Alex is such a dufus. He says Putin was Yeltsin's vice-president which is not true, He says Putin was not going to win if not for war in Chechnya, but that is bull shit also. Alex you are ignorant about Russia just like 99% of Americans, so stfu and listen to someone who has some understanding of Russian politics like Tarpley and don't repeat ridiculous claims after western msm like a parrot. you are discrediting yourself.
Alex Jones: 'I know that Russian Inteligence services have staged false flags before'
first of all this so general: 'false flags' could mean any deceptive operation and 'before'... what the hell does that mean before. Russia has been around for a thousand years so that is a long time for before. Other than vague claims Alex should provide EVIDENCE of any accusations. I know in the Russia is Evil world no evidence is necessary but to me Alex's credibility is shot when pulls something like this.
Alex Jones: 'I know that Russian Inteligence services have staged false flags before'
first of all this so general: 'false flags' could mean any deceptive operation and 'before'... what the hell does that mean before. Russia has been around for a thousand years so that is a long time for before. Other than vague claims Alex should provide EVIDENCE of any accusations. I know in the Russia is Evil world no evidence is necessary but to me Alex's credibility is shot when pulls something like this.
It does not matter what Jones means when he claims that Russian Intelligence staged false flags. Unless he provides evidence for his accusations, he is just as bad as the rest of the Russia hating crowd. I can say the same thing about anyone including Alex himself that 'I know Alex Jones staged false flags before' and I support his actions because I think he is a good guy and had to do it for good reason. Would you call me an Alex supporter for this?
Look, I don't think Alex is one of the numerous Russia haters, but I don't think he is pro-Russia either. I think he is pro-US actually. I think Alex is a good guy, but talks way more than he knows and his 'everything I say is right' attitude and loud rants turn me off and kill his credibility for me.
Yes, some of his mannerisms bug me as well. I like Webster Tarpley better. But I think both are real nationalists, in the sense that they not only want the US to be strong and independent, but that they want all nations to be as strong and independent as possible.
Too often I find Alex ranting about things he is not knowledgeable on.
FYI,
1. There is no position of vice-president in Russia and Putin was never a vice-president.
2. Putin did not launch a war in Chechnia after 99 Moscow apartment bombings. A month before the bombings Chechen militants invaded neghbouring Dagestan to try and take it over. That is what led to second Chechen war.
3. The false flag claims (FSB did it) are spread by people connected to Berezovski
Bombing is NOT in interest of Medvedev & specially NOT in interest of Putin whose image is built on bringing SECURITY in Russia
And specially NOT in Russian interest be cause of coming OLYMPIC GAMES they have ALL interests to keep that region calm be cause OLYMPIC GAMES will be CLOSE to that problematic region! Bombing attacks happen every year in Russia so making ONE false flag in the long series just doesn't make sense!
Do your research 1st Alex Jones be cause you are INCOMPETENT!
Sure, Tarpley categorical denies the existence of any kind of a business cycle. This is absurd.
Tarpley's analysis of complex political events is also what I care about, not his ideas for solutions (which are naive and mute).
I do not care about whether or not Tarpley likes Ron Paul. He is not perfect either, but I still am sending money to his son Rand Paul who has a good shot to win a seat in the US Senate.
I see what you mean, but to get a clear picture of how Tarpley thinks, without mikes and sponsors one would need to spend a few months with him at his place with alot of wiskey or vodka. lol Which I would love to do.
Let's not turn this into a Tarpley bashing session.
I just want to point out that he has some biases:
(1) against City of London
(2) works for Russia Today (Putin) at the moment.
Tarpley's argument here that these attacks somehow hurt Putin is weak. In fact, he doesn't really have one. He says "maybe this hurt's Putin in Kremlin circles".
Then Tarpley totally ignores that fact that Putin and the FSB have done this before.
This full-drive conspiracy analysis a la Mr. Jones is too simplistic and populist, to be a faithful representation of complex reality. There are always different ways to see patterns in events. So it becomes too factional.
Just to say next time there is something ugly by way of attacks in the West, that Russia couldn't be possibly involved since it itself suffers from terrorism?
Everyone is attacking everyone, get it, it doesn't matter who does what.The name of the game is fear.Cia involvment in Mumbia,see the comment below (bofors7715).Don't you get it?Its called International terrorism by design!Its like a crap game,the main players can fight or kill eachother,but when their game is threatend everyone bands togather.The name of the game is control and fear.The FSB is just one of the players.Its not an attack on your personality or country.The're talking about the game
There is no doubt that CIA was behind the Mumbai Massacre.
Maloy Dhar told me that over a year ago and now he has proven correct.
He also said that the Mossad was involved and there appears to some overt evidence to support the idea. Israel is doing business in India in a major way.
However, the evidence, including the reaction of Russia Today and Putin, is indicates that the FSB staged yet another terrorist attack to gain power.
And soon on tv in Russia, politicians, and media (RT) for example will be calling for more police and a tightening of security, (Medvedev, "we will destroy the terrorists"), he knows he's talking about his own FSB policys on the people. But thats oke because the cause is just according to the agenda, set by the global elite.
In other words hand over more of your freedoms and liberty, if there ever was such a thing in Russia. (reporters being murdered, etc).
oh pls get a hold of yourself, Russia is in on the same game as all the other countries and main players, keep the people in fear, thats the name of the game. Russia can play that game just as good as any other.
Indeed RT is dissapointing when it concers ther own Nationality! I view them to see how propaganda flies. Vice versa that is.
Thats why AJ is my favorite, he takes on all callers, and has done since I've been following him ( 11 years). The truth in my view chooses no sides and AJ is one of the best examples I'v seen in years.
Tarpley is my favorite, but his is not perfect. He always assumes the City of London is too blame. Reality is more complex. Furthermore, I believe he is now paid by Russia Today, which is run by the Russian Government (Putin).
We know that Putin stages terrorist attacks and kills people. Let's not forget about the 1999 apartment bombings so easily. Putin had Litvinenko assassinated for exposes his acts of terror in Russia.
I think Jones and Watson have it right, the Moscow attacks were almost certainly staged by Putin and the FSB. It clearly helps Putin shore up his position at home and gets him sympathetic views worldwide. Tarpley does not present a reasonable argument for his assertion that these attacks hurt Putin in any way.
Webster Tarpley is just amazing. His knowledge and analysis of all the geo-political manouvering that goes on is so deep and all encompasing that it's hard to keep up with. I don't know if his speculations are always correct but it's clear that this man understands world politics like few others!
He is always one of my favorite guests simply based on geopolitics and history due to the information that just flows with accuracy and ease for understanding. I read 9/11 Synthetic terror and its a great read. I disagree with him on economics but his heart is in the right place.
hehe ich hab was unanständiges entdeckt
RikkiMonafp620 2 months ago
"Londonistan" haha, Tarpley is awesome
IcedEarth426 1 year ago
Wich questions would I have to ask, to get information like Webster Tarpley?
TeunisD 1 year ago
Alex is such a dufus. He says Putin was Yeltsin's vice-president which is not true, He says Putin was not going to win if not for war in Chechnya, but that is bull shit also. Alex you are ignorant about Russia just like 99% of Americans, so stfu and listen to someone who has some understanding of Russian politics like Tarpley and don't repeat ridiculous claims after western msm like a parrot. you are discrediting yourself.
slavixtube 1 year ago
Alex Jones: 'I know that Russian Inteligence services have staged false flags before'
first of all this so general: 'false flags' could mean any deceptive operation and 'before'... what the hell does that mean before. Russia has been around for a thousand years so that is a long time for before. Other than vague claims Alex should provide EVIDENCE of any accusations. I know in the Russia is Evil world no evidence is necessary but to me Alex's credibility is shot when pulls something like this.
slavixtube 1 year ago
Alex Jones: 'I know that Russian Inteligence services have staged false flags before'
first of all this so general: 'false flags' could mean any deceptive operation and 'before'... what the hell does that mean before. Russia has been around for a thousand years so that is a long time for before. Other than vague claims Alex should provide EVIDENCE of any accusations. I know in the Russia is Evil world no evidence is necessary but to me Alex's credibility is shot when pulls something like this.
slavixtube 1 year ago
@slavixtube
I believe Alex Jones is actually pro Russian. I think what he is saying that even good countries have to behave deceptively some times.
jimgzorn 8 months ago in playlist xxRoNPauLxX
@jimgzorn
It does not matter what Jones means when he claims that Russian Intelligence staged false flags. Unless he provides evidence for his accusations, he is just as bad as the rest of the Russia hating crowd. I can say the same thing about anyone including Alex himself that 'I know Alex Jones staged false flags before' and I support his actions because I think he is a good guy and had to do it for good reason. Would you call me an Alex supporter for this?
slavixtube 8 months ago
@slavixtube
No, I wouldn't call you an Alex supporter for that, but if you consistently supported him otherwise, I would.
jimgzorn 8 months ago
@jimgzorn
Look, I don't think Alex is one of the numerous Russia haters, but I don't think he is pro-Russia either. I think he is pro-US actually. I think Alex is a good guy, but talks way more than he knows and his 'everything I say is right' attitude and loud rants turn me off and kill his credibility for me.
slavixtube 8 months ago
@slavixtube
Yes, some of his mannerisms bug me as well. I like Webster Tarpley better. But I think both are real nationalists, in the sense that they not only want the US to be strong and independent, but that they want all nations to be as strong and independent as possible.
jimgzorn 8 months ago
@jimgzorn
I agree with you.
slavixtube 8 months ago
Smart man.....
DeathOfTheDollar2010 1 year ago
Pure Russian Propaganda. Tarpley is an FSB plant.
NorthWolfe 1 year ago
@NorthWolfe Pure Anti-Russian Propaganda. You are a CIA plant. (how do you like them apples?)
slavixtube 1 year ago
Too elaborate, Webster old chum. You let yourself get carried away. The roar of the greasepaint.....
flyhead2 1 year ago
Too often I find Alex ranting about things he is not knowledgeable on.
FYI,
1. There is no position of vice-president in Russia and Putin was never a vice-president.
2. Putin did not launch a war in Chechnia after 99 Moscow apartment bombings. A month before the bombings Chechen militants invaded neghbouring Dagestan to try and take it over. That is what led to second Chechen war.
3. The false flag claims (FSB did it) are spread by people connected to Berezovski
slavixtube 1 year ago
Webster you ROCK !
And Alex shut up and listen, try to learn!
Don't pretend to be equal
to somebody who is so much more competent than you !
Have you ever hear word "modesty" Alex?
I know that is hard for you to accept but you are not new Jesus Christ , Alex!
TeslaGenius 1 year ago 4
Bombing is NOT in interest of Medvedev & specially NOT in interest of Putin whose image is built on bringing SECURITY in Russia
And specially NOT in Russian interest be cause of coming OLYMPIC GAMES they have ALL interests to keep that region calm be cause OLYMPIC GAMES will be CLOSE to that problematic region! Bombing attacks happen every year in Russia so making ONE false flag in the long series just doesn't make sense!
Do your research 1st Alex Jones be cause you are INCOMPETENT!
TeslaGenius 1 year ago 3
i have nothing to say bad about tarpley except the weed idea but keep up the fight tarp and stay safe truth is getting dangerous
lastpoet1 1 year ago
@truthislibertyus
Sure, Tarpley categorical denies the existence of any kind of a business cycle. This is absurd.
Tarpley's analysis of complex political events is also what I care about, not his ideas for solutions (which are naive and mute).
I do not care about whether or not Tarpley likes Ron Paul. He is not perfect either, but I still am sending money to his son Rand Paul who has a good shot to win a seat in the US Senate.
bofors7715 1 year ago
show me where he said that.
TheReallitycheck 1 year ago
@TheReallitycheck
One second... I am looking for the time mark.
bofors7715 1 year ago
@TheReallitycheck
Ok, Alex asks "how will this hurt Putin" at 7:47 in video.
I believe Tarpley's response contains this perhaps in "Kremlin circles" bit.
bofors7715 1 year ago
@TheReallitycheck
Ok, what Tarpley actually says is :
"... maybe in the secret councils of the Kremlin..."
This is at 9:16.
bofors7715 1 year ago
I see what you mean, but to get a clear picture of how Tarpley thinks, without mikes and sponsors one would need to spend a few months with him at his place with alot of wiskey or vodka. lol Which I would love to do.
TheReallitycheck 1 year ago
@truthislibertyus
Let's not turn this into a Tarpley bashing session.
I just want to point out that he has some biases:
(1) against City of London
(2) works for Russia Today (Putin) at the moment.
Tarpley's argument here that these attacks somehow hurt Putin is weak. In fact, he doesn't really have one. He says "maybe this hurt's Putin in Kremlin circles".
Then Tarpley totally ignores that fact that Putin and the FSB have done this before.
bofors7715 1 year ago
This full-drive conspiracy analysis a la Mr. Jones is too simplistic and populist, to be a faithful representation of complex reality. There are always different ways to see patterns in events. So it becomes too factional.
PetrovCyr1234 1 year ago
Come, what use is that attack for FSB?
Just to say next time there is something ugly by way of attacks in the West, that Russia couldn't be possibly involved since it itself suffers from terrorism?
PetrovCyr1234 1 year ago
@PetrovCyr1234
Don't be silly.
It is obvious that the attack justifies FSB power.
But let's focus on Putin.
This sort of thing. propagating the "al-Qaeda" myth, gains him credibility in with Western leaders.
It makes him much less easy to attack.
How can the West justify an attack on another victim of "al-Qaeda"?
bofors7715 1 year ago
Everyone is attacking everyone, get it, it doesn't matter who does what.The name of the game is fear.Cia involvment in Mumbia,see the comment below (bofors7715).Don't you get it?Its called International terrorism by design!Its like a crap game,the main players can fight or kill eachother,but when their game is threatend everyone bands togather.The name of the game is control and fear.The FSB is just one of the players.Its not an attack on your personality or country.The're talking about the game
TheReallitycheck 1 year ago
@TheReallitycheck
There is no doubt that CIA was behind the Mumbai Massacre.
Maloy Dhar told me that over a year ago and now he has proven correct.
He also said that the Mossad was involved and there appears to some overt evidence to support the idea. Israel is doing business in India in a major way.
However, the evidence, including the reaction of Russia Today and Putin, is indicates that the FSB staged yet another terrorist attack to gain power.
bofors7715 1 year ago 2
And soon on tv in Russia, politicians, and media (RT) for example will be calling for more police and a tightening of security, (Medvedev, "we will destroy the terrorists"), he knows he's talking about his own FSB policys on the people. But thats oke because the cause is just according to the agenda, set by the global elite.
In other words hand over more of your freedoms and liberty, if there ever was such a thing in Russia. (reporters being murdered, etc).
People will learn to get in line.
TheReallitycheck 1 year ago
@TheReallitycheck
Today's bombings in Dagestan further indicate this terror spree in Russia in an FSB & Putin job.
It will justify heightened military actions there.
Since Tarpley thinks that is Russia weak spot, it obviously makes sense for Russia to stage terrorism to secure it.
Again, Tarpley's analysis fails here. It is backwards.
bofors7715 1 year ago
@bofors7715
No, its not a false flag, if there was a false flag it would be against other countries like the US or others.
gosciu555 1 year ago
oh pls get a hold of yourself, Russia is in on the same game as all the other countries and main players, keep the people in fear, thats the name of the game. Russia can play that game just as good as any other.
TheReallitycheck 1 year ago
@TheReallitycheck
Furthermore, Putin and the FSB have been caught red-handed staging terrorism before.
Putin had the Duma members investigating it assassinated and put the the lead investigator in prison.
This was almost surely staged by the Russians themselves.
Again, Tarpley is my favorite, but his biases are showing here.
I also have enjoyed Russia Today, but its coverage on this event is disgusting.
bofors7715 1 year ago
Indeed RT is dissapointing when it concers ther own Nationality! I view them to see how propaganda flies. Vice versa that is.
Thats why AJ is my favorite, he takes on all callers, and has done since I've been following him ( 11 years). The truth in my view chooses no sides and AJ is one of the best examples I'v seen in years.
TheReallitycheck 1 year ago
Tarpley is my favorite, but his is not perfect. He always assumes the City of London is too blame. Reality is more complex. Furthermore, I believe he is now paid by Russia Today, which is run by the Russian Government (Putin).
We know that Putin stages terrorist attacks and kills people. Let's not forget about the 1999 apartment bombings so easily. Putin had Litvinenko assassinated for exposes his acts of terror in Russia.
bofors7715 1 year ago
I think Jones and Watson have it right, the Moscow attacks were almost certainly staged by Putin and the FSB. It clearly helps Putin shore up his position at home and gets him sympathetic views worldwide. Tarpley does not present a reasonable argument for his assertion that these attacks hurt Putin in any way.
bofors7715 1 year ago 2
Tarpley is great!
RedGunBullets 1 year ago 2
Tarpley and Celente are experts.
MrWisePete 1 year ago 9
Tarpley is brilliant!
I always listen to his interviews twice on Alex Jones show.
pp341 1 year ago 25
Webster Tarpley is just amazing. His knowledge and analysis of all the geo-political manouvering that goes on is so deep and all encompasing that it's hard to keep up with. I don't know if his speculations are always correct but it's clear that this man understands world politics like few others!
glazinq 1 year ago 39
@glazinq
He is always one of my favorite guests simply based on geopolitics and history due to the information that just flows with accuracy and ease for understanding. I read 9/11 Synthetic terror and its a great read. I disagree with him on economics but his heart is in the right place.
shiffty1032231 1 year ago
@glazinq Tarpley is damn good at what he does. Gerald Celente (another frequent guest on Alex's show) as well.
jedinightwing 1 year ago
@Then you will really appreciate "The House of Bush: Born in a Bank". Just use search. It's online.
star2000dancer 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why does Alex support 'teabagging?'
C'mon Alex
buckfushes 1 year ago
@buckfushes he sort of had a pretty big hand in helping Ron Paul form them......
Poonard 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
woot 3rd comment
JordanIZPwned 1 year ago
wow, this stuff blows be away every time
tatakikiru 1 year ago 6
GO ALEX!!!
todzilla73 1 year ago 5