Added: 1 year ago
From: FuturemarkTV
Views: 52,039
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (62)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • MW3 is locked at 60fps on both consoles. You can thank the dated optimized Quake 3 engine for that.

    BF3 looks and runs great on the current consoles, especially considering the dated hardware compared to modern PC's. All this will be a moot point when the next Xbox comes out. You PC gamers should want new consoles, as the current gen is holding back the full potential of PC's.

  • Antec makes land rovers now? I would buy one

    

  • My computer laggs out trying to run this VIDEO in 1080p -.-'

  • No question the next gen consoles could achieve this level of graphical detail.

  • @charvelgtrs Why even consider consoles, they will always lag behind a PC.

  • @mystrdat

    Because consoles hold up rather well against PC's for a long time. Battlefield 3 on the PC doesn't make the PS3/Xbox 360 versions look like an Atari game. The biggest difference is better resolution, shadows, lighting, but the overall texture detail is not leaps and bounds better. You have to admit that what's still possible on 7 yr old hardware is rather impressive.

  • @charvelgtrs Depends on what you mean by "well". If the heavily dumbed down image quality and 30 fps lock is enough for you, than yes.

  • @mystrdat

    30fps is fine for most games. The only time you really need 60fps is in racing and sports games which the consoles handle fine. Sure, the graphics are dumb downed, but it's not fair to compare 2012 PC tech to 7 yr old console tech. The next Xbox will be night and day better than the 360.

  • @charvelgtrs Fine if you play them casually. Now consider there is an actual sponsored pro scene in 3D fps and other games on the consoles (no matter how weird that sounds) and that's where 30 fps is pristine fail, not mentioning the controllers.

  • @mystrdat

    What is a sponsored pro scene?

  • @charvelgtrs People playing the game for money, like StarCraft II for instance. In console's case, MW3.

  • @mystrdat

    I'm pretty sure MW3 runs at 60fps on consoles.

  • @charvelgtrs I assumed MW3 is locked, but it has quite oldschool graphics, so I might be wrong. Let's take BF3 then as an example, but I'm positive there's actually a lot of games.

  • Crytek Engine 3 ? ;)

  • We are watching ps4 graphics in that benchmark...

  • Tred this. Po' man's GPU Artifact'd to death...

  • I now understand why so many people were disappointed with Crysis 2...

  • Crysis 3

  • Alter Schwede, das sieht in manchen Sequenzen aus wie real. O_o

  • hope sli 580s, i7 950 and 12gb ddr3 can handle this

  • @operationturkeyshoot Are you serious? If a 7800gt can run it,two 580's in SLI will eat this game for breakfast.I have 2 580's in SLI.....I can run this maxedout without breaking a sweat with 1 GTX 580 This game is weak,the graphics are shit compared to Crysis 1

  • @xlr8r2010 Awesome :) Just curious if you got a copy of this program when you registered your gtx 500 series card. Im hoping I get mine but they are taking forever.

  • This reminds me a lot of Uncharted 2. :)

  • what system do you actually run these on while recording?

  • @xcloudx01 Ones who, literally, have gazillion processing cores. Oh, and I almost forgot, these systems also have twice as much RAM. And they're all linked together to create the most sophisticated and brutal HPC you've ever heard of or seen! On on top of that, everything I just mentioned is overclocked to the max (and some more), using liquid nitrogen. Just go visit Area 51, it's there... ;)

  • @xcloudx01 Chuck Norris riding a unicycle.

  • Great quality! I hope I get to use this to make games in the future! Right now I use Unreal Engine 3, well, screw that! =D

  • This is what Crysis 3 will look like =D

  • @briggun22 you mean crysis 2?

  • @Intel1502 No I meant Crysis 3, Crysis 2 will only look a bit better than Crysis 1.

  • @briggun22 this is what crysis 2 should have looked like if it wasnt on consoles. this could run on the current hardware for sure.

  • @Harpreet06 I agree 100%....they had to make the game run on shitty old console hardware.I bought 2 GTX 580's for this game,thought it was gonna be awesome....I was completely wrong.Battlefield 3 is gonna ALOT better than Crysis or Crysis 2.

  • @xlr8r2010 that unreal tech demo they showed was running in real time using 2 gtx 580s and 1 more for pshyx. it can definitely be done now. it will be alot more cost effective with the next gen of graphics cards. moving from 40nm to 28nm so they are estimating 75% performance increase, basically gtx 680 will be very close to 2xgtx 580s.

  • @Harpreet06 Now that there are hi res textures and DX11. You are prety wrong. But right in anyways

  • @briggun22 No...it won't.Crytek is a console 1st developer now.They will make more shitty games like Crysis 2 for console,the console noobs of course will eat it up...Crytek soldout the pc community.I will NEVER buy another Crytek game unless its pc ONLY!

  • Frostbite 2 engine OWNS Cryengine 3 ;)

  • @xlr8r2010

    no cuz as of yet it isnt moddable

  • @briggun22 That was my thought, too! ^_^ ♥ Then it`s not anymore far away from reality. ☺

  • @briggun22

    ...should have looked like

  • far cry 3 lol 

  • @Xboxshqip Yea. Those visuals looks amazing. Man , i am going to download 3mk 11 and see how it runs on my six core. You should try it out too. Thanks for the link to this video.

  • @Xboxshqip i think you need a dx11 card, :(

  • New Tomb Raider game please.

  • This is render frame by frame.

  • i bet this needs 3 to 4 videocards to run. time to break the piggy bank..

  • @grock6060 um all you need a decent computer and a dx11 card, say a 580 or 6850. Don't be fool into thinking you need very high end expensive stuff to run certain apps or games.

  • @GatewayDXSeries i hope u mean 5800series and not gtx 580 cuz it cost over 400 euro lol

  • @MrJordiR 6850 150 euros and u can run all games.

  • @nidzaPFC But not maxed out ;)

  • @GatewayDXSeries even gtx580 can only get <20 fps......(in highest settings)

  • @Ian0073040 well they must be using 580 2 way or something. 40 frames

  • Ni-i-i-ce!

  • is this rendered in realtime? o__O

  • @MrVecheater rendered. its sort of a minigame, only that u cant do annything in it

  • It's not rendered right?

    ANyway we're gonna laugh at this after 10 years, you know what I mean.

  • @DrakenPL it is rendered

  • @whipemybutt What does it mean that it is rendered??

  • @gromislaw18 data animated i think

  • @gromislaw18 It means that the GPU (graphics processing unit) is creating all the images frame by frame, so there is no actual video clip; a video is like buying an apple pie already made, when you render you're making the pie from scratch yourself.

  • @whipemybutt

    What did they use to run that?

    4x Geforce GTX999 ??

  • Eh bein ! Comme qui dirais : AMAZING !

  • That's some pretty hardcore shit!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more