Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (168)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • its not just govt organizations, private institutions like harvard, princeton columbia, and every other university that has made a comment on the subject says that gw is real and man made. If you think all of these competing private organizations that are the pinnacle of modern science are lying, I suggest you take your tinfoil hat off.

  • That's what I call OWNED!

  • oh and this has been the hottest summer in history...only a stupid fuck would take anything faux reports seriously...

  • did this jerkoff say hacked emails? how about the email hacking the faux news boss is under investigation for....these people have no shame...

  • The emails were leaked not hacked 

  • liberals at there best.

  • As soon as Mr. Al stops making billions of dollars on his opinions that global warming is a manmade problem, he would be much more believable. I could never believe anyone that has that much incentive to lie.

  • @warrenichols actually its not just al gore. every university that has made a comment on the subject accepts that gw is real including harvard, princeton, columbia, oxford and others.

    You never hear about this because deniers find it easier to smear al gore than harvard university. You should also see that there is a lot of dirty oil money that funds deniers so they have a lot more incentive to lie than al gore.

  • @bobhawks My god!!!! This Climategate shows the money that is being made off of this Man-Made Global Warming Religion!

    Thank goodness this religion is on the wane......

    Who could argue?

  • Global Warming: Can possibly increase food production and decrease heating costs. Can also possibly cause drought.

    Global Cooling: Known throughout history as the cause of famine and collapse of civilizations.

    I'd rather choose the in between path, but if I have to choose between warming and cooling, I'd choose warming.

  • I don't understand how the Fox host can claim that there were threats!? Sending a private email to a friend that you would be tempted to beat someone up is not a threat. It's not like he sent it to the guy himself saying, "im gonna beat u up." This is just media hype.

  • "Global warming pollution"? I thought carbon dioxide was a natural gas o.0

  • Climate change is real Winter, Spring Summer and Fall. after that it's all a hoax

  • at the very least its a scam for money at the worst its a excuse to set up a world government and give the government to right to slaughter anyone who doesnt serve the state

  • Pat Michaels is an oil whore.

  • @remcovanek2 Typical. No facts just adhominems directed toward adverse opinion.

  • @BelieversinThings That is not an ad hominem.

  • @BelieversinThings Oh get real. The facts are on the table. Even Patt Michaels admits on TV he is paid by the oil companies. Go read James Hoggan book The Climate Cover-up and get informed, but that is probably to much to ask. It is better to stay in your confort zone together will all the other pseudo-skeptics....

  • @remcovanek2 The facts are on the table! There are thousands of Emails where Members of the IPCC have worked together to hide evidence that's contrary to their agenda. You want to ignore that evidence and concentrate on character assault of the messenger. YOU should get real!

  • @BelieversinThings Six independent inquiries proof you wrong. Not one scientist was found quilty. That is a fact!!!!

    Climategate only proofs that scientist are human beings too.... Duh. And yes, an error is possible in a report with thousands pages. Not good, but the error has been admitted and corrected! That is the honest procedure. I do not find that on the sides of "skeptics". Only spin... from FOX news, Michaels etc. Check potholer54 lol

  • @remcovanek2 They didn't do anything criminal, but those Emails discredit them as objective scientists. You religiously support these scumbags, because you're inability to think for yourself makes it necessary for you to have blind faith in your leaders like any other religious zealot. You and people like you are dupes.

  • @BelieversinThings You are deaf or brainless...

  • @remcovanek2 Fortunately steadfast idiots like you are a small minority, and the rest of us see that these "impartial" scientists have a lot to lose if they're wrong, so they fight tooth and nail to silence opposition instead of looking for the truth. You're very naive. Whether you accept it or not, the rest of the country see these guys as the frauds they are, and hopefully they wont be able to cripple the economy with more pointless taxes and legislation..

  • @BelieversinThings

    Yep. Brainless.... Keep on echoing FRAUD FRAD FRAUD!!! Minor detail...you do not have ANY independent inquiry to substantiate your foolish opion... Only your personal opinion which is ... truely childish.

  • @remcovanek2 So glad these disgusting e-mails from individuals (I'd hardly call them, "scientists") were exposed so that we can all see the hypocrisy of the money being made by the man-made global warming wing-nuts!!

    No independent inquiries (all driven by the colleagues of these guys).

    Wow (what are they hiding?)

  • @remcovanek2 I don't need an independent inquiry. It's right there in the Emails moron. It's in front of your stupid religiously liberal face and you ignore it because being wrong is inconcievable to you. One day you'll wake up and feel like an idiot for thinking the way you do now.

  • @BelieversinThings wow. you are really frustrated.... Must be the facts.

    There is no serious scientific misconduct in the emails. But you rather belief the FOX propaganda. Internet gave a voice to the voiceless, but not a brain to the brainless...

  • @remcovanek2 There are communications between people clearly trying to keep information under wraps from their opposition. That's politically savvy, but they're clearly pushing an agenda instead of looking for the facts which is completely unscientific.. The republicans can go fuck themselves, but that doesn't mean I have to blindly follow the liberal religion. You're a sucker.

  • @BelieversinThings Don't fuck the republicans man, there all we got left.

    It's sad that mankind is drunk on it's own power with the need to control us, it's sickening.

  • Leave science to the scientists. If every single Climatologist in the country agrees that the climate is changing, then it's probably fucking changing.

  • @bobhawks lmfao in all the pseudoscience test these ass clowns did they failed to take the sun in affect. and Nobel Prize-winning they will give one of them to anyone I.E. barack obama. to end if george bush seys it is true. then you know it's a bunch of BS, like his 8 years as president

  • Global Warming is a scam. CO2 is not pollution. However, mercury released from coal burning is a pollutant. Fertilizer run off into the waters is pollution. Plastic crap in the waterways and oceans is pollution. We need to change the focus from CO2 to pollution mitigation. In this way, we would find ourselves living in a cleaner world having spent less money acheiving this than worrying about CO2. Resist the AGW religion with the Al Goreleone crime syndicate tring to steal your money.

  • Republicans are terrorists and "climategate" proves it. They are evil and most definitely the most sinister of enemies not just of America but of the entire World.

  • 6:46 the guest says "Your not entitled to your own facts' what the heck? He just exposed the mind set of the global warming advocates on national TV.

  • It's funny how all the sheep bought into this. We shouldnt be concerned with fake global warming when our unemployment rate is higher than 10%.

  • @Fishstix9000 Any one who thinks global warming is "fake" is seriously shortsighted at best but most likely is a hateful stupid retarded dumbass republican bent on the destruction of the world. Just because bush destroyed the economy we shouldn't consider how further bad judgement is destroying the world? Nice try, rove puppet!

  • I wonder if they will correct themselves on air when they find out a few emails later a reply was sent explaining the solar cycle and that the earth was cooling due to the solar min. Some conspiracy. Still that was the hottest decade on record since recording started.

  • Send this to ur facebook, myspace and emails, people need to know how the "authorities" on such matters are trying to manipulate and control us!!!!!! Lord knows the liberal news channels wont publish any of this.

  • weird how the world goes from global cooling in the 1970s to getting rid of the use of CFC's to making poverty history and now to global warming, hah when u think about it make poverty history lasted for 2 years? AND i can bet you that as global warming becomes more debated, some other issue will arise lets say "stop the production of shoes" bad example I know, the people who supported global warming will ignore it and concentrate on this issue as if global warming was never debated

  • On the other hand, you have an ongoing public debate - not about how to respond, but about whether we should bother, about whether climate change is even a scientific certainty. While those who stand in denial of climate change have failed in the last 15 years to produce a single, peer-reviewed scientific journal article that challenges the theory and evidence of human-induced climate change, mainstream media was, until very recently, covering the story.

  • bobhawks - There were several ICCP members who quit and resigned because their original report stated that there was no evidence of manmade Global Warming. One guy named Ben Santer went and deleted those sections and added:

    -climate change is real

    -it is caused by human activity

    -it is threatening the planet in ways we can only begin to imagine

    he even admitted on TV!! Gee Whiz guys - how many times does your Government get to lie to you before you quit believing them.

  • Every defense of AGW is a simple appeal to authority. Because "X" commission says that AGW exists then everyone has to accept that it exists. "unequivacally"

  • haha...the ol worn out "polar bear swimming around" loop doesn't effect sympathy anymore does it ? Fox is running it now to warn you that at any moment, a global warming queer is going to be on your TV set...for you to laugh at !

  • ive been waiting for this to happen for a while now.. and im glad.  Makes me chuckle a bit to see the fundies trying to get evolution (which they dont understand) thrown out with this clever con job. too bad that evolution is well documented and has never been falsified.. for them.

  • they were out for 5 weeks befor it was known phil jones was on a few days befor and said they had a cyber attack and that they are genuine!

    they are genuine!

  • Wiese is about idiot, it doesn't matter now how the emails got out, they are out! The skewed data is not reliable and he keeps referring to skewed sources! Phil Jones already admitted he wrote the ones that had his name on them! He is a Al Gore Whore!

  • That Zionist was pushed into the corner, wow it unbelievable that even fox news start talking.

  • Never stops amazing me at how calm and collected we "skeptics" are at getting our thoughts and views across on the matter, yet the totally clueless people and so called "scientists" get all abusive and resort to petty name calling when they are called out on what they spit out and or caught with their pants down. Typical bully like behaviour. Almost funny, really.

  • I would have to say those emails are genuine. It'd be far too difficult to fake them noting specific meetings and names, thousands of times.

    The real threat is this: Real science and real facts can be distorted and hidden by posers being paid to do so. It's almost what religion did in the dark ages.

    Help me Obi-Wan Kenobi.. you're my only hope.

  • Carbon tax here we come . The earth has warmed and cooled a lot of times in the past! and there is evidene. The new bad guy is us not the terrorist, thats how they will unite us just like they did on 911 . And who no's whats next.

  • I'm glade to see that these scientist have been EXPOSED by their OWN WORDS.

  • That guy's argument that global warming is a fact is false when he uses examples that reservoirs are drying up or wild fires in California. The reservoirs are drying up because of growth, and wild fires are mostly induced by arsonists or lightning strikes,etc.

  • This initial breach makes me so happy! :)

    It set off a chain reaction that saved Australia from that scam-of-a-tax hell!!!

    But it was clear that the momentum was in out favor anyways...but this! This was the final nail in the coffin of the nwo carbon taxing scam! YES!

  • De-va-stat-ing-ly gooooooood!!!

    NWO is going down!!

  • This fox guest-host is humanities hero!

    This was the first breach into the climategate scam on mainstream media!

    And the breach was devasting!!!

    Copenhagen is a bust you nwo fucks! God that felt good to type. mmmmmm yeh

  • The bigger the lie put of out, the more believers, straight out of the Hitler book of total control.

    Another NWO order scam.

    Wake up people.

    Taxing the richer countries and joining them with the poorer

    ones for total domination.

    You know what United Nations means don't you?

  • wow a reporter on fox news i actualy respect

    look at buddy just panic to shit

  • "Reservoirs are now empty" in the Southwest. Does everyone understand that most of the Southwest is desert and that there has been extreme migration of Californian's and other to the Southwest over the last decade. They majority of them have swimming pools and therefore great waste.

  • "Reservoirs are now empty" therefore catastrophic GW exists. No the the 20th century was unusually wet in the western USA. It is now returning to a naturally drier condition.

  • hahahaha, this is too funny. I love when these global warming nuts try to throw in a few last punches before they hit the floor.

  • that's how s news reporter should be. that four eyed shill is dying kicking and screaming the tide has turned and they should all be thrown in jail. including Al Gore

  • fuck you four eyes. lying sack of shit

  • we must stop copinhagon ...... this is a fucking lie .freedom vs tyranny.

  • I find it rather shady that the reps for climate change denial are from the Competitive Enterprise Institute and CATO instead of actual, publishing scientists. So you have ideological hacks arguing with ACTUAL scientists--anyone spot the problem here? One side is using the PR tactics of F.U.D. and the other is using scientific methods and data. I'd deny FOI requests too if I was forced to deal with this crap.

  • LMAO! owned!

  • This is a joke. One fudged study does not legitimize throwing out the mountains of evidence for climate change or ignorantly continuing to pollute like crazy for "economic benefit".

  • Interesting.

    So, even though this "One Fudged Study" has laid bare the fact that these "scientists" have been cherry picking data to achieve a desired outcome FOR DECADES, then feeding that outcome to every like minded "scientist" in the world thus corrupting EVERY computer climate model on Earth with false data, which is then used as an excuse to curtail Freedom, and you talk about Jokes?

    The entire "Mountain of Evidence" is the Joke. It never existed.

  • ProfMike789 No but when you see a CONSPIRACY to defraud the American people to paying Carbon taxes and buying Carbon credits to a company that Al Gore is partnered in I think thats called Racketeering.

    AND ITS NOT ONE FUDGED STUDY -- IT A DECADE LONG FUDGED STUDY - FOR DATA THEY NOW REFUSE TO SHOW THE PUBIC ---THAT WE PAID FOR! THATS CALLED GRANT FRAUD.

  • Ah, yes, the excellent "Caps Lock and Poor Grammar" argument.

  • questioning one's grammar skills and use of keyboard is the very most worstest type of argument. grow up kid.

    And that "scientist" trying to defend the mainstream opinion is like someone trying to defend a religion (i have nothing against religions, im an agnostic). What he says does not answer the questions made by the tv person, he just keeps saying allround shit about global warming. Like a muslim saying BUT IT SAYS SO IN THE KORAN. Yeah..

  • @clint525fuller Take off your tin foil hat douche bag. O No!! scientists arn't perfect! What they can.. make mistakes, they have to update their data when new discoveries are made? Grow up! No CONSPIRACY just embarrassing reporting.

  • @clint525fuller

    TALKING IN CAPS MAKES MY ARGUMENT SOUND SUPER CEREAL.

    Fact of the matter is, the global temperature is going up, on average. The data is no being hidden, you just need to go look at it. Now, am I advocating that human pollution is the sole cause? No. However, major climate change always works as a tipping scale. If we act as a catalyst, and increase the global temperate by even 1 more degree, the amount of ice that melts can cause a natural chain reaction of temperature increase

  • @atheistchaos

    I know it's an old post, but you win on three counts for your YouTube post here.

    1. Capital letter notation is brilliant.

    2. You understand the issue being discussed here.

    3. Any atheist wins with me.

    Best to you.

     Oh, and I liked the Perfect Universe clip on your site.

  • @atheistchaos You honestly think we as humans can act as a "catalyst" in something so massively and globally large? The earth's orbit is now nearly circular meaning we are closest to the sun that we've pretty much ever been within the past century... not only that.. but the sun's rays and the sun itself is responsible for over 98% of the earth's actual heating and heating cycles.. The climate is changing due to its natural free will, I don't know what delusional world you live in... :\

  • @Nightsblood192

    Considering there are 6 billion people on this planet, and that number is growing, yes, I do think we can act as a catalyst. You must not understand what a catalyst is though for you to make such a retarded statement. In any case, to act as if 6 billion people polluting on a constant basis across the entire world doesn't negatively affect it, you would be the deluded one.

  • @atheistchaos News flash, don't act like a know it all because you end up coming off as an ignoramus. Admitting what you don't know brings out more facts than you think... why is it that after the post war boom temperatures dropped as co2 rose? Why is it that temperatures not only in the medieval period.. but also since ancient Babylon, temperatures have soared over what they currently are for almost 3 thousand years...

  • @Nightsblood192

    Temperature did not drop on a global average. I know you're a moron, so you don't understand the concept of global average, as in, while temperature has gone down in certain regions due simply to the way nature works, doesn't mean that temperature overall, across the globe, has gone down. It's quite the opposite actually, and this data is not hidden from the public, go look at it for yourself.

    As for temperatures being high in the past, natural causes.

  • @atheistchaos Not only that, but to think ALL 6 billion people are polluting is a fallacy in itself. The whole scare on MM global warming has halted actual progression in places such as Africa and thus prevents them from even being included in any statistic you bring up.. You think the amount of co2 in the air is making a difference? Co2 has never been responsible for climatic change... To think yourself so pompous as to know exactly what cycles the earth undergoes makes you look well.. stupid

  • @Nightsblood192

    The thing you fail to understand is that we are acting as a catalyst that causes natural increases in temperature. I'm sorry you still can't grasp the concept of what a catalyst is, perhaps you go look it up.

    Outside of ancient tribes in africa, we all contribute to global pollution in one way or another.

    Also, to assume that you know for a fact that co2 has no affect on the temperature of the earth while you obviously aren't a climatologist makes you look retarded.

  • @atheistchaos Yes I do agree that we should take better care of our earth, clean our water and stop the local pollution, but this local problem has nothing on a global scale and no piece of data even links us to MM global warming so I don't know how you can claim to know all this... lets not consider how most IPCC "authors" are not scientists at all, and those that disagree and quit were put on the Annual Reports anyway... Not to mention the whole data alteration scandal..

  • @Nightsblood192

    Yes, and us using cars has nothing to do with the declining rates of oil. Derpaderp.

    Just because you claim something doesn't make it true, back it up with a non-conspiracy theory article and I'll believe you.

    The data alteration scandal was a hoax that is brilliantly debunked by potholer54, you can go watch his video on his channel.

  • @atheistchaos You're clearly one of those people who thinks, because you're an atheist, probably liberal, active in world "problems" you think you're smarter than everyone who has a different opinion. Well sir I attacked no body, but I asked you to use common sense instead of assumption. You're very arrogant (not the good kind) :\ and that shows itself worse than ignorance sometimes, I highly suggest you back up your theories with data and stop being a typical atheist forcing your opinions on

  • @Nightsblood192

    You're one of those people that generalizes people based off their beliefs. I'm actually independent, but that's beside the point. It's not that you have a different opinion, it's just your opinion is opposing a massive body of scientific study that says you're wrong.

    You're pretty arrogant to tell me to use common sense then lump me together in a stereotype you hold for atheist and liberals, and tell me I'm the assumptive one when you assume I'm liberal :)

    Have a nice day.

  • @atheistchaos other people.

  • @Nightsblood192

    I also don't force my opinions on other people, which is another assumption you've arrogantly made of me. If you think that me telling you you're wrong about global warming is an opinion, well then, like I said, you truly are a delusional man.

  • @atheistchaos Yes yes.. going "derpderp" is going to make ME look like a retard while it's you whose in the position to scientifically defend yourself bud.. I don't care what your beliefs are, fact is at least I take modern data from ALL sources and conclude that even in most global warming co2 studies.. rising co2 levels have no effect on temp and as a result we have concluded that the rise in solar activity has had its drastic effects over the course of the 20th and 21st centuries...

  • @Nightsblood192

    I don't need to defend myself, this is an argument on the internet, forgive me if I'm not up in arms about proving that global warming is real. I've already stated my case, if you, or anyone else has interest in the subject, do the research and come to your own conclusion. I personally would again point you to potholer54 rather than link a bunch of references anyway.

  • @atheistchaos When you take TSI or solar intensity data it properly correlates with temperature than any factor you put in, and as for your IPCC, why is it that when scientists quit because they do not agree with a certain consensus, they are still put on the annual report? It's ridiculous, and the fact that you adamantly think you're right without backing up anything data wise is really just making YOU look stupid :\ I'm not personally doing anything, you're doing all this to yourself man..

  • @atheistchaos As far as I'm concerned I take data from all sources, and still something isn't right, I'm sure even you could put all that brain power to work and figure that out for yourself. The IPCC refuses to show us said data.. fine so I'll get it from other sources, Just look up TSI data, co2 temperature graphs... you'll see that many many times throughout history co2 has not effected temperature... it's done the opposite. We as humans have had our effects BUT to assume

  • @atheistchaos that we can "change" the earth's climate is a very very funny thing to say. You do understand that to undergo something like that, it would take scientific research beyond that of which we have and much more time than even industrialization has been around :\ I'm sure you can agree with me on this... Taking a look at data I stand both corrected and ashamed at both MM GW and its skeptics... It's a very deep concept and once you realize that no one is particularly "right" on this

  • @Nightsblood192

    I again point to you that if anything, humans act as a catalyst. The planet is on a scale, it ranges from frozen ice age to barren desert, and these temperature differences are natural. This is why we can have such a large effect, because all we have to do is push the natural chain of events into play and the earth will naturally heat or cool depending on what happens. That's how it is, it's not my little theory, all we have to do is increase the temperature a slight bit more.

  • @atheistchaos and that you should most likely use your common sense thereafter.. because when modern sources fail you, and you're denied your right to climate data from one of the biggest climate institutions in the world.. you have to do it all yourself and when you do that you'll see what I'm talking about... I'm not talking about doing your own research I'm talking about gathering all the hard data you can... Everything has an explanation such as the ice caps/glaciers, temps etc...

  • @atheistchaos Don't bring up BS like declining oil ok? If you think we're acting as a catalyst then give me some data, until then it's a theory of yours and you can't claim anyone is right or wrong (even yourself) until you've done your homework on it as well. I've done mine, it's more than I can say for you :\ because you all make bold claims that we're doing such harm and yadda yadda and have never even looked at a piece of data relating to this. Do your research then come back to me <3

  • @clint525fuller Learn the facts. Al Gore doesn't profit from his partnership in that company and the data is still conclusive that AGW is real. The tree ring data diverged from all the other sources of data, so that is why the tree ring data was not used.

  • @clint525fuller Perhaps when you scream harder it becomes true what you say? Or just witchhunt the scientist who are responsible for unwanted information???

  • @clint525fuller Yeah it's a fudged study that 97% of climatologists agree with-- 97% of people who have access to the relevant data and spend their lives engaged in the activity of verifying or denying it. Check the funding of those who left, and fact check the subtle mistakes that populate their own work.

  • @ProfMike789 The evidence shows that rises in the CO2 level have followed rises temperature. They didn't cause them. These guys have been dancing around the facts and making fools of people who sincerely care about the environment.

  • @ProfMike789 The point is , like the man here says, that on private they say "its travesty we cannot fit the data" but to public they do not say it. To public they speak positively about warming and not about these problems.

  • Everyone that bought a ticket to Algores Inconvenient Lie movie should be sending Al baby a demand for a full refund, plus interest.

  • This guest guy was an idiot! He couldn't answer the questions! He just kept spouting the "talking pionts he was given! Didn't even make sense! He was quoting conclusions angecy had reached based on faulty information.  It is the faulty information, the foundation for these agencies statements that is now about to bring the whole thing tumbling down!

  • And Dan Weiss sounds remarkably like the desperate little weasel he is, doesn't he? CAP CrAP at it's finest.

  • And here's the question Varney didn't ask ' "Why was information deleted and dumped after an FOIA request, knowing that doing so was a criminal offense?"

  • Acorn uses intimidation tactics and threats against voters, the labor unions use intimidation tactics against workers and now junk scientists are using intimidation and threats. What's next? obama could cede U.S. sovereignty to the UN if he signs a treaty in Coppenhagen, which takes precedence over our constitution. But those kinds of treaties are not what our founding fathers meant, which was and is treaties of peace and justice. Obama would cede US sovereignty and is why he is splurging our $,

  • MinnesotaNorthStar, please don't toss Evolution into the same basket as the climate change scare. One is a solid theory on our origins backed up by evidence and the other is an unproven hypothesis, it defeats your entire argument to go there.

  • Actually, evolution is not as solid as many would like to think. Similar tactics of suppression as evidenced in this email scandal can be found in abundance among honest scientists who have legitimate questions to ask about evolution. Read "Forbidden Archeology" by Cremo and Thompson for a whole lot more insight on this matter.

  • Thank you. I'll look it up.

  • There is no evidence of evolution. Science can only study things already in existence. It cannot study and report what has not come into existence. Evo fails.

  • Yes. There is evidence for evolution. Viruses and bacterium for example have life cycles much faster than our own, and their mutations are easily identified and tracked.

  • And that proves evo, how? Evo scientists only repeat data they were taught. They are taught to remember data, rather than study objectively. There is no way possible for something to come from nothing except that an intelligent being created everything for which everything has a purpose. Former evo scientists, when they did independent studies, concluded that they had been duped and that evo was scientifically impossible. Google former evolutionists.

  • Because it provides proof that organisms mutate and change into new ones. Your proof is a book w/ unknown authors and wonderful stories of a homeless jews that could raise people from the dead. Can you prove that it is possible to raise people from the dead? Can you prove that splitting a fish in half will produce an entirely new one? Can you prove anything? of course not. We have evidence and you do not, hence the term "faith" versus "knowledge".

  • Again, science cannot determine how something came into existence before existence. Faith in biblical scripture is strengthened when people experience the relationship with God, whose Spirit He places in those who repent and serve Him. Faith becomes first-hand knowledge of His presence. The bible has scientific factors that have been proven. How would Moses know, who wrote the first few books, that we have the same elements in us and animals as the dirt he said we came from?

  • Ok well then it seems to me that you do not understand evolution. Evolution, at least as Darwin stated it, explains how the mechanisms of natural selection and reproductive success effect extant(currently living) organisms. Evolution is not a general theory of the universe nor a creation theory. Your trying to disprove evolution on a claim that the theory never presents. Go read the origin of the species and come back... i swear to you the devil did not write it:)

  • Evo scientists do not take into consideration that mankind and animals were created whole, that the descendents of Adam and Eve, which is everyone born on earth, are all related, so of course, we share the same bios as they. God created nature to be autonomous, so as people traveled, their bodies changed to adapt to their climates and environments, thus, the different races. It was their bodies' way of surviving, but the first 2 people were made whole, not through any slow process.

  • @denalaurens Of course evolutionary biologists don't take that into consideration: Because it's wrong.

  • Show me how it's wrong. Evo is scientifically impossible.

  • @denalaurens Because Corn exists, ~QED. Evolution is an observable fact and only people with an ideological framework, in which they must deny reality if it conflicts with their beliefs, deny it.

  • Which aspects of the bible are scientifically proven? Ill admit that some of the stories are likely based on actual near eastern history... But then again so are alot of fables and epics. I take it you don't tale the illyad 100% literally?

  • Like I said, there was no way that Moses would have known that we would have the same elements in us as the dirt he wrote we were made from, as was dictated to him by God. Read Genesis. He created man out of the dirt. Also, scientists say that when they measured and calculated earlier times from today's data, they discovered that the earth had rotated back out of it's normal cycle. The bible states that God turned the earth backward 90 degrees for Zachariah. Greek poetry is irrelevant.

  • there is evidence of adaptation. there is no science anywhere that can account for an increase in information which would be necessary for evolution. darwins hypothesis depended on simple life being simple. it is highly complex. amino acids necessary for life are not produced anywhere in nature other than in already living organisms. mutations or random changes in highly complex information systems do not ever produce greater complexity. evolution is a joke. a bad joke.

  • evolution is not solid as it is based on an incorrect hypothesis. there is no accounting for information systems, reproductive systems, cardiovascular systems, optical systems, immunological systems. evolution is pathetically silent about how such systems could have come about by accident. the company line is, "They just did."

  • Evolution has been pushed into our lives the same way as the bogus climate change has. Science that is based on lies and propaganda. They fire people who do not help there cause and suppress anyone who has any scientific evidence that goes against them. This crap has been going on for a long time and this is just the latest. Everyone needs to be pissed off and demand justice.

  • international panel on climate change IPCC unfortunately it is intergovernmental panel on climate change, WHAT A FAIL hahaha, I guess international government (one world) is the real aim anyways ha, this guy is a mindless puppet

  • 'Hide the decline' is referring to substituting real temps into a climate modeling formula using data made from proxy or reconstructed data. Comparing apples and oranges to hide the declining temps.

    One HAS to use the same method to validate the data analysis and modeling results when comparing old vs newer temps. IF you replace old method for new method (only 1960 onward) for only some of the data, it provided the skewed the results in favor of 'warming' that they wanted.

  • JUNK SCIENCE

  • MSNBC, CBS, ABC ...... bias news agencies, or else simply incompetent. Nevertheless, its quite pathetic that they don't simply broadcast the truth. (First ACORN, and now this...)

    Thank goodness general public is awakening to their antics, demonstrated by their sad ratings. FOX isn't afraid to report the truth, thank God.

  • Global Warming. Yeah right. Its Global Cooling. All these guys are nuts and Al can suck some dick.

  • That global warming scientist was in total panic lmao , and to use george bush as his idol is disgusting , that really shows how stupid he is !

  • He thought if he mentioned George Bush the republicans would think he was more credible. lol

  • Dan Wiess is a spaz. He uses Bush's statment on global warming as authoritative. Bet he doesn't uses Bush's statments on Iraq as author. Pat Michaels says that the people who wrote the emails are thisn skinned. Dan Wiess proves it with his tirade that doesn't address the issue being discussed.

  • This is so funny. Look what stations and who is reporting this and you can see the panic and the last grasps at trying to stay in control. Now it's just comedy. Or better yet a b rated movie script.

    LOL! Like anyone would believe a word fox news says anymore. LOL!

  • @paidglennbecktroll

    LOL the Climate Hoax exposed.

    Your right about Fox, but its the same for the rest as well. CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBC, etc... All American mass media is a joke not just Fox.

  • paidglennbecktroll don't be lefty. Fox news did not break this story. The Associated Press broke this story thanks to the White Hat Hackers who uncovered it. This global warming bullshit needs to stop. The hell if I am going to let them tax me every mile I drive or every breath I take. You better wake up to reality and stop letting your political beliefs get the best of you. Prison is where all politicians belong and that goes for all the so called scientists who follow as well.

  • that was a hilarious interview!

    who is this anchor?? he makes you want to beat the shit out of him lol

  • I have the emails for dwnload theruthlesstruth com wordpress the-ruthless-truth-blog-hosts-­the-global-warming-scam-emails

  • what a fucking worm trying to assert the ideal above the facts.

  • Nice to see my Uni making headlines, I just wonder why its only Fox that runs with this crap. I'd love to take a look at their e-mails.

  • Keep blogging folks, raising questions about this scientific scam is up to us because the media sure isn't doing its job. The government paid institutions have been working to prove a pre-ordained hypothesis, and their massive funding depended on coming up with answers that fitted. The leaked emails show us that the "science" must now be audited from outside the climate change industry before the world commits to anything. It's time for the small guys to stand up!

  • Its not that green companies are bad. I have a solar power franchise that is constantly crushed by govt red tape. Did you know that the oil companies, Shell, BP and GE who fight oil wars dominate the PV industry and work nonstop to stop innovation and progress. They bought up the industry and raised the barrier to entry making it almost impossible to succeed. GE bought the rights to a PV panel that produced 4000W compared to their 200W panels and took them off the market. Govt is just as bad.

  • Thumbs up for Russia. Im glad we have the internet, it brings the world together.

  • Another Bush/Obama Government plot to raise taxes and new world order scams

    America is in a Governmental Obamanation

    HR 1207 End the FED and America will become a safer place our troops will be able to find their own way home. Impeach the selected by the FED

  • Nice to see a zionist puppet being slammed.

  • Most people all don't realize that the e-mails aren't only from people at the CRU, they are from climate scientists all over the place.

  • "Pity that Copenhagen meeting didn't get off the ground...Yeah, and it won't achieve a thing. Nothing at all, and you know it. It's a bust!"

    LMFAO!

  • i was waiting for Dan Weiss to state that disagreeing with man made global warming was antisemitic.

  • That made me LOL

  • That Weiss is a fucking tool. Someone needs to take him out.

  • hes not a fucking because a tool is a fucking handy thing i.e a hammer that could be used on the head of this ugly tit. anyway waych the markets over the next week or 2 cause all the smart dicks with their cash tied up in green companies are gonna bail ha ha ha ha . Ya fuckin beauty

    beano the mad scotsman

  • Yup yup time to start shorting stock haha!

  • Looked like he was about to take himself out with a heart attack. ;p

  • Almost every single person on the TV that promotes global warming, stands to profit from it. From the scientists who "fix" data, to the company that will get the taxpayer money, to the politician that is heavily invested in said companies. This is another transfer of wealth from the middle classes to the oligarchs...just like the bank bailouts were.

  • "Well, there goes your credibility"

    HAHAHAHA, I almost pissed my pants. 9:03

  • Who is this clown Dan Weiss? He's taken apart. Lol. This made my bad day good :)

  • Mr Dan Weiss should be going to jail

  • Global warming ... what a scam. Saint Al Gore must be shitting his pants now, he's gonna loose all those millions he's making off of those lies!

  • He cites a dozen studies that prove AGW that are all based on data that these emails prove were faked!!!!

  • I wonder if the "temperatures rising" he's talking about were gathered by the CRU?

    We're not buying what your're selling dude. I never knew that the world of science was such a violent career choice. Now I know what those pocket protectors are really for.

  • The emails have been confirmed as authntice by the CRU in Anglia, they confirmed they have been hacked..

    Why would they calling the Police if they are not real?

  • Liberal tactic in action, attack the method the email was acquired. Quote BUSH? Change the topic and parrot global warming is a fact, so why question it? Yes, many of the authors have confirmed they are valid emails. Is this the best liar the left can prop up? I think I could almost see tears behind his goggles.

  • No, this is not a liberal conservative issue. It is neither Democrat nor Republican. This is about truth versus lies, about freedom versus tyranny. Don't get caught up in the false right versus left paradigm.

  • This IS about Liberal and Conservative.

    Who has been pushing this AGW garbage for 40 years? The Left. They've been attacking our Freedoms and steadily growing government for nearly 100 years.

    Fact is, if you take this away from a Left/Right issue, you're letting all of the folks out there that blindly followed the AGW mantra simply because all of their lefty friends did, off the hook. They need to be shown in Technicolor that what, and who, they have been lead to believe is a lie. And Why.

  • @ShadenGheist

    If you can concede that most Republicans are neither republican nor conservative, then I can agree that it IS a liberal/conservative issue.  After all, when it comes to growing the government or taking our freedoms away the Republican leadership has played a significant role.

    "Conservative", "Republican", "right/left" - these are all terms that have been polluted and confused. It is simpler to look at it as freedom vs tyranny. No?

  • Oh, most definitely. There are Repubs in name only.

    That's why we need the Libtard / Conservative labels. So they can be applied to those that use the Party as a shield.

    Bush was no Conservative. He was a Republican, but held his fathers, and the Repub Elite's liberal views on many things.

    Obama is no Moderate. He also holds his fathers views. He hates America, and everything it stands for.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more