does A and -A (amplitudes) set the boundary for the maximum distance you can pull the mass M? Or can you pull the mass past A? and the distance that you pull the M past equilibrium, does it reflect back the same distance that you pulled it (lets say you let go from A, does it go exactly to -A?). I'm guessing that friction is ignored so it would constant go from maximum to minimum amplitude as you drew in the graph
Thx so muchfor the videos! but if you dont mind me asking, how come there is no phi in the equation? I dont understand it very well, where it comes from and how it makes the questions more complicated... if you could briefly explain it, that would be much appreciated I'm sure! ^^
Kindly upload videos on following topics. They are driving me crazy!
Standing waves, Sonometer, Newton's formula for speed of sound waves, its correction, interference, beats, Doppler Effect and remaining I'll tell you later.
I'll be really grateful if you upload those videos within a month. Gonna hv my exams at the end of March.
holy shit you're learning this in engineering?!?! I'm taking it in grade 11 physics (or physics 20) i knew the curriculum in alberta was a bit advanced but that pretty crazy, if you dont mind me asking where are you from??
we learned this in grade 11 aswell, im from ontario. the thing is, alot of first year physics does review and then expands on topics. So we still expand on this material a bit.
I am very happy to see the vidoe Intuition behind the motion of a mass on a spring after you give this
Kricardose 2 weeks ago
I Love The Video Intuition behind the motion of a mass on a spring It Can Increase My Knowledge
bebeheuy 2 weeks ago
Steady I Really Like This Video Intuition behind the motion of a mass on a spring some calculus near the end
Mjhond 2 weeks ago
sal's most common quote: "ok, let me switch colors here" :D
sebzavoico 1 month ago 4
cool ....
hacktohell 5 months ago
4 people failed physics :(
2StepMurder 5 months ago 6
I feel really good that I unbnderstood all of that . :)
Be1smaht 7 months ago
sometimes i just watch you're videos with a beer...your videos are so much more interesting than TV thanks man.
CoheedAtThe930 8 months ago
kalp sucks balls and hes gay
f00tballfever 8 months ago
its hard
SuperPramod10 1 year ago
@SuperPramod10 thats what she said
Lekiwi33 1 year ago
Please upload a video on standing waves.
NavjotGraphicDesign 1 year ago
would somebody please explain why is that the D. of p= x(t) is = to Velocity?
sleepyzz123 1 year ago
@sleepyzz123
i know this is an old post but w/e
have you taken calculus? then you know that the derivative is the slope of a tangent to any point on the graph.
if you look at the slope of a displacement(x) vs time graph(rise over run) you get displacement over time(m/s)
these units imply velocity.
6BURG9 3 months ago
1.21 gigawatts? 1.21 gigawatts? Great Scott!
MellowCruisin 1 year ago
does A and -A (amplitudes) set the boundary for the maximum distance you can pull the mass M? Or can you pull the mass past A? and the distance that you pull the M past equilibrium, does it reflect back the same distance that you pulled it (lets say you let go from A, does it go exactly to -A?). I'm guessing that friction is ignored so it would constant go from maximum to minimum amplitude as you drew in the graph
Morelloo1 1 year ago
You are the man haha, all of ur videos are sooo helpful to everything im learning at school
cshanew123 1 year ago
Comment removed
rogybra 1 year ago
Comment removed
rogybra 1 year ago
Comment removed
rogybra 1 year ago
Comment removed
rogybra 1 year ago
Comment removed
rogybra 1 year ago
Comment removed
rogybra 1 year ago
Comment removed
rogybra 1 year ago
Thx so muchfor the videos! but if you dont mind me asking, how come there is no phi in the equation? I dont understand it very well, where it comes from and how it makes the questions more complicated... if you could briefly explain it, that would be much appreciated I'm sure! ^^
wtv12345678 1 year ago
Comment removed
rogybra 1 year ago
does anyone know who this guy is?
Pilky10 1 year ago
@Pilky10 salman khan..
zackboomer 1 year ago
once you understand whats going on, Solving problems is wierd, cos u don't know what to do
rohannesburg 1 year ago
haha ''deceEElerating''
awesome video!! cheers!!
bobpower 1 year ago
i love you
20thousandlightyears 1 year ago
Nice work !!! PS: The "wave" goes after the "v" formula is explained by points; don't let time to push you.
Kywdo 1 year ago
lol doing this in high school
rinwhr 1 year ago
Just A Request....
Kindly upload videos on following topics. They are driving me crazy!
Standing waves, Sonometer, Newton's formula for speed of sound waves, its correction, interference, beats, Doppler Effect and remaining I'll tell you later.
I'll be really grateful if you upload those videos within a month. Gonna hv my exams at the end of March.
success4pak 1 year ago 5
Thank you very much! really this video is great! helped me a lot!
MidStyx 1 year ago
thank you for the informative presentation.
if only other HBS graduates were as committed to contributing society isn't of exploiting it...
ftc68 2 years ago
Can't wait to A'ce tomorrows physics exam
Thanks!!
jwall9108 2 years ago
thank you!
stewart2012 2 years ago
Your getting me through first year engineering, one video at a time!
Julian3190 2 years ago
holy shit you're learning this in engineering?!?! I'm taking it in grade 11 physics (or physics 20) i knew the curriculum in alberta was a bit advanced but that pretty crazy, if you dont mind me asking where are you from??
candikitty8 2 years ago
we learned this in grade 11 aswell, im from ontario. the thing is, alot of first year physics does review and then expands on topics. So we still expand on this material a bit.
Julian3190 2 years ago
ryerson?
johnwagu 2 years ago
McMaster
Julian3190 2 years ago
what textbook do you guys use over there? cause i know UofT and ryerson have some textbooks identicle
johnwagu 2 years ago
Physics for scientists and engineers 7th edition, Thomson. -is the first year book
Julian3190 2 years ago
Thank you, if my T.A. was half as good as you are at explaining I would not even need study.
NightSnake 2 years ago
i learnt this today in physics and semi- got it, and now i completely get it... this is the future of teaching|!!!
adamsx01x 2 years ago
This guy is awesome, many thanks, Im wondering if he even got a prize.This explains more than teacher or book. Write a request or sumthin,
muranvya 2 years ago
:D ex-Sal-arating...
CastorEnPollux 2 years ago 44
i love his voice...its calming and comforting....helps me understand easier!
kkhacc 2 years ago 53
Comment removed
lseateal 2 years ago
when an object is inertia that mean that no force is applied upon it and if there is no force , there is no acceleration.
when object in space has no force acting on it ,it does not accelerate and stay in its state of motion.
ureasonnable 2 years ago
Thumbs up, I haven't met a single person yet that has been able to explain s.h.m with that amount of clarity.
captainspiwtf 2 years ago
In 9:20 did you just put it as a partial derivative? LOL
xixzxzxyx 2 years ago
No, it's an ordinary derivative.
calvinhobbesliker2 2 years ago
my teacher says that the spontaneous movement away from point O is due to inertia...... is it inertia or momentum?????
safithegr8 3 years ago
inertia and momentum are interlinked
dannyboy12357 3 years ago 2
How in the hell does this make sense to me?, but Geometry and Trigonometry makes no sense?
xzxz619 3 years ago
But you definitely need a good solid understanding of trig fuctions to understand harmonic motions so you're probably not as bad as you think.
hits101 3 years ago 2
This video is well done, with little reliance on trigonometry and much reliance on common sense.
ezpiman 3 years ago 3