Why didn't the Pentagon CRUMBLE to dust? It was "hit' by a "plane" fully loaded with jet fuel. It had fires throughout. The entire building should have turned to "talcum powder" and fallen straight down into it's own footprint! So, why are the "governments so called Laws of "Physics" different in the case of the Pentagon? Hit by a plane, jet fuel, fires,same situation as WTC Towers, it should have "disintegrated! We all know the reason the roof collapsed was from the water from the fire hoses!
Pentagon: Where is the plane? What an E-4B plane was doing flying over washington on 9/11? Show the footage of a 757 hiting the building! I dare the Pentagon to release the footage! I dare them to do so!
As for the Pentagon Building , Any one who has a brain knows that the hole in the pentagon isn't large enough for a Boeing 757 to had made. It was a missle . Oddly , some of the witness's who said they actually saw the JET hit the pentagon had a mid-eastern accent ? I would like to have them interviewed again . Also , in the interview , we never saw their faces ? Total BS.
I find the British coverage fair, as far as I've seen it. What I don't find fair is the line of crap being fed to us by our government. Al-Qaeda may have had something to do with 9/11, but so did the government. George Bush was in bed with Bin Laden for many years. There's paperwork to back me up. Go check out the Arbusto papers. I dare you.
Multiple news sources have reported that building 7 was on fire in multiple areas for over 6 hours, not to mention it was hit by debris from the twin towers. But if you want to continue thinking it was explosives, feel free. O.o
Yes it is true. However steel framed buildings do not collapse because of fires. Even when a steel framed building is totally burned by an all day long raging fire the structure still survives.
The Windsor Tower in Madrid burned over 20 hours and not with multiple small fires like WT7, but with an huge 20h fiery inferno and still no collapse.
Why didn't the Pentagon CRUMBLE to dust? It was "hit' by a "plane" fully loaded with jet fuel. It had fires throughout. The entire building should have turned to "talcum powder" and fallen straight down into it's own footprint! So, why are the "governments so called Laws of "Physics" different in the case of the Pentagon? Hit by a plane, jet fuel, fires,same situation as WTC Towers, it should have "disintegrated! We all know the reason the roof collapsed was from the water from the fire hoses!
molitor2005 9 months ago
Pentagon: Where is the plane? What an E-4B plane was doing flying over washington on 9/11? Show the footage of a 757 hiting the building! I dare the Pentagon to release the footage! I dare them to do so!
sacopenapa 1 year ago
As for the Pentagon Building , Any one who has a brain knows that the hole in the pentagon isn't large enough for a Boeing 757 to had made. It was a missle . Oddly , some of the witness's who said they actually saw the JET hit the pentagon had a mid-eastern accent ? I would like to have them interviewed again . Also , in the interview , we never saw their faces ? Total BS.
Hangtime96 1 year ago
I find the British coverage fair, as far as I've seen it. What I don't find fair is the line of crap being fed to us by our government. Al-Qaeda may have had something to do with 9/11, but so did the government. George Bush was in bed with Bin Laden for many years. There's paperwork to back me up. Go check out the Arbusto papers. I dare you.
mafaldacrumbwitty 3 years ago 4
a man was trown 80ft after an exsplotion at the pentagon.fuckin stupid prick.yeah write.that would kill him.fucking lien yank
nelcasino 3 years ago
This is the most damning piece of evidence of media scripting you can get.
riderpridester 3 years ago 2
No, it's enveloped in the smoke from the collapse of the Twin Towers.
theFoodEater 4 years ago
Multiple news sources have reported that building 7 was on fire in multiple areas for over 6 hours, not to mention it was hit by debris from the twin towers. But if you want to continue thinking it was explosives, feel free. O.o
Ensureqwerty 4 years ago
Yes it is true. However steel framed buildings do not collapse because of fires. Even when a steel framed building is totally burned by an all day long raging fire the structure still survives.
The Windsor Tower in Madrid burned over 20 hours and not with multiple small fires like WT7, but with an huge 20h fiery inferno and still no collapse.
masterkaztor 3 years ago 6
it could have been on fire for days and still standing because of the steel....fire do not cause building to collapse....
saxoniano 3 years ago 7
BBC teller of truth?. after this?.
jaythevictor 4 years ago 4
garbage
braineater316 4 years ago
Jane Standley won't talk about this at all. She was confronted and never said a word.
riderpridester 4 years ago 10