.
The 9n Gnome Monosopape was pretty much the limit of Rotary engine development, you needed exponentially bigger engines to get small increases in power beyond that. They went more with Radial and Inlines after WWI.
The engine was in a surviving original N.28 as far as I know, and the plane hadn't been flown since the '20s. Was basically like finding a classic car in a barn- everything was intact and in working order, just needed TLC and knowhow to bring it back to life.
The Siemens Halske SH.III and the Bentley BR2 were the height of rotary engines. The Halske had a real throttle and the BR2 was 250+ HP, which the monsoupape couldn't hold a candle to.
If someone attempted to make a rotary today, it would probably be lighter and produce far more horsepower than they did 90 years ago. I remember seeing somewhere that someone was making a new Bentley BR2.
Hey guy's this was realy great , I think your grounding system was posibly reversed on the switches . Try switching the positive and grounding wires thats on the switches.
It looks like you needed one of those safety straps attached to Greg, so he wouldn't blow across the field. LOL Still, after 80 years, it looked and sounded great!
What was the shutdown problem? It says above a switch was suspect.. Or was it wired wrong?To kill a magneto fired motor, you ground the magneto out. Easy to have reversed, and also hard on the switch.
sprintfan1 8 months ago
They didn't "leak" oil, per se. They utilized a "total loss" oiling system, as did many early engines. And Castor oil was the lubrication of choice in those days for many engines.
sprintfan1 8 months ago
Castor oil is used in engines such as these as doesn't get diluted by the fuel/air mixture- it is able to lubricate as it is injected into the engine. It LEAVES the engine and blows EVERYWHERE, and was a reason for the goggles and long scarves of early aviators (had to wipe the face clean!)
I love when the engine starts here the first time and the fellow loses his hat. These engines were usually full throttle, all the time.
jdos2 4 months ago
Nice hairdo, dude! ;)
smilingbeast 8 months ago
Hi there - what’s the Castor Oil used for! Or have I misunderstood
Billyking1313 9 months ago
@Billyking1313
They used castor oil in these engines instead of other motor oil. I understand pilots would be coated with the stuff after some flights, and it could have some unhappy influence on their bowels if too much made its way into the mouth.
rseeton 8 months ago
@Billyking1313
They used castor oil in these engines instead of other motor oil. I understand pilots would be coated with the stuff after some flights, and it could have some unhappy influence on their bowels if too much made its way into the mouth.
rseeton 8 months ago
I just can´t get enough of 1:31
racinglad 9 months ago
@946HZJ It is called a gnome rotary but i think people are confusing it with a wankle rotary...
CobraRunescape 11 months ago
That's Greg Cone!
ColonelKlank 11 months ago
LOL at 1:30 it blew that dudes hat off
moplin1 1 year ago
lol at 1:30 it blew that dudes hat off XD
moplin1 1 year ago
@946HZJ: Its BOTH a rotary AND a radial
Hawaiifive01 1 year ago
WHY ARE YOU SHOUTING AT ME?!?
idlewild 1 year ago
too cool!
finkthefrosch06 1 year ago
How does the ignition system works? i gues there is no wiers to the cylinders.
eplefox1 1 year ago 5
@eplefox1 I think they have a magneto ignition system which is attached to the crankcase
hellraised187 9 months ago
If I'm correct this isn't a replica? She won't run because she is an old old old cranky radial. Once you get her running she will be bulletproof though!!!! =)
dasadler123 1 year ago
@dasadler123
its a rotary not a radial
946HZJ 1 year ago
@946HZJ Well rotary radial
simusfr 1 year ago
I know its a little larger than the early 50hp version, but just imagine that thing spinning away 6 feet behind your head, as you're 400 feet in the air on a wood frame covered by fabric, held together by piano wire. With no ground communication!
PeowPeowPeowLasers 1 year ago
better than gym room!..SPA...nice..keep on trying!..
GRATZIANI2002 1 year ago
It looks like a radial engine, but is different. A rotary engine has the cylinders rotating around the crankshaft, which stands still. The propellor is simply bolted on the engine. A radial engine has fixed cylinders and a rotating crankshaft.
Gnome rotary engines were widely used in World War I on fighter planes, built by Gnome Rhone factory and licencees on both sides of the conflict.
edwinhijmans 1 year ago
It looks like a radial engine, but is different. A rotary engine has the cylinders rotating around the crankshaft, which stands still. The propellor is simply bolted on the engine. A radial engine has fixed cylinders and a rotating crankshaft.
Gnome rotary engines were widely used in World War I on fighter planes, built by Gnome Rhone factory and licencees on both sides of the conflict.
edwinhijmans 1 year ago
In a radial engine the cylinders remain stationary. In a rotary, like this one, the cylinders spin.
enduserenduser 1 year ago
is rotary the brand/model name of this engine, because this looks like a radial engine.
rrrandommman 1 year ago
Nope - rotary is the description, Gnome is the manufacturer. There were several manufacturers of rotary piston engines like this one, to include Le Rhone, Bentley, Gnome, and Clerget. Should be pretty obvious why they're called rotary, huh? :)
The term 'rotary engine' is often confused with the pistonless rotaries such as the Wankel engine (as made famous by NSU, Norton, and Mazda). As a general rule, rotary in aircraft terms means one of these guys!
Alisterwolf66 1 year ago
What is the time between overhauls on these engines? I was told that they had to be overhauled every 15 hours or so- is this right?
Trailltrader 1 year ago
What is the time between overhauls on these engines? I was told that they had to be overhauled every 15 hours or so- is this right?
Trailltrader 1 year ago
What is the time between overhauls on these engines? I was told that they had to be overhauled every 15 hours or so- is this right?
Trailltrader 1 year ago
What is the time between overhauls on these engines? I was told that they had to be overhauled every 15 hours or so- is this right?
Trailltrader 1 year ago
What is the time between overhauls on these engines? I was told that they had to be overhauled every 15 hours or so- is this right?
Trailltrader 1 year ago
What is the time between overhauls on these engines? I was told that they had to be overhauled every 15 hours or so- is this right?
Trailltrader 1 year ago
that guy needs a shingle nail for his hat
silfossy 1 year ago
Thank You, I would watch this engine and you guys running it a hundred times and still could enjoy more. It reminds me of my friend Ted (rest his soul) and I in better days. Thankx again, Markus Carwash Perry
carwashvnvmc 2 years ago
EPA. LOL!
fdesmet2nerds 2 years ago
it blew the old mans helmet off.
fannybaba 2 years ago
Got it running correctly, see "1918 Gnome rotary engine running"
bldeagle 2 years ago
Music to my ears :-). We've a wonderful living museum by me in NY (@Rhinebeck). They stopped running rotaries a few years back, much to my lament. I hope they correct that soon. They fly many planes there.
neomuttley 2 years ago
@neomuttley
i am sooooo jealous that you life so close up there.
i had the Privilege to talk to Cole Palen on the phone early 90.
as i was doing research for a 1/3 scale Fokker DVIII
Avery nice extraordinary man :)
biglift1 1 year ago
y do the whole engine spin whit the propeller why not just the crank spin the prop? dos'nt that thing work like a big gyroscope tilting the front down?
rocketman468 2 years ago
It has a few benefits.
The engine gets very good cooling even when standing still on the ground, and they run quite smooth since the entire engine works as a flywheel. Some comparable non-rotaries added flywheels, but that's a lot of extra weight.
It has definite drawbacks, ofc. It's hard to scale them much further, and they were indeed quite gyroscopic. The Sopwith Camel was notoriously hard to fly for that reason. :)
dnebdal 2 years ago
1st: It was advantageous for cooling when the cylinders spinned around, since air-plane engines in World War I were air-cooled.
2nd: Radial engines in general, including the rotary ones, were significantly superior to the usual V-motors, which is why constructors were willing to use them despite their detriments.
3rd: Yes, rotary motors had the problem of being large and having a gyroscopic effect. This is why they were abandoned soon after the V-motors catched up with their performance.
Tholomaios 2 years ago
All radial engines are known to leak oil like sieves.
OOZ662 2 years ago
ahhahahaha 1:33 XD
TheLaurencekid 2 years ago
LOL lost your hat mate!
simonspiers 2 years ago
Andrew,
Glad to see your progress. My Omega is up and runnung as you have seen. I hope to get into the 160 soon. Let me know if you need anything.
T.K.
kozaero 2 years ago
They made a new stronger engine every couple months during world war 1 when planes were introduced. That's gotta be the reason it's still in working order.
samipso 2 years ago
The 9n Gnome Monosopape was pretty much the limit of Rotary engine development, you needed exponentially bigger engines to get small increases in power beyond that. They went more with Radial and Inlines after WWI.
The engine was in a surviving original N.28 as far as I know, and the plane hadn't been flown since the '20s. Was basically like finding a classic car in a barn- everything was intact and in working order, just needed TLC and knowhow to bring it back to life.
Treize69 2 years ago
The Siemens Halske SH.III and the Bentley BR2 were the height of rotary engines. The Halske had a real throttle and the BR2 was 250+ HP, which the monsoupape couldn't hold a candle to.
If someone attempted to make a rotary today, it would probably be lighter and produce far more horsepower than they did 90 years ago. I remember seeing somewhere that someone was making a new Bentley BR2.
GGigabiteM 2 years ago
Hey guy's this was realy great , I think your grounding system was posibly reversed on the switches . Try switching the positive and grounding wires thats on the switches.
Other than that , It was wounderful.
watchdog3 2 years ago
It looks like you needed one of those safety straps attached to Greg, so he wouldn't blow across the field. LOL Still, after 80 years, it looked and sounded great!
Fait2 2 years ago