MW3 is locked at 60fps on both consoles. You can thank the dated optimized Quake 3 engine for that.
BF3 looks and runs great on the current consoles, especially considering the dated hardware compared to modern PC's. All this will be a moot point when the next Xbox comes out. You PC gamers should want new consoles, as the current gen is holding back the full potential of PC's.
Because consoles hold up rather well against PC's for a long time. Battlefield 3 on the PC doesn't make the PS3/Xbox 360 versions look like an Atari game. The biggest difference is better resolution, shadows, lighting, but the overall texture detail is not leaps and bounds better. You have to admit that what's still possible on 7 yr old hardware is rather impressive.
30fps is fine for most games. The only time you really need 60fps is in racing and sports games which the consoles handle fine. Sure, the graphics are dumb downed, but it's not fair to compare 2012 PC tech to 7 yr old console tech. The next Xbox will be night and day better than the 360.
@charvelgtrs Fine if you play them casually. Now consider there is an actual sponsored pro scene in 3D fps and other games on the consoles (no matter how weird that sounds) and that's where 30 fps is pristine fail, not mentioning the controllers.
@charvelgtrs I assumed MW3 is locked, but it has quite oldschool graphics, so I might be wrong. Let's take BF3 then as an example, but I'm positive there's actually a lot of games.
@operationturkeyshoot Are you serious? If a 7800gt can run it,two 580's in SLI will eat this game for breakfast.I have 2 580's in SLI.....I can run this maxedout without breaking a sweat with 1 GTX 580 This game is weak,the graphics are shit compared to Crysis 1
@xlr8r2010 Awesome :) Just curious if you got a copy of this program when you registered your gtx 500 series card. Im hoping I get mine but they are taking forever.
@xcloudx01 Ones who, literally, have gazillion processing cores. Oh, and I almost forgot, these systems also have twice as much RAM. And they're all linked together to create the most sophisticated and brutal HPC you've ever heard of or seen! On on top of that, everything I just mentioned is overclocked to the max (and some more), using liquid nitrogen. Just go visit Area 51, it's there... ;)
@Harpreet06 I agree 100%....they had to make the game run on shitty old console hardware.I bought 2 GTX 580's for this game,thought it was gonna be awesome....I was completely wrong.Battlefield 3 is gonna ALOT better than Crysis or Crysis 2.
@xlr8r2010 that unreal tech demo they showed was running in real time using 2 gtx 580s and 1 more for pshyx. it can definitely be done now. it will be alot more cost effective with the next gen of graphics cards. moving from 40nm to 28nm so they are estimating 75% performance increase, basically gtx 680 will be very close to 2xgtx 580s.
@briggun22 No...it won't.Crytek is a console 1st developer now.They will make more shitty games like Crysis 2 for console,the console noobs of course will eat it up...Crytek soldout the pc community.I will NEVER buy another Crytek game unless its pc ONLY!
@Xboxshqip Yea. Those visuals looks amazing. Man , i am going to download 3mk 11 and see how it runs on my six core. You should try it out too. Thanks for the link to this video.
@grock6060 um all you need a decent computer and a dx11 card, say a 580 or 6850. Don't be fool into thinking you need very high end expensive stuff to run certain apps or games.
@gromislaw18 It means that the GPU (graphics processing unit) is creating all the images frame by frame, so there is no actual video clip; a video is like buying an apple pie already made, when you render you're making the pie from scratch yourself.
MW3 is locked at 60fps on both consoles. You can thank the dated optimized Quake 3 engine for that.
BF3 looks and runs great on the current consoles, especially considering the dated hardware compared to modern PC's. All this will be a moot point when the next Xbox comes out. You PC gamers should want new consoles, as the current gen is holding back the full potential of PC's.
charvelgtrs 2 weeks ago
Antec makes land rovers now? I would buy one
Jeronwong 1 month ago
My computer laggs out trying to run this VIDEO in 1080p -.-'
Loo0Lzz 2 months ago 2
No question the next gen consoles could achieve this level of graphical detail.
charvelgtrs 3 months ago
@charvelgtrs Why even consider consoles, they will always lag behind a PC.
mystrdat 2 weeks ago
@mystrdat
Because consoles hold up rather well against PC's for a long time. Battlefield 3 on the PC doesn't make the PS3/Xbox 360 versions look like an Atari game. The biggest difference is better resolution, shadows, lighting, but the overall texture detail is not leaps and bounds better. You have to admit that what's still possible on 7 yr old hardware is rather impressive.
charvelgtrs 2 weeks ago
@charvelgtrs Depends on what you mean by "well". If the heavily dumbed down image quality and 30 fps lock is enough for you, than yes.
mystrdat 2 weeks ago
@mystrdat
30fps is fine for most games. The only time you really need 60fps is in racing and sports games which the consoles handle fine. Sure, the graphics are dumb downed, but it's not fair to compare 2012 PC tech to 7 yr old console tech. The next Xbox will be night and day better than the 360.
charvelgtrs 2 weeks ago
@charvelgtrs Fine if you play them casually. Now consider there is an actual sponsored pro scene in 3D fps and other games on the consoles (no matter how weird that sounds) and that's where 30 fps is pristine fail, not mentioning the controllers.
mystrdat 2 weeks ago
@mystrdat
What is a sponsored pro scene?
charvelgtrs 2 weeks ago
@charvelgtrs People playing the game for money, like StarCraft II for instance. In console's case, MW3.
mystrdat 2 weeks ago
@mystrdat
I'm pretty sure MW3 runs at 60fps on consoles.
charvelgtrs 2 weeks ago
@charvelgtrs I assumed MW3 is locked, but it has quite oldschool graphics, so I might be wrong. Let's take BF3 then as an example, but I'm positive there's actually a lot of games.
mystrdat 2 weeks ago
Crytek Engine 3 ? ;)
GabberVoorhees 5 months ago
We are watching ps4 graphics in that benchmark...
95928225 7 months ago
Tred this. Po' man's GPU Artifact'd to death...
TheEightBitLink 8 months ago
I now understand why so many people were disappointed with Crysis 2...
FallThroughInfinity 9 months ago
Crysis 3
fdrpyahoocom 10 months ago
Alter Schwede, das sieht in manchen Sequenzen aus wie real. O_o
centurio81 11 months ago
hope sli 580s, i7 950 and 12gb ddr3 can handle this
operationturkeyshoot 11 months ago
@operationturkeyshoot Are you serious? If a 7800gt can run it,two 580's in SLI will eat this game for breakfast.I have 2 580's in SLI.....I can run this maxedout without breaking a sweat with 1 GTX 580 This game is weak,the graphics are shit compared to Crysis 1
xlr8r2010 11 months ago
@xlr8r2010 Awesome :) Just curious if you got a copy of this program when you registered your gtx 500 series card. Im hoping I get mine but they are taking forever.
operationturkeyshoot 11 months ago
This reminds me a lot of Uncharted 2. :)
Arkaha 1 year ago
what system do you actually run these on while recording?
xcloudx01 1 year ago
@xcloudx01 Ones who, literally, have gazillion processing cores. Oh, and I almost forgot, these systems also have twice as much RAM. And they're all linked together to create the most sophisticated and brutal HPC you've ever heard of or seen! On on top of that, everything I just mentioned is overclocked to the max (and some more), using liquid nitrogen. Just go visit Area 51, it's there... ;)
aryesegal1988 1 year ago
@xcloudx01 Chuck Norris riding a unicycle.
NDogg15 1 year ago
Great quality! I hope I get to use this to make games in the future! Right now I use Unreal Engine 3, well, screw that! =D
101GamingTeam 1 year ago
This is what Crysis 3 will look like =D
briggun22 1 year ago 29
@briggun22 you mean crysis 2?
Intel1502 1 year ago
@Intel1502 No I meant Crysis 3, Crysis 2 will only look a bit better than Crysis 1.
briggun22 1 year ago
@briggun22 this is what crysis 2 should have looked like if it wasnt on consoles. this could run on the current hardware for sure.
Harpreet06 1 year ago 38
@Harpreet06 I agree 100%....they had to make the game run on shitty old console hardware.I bought 2 GTX 580's for this game,thought it was gonna be awesome....I was completely wrong.Battlefield 3 is gonna ALOT better than Crysis or Crysis 2.
xlr8r2010 11 months ago 2
@xlr8r2010 that unreal tech demo they showed was running in real time using 2 gtx 580s and 1 more for pshyx. it can definitely be done now. it will be alot more cost effective with the next gen of graphics cards. moving from 40nm to 28nm so they are estimating 75% performance increase, basically gtx 680 will be very close to 2xgtx 580s.
Harpreet06 11 months ago
@Harpreet06 Now that there are hi res textures and DX11. You are prety wrong. But right in anyways
polskpojjkeh 4 months ago
@briggun22 No...it won't.Crytek is a console 1st developer now.They will make more shitty games like Crysis 2 for console,the console noobs of course will eat it up...Crytek soldout the pc community.I will NEVER buy another Crytek game unless its pc ONLY!
xlr8r2010 11 months ago
Frostbite 2 engine OWNS Cryengine 3 ;)
xlr8r2010 11 months ago
@xlr8r2010
no cuz as of yet it isnt moddable
karambiatos 11 months ago
@briggun22 That was my thought, too! ^_^ ♥ Then it`s not anymore far away from reality. ☺
centurio81 11 months ago
@briggun22
...should have looked like
FischiPiSti 9 months ago
far cry 3 lol
Xboxshqip 1 year ago
@Xboxshqip Yea. Those visuals looks amazing. Man , i am going to download 3mk 11 and see how it runs on my six core. You should try it out too. Thanks for the link to this video.
GatewayDXSeries 1 year ago
@Xboxshqip i think you need a dx11 card, :(
GatewayDXSeries 1 year ago
New Tomb Raider game please.
StephenSuttieHouse 1 year ago
This is render frame by frame.
ddd0iii0eee0 1 year ago
i bet this needs 3 to 4 videocards to run. time to break the piggy bank..
grock6060 1 year ago
@grock6060 um all you need a decent computer and a dx11 card, say a 580 or 6850. Don't be fool into thinking you need very high end expensive stuff to run certain apps or games.
GatewayDXSeries 1 year ago
@GatewayDXSeries i hope u mean 5800series and not gtx 580 cuz it cost over 400 euro lol
MrJordiR 1 year ago
@MrJordiR 6850 150 euros and u can run all games.
nidzaPFC 1 year ago
@nidzaPFC But not maxed out ;)
katt157 8 months ago
@GatewayDXSeries even gtx580 can only get <20 fps......(in highest settings)
Ian0073040 1 year ago
@Ian0073040 well they must be using 580 2 way or something. 40 frames
GatewayDXSeries 1 year ago
Ni-i-i-ce!
HellD0t 1 year ago
is this rendered in realtime? o__O
MrVecheater 1 year ago
@MrVecheater rendered. its sort of a minigame, only that u cant do annything in it
whipemybutt 1 year ago
It's not rendered right?
ANyway we're gonna laugh at this after 10 years, you know what I mean.
DrakenPL 1 year ago
@DrakenPL it is rendered
whipemybutt 1 year ago
@whipemybutt What does it mean that it is rendered??
gromislaw18 1 year ago
@gromislaw18 data animated i think
whipemybutt 1 year ago
@gromislaw18 It means that the GPU (graphics processing unit) is creating all the images frame by frame, so there is no actual video clip; a video is like buying an apple pie already made, when you render you're making the pie from scratch yourself.
Bennyliz 1 year ago
@whipemybutt
What did they use to run that?
4x Geforce GTX999 ??
ProTofik 1 year ago
Eh bein ! Comme qui dirais : AMAZING !
Scriptofmagic 1 year ago
That's some pretty hardcore shit!
Ansakou 1 year ago